Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T16:42:00.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Internal Flame Processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2021

Tim C. Lieuwen
Tim C. Lieuwen
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology
Get access

Summary

Chapter 8 considered ignition, and the processes associated with autoignition and forced ignition of a nonreactive mixture. In this chapter we focus on premixed and nonpremixed flames and the key physics controlling burning rates and extinction processes. Section 9.1 summarizes basic issues associated with the structure and burning rate of steady, premixed flames in homogeneous, one-dimensional flow fields. This includes discussions of the effects of pressure, temperature, and stoichiometry on burning rates. Section 9.2 then discusses how these results are modified by inhomogeneities in mixture composition, and the competition between autoignition waves and deflagration waves. Section 9.3 discusses how these one-dimensional characteristics are altered by inhomogeneities in the flow field relative to the flame, referred to as flame stretch. We then discuss how these lead to changes in burning rate and, for large enough levels of stretch, cause the flame to extinguish. Section 9.4 treats the effects of unsteadiness in pressure, fuel/air ratio, and stretch rate. Specifically, we discuss how the flame acts as a low-pass filter to disturbances in most cases, and that its sensitivity to disturbances diminishes with increasing frequency. These results have important implications for many combustion instability phenomena, where the flame is perturbed by time-varying flow and composition variations.

Type
Chapter
Information
Unsteady Combustor Physics , pp. 321 - 378
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Neophytou, A., Mastorakos, E., and Cant, R., DNS of spark ignition and edge flame propagation in turbulent droplet-laden mixing layers. Combustion and Flame, 2010, 157(6): pp. 1071–1086.Google Scholar
Law, C.K., Combustion Physics. 2006, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turns, S.R., An Introduction to Combustion: Concepts and Applications. 2nd ed. 2001, MacGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Glassman, I. and Yetter, R.A., Combustion. 4th ed. 2008, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Smith, G.P., Golden, D.M., Frenklach, M., Moriarty, N.W., Eiteneer, B., Goldenberg, M., Bowman, T., Hanson, R.K., Song, S., Gardiner, W.C.J., Lissianski, V.V., and Qin, Z., GRI-Mech. Available from: http://combustion.berkeley.edu/gri-mech/.Google Scholar
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (Combustion Research), Chemical-Kinetic Mechanisms for Combustion Applications, San Diego Mechanism web page 2012. Available from: https://web.eng.ucsd.edu/mae/groups/combustion/mechanism.html/.Google Scholar
Davis, S.G., Joshi, A.V., Wang, H., and Egolfopoulos, F., An optimized kinetic model of H2/CO combustion. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2005, 30(1): pp. 1283–1292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, W., de Vries, J., Krejci, M., Petersen, E., Serinyel, Z., Metcalfe, W., Curran, H., and Bourque, G., Laminar flame speed measurements and modeling of pure alkanes and alkane blends at elevated pressures. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2011, 133: p. 091501.Google Scholar
Kochar, Y.N., Vaden, S.N., Lieuwen, T.C., and Seitzman, J.M., Laminar flame speed of hydrocarbon fuels with preheat and low oxygen content, in 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vagelopoulos, C., Egolfopoulos, F., and Law, C., Further considerations on the determination of laminar flame speeds with the counterflow twin-flame technique. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1994, 25(1): pp. 1341–1347.Google Scholar
Vagelopoulos, C.M. and Egolfopoulos, F.N., Direct experimental determination of laminar flame speeds, Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1998, 27(1): pp. 513–519.Google Scholar
Smallbone, A., Liu, W., Law, C., You, X., and Wang, H., Experimental and modeling study of laminar flame speed and non-premixed counterflow ignition of n-heptane. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2009, 32(1): pp. 1245–1252.Google Scholar
