Further Reading
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 February 2023
Edited by
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Chekhov in Context , pp. 295 - 305Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Primary Sources
Anton Chekhov’s Life and Thought: Selected Letters and Commentary. Trans. Michael Henry Heim and Simon Karlinsky (1973); reprinted, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Bartlett, Rosamund, ed. Anton Chekhov: A Life in Letters. Trans. Rosamund Bartlett and Anthony Phillips. New York: Penguin Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Finke, Michael. Freedom from Violence and Lies: Anton Chekhov’s Life and Writings. London: Reaktion Books, 2021.Google Scholar
McVay, Gordon, ed. and trans. Chekhov: A Life in Letters. London: Folio Society, 1994.Google Scholar
Gregory, Serge. Antosha & Levitasha: The Shared Lives and Art of Anton Chekhov and Isaac Levitan. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Altshuller, I. N. “About Chekhov.” Trans. Eugene Alper. In Finke, Michael and de Sherbinin, Julie (eds.), Chekhov the Immigrant: Translating a Cultural Icon. Bloomington, IN: Slavica, 2007. 337–344.Google Scholar
Coope, John. Doctor Chekhov: A Study in Literature and Medicine. Chale, Isle of Wight: Cross Publishing, 1997.Google Scholar
Finke, Michael. “Heal Thyself, Hide Thyself: Why Did Chekhov Ignore His TB?” In Finke, Michael and de Sherbinin, Julie (eds.), Chekhov the Immigrant: Translating a Cultural Icon. Bloomington, IN: Slavica, 2007. 285–297.Google Scholar
Malcolm, Janet. Reading Chekhov: A Critical Journey. New York: Random House, 2001 (esp. chapter 4).Google Scholar
O’Connor, Katherine T. “Chekhov’s Death: His Textual Past Recaptured.” In Semeka-Pankratov, Elena (ed.), Studies in Poetics, commemorative volume. Krystyna Pomorska (1928–1986). Columbus: Slavica, 1995. 39–50.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Katherine. “Anton Chekhov and D. H. Lawrence: The Art of Letters and the Discourse of Mortality.” In Apollonio, Carol and Lapushin, Radislav (eds.), Chekhov’s Letters: Biography, Context, Poetics. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2018. 220–235.Google Scholar
Rabeneck, Leo. “Chekhov’s Last Moments.” Trans. Harvey Pitcher. The Bulletin of the North American Chekhov Society 13.1 (2005), 1–7; rept. Times Literary Supplement (July 2, 2004).Google Scholar
Confino, Michael. “The Soslovie (Estate) Paradigm: Reflections on Some Open Questions.” Cahiers du Monde russe 49.4, October–December 2008, 681–700.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Sheila. “Ascribing Class: The Construction of Social Identity in Soviet Russia.” The Journal of Modern History 65.4 (1993), 745–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeze, Gregory L. “The Soslovie (Estate) Paradigm and Russian Social History.” The American Historical Review 91.1 (1986), 11–36.Google Scholar
Rieber, Alfred J. “The Sedimentary Society.” Russian History 16.2/4, Festschrift for Leopold H. Haimson (1989), 353–376.Google Scholar
Smith, Alison K. For the Common Good and Their Own Well Being: Social Estates in Imperial Russia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Wirtschafter, Elise Kimerling. Structures of Society: Imperial Russia’s “People of Various Ranks.” DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Anan’ich, Boris V. “The Russian Economy and Banking System.” In Lieven, Dominic (ed.), The Cambridge History of Russia, vol. 2, Imperial Russia 1689–1917. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 384–426.Google Scholar
Antonov, Sergei. Bankrupts and Usurers of Imperial Russia: Debt, Property, and the Law in the Age of Tolstoy and Dostoevsky. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Senelick, Laurence. “Money in Chekhov’s Plays.” Studies in Theatre and Performance 29.3 (2009), 327–337.Google Scholar
Todd, William Mills III. “The Ruse of the Russian Novel.” In Moretti, Franco (ed.), The Novel, vol. 1, History, Geography, Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006. 402–423.Google Scholar
Florinsky, Michael T. Russia: A History and an Interpretation, 2 vols. New York: Macmillan, 1953.Google Scholar
Offord, Derek. Nineteenth-Century Russia: Opposition to Autocracy. Harlow: Pearson, 1999.Google Scholar
