Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T18:36:23.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Human Osteology

from Part III - Bioarchaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2019

By
Darlene A. Weston
Edited by
Michael P. Richards  and
Kate Britton
Michael P. Richards
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University, British Columbia
Kate Britton
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
Get access

Summary

The osteological study of human remains from archaeological contexts can provide a wealth of information on past peoples, principally because it involves examining the primary data: the people themselves. Human osteologists use the physical remains of the human body to reconstruct behaviour, demography, growth and development, and health at both the individual and the population level, working from a biocultural perspective (Goodman and Leatherman 1998).

Type
Chapter
Information
Archaeological Science
An Introduction
 , pp. 147 - 169
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acsádi, G. and Nemeskéri, J. 1970. History of Human Life Span and Mortality. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Ahlqvist, J. and Damsten, O. 1969. Modification of Kerley’s method for the microscopic determination of age in human bone. Journal of Forensic Sciences 14:205–212.Google Scholar
Algee-Hewitt, B. F. B. 2013. Age estimation in modern forensic anthropology. In: `Tersigni-Tarrant, M. T. A. and `Shirley, N. R. (eds.) Forensic Anthropology: An Introduction, pp. 181–230. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Aufderheide, A. C. and Rodriguez-Martin, C. 1998. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human Paleopathology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, S. E. 2008. Inter- and intra-specific variation in Pan crown tooth morphology: Implications for Neandertal taxonomy. In: `Irish, J. D. and `Nelson, G. C. (eds.) Technique and Application in Dental Anthropology, pp. 293–316. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bass, W. M. 2005. Human Osteology: A Laboratory and Field Manual, 5th ed. Columbia: Missouri Archaeological Society.Google Scholar
Behrensmeyer, A. K. 1978. Taphonomic and ecological information from bone weathering. Paleobiology 4:150–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, T. K. 1978. Sexual dimorphism in the tooth-crown diameters of deciduous teeth. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 48:77–82.Google Scholar
Bocquet-Appel, J. and Masset, C. 1982. Farewell to paleodemography. Journal of Human Evolution 11:321–333.Google Scholar
Bogin, B. 1998. Social and economic class. In: `Ulijaszek, S. J., `Johnston, F. E., and `Preece, M. A. (eds.) Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human Growth and Development, pp. 399–401. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boldsen, J. L., Milner, G. R., Konigsberg, L. W. and Wood, J. W. 2002. Transition analyses: A new method for estimating age from skeletons. In: `Hoppa, R. D. and `Vaupel, J. W. (eds.) Paleodemography: Age Distributions from Skeletal Samples, pp. 73–106. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boylston, A. 2004. Recording of weapon trauma. In: `Brickley, M. B. and `McKinley, J. I. (eds.) Guidelines to the Standards for Recording Human Remains, pp. 40–42. IFA Paper No. 7. Reading: Institute of Field Archaeologists.Google Scholar
Bräuer, G. 1988. Osteometrie. In: `Knussmann, R. (ed.) Anthropologie: Handbuch der Vergleichenden Biologie des Menschen, pp. 160–232. Stuttgart: Fischer.Google Scholar
Brickley, M. and Ives, R. 2008. The Bioarchaeology of Metabolic Bone Disease. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Brothwell, D. R. 1981. Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment, and Study of Human Skeletal Remains. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Brothwell, D. and Zakrzewski, S. 2004. Metric and non-metric studies of archaeological human bone. In: `Brickley, M. B. and `McKinley, J. I. (eds.) Guidelines to the Standards for Recording Human Remains, pp. 14–17. IFA Paper No. 7. Reading: Institute of Field Archaeologists.Google Scholar
Buckberry, J. L. and Chamberlain, A. T. 2002. Age estimation from the auricular surface of the ilium: A revised method. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 119:231–239.Google Scholar
Buikstra, J. E. and Ubelaker, D. H. 1994. Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains. Fayetteville: Arkansas Archaeological Survey.Google Scholar