Dowdy, D.R., Smith, D.B., Taylor, S.C., and Williams, A., The use of expanding spherical flames to determine burning velocities and stretch effects in hydrogen/air mixtures. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1991, 23(1): pp. 325–332.Google Scholar
McLean, I.C., Smith, D.B., and Taylor, S.C., The use of carbon monoxide/hydrogen burning velocities to examine the rate of the CO + OH reaction. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1994, 25(1): pp. 749–757.Google Scholar
Qiao, L., Kim, C., and Faeth, G., Suppression effects of diluents on laminar premixed hydrogen/oxygen/nitrogen flames. Combustion and Flame, 2005, 143(1–2): pp. 79–96.Google Scholar
Amato, A., Hudak, B., D’Carlo, P., Noble, D., Scarborough, D., Seitzman, J., and Lieuwen, T., Methane oxycombustion for low CO2 cycles: Blowoff measurements and analysis. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2011, 133: p. 061503-1.Google Scholar
Burke, M.P., Chaos, M., Dryer, F.L., and Ju, Y., Negative pressure dependence of mass burning rates of H2/CO/O2/diluent flames at low flame temperatures. Combustion and Flame, 2010, 157(4): pp. 618–631.Google Scholar
Burke, M.P., Dryer, F.L., and Ju, Y., Assessment of kinetic modeling for lean H2/CH4/O2/diluent flames at high pressures. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2011, 33(1): pp. 905–912.Google Scholar
Chen, J.H., Hawkes, E.R., Sankaran, R., Mason, S.D., and Im, H.G., Direct numerical simulation of ignition front propagation in a constant volume with temperature inhomogeneities. I. Fundamental analysis and diagnostics. Combustion and Flame, 2006, 145(1): pp. 128–144.Google Scholar
Hawkes, E.R., Sankaran, R., Pébay, P.P., and Chen, J.H., Direct numerical simulation of ignition front propagation in a constant volume with temperature inhomogeneities. II. Parametric study. Combustion and Flame, 2006, 145(1): pp. 145–159.Google Scholar
Zhang, H., Hawkes, E.R., Chen, J.H., and Kook, S., A numerical study of the autoignition of dimethyl ether with temperature inhomogeneities. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2013, 34(1): pp. 803–812.Google Scholar
Yoo, C.S., Lu, T., Chen, J.H., and Law, C.K., Direct numerical simulations of ignition of a lean n-heptane/air mixture with temperature inhomogeneities at constant volume: Parametric study. Combustion and Flame, 2011, 158(9): pp. 1727–1741.Google Scholar
Schulz, O. and Noiray, N., Combustion regimes in sequential combustors: Flame propagation and autoignition at elevated temperature and pressure. Combustion and Flame, 2019, 205: pp. 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankaran, R., Im, H.G., Hawkes, E.R., and Chen, J.H., The effects of non-uniform temperature distribution on the ignition of a lean homogeneous hydrogen–air mixture. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2005, 30(1): pp. 875–882.Google Scholar
Mansfield, A.B. and Wooldridge, M.S., High-pressure low-temperature ignition behavior of syngas mixtures. Combustion and Flame, 2014, 161(9): pp. 2242–2251.Google Scholar
Luong, M.B., Hernández Pérez, F.E., and Im, H.G., Prediction of ignition modes of NTC-fuel/air mixtures with temperature and concentration fluctuations. Combustion and Flame, 2020, 213: pp. 382–393.Google Scholar
Pal, P., Mansfield, A.B., Arias, P.G., Wooldridge, M.S., and Im, H.G., A computational study of syngas auto-ignition characteristics at high-pressure and low-temperature conditions with thermal inhomogeneities. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 2015, 19(5): pp. 587–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groot, G., van Oijen, J., de Goey, L., Seshadri, K., and Peters, N., The effects of strain and curvature on the mass burning rate of premixed laminar flames. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 2002, 6(4): pp. 675–695.Google Scholar
Williams, F.A., Combustion Theory: The Fundamental Theory of Chemically Reacting Flow Systems. 1994, Perseus Books.Google Scholar
Tseng, L.K., Ismail, M., and Faeth, G.M., Laminar burning velocities and Markstein numbers of hydrocarbon/air flames. Combustion and Flame, 1993, 95(4): pp. 410–426.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, S.K., Extinction of laminar partially premixed flames. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2009, 35(6): pp. 528–570.Google Scholar
