Aamari, E. and Levrard, C. 2019. Nonasymptotic rates for manifold, tangent space and curvature estimation. Ann. Statist., 47(1), 177–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, M. and van Moerbeke, P. 2001. Darboux transforms on band matrices, weights, and associated polynomials. Int. Math. Res. Not., 935–984.Google Scholar

Ahiezer, N. I. 1965. Lektsii po teorii approksimatsii, 2nd edition. Izdat. “Nauka”, Moscow.Google Scholar

Akhiezer, N. I. 1965. The Classical Moment Problem and Some Related Questions in Analysis, trans. N. Kemmer. Hafner, New York.Google Scholar

Alaoui, A. and Mahoney, M. 2015. Fast randomized kernel ridge regression with statistical guarantees. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS, pp. 775–783.Google Scholar

Alpay, D. (ed.). 2003. Reproducing Kernel Spaces and Applications. Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, vol. 143. Birkhäuser, Basel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anjos, M. and Lasserre, J. B. (eds.). 2011. Handbook of Semidefinite, Conic and Polynomial Optimization. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 166. Springer, New York, NY.Google Scholar

Appell, P. 1890. Sur une classe de polynômes à deux variables et le calcul approché des intégrales doubles. Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Sci. Math. Sci. Phys., 4(2), H1–H20.Google Scholar

Aronszajn, N. 1950. Theory of reproducing kernels. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 68, 337– 404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Askari, A., Yang, F. and El Ghaoui, L. 2018. Kernel-based outlier detection using the inverse Christoffel function. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.06775.Google Scholar

Bach, F. 2013. Sharp analysis of low-rank kernel matrix approximations. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Learning Theory, PMLR, pp. 185–209.Google Scholar

Bach, F. 2017. On the equivalence between kernel quadrature rules and random feature expansions. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 18(21), 1–38.Google Scholar

Baran, M. 1988. Siciak’s extremal function of convex sets in C^N . Ann. Polon. Math., 48(3), 275–280.Google Scholar

Baran, M. 1992. Bernstein type theorems for compact sets in Rⁿ. J. Approx. Theory, 69(2), 156–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baran, M., Białas-Cież, L. and Milówka, B. 2013. On the best exponent in Markov inequality. Potential Anal., 38(2), 635–651.Google Scholar

Barvinok, A. 2002. A Course on Convexity. American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I.Google Scholar

Batschelet, E. 1981. Circular Statistics in Biology. Academic Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Bayer, C. and Teichmann, J. 2006. The proof of Tchakaloff’s theorem. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 134(10), 3035–3040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beckermann, B., Putinar, M., Saff, E. B. and Stylianopoulos, N. 2021. Perturbations of Christoffel–Darboux kernels: detection of outliers. Found. Comp. Math., 21(1), 71–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bedford, E. and Taylor, B. A. 1986. The complex equilibrium measure of a symmetric convex set in Rⁿ. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 294(2), 705–717.Google Scholar

Belkin, M. and Niyogi, P. 2008. Towards a theoretical foundation for Laplacian-based manifold methods. J. Comput. System Sci., 74(8), 1289–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berman, R. J., Boucksom, S. and Witt Nyström, D. 2011. Fekete points and convergence towards equilibrium measures on complex manifolds. Acta Math., 207(1), 1–27.Google Scholar

Berman, R. J. 2009. Bergman kernels and equilibrium measures for line bundles over projective manifolds. Amer. J. Math., 131(5), 1485–1524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bleher, P., Lyubich, M. and Roeder, R. 2020. Lee–Yang–Fisher zeros for the DHL and 2D rational dynamics, II. Global pluripotential interpretation. J. Geom. Anal., 30(1), 777–833.Google Scholar

Bloom, T. 1997. Orthogonal polynomials in Cⁿ. Indiana Univ. Math. J., 46(2), 427–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloom, T. and Levenberg, N. 2003. Weighted pluripotential theory in C^N . Amer. J. Math., 125(1), 57–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloom, T. and Shiffman, B. 2007. Zeros of random polynomials on C^m. Math. Res. Lett., 14(3), 469–479.Google Scholar

Bloom, T., Levenberg, N., Piazzon, F. and Wielonsky, F. 2015. Bernstein–Markov: a survey. Dolomites Res. Notes Approx., 8(Special Issue), 75–91.Google Scholar

Bochnak, J., Coste, M. and Roy, M.-F. 1998. Real Algebraic Geometry. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3) [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas (3)], vol. 36. Springer, Berlin. Translated from the 1987 French original, revised by the authors.Google Scholar

