Abadi, S. H. & Karimnia, A. 2003. A sociolinguistic study of Kashkay Turkic and its gradual extinction. Turkic Languages 7: 144–145.Google Scholar

Abdullaev, F. A. 1980. Po povodu singarmonizma v tjurkskix jazykax [On the occurrence of synharmony in Turkic]. In Šukurov, Š. ed. Issledovanija po leksike i grammatike tjurkskix jazykov. Taškent: Federal’noj Agentstvo Novostej Uzbekskoj SSR. 3–22.Google Scholar

Abish, A. 2016. Modality in Kazakh as Spoken in China (Turcologica 107). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Abish, A. & Csató, É. Á. 2011. Recent developments in Kazakh as spoken in the People’s Republic of China. Turkic Languages 15: 275–290.Google Scholar

Adamović, M. 1983. Der tschuwaschische Plural -sem [The Chuvash plural -sem]. Finnisch-Ugrische Mitteilungen 7: 21–27.Google Scholar

Adamović, M. 1985. Konjugationsgeschichte der türkischen Sprache [The Conjugational History of Turkish]. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Ağcagül, S. 2009. Aktionale Operatoren im Türkischen mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Türkei- und Irantürkischen [Actional operators in Turkish with special reference to Turkish and Iran Turkic]. Doctoral dissertation. University of Mainz. http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-4482Google Scholar

Agyagási, K. 1997. The theoretical possibilities of the chronological interpretation of Cheremiss loanwords in Chuvash. In Berta, Á. ed. Historical and Linguistic Interaction between Inner-Asia and Europe (Studia uralo-altaica 39). Szeged: University of Szeged. 1–10.Google Scholar

Agyagási, K. 1998. On the characteristics of Cheremiss linguistic inference on Chuvash. In Johanson, L. et al. eds. The Mainz Meeting. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Turkish Linguistics (Turcologica 34). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 667–682.Google Scholar

Agyagási, K. 2018. Chuvash Historical Phonetics (Turcologica 117). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, A. Y. 2017. Commands. A cross-linguistic view. In Aikhenvald, A. Y. & Dixon, R. M. W. eds. Commands. A Cross-Linguistic Typology. (Explorations in Linguistic Typology). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1–45.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, A. Y. & Dixon, R. M. W. eds. 2013. Possession and Ownership. A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aksoy, Ö. A. 1945–1946. Gaziantep ağzı [The Dialect of Gaziantep]. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu.Google Scholar

Allworth, E. 1971. Nationalities of the Soviet East. Publications and Writing Systems. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Amansaryev, Ž. 1970. Türkmen Dialektologijasy [Turkmen Dialectology]. Ašgabat: Türkmenistan.Google Scholar

Anderson, G. D. 2001. Subject version and object version in Tofa auxiliary verb constructions. Turkic Languages 5: 245–269.Google Scholar

Anderson, G. D. S. 2004. Present tense formations in Altai-Sayan Turkic: Khakas. In Anderson, G. D. S. ed. Auxiliary Verb Constructions in Altai-Sayan Turkic (Turcologica 51). Wiesbaden:Harrassowitz. 41–52.Google Scholar

Anderson, G. D. & Harrison, K. D. 1999. Tyvan (Languages of the World. Materials 257). München & Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

Anderson, G. D. S. & Harrison, K. D. 2006. Ös tilı: Towards a comprehensive documentation of Middle and Upper Chulym dialects. Turkic Languages 10: 47–71.Google Scholar

Andrews, P. A. ed. 1989. Ethnic Groups in the Republic of Turkey (Tübinger Atlas des Vorderen Orients B 60). Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar

Anhegger, R. 1980. Hurufumuz Yunanca. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der karamanisch-türkischen Literatur [Our letters are Greek. A contribution to the study of the Karaman literature]. Anatolica 7: 157–202.Google Scholar

Anhegger, R. 1983. Nachträge zu Hurufumuz Yunanca [Additions to Hurufumuz Yunanca]. Anatolica 10: 149–164.Google Scholar

Arat, R. R. 1979. Kutadgu bilig [Prosperous Knowledge]. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu.Google Scholar

Arslanov, L. Š. 1997a. Astraxanskix nogajcev-karagašej jazyk [The Astrakhan Noghay-Karagash language]. In Tenišev, Ė. R. ed. Jazyki mira. Tjurkskie jazyki. Moscow: Indrik. 187–194.Google Scholar

Arslanov, L. Š. 1997b. Jurtovskix tatar jazyk [The Yurtov Tatar language]. In Tenišev, Ė. R. ed. Jazyki mira. Tjurkskie jazyki. Moscow: Indrik. 506–513.Google Scholar

Aslan Demir, S. 2018. Written and spoken Turkmen. In Csató, et al. eds. Building Bridges to Turkish (Turcologica 116). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 33–38.Google Scholar

Ašmarin, N. I. 1928–1950. Thesaurus linguae Tschuvaschorum. Slovar’ čuvašskogo jazyka 17 [Thesaurus of the Language of the Chuvash. The Chuvash Lexicon 17]. Kazan’: Izdanie narodnogo komissariata po prosveščeniju Čuvašskoj Avtonomnoj Sovetskoj Socialističeskoj Respubliki. [Reprint 1950: Čeboksary: Chuvašskoe Gosudarstvennoe Izdatel’stvo.]Google Scholar

Atwood, C. P. 2012. Huns and Xiōngnú: New thoughts on an old problem. In Boeck, B. J. & Martin, R. E. & Rowland, D. eds. 2012. Dubitando. Studies in History and Culture in Honor of Donald Ostrowski. Bloomington: Slavica Publishers. 27–52.Google Scholar

Atwood, C. P. 2015. The Qai, Khongai, and the names of the Xiōngnú. International Journal of Eurasian Studies 2: 35–63.Google Scholar

Aydemir, İ. A. 2009. Konverbien im Tuwinischen. Eine Untersuchung unter Berücksichtigung des Altai-Dialekts [Converbs in Tuvan. An Exposition Based on the Altai Dialect] (Turcologica 80). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Aydemir, İ. A. 2017. Tsengel tuvaları arasında bir alan araştırmaları: MOTUV-DER projesi ve ilk dilbilimsel sonuçları [A fieldwork among the Tsengel Tuvans: The MOTUV-DER Project and its first linguistic results]. In Aydemir, İ. A. & Erdem, Mevlüt eds. Tuva Araştırmaları. Tuvan Studies. Ankara: Grafiker.Google Scholar

Azmun, Y. 1966. Türkmen halk edebiyatı hakkında [On Turkmen folk literature]. In Reşid Rahmeti Arat için (Türk Kültürünü Araştırma Enstitüsü). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi. 32–83.Google Scholar

Bajčura, U. Š. 1959. Zvukovoj stroj tatarskogo jazyka 1 [The Sound System of Tatar 1]. Kazan’: Izdatel’stvo Kazanskogo Universiteta.Google Scholar

Bajčura, U. Š. 1971. Instrumentalnye dannye ob udarenii i intonacii v altajskix jazykax [Instrumental facts on accent and intonation in the Altaic languages]. In Problema obščnosti altajskix jazykov. Leningrad: Nauka. 279–292.Google Scholar

Balta, E. 1987a. Karamanlidika. XX’ siècle [Karaman Texts of the 20th Century]. Athènes: Centre d’Études d’Asie Mineure.Google Scholar

Balta, E. 1987b. Karamanlidika. Additions (1584–1900) [Karaman texts. Additions (1584–1900)]. Athènes: Centre d’Études d’Asie Mineure.Google Scholar

Balta, E. 1997. Karamanlidika. Nouvelles additions et compléments (Karaman texts. New additions and complements]. Athènes: Centre d’Études d’Asie Mineure.Google Scholar

Bang, W. 1917. Vom Köktürkischen zum Osmanischen. Vorarbeiten zu einer vergleichenden Grammatik des Türkischen 1 [From Köktürk to Ottoman. Preliminaries to a Comparative Grammar of Turkic 1] (Abhandlungen der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Philosophisch-historische Klasse 6). Berlin: Verlag der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

Bartens, R. 1979. Mordvan, tseremissin ja votjakin konjugaation infiniitisten muotojen syntaksi [Syntax of Infinite Forms of Conjugation in Mordvin, Mari, and Votjak] (Mitteilungen des Seminars für Orientalische Sprachen in Berlin 170). Helsinki.Google Scholar

Barthold, W. 1928 ². Turkestan Down to the Mongol Invasion. Oxford: Luzac & Co.Google Scholar

Barthold, W. 1945. Histoire des Turcs d’Asie Centrale [The History of the Turks in Middle Asia]. Paris: Librairie d’Amerique et d’Orient.Google Scholar

Barthold, W. 1956. Four Studies on the History of Central Asia. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar

Bartold, V. 1934. Sart. In Encyclopedia of Islam 4. Leiden & London. 175–176.Google Scholar

Baskakov, N. A. 1940. Nogajskij jazyk i ego dialekty. Grammatika, teksty i slovar’ [Noghay and its Dialects. Grammar, Texts and Lexicon]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar

Baskakov, N. A. 1951–1952. Karakalpakskij jazyk. Materialy po dialektologii [Karakalpak. Materials on Dialectology]. Moscow: Izdateľstvo Akademii Nauk SSSR.Google Scholar

Baskakov, N. A. 1952. K voprosu o klassifikacii tjurskix jazykov [On the Question of the Classification of Turkic]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar

Baskakov, N. A. 1958. Altajskij jazyk [The Altay Language]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar

Baskakov, N. A. 1959a. La classification des dialectes de la langue turque d’Altaï [The Classification of the Dialects of the Turkic language of Altay]. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 8: 9–15.Google Scholar

Baskakov, N. A. 1959b. O proekte edinoj fonetičeskoj transkripcii dlja tjurkskix jazykov [On the Project of a Common Phonetic Transcription for Turkic]. Moscow: Institut Jazykoznanija, Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar

Baskakov, N. A. 1966. Jazyki narodov SSSR 2: Tjurskie jazyki [The Languages of the Peoples of the SSSR, 2. The Turkic Languages]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar

Baskakov, N. A. 1968. Türk dilleri genel fonetik transkripsiyonu üzerine [On a General Phonetic Transcription for Turkic]. In XI. Türk Dil Kurultayında okunan bilimsel bildiriler. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu. 53–59.Google Scholar

Baskakov, N. A. 1969. Vvedenie v izučenie tjurkskix jazykov [Introduction to the Study of Turkic]. Moscow: Vysšaja Skola.Google Scholar

Baskakov, N. A. 1972a. Dialekt kumandincev (Kumandy-kiži). Grammatičeskij očerk, teksty, perevody i slovar’: Severnyje dialekty altajskogo (ojrotskogo) jazyka [The Dialect of the Kumandins. Grammatical Structure, Texts, Translations, and Vocabulary: The Northern Dialects of the Altay (Oyrot) Language]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar

Baskakov, N. A. 1972b. O sovremennom sostojanii i dalnejšem soveršenstvovanii alfavitov tjurkskix jazykov narodov SSSR [On the present situation and further development of the alphabets of the Turkic languages of the peoples of the SSSR]. Voprosy Jazykoznanija 5: 33–46.Google Scholar

