Adelmann, H. (1942) The Embryological Treatises of Hieronymus Fabricius of Aquapendente, 2 vols., Ithaca.Google Scholar

Alexander, V. N. (2011) The Biologist’s Mistress: Rethinking Self-Organization in Art, Literature, and Nature, Litchfield Park, AZ.Google Scholar

Allen, C., Bekoff, M., Lauder, G. (eds.) (1998) Nature’s Purposes: Analyses of Function and Design in Biology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Anceschi, B. (2006) Die Götternamen in Platons Kratylos: Ein Vergleich mit dem Papyros von Derveni, Frankfurt-am-Main.Google Scholar

Ariew, A. (2002) ‘Platonic and Aristotelian roots of teleological arguments’, in Ariew, A., Cummins, R., Perlman, M. (eds.), Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology, Oxford, 7–32.Google Scholar

Armstrong, A. H. (1966–1988) Plotinius. The Enneads. I–VII (Loeb Classical Library), Cambridge, MA-London.Google Scholar

Ayala, F. A. (1970) ‘Teleological explanations in evolutionary biology’, Philosophy of Science 37(1),1–15.Google Scholar

Baldassarri, M. (1992) ‘Condizioni e limiti della scienza fisica nel De facie plutarcheo’, in Gallo, I. (ed.), Plutarco e le scienze, Genoa, 263–269.Google Scholar

Balme, D. M. (1939) ‘Greek science and mechanism: I, Aristotle on nature and chance’, CQ 33, 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balme, D. M. (1962) ‘Development of biology in Aristotle and Theophrastus: theory of spontaneous generation’, Phronesis 7, 91–104.Google Scholar

Balme, D. M. (1972) Aristotle. Parts of Animals. I: Generation of Animals I, Oxford. Revised 1992 by Gotthelf, A..Google Scholar

Balme, D. M. (1980), ‘Aristotle’s biology was not essentialist’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 62, 1–12. Reprinted with additions in Gotthelf, A. & Lennox, J. G. (eds.) (1987), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, Cambridge, 291–312.Google Scholar

Balme, D. M. (1987) ‘Teleology and necessity’, in Gotthelf, A. & Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, Cambridge, 275–285.Google Scholar

Balme, D. M. (1992) Aristotle. De Partibus Animalium I and De Generatione Animalium I (with passages from II. 1–3), Oxford.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (1975/1994) Aristotle. Posterior Analytics, Oxford.Google Scholar

Barrett, P. H. & Freeman, R. B., (eds.) (1986) The Works of Charles Darwin, vol. 1, New York.Google Scholar

Berg, R. van den, M. (2008) Proclus’ Commentary on the Cratylus: Ancient Theories of Language and Naming, Leiden.Google Scholar

Bernard, J. H. (1914) Kant’s Critique of Judgement, London.Google Scholar

Berryman, S. (1997) ‘Horror vacui in the 3rd century BCE’, in Sorabji, R. (ed.), Aristotle and After (BICS Suppl. 2), London, 147–157.Google Scholar

Berryman, S. (2002a) ‘Galen and the mechanical philosophy’, Apeiron 35.3, 235–254.Google Scholar

Berryman, S. (2002b) ‘Aristotle on pneuma and animal self-motion’, OSAP 23, 85–97.Google Scholar

Berryman, S. (2003) ‘Ancient automata and mechanical explanation’, Phronesis 48.4, 344–369.Google Scholar

Berryman, S. (2007) ‘Teleology without tears: Aristotle and the role of mechanistic conceptions of organisms’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37.3, 351–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berryman, S. (2009) The Mechanical Hypothesis in Ancient Greek Natural Philosophy, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Berti, E. (1997) ‘Da chi è amato il motore immobile? Su Aristotele, Metaph. XII 6–7’, Methexis 10, 59–82.Google Scholar

Berti, E. (2000a) ‘Il movimento del cielo in Alessandro di Afrodisia’, in Brancacci, A. (ed.), La filosofia in età imperiale, Naples, 227–243.Google Scholar

Berti, E. (2000b) ‘Unmoved mover(s) as efficient cause(s) in Metaphysics Λ 6’, in Frede, M. & Charles, D. (eds.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Lambda, Oxford, 181–206.Google Scholar

Betegh, G. (2004) The Derveni Papyrus, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Betegh, G. (2010) ‘What makes a Myth eikôs? Remarks inspired by Myles Burnyeat’s EIKÔS MYTHOS’, in Mohr, R. D. & Sattler, B. M. (eds.), One Book, The Whole Universe: Plato’s Timaeus Today, Las Vegas, 213–224.Google Scholar

Bourgey, L. (1980) ‘Hippocrate et Aristote: l’origine, chez le philosophe, de la doctrine concernant la nature’, in Grmek, M. D. & Robert, F. (eds.), Hippocratica, Paris, 59–64.Google Scholar

Boyle, R. (1688) A Disquisition about the Final Causes of Natural Things, London.Google Scholar

Brague, R. (1999) Thémistius. Paraphrase de la Métaphysique d’Aristote (livre lambda), Paris.Google Scholar

Brisson, L. (2002) ’Le demiurge du Timée et le créateur de la Genèse’, in Canto-Sperber, M. & Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Le style de la pensée, Paris, 25–39.Google Scholar

Brisson, L. (2012) ‘Why is the Timaeus called an eikôs muthos and an eikôs logos?’, in Collobert, C., Destrée, P., Gonzalez, F. J. (eds.), Plato and Myth: Studies on the Use and Status of Platonic Myths (Mnemosyne Suppl. 337), Leiden, 369–391.Google Scholar

Broadie, S. (1993) ‘Que fait le premier moteur d’Aristote?’, Revue philosophique 183.2, 375–411.Google Scholar

Burgess, S. (2000) ‘How to build a human body: an idealist’s guide’, in Wright, M. R. (ed.), Reason and Necessity: Essays on Plato’s Timaeus, London, 43–58.Google Scholar

Burks, A. W. (1958) Collected Papers of Charles S. Peirce, vols. 7–8, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. (2005) ‘EIKÔS MYTHOS’, Rhizai 2.2, 143–165. Reprinted in Partenie, C. (ed.) (2009), Plato’s Myths, Cambridge, 167–186.Google Scholar

Bylebyl, J. J. (1979) ‘The School of Padua: humanistic medicine in the sixteenth century’, in Webster, C. (ed.), Health, Medicine and Mortality in the Sixteenth Century, Cambridge, 335–370.Google Scholar

Bylebyl, J. J. (1982) ‘Boyle and Harvey on the valves in the veins’, Bull. Hist. Med. 56(3): 351–367.Google Scholar

Calabi, F. (2000) ’Galeno e Mosé’, Rivista di storia della filosofia 4: 535–546.Google Scholar

Casevitz, M. & Babut, D. (2004) Plutarque. Œuvres morales, Tome XV, 1re partie, Traité 70, Sur les contradictions stoïciennes. Traité 71, Synopsis du traité ‘Que les Stoïciens tiennent des propos plus paradoxaux que les poètes’, Paris.Google Scholar

Carteron, H. (1923/1975) ‘Does Aristotle have a mechanics?’, in Barnes, J., Schofield, M., Sorabji, R. (eds.), Articles on Aristotle. 1. Science, London, 161–174.Google Scholar