Bos, L. P. 1989. Asymptotics for the Christoffel function for the equilibrium measure on a ball in R^m. In Approximation Theory VI, Vol. I (College Station, TX, 1989). Academic Press, Boston, MA, pp. 97–100.Google Scholar

Bos, L. P. 1994. Asymptotics for the Christoffel function for Jacobi like weights on a ball in R^m. New Zealand J. Math., 23(2), 99–109.Google Scholar

Bos, L. P., Della Vecchia, B. and Mastroianni, G. 1998. On the asymptotics of Christoffel functions for centrally symmetric weight functions on the ball in R^d. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Functional Analysis and Approximation Theory, Vol. I (Acquafredda di Maratea, 1996). I, no. 52. Sede della Società Palermo, pp. 277–290.Google Scholar

Bos, L. P., Brudnyi, A. and Levenberg, N. 2010. On polynomial inequalities on exponential curves in Cⁿ. Constr. Approx., 31(1), 139–147.Google Scholar

Breiding, P., Kališnik, S., Sturmfels, B. and Weinstein, M. 2018. Learning algebraic varieties from samples. Rev. Mat. Complut., 31(3), 545–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brennan, Dzh. È. 2005. Thomson’s theorem on mean-square polynomial approximation. Algebra i Analiz, 17(2), 1–32.Google Scholar

Brudnyi, A. 2008. On local behavior of holomorphic functions along complex submanifolds of C^N . Invent. Math., 173(2), 315–363.Google Scholar

Bubenik, P. 2015. Statistical topological data analysis using persistence landscapes. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 16(1), 77–102.Google Scholar

Bueno, M. I. and Marcellán, F. 2004. Darboux transformation and perturbation of linear functionals. Linear Algebra Appl., 384, 215–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burns, D., Levenberg, N., Ma’u, S. and Révész, Sz. 2010. Monge–Ampère measures for convex bodies and Bernstein–Markov type inequalities. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 362(12), 6325–6340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butzer, P. L. and Fehér, F. (eds.). 1981. E. B. Christoffel: The Influence of his Work on Mathematics and the Physical Sciences. Birkhäuser, Basel–Boston, MA. Including expanded versions of lectures given at the International Christoffel Symposium held in Aachen and Monschau, November 8–11, 1979.Google Scholar

Cantero, M. J., Marcellán, F., Moral, L. and Velázquez, L. 2016. Darboux transformations for CMV matrices. Adv. Math., 298, 122–206.Google Scholar

Carleman, T. 1932. Application de la théorie des équations intégrales linéaires aux systèmes d’équations différentielles non linéaires. Acta Math., 59(1), 63–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlsson, G. 2009. Topology and data. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 46(2), 255–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chatterjee, S. and Hadi, A.S. 1986. Influential observations, high leverage points, and outliers in linear regression. Statis. Sci., 1(3), 379–393.Google Scholar

Chazal, F., Cohen-Steiner, D. and Mérigot, Q. 2011. Geometric inference for probability measures. Found. Comput. Math., 11(6), 733–751.Google Scholar

Chazal, F., Glisse, M., Labruère, C. and Michel, B. 2014. Convergence rates for persistence diagram estimation in topological data analysis. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, pp. 163–171.Google Scholar

Chevalier, J. 1976. Estimation du support et du contour du support d’une loi de probabilité. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat., 12(4), 339–364.Google Scholar

Clarkson, K. L. and Woodruff, D. P. 2013. Low rank approximation and regression in input sparsity time. In ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. ACM, pp. 81–90.Google Scholar

Coman, D. and Poletsky, E. A. 2010. Polynomial estimates, exponential curves and Diophantine approximation. Math. Res. Lett., 17(6), 1125–1136.Google Scholar

Conway, J. B. 1991. The Theory of Subnormal Operators. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 36. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, D., Little, J. and O’Shea, D. 2007. Ideals, Varieties, and Algorithms: An Introduction to Computational Algebraic Geometry and Commutative Algebra. Springer Science and Business Media, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cucker, F. and Smale, S. 2002. On the mathematical foundations of learning. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 39(1), 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cuevas, A. and Fraiman, R. 1997. A plug-in approach to support estimation. Ann. Statist., 25(6), 2300–2312.Google Scholar

Cuevas, A., González-Manteiga, W. and Rodríguez-Casal, A. 2006a. Plug-in estimation of general level sets. Aust. N. Z. J. Stat., 48(1), 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cuevas, A., González-Manteiga, W. and Rodríguez-Casal, A. 2006b. Plug-in estimation of general level sets. Aust. N. Z. J. Stat., 48(1), 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curto, R. and Fialkow, L.A. 2005. Truncated K-moment problems in several variables. J. Operator Theory, 54, 189–226.Google Scholar

