Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T00:41:45.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2022

Ido Geiger
Ido Geiger
Affiliation:
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Kant and the Claims of the Empirical World
A Transcendental Reading of the <I>Critique of the Power of Judgment</I>
 , pp. 216 - 222
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, Henry E. Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the “Critique of Aesthetic Judgment.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E. “Reflective Judgment and the Application of Logic to Nature: Kant’s Deduction of the Principle of Purposiveness as an Answer to Hume.” In Essays on Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 177–188.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E. “Kant’s Antinomy of Teleological Judgment.” In Essays on Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 201–214.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. “How to Save Kant’s Deduction of Taste as Objective?” In Interpreting Kant’s “Critiques.” Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003, pp. 285–306.Google Scholar
Banham, Gary. Kant and the Ends of Aesthetics. Houndmills: Macmillan Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Baum, Manfred. “Kants Prinzip der Zweckmäßigkeit und Hegels Realisierung des Begriffs.” In Hegel und die “Kritik der Urteilskraft,” edited by Fulda, Hans-Friedrich and Horstmann, Rolf-Peter. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1988, pp. 158–173.Google Scholar
Bellori, Giovanni Pietro. The Lives of the Modern Painters, Sculptors and Architects. Translated by Wohl, Alice Sedgwick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Biemel, Walter. Die Bedeutung von Kants Begründung der Ästhetik für die Philosophie der Kunst. Köln: Kölner Universitäts-Verlag, 1959.Google Scholar
Blumenbach, Johann Friedrich. Über den Bildungstrieb. Göttingen: Johann Christian Dieterich, 1789.Google Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard. “Die Schönheit der Kristalle und das Spiel der Erkenntniskräfte.” In Autographen, Dokumente und Berichte: zu Edition, Amtsgeschäften und Werk Immanuel Kants, edited by Brandt, Reinhard and Stark, Werner. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1994, pp. 19–57.Google Scholar
Breitenbach, Angela. “Mechanical Explanation of Nature and Its Limits in Kant’s ‘Critique of Judgment’.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Sciences 37 (2006): 694–711.Google Scholar
Breitenbach, Angela. Die Analogie von Vernunft und Natur: Eine Umweltphilosophie nach Kant. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2009.Google Scholar
Breitenbach, Angela. “Teleology in Biology: A Kantian Perspective.” Kant Yearbook 1 (2009): 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brittan, Gordon G. Jr. Kant’s Theory of Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. Kant’s Life and Thought. Translated by Haden, James. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew. “Kant on the Normativity of Taste: The Role of Aesthetic Ideas.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (2007): 430–431.Google Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius. On Invention. The Best Kind of Orator. Topics. Translated by Hubbell, H. M.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1949.Google Scholar
Cohen, Alix. “Kant on Epigenesis, Monogenesis and Human Nature: The Biological Premises of Anthropology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (2006): 675–693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, Alix A. Kant and the Human Sciences: Biology, Anthropology and History. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Alix A. “Kant on Beauty and Cognition: The Aesthetic Dimension of Cognition.” In Thinking about Science and Reflecting on Art: Bringing Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Science Together, edited by Bueno, Otávio, Darby, George, French, Steven, and Rickles, Dean. London: Routledge, 2018, pp. 140–154.Google Scholar
Cooper, Andrew. “Kant and Experimental Philosophy.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (2017): 265–286.Google Scholar
Cornell, John F. “Newton of the Grassblade? Darwin and the Problem of Organic Teleology.” Isis 77 (1986): 404–421.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, and Gallison, Peter. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books, 2007.Google Scholar
Dijksterhuis, Eduard J. Die Mechanisierung des Weltbildes. Berlin: Springer, 1956.Google Scholar
Düsing, Klaus. “Beauty as the Transition from Nature to Freedom in Kant’s ‘Critique of Judgement’.” Noûs 24 (1990): 79–92.Google Scholar
Düsing, Klaus. “Naturteleologie und Metaphysik bei Kant und Hegel.” In Hegel und die “Kritik der Urteilskraft,” edited by Fulda, Hans-Friedrich and Horstmann, Rolf-Peter. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1990, pp. 139–157.Google Scholar
Euler, Leonhard. Letters to a German Princess on Different Subjects of Physics and Philosophy. Translated by Hunt, Henry. London: H. Murray, 1795.Google Scholar
Falkenburg, Brigitte. Kants Kosmologie: Die Wissenschaftliche Revolution der Naturphilosophie im 18. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann, 2000.Google Scholar
Förster, Eckart. Kant’s Final Synthesis: An Essay on the “Opus Postumum.” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Förster, Eckart. “Die Bedeutung von §§ 76, 77 der Kritik der Urteilskraft für die Entwicklung der nachkantischen Philosophie [Teil 1].” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 56 (2002): 169–190.Google Scholar