Carteron, H. (1988) ‘Aristotle on hypothetical necessity and irreducibility’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 69, 1–53Google Scholar

Charles, D. (1991) ‘Teleological causation in the Physics’, in Judson, L. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Collection of Essays, Oxford, 101–128.Google Scholar

Charles, S. R. (2006) The Emergent Metaphysics in Plato’s Theory of Disorder, Lexington, KY.Google Scholar

Charlton, W. (1992) Aristotle. Physics. Books I and II, Oxford.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. (2009) ‘Galen and Middle Platonism’, in Gill, C., Whitmarsh, T., Wilkins, J. (eds.), Galen and the World of Knowledge, Cambridge, 243–260.Google Scholar

Cherniss, H. (1951) ‘Notes on Plutarch’s De facie in orbe lunae’, CPh 46, 137–158.Google Scholar

Cherniss, H. (1971) ‘The sources of evil according to Plato’, in Vlastos, G. (ed.), Plato, vol. 2, New York, 244–258.Google Scholar

Cherniss, H. (1976) Plutarch’s Moralia, vol. 13, part 2 (Loeb Classical Library), Cambridge, MA-London.Google Scholar

Cherniss, H. & Helmbold, W. C. (1957) Plutarch’s Moralia, vol. 12 (Loeb Classical Library), Cambridge, MA-London.Google Scholar

Clegg, J. S. (1976) ‘Plato’s vision of chaos’, CQ 26: 52–61.Google Scholar

Coles, A. (1995) ‘Biomedical models of reproduction in the fifth century BC and Aristotle’s Generation of Animals’, Phronesis 40.1, 48–88.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. M. (1982) ‘Aristotle on natural teleology’, in Schofield, M. & Nussbaum, M. C. (eds.), Language and Logos, Cambridge, 197–222.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. M. (1985) ‘Hypothetical necessity’, in Gotthelf, A. (ed.), Aristotle on Nature and Living Things, Pittsburgh-Bristol, 151–167. Reprinted in Cooper, J. M. (ed.) (2004), Knowledge, Nature and the Good, Princeton, 130–173.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. M. (1987) ‘Hypothetical necessity and natural teleology’, in Gotthelf, A. & Lennox, J. G. (eds.) (1987), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, Cambridge, 243–274.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. M. (1988) ‘Metaphysics in Aristotle’s embryology’, PCPS 214, 315–326. Reprinted in Cooper, J. M. (2004), Knowledge, Nature and the Good, Princeton, 174–203.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. M. (1990) ‘Political animals and civic friendship’, in Patzig, G. (ed.), Aristoteles Politik: Akten des XI. Symposium Aristotelicum, Göttingen, 221–241.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. M. (ed.) (1997) Plato. Complete Works, Indianapolis-Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cornford, F. M. (1932) ‘Mathematics and dialectic in the Republic vi-vii’, Mind 41, 37–52. Reprinted in Allen, R. E. (ed.) (1965), Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics, London, 61–95.Google Scholar

Craik, E. M. (1998) Hippocrates. Places in Man. Oxford.Google Scholar

Craik, E. M. (2006) Two Hippocratic Treatises. On Sight and on Anatomy, Leiden.Google Scholar

Craik, E. M. (2009) The Hippocratic Treatise on Glands, Leiden.Google Scholar

Craik, E. M. (2010) ‘The teaching of surgery’, in Horstmanshoff, M. (ed.), Hippocrates and Medical Education. Leiden, 223–234.Google Scholar

Cunningham, A. (1985) ‘Fabricius and the “Aristotle Project” in anatomical teaching and research at Padua’, in Wear, A., French, R. K., Lonie, I. M. (eds.), The Medical Renaissance of the Sixteenth Century, Cambridge, 195–222.Google Scholar

Darwin, C., (1859) On the Origin of Species, London.Google Scholar

Darwin, C., (1871) The Descent of Man. London.Google Scholar

Darwin, C., (1872) The Origin of Species, 6th edn., London.Google Scholar

Dear, P. (2006) The Intelligibility of Nature: How Science Makes Sense of the World, Chicago.Google Scholar

Deer [Richardson], L. A. (1980) Academic Theories of Generation in the Renaissance: The Contemporaries and Successors of Jean Fernel (1497–1558). PhD. Diss., Warburg Institute, University of London.Google Scholar

De Lacy, P. H. (1972) ‘Galen’s Platonism’, AJP 93, 27–39.Google ScholarPubMed

De Lacy, P. H. (1978–84) Galen. On the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato, 3 vols. (CMG V 4,1,2), Berlin.Google Scholar

De Lacy, P. H. (1992) Galen. On Semen (CMG V 3,1), Berlin.Google Scholar

De Lacy, P. H. (1996) Galen. On the Elements according to Hippocrates (CMG V 1,2), Berlin.Google Scholar

Dell’Amore, C. (2011) ‘Why do we yawn? It may keep us from getting hot-headed’, National Geographic, Online publication.Google Scholar

Depew, D. J. (1995) ‘Humans and other political animals in Aristotle’s History of Animals’, Phronesis 40, 156–181.Google Scholar

Dijksterhuis, E. J. (1950/1961) The Mechanization of the World Picture, Oxford.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. M. (1995) ‘“A kind of warmth”: some reflections on the concept of “grace” in the Neoplatonic tradition’, in Ayres, L. (ed.), The Passionate Intellect: Essays on the Transformation of Classical Traditions presented to Professor I. G. Kidd. New Brunswick, 323–332. Reprinted in Dillon, J. M. (ed.) (1997), The Great Tradition: Further Studies in the Development of Platonism and Christianity, Essay XIV, Aldershot.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. & Polleichner, W. (eds.) (2009) Iamblichus of Chalcis. The Letters, Atlanta.Google Scholar

Donini, P. L. (1988) ‘Science and metaphysics: Platonism, Aristotelianism, and Stoicism in Plutarch’s On the face in the moon’, in Dillon, J. M. & Long, A. A. (eds.), The Question of ‘Eclecticism’: Studies in Later Greek Philosophy, Berkeley-Los Angeles-London, 126–144.Google Scholar

Donini, P. L. (1992a) ‘Il De facie di Plutarco e la teologia medioplatonica’, in Gersh, S. & Kannengiesser, C. (eds.), Platonism in Late Antiquity (Christianity and Judaism in Antiquity 8), Notre Dame, 103–113.Google Scholar

Donini, P. L. (1992b) ‘I fondamenti della fisica e la teoria delle cause in Plutarco’, in Gallo, I. (ed.), Plutarco e le scienze, Genoa, 99–120.Google Scholar

Donini, P. L. (2008) ‘Psychology’, in Hankinson, R. J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galen, Cambridge, 184–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donini, P. L. (2010) ‘Il volto della luna: scienza e mito in Plutarco di Cheronea’, Rivista di storia della filosofia 3, 391–422.Google Scholar

Drabkin, I. E. (1938) ‘Notes on the laws of motion in Aristotle’, Am. J. Phil. 59, 60–84.Google Scholar

Dudley, J. (2012) Aristotle’s Concept of Chance, Albany.Google Scholar

École, J., (1983) Christian Wolff: Gesammelte Werke, II. Abteilung, Band 1.1, Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Edelstein, L. & Kidd, I. G. (1972) Posidonius. Volume I. The Fragments, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Eddy, M. D. (2004) ‘The rhetoric and science of William Paley’s Natural Theology’, Literature & Theology 18, 1–22.Google Scholar