Baskakov, N. A. ed. et al. 1975. Grammatika xakasskogo jazyka [Khakas Grammar]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar

Baskakov, N. A. 1976a. Problema soveršenstvovanija i unifikacii alfavitov tjurkskix jazykov narodov SSSR [The problem of the development and unification of the alphabets of the Turkic languages of the SSSR]. In Sovetskaja tjurkologija i razvitie tjurkskix jazykov v SSSR. Tezisy dokladov i soobščenij. Vsesojuznaja tjurkologičeskaja konferencija, 27–29 sentjabrja 1976 g. Alma-Ata. 14–16.Google Scholar

Baskakov, N. A. 1976b. O edinoj unificirovannoj fonetičeskoj transkripcii dlja tjurkskix jazykov (variant na latinskoj osnove) [On a Common Unified Phonetic Transcription for Turkic (Latin Variant)]. Alma-Ata.Google Scholar

Baskakov, N. A. & Inkižekova-Grekul, A. I. 1953. Xakasskij jazyk [The Khakas language]. In Baskakov, N. A. & Inkižekova-Grekul, A. I. 1953a. Xakassko-russkij slovar’. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo inostrannyx i nacional‘nyx slovarej. 361–487.Google Scholar

Bazin, L. 1959a. Structures et tendances communes des langues turques [The Common Structures and Trends of Turkic]. In Deny, J. et al. eds. 1959: 11–19.Google Scholar

Bazin, L. 1959b. Le Turkmène [Turkmen]. In Deny, J. et al. eds. 1959: 308–317.Google Scholar

Bazin, L. 1961. Y a-t-il en turc des alternances vocaliques? [Does Turkic have vowel alternations?]. Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher 33: 1–2.Google Scholar

Bazin, L. 1968. Le problème des consonnes géminées en turc ancien (avant l’introduction des caractères arabes) [The problem of geminated consonants in Old Turkic (before the introduction of Arabic letters)]. Rocznik Orientalistyczny 31: 65–70.Google Scholar

Bazin, L. 1991. Les systèmes chronologiques dans le monde turc ancien [The Chronological Systems in the Old Turkic World] (Bibliotheca Orientalis Hungarica 34). Budapest & Paris: Akadémiai & CNRS.Google Scholar

Bazin, L. & Bombaci, A. & Deny, J. & Gökbilgin, T. & İz, F. & Scheel, H. 1964. Philologiae turcicae fundamenta 2, edited by Boratav, P. N. Aquis Mattiacis: Steiner.Google Scholar

Beck, L. 1986. The Qashqai of Iran. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Beckwith, C. I. 2005. The Chinese names of the Tibetans, Tabghatch, and Türks. Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi 14: 5–20.Google Scholar

Beckwith, C. I. 2011 Empires of the Silk Road. A History of Central Eurasia from the Bronze Age to the Present. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Beckwith, C. 2016. The pronunciation, origin and meaning of A-shih-na in Early Old Turkic. In Zimonyi, I. & Karatay, O. eds. 2016. Central Eurasia in the Middle Ages. Studies in Honour of Peter B. Golden (Turcologica 104). Wiesbaden: Harrrassowitz. 39–46.Google Scholar

Bellér-Hann, I. 1995. A History of Cathay: A Translation and Linguistic Analysis of a Fifteenth-Century Turkic Manuscript. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar

Benzing, J. 1953a. Einführung in das Studium der altaischen Philologie und der Turkologie [Introduction to the Study of Altaic Philology and Turcology]. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Benzing, J. 1953b. Remarques sur les langues tongouses et leurs relations avec les autres langues dites “altaiques” [Remarks on the Tungus languages and their relations to the other languages called ‘Altaicʼ]. Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher 25: 109–118. [Reprinted in Johanson & Schönig eds. 1988: 49.]Google Scholar

Benzing, J. 1955. Lamutische Grammatik mit Bibliographie, Sprachproben und Glossar [Lamut Grammar with Bibliography, Samples and Vocabulary]. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar

Benzing, J. 1956. Die tungusischen Sprachen – Versuch einer vergleichenden Grammatik [The Tungus Languages. Attempt on a Comparative Grammar]. Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur.Google Scholar

Benzing, J. 1959a. Das Baschkirische [Bashkir]. In Deny, J. et al. eds. 1959: 421–434.Google Scholar

Benzing, J. 1959b. Das Hunnische, Donaubolgarische und Wolgabolgarische (Sprachreste) [Hunnic, Danubian Bolgar, Volga Bolgar (Language Rests)]. In Deny, J. et al. eds. 1959: 685–695.Google Scholar

Benzing, J. 1959c. Das Kumükische [Kumyk]. In Deny, Jet al. eds. 1959: 391–406.Google Scholar

Benzing, J. 1959d. Das Tschuwaschische [Chuvash]. In Deny, J. et al. eds. 1959: 695–751.Google Scholar

Benzing, J. 1959e. Classification of the Turkic languages. In Deny, J. et al. eds. 1959: 1–10.Google Scholar

Benzing, J. 1980. Review of Tekin, T. A Grammar of Orkhon Turkic. Bloomington 1968. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 130: 116–120.Google Scholar

Benzing, J. 1983. Chwarezmischer Wortindex [Khwarezmian Glossal Index]. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Bereczki, G. 1979. Tschuwassische Kasussuffixe im Tscheremissischen [Chuvash case suffixes in Mari]. Gläser, In, Chr. & Pusztay, J. eds. Festschrift für Wolfgang Schlachter zum 70. Geburtstag (Veröffentlichungen der Societas Uralo-Altaica 12). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Bereczki, G. 1994. Grundzüge der tscheremissischen Sprachgeschichte 1 [Basic Traits of the Mari Language History] (Studia uralo-altaica 35). Szeged: University of Szeged.Google Scholar

Bérézin, J. 1848. Recherches sur les dialectes musulmans 1. Système des dialectes turcs [Studies on the Islamic Dialects 1. The System of the Turkic Dialects]. Kazan’: L’Imprimerie de l’Université.Google Scholar

Bergel’son, M. B. & Kibrik, A. A. 1987. Sistema pereključenija referencii v tuvinskom jazyke [The switch reference system in Tuvan]. Sovjetskaja Tjurkologija 2: 16–32; 4: 30–45.Google Scholar

Bergsträßer, G. 1918. Zur Phonetik des Türkischen nach gebildeter Konstantinopler Aussprache [On the phonetics of Turkish in the educated Constantinople pronunciation]. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 72: 233–262.Google Scholar

Berta, Á. 1989. Lautgeschichte der tatarischen Dialekte [Sound History of the Tatar Dialects] (Studia uralo-altaica 31). Szeged: University of Szeged.Google Scholar

Berta, Á. 1998a. West Kipchak languages. In Johanson & Csató eds. 1998: 301–317.Google Scholar

Berta, Á. 1998b. Tatar and Bashkir. In Johanson. L. & Csató, É. Á. eds. 1998: 283–300.Google Scholar

Bičeldej, K. A. 1999. Faringalizacija v tuvinskom jazyke [Pharyngalization in Tuvan]. Kyzyl: Tipografija Tyvinskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta.Google Scholar

Bičeldey, K. A. & Nasilov, D. M. 2002. Tuvincev-todžincev jazyk [The Tuvan-Toja Language]. In Neroznak, V. P. ed. Jazyki narodov Rossii. Krasnaja kniga. Moscow: Nauka. 193–196.Google Scholar

Bickel, B. 1991. Typologische Grundlagen der Satzverkettung [Bases of clause linking]. Dissertation. University of Zürich.Google Scholar

Birjukovič, R. M. 1984. Leksika čulymsko-tjurkskogo jazyka [The Lexicon of the Chulym Turkic Language]. Saratov: Izdatel’stvo Saratovskogo Universiteta.Google Scholar

Bisang, W. 1998. Structural similarities of clause combining in Turkic, Mongolian, Manchu-Tungusic and Japanese – A typological alternative to the hypothesis to a genetic relationship. In Johanson, L. ed. The Mainz Meeting. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 199–223.Google Scholar

Bläsing, U. 1984. Die finit-indikativischen Verbalformen im Kalmückischen: Untersuchungen ihrer Anwendung und ihrer Abgrenzung voneinander [The Finite Indicative Verb Forms in Kalmyk. Studies on Their Use and Delimitations] (Veröffentlichungen der Orientalischen Kommission / Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur 36). Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar

Bläsing, U. 1992. Armenisches Lehngut im Türkeitürkischen. Am Beispiel von Hemşin [Armenian Loans in Turkish. Examples from Hemshin]. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bläsing, U. 1995. Armenisch-Türkisch. Etymologische Betrachtungen ausgehend von Materialien aus dem Hemşingebiet nebst einigen Anmerkungen zum Armenischen, insbesondere dem Hemşindialekt [Armenian-Turkish. Etymological Considerations Based on Materials from the Hemshin Area and Notes of Armenian, Especially on the Hemshin Dialect]. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bläsing, U. 1998. Armeno-Turcica. Etymologische Untersuchungen anhand von Materialien aus dem Hemşingebiet [Etymological Studies to Materials from the Hemshin Area]. Studia Turcologica Cracoviensia 5: 41–63.Google Scholar

Bodrogligeti, A. 1970. A Fourteenth-Century Turkic Translation of Sa‛dī’s Gulistān. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar

Boeschoten, H. 1994. Chwaresmtürkisch als z-Türkisch [Khwarezmian Turkic as z-Turkic]. Journal of Turcology 1: 183–193.Google Scholar

Boeschoten, H. 2009. Alexander Stories in Ajami Turkic (Turcologica 75). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Boeschoten, H. & Johanson, L. eds. 2006. Turkic Languages in Contact (Turcologica 61). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Böhtlingk, O. 1851. Über die Sprache der Jakuten. Grammatik, Text und Wörterbuch (Dr. A. Th. v. Middendorff’s Reise in den äussersten Norden und Osten Sibiriens 3) [About the Language of the Yakuts. Grammar, Text, and Glossary (Middendorf’s Travel into the North and East Parts of Siberia)]. St. Petersburg: Buchdruckerei der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften. [Reprint 1964: The Hague: Mouton & Co. (Indiana University Publications. Uralic and Altaic Series 35.)]Google Scholar

Bold, L. 1968. Osobennosti ujguro-urjanxajskogo jazyka [Features of the Uyghur-Uryangkhai language]. Avtoreferat. Ulan-Bator: Akademija Nauk, Institut Jazyka i Literatury.Google Scholar

Bombaci, A. 1952. Probleme der historischen Lautlehre der türkischen Sprache 1 [Problems of the historical phonetics of Turkic 1]. Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher 24: 3–4, 89–105.Google Scholar

Borcakov, A. & Sarihanov, M. & Söyegov, M. & Hocayev, B. & Ärnazarov, S. 2000. Türkmen diliniñ grammatikası: Morfologiya [The Grammar of Turkmen: Morphology]. Ankara: Ruh.Google Scholar