Offord, Derek. The Russian Revolutionary Movement in the 1880s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Stephen P. Crime, Cultural Conflict, and Justice in Rural Russia, 1856–1914. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Frierson, Cathy A. Peasant Icons: Representations of Rural People in Late Nineteenth-Century Russia. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Gaudin, Corinne. Ruling Peasants: Village and State in Late Imperial Russia. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Moon, David. The Russian Peasantry, 1600–1930: The World the Peasants Made. London: Longman, 1999.Google Scholar
Worobec, Christine D. Peasant Russia: Family and Community in the Post-Emancipation Period. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Clements, Barbara Evans. A History of Women in Russia: From Earliest Times to the Present. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Engel, Barbara Alpern. Women in Russia, 1700–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Engelstein, Laura. The Keys to Happiness: Sex and the Search for Modernity in Fin-de-siècle Russia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Stites, Richard. The Women’s Liberation Movement in Russia: Feminism, Nihilism, and Bolshevism, 1860–1930. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Miller, Melissa. “Chekhov and Zola’s Naturalism.” The Russian Review 79.2 (2020), 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Melissa. “Какая роскошь! Darwin as Artist in Chekhov’s Fiction.” The Russian Review 77.3 (2018), 378–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Melissa. “‘The Name-Day Party’: Reconceiving Childbirth in Chekhov and Tolstoy.” The Slavic and East European Journal 61.4 (2017), 737–754.Google Scholar
Moeller, Peter Ulf. “Cechov in the Debate on Sexual Morality.” In Postlude to the Kreutzer Sonata: Tolstoy and the Debate on Sexual Morality in Russian Literature in the 1890s. Trans. John Kendal. New York: E. J. Brill, 1988. 235–258.Google Scholar
Costlow, Jane. Heart-Pine Russia: Walking and Writing the Nineteenth-Century Forest. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Miller, Melissa. “Seeing Oil.” In Evtuhov, Catherine and Moon, David (eds.), Environment as History in Russia and the Soviet Union. New York: Berghahn, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Moon, David. “The Debate over Climate Change in the Steppe Region in Nineteenth-Century Russia.” The Russian Review 69.2 (2010), 251–275.Google Scholar
Nelson, Amy. “The Body of the Beast: Animal Protection and Anticruelty Legislation in Imperial Russia.” In Costlow, Jane and Nelson, Amy (eds.), Other Animals: Beyond the Human in Russian Culture and History. Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press, 2010. 95–112.Google Scholar
Newlin, Tom. “At the Bottom of the River: Forms of Ecological Consciousness in Mid-Nineteenth Century Russian Literature.” Russian Studies in Literature 39.2 (2003), 71–90.Google Scholar
Novosad, Elena. “Zagriaznenie Volgi neft’iu.” Voprosy istorii estestvoznaniia i tekhniki 1 (2006), 61–72.Google Scholar
Beer, Daniel. The House of the Dead: Siberian Exile Under the Tsars, Chapter 10. New York: Vintage, 2019.Google Scholar
Conrad, Joseph. “Chekhov as Social Observer: The Island of Sakhalin.” In Clyman, Toby W. (ed.), A Chekhov Companion. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1985. 273–290.Google Scholar
Gentes, Andrew. “Sakhalin as Cause Célèbre: The Re-signification of Russia’s Penal Colony.” Acta Slavica Iaponica 32 (2012), 55–72.Google Scholar
Popkin, Cathy. “Chekhov as Ethnographer: Epistemological Crisis on Sakhalin.” Slavic Review 51.1 (1992), 36–51.Google Scholar
Valenčius, Conevery Bolton. “Chekhov’s Sakhalin Island as Medical Geography.” In Finke, Michael and de Sherbinin, Julie (eds.), Chekhov the Immigrant: Translating the Cultural Icon. Bloomington: Slavica, 2007. 299–314.Google Scholar
Bykova, Marina F., ed. “Tolstoy and Chekhov: Philosophy Invested in Literature.” Special issue of Russian Studies in Philosophy 50.2 (2011).Google Scholar
Shestov, Lev. Chekhov and Other Essays. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Tabachnikova, Olga, ed. Anton Chekhov Through the Eyes of Russian Thinkers: Vasili Rozanov, Dmitrii Merezhkovskii and Lev Shestov. London: Anthem Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Corrigan, Yuri. “Chekhov and the Divided Self.” The Russian Review 70.2 (2011), 272–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Sherbinin, Julie. Chekhov and Russian Religious Culture. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Kataev, Vladimir, Kluge, Rolf-Dieter, and Nohejl, Regine, eds. Anton P. Čechov: Philosophische und Religiöse Dimensionen im Leben und im Werk. Munich: Verlag Otto Sagner, 1997.Google Scholar