Eijk, P. (1994) Aristoteles. De insomniis. De divinatione per somnum, Berlin.Google Scholar

Eijk, P. (1997) ‘The matter of mind: Aristotle on the biology of ‘psychic’ processes’, in Kullmann, W. & Föllinger, S. (eds.), Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse, Stuttgart, 231–258.Google Scholar

Eijk, P. (2000–2001) Diocles of Carystus: A Collection of the Fragments with Translation and Commentary, 2 vols., Leiden.Google Scholar

Eijk, P. (2005a) ‘The “theology” of the Hippocratic treatise On the sacred disease’, in Eijk, P., Medicine and Philosophy in Classical Antiquity, Cambridge, 45–73.Google Scholar

Eijk, P. (2005b) ‘Divine movement and human nature in Eudemian Ethics VIII.2’, in Eijk, P., Medicine and Philosophy in Classical Antiquity, Cambridge, 238–258.Google Scholar

Eijk, P. (2009) ‘“Aristotle! What a thing for you to say!” Galen’s engagement with Aristotle and Aristotelians’, in Gill, C., Whitmarsh, T., Wilkins, J. (eds.), Galen and the World of Knowledge, Cambridge, 261–281.Google Scholar

Eijk, P. (2013) ‘Cure and (in)curability of mental disorders in ancient medical and philosophical thought’, in Harris, W. V. (ed.), Mental Disorders in the Classical World, Leiden, 307–338.Google Scholar

Eijk, P. (2014) ‘Galen on the nature of human beings’, in Adamson, P., Hansberger, R., Wilberding, J. (eds.), Philosophical Themes in Galen (BICS Suppl. 114), London, 89–134.Google Scholar

Ellis, J. (1988) ‘The aporematic character of Theophrastus’ Metaphysics’, in Fortenbaugh, W. W. & Sharples, R. W. (eds.), Theophrastean Studies (RUSCH 3), New Brunswick, 215–223.Google Scholar

Fabricius, H. (1687) Opera omnia anatomica & physiologica, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Farquharson, A. S. L. (1984) Movement of Animals, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. 1, Princeton, 1087–1096.Google Scholar

Ferguson, J. (1985) ‘Teleology in Aristotle’s Politics’, in Gotthelf, A. (ed.), Aristotle on Nature and Living Things, Pittsburgh-Bristol, 259–273.Google Scholar

De Filippo, J. G. & Mistis, P. T. (1994) ‘Socrates and Stoic natural law’, in Vander Waerdt, P. A. (ed.), The Socratic Movement, Ithaca, 252–271.Google Scholar

Fine, G. (1977) ‘Plato on naming’, Phil. Q. 27, 289–301.Google Scholar

Flemming, R. & Hanson, A. E. (1988) ‘Hippocrates’ Peri Partheniôn (“Diseases of Young Girls”): text and translation’, Early Science & Medicine 3(3),241–252.Google Scholar

Forster, E. S. (1984) Mechanics and Problems, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. 2, Princeton, 1299–1318; 1319–1527.Google Scholar

Fortuna, S. (1997) Galeni de Constitutione Artis Medicae ad Patrophilum (CMG V 1,3), Berlin.Google Scholar

Jr. Frank, R. (1980) William Harvey and the Oxford Physiologists, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Franklin, K. (1957) Movement of the Heart and Blood in Animals: An Anatomical Essay by William Harvey, Oxford.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1999) ‘Epilogue’, in Algra, K. et al. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge, 771–797.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (2007) ‘On the unity and the aim of the Derveni Text’, Rhizai 4, 9–33.Google Scholar

Freeth, T., Jones, A. R., Steel, J. M., Yanis, B. (2008) ‘Calendars with Olympiad display and eclipse prediction on the Antikythera Mechanism’, Nature 454, 614–617.Google Scholar

French, R. (1994) William Harvey’s Natural Philosophy, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Furley, D. J. (1985) ‘The rainfall example in Physics II.8’, in Gotthelf, A. (ed.), Aristotle on Nature and Living Things, Pittsburgh-Bristol, 177–182. Reprinted in Furley, D. J. (ed.) (1989), Cosmic Problems, Cambridge, 115–120.Google Scholar

Furley, D. J. (1996) ‘What kind of cause is Aristotle’s final cause?’, in Frede, M. & Striker, G. (eds.), Rationality in Greek Thought, Oxford, 59–79.Google Scholar

Furley, D. J. (2003) ‘Aristotle and the Atomists on forms and final causes’, in Sharples, R. W. (ed.) Perspectives on Greek Philosophy, Aldershot, 70–84.Google Scholar

Furley, D. J. & Wilkie, J. S. (1984) Galen on Respiration and the Arteries, Princeton.Google Scholar

Gallego Pérez, M. T. (1996) ‘Physis dans la Collection hippocratique’, in Wittern, R. & Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Hippokratische Medizin und antike Philosophie, Paris, 419–436.Google Scholar

Gallup, A. C. & Hack, G. D. (2011) ‘Human paranasal sinuses and selective brain cooling: a ventilation system activated by yawning?’, Medical Hypotheses 77 (6), 970–973.Google Scholar

Gardner, A. (2010) ‘Life without purpose’, Review of Reiss, J. O., Not by Design: Retiring Darwin’s Watchmaker, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25 (3), 134–135.Google Scholar

Gaukroger, S. (2006) The Emergence of a Scientific Culture: Science and the Shaping of Modernity, 1210–1685, Oxford.Google Scholar

Genequand, C. (1984) Ibn Rushd’s Metaphysics: A Translation with Introduction of Ibn Rushd’s Commentary on Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Book Lambda, Leiden.Google Scholar

Ghiselin, M. T. (1994) ‘Darwin’s language may seem teleological, but his thinking is another matter’, Biology and Philosophy 9, 489–492.Google Scholar

Giannakis, E. (1996) ‘Fragments from Alexander’s lost commentary on Aristotle’s Physics’, Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Arabisch-Islamischen Wissenchaften 10, 157–187.Google Scholar

Gotthelf, A. (1976) ‘Aristotle’s conception of final causality’, Review of Metaphysics 30, 226–254. Revised with postscript in Gotthelf, A. & Lennox, J. G. (eds.) (1987), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, Cambridge, 204–242.Google Scholar

Gotthelf, A. (1987) ‘First principles in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals’, in Gotthlef, A., Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, Cambridge, 167–198.Google Scholar

Görgemanns, H. (1970) Untersuchungen zu Plutarchs Dialog De facie in orbe lunae (Bibliothek der klassischen Altertumswissenschaften, N.F. 2. Reihe, 33), Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Goudge, T.A. (1961) The Ascent of Life: A Philosophical Study of the Theory of Evolution, London.Google Scholar

Gourinat, J.-B. (2009) ‘The Stoics on matter and prime matter’, in Salles, R. (ed.), God and Cosmos in Stoicism, Oxford, 46–70.Google Scholar

Grams, L. (2009) ‘Medical theory in Plato’s Timaeus’, Rhizai 6, 161–192.Google Scholar

Groot, J. de. (2008) ‘Dunamis and the science of mechanics: Aristotle on animal motion’, J. Hist. Phil. 46, 43–68.Google Scholar