Gran, I.R., Echekki, T. and Chen, J.H., Negative flame speed in an unsteady 2-D premixed flame: a computational study, Symposium (International) on Combustion Science, 1996, 26(1): pp. 323–329.Google Scholar
Poinsot, T. and Veynante, D., Theoretical and Numerical Combustion. 2005, RT Edwards, Inc.Google Scholar
Sankaran, R. and Im, H.G., Effects of hydrogen addition on the Markstein length and flammability limit of stretched methane/air premixed flames. Combustion Science and Technology, 2006, 178(9): pp. 1585–1611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poinsot, T., Echekki, T., and Mungal, M., A study of the laminar flame tip and implications for premixed turbulent combustion. Combustion Science and Technology, 1992, 81(1): pp. 45–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, P., Hu, S., Wehrmeyer, J.A., and Pitz, R.W., Stretch and curvature effects on flames, in 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. 2004, Reno, NV: AIAA.Google Scholar
Wang, P., Wehrmeyer, J.A., and Pitz, R.W., Stretch rate of tubular premixed flames. Combustion and Flame, 2006, 145(1–2): pp. 401–414.Google Scholar
Amato, A., Day, M., Cheng, R.K., Bell, J., Dasgupta, D., and Lieuwen, T., Topology and burning rates of turbulent, lean, H2/air flames. Combustion and Flame, 2015, 162(12): pp. 4553–4565.Google Scholar
Jackson, G.S., Sai, R., Plaia, J.M., Boggs, C.M., and Kiger, K.T., Influence of H2 on the response of lean premixed CH4 flames to high strained flows. Combustion and Flame, 2003, 132(3): pp. 503–511.Google Scholar
Shanbhogue, S.J., Husain, S., and Lieuwen, T., Lean blowoff of bluff body stabilized flames: Scaling and dynamics. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2009, 35(1): pp. 98–120.Google Scholar
Egolfopoulos, F. Geometric and radiation effects on steady and unsteady strained laminar flames. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1994, 25(1): pp. 1375–1381.Google Scholar
Lieuwen, T., Neumeier, Y., and Zinn, B., The role of unmixedness and chemical kinetics in driving combustion instabilities in lean premixed combustors. Combustion Science and Technology, 1998, 135(1): pp. 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welle, E.J., Roberts, W.L., Carter, C.D., and Donbar, J.M., The response of a propane-air counter-flow diffusion flame subjected to a transient flow field. Combustion and Flame, 2003, 135(3): pp. 285–297.Google Scholar
Sung, C., Liu, J., and Law, C., Structural response of counterflow diffusion flames to strain rate variations. Combustion and Flame, 1995, 102(4): pp. 481–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, N., Turbulent Combustion. 1st ed. 2000, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Xuan, Y., Blanquart, G., and Mueller, M.E., Modeling curvature effects in diffusion flames using a laminar flamelet model. Combustion and Flame, 2014, 161(5): pp. 1294–1309.Google Scholar
Kee, R.J., Coltrin, M.E., and Glarborg, P., Chemically Reacting Flow: Theory and Practice. 1st ed. 2003: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Barlow, R., Dibble, R., Chen, J.Y., and Lucht, R., Effect of Damköhler number on superequilibrium OH concentration in turbulent nonpremixed jet flames. Combustion and Flame, 1990, 82(3–4): pp. 235–251.Google Scholar
Sutton, J.A. and Driscoll, J.F., Imaging of local flame extinction due to the interaction of scalar dissipation layers and the stoichiometric contour in turbulent non-premixed flames. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2007, 31(1): pp. 1487–1495.Google Scholar
Won, S.H., Dooley, S., Dryer, F.L., and Ju, Y., Kinetic effects of aromatic molecular structures on diffusion flame extinction. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2011, 33: pp. 1163–1170.Google Scholar
Mastorakos, E., Taylor, A., and Whitelaw, J., Scalar dissipation rate at the extinction of turbulent counterflow nonpremixed flames. Combustion and Flame, 1992, 91(1): pp. 55–64.Google Scholar
Peters, N., Length Scales in Laminar and Turbulent Flames. Numerical Approaches to Combustion Modeling (A 92-16977 04-25). Washington, DC, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., 1991, pp. 155–182.Google Scholar