Boretzky, N. 1978. Review of Symeonidis, Ch. 1976. Der Vokalismus der griechischen Lehnwörter im Türkischen. Amsterdam: Haekkert. Zeitschrift für Balkanologie 14: 208–2011.Google Scholar

Borovkov, A. K. 1952. Tadžiksko-uzbekskoe dvujazyčie i vzaimootnošenija uzbekskogo i tadžikskogo jazykov [Tajik-Uzbek bilingualism and the interrelations of Uzbek and Tajik]. Učenie Zapiski Instituta Vostokovedenija 4: 165–200.Google Scholar

Bozkurt, M. F. 1975. Untersuchungen zum Boǰnurd-Dialekt des Chorasantürkischen [Studies on the Khorasan Turkic dialect of Boǰnurd]. Dissertation. University Göttingen.Google Scholar

Brands, H. W. 1972. Studien zum Wortbestand der Türksprachen [Studies on the Lexicon of Turkic]. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Braun, F. & Haig, G. 2000. The noun/adjective distinction in Turkish. An empirical approach. In Göksel, A. & Kerslake, C. eds. 2000. Studies on Turkish and Turkic languages (Turcologica 46). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 85–92.Google Scholar

Brendemoen, B. 1993. Pronominalsyntax in den türkischen Schwarzmeerdialekten – syntaktische Innovation oder Archaismus? [Pronominal Syntax in the Turkish Dialects, Black Sea, Innovation or Archaism?] In Laut, J. P. & Kl, Röhrborn. eds. 1993. Sprach- und Kulturkontakte der türkischen Völker. Materialien der zweiten deutschen Turkologen-Konferenz (Veröffentlichungen der Societas Uralo-Altaica 37). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 51–73.Google Scholar

Brendemoen, B. 1996. Case merge in the Black Sea dialects. A Kartvelian substrate feature? In Berta, Á. & Brendemoen, B. & Cl, Schönig. eds. Symbolae Turcologicae. Studies in Honour of Lars Johanson. (Transactions 6). Stockholm: Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul. 41–59.Google Scholar

Brendemoen, B. 1999. Greek and Turkish Language Encounters in Anatolia. In Brendemoen, B. & Lanza, E. & Ryen, E. eds. Language Encounters Across Time and Space. Oslo: Novus. 353–378.Google Scholar

Brendemoen, B. 2002. The Turkish Dialects of Trabzon 1–2 (Turcologica 50). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Brockelmann, C. 1916 Zur Grammatik des Osmanisch-Türkischen [On the Ottoman Turkish Grammar]. Leipzig: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Brockelmann, C. 1917. ’Alī’s Qişşa’i Jūsuf, der älteste Vorläufer der osmanischen Literatur [’Alī’s Qişşa’i Jūsuf, the Oldest Forerunner of the Ottoman Literature]. Berlin: Königliche Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

Brockelmann, C. 1954. Osttürkische Grammatik der islamischen Litteratursprachen Mittelasiens [East Turkic Grammar of the Islamic Literary Languages of Middle Asia]. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Buder, A. 1989 Aspekto-temporale Kategorien im Jakutischen [Aspect-Tense Categories in Yakut] (Turcologica 5). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Budup, B. K. 1979. O tuvinskix faringalizovannyx glasnyx [On Tuvan Pharyngialized Vowels]. In Problemy jazykov Azii i Afriki (fonetika, morfologija, sintaksis, semantika). Moscow: Nauka. 84–93.Google Scholar

Bühler, K. 1934. Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache [Linguistic Theory. The Descriptive Function of the Language]. Jena: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar

Bulut, Chr. 1997. Evliya Çelebis Reise von Bitlis nach Van. Ein Auszug aus dem Seyahatname [Evliya Çelebi’s Travel from Bitlis to Van] (Turcologica 35). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Bulut, Chr. 1998. Copied strategies of clause combining. Turkic Languages 2: 171–197.Google Scholar

Bulut, Chr. 1999. Klassifikatorische Merkmale des Iraktürkischen [Classificational Features of Iraq Turkic]. Orientalia Suecana 48: 5–27.Google Scholar

Bulut, Chr. 2003. Pronominal systems in the transitional varieties of the Turkic dialects in East Anatolia, Iraq and Western Iran. In Özsoy, S. ed. 2003. Studies in Linguistics, Turkish. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference in Turkish Linguistics. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press. 321–335.Google Scholar

Bulut, Chr. 2005. Iranian influence in Sonqor Turkic. In Csató, É. Á. et al. eds. 2005: 241–269.Google Scholar

Bulut, Chr. 2006. Syntactic traces of Turkic-Iranian contiguity. In Johanson, L. & Bulut, Chr. eds. Turkic-Iranian Contact Areas. Historical and Linguistic Aspects. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 161–204.Google Scholar

Bulut, Chr. 2007. Iraqi Turkman. In Postgate, N. ed. Languages of Iraq, Ancient and Modern. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 159–187.Google Scholar

Chr, Bulut. ed. 2018. Linguistic Minorities in Turkey and Turkic-speaking Minorities of the Periphery (Turcologica 111). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Čadamba, Z. B. 1974. Todžinskij dialekt tuvinskogo jazyka [The Toju Dialect of Tuvan]. Kyzyl: Tuvknigoizdat.Google Scholar

Čadamba, Z. B. 1983. Tuvinskie dialekty v ix otnošenii k literaturnomu jazyku [Tuvan dialects in their relation to the literary language]. In Sermavkina, V. ed. Voprosy tuvinskoj filologii. Kyzyl: Tuvinskij Naučno-Islsedovatel’skij Institut Jazyka, Literatury i Istorii. 18–23.Google Scholar

Caferoğlu, A. 1959. Die anatolischen und rumelischen Dialekte [The Anatolian and Rumelian Dialects]. In Deny, J. et al. eds. 1959: 239–260.Google Scholar

Caferoğlu, A. & Doerfer, G. 1959. Das Aserbaidschanische [Azeri]. In Deny et al. eds. 1959: 280–307.Google Scholar

Çağatay, S. 1969. Tuba ağzında iyik [Iyik in the Tuba Dialect]. Türkiyat Mecmuası 15: 171–174.Google Scholar

Campbell, L. 2011. Review of James Kari and Ben A. Potter eds. 2010. The Dene–Yeniseian Connection. A Special Joint Publication of the University of Alaska, Fairbanks. Fairbanks: Department of Anthropology and Alaska Native Language Center. International Journal of American Linguistics 77: 445–451.Google Scholar

Clark, L. 1996. The Early Turkic and Sarig Yugur counting systems. In Emmerick, R. et al. eds. Turfan, Khotan und Dunhuang. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. 17–49.Google Scholar

Clark, L. 1998. Turkmen Reference Grammar (Turcologica 34). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Clauson, G. Sir 1956. The case against the Altaic theory. Central Asiatic Journal 2: 181–187.Google Scholar

Clauson, G. Sir 1957. The Turkish Y and related sounds. In Studia Altaica. Festschrift für Nikolaus Poppe zum 60. Geburtstag am 8. August 1957. (Ural-Altaische Bibliothek 5). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 33–45.Google Scholar

Clauson, G. Sir 1960 Sanglax. A Persian Guide to the Turkish Language (Gibb’s Memorial Series N.S. 20). London: Gibb.Google Scholar

Clauson, G. Sir 1962. Turkish and Mongolian Studies (Prize Publication Fund 20). London: Royal Asiatic Society.Google Scholar

Clauson, G. Sir 1966. Three notes on Early Turkish. Türk Dili Araştırmaları Yıllığı Belleten. 1–18.Google Scholar

Clauson, G. Sir 1972. An Etymological Dictionary of Pre-Thirteenth Century Turkish. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Clement, V. 1999. The Politics of Script Reform in Soviet Turkmenistan. Alphabet and National Identity Formation. M.A. Thesis. Ohio State University.Google Scholar

Collinder, B. 1939. Reichstürkische Lautstudien [Turkish Phonetic Studies] (Uppsala Universitets Årsskrift 1939: 1). Uppsala & Leipzig: Lundequistska Bokhandeln & Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Comrie, B. 1976. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Comrie, B. 1981. The Languages of the Soviet Union (Cambridge Language Surveys). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Comrie, B. 1995. Review of Johanson, Lars: Strukturelle Faktoren in türkischen Sprachkontakten [Structural Factors in Turkic Language Contacts] (Stuttgart, 1992). Rivista di Linguistica 7: 391–394. [Reprinted in Johanson, L. 2002. Structural Factors in Turkic Language Contacts, Curzon: Richmond, Surrey. vii–xii.]Google Scholar

Comrie, B. 1996. Script reform in and after the Soviet Union. In Daniels & Bright eds. 1996: 781–784.Google Scholar

Comrie, B. 1997. Some problems in the theory and typology of numeral systems. In Palek, B. ed. Proceedings of LP ‘96. Typology. Prototypes, Item Orderings and Universals, Prague, August 20–22,1996 (Acta Universitatis Carolinae). Prague: Charles University Press. 41–56.Google Scholar

Comrie, B. 2002. Introduction. In Johanson, L. Structural Factors in Turkic Language Contacts. Curzon. vii-xii.Google Scholar

Comrie, B. 2018. Possessive chains and Possessor Camouflage. In Johanson, L. & Mazzielli, L. Fr. & Nevskaya, I. eds. Possession in the Languages of Europe and North and Central Asia (Studies in Language Companion Series 206). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 51–84.Google Scholar

Csató, É. Á. 1985. A syntactic analysis of participle constructions in Modern Turkish. In Beşinci Milletler Arası Türkoloji Kongresi, 23–28 Eylül 1985. Tebliğler 1: Türk Dili. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi. 39–56.Google Scholar

Csató, É. Á. 1990. Referential properties of some Turkish determiners. In Koç, Sabri (ed.) Studies on Turkish Linguistics. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, 17–19 August 1988. Ankara: Middle East Technical University. 117–146.Google Scholar

Csató, É. Á. 1995. Towards a typological classification of Turkish pro-forms. Orientalia Suecana 43–44: 83–92.Google Scholar

Csató, É. Á. 2000. A syntactic asymmetry in Turkish. In Göksel, A. & Kerslake, C. eds. 2000. Studies on Turkish and Turkic Languages (Turcologica 46). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 417–422.Google Scholar

Csató, É. Á. 2001a. Present in Kashkay. Turkic Languages 5: 104–119.Google Scholar

Csató, É. Á. 2001b. Syntactic code-copying in Karaim. In Dahl, Ö. & Koptjevskaja, -Tamm, M. eds. The Circum-Baltic Languages: Their Typology and Contacts (Studies in Language Companion Series 54). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 265–277.Google Scholar

Csató, É. Á. 2001c. Karaim. In Th, Stolz. ed. Minor Languages of Europe (Bochum-Essener Beiträge zur Sprachwandelforschung 30). Bochum: Brockmeyer. 1–24.Google Scholar

Csató, É. Á. 2003. A typology of Turkish double-verb constructions. In Özsoy, S. ed. Studies in Turkish Linguistics. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press. 105–110.Google Scholar

Csató, É. Á. 2005. On copying in Kashkay. In Csató, É. Á. & Isaksson, B. & Jahani, C. eds. Linguistic Convergence and Areal Diffusion. Case Studies from Iranian, Semitic and Turkic. London: RoutledgeCurzon. 271–283.Google Scholar