Groot, J. de. (2014) Aristotle’s Empiricism: Experience and Mechanics in the 4^th Century BC, Las Vegas.Google Scholar

Gundert, B. (2005) ‘Galen on the acts of nature in disease’, unpublished paper delivered at the Pybus Research Seminar in the History of Medicine, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, 28 April.Google Scholar

Gundert, B. (2009) Galen. De symptomatum differentiis, CMG V 5,1, Berlin.Google Scholar

Hahm, D. E. (1977) The Origins of Stoic Cosmology, Columbus.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (1988a) ‘Galen explains the elephant’, in Matthen, M. & Linsky, L. (eds.), Philosophy and Biology (Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Suppl. 14), 135–157.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (1988b) (ed.) Method, Medicine and Metaphysic (Apeiron 21.4), Edmonton.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (1989) ‘Galen and the best of all possible worlds’, CQ 39, 206–227.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (1991) ‘Galen’s anatomy of the soul’, Phronesis 36.3, 197–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (1995) ‘Science’, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle, Cambridge, 140–167.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (1997) ‘Le phénomène et l’obscur: Galien et les animaux’, in Cassin, B. & Labarrière, J.-L. (eds.), L’animal dans l’antiquité, Paris, 75–93.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (1998) Causation and Explanation in Ancient Greek Thought, Oxford.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (2003) ‘Causation in Galen’, in Barnes, J. & Jouanna, J. (eds.), Galien et la philosophie, Geneva, 31–66.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (2005) ‘Aristotle on kind-crossing’, in Sharples, R. W. (ed.), Philosophy and the Sciences in Antiquity. Aldershot, 23–54.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (ed.) (2008a) The Cambridge Companion to Galen, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (2008b) ‘Epistemology’, in Hankinson, R. J. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Galen, Cambridge, 157–183.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (2008c) ‘Philosophy of nature’, in Hankinson, R. J. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Galen, Cambridge, 210–241.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (2009a) ‘Medicine and the science of the soul’, in Wallis, F. (ed.), Medicine and the Soul of Science (Canadian Bulletin of Medical History 26.1), 131–156.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (2009b) ‘Galen on the limitations of knowledge’, in Gill, C., Whitmarsh, T., Wilkins, J. (eds.), Galen and the World of Knowledge, Cambridge, 206–242.Google Scholar

Hardcastle, J. H. (1914a) ‘Prof. Turner and Aristotle’, Nature 92, 584.Google Scholar

Hardcastle, J. H. (1914b) ‘Aristotle’s Physics’, Nature 93, 428.Google Scholar

Hattab, H. (2005) ‘From mechanics to mechanism: the Quaestiones Mechanicae and Descartes’ Physics’, in Anstey, P. R., Schuster, J. A. (eds.), The Science of Nature in the Seventeenth Century, Dordrecht, 99–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heath, M. (2008) ‘Aristotle on natural slavery’, Phronesis 53, 243–270.Google Scholar

Heinimann, F. (1961) ‘Eine vorplatonische Theorie der τέχνη’, Museum Helveticum 18, 105–130.Google Scholar

Helmreich, G. (1893) Claudii Galeni scripta minora III, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Helmreich, G. (1904) Galeni de Temperamentis Libri III, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Helmreich, G. (1907–1909) Galeni de Usu partium, 2 vols., Leipzig.Google Scholar

Hempel, C. G. (1965) Aspects of Scientific Explanation, New York.Google Scholar

Henry, D. (2003) ‘Themistius and spontaneous generation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics’, OSAP 24, 183–208.Google Scholar

Henry, D. (2005) ‘Embryological models in ancient philosophy’, Phronesis 50, 1–42.Google Scholar

Henry, D. (2006) ‘Aristotle on the mechanism of inheritance’, Journal of the History of Biology 39, 425–455.Google Scholar

Henry, D. (2008) ‘Organismal natures’, in Mouracade, J. (ed.), Aristotle on Life (Apeiron 41.3), Edmonton, 47–74.Google Scholar

Henry, D. (2009) ‘Generation of Animals’, in Anagnostopoulos, G. (ed.). A Companion to Aristotle, Oxford and Hoboken, NJ, 368–383.Google Scholar

Highmore, N. (1651a) Corporis humani disquisitio anatomica, The Hague.Google Scholar

Highmore, N. (1651b) History of Generation, London.Google Scholar

Hiller, E. (1878) Theonis Smyrnaei. Expositio rerum mathematicarum ad legendum Platonem utilium, Leipzig. Reprinted, Amsterdam, 1966.Google Scholar

Hunter, M. (2009) Boyle: Between God and Science, New Haven and London.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. & Macalpine, J. (1958) ‘William Harvey and Robert Boyle’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 13 (2), 115–127.Google Scholar

Hussey, E. (1991) ‘Aristotle’s mathematical physics: a reconstruction’, in Judson, L. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics, Oxford, 213–242.Google Scholar

Illetterati, L. & Michelini, F. (eds.) (2008) Purposiveness: Teleology between Nature and Mind, Frankfurt-am-Main.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. (1991) ‘Chrysippus on extension and the void’, RIPh 178, 245–266.Google Scholar

Isaac, D. (1982) Proclus, Trois études sur la providence. III. De l’existence du mal, Paris.Google Scholar

James, W. (1902/1985) The Varieties of Religious Experience, New York-London.Google Scholar

Jaulin, A. (2008) ‘Remarques sur la conception de la nature dans les §2–6 du De fato d’Alexandre d’Aphrodise’, Les Études Philosophiques 86, 343–352.Google Scholar

Johansen, T. K. (2004) Plato’s Natural Philosophy: A Study of the Timaeus-Critias, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Johansen, T. K. (2008) ‘Introduction’, in Lee, H. P. D., Plato. Timaeus and Critias, London.Google Scholar

Johansen, T. K. (2014) ‘Why the cosmos needs a craftsman: Plato, Timaeus 27d5–29b1’, Phronesis 53, 297–320.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. R. (2005) Aristotle on Teleology, Oxford.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. R. (2009) ‘The Aristotelian explanation of the halo’, Apeiron 42, 325–357.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. R. (2015) Review of De Groot, Aristotle’s Empiricism: Experience and Mechanics in the 4th Century BC, Ancient Philosophy 35.1, 220–230.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. R. & Hutchinson, D. S. (2005) ‘Authenticating Aristotle’s Protrepticus’, OSAP 29, 193–294.Google Scholar

Johnston, I. (2006) Galen. On Diseases and Symptoms, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Joly, R. (1960) Recherches sur le traité pseudo-hippocratique du régime, Paris.Google Scholar

Joly, R. (1970) Hippocrate. De la génération; de la nature de l’enfant; des maladies IV; du foetus de huit mois, Paris.Google Scholar

Joly, R. (1984), Hippocrate. Du régime (Hippocatis. De Diaeta), Corpus Medicorum Graecorum I 2,4, Berlin.Google Scholar

Joly, R. & Byl, S. (1984) Hippocrate. Du Régime (CMG I 2,4), Berlin.Google Scholar

Jones, W. H. S. (1923a) Hippocrates, vol. 1 (Loeb Classical Library), Cambridge, MA-London.Google Scholar

Jones, W. H. S. (1923b) Hippocrates, vol. 2 (Loeb Classical Library), Cambridge, MA-London.Google Scholar