Ihme, M., Cha, C.M., and Pitsch, H., Prediction of local extinction and re-ignition effects in non-premixed turbulent combustion using a flamelet/progress variable approach. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2005, 30(1): pp. 793–800.Google Scholar
Carnell, W.F. and Renfro, M.W., Stable negative edge flame formation in a counterflow burner. Combustion and Flame, 2005, 141(4): pp. 350–359.Google Scholar
Rajaram, R. and Lieuwen, T., Parametric studies of acoustic radiation from premixed flames. Combustion Science and Technology, 2003, 175(12): pp. 2269–2298.Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, S., Kostka, S., Tuttle, S.G., Renfro, M.W., and Cetegen, B.M., Blowoff mechanism of two dimensional bluff-body stabilized turbulent premixed flames in a prototypical combustor. Combustion and Flame, 2011, 158: pp. 1358–1371.Google Scholar
Smith, C., Nickolaus, D., Leach, T., Kiel, B., and Garwick, K., LES blowout analysis of premixed flow past v-gutter flameholder, in 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. 2007, Reno NV: AIAA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, R., Ozarovsky, H., Karpetis, A., and Lindstedt, R., Piloted jet flames of CH4/H2/air: experiments on localized extinction in the near field at high Reynolds numbers. Combustion and Flame, 2009, 156(11): pp. 2117–2128.Google Scholar
Dunn, M., Masri, A., Bilger, R., Barlow, R., and Wang, G.H., The compositional structure of highly turbulent piloted premixed flames issuing into a hot coflow. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2009, 32(2): pp. 1779–1786.Google Scholar
Lindstedt, R., Ozarovsky, H., Barlow, R., and Karpetis, A., Progression of localized extinction in high Reynolds number turbulent jet flames. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2007, 31(1): pp. 1551–1558.Google Scholar
Dunn, M.J., Masri, A.R., and Bilger, R.W., A new piloted premixed jet burner to study strong finite-rate chemistry effects. Combustion and Flame, 2007, 151(1–2): pp. 46–60.Google Scholar
Owston, R. and Abraham, J., Structure of hydrogen triple flames and premixed flames compared. Combustion and Flame, 2010, 157(8): pp. 1552–1565.Google Scholar
Buckmaster, J., Edge-flames. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2002, 28(5): pp. 435–475.Google Scholar
Buckmaster, J., Edge-flames and their stability. Combustion Science and Technology, 1996, 115(1–3): pp. 41–68.Google Scholar
Im, H. and Chen, J., Structure and propagation of triple flames in partially premixed hydrogen-air mixtures. Combustion and Flame, 1999, 119(4): pp. 436–454.Google Scholar
Liu, J.B. and Ronney, P.D., Premixed edge-flames in spatially-varying straining flows. Combustion Science and Technology, 1999, 144(1–6): pp. 21–46.Google Scholar
Daou, R., Daou, J. and Dold, J., Effect of volumetric heat loss on triple-flame propagation. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2002, 29(2): pp. 1559–1564.Google Scholar
Cha, M.S. and Ronney, P.D., Propagation rates of nonpremixed edge flames. Combustion and Flame, 2006, 146(1–2): pp. 312–328.Google Scholar
Vedarajan, T. and Buckmaster, J., Edge-flames in homogeneous mixtures. Combustion and Flame, 1998, 114(1–2): pp. 267–273.Google Scholar
Ruetsch, G., Vervisch, L., and Liñán, A., Effects of heat release on triple flames. Physics of Fluids, 1995, 7(6): pp. 1447–1454.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Tarrazo, E., Vera, M., and Linan, A., Liftoff and blowoff of a diffusion flame between parallel streams of fuel and air. Combustion and Flame, 2006, 144(1–2): pp. 261–276.Google Scholar
Santoro, V.S., Liñán, A., and Gomez, A., Propagation of edge flames in counterflow mixing layers: experiments and theory. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2000, 28(2): p. 2039–2046.Google Scholar
Daou, R., Daou, J., and Dold, J., The effect of heat loss on flame edges in a non-premixed counterflow within a thermo-diffusive model. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 2004, 8(4): pp. 683–699.Google Scholar