Csató, É. Á. 2006a. Copying word order properties. In Boeschoten, H. & Johanson, L. eds. 2006. Turkic Languages in Contact (Turcologica 61). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 152–157.Google Scholar

Csató, É. Á. 2006b. Gunnar Jarring’s Kashkay materials. In Johanson, L. & Bulut, Chr. eds. Turkic-Iranian Contact Areas. Historical and Linguistic Aspects (Turcologica 62). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 209–225.Google Scholar

Csató, É. Á. 2010. Two types of complement clauses in Turkish. Boeschoten, In, H. & Rentzsch, J. eds. Turcology in Mainz, Turkologie in Mainz (Turcologica 82). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 107–122.Google Scholar

Csató, É. Á. 2019. On Turkish non-canonical possessives. In Johanson, L. & Mazzitelli, L. Fr. & Nevskaya, I. eds. 2019: 85–102.Google Scholar

Csató, É. Á. & Abish, A. 2015. Relators of comparison in Karaim and in Kazakh as spoken in China. Turkic Languages 19, 40–52.Google Scholar

Csató, É. Á. & Johanson, L. eds. 1993. On gerundial syntax in Turkic. Acta Orientalia Hungarica 46,2–3: 133–141.Google Scholar

Csató, É. Á. & Johanson, L. 1998. Turkish. In Johanson & Csató eds. 1998: 203–235.Google Scholar

Csató, É. Á. & Johanson, L. 2020. The Northwestern Turkic (Kipchak) languages. In Robbeets, M. & Savelyeyv, A. & Hübler, N. eds. The Oxford Guide to the Transeurasian Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 370–391.Google Scholar

Csató, É. Á. & Johanson, L. & Karakoç, B. eds. 2019. Ambiguous Verb Sequences in Transeurasian Languages and Beyond (Turcologica 120). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Csató, É. Á. & Isaksson, B. & Jahani, C. eds. 2005. Linguistic Convergence and Areal Diffusion. Case Studies from Iranian, Semitic and Turkic. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar

Csató, É. & Uchturpani, M. A. 2010. On Uyghur relative clauses. Turkic Languages 14, 69–93.Google Scholar

Damourette, J. & Pichon, É. 1911–1936. Des mots à la pensée. Essai de grammaire de la langue française [From Letters to Thought. Essay to a Grammar of French]. Paris: D’Artrey.Google Scholar

Daniels, P. T. & Bright, W. 1996. The World’s Writing Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Danka, B. 2019. The ‘Pagan’ Oɣuz-nāmä. A Philological and Linguistic Analysis (Turcologica 113). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Dankoff, R. 1983. Wisdom of Royal Glory: A Turco-Islamic Mirror for Princes. (Publications of the Center for Middle Eastern Studies 16). Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dankoff, R. 1995. Armenian Loanwords in Turkish (Turcologica 21). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Dankoff, R. & Kelly, J. 1982–1985. Maḥmūd al-Kāšġarī. Compendium of the Turkic Dialects (Dīwān Lugāt at-Turk) 1–3. Edited and translated with introduction and indices by R. Dankoff in collaboration with Kelly, J. (Sources of Languages, Oriental and Literatures 7). Harvard University Printing Office.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. M. 1916. Modern Greek in Asia Minor. A Study of the Dialects of Sílli, Cappadocia and Phárasa, with Grammar, Texts, Translations and Glossary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Demir, N. 1992. Zur Verwendung der Hilfsverbverbindung -ip dur- in einem anatolischen Dialekt [The use of the auxiliary composition -ip dur- in an Anatolian dialect]. In Bethlenfalvy, et al. eds. Altaic Religious Beliefs and Practices. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University. 89–95.Google Scholar

Demir, N. 1993. Postverbien im Türkeitürkischen [Postverbials in Turkish] (Turcologica 17). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Demir, N. 1997. Die Vergangenheitsform auf -(y)ik in anatolischen Dialekten [The past tense form in -(y)ik in Anatolian dialects]. In Berta, Á. ed. Historical and Linguistic Interaction between Inner-Asia and Europe. Proceeding of the 39th Permanent International Altaistic Conference (PIAC) Szeged. June 16–21,1996 (Studia uralo-altaica 39). Szeged: University of Szeged. 65–79.Google Scholar

Deny, J. 1921. Grammaire de la langue turque (dialecte osmanli) [Grammar of the Turkish Language (Ottoman Dialect)] (Bibliothèque de l’École des Langues Orientales Vivantes 5). Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar

Deny, J. & Grønbech, K. & Scheel, H. & Togan, Z. V. eds. 1959. Philologiae Turcicae Fundamenta 1. Aquis Mattiacis: Steiner.Google Scholar

Dešeriev, J. D. 1958. Razvitie mladopis’mennyx jazykov narodov SSSR [Evolution of the Young Written Languages of the Peoples of the SSSR]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar

Dešeriev, J. D. ed. 1959. Mladopis’mennye jazyki narodov SSSR [Young Written Languages of the Peoples of the SSSR]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1977. Where have all the adjectives gone? Studies in Language 1, 19–80. [Revised version published as pp. 1–62 of Dixon 1982.]Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1982. Where Have All the Adjectives Gone? and Other Essays in Semantics and Syntax. Berlin: Mouton Publishers.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2003. A program for linguistics. Turkic Languages 7: 157–180.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2004. Adjective Classes in Typological Perspective. In Dixon, R. M. W. & Aikhenvald, A. eds. 2004. Adjective Classes: A Cross-Linguistic Typology (Explanations in Linguistic Typology). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1–49.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2010–2012. Basic Linguistic Theory 1–3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dmitriev, N. K. 1940. Grammatika kumykskogo jazyka [Grammar of Kumyk]. Moscow & Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR.Google Scholar

Dmitriev, N. K. 1955. Grammatičeskaja terminologija v učebnikax jazyka: tatarskix, baškirskix i čuvašskix [Grammatical Terminology in Textbooks of Tatar, Bashkir, and Chuvash]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar

Dmitriev, N. K. & Baskakov, N. A. eds. 1955–1962. Issledovanija po sravnitel’noj grammatike tjurkskix jazykov 1–4 [Studies on the Comparative Grammar of the Turkic Languages 1–4]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1963–1975. Türkische und mongolische Elemente im Neupersischen. Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung älterer neupersischer Geschichtsquellen, vor allem der Mongolen- und Timuridenzeit 1–4 [Turkic and Mongolic Elements in New Persian, Focused on Older New Persian Historical Sources of the Mongolic and Timurid Time 1–4] (Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur Mainz. Veröffentlichungen der Orientalischen Kommission 16: 19–21). Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1963. Bemerkungen zur Verwandtschaft der sog. altaischen Sprachen, [Remarks on the relationship of the so-called Altaic languages]. In Doerfer, G. 1963–1975, 1: 51–105.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1967a. Türkisch -n > tschuwaschisch -m? [Turkic -n > Chuvash -m?]. Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher 39: 53–70.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1967b. Türkische Lehnwörter im Tadschikischen [Turkic Loans in Tajik] (Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 37: 3). Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1968a. Das Chaladsch – eine archaische Türksprache in Zentralpersien [Khalaj, an archaic Turkic language in Central Persia]. Zeitschrift der Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 118: 79–112.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1968b. Zwei wichtige Probleme der Altaistik [Two important problems in Altaistics]. Journal de la Société Finno-ougrienne 69: 3–21.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1969. Die Turksprachen Irans [The Turkic Languages of Iran]. Türk Dili Araştırmaları Yıllığı Belleten 302: 13–23.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1970. Irano-Altaistica. In Sebeok, Th. A. ed. Current Trends in Linguistics 6. The Hague & Paris: deGruyter Mouton. 217–234.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1971a. Khalaj Materials. With the collaboration of Wolfram Hesche, Hartwig Scheinhardt, Semih Tezcan (Indiana University Publications. Uralic and Altaic Series 115). Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1971b. Gedanken zur Gestaltung eines idealen türkischen etymologischen Wörterbuchs [Thoughts on the creation of an ideal Turkic etymological thesaurus]. Orientalistische Literaturzeitung 66: 437–454.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1971c. Bemerkungen zur Methodik der türkischen Lautlehre [Notes on the Methodology of the Turkic Sound Structure]. Orientalische Literaturzeitung 66: 325–344.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1973a. Bemerkungen zu den sojonischen Anlautklusilen [Notes on the Soyon initial stops]. Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher 45: 254–260.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1973b. Lautgesetz und Zufall. Betrachtungen zum Omnicomparativismus [Sound Law and Chance. Notes on Omnicomparativism] (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 10). Innsbruck: Universität.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1973c. Tschuwaschisch -m < urtürkisch *-m (> gemeintürkisch -n) [Chuvash -m < Proto-Turkic *-m (> Common Turkic -n)]. Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher 45: 174–212.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1975–1976. Proto-Turkic: Reconstruction problems. Türk Dili Araştırmaları Yıllığı Belleten 433: 1–59.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1976. Das Vorosmanische. (Die Entwicklung der Oghusischen Sprachen von den Orchoninschriften bis zu Sultan Veled) [Pre-Ottoman. The development the Oghuz languages of the Orkhon inscriptions to Sultan Veled] (Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları 433). Türk Dili Araştırmaları Yıllığı Belleten 1975–1976: 81–131.Google Scholar