Jones, W. H. S. (1931) Hippocrates, vol. 4 (Loeb Classical Library), Cambridge, MA-London.Google Scholar

Jouanna, J. (1996) Hippocrate. Airs, Eaux, Lieux, Paris.Google Scholar

Judson, L. (ed.). (1995) Essays on Aristotle’s Physics, Oxford.Google Scholar

Judson, L. (2005) ‘Arisotelian teleology’, OSAP 39, 341–366.Google Scholar

Kahn, C. (1997) ‘Was Euthyphro the author of the Derveni Papyrus?’, in Laks, A. & Most, G. (eds.), Studies in the Derveni Papyrus, Oxford, 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keller, E. F. & Lloyd, E. A. (eds.) (1992) Keywords in Evolutionary Biology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Kenny, A. (1973) The Anatomy of the Soul: Historical Essays in the Philosophy of Mind, Oxford.Google Scholar

Keynes, G. (1966) The Life of William Harvey, Oxford.Google Scholar

Keyt, D. (1971) ‘The mad craftsman of the Timaeus’, Phil. Rev. 80, 230–235.Google Scholar

Keyt, D. (1991) ‘Three basic theorems in Aristotle’s Politics’, in Keyt, D. & Miller, F. D. Jr. (eds.), A Companion to Aristotle’s Politics, Oxford, 118–141.Google Scholar

Kidd, I. G. (1988) Posidonius, vol. II. The Commentary: (i) Testimonia and Fragments 1–149, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kidd, I. G. (1992) ‘Theophrastus’ Meteorology, Aristotle and Posidonius’, in Fortenbaugh, W. W. & Gutas, D. (eds.), Theophrastus: His Psychological, Doxographical and Scientific Writings (RUSCH 5), New Brunswick, 294–306.Google Scholar

Kjærgaard, P. C. (2010) ‘The Darwin Enterprise: from scientific icon to global product’, Hist. Sci. 48, 105–122.Google Scholar

Knorr, W. F. (1975) The Evolution of the Euclidean Elements, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Kouremenos, T., Parassoglou, G. M., Tsantsanoglou, K. (eds.) (2006) The Derveni Papyrus (Studi e testi per il corpus dei papyri filosofici 13), Firenze.Google Scholar

Kovacic, F. (2001) Der Begriff der Physis bei Galen vor dem Hintergrund seiner Vorgänger (Philosophie der Antike 12), Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Kraut, R. (2002) Aristotle. Political Philosophy, Oxford.Google Scholar

Kühn, C. G. (ed.). (1821–1833) Claudii Galeni Opera omnia, 20 vols., Lipsiae. Reprinted Hildesheim, 1964–1965; Oxford microfilms, 1976.Google Scholar

Kullmann, W. (1991) ‘Man as political animal in Aristotle’, in Keyt, D. & Miller, F. D. Jr. (eds.), A Companion to Aristotle’s Politics, Oxford, 94–117.Google Scholar

Laird, W. R. (2000) The Unfinished Mechanics of Giuseppe Moletti, Toronto.Google Scholar

Laird, W. R. (2008) ‘Nature, mechanics, and voluntary movement in Giuseppe Moletti’s lectures on the pseudo-aristotelian Mechanica’, in Laird, W. R. & Roux, S(eds.), Mechanics and Natural Philosophy before the Scientific Revolution, Dordrecht, 173–183.Google Scholar

Laurentius, A. (1599) Historia anatomica humani corporis et singularium eius partis multis controversiis & observationibus novis illustrata, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar

Laks, A. (2000) ‘Metaphysics Λ 7’, in Frede, M. & Charles, D. (eds.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Lambda, Oxford, 207–243.Google Scholar

Laks, A., Most, G. W., Rudolph, E. (1988) ‘Four notes on Theophrastus’ Metaphysics’, in Fortenbaugh, W. W. & Sharples, R.W. (eds.), Theophrastean Studies (RUSCH 3), New Brunswick, 224–256.Google Scholar

Landauer, S. (ed.) (1903) Themistii in Aristotelis Metaphysicorum Librum Λ paraphrases (CAG 5.5), Berlin.Google Scholar

Lang, H. S. (1993) ‘The structure and subject of Metaphysics Λ’, Phronesis 38, 257–280Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. (1982) ‘Teleology, chance, and Aristotle’s theory of spontaneous generation’, J. Hist. Philos. 20, 219–238.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. (1983) ‘Robert Boyle’s defense of teleological inference in experimental science’, Isis 74, 38–52.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. (1985a) ‘Are Aristotelian species eternal?’, in Gotthelf, A. (ed.), Aristotle on Nature and Living Things, Pittsburgh-Bristol, 67–94. Reprinted in Lennox, J. G. (2001), Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology: Studies in the Origins of Life Science, Cambridge, 131–159.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. (1985b) ‘Plato’s unnatural teleology’, in O’Meara, D. J. (ed.), Platonic Investigations, Washington, 195–218. Reprinted in Lennox, J. G. (2001), Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology: Studies in the Origins of Life Science, Cambridge, 280–302.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. (1992) ‘Teleology’, in Keller, E. F. & Lloyd, E. A. (eds.), Keywords in Evolutionary Biology, Cambridge, MA, 324–333.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. (1993) ‘Darwin was a teleologist’, Biology and Philosophy 8, 409–421.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. (1999) ‘The place of mankind in Aristotle’s zoology’, Philosophical Topics 27, 1–16.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. (2001) ‘Plato’s unnatural teleology’, in Lennox, J. G. (ed.), Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology, Cambridge, 281–302.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. (2005) ‘The place of zoology in Aristotle’s natural philosophy’, in Sharples, R. W. (ed.), Philosophy and the Sciences in Antiquity, Aldershot, 55–71.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. (2006a) ‘The comparative study of animal development: William Harvey’s Aristotelianism’, in Smith, J. (ed.), The Problem of Animal Generation in Early Modern Philosophy, Cambridge, 21–46.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. (2006b) ‘William Harvey’s experiments and conceptual innovation’, Medicina & Storia 12, 5–27.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. (2006c) ‘Aristotle’s biology and Aristotle’s philosophy’, in Gill, M. L. & Pellegrin, P. (eds.), A Companion to Ancient Philosophy, London, 292–315.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. & Bolton, R. (eds.). (2010) Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lesky, E. (1957) ‘Harvey und Aristoteles’, Sudhoffs Archiv 41, 289–316; 349–378.Google Scholar

Lettinck, P. (1994) Aristotle’s Physics and its Reception in the Arabic World: With an Edition of the Unpublished Parts of Ibn Bâjja’s Commentary on the Physics, Leiden.Google Scholar

Leunissen, M. (2009) ‘Why stars have no feet: teleological explanations in Aristotle’s cosmology’, in Bowen, A. C. & Wildberg, C. (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo, Leiden, 245–271.Google Scholar

Leunissen, M. (2010a) Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle’s Science of Nature, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Leunissen, M. (2010b) ‘Nature as a good housekeeper: secondary teleology and material necessity in Aristotle’s biology’, Apeiron 43.4, 117–142.Google Scholar

Lewis, F. A. (1988) ‘Teleology and material/efficient causes in Aristotle’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 69, 54–98.Google Scholar

Lindsay, J. (1928) Dionysos: Nietzsche contra Nietzsche: An Essay in Lyrical Philosophy, London.Google Scholar