McVay, Gordon. “Anton Chekhov: The Unbelieving Believer.” Slavonic and East European Review 80.1 (January 2002), 63–104.Google Scholar
Swift, Mark Stanley. Biblical Subtexts and Religious Themes in Works of Anton Chekhov. New York: Peter Lang, 2004.Google Scholar
Klapuri, Tintti. Chronotopes of Modernity in Chekhov. Berlin: Peter Lang, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vucinich, Alexander. Science in Russian Culture. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Beer, Daniel. Renovating Russia: the Human Sciences and the Fate of Liberal Modernity. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Engelstein, Laura. Keys to Happiness: Sex and the Search for Modernity in Fin-de-Siècle Russia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Finke, Michael. Seeing Chekhov: Life and Art. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frieden, Nancy Mandelker. Russian Physicians in an Era of Reform and Revolution, 1856–1905. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joravsky, David. Russian Psychology: A Critical History. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar
Gregory, Serge. Antosha & Levitasha: The Shared Lives and Art of Anton Chekhov and Isaac Levitan. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Haldey, Olga. Mamontov’s Private Opera: The Search for Modernism in Russian Theater. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
King, Averil. Isaak Levitan: Lyrical Landscape. Suffolk: Antique Collectors’ Club, 2011.Google Scholar
Valkenier, Elizabeth. Russian Realist Art: The Peredvizhniki and Their Tradition. Ann Arbor: Ardis, 1977.Google Scholar
Brooks, Jeffrey. The Firebird and the Fox: Russian Culture under Tsars and Bolsheviks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019 (esp. Chapter 4).Google Scholar
Figes, Orlando. Natasha’s Dance: A Cultural History of Russia. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2002 (esp. Chapters 3 and 5).Google Scholar
Matich, Olga. Erotic Utopia: The Decadent Imagination in Russia’s Fin de Siècle. Madison, University of Wisconsin Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Geifman, Anna. Thou Shalt Kill: Revolutionary Terrorism in Russia, 1894–1917. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Shatz, Marshall S., and Zimmerman, Judith E., eds. and trans. Signposts: A Collection of Articles on the Russian Intelligentsia. Irvine: Charles Schlacks, 1986.Google Scholar
Stepniak, Sergei. Underground Russia: Revolutionary Profiles and Sketches from Life, 2nd ed. New York: Scribner’s, 1888.Google Scholar
Charle, Christophe. Birth of the Intellectuals, 1880–1900. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Evdokimova, Svetlana. “Russian Binaries and the Question of Culture: Chekhov’s True Intelligent.” In Apollonio, Carol and Lapushin, Radislav (eds.), Chekhov’s Letters: Biography, Context, Poetics. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2018. 173–192.Google Scholar
Morson, Gary Saul. “The Intelligentsia and Its Critics.” In Gleason, Abbott (ed.), A Companion to Russian History. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. 261–278.Google Scholar
Pipes, Richard, ed. The Russian Intelligentsia. New York: Columbia University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Brooks, Jeffrey. When Russia Learned to Read: Literacy and Popular Literature, 1861–1917. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Dinershtein, E. A. A. S. Suvorin: chelovek, sdelavshii kareru. Moscow: Rossiiskaia politentsiklopediia, 1998.Google Scholar
McReynolds, Louise. The News under Russia’s Old Regime: The Development of the Mass-Circulation Press. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Ruud, Charles A. Russian Entrepreneur: Publisher Ivan Sytin of Moscow 1851–1934. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Bartlett, Rosamund. “Tolstoy’s Fiction: Its Spiritual Legacy.” In Cicovacki, Predrag and Grek, Heidi Nada (eds.), Tolstoy and Spirituality. Boston: Academic Studies Press, 2018. 20–25.Google Scholar
Bykova, Marina F. “Editor’s Introduction – Tolstoy and Chekhov: Philosophy Invested in Literature.” Russian Studies in Philosophy 50.2 (2011), 3–7.Google Scholar
Emerson, Caryl. The Cambridge Introduction to Russian Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Lakshin, Vladimir. Tolstoi i Chekhov, 2 vol. ed. Moscow: Moskovskie uchebniki, [1963] 2009.Google Scholar