Daras, N. J. 2014. Markov-type inequalities with applications in multivariate approximation theory. In Topics in Mathematical Analysis and Applications. Springer Optimization and its Applications, vol. 94. Springer, Cham, pp. 277–314.Google Scholar

Das, S. and Giannakis, D. 2019. Delay-coordinate maps and the spectra of Koopman operators. J. Stat. Phys., 175(6), 1107–1145.Google Scholar

Davis, J. and Goadrich, M. 2006. The relationship between Precision-Recall and ROC curves. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning. Association for Computing Machnery, pp. 233–240.Google Scholar

de Branges, L. 1968. Hilbert Spaces of Entire Functions. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar

de Castro, Y., Gamboa, F., Henrion, D., Hess, R. and Lasserre, J. B. 2019. Approximate optimal designs for multivariate polynomial regression. Ann. Statist., 47, 127–155.Google Scholar

Demailly, J.-P. 1985. Mesures de Monge–Ampère et caractérisation géométrique des variétés algébriques affines. Mém. Soc. Math. Fr. (N.S.), 19, 124.Google Scholar

Demailly, J.-P. 2013. Applications of pluripotential theory to algebraic geometry. In Pluripotential Theory. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 2075. Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 143–263.Google Scholar

DeVore, R. A. 1972. The Approximation of Continuous Functions by Positive Linear Operators. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 293. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar

Devroye, L. and Wise, G. L. 1980. Detection of abnormal behavior via nonparametric estimation of the support. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 38(3), 480–488.Google Scholar

Dinew, S. 2019. Lectures on pluripotential theory on compact Hermitian manifolds. In Complex Non-Kähler Geometry. Lecture Notes in Mathemtaics, vol. 2246. Springer, Cham, pp. 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donner, K. 1982. Extension of Positive Operators and Korovkin Theorems. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 904. Springer, berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drineas, P., Magdon-Ismail, M., Mahoney, M. W. and Woodruff, D. P. 2012. Fast approximation of matrix coherence and statistical leverage. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 13, 3475–3506.Google Scholar

Dubois, D. W. and Efroymson, G. 1970. Algebraic theory of real varieties. I. In Studies and Essays (Presented to Yu-why Chen on his 60th Birthday, April 1, 1970). Mathematical research Center, National Taiwan University, Taipei, pp. 107–135.Google Scholar

Dunford, N. and Schwartz, J. 1958. Linear Operators Part I: General Theory. Interscience, New York, NY.Google Scholar

Dunkl, C. F. and Xu, Y. 2014. Orthogonal Polynomials of Several Variables, 2nd edn. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 155. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Durrett, R. 2019. Probability: Theory and Examples, vol. 49. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckhoff, K. S. 1993. Accurate and efficient reconstruction of discontinuous functions from truncated series expansions. Math. Comp., 61(204), 745–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edelsbrunner, H. and Harer, J. 2008. Persistent homology-a survey. Contemp. Math., 453, 257–282.Google Scholar

Fefferman, C., Mitter, S. K. and Narayanan, H. 2016. Testing the manifold hypothesis. J. Amer. Math. Soc., 29(4), 983–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foias, C. and Frazho, A. E. 1990. The Commutant Lifting Approach to Interpolation Problems. Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, vol. 44. Birkhäuser, Basel.Google Scholar

Freud, G. 1969. Orthogonale Polynome. Birkhäuser, Basel–Stuttgart. Lehrbücher und Monographien aus dem Gebiete der Exakten Wissenschaften, Mathematische Reihe, Band 33.Google Scholar

Gaier, D. 1987. Lectures on Complex Approximation, trans. Renate McLaughlin. Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Garza, L. and Marcellán, F. 2009. Szegö transformations and rational spectral transformations for associated polynomials. J. Comput. Appl. Math., 233(3), 730– 738.Google Scholar

Gautschi, W. 1986. On the sensitivity of orthogonal polynomials to perturbations in the moments. Numer. Math., 48(4), 369–382.Google Scholar

Geffroy, J. 1964. Sur un probleme d’estimation géométrique. Publ. Inst. Statist. Univ. Paris, 13, 191–210.Google Scholar

Genovese, C. R., Perone-Pacifico, M., Verdinelli, I. and Wasserman, L. 2012a. Manifold estimation and singular deconvolution under Hausdorff loss. Ann. Statist., 40(2), 941–963.Google Scholar