Doerfer, 1977a. Das Sonqor-Türkische (ein vorläufiger Bericht) [Songor Turkic (a preliminary report)] Studia Orientalia 47: 43–55.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1977b. Zu türkisch: bana ‘mir’, sana ‘dir’ [On Turkish bana ‘to me’ and sana ‘to you’]. Central Asiatic Journal 21: 208–214.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1981. Turkish and Mongolian investigations in Iran and Afghanistan, undertaken by the University of Göttingen. The Bulletin of the International Institute for Linguistic Sciences (Kyoto, Sangyo University) 2, 1: 54–71.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1981–1982. Materialien zu türkisch h- [Materials to Turkic h-] Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher N.S. 1 (1981): 93–141; 2 (1982): 138–168.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1982. Nomenverba im Türkischen [Noun-verbs in Turkic]. Studia Turcologica Memoriae Alexii Bombaci Dicata. Napoli: Istituto Universitario Orientale Seminario di Studi Asiaticii. 101–114.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1983. Ein türkischer Dialekt aus der Gegend von Hamadān [A Turkic dialect from the area of Hamadān] Acta Orientalia Hungarica 36: 99–124.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1984. Neues zum Imperativ des Chaladsch [New notes on the Khalaj imperative]. Journal of Turkish Studies 6: 63–82.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1985a. The Mongol-Tungus connections. Language Research 21: 135–144.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1985b. Kabulafscharisch und Chaladsch [Kabul Afshar and Khalaj]. Central Asiatic Journal 29: 166–175.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1985c. Zum Vokalismus nichterster Silben in altosmanischen Originaltexten (Veröffentlichungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur 37). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1987b. Lexik und Sprachgeographie des Chaladsch 1–2 [Lexicon and linguistic geography of Khalaj 1–2]. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1988. Grammatik des Chaladsch [Khalaj Grammar] (Turcologica 4). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1990. Die Stellung des Osmanischen im Kreise des Oghusischen und seine Vorgeschichte [The position of Ottoman in the Oghuz branch and its prehistory]. In Hazai ed. 1990: 13–34.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1993. Versuch einer linguistischen Datierung älterer osttürkischer Texte [Essay of a linguistic dating of older East Turkic texts] (Turcologica 14). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1994. Zu inschrifttürkisch ēle- [On ēle- in Turkic inscriptions]. Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher N.S. 13: 108–136.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1995. Türkische Farbbezeichnungen und Pferdezucht [Turkic color designations and horse breed]. Central Asiatic Journal 39: 208–227.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1996. Formen der älteren türkischen Lyrik [Forms of the older Turkic lyrics] (Studia Ural-Altaica 37). Szeged: Universitas Szegediensis de Attila József Nominata.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 1998. The Turkic languages of Iran [Turkic languages of Iran]. In Johanson, L. & Csató, É. Á. eds. The Turkic Languages. London & New York: Routledge. 273–283.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. 2015. Wortschatzbesonderheiten der Türksprachen [Lexical particularities of Turkic]. In Cruse, D. A. von & Hundsnurscher, F. & Job, M. & Lutzeier, P. R. eds. Lexikologie/Lexicology 2. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter. 1034–1039.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. & Hesche, W. 1989. Südogusische Materialien aus Afghanistan und Iran [South Oghuz materials from Afghanistan and Iran]. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. & Hesche, W. & Ravanyar, J. 1990. Oghusica aus Iran [Oghuz particularities from Iran]. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Doerfer, G. & Tezcan, S. 1980. Wörterbuch des Chaladsch. Dialekt von Charrāb [Khalaj Lexicon. The Dialect of Kharrāb]. Budapest: Akadémiai.Google Scholar

Dolatkhah, S. 2012. Elements for a grammar of Kashkay. A Turkic language of Iran. Ph.D. thesis. Paris: École Pratique des Hautes Études.Google Scholar

Dolatkhah, S. 2016. Le qashqay, langue turkique d’Iran [Kashkay, a Turkic language in Iran]. Charleston, SC: CreateSpace.Google Scholar

Dolgopolskij, A. B. & Dybo, A. & Babaev, K. V. 2015–2016. Indoevropejskij slovar’ s nostratičeskimi ėtimologiami 1–3 [The Nostratic Etymologies of the Indoeuropean Lexicon]. Miami Book.Google Scholar

Dor, R. & Naumann, G. M. 1978. Die Kirghisen des afghanischen Pamir [The Kirghiz of the Afghan Pamir]. Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar

Dul’zon, A. P. 1954. Terminy rodstva i svojstva v jazykax Narymskogo kraja i Pričulym’ja [Terms of kinship and property in the languages of the Narym krai and Middle Chulym]. In Učenye zapiski Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo pedagogičeskogo instituta. Tomsk. 59–94.Google Scholar

Dul’zon, A. P. 1959. Tjurki Čulyma i ix otnošenie k xakasam [The Turks of Chulym and their relation to the Khakas]. In Učenye zapiski Xakasskogo naučno-issledovatel’skogo instituta jazyka, literatury i istorii 7. Abakan. 93–102.Google Scholar

Dul’zon, A. P. 1966. Ketskie skazki [Ket Fairy Tales]. Tomsk: Tomsk State University.Google Scholar

Dul’zon, A. P. 1973. Dialekty i govory tjurkov Čulyma [Dialects of the Chulym Turks]. Sovetskaja Tjurkologija 2: 16–29.Google Scholar

Dwyer, A. 1998. The Turkic strata of Salar: An Oghuz in Chaghatay clothes? Turkic Languages 2: 49–83.Google Scholar

Dwyer, A. 2000. Consonantalization and obfuscation. In Göksel, A. & Kerslake, C. eds. Studies on Turkish and Turkic Languages (Turcologica 46). Wiesbaden: Harrassoqwitz. 423–432.Google Scholar

Dwyer, A. M. 2007. Salar. A Study in Inner Asian Language Contact Processes 1. Phonology (Turcologica 37.1). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Dyrenkova, N. P. 1940. Grammatika ojrotskogo jazyka [Grammar of the Oyrot Language]. Moscow & Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR.Google Scholar

Ebata, F. 2010. Sakha (Yakut). In Yamakoshi, Y. ed. Grammatical Sketches from the Field. Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa and Tokyo University of Foreign Studies. 179–212.Google Scholar

Eckmann, J. 1950a. Anadolu Karamanlı ağızlarına ait araştırmalar 1. Phonetica [Studies on the Anatolian Karaman Dialects 1. Phonetics]. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil Tarih Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi 8: 165–200.Google Scholar

Eckmann, J. 1950b. Yunan harfli Karamanlı imlası hakkında [On the script of Karaman with Greek letters]. In Eren, H. & T. Halasi Kun, T. eds. Türk dili ve tarihi hakkında araştırmalar 1: 27–31.Google Scholar

Eckmann, J. 1959a. Das Chwarezmtürkische [Khwarezmian Turkic]. In Deny, J. et al. eds. 1959: 113–137.Google Scholar

Eckmann, J. 1959b. Das Tschaghataische [Chaghatay]. In Deny, J. et al. eds. 1959: 138–160.Google Scholar

Eckmann, J. 1964. Die karamanische Literatur [The Karaman literature]. In Bazin, L. et al. eds. 1964: 819–835.Google Scholar

Egorov, V. G. 1964. Ėtimologičeskij slovar’ čuvašskogo jazyka [Etymological Lexicon of Chuvash]. Čeboksary: Čuvašskoe Knižnoe Izdatel’stvo.Google Scholar

Ehlers, G. 1983. Notabilia zur alttürkischen Oberstufenzählung [Notabilia about the Old Turkic overstep counting system]. Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher N.S. 3: 81–87.Google Scholar

Ercilasun, A. B. et al. eds. 1991. Karșılaștırmalı Türk lehçeleri sözlüğü (Kılavuz kitap) [Comparative Lexicon of the Turkic Varieties] (Kültür Bakanlığı yayınları 1371; Kaynak eserler 54). Ankara: Bașbakanlık Basımevi.Google Scholar

Erdal, M. 1991. Old Turkic Word Formation. A Functional Appoach to the Lexicon 1–2 (Turcologica 7). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Erdal, M. 1993. Die Sprache der wolgabolgarischen Inschriften [The Language of the Volga Bulghar Inscriptions] (Turcologica 13). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Erdal, M. 1997. Review of: Lars Johanson, Strukturelle Faktoren in türkischen Sprachkontakten [Structural factors in Turkic language contacts], Stuttgart, 1992. Mediterranean Language Review 9/10: 227–234.Google Scholar

Erdal, M. 2004. The Grammar of Old Turkic. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Erdal, M. 2007. Group inflexion, morphological ellipsis, affix suspension, clitic sharing. In Fernandez-Vest, J. ed. Combat pour les langues du monde / Fighting for the world’s languages, Hommage à Claude Hagège (Collection Grammaire & Cogenition 4 & 5). Paris: L’Harmattan. 177–190.Google Scholar

Erdal, M. & Nevskaya, I. eds. 2006. Exploring the Eastern Frontiers of Turkic (Turcologica 60). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Erdal, M. & Nevskaya, I. & Menz, A. eds. 2012. Areal, Historical and Typological Aspects of South Suberian Turkic (Turcologica 92). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Erdal, M. & Nevskaya, I. & Nugteren, H. & Rind-Pawlowski, M. eds. 2013. Handbuch des Tschalkantürkischen (Turcologica 97, 1). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Erdödi, J. 1979. Die Fragepartikel mo des Tscheremissischen [The Mari interrogative particle mo]. Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen 43: 213–221.Google Scholar

Erguvanlı, E. E. 1984. The Function of Word Order in Turkish. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Press.Google Scholar

Ersen-Rasch, M. I. 2001. Türkische Grammatik für Anfänger und Fortgeschrittene [Turkic Grammar for Beginners and Advanced]. Ismaning: Hueber.Google Scholar

Ersen-Rasch, M. I. 2009. Baschkirisch. Lehrbuch für Anfänger und Fortgeschrittene [Bashkir. Textbook for Beginners and Advanced]. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Erten, M. 1994. Diyarbakır ağzı. İnceleme, metin, sözlük [The Dialect of Diyarbakır. Study, Text, Lexicon] (Türk Dil Kurumu yayınları 556). Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu.Google Scholar

Esipova, A. 2004. The experience of creation of the electronic corpus of the Shor texts. In İmer, K. & Doğan, G. eds. Current Research in Turkish Linguistics. Gazimaĝusa: Eastern Mediterranean University Press. 175–181.Google Scholar

Faseev, F. S. 1966. Kratkij grammatičeskij spravočnik tatarskogo jazyka [Short grammatical guide to Tatar]. In Tatarsko-russkij slovar’. Moscow: Nauka. 807–863.Google Scholar

Forsyth, J. 1992. A History of the Peoples of Siberia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fortescue, M. 2013. North America: Eskimo‐Aleut linguistic history. In Ness, I. & Bellwood, P. eds. The Encyclopedia of Global Human Migration 1. Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 340–345.Google Scholar

Foy, K. 1903. Azerbajğanische Studien mit einer Charakteristik des Südtürkischen 1 [Azeri Studies with a Description of the Features of South Turkic 1] (Mitteilungen des Seminars für Orientalische Sprachen zu Berlin, Westasiatische Studien 6). Berlin: Reichsdruckerei. 126–193.Google Scholar

Foy, K. 1904. Azerbajğanische Studien mit einer Charakteristik de Südtürkischen 2 [Azeri studies with a characteristic of South Turkic 2] (Mitteilungen des Seminars für Orientalische Sprachen, Westasiatische Studien 7). Berlin: Reichsdruckerei. 197–265.Google Scholar

Friedman, V. A. 1999. The Romani language in the Republic of Macedonia: Status, usage, and sociolinguistic perspectives. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 46: 317–339.Google Scholar

Friedman, V. A. 2003. Turkish in Macedonia and Beyond. Studies in Contact, Typology and Other Phenomena in the Balkans and the Caucasus (Turcologica 52). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Friedman, V. A. 2006. West Rumelian Turkish in Macedonia and adjacent areas. In Boeschoten, H. & Johanson, L. eds. Turkic Languages in Contact (Turcologica 61). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 27–45.Google Scholar

Gabain, A. von 1941. Alttürkische Grammatik mit Bibliographie, Lesestücken und Wörterverzeichnis, auch Neutürkisch [Old Turkic Grammar with Bibliography, Readings, and Glossary also in Modern Turkish] (Porta linguarum orientalium 23). Leipzig: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Gabain, A. von 1945. Özbekische Grammatik [Uzbek Grammar] (Porta Linguarum Orientalium 25). Leipzig, Vienna: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Gabain, A. von 1950. Alttürkische Grammatik mit Bibliographie, Lesestücken und Wörterverzeichnis, auch Neutürkisch [Old Turkic Grammar with Bibliography, Readings, and Glossary also in Modern Turkish]. Leipzig: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Gabain, A. von 1959a. Die Sprache des Codex Cumanicus [The language of Codex Cumanicus]. In Deny, et al. eds. 1959: 46–73.Google Scholar