Mangold, Matthew. “Space and Storytelling in Late Imperial Russia: Tolstoy, Chekhov, and the Question of Property.” Russian Review 76 (January 2017), 72–94.Google Scholar
Melkov, A. S. ed. L. N. Tolstoi i A. P. Chekhov. Rasskazyvayut sovremenniki, arkhivy, muzei … Moscow: Nasledie, 1998.Google Scholar
Opul’skaya, L. D., Papernyi, Z. S., and Shatalov, S. E., eds. Chekhov i Lev Tolstoi. Moscow: Nauka, 1980.Google Scholar
Rayfield, Donald. Understanding Chekhov: A Critical Study of Chekhov’s Prose and Drama. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Winner, Thomas. “Čexov’s ‘Ward No. 6’ and Tolstoyan Ethics.” Slavic and East European Journal 3.4 (1959), 321–334.Google Scholar
Bonamour, J., Kataev, V. B., Kniazhevskaia, T. B., and Lakshin, V. I., eds. Chekhoviana: Chekhov I Frantsiia/Tchékohviana: Tchékhov et la France. Moscow: Nauka and Institut d’études slaves, 1992.Google Scholar
Kataev, V. B. Chekhov plius. Predshestvenniki, sovremenniki, preemniki. Moscow: Yazyki slavianskoi kul’tury, 2004.Google Scholar
Miller, Melissa. “Chekhov and Zola’s Naturalism.” Russian Review 79.2 (2020), 293–308.Google Scholar
Rukalski, Z. “Maupassant and Chekhov: Differences.” Canadian Slavonic Papers 13.4 (1971), 374–402.Google Scholar
Corrigan, Yuri. “Chekhov on the Meaning of Life: After Romanticism and Nihilism.” In Chao, Shun-Liang and Corrigan, John Michael (eds.), Romantic Legacies: Transnational and Transdisciplinary Contexts (Routledge Studies in Comparative Literature). New York: Routledge, 2019. 67–82.Google Scholar
Green, Michael. The Russian Symbolist Theatre: An Anthology of Plays and Critical Texts. Ann Arbor: Ardis Publishers, 1986.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert Louis, ed. Chekhov: A Collection of Critical Essays. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1967.Google Scholar
Shcherbenok, Andrey. “‘Killing Realism’: Insight and Meaning in Anton Chekhov.” Slavic and East European Journal 54.2 (2010), 297–316.Google Scholar
Tabachnikova, Olga, ed. Anton Chekhov through the Eyes of Russian Thinkers: Vasili Rozanov, Dmitrii Merezhkovskii and Lev Shestov. London: Anthem Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Muza, Anna. “The Marriage of Figaro, the Marriage of Lopakhin: The Hero’s Revolt.” In Apollonio, Carol and Brintlinger, Angela (eds.), Chekhov for the 21st Century. Bloomington: Slavica Publishers, 2012. 167–179.Google Scholar
Senelick, Laurence. “Offenbach and Chekhov; or, La Belle Elena.” In Jackson, R. L. (ed.), Reading Chekhov’s Text. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1993. 201–213.Google Scholar
Senelick, Laurence. The Chekhov Theatre: A Century of the Plays in Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Winner, Thomas G. “Chekhov’s Seagull and Shakespeare’s Hamlet: A Study of a Dramatic Device.” American Slavic and East European Review 15.1 (1956), 103–111.Google Scholar
Brustein, Robert. The Theatre of Revolt: Studies in Modern Drama from Ibsen to Genet, rev. ed. Chicago: Elephant Paperbacks, Ivan R. Dee Publisher, [1962] 1991.Google Scholar
Gilman, Richard. The Making of Modern Drama, rev. ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, [1972] 1999.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, Vera, and Allain, Paul, eds. The Cambridge Companion to Chekhov. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Schumacher, Claude, ed. Naturalism and Symbolism in European Theatre, 1850–1918. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Senelick, Laurence. The Chekhov Theatre: A Century of the Plays in Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Balukhatyi [sic], S. D., ed. The Seagull Produced by Stanislavsky. Trans. David Magarshack. London: Methuen, 1952.Google Scholar
Carnicke, Sharon Marie. Stanislavsky in Focus: An Acting Master for the Twenty-First Century, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar
Dalos, György, with the collaboration of Andrea Dunai. The Guest from the Future: Anna Akhmatova and Isaiah Berlin. Trans. Anthony Wood. London: John Murray, 1998.Google Scholar
Durkin, Andrew. “Trifonov’s ‘Taking Stock’: The Role of Čexovian Subtext.” Slavic and East European Journal 28.1 (1984), 32–41.Google Scholar
Grinberg, Marat. “Hesped: Five Years Later” [on Friedrich Gorenstein’s Essays]. Slovo/Word 54 (2007), 49–60.Google Scholar
Parts, Lyudmila. The Chekhovian Intertext: Dialogue with a Classic. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Tabachnikova, Olga. “‘The world is ugly and people are sad’: On Chekhov’s Ethics and Aesthetics in the Works of Sergei Dovlatov.” In Andrew, Joe and Reid, Robert (eds.), Essays in Poetics, vol. 2. Chekhov and Others. Keele, UK: Keele Students Union Press, 2006. 319–354.Google Scholar