Lintott, A. (1982) Violence, Civil Strife and Revolution in the Classical City, London.Google Scholar

Littré, E. (1839–1861) Oeuvres complètes d’Hippocrate, Paris.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (1996) Aristotelian Explorations, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (2003) In the Grip of Disease, Oxford.Google Scholar

Lloyd-Jones, H. (1971) The Justice of Zeus, Berkeley-Los Angeles-London.Google Scholar

Lombard, L. (2005) Aristote et la médecine: le fait et la cause, Paris.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. & Sedley, D. N. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Longrigg, J. (1993) Greek Rational Medicine, London.Google Scholar

Lonie, I. M. (1981) The Hippocratic Treatises ‘On Generation’, ‘On the Nature of the Child’, ‘Diseases IV: A Commentary’, Berlin.Google Scholar

MacKenna, S (1992) Plotinus. The Enneads, New York.Google Scholar

Mackie, J. L. (1974) The Cement of the Universe, Oxford.Google Scholar

Mason, A. S. (2006) ‘Plato on necessity and chaos’, Philosophical Studies 127, 283–298.Google Scholar

Matthen, M. (1989) ‘The four causes in Aristotle’s embryology’, in Penner, T. & Kraut, R. (eds.), Nature, Knowledge and Virtue (Apeiron 22.4), Edmonton, 159–179.Google Scholar

May, G. (1978) Schöpfung aus dem Nichts: Die Entstehung der Lehre von der creatio ex nihilo, Berlin.Google Scholar

May, M. T. (1968) Galen. On the Usefulness of the Parts of the Body. Translated with introduction and notes, 2 vols., Ithaca.Google Scholar

Mayhew, R. (1997) ‘Part and whole in Aristotle’s political philosophy’, Journal of Ethics 1, 325–340.Google Scholar

Mayhew, R. (2004) The Female in Aristotle’s Biology, Chicago.Google Scholar

Mayr, E. (1974) ‘Teleological and teleonomic, a new analysis’, in Cohen, R. S. & Wartofsky, M. W. (eds.), Methodological and Historical Essays in the Natural and Social Sciences (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14), Dordrecht-Boston, 91–117.Google Scholar

Mayr, E. (1992) ‘The idea of teleology’, J. Hist. Ideas 53, 117–135.Google Scholar

McDonough, J. K. (2011) ‘The heyday of teleology and early modern philosophy’, in Carriero, J. (ed.), Early Modern Philosophy Reconsidered: Essays in Honor of Paul Hoffman (Midwest Studies in Philosophy 35), 179–204.Google Scholar

McKirahan, R. (1978) ‘Aristotle’s subordinate sciences’, British Journal for the History of Science 11, 197–220.Google Scholar

McLaughlin, P. (nd.a) The Question of the Authenticity of the Mechanical Problems. Unpublished ms.Google Scholar

McLaughlin, P. (nd.b) The Program of Aristotle’s Mechanics and the Balance with Unequal Arms. Unpublished ms.Google Scholar

McLaughlin, P. (2001) What Functions Explain, Cambridge.Google Scholar

McPherran, M. L. (1996) The Religion of Socrates, Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Menn, S. (1995) Plato on God as Nous, Carbondale, IL.Google Scholar

Michler, M. (1962) ‘Die praktische bedeutung des Normativen Physis-Begriffs in der Hippokratischen Schrift De Fracturis-De Articulis’, Hermes 90, 385–401.Google Scholar

Midgley, M. (1985/2002) Evolution as a Religion, London.Google Scholar

Midgley, M. (1992) Science as Salvation: A Modern Myth and Its Meaning, London.Google Scholar

Midgley, M. (2010) The Solitary Self: Darwin and the Selfish Gene, Durham.Google Scholar

Moraux, P. (1985). ‘Galen and Aristotle’s De partibus animalium’, in Gotthelf, A. (ed.), Aristotle on Nature and Living Things, Pittsburgh-Bristol, 327–344.Google Scholar

Mouracade, J. (ed.). (2008) Aristotle on Life (Apeiron 41.3), Edmonton.Google Scholar

Müller, I. (ed.). (1891) Claudii Galeni Pergameni Scripta Minora II, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Murray, P. (1999) ‘What is a muthos for Plato?’, in Buxton, R. (ed.), From Myth to Reason? Studies in the Development of Greek Thought, Oxford.Google Scholar

Nachmanson, E. (1917) Erotianstudien, Uppsala.Google Scholar

Nachmanson, E. (1918) Erotiani vocum Hippocraticum collectio cum fragmentis, Uppsala.Google Scholar

Nagel, T. (1979) Teleology Revisited and Other Essays in the Philosophy and History of Science, New York.Google Scholar

Nagel, T. (2012) Mind and Cosmos, Oxford.Google Scholar

Nickel, D. (2001) Galeni. De foetuum formatione (CMG V 3,3), Berlin.Google Scholar

Novak, J. (1978) ‘A geometrical syllogism: Posterior Analytics II 11’, Apeiron 12, 26–33.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M.C. (1978) Aristotle’s De motu animalium, Princeton.Google Scholar

Nutton, V. (1999) Galen. On My Own Opinions (CMG V 3,2), Berlin.Google Scholar

Nutton, V. (2004) Ancient Medicine, London.Google Scholar

Nutton, V. (2011) with Bos, G., Galen. On Problematical Movements, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Oates, W. J. (1963) Aristotle and the Problem of Value, Princeton.Google Scholar

O’Brien, C. S. (2015) The Demiurge in Ancient Thought, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (1999) ‘Antiperistasis: a Platonic theory’, in Pérez Jiménez, A., García López, J., Aguilar, R. (eds.), Plutarco, Platón y Aristóteles, Madrid, 417–430.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (2007) ‘The place of Plutarch in the history of Platonism’, in Volpe, P., Cacciatore, F., & Ferrari, F. (eds.), Plutarco e la cultura della sua età (Collectanea 25), Napoli, 281–309.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. & Steel, C. (2003) Proclus. On the Existence of Evils, London-New York.Google Scholar

Osborn, E. (1993) The Emergence of Christian Theology, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Oser-Grote, C. (2004) Aristoteles und das Corpus Hippocraticum, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Ostwald, M. (1986) From Popular Sovereignty to the Sovereignty of Law, Berkeley-Los Angeles-London.Google Scholar

Owen, G. E. L. (1986) ‘Aristotelian mechanics’, in Nussbaum, M. C. (ed.), Logic, Science, and Dialectic: Collected Papers in Greek Philosophy, London, 315–333.Google Scholar

Pagel, W. (1957) ‘The philosophy of circles – Cesalpino & Harvey’, J. Hist. Med. 12, 140–157.Google Scholar

Pagel, W. (1967) William Harvey’s Biological Ideas: Selected Aspects and Historical Background, New York.Google Scholar

Pagel, W. (1976) New Light on William Harvey, Basel.Google Scholar

Paley, W. (1802) Natural Theology, or Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, Collected from the Appearances of Nature, London.Google Scholar

Parthey, G. (1857) Iamblichus. De Mysteriis. Berlin, Reprinted: Amsterdam, 1965.Google Scholar

Pavlopoulos, M. (2003) ‘Aristotle’s natural teleology and metaphysics of life’, OSAP 24, 133–181.Google Scholar