Gabain, A. von 1959b. Das Alttürkische [Old Turkic]. In Deny, J. et al. eds. 1959: 21–45.Google Scholar

Gabain, A. von 1961. Das uigurische Königreich von Chotscho, 850–1250 [The Uyghur Kingdom of Khocho, 850–1250] (Sitzungsberichte der deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin. Klasse für Sprachen, Literatur und Kunst 1961, 5) Berlin.Google Scholar

Gabain, A. von 1970. Primäre und sekundäre Kasus im Alttürkischen [Primary and secondary cases in Old Turkic]. In Jakobson, R. & Sh, Kawamoto. eds. Studies in General and Oriental Linguistics. Tokyo: TEC Company. 131–137.Google Scholar

Gabain, A. von 1973. Das Leben im uigurischen Königreich von Qočo (850–1250) 1–2 [The Life in the Uyghur Kingdom of Qočo (850–1250) 1–2]. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Gabain, A. von, 1974 ³. Alttürkische Grammatik [Old Turkic Grammar]. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Gabain, A. von & Veenker, W. 1969–1972. Radloff. Index der deutschen Bedeutungen [Radloff. Index of the German Meanings] (Veröffentlichungen der Societas Uralo-Altaica 1–4.) Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Gabelentz, H. C. von der 1832. Élémens de la grammaire mandchoue [Elements of the Manchu Grammar]. Altenbourg: Comptoir de la littérature.Google Scholar

Gabelentz, G. von der 1861. Über das Passivum. Eine sprachvergleichende Abhandlung [On the passive. A comparative treatise]. In Abhandlungen der philologisch-historischen Classe der Königlich sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften 3: 449–546.Google Scholar

Gabelentz, G. von der, 1891/1984. Die Sprachwissenschaft. Ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse [Linguistics. Its Tasks, Methods, and Previous Results]. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Gadžieva, N. Z. 1973. Osnovnye puti razvitija sintaksičeskoj struktury tjurkskix jazykov [Main Developments in the Syntactic Structures of Turkic Languages]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar

Geng, Sh. & Clark, L. 1993. Sarig Yugur materials. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 46: 189–224.Google Scholar

Giljarevskij, R. S. & Grivnin, V. S. 1961. Opredelitel’ jazykov mira po pis’mennostjam [Guide to the World’s Languages According to Scripts]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo vostočnoj literatury.Google Scholar

Givón, T. 1979. On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Godel, R. 1945. Grammaire turque. Genève: Université de Genève.Google Scholar

Göksel, A. & Kerslake, C. 2005. Turkish. A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Göksel, A. & Özsoy, S. 2000. Is there a focus position in Turkish? In Göksel, A. & Kerslake, C. eds. Studies on Turkish and Turkic Languages, Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Turkish Linguistics (Turcologica 46). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 219–228.Google Scholar

Golden, P. B. 1992. An Introduction to the History of the Turkic Peoples (Turcologica 9). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Golden, P. B. 2007. The Khazar sacral Kingship revisited. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientarium Hungaricae 60: 161–194.Google Scholar

Golden, P. B. 2012. Oq and Oğur ~ Oğuz. Turkic Languages 16: 155–199.Google Scholar

Greenberg, J. H. 2000–2002. Indo-European and Its Closest Relatives: The Eurasiatic Language Family 1–2. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Grønbech, K. 1936a. Codex Cumanicus. Cod. Marc. Lat. DXLIX. In Faksimile herausgegeben mit einer Einleitung von … (Monumenta Linguarum Asiæ Maioris 1). Kopenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard.Google Scholar

Grönbech, K. 1936b. Der türkische Sprachbau 1 [The Turkic Linguistic Structure 1]. Kopenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard.Google Scholar

Grønbech, K. 1955. Bemerkungen über das alttürkische Verbum [Notes on the Old Turkic verb]. Zeitschrift der Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 105: 69–70.Google Scholar

Grønbech, K. & Krueger, R. 1955. An Introduction to Classical (Literary) Mongolian: Introduction, Grammar, Reader, Glossary. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Grønbech, V. 1902. Forstudier til tyrkisk lydhistorie [Preliminary Studies to a Turkic Sound Structure]. Kopenhagen: Lehmann og Stages.Google Scholar

Grousset, R. 1965 ⁴. L’Empire des steppes, Attila, Gengis-Khan, Tamerlan [The Empire of the Steppes, Attila, Chinggis, and Timur]. Paris: Éditions Payot.Google Scholar

Grousset, R. 1970. The Empire of the Steppes [The Empire of the Steppes]. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Gürsoy Naskali, E. & Şahin, E. eds. 2008. Kültür tarihimizde gizli diller ve şifreler [Secret Languages and Ciphers in Our Cultural History]. İstanbul: Picus Yayınları.Google Scholar

Hahn, R. F. 1991. Spoken Uyghur. London & Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar

Jiànyè韓建業, Hán 1989 = Yībùlā Kèlìmù依布拉 克力木1989. Tán lìshǐshàng de sālāwén – tǔěrkèwén 談歷史上的撒拉文—土爾克文[On the historical Salar Turkic script], Yǔyán yǔ fānyì 語言與翻譯 3: 1–4.Google Scholar

Hanser, O. 1973–1974. Die Nebensatzgrammatik des Türkischen, untersucht an ausgewählten Beispielen [The subordinate clause of Turkic, studied on the basis of selected examples]. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 65/66: 155–218.Google Scholar

Harrison, K. D. 2000. Topics in the phonology and morphology of Tuvan. Doctoral dissertation. Yale University.Google Scholar

Harrison, K. D. 2003. Language Endangerment Among the Tofa. Cultural Survival Quarterly Fall: 53–55.Google Scholar

Harrison, K. D. & Anderson, G. D. S. 2003. Middle Chulym: Theoretical aspects, recent fieldwork and current state. Turkic Languages 7: 245–256.Google Scholar

Harrison, K. D. & Anderson, G. 2008. Tofa language change and terminal generation speakers. In Harrison, K. D. & Rood, D. & Dwyer, A. eds. Lessons from Documented Endangered Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 243–270.Google Scholar

Hashimoto, M. J. 1986. The Altaicization of Northern Chinese. In McCoy, J. & Light, T. eds. Contributions to Sino-Tibetan Studies (Cornell Linguistic Contributions 5). Leiden: Brill. 76–97.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, M. 1993. A Grammar of Lezgian (Mouton Grammar Library 9). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, M. 1994. The tense system of Lezgian. In Thieroff, R. & Ballweg, J. eds. Tense Systems in European Languages (Linguistische Arbeiten 308). Tübingen: Niemeyer. 267–277.Google Scholar

Hatto, A. T. 1970. Shamanism and Epic Poetry in Northern Asia (School of Oriental and African Studies). London: University of London.Google Scholar

Hatto, A. T. 1977. The Memorial Feast for Kokotoy-Khan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hatto, A. T. 1990. The Manas of Wilhelm Radloff. Re-edited, newly translated and with a commentary by Arthur T. Hatto (Asiatische Forschungen 110). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Hauenschild, I. 1996. Tiermetaphorik in türksprachigen Pflanzennamen [Animal Metaphorics in Turkic Plant Names] (Turcologica 29). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Hauenschild, I. 2012. Farbbezeichnungen im Jakutischen. Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Tierfarbenterminologie [Color Distinctions in Yakut, Based on the Consideration of the Terminology of Animal Colors] (Turcologica 92). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Hauenschild, I. 2016. Türksprachige Gräsernamen. Eine lexikographische Untersuchung nebst Glossar [Turkic Names of Grasses. A Lexicological Study with Glossary] (Turcologica 109). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Hayasi, T. 1997. Separated genitive construction in Modern Turkish. In Matsumura, K. & Hayasi, T. eds. The Dative and Related Phenomena. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo. 227–253.Google Scholar

Hayasi, T. 2007. On the distribution of Eynu, a Modern Uyghur-based secret language spoken in South Xinjiang, China. In Boeschoten, H. & Stein, H. eds. Einheit und Vielfalt in der türkischen Welt. Materialien der 5. Deutschen Turkologenkonferenz, Universität Mainz, 4.-7. Oktober 2002 (Turcologica 69). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 182–192.Google Scholar

Hazai, Gy. 1973. Das Osmanisch-Türkische im XVII. Jahrhundert. Untersuchungen an den Transkriptionstexten von Jakab Nagy de Harsány [Ottoman in the 17th Century. Studies on the Transcriptonal Texts of Jakab Nagy de Harsány (Bibliotheca Orientalis Hungarica 18). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar

Hazai, G. 1978. Kurze Einführung in das Studium der türkischen Sprache [Short Introduction to the Study of Turkish]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó & Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Gy, Hazai. ed. 1990. Handbuch der türkischen Sprachwissenschaft 1 [Handbook of the Turkish Linguistics] (Bibliotheca Orientalis Hungarica 31). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar

Hebert, R. J. & Poppe, N. 1963. Kirghiz Manual (Indiana University Publications: Uralic and Altaic Series, 33). Bloomington: Indiana University. [Reprint 1997 Richmond: Curzon. (Research and Studies in Uralic and Altaic Languages, American Council of Learned Societies 22).]Google Scholar

Heine, B. 2009. Grammaticalization of cases. In Malchukov, A. & Spencer, A. eds. The Oxford Handbook of Case. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 458–469.Google Scholar

Heine, B. & Kuteva, T. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Helimski, E. 1995. Samoyedic loans in Turkic. Check-list of etymologies. In Kellner-Heinkele, B. & Stachowski, M. eds. 1995. Laut- und Wortgeschichte der Türksprachen. Beiträge des Internationalen Symposiums Berlin, 7.-10. Juli 1992 (Turcologica 26). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 75–91.Google Scholar

Helimski, E. 1997. Selkup. In Abondolo, D. ed. The Uralic Languages. London & New York: Routledge. 548–579.Google Scholar

Helimski, see also Xelimskij.Google Scholar

Herkenrath, A. 2011. Wh-Konstruktionen im Türkischen [Wh-Constructions in Turkish] (Turcologica 87). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Heyd, U. 1954. Language Reform in Modern Turkey (Oriental Notes and Studies 5). Jerusalem: Israel Oriental Society.Google Scholar

Himmelmann, N. P. & Schultze-Berndt, E. ed. 2005 Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification. The Typology of Depictives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Höhlig, M. 2007. Kontaktbedingter Sprachwandel in der adygeischen Umgangssprache im Kaukasus und in der Türkei. Vergleichende Analyse des russischen und türkischen Einflusses in mündlichen adygeischen Texten [Contact-based Linguistic Differences in Spoken Adyghe in Caucasus and Turkey. Comparative Analysis of the Russian and Turkish Impact in Oral Adyghe Texts] (Lincom Studies in Caucasian Linguistics 03). Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar

Honti, L. 1997. Numerusprobleme (Ein Erkundungszug durch den Dschungel der uralischen Numeri) [Numeral problems (An Exploration in the Jungle of the Ural Numbers]. Finno-Ugrische Forschung 54: 1–126.Google Scholar