Förster, Eckart. “Die Bedeutung von §§ 76, 77 der Kritik der Urteilskraft für die Entwicklung der nachkantischen Philosophie [Teil 2].” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 56 (2002): 321–345.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, Gideon. “Kritik und Rehabilitierung des Mechanismus.” Konsequent 6 (1984): 121–134.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, Gideon. Atom and Individual in the Age of Newton: On the Genesis of the Mechanistic World View. Translated by McLaughlin, Peter. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1986.Google Scholar
Fricke, Christel. Kants Theorie des reinen Geschmacksurteils. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1990.Google Scholar
Fricke, Christel. “Kants Theorie der schönen Form.” In Akten des Siebenten Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, II.1., edited by Funke, Gerhard. Bonn: Bouvier, 1991, pp. 623–632.Google Scholar
Friedlander, Eli. “Meaning and Aesthetic Judgment in Kant.” Philosophical Topics 34 (2006): 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, Ido. “Is the Assumption of a Systematic Whole of Empirical Concepts a Necessary Condition of Knowledge?” Kant-Studien 94 (2003): 273–298.Google Scholar
Geiger, Ido. “Is Teleological Judgment (Still) Necessary? Kant’s Arguments in the Analytic and in the Dialectic of Teleological Judgment.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (2009): 533–566.Google Scholar
Geiger, Ido. “Transcendental Idealism in the Third Critique .” In Kant’s Idealism. New Interpretations of a Controversial Doctrine, edited by Schulting, Dennis and Verburgt, Jacco. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010, pp. 71–88.Google Scholar
Geiger, Ido. “Purposiveness: Regulative or Realized? Hegel’s Response to Kant’s Antinomy of Teleological Judgment.” Hegel-Jahrbuch (2016): 498–504.Google Scholar
Geiger, Ido. “Kant on the Analytic-Synthetic or Mechanistic Model of Causal Explanation.” Kant Yearbook 9 (2017): 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, Ido. “Aesthetic Normativity and the Acquisition of Empirical Concepts.” Con-Textos Kantianos 12 (2020): 71–104.Google Scholar
Geiger, Ido. “Kant on Aesthetic Ideas, Rational Ideas and the Subject-Matter of Art.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 79 (2021): 186–199.Google Scholar
Geiger, Ido. “Methodology of the Teleological Power of Judgment.” In The Kantian Mind, edited by Baiasu, Sorin and Timmons, Mark. London: Routledge. [Forthcoming]Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. “Empirical Concepts and the Content of Experience.” European Journal of Philosophy 14 (2006): 349–372.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. The Normativity of Nature: Essays on Kant’s “Critique of Judgment.” Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. “On the Key to Kant’s Critique of Taste.” In The Normativity of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 32–52.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. “Lawfulness without a Law: Kant on the Free Play of Imagination and Understanding.” In The Normativity of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 53–93.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. “Reflective Judgment and Taste.” In The Normativity of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 135–147.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. “Thinking the Particular as Contained under the Universal.” In The Normativity of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 148–169.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. “Aesthetic Judgment and Perceptual Normativity.” In The Normativity of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 170–201.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. “Kant on Understanding Organisms as Natural Purposes.” In The Normativity of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 255–280.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. “Two Kinds of Mechanical Inexplicability in Kant and Aristotle.” In The Normativity of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 281–315.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. “Oughts without Intentions: A Kantian Approach to Biological Functions.” In The Normativity of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 332–345.Google Scholar
von Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. “Fortunate Encounter.” In Scientific Studies, edited and translated by Miller, Douglas. New York: Suhrkamp, 1998, pp. 18–21.Google Scholar
Gotshalk, Dilman Walter. “Form and Expression in Kant’s Aesthetics.” British Journal of Aesthetics 7 (1967): 250–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goy, Ina. Kants Theorie der Biologie: Ein Kommentar. Eine Lesart. Eine Historische Einordnung. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2017.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Claims of Taste, second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Organisms and the Unity of Science.” In Kant and the Exact Sciences, edited by Watkins, Eric. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, pp. 259–281.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Kant on the Purity of the Ugly.” In Values of Beauty: Historical Essays in Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 141–162.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “From Nature to Morality: Kant’s New Argument in the ‘Critique of Teleological Judgment’.” In Kant’s System of Nature and Freedom: Selected Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005, pp. 314–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “The Harmony of the Faculties Revisited.” In Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Critical Philosophy, edited by Kukla, Rebecca. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 162–193.Google Scholar