Payne, E. F. J. (1969) Schopenhauer. The World as Will and Representation, 2 vols., New York.Google Scholar

Peck, A. L. (1942) Aristotle. Generation of Animals (Loeb Classical Library), Cambridge, MA-London.Google Scholar

Penner, T. & Kraut, R. (eds.) (1989) Nature, Knowledge and Virtue: Essays in Memory of Joan Kung (Apeiron 22.4), Edmonton.Google Scholar

Pepper, S. C. (1942) World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Perfetti, S. (2000) Aristotle’s Zoology and its Renaissance Commentators (1521–1602), Leuven.Google Scholar

Perilli, L. (2007) ‘Democritus, zoology and the physicians’, in Brancacci, A. & Morel, P.-M. (eds.), Democritus: Science, the Arts, and the Care of the Soul, Leiden, 143–79.Google Scholar

Des Places, E. (1973) Numénius. Fragments, Paris.Google Scholar

Plochmann, G. K. (1963) ‘William Harvey and his methods’, Studies in the Renaissance 10, 192–220.Google Scholar

Potter, P. (1995) Hippocrates, vol. 8 (Loeb Classical Library), Cambridge, MA-London.Google Scholar

Powers, N. (2009) ‘The natural theology of Xenophon’s Socrates’, Ancient Philosophy, 29, 249–266.Google Scholar

Price, D. (1974) ‘Gears from the Greeks: the Antikythera Mechanism – a calendar computer from ca. 80 B.C.’, Trans. Am. Phil. Soc. n.s. 64(7), 1–70.Google Scholar

Prince, B. (2014) ‘The metaphysics of bodily health and disease in Plato’s Timaeus’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22, 908–928.Google Scholar

Pritchard, P. (1995) Plato’s Philosophy of Mathematics, Sankt Augustin.Google Scholar

Pyle, A. J. (1987) ‘Animal generation and the mechanical philosophy: some light on the role of biology in the scientific revolution’, Hist. Phil. Life Sci. 9, 225–254.Google Scholar

Raalte, M. van (1988) ‘The idea of the Cosmos as an organic whole in Theophrastus’ Metaphysics’, in Fortenbaugh, W. W., Sharples, R. W. (eds.), Theophrastean Studies (RUSCH 3), New Brunswick, 189–215.Google Scholar

Raalte, M. (1993) Theophrastus. Metaphysics, Leiden.Google Scholar

Rashed, M. (2007) Essentialisme: Alexandre d’Aphrodise entre logique, physique et cosmologie, Berlin.Google Scholar

Rashed, M. (2011) Alexandre d’Aphrodise. Commentaire perdu à la Physique d’Aristote (Livres IV–VIII) (Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca et Byzantina 1), Berlin.Google Scholar

Raven, J. E. (1948) Pythagoreans and Eleatics: An Account of the Interaction between the Two Opposed Schools during the Fifth and early Fourth Centuries B.C., Cambridge.Google Scholar

Ray, J. (1691) The Wisdom of God Manifested in the Works of the Creation, London.Google Scholar

Reeve, C. D. C. (2009) ‘The naturalness of the Polis in Aristotle’, in Anagnostopoulos, G. (ed.), A Companion to Aristotle, Oxford and Hoboken, NJ, 512–525.Google Scholar

Repici, L. (1988) La natura e l’anima: saggi su Stratone di Lampsaco, Torino.Google Scholar

Roberts, W. R., Rhetoric, in Barnes, J. (ed.) The Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. 2, Princeton, 2152–2269.Google Scholar

Rose, P. L. & Drake, S (1971) ‘The Pseudo-Aristotelian Questions of Mechanics in Renaissance culture’, Studies in the Renaissance 18: 65–104. Reprinted in Drake, S. (1999), Essays on Galileo and the History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 3, Toronto, 131–169.Google Scholar

Ross, G. R. T. (1984) On Youth, Old Age, Life and Death, and Respiration, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. 1, Princeton, 745–763.Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. (1924) Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Oxford.Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. (1936) Aristotle’s Physics: A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary, Oxford.Google Scholar

Runia, D. T. & Share, M. (2008) Proclus. A Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus: Proclus on the Causes of the Cosmos and Its Creation, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Ruse, M. (2003) Darwinism and Design: Does Evolution Have a Purpose?, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Salis, R. (2005) Il commento di pseudo-Alessandro al libro Λ della Metafisica di Aristotele, Padua.Google Scholar

Sambursky, S. (1962) The Physical World of Late Antiquity, London.Google Scholar

Sambursky, S. (1963) ‘Conceptual developments and modes of explanation in late Greek scientific thought’, in Crombie, A. C. (ed.), Scientific Change, London, 61–78.Google Scholar

Scharle, M. (2008) ‘The role of material and efficient causes in Aristotle’s natural teleology’, in Mouracade, J. (ed.), Aristotle on Life (Apeiron 41.3), Edmonton, 27–46.Google Scholar

Schiefsky, M. (2005) Hippocrates. On Ancient Medicine, Leiden.Google Scholar

Schiefsky, M. (2009) ‘Structures of argument and concepts of force in the Aristotelian Mechanical Problems’, Early Sci. Med. 14, 43–67.Google Scholar

Schmitt, C. B. (1983) Aristotle and the Renaissance, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Schmitt, C. B. (1985) ‘Aristotle among the physicians’, in Wear, A., French, R. K., Lonie, I. M. (eds.), The Medical Renaissance of the Sixteenth Century, Cambridge, 1–16.Google Scholar

Schmitt, C. B. (1989) ‘William Harvey and Renaissance Aristotelianism: a consideration of the preface to De generatione animalium’, in Webster, C. (ed.), Charles Schmitt: Reappraisals of Renaissance Thought, Aldershot.Google Scholar

Schofield, M. (1980) An Essay on Anaxagoras, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Scolnicov, S. (1971) ‘On the epistemological significance of Plato’s theory of ideal numbers’, Museum Helveticum 28, 72–92.Google Scholar

Scolnicov, S. (1992) ‘What is Pythagoras doing in Plato’s Parmenides?’, in Boudouris, C. (ed.), Pythagorean Philosophy, Athens, 195–204.Google Scholar

Scolnicov, S. (2003) Plato’s Parmenides, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (1991) ‘Is Aristotle’s teleology anthropocentric?’, Phronesis 36, 179–196.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (1998) Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2000) ‘Metaphysics Λ 10’, in Frede, M. & Charles, D. (eds.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Lambda, Oxford, 327–350.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2003) Plato’s Cratylus, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2007) Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2008) ‘Socrates’ place in the history of teleology’, Elenchos 29, 317–334.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2009) ‘A Thrasyllan interpretation of Plato’s Theaetetus’, in POxy. LXXIII, 65–71.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2010) ‘Teleology, Aristotelian and Platonic’, in Lennox, J. G. & Bolton, R. (eds.), Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle, Cambridge, 5–29.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (1995) Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence, Commentary. Vol. 5: Sources on Biology, Leiden.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (2001a) ‘Dicaearchus on the soul and on divination’, in Fortenbaugh, W. W. & Schütrumpf, E. (eds.), Dicaearchus of Messana (RUSCH 10), New Brunswick, 143–173.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (2001b) ‘Schriften und Problemkomplexe zur Ethik’, in Moraux, P. & Wiesner, J. G. (ed.), Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen. Vol. 3. Alexander von Aphrodisias, Berlin, 513–616.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (2002) ‘Aristotelian theology after Aristotle’, in Frede, D. & Laks, A. (eds.), Traditions of Theology, Leiden, 1–40.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (2010a) Peripatetic Philosophy 200 BC-AD 200, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (2010b) ‘Strato of Lampsacus: the sources: texts and translations’, in Desclos, M.-L. & Fortenbaugh, W. W. (eds.), Strato of Lampsacus: Text, Translation and Discussion (RUSCH 16), New Brunswick, 5–229.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (2015) ‘Form and matter in Theophrastus’ Metaphysics’, in Jaulin, A. & Lefebvre, D. (eds.), La ‘métaphysique’ de Théophraste: principes et apories, Leuven, 71–88.Google Scholar