Genovese, C. R., Perone-Pacifico, M., Verdinelli, I. and Wasserman, L. 2012b. Minimax manifold estimation. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 13(1), 1263–1291.Google Scholar

Geronimo, J. S. and Woerdeman, H. 2007. Two variable orthogonal polynomials on the bicircle and structured matrices. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 29(3), 796–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geronimo, J. S. and Woerdeman, H. J. 2004. Positive extensions, Fejér–Riesz factorization and autoregressive filters in two variables. Ann. of Math. (2), 160(3), 839–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ghrist, R. 2008. Barcodes: the persistent topology of data. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 45(1), 61–75.Google Scholar

Gómez-Ullate, D., Kamran, N. and Milson, R. 2010. Exceptional orthogonal polynomials and the Darboux transformation. J. Phys. A, 43(43), 434016, 16.Google Scholar

Gorbachuk, M. L. and Gorbachuk, V. I. 1997. M. G. Krein’s lectures on entire operators. Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, vol. 97. Birkhäuser, Basel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grant, M. and Boyd, S. 2014. CVX: Matlab Software for Disciplined Convex Programming, version 2.1. CVX Research. Available at: http://cvxr.com/cvx/Google Scholar

Gröbner, W. 1948. Über die Konstruktion von Systemen orthogonaler Polynome in einune zwei-dimensionalen Bereichen. Monatsh. Math., 52, 38–54.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, B., Putinar, M., Saff, E. B. and Stylianopoulos, N. 2009. Bergman polynomials on an archipelago: estimates, zeros and shape reconstruction. Adv. Math., 222(4), 1405–1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gustafsson, B. and Putinar, M. 2017. Hyponormal Quantization of Planar Domains: Exponential Transform in Dimension Two. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 2199. Springer, Cham.Google Scholar

Hein, M. and Audibert, J.-Y. 2005. Intrinsic dimensionality estimation of submanifolds in Rd. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning. Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 289–296.Google Scholar

Hein, M., Audibert, J.-Y. and Von Luxburg, U. 2005. From graphs to manifolds–weak and strong pointwise consistency of graph Laplacians. In International Conference on Computational Learning Theory. COLT 2005. Springer, pp. 470–485.Google Scholar

Hellinger, E. 1922. Zur Stieltjesschen Kettenbruchtheorie. Math. Ann., 86(1–2), 18–29.Google Scholar

Hellinger, E. and Toeplitz, O. 1953. Integralgleichungen und Gleichungen mit unendlichvielen Unbekannten. Chelsea, New York, NY.Google Scholar

Henrion, D., Korda, M. and Lasserre, J. B. 2020. The Moment-SOS Hierarchy: Lectures in Probability, Statistics, Computational Geometry and Nonlinear PDEs. World Scientific, Singapore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herglotz, G., Schur, I., Pick, G., Nevanlinna, R. and Weyl, H. 1991. Ausgewählte Arbeiten zu den Ursprüngen der Schur-Analysis. Teubner-Archiv zur Mathematik [Teubner Archive on Mathematics], vol. 16. B. G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Stuttgart. Gewidmet dem großen Mathematiker Issai Schur (1875–1941). [Dedicated to the great mathematician Issai Schur (1875–1941)], Edited and with a foreword and afterword by Bernd Fritzsche and Bernd Kirstein, With contributions by W. Ledermann and W. K. Hayman, With English, French and Russian summaries.Google Scholar

Hilbert, D. 1920. Gaston Darboux. 1842–1917 Acta Math., 42(1), 269–273.Google Scholar

Hilbert, D. 1953. Grundzüge einer allgemeinen Theorie der linearen Integralgleichungen. Chelsea, New York, NY.Google Scholar

Hoaglin, D. C. and Welsch, R. E. 1978. The hat matrix in regression and ANOVA. Amer. Statist., 32(1), 17–22.Google Scholar

Hoel, P. G. 1961/62. Some properties of optimal spacing in polynomial estimation. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math., 13, 1–8.Google Scholar

Hoel, P. G. and Levine, A. 1964. Optimal spacing and weighting in polynomial prediction. Ann. Math. Statist., 35, 1553–1560.Google Scholar

Kiefer, J. 1961. Optimum designs in regression problems. II. Ann. Math. Statist., 32, 298–325.Google Scholar

