Book contents
- Rights Claiming in South Korea
- Rights Claiming in South Korea
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction Rights in Action
- Part I Rights in Historical Perspective
- Part II Institutional Mechanisms for Rights Claiming
- 4 A Clash of Claims
- 5 Advancing Human Rights, Advancing a Nation
- 6 The Constitutional Court as a Facilitator of Fundamental Rights Claiming in South Korea, 1988–2018
- 7 Rights Claiming through the Courts
- 8 Public Interest Lawyering in South Korea
- Part III Mobilizing Rights for the Marginalized
- Part IV Shaping Rights for New Citizens and Noncitizens
- Conclusion Findings and Future Directions
- Index
- References
6 - The Constitutional Court as a Facilitator of Fundamental Rights Claiming in South Korea, 1988–2018
from Part II - Institutional Mechanisms for Rights Claiming
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 April 2021
Book contents
- Rights Claiming in South Korea
- Rights Claiming in South Korea
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction Rights in Action
- Part I Rights in Historical Perspective
- Part II Institutional Mechanisms for Rights Claiming
- 4 A Clash of Claims
- 5 Advancing Human Rights, Advancing a Nation
- 6 The Constitutional Court as a Facilitator of Fundamental Rights Claiming in South Korea, 1988–2018
- 7 Rights Claiming through the Courts
- 8 Public Interest Lawyering in South Korea
- Part III Mobilizing Rights for the Marginalized
- Part IV Shaping Rights for New Citizens and Noncitizens
- Conclusion Findings and Future Directions
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter investigates how South Korean citizens’ petitioning to redress grievances against the state and constitutional adjudication have developed since the end of the 1980s. While de jure there existed a constitutional review system since the founding of the Republic in 1948, it was only after transition to formal democracy that infringement on fundamental rights could be de facto appealed in the Constitutional Court, which was established in 1988. Through an analysis of caseload statistics from the Constitutional Court, the chapter explores how citizens have been making use of the constitutional appeal system for claiming their rights. The study also qualitatively examines shifts in the logic and outcomes of constitutional adjudication of fundamental rights claims concerning major social issues such as gender equality, sexual autonomy, and freedom of conscience.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Rights Claiming in South Korea , pp. 126 - 150Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Blankenburg, Erhard. 1998. “Die Verfassungsbeschwerde: Nebenbühne der Politik und Klagemauer von Bürgern.” Kritische Justiz 31: 203–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Dai-Kwon. 2008. “Minjujuuiwa beopchijuui; heonbeopjaepanui jeongchihak” [Democracy and the rule of law: The politics of constitutional adjudication]. Heonbeop nonchong 19: 177–223.Google Scholar
Choi, Dai-Kwon 2014. “The State of Fundamental Rights Protection in Korea.” In Current Issues in Korean Law, edited by Mayali, Laurent and Yoo, John, 87–124. Berkeley: Robbins Collection Publications.Google Scholar
Choi, Hee-Kyoung. 2012. “Heonbeopgwa jendeoe gwanhan gochal” [A study on the constitution and gender]. Ewha Law Journal 17 (2): 1–31.Google Scholar
Constitutional Court of Korea. 1998. Heonbeopjaepanso 10-nyeonsa [Ten years Constitutional Court]. Seoul: Constitutional Court of Korea.Google Scholar
Constitutional Court of Korea 2008. Heonbeopjaepanso 20-nyeonsa [Twenty years Constitutional Court]. Seoul: Constitutional Court of Korea.Google Scholar
Constitutional Court of Korea 2015. “‘Saeropda, haegyeolhada, gungmineul wihada’, bigdeiteo bunseogkeul tonghae bon heonbeopjaepanso 27-nyeon” [“Fresh, to solve, for the people,” looking into 27 years of the Constitutional Court through big data analysis]. www.ccourt.go.kr/cckhome/kor/ccourt/pressrelease/selectPressrelease.do?searchClassSeq=220.Google Scholar