Burns, K. R. and Maples, W. R. 1976. Estimation of age from individual adult teeth. Journal of Forensic Sciences 21:343–356.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, A. T. 2000. Problems and prospects in palaeodemography. In: `Cox, M. and `Mays, S. (eds.) Human Osteology in Archaeology and Forensic Science, pp. 101–115. London: Greenwich Medical Media.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, A. T. 2006. Demography in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DeVito, C. and Saunders, S. R. 1990. A discriminant function analysis of deciduous teeth to determine sex. Journal of Forensic Sciences 35:845–858.Google Scholar
Duday, H. 2009. The Archaeology of the Dead: Lectures in Archaeothanatology. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Eveleth, P. B. and Tanner, J. M. 1990. Worldwide Variation in Human Growth, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Falys, C. G., Schutkowski, H. and Weston, D. A. 2005. The distal humerus – a blind test of Rogers’ sexing technique using a documented skeletal collection. Journal of Forensic Sciences 50:1–5.Google Scholar
Falys, C. G., Schutkowski, H. and Weston, D. A. 2006. Auricular surface ageing – worse than expected? Results from a blind test using a documented skeletal collection. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 130:508–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazekas, I. G. and Kosa, F. 1978. Forensic Fetal Osteology. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Fully, G. 1956. Une nouvelle méthode de détermination de la taille. Annales de Médecine Légale 36:266–273.Google Scholar
Giles, E. and Elliot, O. 1963. Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of crania. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 21:53–68.Google Scholar
`Goodman, A. H. and `Leatherman, T. L. (eds.) 1998. Building a New Biocultural Synthesis: Political-Economic Perspectives on Human Biology. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grauer, A. L. 2007. Macroscopic analysis and data collection in palaeopathology. In: `Pinhasi, R. and `Mays, S. (eds.) Advances in Human Palaeopathology, pp. 57–76. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Gustafson, G. 1950. Age determination on teeth. Journal of the American Dental Association 41:45–54.Google Scholar
Hackett, C. J. 1976. Diagnostic Criteria of Syphilis, Yaws and Treponarid (Treponematoses) and of Some Other Diseases in Dry Bones (for Use in Osteo-Archaeology). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Hillier, M. L. and Bell, L. S. 2007. Differentiating human bone from animal bone: A review of histological methods. Journal of Forensic Sciences 52:249–263.Google Scholar
Hillson, S. 1996. Dental Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holliday, T. W. and Hilton, C. E. 2010. Body proportions of circumpolar peoples as evidenced from skeletal data: Ipiutak and Tigara (Point Hope) versus Kodiak Island Inuit. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 142:287–302.Google Scholar
Howells, W. W. 1973. Cranial Variation in Man: A Study by Multivariate Analysis of Patterns of Difference among Recent Human Populations. Papers of the Peabody Museum 67. Cambridge, Mass: Peabody Museum, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Howells, W. W. 1989. Skull Shapes and the Map: Craniometric Analyses in the Dispersion of Modern Homo. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 79. Cambridge, Mass: Peabody Museum, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Iordanidis, P. 1961. Détermination du sexe par les os du squelette (atlas, axis, clavicule, omoplate, sternum). Annales de Médecine Légale 41:280–291.Google Scholar
Işcan, M. and Loth, S. 1986a. Determination of age from the sternal rib in white males: A test of the phase method. Journal of Forensic Science 31:122–132.Google Scholar
Işcan, M. and Loth, S. 1986b. Determination of age from the sternal rib in white females: A test of the phase method. Journal of Forensic Science 31:990–999.Google Scholar
Jackes, M., Silva, A. M. and Irish, J. 2001. Dental morphology: A valuable contribution to our understanding of prehistory. Journal of Iberian Archaeology 3:97–119.Google Scholar
Jit, I. and Singh, S. 1966. The sexing of adult clavicles. Indian Journal of Medical Research 54:551–571.Google Scholar
Johanson, G. 1971. Age determination from human teeth. Odontologisk Revy 22:1–126.Google Scholar