Kiefer, J. and Wolfowitz, J. 1959. Optimum designs in regression problems. Ann. Math. Statist., 30, 271–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kiefer, J. andWolfowitz, J. 1960. The equivalence of two extremum problems. Canadian J. Math., 12, 363–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kiefer, J. and Wolfowitz, J. 1965. On a theorem of Hoel and Levine on extrapolation designs. Ann. Math. Statist., 36, 1627–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, A. K H. and Zhou, H. H. 2015. Tight minimax rates for manifold estimation under Hausdorff loss. Electron. J. Stat., 9(1), 1562–1582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klimek, M. 1991. Pluripotential Theory. London Mathematical Society Monographs, New Series, vol. 6. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Knill, O. 1998. A remark on quantum dynamics. Helv. Phys. Acta, 71(3), 233–241.Google Scholar

Kolmogorov, A. N. 1941. Stationary sequences in Hilbert’s space. Vestnik Moskovskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Matematika [Moscow Univ. Math. Bull.], 2, 40pp.Google Scholar

Koopman, B. O. 1931. Hamiltonian systems and transformation in Hilbert space. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 17(5), 315–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Koopman, B. O. and Von Neumann, J. 1932. Dynamical systems of continuous spectra. Proc Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 18(3), 255–263.Google Scholar

Koornwinder, T. 1975. Two-variable analogues of the classical orthogonal polynomials. In Theory and Application of Special Functions (Proc. Advanced Sem., Math. Res. Center, Univ. Wisconsin, Madison, Wis., 1975). Academic Press, New York, pp. 435–495.Google Scholar

Korda, M., Putinar, M. and Mezić, I. 2020. Data-driven spectral analysis of the Koopman operator. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 48(2), 599–629.Google Scholar

Krein, M. G. 1957. On a continual analogue of a Christoffel formula from the theory of orthogonal polynomials. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR (N.S.), 113, 970–973.Google Scholar

Krein, M. G. 1951. The ideas of P. L. Čebyšev and A. A. Markov in the theory of limiting values of integrals and their further development. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk (N.S.), 6(4 (44)), 3–120.Google Scholar

Kroó, A. 2015. Christoffel functions on convex and starlike domains in R^d. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 421(1), 718–729.Google Scholar

Kroó, A. and Lubinsky, D. S. 2013a. Christoffel functions and universality in the bulk for multivariate orthogonal polynomials. Canad. J. Math., 65(3), 600–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kroó, A. and Lubinsky, D. S. 2013b. Christoffel functions and universality on the boundary of the ball. Acta Math. Hungar., 140(1–2), 117–133.Google Scholar

Lacey, M. and Terwilleger, E. 2008. A Wiener–Wintner theorem for the Hilbert transform. Ark. Mat., 46(2), 315–336.Google Scholar

Lam, T. Y. 1984. An introduction to real algebra. Rocky Mountain J. Math., 14(4), 767–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lasserre, J. B. 2015. A generalization of Löwner–John’s Ellipsoid theorem. Math. Program. Ser. A, 152(1), 559–591.Google Scholar

Lasserre, J. B. 2019. The Moment–SOS Hierarchy. In Sirakov, B., Ney de Sousa, P. and Viana, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (ICM 2018). World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 3773–3794.Google Scholar

Lasserre, J. B. and Pauwels, E. 2016. Sorting out typicality with the inverse moment matrix SOS polynomial. In Lee, D. D., Sugiyama, M., Luxburg, U. V., Guyon, I. and Garnett, R. (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates, New York, NY, pp. 190–198.Google Scholar

Lasserre, J. B. and Pauwels, E. 2019. The empirical Christoffel function with applications in data analysis. Adv. Comput. Math., 45(3), 1439–1468.Google Scholar

Levin, E. and Lubinsky, D. S. 2015. Christoffel functions, L_p universality, and Paley-Wiener spaces. J. Anal. Math., 125, 243–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levina, E. and Bickel, P. 2004. Maximum likelihood estimation of intrinsic dimension. Advances in neural information processing systems, 17, 777–784.Google Scholar

Lichman, J. 2013. UCI Machine Learning Repository. School of Information and Computer Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA. Available at: http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml.Google Scholar

Liesen, J. and Strakoš, Z. 2013. Krylov Subspace Methods: Principles and Analysis. Numerical Mathematics and Scientific Computation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Lippmann, G., Poincaré, H., Appell, P., Lavisse, E., Volterra, V., Belugou, L., Picard, R E., Lèvy, L., Guichard, C. and Darboux, G. 1912. Le jubilé de M Gaston Darboux. Revue internationale de l’enseignement, 6, 97–125.Google Scholar

Lovell, S. C., Davis, I. W., Arendall III, W. B., De Bakker, P. IW., Word, J.M., Prisant, M. G., Richardson, J. S. and Richardson, D. C. 2003. Structure validation by Cα geometry: φ, ψ and Cβ deviation. Proteins, 50(3), 437–450.Google Scholar