Hopper, P. & Thompson, S. 1984. The discourse basis for lexical categories in Universal Grammar. Language 60: 703–752.Google Scholar

Hovdhaugen, E. 1971. Turkish words in Khotanese texts. A linguistic analysis. Norsk Tidskrift for Sprogvidenskap 24: 163–209.Google Scholar

Humphreys, A. & Mits, K. eds. 2001. The Red Book of the Peoples of the Russian Empire. Tallinn: NGO Red Book.Google Scholar

Ibrahimi, S. 1982. Ndikimi i gjuhës shqipe në rrafshin fonologjik të turqishtes së folur në Maqedoni dhe Kosovë [Influence of the Albanian language on the phonological level of spoken Turkish in Macedonia and Kosovo]. Studime filologjike 36, 2: 51–61.Google Scholar

Igla, B. 1996. Das Romani von Ajia Varvara [The Romani Language of Ajia Varvara]. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Illič-Svityč, V. M. 1971–1984. Opyt sravnenija nostratičeskix jazykov 1–3 [An Experiment in Comparing the Nostratic Languages]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar

Imart, G. 1981. Le Kirghiz (Turk d’Asie Central Sovietique). Description d’une langue de littérisation récente [Kirghiz (Turkic of Central Soviet Asia). Description of a Language with Recent Literacy]. Aix-en-Provence: Publications de l’Université de Provence.Google Scholar

Isanbaev, N. I. 1979. Voprosy istorii i dialektologii. Voprosy marijskogo jazyka [Questions of History and Dialectology. Questions of the Mari language]. Joskar-Ola: Marijskij naučno-issledovatel’skij institut.Google Scholar

Isanbaev, N. I. 1989. Mari-Turkic Language Contacts 1. Tatar and Bashkir Borrowings. Yoshkar-Ola: Mari Book Publishing House.Google Scholar

İslamov, M. İ. et al. eds. 1990. Azärbaycan Dilinin Dialektoloji Atlası [Dialectological Atlas of the Azeri Language]. Baku: Älm.Google Scholar

İșsever, S. 2003. Information structure in Turkish: The word order-prosody interface. Lingua 113: 1025–1053.Google Scholar

Isxakov, F. G. & Pal’mbax, A. A. 1961. Grammatika tuvinskogo jazyka. Fonetika i morfologija [Grammar of Tuvan. Phonetics and Morphology]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo vostočnoj literatury.Google Scholar

Itkonen, E. 1955. Über die Betonungsverhältnisse in den finnisch-ugrischen Sprachen [On the accentuation in Finno-Ugric languages]. Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 1/2: 21–34.Google Scholar

Ivanics, M. & Usmanov, M. A. 2002. Das Buch der Dschingis-Legende: Däftär-i Cingiz-namä [The Book of the Genghis Legend] (Studia uralo-altaica 44). Szeged: Szegedi Tudományegyetem.Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. 1960. Linguistics and poetics. In Sebeok, T. ed. 1960, Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press. 350–377.Google Scholar

Janhunen, J. 1996. Manchuria. An Ethnic History. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.Google Scholar

Janhunen, J. 1998. Samoyedic. In Abondolo, D. ed. The Uralic Languages. New York & London: Routledge. 457–479.Google Scholar

Janhunen, J. 2003. The Mongolic Languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Janhunen, J. 2005. The role of the Turkic languages in the Amdo Sprachbund. In Siemieniec-Golas, E. & Pomorska, M. eds. Turks and Non-Turks. Studies on the History of Linguistic and Cultural Contacts (Studia Turcologica Cracoviensia 10.) Kraków: Institute of Oriental Philology, Jagiellonian University. 113–122.Google Scholar

Janhunen, J. 2007. The changing faces of Amdo Qinghai. Studia Orientalia (Helsinki: Finnish Oriental Society) 101: 501–510.Google Scholar

Jankowski, H. 2003. On the language varieties of Karaims in the Crimea. Studia Orientalia 95: 109–130.Google Scholar

Jankowski, H. 2019. Unmarked accusative and genitive after possessive suffixes in Tuvan. Central Asiatic Journal 62: 13–26.Google Scholar

Jankowski, H. & Aqtay, D. & Cegiołka, D. & Çulha, T. & Németh, M. 2019. The Crimean Karaim Bible 1–2 (Turcologica 119). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Janse, M. 2009. Greek-Turkish language contact in Asia minor. Études helléniques / Hellenic Studies 17: 37–54.Google Scholar

Jarring, G. 1933. Studien zu einer osttürkischen Lautlehre [Studies in Eastern Turkic Phonology]. Lund: Borelius.Google Scholar

Jarring, G. 1939. On the Distribution of Turk Tribes in Afghanistan. An Attempt at a Preliminary Classification. (Lunds Universitets Årsskrift, N.S. 1, 35: 4). Lund, Leipzig: Gleerup & Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Jarring, G. 1941. Zurufe an Tiere bei den Osttürken [Calls to Animals with the Eastern Turks]. In Jaeschke, G. ed. Festschrift Friedrich Giese aus Anlass des siebzigsten Geburtstags. Berlin: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Islamkunde. 46–52.Google Scholar

Jarring, G. 1964. An Eastern Turki-English Dialect Dictionary (Lunds Universitets Årsskrift. N.S. 1: 56:4). Lund: CWK Gleerup.Google Scholar

Jarring, G. 1989. Literary Texts from Kashgar, Edited and Translated with Notes and Glossary. Lund: Kungl. Humanistiska Vetenskapssamfundet.Google Scholar

Jašar-Nasteva, O. 1970. Za makedonskite tajni jazici [On Macedonian secret languages]. Godišen zbornik na Filozofskiot fakultet na Univerzitetot vo Skopje 22: 553–569.Google Scholar

Jastrow, O. 2018. Semitic languages in Southeastern Turkey and Semitic-Iranian-Turkish language contacts. In Bulut ed. 2018: 231–240.Google Scholar