Katz, D. and Suchey, J. M. 1986. Age determination of the male os pubis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 69:427–435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerley, E. R. 1965. The microscopic determination of age in human bone. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 23:149–164.Google Scholar
Kerley, E. R. and Ubelaker, D. H. 1978. Revisions in the microscopic method of estimating age at death in human cortical bone. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 49:545–546.Google Scholar
Larsen, C. S. 1997. Bioarchaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, C. O., Meindl, R. S., Mensforth, R. P. and Barton, T. J. 1985a. Multifactorial determination of skeletal age at death: A method and blind test of its accuracy. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 68:1–14.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, C. O., Meindl, R. S., Pryzbeck, T. R. and Mensforth, R. P. 1985b. Chronological metamorphosis of the auricular surface of the ilium: A new method for the determination of age at death. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 68:15–28.Google Scholar
Lovell, N. 1997. Trauma analysis in paleopathology. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 40:139–170.3.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovell, N. 2000. Paleopathological description and diagnosis. In: `Katzenberg, M. A. and `Saunders, S. R. (eds.) Biological Anthropology of the Human Skeleton, pp. 217–248. New York: Wiley Liss.Google Scholar
Maat, G. J., Maes, A., Aarents, M. J. and Nagelkerke, N. J. 2006. Histological age prediction from the femur in a contemporary Dutch sample: The decrease of nonremodeled bone in the anterior cortex. Journal of Forensic Sciences 51(2):230–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maresh, M. M. 1970. Measurements from roentgenograms. In: `McCammon, R. W. (ed.) Human Growth and Development, pp. 157–199. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Martin, R. and Saller, K. 1957. Lehrbuch der Anthropologie. Stuttgart: Fischer.Google Scholar
Mays, S. A. 1999. Linear and appositional long bone growth in earlier human populations: A case study from Mediaeval England. In: `Hoppa, R. D. and `FitzGerald, C. M. (eds.) Human Growth in the Past: Studies from Bones and Teeth, pp. 290–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mays, S. and Cox, M. 2000. Sex determination in skeletal remains. In: `Cox, M. and `Mays, S. (eds.) Human Osteology in Archaeology and Forensic Science, pp. 117–130. London: Greenwich Medical Media.Google Scholar
McKern, T. W. and Stewart, T. D. 1957. Skeletal age changes in young American males, analysed from the standpoint of age identification. Headquarters Quartermaster Research and Development Command, Technical Report EP-45. Natick, MA.Google Scholar
McKinley, J. I. 2004. Compiling a skeletal inventory: Disarticulated and co-mingled remains. In: `Brickley, M. B. and `McKinley, J. I. (eds.) Guidelines to the Standards for Recording Human Remains, pp. 14–17. IFA Paper No. 7. Reading: Institute of Field Archaeologists.Google Scholar
Meindl, R. S. and Lovejoy, C. O. 1985. Ectocranial suture closure: A revised method for the determination of skeletal age at death based on the lateral-anterior sutures. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 68:57–66.Google Scholar
Merchant, V. L and Ubelaker, D. H. 1977. Skeletal growth of the protohistoric Arikara. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 46:61–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, A. E. W. 1963. The dentition in the assessment of individual age in skeletal material. In: `Brothwell, D. R. (ed) Dental Anthropology, pp. 191–209. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Molleson, T. and Cox, M. 1993. The Spitalfields Project. Volume 2: The Anthropology. CBA Research Report 86.Google Scholar
Moore, H. 1994. A Passion for Difference: Essays in Anthropology and Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Ogden, A. 2008. Advances in the palaeopathology of teeth and jaws. In: `Pinhasi, R. and `Mays, S. (eds.) Advances in Human Palaeopathology, pp. 283–308. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Ortner, D. J. 2003. Identification of Pathological Conditions in Human Skeletal Remains, 2nd ed. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pearson, K. and Bell, J. 1917/1919. A study of the long bones of the English skeleton. I. the femur. Drapers’ Company Research Memoirs. Biometric Series X. Department of Applied Mathematics, University College, University of London.Google Scholar
Phenice, T. 1969. A newly developed visual method of sexing in the os pubis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 30:297–301.Google Scholar