Shorey, P. (1957) Plato. Republic, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Siegel, R. E. (1973) Galen on Psychology, Psychopathology, and Function and Diseases of the Nervous System, Basel.Google Scholar

Singer, P. N. (1991), ‘Aspects of Galen’s Platonism’, in López-Férez, J. A. (eds.), Galeno: Obra, Pensamiento, E Influencia, Madrid, 41–55.Google Scholar

Singer, P. N. (1997) Galen. Selected Works, Oxford.Google Scholar

Smith, J. A. (1984) On the Soul, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. 1, Princeton, 641–692.Google Scholar

Smith, M. F. (2001) Lucretius. On the Nature of Things, Indianapolis.Google Scholar

Smith, W. D (1979) The Hippocratic Tradition, Ithaca-London. Electronic edition, revised, 2002.Google Scholar

Smith, W. D (1994) Hippocrates, vol. 7 (Loeb Classical Library), Cambridge, MA-London.Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. (1980) Necessity, Cause and Blame, London.Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. (2004) The Philosophy of the Commentators, 200–600 AD, London.Google Scholar

Staden, H. (1987) Herophilus: The Art of Medicine in Early Alexandria, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Staden, H. (1990) ‘Incurability and hopelessness: the Hippocratic Corpus’, in Potter, P., Maloney, G., Desautels, J. (eds.), La maladie et les maladies dans la Collection Hippocratique, Québec, 75–112.Google Scholar

Staden, H. (1997) ‘Teleology and mechanism: Aristotelian biology and early Hellenistic medicine’, in Kullmann, W. & Föllinger, S. (eds.), Aristotelische Biologie. Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse, Stuttgart, 183–208.Google Scholar

Strickland, L. (2006) The Shorter Leibniz Texts: A Collection of New Translations, London.Google Scholar

Tarrant, H. (2009) ‘Living by the Cratylus: hermeneutics and philosophic names in the Roman Empire’, International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 3, 1–25.Google Scholar

Taub, L. (2008) Aetna and the Moon: Explaining Nature in Ancient Greece and Rome, Corvallis, OR.Google Scholar

Tieleman, T. (2002) ‘Galen on the seat of the intellect: anatomical experiment and philosophical tradition’, in Tuplin, C. J. & Rihll, T. (eds.), Science and Mathematics in Ancient Greek Culture, Oxford, 254–273.Google Scholar

Tieleman, T. (2005) ‘Galen and Genesis’, in Van Kooten, G. H. (ed.), The Creation of Heaven and Hell, Leiden, 125–145.Google Scholar

Tracy, T. J. (1969) Physiological Theory and the Doctrine of the Mean in Plato and Aristotle, The Hague-Paris, 119–135.Google Scholar

Tredennick, H. & Tarrant, H. (1993) Plato: The Last Days of Socrates, London.Google Scholar

Vallance, J. (1988) ‘Theophrastus and the study of the intractable: scientific method in De lapidibus and De igne’, in Fortenbaugh, W. W. & Sharples, R. S. (eds.), Theophrastean Studies (RUSCH 3), New Brunswick, 25–40.Google Scholar

Vander Waerdt, P. A. (1994) ‘Introduction’, in Vander Waerdt, P. A. (ed.), The Socratic Movement, Ithaca.Google Scholar

Vander Waerdt, P. A. (1994) ‘Socrates in the Clouds’, in Vander Waerdt, P. A. (ed.), The Socratic Movement, Ithaca, 48–86.Google Scholar

Vegetti, M. (2015) ‘Galeno, il “divinissimo” Platone, e I Platone’, Revista di storia della Filosofia, 70 (2), 447–472.Google Scholar

Verdenius, W. J. (1960) ‘Traditional and personal elements in Aristotle’s religion’, Phronesis 5, 56–70.Google Scholar

Vlastos, G. (1991) Socrates: Ironist and Moral Philosopher, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Vlastos, G. (1994) Socratic Studies, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Von Staden, H. (1989). Herophilus. The Art of Medicine in Early Alexandria, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Waanders, F. M. J. (1976) ‘ΤΕΛΟΣ in tragedy: some remarks’, in Bremer, J. M., Radt, S. L., & Ruijgh, C. J. (eds.), Miscellanea Tragica, Amsterdam, 475–482.Google Scholar

Waanders, F. M. J. (1983) The History of τέλος and τελέω in Ancient Greek, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Wardy, R. (1993) ‘Aristotelian rainfall or the lore of averages’, Phronesis 38, 18–30.Google Scholar

Warren, J. (2007) Presocratics: Natural Philosophers before Socrates, London.Google Scholar

Waterlow, S. (1982) Nature, Change, and Agency in Aristotle’s Physics, Oxford.Google Scholar

Westerink, L. G. (1985) Stephani Atheniensis in Hippocratis Aphorismos commentaria I, I–II. (CMG XI 1,3,1), Berlin.Google Scholar

Wharton, T. (1656) Adenographia, London.Google Scholar

White, J. S. (1986) ‘William Harvey and the primacy of the blood’, Ann. Sci. 43, 252–254.Google Scholar

Whitehead, A. N. (1933) Adventures of Ideas, New York.Google Scholar

Whitteridge, G. (1959), William Harvey’s De motu locali Animalium, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Whitteridge, G. (1964) The Anatomical Lectures of William Harvey, Edinburgh-London.Google Scholar

Whitteridge, G. (1971) William Harvey and the Circulation of the Blood, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Whitteridge, G. (1981) William Harvey. Disputations Touching the Generation of Animals, London.Google Scholar

Wieland, W. (1962/1992) Die aristotelischen Physik, Göttingen.Google Scholar

Wilkie, J. S. (1965) ‘Harvey’s immediate debt to Aristotle and Galen’, History of Science 4, 103–24.Google Scholar

Wood, A. W. (1992) ‘Rational theology, moral faith, and religion’, in Guyer, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant, Cambridge, 394–416.Google Scholar

Woodfield, A (1976) Teleology, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Woodhead, W. D. (1987) Gorgias, in Hamilton, E. & Cairns, H. (eds.), The Collected Dialogues of Plato, Princeton.Google Scholar

Wright, L. (1976) Teleological Explanations, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Young, J. (1987) Willing and Unwilling: A Study in the Philosophy of Arthur Schopenhauer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Zeyl, D. J. (1997) ‘Timaeus’, in Cooper, D. J., Hutchinson, D. S. (eds.), Plato. Complete Works, Indianapolis, 12249–12291.Google Scholar