Ma, P., Mahoney, M. W. and Yu, B. 2015. A statistical perspective on algorithmic leveraging. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 16(1), 861–911.Google Scholar

Magnani, A., Lall, S. and Boyd, S. 2005. Tractable fitting with convex polynomials via sum-of-squares. In Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. Curran Associates, New York, NY, pp. 1672–1677.Google Scholar

Mahoney, M. W. 2011. Randomized algorithms for matrices and data. Found. Trends Mach. Learn., 3(2), 123–224.Google Scholar

Mahoney, M. W. and Drineas, P. 2009. CUR matrix decompositions for improved data analysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci USA, 106(3), 697–702.Google Scholar

Mammen, E. and Tsybakov, A. B. 1995. Asymptotical minimax recovery of sets with smooth boundaries. Ann. Statist, 502–524.Google Scholar

Marx, S., Pauwels, E., Weisser, T., Henrion, D. and Lasserre, J. B. 2021. Tractable semi-algebraic approximation using Christoffel–Darboux kernel. Constr. Approx., 54, 391–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Máté, A., Nevai, P. and Totik, V. 1987. Strong and weak convergence of orthogonal polynomials. Amer. J. Math., 109(2), 239–281.Google Scholar

Máté, A., Nevai, P. and Totik, V. 1991. Szegö’s extremum problem on the unit circle. Ann. of Math. (2), 134(2), 433–453.Google Scholar

Matveev, V. B. and Salle, M. A. 1991. Darboux Transformations and Solitons. Springer Series in Nonlinear Dynamics. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar

Mauroy, A., Mezić, I. and Susuki, Yoshihiko. 2020. The Koopman Operator in Systems and Control. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol. 484. Springer, Cham.Google Scholar

Molchanov, I. S. 1998. A limit theorem for solutions of inequalities. Scand. J. Stat., 25(1), 235–242.Google Scholar

Nevai, P. 1986. Géza Freud, orthogonal polynomials and Christoffel functions: A case study. J. Approx. Theory, 48(1), 3–167.Google Scholar

Nie, J. 2013. Certifying convergence of Lasserre’s hierarchy via flat truncation. Math. Program. Ser. A, 142(1–2), 485–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nikolski, N. 2019. Hardy Spaces, French edn. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 179. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Niyogi, P., Smale, S. and Weinberger, S. 2008. Finding the homology of submanifolds with high confidence from random samples. Discrete Comput. Geom., 39(1–3), 419–441.Google Scholar

Niyogi, P., Smale, S. and Weinberger, S. 2011. A topological view of unsupervised learning from noisy data. SIAM J. Comput., 40(3), 646–663.Google Scholar

Paulsen, V. I. and Raghupathi, M. 2016. An Introduction to the Theory of Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 152. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Pauwels, E., Bach, F. and Vert, J.-P. 2018. Relating leverage scores and density using regularized christoffel functions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1663–1672.Google Scholar

Pauwels, E., Putinar, M. and Lasserre, J. B. 2021. Data analysis from empirical moments and the Christoffel function. Found. Comput. Math., 21(1), 243–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pawłucki, W. and Pleśniak, W. 1986. Markov’s inequality and C^∞ functions on sets with polynomial cusps. Math. Ann., 275(3), 467–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peherstorfer, F. 1992. Finite perturbations of orthogonal polynomials. J. Comput. Appl. Math., 44(3), 275–302.Google Scholar

Perryman, M., Lindegren, L., Kovalevsky, J., Hoeg, E., Bastian, U., Bernacca, P. et al. 1997. The Hipparcos Catalogue. Astron. Astrophys., 500, 501–504.Google Scholar

Piazzon, F. 2018. The extremal plurisubharmonic function of the torus. Dolomites Res. Notes Approx., 11(Special Issue Norm Levenberg), 62–72.Google Scholar

Piazzon, F. 2019a. Laplace Beltrami operator in the Baran metric and pluripotential equilibrium measure: the ball, the simplex, and the sphere. Comput. Methods Funct. Theory, 19(4), 547–582.Google Scholar

Piazzon, F. 2019b. Pluripotential numerics. Constr. Approx., 49(2), 227–263.Google Scholar

Poincaré, H. 1975. L’avenir des mathématiques. Scientia (Milano), 110(5-8), 357– 368. Abridged text of a paper read at the Fourth International Congress of Mathematicians, Rome, 1908, with introductions in Italian and English.Google Scholar