Hakfoort, Casper. Optics in the Age of Euler: Conceptions of the Nature of Light 1700–1795. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Hanna, Robert. Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Hanna, Robert. “Kant and Nonconceptual Content.” European Journal of Philosophy 13 (2005): 247–290.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Science of Logic, edited and translated by Di Giovanni, George. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. “Kant’s Explanation of Aesthetic Judgment.” In Aesthetic Judgment and the Moral Image of the World: Studies in Kant. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992, pp. 29–56.Google Scholar
Hume, David. An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, edited by Beauchamp, Tom L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Illetterati, Luca. “Teleological Judgments: Between Technique and Nature.” In Kant’s Theory of Biology, edited by Goy, Ina and Watkins, Eric. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2014, pp. 81–98.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark L. “Kant’s Unified Theory of Beauty.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 38 (1979): 167–178.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Patricia. Kant’s Transcendental Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Kreines, James. “Kant on the Laws of Nature: Laws, Necessitation, and the Limitation of Our Knowledge.” European Journal of Philosophy 17 (2009): 527–558.Google Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred. “Kant’s Conception of ‘Hume’s Problem’.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 21 (1983): 175–194.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. New Essays on Human Understanding, edited and translated by Remnant, Peter and Bennett, Jonathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Philosophical Essays, edited and translated by Ariew, Roger and Garber, Daniel. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, 1989.Google Scholar
Lenoir, Timothy. “Blumenbach and Vital Materialism in German Biology.” ISIS 71 (1980): 77–108.Google Scholar
Lenoir, Timothy. The Strategy of Life: Teleology and Mechanics in Nineteenth Century German Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. “Kant’s Leading Thread in the Analytic of the Beautiful.” In Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Critical Philosophy, edited by Kukla, Rebecca. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 194–219.Google Scholar
Lorand, Ruth. “Free and Dependent Beauty: A Puzzling Issue.” British Journal of Aesthetics 29 (1989): 32–40.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur O. “Kant and Evolution.” In Forerunners of Darwin 1745–1859, edited by Glass, Bentley, Temkin, Owsei, and Strauss, William L. Jr. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1968, pp. 173–206.Google Scholar
Lüthe, Rudolf. “Kants Lehre von den ästhetischen Ideen.” Kant-Studien 75 (1984): 65–74.Google Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf A. “Regulative and Reflective Uses of Purposiveness in Kant.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (Supplement) (1991): 49–63.Google Scholar
Matherne, Samantha. “Kant and the Art of schematism.” Kantian Review 19 (2014): 181–205.Google Scholar
Matherne, Samantha. “Images and Kant’s Theory of Perception.” Ergo 2 (2015): 737–777.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst. “The Multiple Meanings of Teleological.” In Towards a New Philosophy of Biology: Observations of an Evolutionist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988, pp. 38–66.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Peter. “Blumenbach und der Bildungstrieb: Zum Verhältnis von epigenetischer Embryologie und typologischem Artbegriff.” Medizinhistorisches Journal 17 (1982): 357–372.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Peter. Kant’s Critique of Teleology in Biological Explanation: Antinomy and Teleology. Lewiston: Edwin Mellon Press, 1990.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Peter. “Newtonian Biology and Kant’s Mechanistic Concept of Causality.” In Akten des Siebenten Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, edited by Funke, Gerhard. Bonn: Bouvier, 1991.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Peter. “Mechanical Explanation in the ‘Critique of the Teleological Power of Judgment’.” In Kant’s Theory of Biology, edited by Goy, Ina and Watkins, Eric. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2014, pp. 149–166.Google Scholar
Meerbote, Ralf. “Reflection on Beauty.” In Essays in Kant’s Aesthetics, edited by Cohen, Ted and Guyer, Paul. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1982, pp. 21–54.Google Scholar
Messina, James. “Kant’s Necessitation Account of Laws and the Nature of Natures.” In Kant and the Laws of Nature, edited by Massimi, Michela and Breitenbach, Angela. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, pp. 131–149.Google Scholar
Møller Pedersen, Kurt. “Leonhard Euler’s Wave Theory of Light.” Perspectives on Science 16 (2008): 392–416.Google Scholar