Jespersen, O. 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1971. Aspekt im Türkischen. Vorstudien zu einer Beschreibung des türkeitürkischen Aspektsystems [Aspect in Turkish. Preliminary Studies for a Description of the Turkish Aspect System] (Studia Turcica Upsaliensia 1). Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1973. Sprachbau und Inhaltssyntax am Beispiel des Türkischen [Linguistic structure and semantic syntax on the example of Turkish]. Orientalia Suecana 22: 82–106.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1974a. Zur Syntax der alttürkischen Kausativa [On the syntax of Old Turkic causatives]. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, Supplement 2: 529–540.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1974b. Review of Weiers, Michael: Die Sprache der Moghol der Provinz Herat in Afghanistan. Acta Orientalia 36: 459–472.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1975a. Das tschuwaschische Aoristthema [The Chuvash aorist theme]. Orientalia Suecana 23–24: 106–158.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1975b. Some remarks on Turkic ‘hypotaxis’. Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher 47: 104–118. [Reprinted in Décsy, Gy. & Dimov-Bogoev, Chr. D. eds. 1977. Eurasia Nostratica 1–2 (Festschrift für Karl Heinrich Menges). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.]Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1976a. Zum Präsens der nordwestlichen und mittelasiatischen Türksprachen [On the present tense in Northwestern and Central Asiatic Turkic languages]. Acta Orientalia 37: 57–74.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1976b. Review of Nash, Rose: Turkish intonation. An instrumental study. Orientalistische Literaturzeitung 71: 279–280.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1977a. Die Ersetzung der türkischen -t-Kausativa [The replacement of the Turkic -t-causatives]. Orientalia Suecana 25–26 (1976–1977): 106–133.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1977b. Bestimmtheit und Mitteilungsperspektive im türkischen Satz [Definiteness and information structure in the Turkic sentence]. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, Supplement 3, 2: 1186–1203.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1979a. Alttürkisch als ‘dissimilierende Sprache’ [Old Turkic as ‘Dissimilating Language’] (Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Mainz, Geistes- und sozialwissenschaftliche Klasse 1979: 3). Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1979b. Die westoghusische Labialharmonie [The West Oghuz labial harmony]. Orientalia Suecana 27–28: 63–107.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1981. Pluralsuffixformen im Südwesttürkischen [Plural Suffix Forms in Southwestern Turkic] (Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Mainz, Geistes- und sozialwissenschaftliche Klasse, 1981: 9). Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1984. Review of Sanjian, Avedis K. & Tietze, Andreas: Eremya Chelebi Kömürjian’s Armeno-Turkish poem ‘The Jewish bride’. Orientalistische Literaturzeitung 79: 278–281.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1986a. Zur Konsonantenstärke im Türkischen [On consonant strength in Turkic]. Orientalia Suecana 33–35:195–209.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1986b. Reproduktion, Widerstand und Anpassung: Zur lautlichen Iranisierung im Türkischen [Reproduction, Resistance, and Adjustment]. In Schmitt, R. & Skjærvø, P. O. eds. Studia grammatica Iranica. Festschrift für Helmut Humbach. München: Kitzinger. 185–201.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1988a. Iranian elements in Azeri Turkish. In Yarshater, E. ed. Encyclopædia Iranica 3. London & New York. 248b–251a.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1988b. Grenzen der Turcia. Verbindendes und Trennendes in der Entwicklung der Türkvölker [The borders of Turcia: Connections and divisions in the development of the Turkic peoples]. In Ehrensvärd, U. ed. Turcica et Orientalia. Studies in Honour of Gunnar Jarring on His Eightieth Birthday 12th October 1987. Stockholm: Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul. 51–61.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1988c. On the renewal and reinterpretation of ‘instrumental’ gerunds in Turkic. Oriens 31: 136–153.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1989a. Substandard und Sprachwandel im Türkischen [Substandard and linguistic change in Turkic]. Holtus, In, G. & Radtke, E. eds. Sprachlicher Substandard 2. Standard und Substandard in der Sprachgeschichte und in der Grammatik (Konzepte der Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft 44). Tübingen: Niemeyer. 83–112.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1989b. Aorist and present tense in West Oghuz Turkic. Journal of Turkish Studies 13: 99–105.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1990a. Zu den Grundfragen einer kritischen Altaistik [On the basic issues of a critical Altaistic]. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 80: 103–124.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1990b. Studien zur türkeitürkischen Grammatik [Studies on Turkish grammar]. In Gy, Hazai. ed. Handbuch der türkischen Sprachwissenschaft 1. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. 146–278.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1991a. On syllabic frontness oppositions in Turkic. Varia Eurasiatica. Festschrift für Professor András Róna-Tas. Szeged: Department of Altaic Studies. 77–94.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1991b. Zur Typologie türkischer Gerundialsegmente [On the typology of Turkic converb segments]. Türk Dilleri Araṣtırmaları 1: 98–110.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1991c. Subjektlose Sätze im Türkischen [Subjectless clauses in Turkic]. In Brendemoen, B. ed. Altaica, Osloensia. Proceedings from the 32nd Meeting of the Permanent International Altaistic Conference. Oslo, June 12–16, 1989. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. 193–218.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1992a. Zur Isochronie im Türkischen [On isochrony in Turkic]. In Bethlenfalvy, G. et al. eds. Altaic Religious Beliefs and Practices. Budapest: Research Group for Altaic Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences. 183–188.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1992b. Strukturelle Faktoren in türkischen Sprachkontakten [Structural Factors in Turkic Linguistic Contacts] (Sitzungsberichte der Wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft an der J. W. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, 29:5). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1992c. Zur Geltung türkischer Schriftsprachen und Schriftsysteme [On the validity of Turkic written languages and script systems]. Türk Kültürü Araştırmaları 30: 165–178.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1993a. Rūmī and the birth of Turkish poetry. Journal of Turkology 1: 23–37.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1993b. Code-copying in immigrant Turkish. In Extra, G. & Verhoeven, L. eds. Immigrant Languages in Europe. Clevedon & Philadelphia & Adelaide: Multilingual Matters Ltd. 197–221.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1993c. Review of Sims-Williams, Nicholas & Hamilton, James: Documents turco-sogdiens du IXe-Xe siècle de Touen-huang. Acta Orientalia 54: 197–199.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1993d. Typen türkischer Kausalsatzverbindungen [Types of Turkic causal-clause linking]. Journal of Turkology (Szeged) 1: 213–267.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1994a. Türkeitürkische Aspektotempora [Turkish aspect tenses]. In Thieroff, Rolf & Ballweg, Joachim (eds.) Tense Systems in European Languages. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 247–266.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1994b. Ein türkisches Erzählsatzmuster [A Turkic pattern of narrative clauses]. In Bellmann, D. ed. Gedenkschrift Wolfgang Reuschel. Stuttgart: Steiner. 165–174.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1994c. Formal aspects of ʿaruḍ versification. In Johanson, L. & Utas, B. eds. Arabic Prosody and Its Applications in Muslim Poetry (Transactions 5). Stockholm: Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul. 7–16.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1994d. Funktion, Kompetenz und Etymon. Bemerkungen zu einer ost-alttürkischen Wortbildungslehre. Central Asiatic Journal 38: 160–178.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1995a. On Turkic converb clauses. In Haspelmath, M. & König, E. eds. Converbs in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Structure and Meaning of Adverbial Verb Forms – Adverbial Participles, Gerunds (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 13). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 313–347.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1995b. Mehrdeutigkeit in der türkischen Verbalkomposition [Ambiguity in Turkic verbal compositions]. In Erdal, M. & Tezcan, S. eds. Beläk Bitig. Sprachstudien für Gerhard Doerfer zum 75. Geburtstag (Turcologica 23). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 81–101.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1995c. Wie ensteht ein türkisches Wort? [How does a Turkic word derive?] In Kellner-Heikele, B. & Stachowksi, M. eds. Laut- und Wortgeschichte der Türksprachen (Turcologica 26). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 97–121.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1996a. Kopierte Satzjunktoren im Türkischen [Copied clause juctions in Turkic]. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 49: 39–49.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1996b. On Bulgarian and Turkic indirectives. In Boretzky, N. & Enninger, W. & Th, Stolz. eds. Areale, Kontakte, Dialekte. Sprache und ihre Dynamik in mehrsprachigen Situationen (Bochum-Essener Beiträge zur Sprachwandelforschung 24). Bochum: Brockmeyer. 84–94.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1997a. A grammar of the “lingua turcica agemica”. In Kellner-Heinkele, B. & Zieme, P. eds. Studia Ottomanica. Festgabe für György Hazai zum 65. Geburtstag (Veröffentlichungen der Societas Uralo-Altaica 47). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 87–101.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1997b. Kopien russischer Konjunktionen in türkischen Sprachen [Copies of Russian conjunctions in Turkic]. In Huber, D. & Worbs, E. eds. Ars transferendi. Sprache, Übersetzung, Interkulturalität. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. 115–121.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1998a. The History of Turkic. In Johanson & Csató eds. 1998: 81–125.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1998b. The Structure of Turkic. In Johanson & Csató eds. 1998: 30–66.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1998c. Code-copying in Irano-Turkic. Language Sciences 20: 325–337.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1999a. Frame-changing code-copying in immigrant varieties. In Extra, G. & Verhoeven, L. eds. Bilingualism and Migration (Studies on Language Acquisition 14). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 247–260.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1999b. The dynamics of code-copying in language encounters. In Brendemoen, B. & Lanza, E. & Ryen, E. eds. Language Encounters Across Time and Space. Oslo: Novus Press. 37–62.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1999c. Typological notes on aspect and actionality in Turkic, Kipchak. In Abraham, W. & Kulikov, L. eds. Tense-Aspect, Transitivity and Causativity. Essays in Honour of Vladimir Nedjalkov (Studies in Language Companion series 50). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 171–184.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1999d. Grenzbezogenheit in Aspekt und Lexik am Beispiel türkischer Postverbialkonstruktionen [Border relatedness in aspect and lexicon on the example of Turkic postverbial constructions]. In Breu, W. ed. Probleme der Interaktion von Lexik und Aspekt (ILA). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 129–139.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2000a. Linguistic convergence in the Volga area. In Gilbers, D. & Nerbonne, J. & Schaeken, J. eds. Languages in Contact (Studies in Slavic and General linguistics 28). Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi. 165–178.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2000b. Attractiveness and relatedness: Notes on Turkic language contacts. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, February 12–15, 1999. Good, J. & Yu, A. C. L. eds. Special session on Caucasian, Dravidian, and Turkic linguistics. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 87–94.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2000c. Viewpoint operators in European languages. In Dahl, Ö. ed. Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 27–187.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2000d. Turkic indirectives. In Johanson, L. & Utas, B. eds. Evidentials. Turkic, Iranian and Neighbouring Languages. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 61–87.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2001a. Discoveries on the Turkic Linguistic Map (Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul, Publications 5). Stockholm: Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2001b. On Bulgarian copies of Turkish suffixes. In Igla, B. & Th, Stolz. eds. ‘Was ich noch sagen wollte … ’. A multilingual Festschrift for Norbert Boretzky on occasion of his 65th birthday (Studia Typologica 2). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. 177–180.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2001c. Vom Alttürkischen zu den modernen Türksprachen [From Old Turkic to the modern Turkic languages]. In Haspelmath, M. & König, E. & Oesterreicher, W. & Raible, W. eds. Language Typology and Language Universals 2: 2. Walter de Gruyter: Berlin & New York. 1718–1742.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2002a. Structural Factors in Turkic Language Contacts [With an introduction by Bernard Comrie]. London: Curzon.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2002b. Contact-induced linguistic change in a code-copying framework. In Jones, M. C. & Esch, E. eds. Language Change: The Interplay of Internal, External and Extra-Linguistic Factors (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 86). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 285–313.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2003a. Smaller Turkic languages. In Sherzer, J. & Th, Stolz. eds. Minor Languages: Approaches, Definitions, Controversies (Diversitas Linguarum 3). Bochum: Universitätsverlag Brockmeyer. 15–39.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2003b. Evidentiality in Turkic. In Aikhenvald, A. Y. & Dixon, R. M. W. eds. Studies in Evidentiality (Typological Studies in Language 54). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 273–290.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2004a. On the Turkic origin of Hungarian igen ‘yes’. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 57: 93–104.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2004b. On Turkic transformativizers and nontransformativizers. Turkic Languages 8: 180–190.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2005a. Converging codes in Iranian, Semitic and Turkic. In Csató & Isaksson, & Jahani eds. 2005: 3–31.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2005b. Tuwinische Postverbien und chaladschische Imperative [Tuvan postverbials and Khalaj imperatives]. In Oelschlägel, A. Chr. & Nentwig, I. & Taube, J. eds. ‘Roter Altai, gib Dein Echo!’. Festschrift für Erika Taube zum 65. Geburtstag. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag. 183–186.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2005c. Participles in Caucasus Turkic. In Haug, D. & Welo, E. eds. Haptačahaptāitiš – Festschrift for Fridrik Thordarson (The Institute for Comparative Research in Human Culture, B: 116). Oslo: Novus forlag. 151–156.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2006a. The borders of Turcia: Connections and divisions in the development of the Turkic peoples. In Çağatay, E. & Kuban, D. eds. The Turkic Speaking Peoples. 2000 Years of Art and Culture from Inner Asia to the Balkans. Munich & Berlin & London & New York: Prestel. 19–29.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2006b. On the roles of Turkic in the Caucasus area. In Matras, Y. & McMahon, A. & Vincent, N. eds. Linguistic Areas. Convergence in Historical and Typological Perspective. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. 160–181.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2006c. Adjectives and nouns in South Siberian. In Erdal, M. & Nevskaya, I. eds. Exploring the Eastern Fontiers of Turkic in South Siberia (Turcologica 60). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 57–78.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2007a. Strong and weak codas in Turkic prime morphemes. In Öztopçu, K. ed. Festschrift in honor of András J. E. Bodrogligeti. Türk Dilleri Araştırmaları 17: 191–199.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2009. Modals in Turkic. In Hansen, Bj. & de Haan, F. eds. Modals in the Languages of Europe. A Reference Work (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 44). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 487–510.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2010a. The high and low spirits of Transeurasian language studies. In Johanson & Robbeets eds. 2010: 7–20.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2010b. Three kinds of clause junctors. In Ziegelmeyer, G. & Cyffer, N. eds. Aspects of Co- and Subordination. Case Studies from African, Slavonic, and Turkic Languages. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag. 9–14.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2011a. Why don’t they meet face to face? On hiatus-preventing allomorphy in Turkish and its relatives. In Erguvanlı Taylan, E. & Rona, B. eds. Puzzles of Language. Essays in Honour of Karl Zimmer (Turcologica 86). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 23–36.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2011b. Grammaticalizaton in Turkic languages. In Narrog, H. & Heine, B. eds. The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 752–761.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2011c. Mood meets mood. In Th, Stolz. & Vanhove, M. & Urdze, A. & Otsuka, H. eds. Morphologies in Contact (Studia Typologica 10). Berlin: Akademie Verlag. 203–211.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2012a. Pyramids of spatial relators in Northeastern Turkic and its neighbors. In Suihkonen, P. & Comrie, B. & Solovyev, V. eds. Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. A Crosslinguistic Typology (Studies in Companion, Language 126). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 191–210.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2012b. Notes on Turkic stance particles. In Erdal, M. & Nevskaya, I. & Menz, A. eds. Areal, Historical and Typological Aspects of South Siberian Turkic (Turcologica 94). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 51–58.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2013a. Written language intertwining. In Bakker, P. & Matras, Y. eds. Contact Languages. A Comprehensive Guide. Boston & Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 273–331.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2014a. A synopsis of Turkic volitional moods. Turkic Languages 18: 19–52.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2014b. Review of Aikhenvald A. Y. & Dixon R. M. W. eds. Possession and Ownership: A Cross-linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford Universiry Press. Language 90: 277–280.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2018a. Five dimensions of linguistic distance. Turkic Languages 22: 36–42.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2018b. Turkic indirectivity. In Aikhenvald, A. Y. ed. The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press. 510–524.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 2019a. Review of Aikhenvald, A. Y. & Dixon, R. M. W. eds. Commands. A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Studies in Language 43: 752–756.Google Scholar