Dannemann, Gerhard. 1994. “Constitutional Complaints: The European Perspective.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 43: 142–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry, and Morlino, Leonardo. 2004. “The Quality of Democracy. An Overview.” Journal of Democracy 15 (4): 20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunham, Will. 2011. “Obama Hails end of U.S. Military Restrictions on Gays.” Reuters, September 20, 2011. www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-gays-military-idUSTRE78J3WP20110920.Google Scholar
Gallup. 2016. “Naktae gwallyeon insik” [Perceptions regarding abortion]. Gallup, October 20, 2016. www.gallup.co.kr/gallupdb/reportContent.asp?seqNo=784.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. 2003a. Judicial Review in New Democracies. Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. 2003b. “Rule by Law or Rule of Law?” In Judicial Review in New Democracies, edited by Ginsburg, Tom, 206–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. 2009. “The Constitutional Court and Judicialization of Korean Politics.” In New Courts in Asia, edited by Hardin, Andrew and Nicholson, Penelope, 145–57. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gukhoesamucheo. 1960. “Heonbeopgaejeongan gichowiwonhoe sokgirok” [Minutes of the Constitutional Amendment Bill Committee]. May 4, 1960.Google Scholar
Häberle, Peter. 2014. Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit – Verfassungsprozessrecht. Ausgewählte Beiträge aus vier Jahrzehnten. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2017. “South Korea. Events of 2017,” Human Rights Watch, www.hrw.org/world-report/2018/country-chapters/south-korea.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Im, Sun-hyeon. 2017. “Bulgisocheobun chwisohaedalla … heonbeopsoweon haemada 300-geon isang” [More than 300 cases filed for requesting the cancelation non-indictment by prosecution]. Yonhap, October 12, 2008. www.yonhapnews.co.kr/bulletin/2017/10/12/0200000000AKR20171012113200004.HTML.Google Scholar
Jeon, Jeong-hyun. 2016. “Political Functions and Dilemma of the Korean Constitutional Court.” Korea Observer 47(3): 461–492.Google Scholar
Joongang Ilbo. 2018. “Naktaejoe pyeji, sahoejeok nonui sijakhaja” [Let’s start talking about the abolition of the crime of abortion]. Joongang Ilbo, May 25, 2018, https://news.joins.com/article/22654181 (accessed January 2, 2019).Google Scholar
Kim, Jongcheol. 2005. “Heonbeopjaepanso guseongbangbeopui gaehyeongnon” [Reform proposal for the Constitutional Court’s constitution method]. Heonbeophak Yeongu 11 (2): 9–48.Google Scholar
Kim, Jongcheol 2010. “The Structure and Basic Principles of Constitutional Adjudication in the Republic of Korea.” In Litigation in Korea, edited by Kuk, Cho, 114–34. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Kim, Sang-cheol. 1988. “Heonbeopjaepanui hwalseonghwabangan (ojeontoronyoji)” [Activation proposals for constitutional adjudication (morning discussion)]. SNU Beophak 29 (3/4): 46–59.Google Scholar
Kim, Seung-dae. 2017. “Gibongwonui pyeoncheon” [The evolution of fundamental rights]. Hyeondaesagwangjang 9: 62–81.Google Scholar
Kranenpohl, Uwe. 2004. “Funktionen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts. Eine politikwissenschaftliche Analyse.” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, B 50–51: 39–46.Google Scholar
Lee, Kang-kook. 2014. “The Past and Future of Constitutional Adjudication in Korea.” In Current Issues in Korean Law, edited by Mayali, Laurent and Yoo, John, 1–13. Berkeley: Robbins Collection Publications.Google Scholar
Legislation and Judiciary Committee, Chairperson of the 2013. Beopjesabeopwiwonhoe Hoeuirok [Minutes of the Legislation and Judiciary Committee], 5th meeting, March 4, 2013. http://likms.assembly.go.kr.Google Scholar
Morlino, Leonardo. 2010. “The Two ‘Rules of Law’ between Transition to a Quality of Democracy.” In Rule of Law and Democracy, edited by Morlino, Leonardo, and Palombella, Gianluigi, 39–63. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Mosler, Hannes B. 2014. “Judicialization of Politics and the Korean Constitutional Court: the Party Chapter Abolition Case.” Verfassung und Recht in Übersee, Heft 3: 293–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosler, Hannes B. 2015. “Legal Translations ‘Made in Korea’.” In Lost and Found in Translation, edited by Lee, Eun-Jeung and Mosler, Hannes B., 115–64. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Mosler, Hannes B. 2016. “Das Verbot der Vereinten Progressiven Partei in der Republik Korea.” Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen (ZParl) 47 (1): 176–94.Google Scholar