Powell, M. L. and Cook, D. C. 2005. The Myth of Syphilis: The Natural History of Treponematosis in North America. Gainsville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Powers, N. 2008. Age at death estimation. In: `Powers, N. (ed.) Human Osteology Method Statement. London: Museum of London.Google Scholar
Raxter, M. H., Auerbach, B. M. and Ruff, C. B. 2006. Revision of the Fully technique for estimating statures. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 130:274–384.Google Scholar
Resnick, D. 2002. Diagnosis of Bone and Joint Disorders, 4th ed. London: WB Saunders Co.Google Scholar
Roberts, C. A. 2009. Human Remains in Archaeology: A Handbook. York: Council for British Archaeology.Google Scholar
Roberts, C. A and Buikstra, J. E. 2003. The Bioarchaeology of Tuberculosis: A Global View on a Reemerging Disease. Gainsville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
`Roberts, C. A, `Lewis, M. E. and `Manchester, K. (eds.) 2002. The Past and Present of Leprosy: Archaeological, Historical, Palaeopathological and Clinical Approaches – Proceeding of the International Congress on the Evolution and Palaeoepidemiology the Infectious Diseases 3 (ICEPID). BAR Report S1045. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Roberts, C. A. and Manchester, K. 1995. The Archaeology of Disease, 2nd ed. Stroud: Sutton Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Rogers, J. and Waldron, T. 1995. A Field Guide to Joint Disease in Archaeology. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Rogers, J., Waldron, T., Dieppe, P. and Watt, I. 1987. Arthropathies in palaeopathology: The basis of classification according to most probable cause. Journal of Archaeological Science 14:179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, T. L. 1999. A visual method of determining the sex of skeletal remains using the distal humerus. Journal of Forensic Sciences 44:57–60.Google Scholar
Ruff, C. 2002. Variation in human body size and shape. Annual Review of Anthropology 31:211–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, S., Hoppa, R. and Southern, R. 1993. Diaphyseal growth in a nineteenth-century skeletal sample of subadults from St Thomas’ Church, Belleville, Ontario. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 3:265–281.Google Scholar
Scheuer, L. and Black, S. 2000. Developmental Juvenile Osteology. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Scheuer, L. and Black, S. 2004. The Juvenile Skeleton. London: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schulter-Ellis, F. P., Hayek, L. C. and Schmidt, D. J. 1985. Determination of sex with a discriminate analysis of new pelvic bone measurements: Part II. Journal of Forensic Sciences 30:178–185.Google Scholar
Schulter-Ellis, F. P., Schmidt, D. J., Hayek, L. C. and Craig, J. 1983. Determination of sex with a discriminate analysis of new pelvis bone measurements: Part I. Journal of Forensic Sciences 28:169–180.Google Scholar
Schutkowski, H. 1990. Zur Geschlechtsdiagnose von Kinderskeletten. Morphognostische, metrische und diskriminanzanalytische Untersuchugen. Doctoral thesis, University of Goettingen.Google Scholar
Schutkowski, H. 1993. Sex determination of infant and juvenile skeletons: 1. Morphognotic features. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 90:199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, G. R. and Turner, C. G. II. 1997. The Anthropology of Modern Human Teeth: Dental Anthropology and its Variation in Recent Human Populations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Singh, G., Singh, S. P. and Singh, S. 1973. Identification of sex from the radius. Journal of the Indian Academy of Forensic Sciences 13:10–16.Google Scholar
Singh, I. J. and Gunberg, D. L. 1970. Estimation of age at death in human males from quantitative histology of bone fragments. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 33:373–382.Google Scholar
Smith, B. H. 1991. Standards of human tooth formation and dental age assessment. In: `Kelley, M. A and `Larsen, C. S. (eds.) Advances in Dental Anthropology, pp. 143–168. New York: Wiley-Liss.Google Scholar
Steele, D. G. 1970. Estimation of stature from fragments of long limb bones. In: `Stewart, T. D. (ed.) Personal Identification in Mass Disasters, pp. 85–97. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Steele, D. G. and Bramblett, C. A. 1988. The Anatomy and Biology of the Human Skeleton. College Station: Texas AandM University Press.Google Scholar