Nuzzo, Angelica. Kant and the Unity of Reason. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Panofsky, Erwin. Idea: A Concept in Art Theory. Translated by Peake, Joseph J. S.. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Pliny, . Natural History. Translated by Rackham, H.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Quarfood, Marcel. “The Antinomy of Teleological Judgment: What It Is and How It Is Solved.” In Kant’s Theory of Biology, edited by Goy, Ina and Watkins, Eric. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2014, pp. 167–183.Google Scholar
Reiter, Aviv. “Kant and Hegel on the End and Means of Fine Art: From an A-Historical to a Historical Conception of Art.” Hegel-Jahrbuch (2017): 35–40.Google Scholar
Reiter, Aviv. The End and Historicity of the Fine Arts: From the Idealist Theory of the Renaissance to the Formation of a Systematic-Historical Conception in Hegel’s Philosophy of Art. Ph.D. dissertation, Tel-Aviv University, 2020.Google Scholar
Reiter, Aviv. “Kant on the Aesthetic Ideas of Beautiful Nature.” British Journal of Aesthetics 61 (2021): 403–419.Google Scholar
Reiter, Aviv, and Geiger, Ido. “Kant on Form, Function and Decoration.” Proceedings of the European Society of Aesthetics 7 (2015): 234–245.Google Scholar
Reiter, Aviv, and Geiger, Ido. “Natural Beauty, Fine Art and the Relation between Them.” Kant-Studien 109 (2018): 72–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Robert J. “Kant and Blumenbach on the Bildungstrieb: A Historical Misunderstanding.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 31 (2000): 11–32.Google Scholar
Rind, Miles. “Can Kant’s Deduction of Judgments of Taste be Saved?” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 84 (2002): 20–45.Google Scholar
Roe, Shirley A. Matter, Life, and Generation: Eighteenth-Century Embryology and the Haller-Wolff Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Roth, Siegfried. “Kant und die Biologie seiner Zeit (§§79–81).” In Immanuel Kant: Kritik der Urteilskraft, edited by Höffe, Otfried. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2008, pp. 275–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rush, Fred L. Jr. “The Harmony of the Faculties.” Kant-Studien 92 (2001): 38–61.Google Scholar
Seel, Gerhard. “Über den Grund der Lust an schönen Gegenständen. Kritische Fragen an die Ästhetik Kants.” In Kant: Analysen, Probleme, Kritik, Band III, edited by Oberer, Hariolf and Seel, Gerhard. Würzberg: Königshausen & Neumann, 1988, pp. 317–356.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Teufel, Thomas. “Wholes that Cause Their Parts: Organic Self-reproduction and the Reality of Biological Teleology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Sciences 42 (2011): 252–260.Google Scholar
Uehling, Theodore E. Jr. The Notion of Form in Kant’s “Critique of Aesthetic Judgment.” The Hague: Mouton, 1971.Google Scholar
Walker, Ralph C. S. “Induction and Transcendental Argument.” In Transcendental Arguments: Problems and Prospects, edited by Stern, Robert. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999, pp. 13–29.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric. “Kant’s Model of Causality: Causal Powers, Laws, and Kant’s Reply to Hume.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (2004): 449–488.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric. Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric. “The Antinomy of Teleological Judgment.” Kant Yearbook 1 (2009): 197–221.Google Scholar
Wicks, Robert. “Dependent Beauty as the Appreciation of Teleological Style.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (1997): 387–400.Google Scholar
Williams, Jessica J. “‘The Image of a Four-Footed Animal in General’: Kant on Empirical Schemata and the System of Nature.” HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 10 (2020): 1–23.Google Scholar
Winckelmann, Johann Joachim. History of the Art of Antiquity. Translated by Mallgrave, Harry Francis. Los Angeles, CA: Getty Research Institute, 2006.Google Scholar
Zammito, John H. The Genesis of Kant’s “Critique of Judgment.” Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Zinkin, Melissa. “Kant and the Pleasure of ‘Mere Reflection’.” Inquiry 55 (2012): 433–453.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel. Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the “Critique of Judgment.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Zumbach, Clark. “Kant’s Argument for the Autonomy of Biology.” Nature and System 3 (1981): 67–79.Google Scholar
Zumbach, Clark. The Transcendent Science: Kant’s Conception of Biological Methodology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1984.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Ido Geiger, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
  • Book: Kant and the Claims of the Empirical World
  • Online publication: 30 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108992565.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Ido Geiger, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
  • Book: Kant and the Claims of the Empirical World
  • Online publication: 30 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108992565.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Ido Geiger, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
  • Book: Kant and the Claims of the Empirical World
  • Online publication: 30 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108992565.009
Available formats
×