Daou, R., Daou, J., and Dold, J., Effect of heat-loss on flame-edges in a premixed counterflow. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 2003, 7(2): pp. 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Favier, V. and Vervisch, L., Edge flames and partially premixed combustion in diffusion flame quenching. Combustion and Flame, 2001, 125(1–2): pp. 788–803.Google Scholar
Shay, M.L. and Ronney, P.D., Nonpremixed edge flames in spatially varying straining flows. Combustion and Flame, 1998, 112(1–2): pp. 171–180.Google Scholar
Cho, S.J. and Takita, K., Numerical study of premixed twin edge flames in a counterflow field. Combustion and Flame, 2006, 144(1–2): pp. 370–385.Google Scholar
Takita, K., Sado, M., Masuya, G., and Sakaguchi, S., Experimental study of premixed single edge-flame in a counterflow field. Combustion and Flame, 2004, 136(3): pp. 364–370.Google Scholar
Carnell, W. Jr and Renfro, M., Influence of advective heat flux on extinction scalar dissipation rate and velocity in negative edge flames. Combustion Theory Modelling, 2006, 10: pp. 815–830.Google Scholar
Bobba, M.K., Flame Stabilization and Mixing Characteristics in a Stagnation Point Reverse Flow Combustor. 2007, Georgia Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Driscoll, J., Turbulent premixed combustion: flamelet structure and its effect on turbulent burning velocities. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2008, 34: pp. 91–134.Google Scholar
Mastorakos, E., Taylor, A.M.K.P. and Whitelaw, J.H., Extinction of turbulent counterflow flames with reactants diluted by hot products. Combustion and Flame, 1995, 102: pp. 101–114.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, A.H. and Ballal, D.R., Gas Turbine Combustion: Alternative Fuels and Emissions. 2010, Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Clavin, P., Dynamic behavior of premixed flame fronts in laminar and turbulent flows. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 1985, 11(1): pp. 1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldredge, R. and Killingsworth, N., Experimental evaluation of Markstein-number influence on thermoacoustic instability. Combustion and Flame, 2004, 137(1–2): pp. 178–197.Google Scholar
Bychkov, V. and Liberman, M.A., Dynamics and stability of premixed flames. Physics Reports, 2000, 325(4–5): pp. 115–237.Google Scholar
Clanet, C. and Searby, G., First experimental study of the Darrieus–Landau instability. Physical Review Letters, 1998, 80(17): pp. 3867–3870.Google Scholar
Joulin, G., On the response of premixed flames to time-dependent stretch and curvature. Combustion Science and Technology, 1994, 97(1): pp. 219–229.Google Scholar
Park, Y. and Vlachos, D., Isothermal chain-branching, reaction exothermicity, and transport interactions in the stability of methane/air mixtures. Combustion and Flame, 1998, 114(1–2): pp. 214–230.Google Scholar
Kalamatianos, S., Park, Y., and Vlachos, D., Two-parameter continuation algorithms for sensitivity analysis, parametric dependence, reduced mechanisms, and stability criteria of ignition and extinction. Combustion and Flame, 1998, 112(1–2): pp. 45–61.Google Scholar
Bauwens, C.R.L., Bauwens, L., and Wierzba, I., Accelerating flames in tubes, an analysis. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2007, 31(2): pp. 2381–2388.Google Scholar
Markstein, G.H., Non-Steady Flame Propagation. AGARD-AR-75. 1964. Originally published by the Advisory Group for Aeronautical Research and Development, North Atlantic Treaty Organization (AGARD/NATO).Google Scholar
Cheng, R.K., Turbulent combustion properties of premixed syngas, in Synthesis Gas Combustion: Fundamentals and Applications, Lieuwen, T., Yang, V., and Yetter, R., eds. 2010, CRC Press, pp. 129–168.Google Scholar
Aldredge, R., Saffman–Taylor influence on flame propagation in thermoacoustically excited flow. Combustion Science and Technology, 2004, 177(1): pp. 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matalon, M., Intrinsic flame instabilities in premixed and nonpremixed combustion. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2007, 39: pp. 163–191.Google Scholar
Zambon, A. and Chelliah, H., Acoustic-wave interactions with counterflow single-and twin-premixed flames: Finite-rate kinetics, heat release and phase effects. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2007, 31(1): pp. 1247–1255.Google Scholar