Steele, J. 2000. Skeletal indicators of handedness. In: `Cox, M. and `Mays, S. (eds.) Human Osteology in Archaeology and Forensic Science, pp. 307–323. London: Greenwich Medical Media.Google Scholar
Steinbock, R. T. 1976. Paleopathological Diagnosis and Interpretation: Bone Diseases in Ancient Human Populations. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Stewart, T. D. 1979. Essentials of Forensic Anthropology Especially as Developed in the United States. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Storm, R. A. and Knüsel, C. J. 2005. Fluctuating asymmetry: A potential osteological application. In: `Zakrzewski, S. R. and `Clegg, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Conference of the British Association for Biological Anthropology and Osteoarchaeology, pp. 113–118. BAR Report S1383. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Stout, S. D. 1992. Methods of determining age at death using bone microstructure. In: `Saunders, S. R. and `Katzenberg, M. A. (eds.) Skeletal Biology of Past Peoples, pp. 21–35. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sundick, R. I. 1978. Human skeletal growth and age determination. Homo 29:228–249.Google Scholar
Susanne, C. 1980. Socioeconomic differences in growth patterns. In: `Johnston, F. E., `Roche, A. F. and `Susanne, C. (eds.) Human Physical Growth and Maturation: Methods and Factors, pp. 329–356. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Tibbetts, G. L. 1981. Estimation of stature from the vertebral column in American Blacks. Journal of Forensic Sciences 26:715–723.Google Scholar
Todd, T. W. 1920. Age changes in the pubic bone I: The male white pubis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 3:285–334.Google Scholar
Todd, T. W. 1921. Age changes in the pubic bone. III: The pubis of the white female. IV: The pubis of the female white-negro hybrid. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 4:1–70.Google Scholar
Trotter, M. 1970. Estimation of stature from intact limb bones. In: `Stewart, T. D. (ed.) Personal Identification in Mass Disasters, pp. 71–84. Washington, DC: National Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
Turner, C. G. II, Nichol, C. R. and Scott, G. R. 1991. Scoring procedures for key morphological traits of the permanent dentition: The Arizona State University dental anthropology system. In: `Kelley, M. A. and `Larsen, C. S. (eds.) Advances in Dental Anthropology, pp. 13–31. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Tyrell, A. 2000. Skeletal non-metric traits and the assessment of inter- and intra-population diversity: Past problems and future potential. In: `Cox, M. and `Mays, S. (eds.) Human Osteology in Archaeology and Forensic Science, pp. 289–306. London: Greenwich Medical Media.Google Scholar
Ubelaker, D. H. 1989. Human Skeletal Remains: Excavation, Analysis, Interpretation, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Taraxacum.Google Scholar
Van Beek, G. C. 1983. Dental Morphology: An Illustrated Guide. Bristol: Wright PSG.Google Scholar
Vasiliadis, L., Darling, A. I. and Levers, B. G. H. 1983a. The amount and distribution of sclerotic human root dentine. Archives of Oral Biology 28:645–649.Google Scholar
Vasiliadis, L., Darling, A. I. and Levers, B. G. H. 1983b. The histology of sclerotic human root dentine. Archives of Oral Biology 28:693–700.Google Scholar
Vlak, D., Roksandic, M. and Schillaci, M. A. 2008. Greater sciatic notch as a sex indicator in juveniles. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 137:309–315.Google Scholar
Waldron, T. 1994. Counting the Dead. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Waldron, T. 2009. Palaeopathology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weston, D. A. 2008. Investigating the specificity of periosteal reactions in pathology museum specimens. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 137:48–59.Google Scholar
Weston, D. A. 2012. Non-specific infection in palaeopathology: Interpreting periosteal reactions. In: `Grauer, A. L. (ed.) Companion to Paleopathology, pp. 492–512. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
White, T. D. and Folkens, P. A. 2000. Human Osteology. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
White, T. D. and Folkens, P. A. 2005. The Human Bone Manual. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wood, J. and Milner, G. 1994. Reply. Current Anthropology 35:631–637.Google Scholar
Wood, J., Milner, G., Harpending, H. and Weiss, K. 1992. The osteological paradox. Current Anthropology 33:343–370.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×