Allen, David. “Chekhov in England.” In Allen, David (ed.) Performing Chekhov. London: Routledge, 2000. 161–214.Google Scholar
Arboleda, D. Augusto. “British Chekhov: An Analysis of rhe United Kingdom’s 21st Century National Identity through Contemporary Reinterpretations of Anton Chekhov’s Plays.” PhD thesis, University of Roehampton, 2017.Google Scholar
Miles, Patrick, ed. Chekhov on the British Stage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Clayton, J. Douglas, ed. Chekhov Then and Now: The Reception of Chekhov in World Culture. New York: Peter Lang, 1997.Google Scholar
Meister, Charles W. “Chekhov’s Reception in England and America.” The American Slavic and East European Review 12.1 (1953), 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senelick, Laurence, ed. Wandering Stars, Russian Émigré Theatre:1905–1940. Iowa City, Iowa University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Cho, Heekyoung. “Rethinking World Literature through the Relations between Russian and East Asian Literatures.” Cross-Currents: East Asian History and Culture Review 28 (2018), 7–26. https://cross-currents.berkeley.edu/e-journal/issue-28/cho (accessed October 16, 2018).Google Scholar
Cho, Heekyoung. Translation’s Forgotten History: Russian Literature, Japanese Mediation, and the Formation of Modern Korean Literature. Cambridge: Harvard University Asia Center, 2016.Google Scholar
Clayton, J. Douglas, ed. Chekhov Then and Now: The Reception of Chekhov in World Culture. New York: Peter Lang, 1997.Google Scholar
Gamsa, Mark. The Reading of Russian Literature in China: A Moral Example and Manual of Practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Google Scholar
Konishi, Sho. Anarchist Modernity: Cooperatism and Japanese-Russian Intellectual Relations in Modern Japan. Cambridge: Harvard University Asia Center, 2013.Google Scholar
Burry, Alexander. “From Prison to Paradise: Michael Blakemore’s Transposition of Uncle Vanya.” Literature/Film Quarterly 38.2 (2010), 84–97.Google Scholar
Deblasio, Alyssa. “Ivan Dykhovichny’s The Black Monk (1988): Madness, Chekhov, and the Chimera of Idleness.” In The Filmmaker’s Philosopher: Merab Mamardashvili and Russian Cinema. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2019. 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKay, John and Safarianitis, Rita. “Chekhov on Screen: Lady with the Dog (1960) and Vanya on 42nd Street (1994).” In Finke, Michael C. and Holquist, Michael (eds.), Approaches to Teaching the Works of Anton Chekhov. New York: The Modern Language Association of America, 2016. 124–140.Google Scholar
Meerzon, Yana. “Interrogating the Real: Chekhov’s Cinema of Verbatim. Ward Number Six in Karen Shakhnazarov’s 2009 Film Adaptation.” In Clayton, J. Douglas and Meerzon, Yana (eds.), Adapting Chekhov: The Text and its Mutations. New York: Routledge, 2013. 274–294.Google Scholar
Palmer, James. “Mastering Chekhov: Heifitz’s The Lady with the Dog.” Literature/Film Quarterly 19.4 (1991), 252–257.Google Scholar
Stam, Robert. “Introduction: The Theory and Practice of Adaptation.” In Stam, Robert and Raengo, Alessandra (eds.), Literature and Film: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Film Adaptation. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 2005. 1–52.Google Scholar
Beasley, Rebecca. Russomania: Russian Culture and the Creation of British Modernism, 1881–1922. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Chekhov, Anton. Anton Chekhov’s Selected Stories. Ed. Popkin, Cathy. NY: Norton, 2014.Google Scholar
Chukovsky, K. I. The Art of Translation: Kornei Chukovsky’s “A High Art.” Trans. and ed. Leighton, Lauren G.. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Leighton, Lauren G. Two Worlds, One Art: Literary Translation in Russia and America. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
May, Rachel. The Translator in the Text: On Reading Russian Literature in English. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
McAteer, Catherine. Translating Great Russian Literature: The Penguin Russian Classics, forthcoming. Baltimore: Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar
Rayfield, Donald. “Chekhov.” In France, Peter (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Literature in English Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. 598–601.Google Scholar