Polonik, W. 1995. Measuring mass concentrations and estimating density contour clusters-an excess mass approach. Ann. Statist., 23(3), 855–881.Google Scholar

Prestel, A. and Delzell, C. N. 2001. Positive Polynomials: From Hilbert’s 17th Problem to Real Algebra. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar

Prymak, A. and Usoltseva, O. 2019. Christoffel functions on planar domains with piecewise smooth boundary. Acta Math. Hungar., 158(1), 216–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putinar, M. 1993. Positive polynomials on compact semi-algebraic sets. Indiana Univ. Math. J., 42, 969–984.Google Scholar

Putinar, M. 2021a. Moment estimates of the cloud of a planar measure. Acta Appl. Math., https://doi.org/10.1007/s10440–021-00443-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putinar, M. 2021b. Spectral Analysis of 2D outlier layout. J. Spectral Theory, 11, 821– 845.Google Scholar

Rényi, A. and Sulanke, R. 1963. Über die konvexe Hülle von n zufällig gewählten Punkten. Probab. Theory. Related Fields, 2(1), 75–84.Google Scholar

Ricci, P. E. 1978. Čebyšev polynomials in several variables. Rend. Mat. (6), 11(2), 295–327.Google Scholar

Riesz, F. and Sz.-Nagy, B. 1990 [1955]. Functional Analysis, trans. L. F. Boron. Dover Books on Advanced Mathematics. Dover, New York, NY.Google Scholar

Riesz, M. 2013 [1988]. Collected Papers, ed. Garding, L. and Hörmander, L.. Springer Collected Works in Mathematics. Springer, Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Rodríguez Casal, A. 2007. Set estimation under convexity type assumptions. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat., 43(6), 763–774.Google Scholar

Rosenblum, M. and Rovnyak, J. 1997 [1985]. Hardy Classes and Operator Theory. Dover, Mineola, NY.Google Scholar

Ross, J. and Nyström, D. W. 2019. Applications of the duality between the homogeneous complex Monge-Ampère equation and the Hele-Shaw flow. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble), 69(1), 1–30.Google Scholar

Rudi, A. and Rosasco, L. 2017. Generalization properties of learning with random features. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. NIPS, pp. 3218– 3228.Google Scholar

Rudi, A., Camoriano, R. and Rosasco, L. 2015. Less is more: Nyström computational regularization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. NIPS, pp. 1657–1665.Google Scholar

Sadullaev, A. 1981. Plurisubharmonic measures and capacities on complex manifolds. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk, 36(4(220)), 53–105, 247.Google Scholar

Sadullaev, A. 1982. Estimates of polynomials on analytic sets. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat., 46(3), 524–534, 671.Google Scholar

Sadullaev, A. 1985. Plurisubharmonic functions. In Current Problems in Mathematics: Fundamental Directions, Vol. 8. Itogi Nauki i Tekhniki. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Vsesoyuz. Inst. Nauchn. i Tekhn. Inform., Moscow, pp. 65–113, 274.Google Scholar

Saff, E. B., Stahl, H., Stylianopoulos, N. and Totik, V. 2015. Orthogonal polynomials for area-type measures and image recovery. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 47(3), 2442–2463.Google Scholar

Samsonov, B. F. and Ovcharov, I. N. 1995. The Darboux transformation and nonclassical orthogonal polynomials. Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Fiz., 38(4), 58–65.Google Scholar

Schmüdgen, K. 2017. The Moment Problem. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 277. Springer, Cham.Google Scholar

Schölkopf, B., Smola, A. J., Bach, F. et al. 2002. Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, regularization, Optimization, and Beyond. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Serre, J.-P. 1956. Géométrie algébrique et géométrie analytique. Ann. Inst. Fourier, 6, 1–42.Google Scholar

Siciak, J. 1962. On some extremal functions and their applications in the theory of analytic functions of several complex variables. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 105, 322–357.Google Scholar

Simanek, B. 2012. Weak convergence of CD kernels: a new approach on the circle and real line. J. Approx. Theory, 164(1), 204–209.Google Scholar

Simon, B. 2005a. Orthogonal Polynomials on the Unit Circle. Part 1: Classical Theory. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, vol. 54. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.Google Scholar

Simon, B. 2005b. Orthogonal Polynomials on the Unit Circle. Part 2: Spectral Theory. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, vol. 54. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.Google Scholar

Simon, B. 2008. The Christoffel–Darboux kernel. In Perspectives in Partial Differential Equations, Harmonic Analysis and Applications. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 79. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, pp. 295–335.Google Scholar