Mosler, Hannes B. 2017a. “Deutsch-koreanische Geschichte im Licht verfassungsrechtlicher Übersetzungen.” In Facetten deutsch-koreanischer Beziehungen – 130 Jahre gemeinsame Geschichte, edited by Lee, Eun-Jeung and Mosler, Hannes B., 57–92. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Mosler, Hannes B. 2017b. “The Institution of Presidential Impeachment in South Korea, 1992–2017.” Verfassung und Recht in Übersee, Heft 2: 111–34.Google Scholar
Mosler, Hannes B. 2018. “Democratic Quality and the Rule of Law in South Korea: The Case of the Prosecution.” In The Quality of Democracy in Korea: Three Decades after Democratization, edited byHannes Mosler, et al., 73–120. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nam, Puk-hyeon. 2003. “Beomnyului ipbeopgwajeong siljewa heonbeopjaepansoe uihan wiheonyeobu gyeoljeongui sanggwangwangye” [The correlation between the legislation process and unconstitutionality decisions by the Constitutional Court]. Law and Society 24: 213–55.Google Scholar
Naumann, Kolja. 2010. “Die verfassungsgerichtliche Entwicklung des Grundrechtschutzes in der Republik Korea.” Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart 58: 685–712.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo. 2004. “Why the Rule of Law Matters.” Journal of Democracy 15 (4): 32–46.Google Scholar
Seo, Ki-seok. 2014. “Heonbeopjaepanui uiuiwa yeokhal” [The meaning and role of constitutional review]. Beobyeon 43: 62–67.Google Scholar
Seoul Sinmun. 2018. “Heonjae, naktaejoeui hyeonsiljeok goeri jiksihaeya” [The Constitutional Court has to face the discrepancy between criminalizing abortion and reality]. Seoul Sinmun, May 25, 2019. www.seoul.co.kr/news/newsView.php?id=20180525031025&wlog_tag3=naver.Google Scholar
Shin, Woo Cheol. 2011. “Uri heonbeopsaeseo ‘gibongwon’ui uimi” [The meaning of “fundamental rights” in Korean constitutional history]. Yeoksa Bipyeong 96: 61–108.Google Scholar
Song, Ki-Choon. 2001. “Heonbeopjaepanso simpansageonnugyepyoe natanan beobweonui heonbeoppandanui sujunbunseok” [An analysis of the Constitutional Court’s decisions based on the court’s caseload statistics]. Public Law 29 (4): 243–63.Google Scholar
Song, Ki-Choon 2005. “Heonbeopjaepanso simpansageon tonggyebunseok” [A time series analysis of the case statistics of the Constitutional Court of Korea]. Public Law 34 (2): 83–115.Google Scholar
West, James M., and Yoon, Dae-Kyu. 1992. “The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Korea: Transforming the Jurisprudence of the Vortex?” The American Journal of Contemporary Law 40 (1): 73–119.Google Scholar
Yang, Hyunah. 2013. “Colonialism and Patriarchy: Where the Korean Family-Head (hoju) System Had Been Located.” In Law and Society in Korea, edited by Yang, Hyunah, 45–63. Northampton: Elgar.Google Scholar
Yeh, Jiunn-Rong. 2009. “The Emergence of Asian Constitutionalism: Features in Comparison.” NTU Law Review 4 (3): 39–53.Google Scholar
Yeh, Jiunn-Rong, and Chang, Wen-Chen. 2011. “The Emergence of East Asian Constitutionalism: Features in Comparison.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 59 (3): 805–39.Google Scholar
Yeo, Hyeon-ho. 2018. “Heonjaeseo 6-nyeonmane beoreojin ‘naktaejoe’ gyeongnon … hapheon gyeoljeong bakkwil ganeungseong” [After six years heated debate at the Constitutional Court again on the ‘crime of abortion’, possibilities of change of decision]. Hankyoreh Sinmun, May 24, 2018. www.hani.co.kr/arti/society/society_general/846123.html.Google Scholar
Yi, Eseudeo. 2018. “Yeogabu, ‘naktaejoe pyejihaeya’ heonjaee uigyeon jechul, jeongbu bucheo cheoeum” [MGE submits ‘abolish abortion crime’ to Constitutional Court, first government agency to do so]. Joongang Ilbo, May 23, 2018. https://news.joins.com/article/22645945.Google Scholar