Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T12:53:48.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Popper and His Philosophy: An Overview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2016

By
Geoffrey Stokes  and
Jeremy Shearmur
Edited by
Jeremy Shearmur  and
Geoffrey Stokes
Jeremy Shearmur
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Geoffrey Stokes
Affiliation:
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Companion to Popper , pp. 1 - 29
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agassi, J. 1966. ‘Sensationalism’, Mind New Series, 75, No. 297, pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartley, W. 1964. Retreat to Commitment. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Bartley, W. 1968. ‘Goodman’s Paradox: A Simple-Minded Solution’, Philosophical Studies 19, No. 6, pp. 85–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartley, W. 1984. Retreat to Commitment, second revised edition. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Berkson, W. and Wettersten, J. 1984. Learning from Error: Karl Popper’s Psychology of Learning. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Caldwell, B. 2006. ‘Popper and Hayek: Who Influenced Whom?’, in Jarvie, Ian, Milford, Karl and Miller, David (eds.), Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment, volume I. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 111–24.Google Scholar
D’Agostino, F. and Jarvie, I. (eds.) 1989. Freedom and Rationality: Essays in Honor of John Watkins. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisby, D. 1976. ‘Introduction to the English Translation’, in Adorno, Theodor et al. (eds.), The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology, London: Heinemann Educational, pp. ix–xliv.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. 1954. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. London: University of London Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Hacohen, M. 2000. Karl Popper: The Formative Years 1902–1945, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hacohen, M. 2006. ‘The Young Popper as a Scholarly Field: A Comment on Dahms, Hansen, and ter Hark’, in Jarvie, Ian, Milford, Karl and Miller, David (eds.), Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment, volume I. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 94–110.Google Scholar
Hansen, T. 2006. ‘Which Came First, the Problem of Induction or the Problem of Demarcation?’, in Jarvie, Ian, Milford, Karl and Miller, David (eds.), Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment, volume I. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 67–81.Google Scholar
Howson, C. 1991. ‘The Last Word on Induction?’, Erkenntnis 34, No. 1, pp. 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, I. 1974. ‘Popper on Demarcation and Induction’, in Schilpp, P. A. (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper. La Salle, IL: Open Court, pp. 241–73.Google Scholar
Lakatos, I. 1978. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, ed. Worrall, John and Currie, Gregory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. 1994. Critical Rationalism: A Restatement and Defence. Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Miller, D. 2006. Out of Error: Further Essays on Critical Rationalism. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Musgrave, A. 1999. Essays on Realism and Rationalism. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oddie, G. 2014. ‘Truthlikeness’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), at http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/truthlikeness/.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1930–33. Die beiden Grundprobleme der Erkenntnistheorie (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1934. Logik der Forschung. Vienna: Julius Springer.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1940. ‘What Is Dialectic’, Mind New Series 49, No. 196, pp. 403–26.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1945. The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1957a. ‘The propensity interpretation of the calculus of probability, and the quantum theory’, in S. Körner (ed.), Observation and Interpretation. Proceedings of the 9th Symposium of the Colston Research Society, University of Bristol, 1–4 April 1957. London: Butterworths. (Colston Papers 9), pp. 65–70, 88–89.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1957b. The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1963. Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1972. Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1974a. ‘Autobiography of Karl Popper’, in Schilpp, P. A. (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper. La Salle, IL: Open Court, pp. 1–181.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1974b. ‘Replies to My Critics’, in Schilpp, P. A. (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper. La Salle, IL: Open Court, pp. 961–1197.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1976. Unended Quest. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1979. Die beiden Grundprobleme der Erkenntnistheorie, ed. Hansen, Troels Eggers. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1982a. Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics, ed. W. W. Bartley III. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1982b. The Open Universe, ed. W. W. Bartley III. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1983. Realism and the Aim of Science, ed. Bartley, W. W. III, London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1985. Popper Selections, ed. Miller, David. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1994. The Myth of the Framework, ed. M. A. Notturno. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 2008. After the Open Society, ed. J. Shearmur and P. Turner. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Popper, K and Eccles, J. 1977. The Self and Its Brain. New York: Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K and Miller, D. 1983. ‘A Proof of the Impossibility of Inductive Probability’, Nature 302, 21 April, pp. 687–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K and Miller, D. 1987. ‘Why Probabilistic Support Is Not Inductive’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A 321(1562), 30 April, pp. 569–91.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 1946. A History of Western Philosophy. London: Unwin.Google Scholar
Salmon, W. 1968. ‘The Justification of Inductive Rules of Inference’, in Lakatos, I. (ed.), The Problem of Inductive Logic, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 24–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, W. 1981. ‘Rational Prediction’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 32, pp. 115–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shearmur, J. 1996. The Political Thought of Karl Popper. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shearmur, J. 2006. ‘The Logic of Scientific Discovery’, in Shand, J. (ed.), Central Works of Philosophy: Volume 4: The Twentieth Century: Moore to Popper. Chesham, Bucks: Acumen, pp. 262–86.Google Scholar
Stokes, G. 1998. Popper: Philosophy, Politics and Scientific Method. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, G. 2006. ‘Karl Popper’s Revisionist/Realist Theory of Democracy’, in Jarvie, Ian, Milford, Karl and Miller, David (eds.), Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment, volume I. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 217–30.Google Scholar
ter Hark, M. 2004. Popper, Otto Selz and the Rise of Evolutionary Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
ter Hark, M. 2006. ‘The Historical Roots of Popper’s Theory of Searchlight’, in Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment, ed. by Ian Jarvie, Karl Milford and David Miller. 3 vols. Hants, England: Ashgate Pub. Ltd. 1, pp. 37–56.Google Scholar
Watkins, J. 1984. Science and Scepticism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, J. 1991. ‘Scientific Rationality and the Problem of Induction: Responses to Criticisms’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42, pp. 343–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, J. 1995a. ‘How I Almost Solved the Problem of Induction’, Philosophy 70, pp. 429–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, J. 1995b. ‘Review of David Miller, Critical Rationalism’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46, pp. 610–16.Google Scholar
Wettersten, J. 1992. The Roots of Critical Rationalism. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wettersten, J. 2005. ‘New Insights on Young Popper’, Journal of the History of Ideas 66(4), pp. 603–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahar, E. 2007. ‘Métaphysique et induction’, Philosophia scientiae 11 (1), pp. 45–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×