Simon, B. 2009. Weak convergence of CD kernels and applications. Duke Math. J., 146(2), 305–330.Google Scholar

Simon, B. 2011. Szegő’s Theorem and its Descendants: Spectral Theory for L² Perturbations of Orthogonal Polynomials.. M. B. Porter Lectures. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Stahl, H. and Totik, V. 1992. General Orthogonal Polynomials. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 43. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Stone, M. H. 1990 [1932]. Linear Transformations in Hilbert Space. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, vol. 15. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.Google Scholar

Suetin, P. K. 1999. Orthogonal Polynomials in Two Variables. Analytical Methods and Special Functions, vol. 3. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Amsterdam. Translated from the 1988 Russian original by E. V. Pankratiev.Google Scholar

Szegő, G. 1975. Orthogonal Polynomials, 4th edn. American Mathematical Society, Colloquium Publications, vol. 23, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.Google Scholar

Thomson, J. E. 1991. Approximation in the mean by polynomials. Ann. of Math. (2), 133(3), 477–507.Google Scholar

Todd, M. J. 2016. Minimum-Volume Ellipsoids: Theory and Algorithms. SIAM, Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Totik, V. 2000. Asymptotics for Christoffel functions for general measures on the real line. J. Anal. Math., 81, 283–303.Google Scholar

Totik, V. 2010. Christoffel functions on curves and domains. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 362, 2053–2087.Google Scholar

Totik, V. 2012. The polynomial inverse image method. In Neamtu, M. and Schumaker, L. (eds.), Approximation Theory XIII: San Antonio 2010. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics, vol. 13. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar

Tsybakov, A. B. 1997. On nonparametric estimation of density level sets. Ann. Statist., 25(3), 948–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Velleman, P. F. and Welsch, R. E. 1981. Efficient computing of regression diagnostics. Amer. Statis., 35(4), 234–242.Google Scholar

Vershynin, R. 2010. Introduction to the non-asymptotic analysis of random matrices. arXiv preprint arXiv:1011.3027.Google Scholar

von Neumann, J. 1932. Zur Operatorenmethode in der klassischen Mechanik. Ann. of Math. (2), 33(3), 587–642.Google Scholar

Vu, Mai Trang, Bachoc, F. and Pauwels, E. 2019. Rate of convergence for geometric inference based on the empirical Christoffel function. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.14458.Google Scholar

Walther, G. 1999. On a generalization of Blaschke’s rolling theorem and the smoothing of surfaces. Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 22(4), 301–316.Google Scholar

Wang, S. and Zhang, Z. 2013. Improving CUR matrix decomposition and the Nyström approximation via adaptive sampling. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 14(1), 2729–2769.Google Scholar

Weisse, A., Wellein, G., Alvermann, A. and Fehske, H. 2006. The kernel polynomial method. Rev. Modern Phys., 78, 275–306.Google Scholar

Widom, H. 1967. Polynomials associated with measures in the complex plane. J. Math. Mech., 16, 997–1013.Google Scholar

Widom, H. 1969. Extremal polynomials associated with a system of curves in the complex plane. Adv. Math., 3, 127–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiener, N. and Wintner, A. 1941. Harmonic analysis and ergodic theory. Amer. J. Math., 63, 415–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, G., Baxter, R., He, H., Hawkins, S. and Gu, L. 2002. A comparative study of RNN for outlier detection in data mining. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. IEEE Computer Society, p. 709.Google Scholar

Xu, Y. 1995. Christoffel functions and Fourier series for multivariate orthogonal polynomials. J. Approx. Theory, 82(2), 205–239.Google Scholar

Xu, Y. 1996. Asymptotics for orthogonal polynomials and Christoffel functions on a ball. Methods Appl. Anal., 3(2), 257–272.Google Scholar

Xu, Y. 1999. Asymptotics of the Christoffel functions on a simplex in R^d. J. Approx. Theory, 99(1), 122–133.Google Scholar

Yamanishi, K., Takeuchi, J.-I., Williams, G. and Milne, P. 2004. On-line supervised outlier detection using finite mixtures with discounting learning algorithms. Data Min. Knowl. Discov., 8(3), 275–300.Google Scholar

Yoon, G. J. 2002. Darboux transforms and orthogonal polynomials. Bull. Korean Math. Soc., 39(3), 359–376.Google Scholar

Zhedanov, A. 1997. Rational spectral transformations and orthogonal polynomials. J. Comput. Appl. Math., 85(1), 67–86.Google Scholar

Zhou, Y. 2016. Asymptotics of L^p Christoffel functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 433(2), 1390–1408.Google Scholar