Saitoh, T. and Otsuka, Y., Unsteady behavior of diffusion flames and premixed flames for counter flow geometry. Combustion Science and Technology, 1976, 12(4): pp. 135–146.Google Scholar
Im, H.G. and Chen, J.H., Effects of flow transients on the burning velocity of laminar hydrogen/air premixed flames. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2000, 28(2): pp. 1833–1840.Google Scholar
Im, H., Bechtold, J., and Law, C., Response of counterflow premixed flames to oscillating strain rates. Combustion and Flame, 1996, 105(3): pp. 358–372.Google Scholar
Huang, Z., Bechtold, J., and Matalon, M., Weakly stretched premixed flames in oscillating flows. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 1999, 2(2): pp. 115–133.Google Scholar
Egolfopoulos, F.N. Dynamics and structure of unsteady, strained, laminar premixed flames. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1994, 25(1): pp. 1365–1373.Google Scholar
Sankaran, R. and Im, H.G., Dynamic flammability limits of methane/air premixed flames with mixture composition fluctuations. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2002, 29(1): pp. 77–84.Google Scholar
Lauvergne, R. and Egolfopoulos, F.N., Unsteady response of C3H8/air laminar premixed flames submitted to mixture composition oscillations. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2000, 28: pp. 1841–1850.Google Scholar
Shreekrishna, and Lieuwen, T. High frequency response of premixed flames to acoustic disturbances, in 15th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. 2009, Miami, FL.Google Scholar
Clavin, P. and Joulin, G., High-frequency response of premixed flames to weak stretch and curvature: a variable-density analysis. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 1997, 1(4): pp. 429–446.Google Scholar
McIntosh, A.C., Pressure disturbances of different length scales interacting with conventional flames. Combustion Science and Technology, 1991, 75: pp. 287–309.Google Scholar
Ledder, G. and Kapila, A., The response of premixed flame to pressure perturbations. Combustion Science and Technology, 1991, 76: pp. 21–44.Google Scholar
van Harten, A., Kapila, A., and Matkowsky, B.J., Acoustic coupling of flames. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 1984, 44(5): pp. 982–995.Google Scholar
Peters, N. and Ludford, G.S.S., The effect of pressure variation on premixed flames. Combustion Science and Technology, 1983, 34: pp. 331–344.Google Scholar
Keller, D. and Peters, N., Transient pressure effects in the evolution equation for premixed flame fronts. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 1994, 6: pp. 141–159.Google Scholar
McIntosh, A.C., Deflagration fronts and compressibility. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London:A, 1999, 357: pp. 3523–3538.Google Scholar
Hancock, R.D., Schauer, F.R., Lucht, R.P., Katta, V.R., and Hsu, K.Y., Thermal diffusion effects and vortex–flame interactions in hydrogen jet diffusion flames. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1996, 26(1): pp. 1087–1093.Google Scholar
Patnaik, G. and Kailasanath, K., A computational study of local quenching in flame-vortex interactions with radiative losses. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1998, 27(1): pp. 711–717.Google Scholar
Roberts, W.L., Driscoll, J.F., Drake, M.C., and Goss, L.P., Images of the quenching of a flame by a vortex to quantify regimes of turbulent combustion. Combustion and Flame, 1993, 94(1–2): pp. 58–69.Google Scholar
Roberts, W.L. and Driscoll, J.F., A laminar vortex interacting with a premixed flame: Measured formation of pockets of reactants. Combustion and Flame, 1991, 87(3–4): pp. 245–256.Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A.N., A study of the equation of diffusion with increase in the quantity of matter, and its application to a biological problem. Moscow University Bulletin of Mathematics, 1937, 1: pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Aldushin, A., Zel’dovich, Y.B., and Khudyaev, S., Numerical investigation of flame propagation in a mixture reacting at the initial temperature. Combustion, Explosion and Shock Waves, 1979, 15(6): pp. 705–710.Google Scholar
Clavin, P. and Liñán, A., Theory of gaseous combustion, in Nonequilibrium Cooperative Phenomena in Physics and Related Fields, Velarde, M.G., ed. 1984, Springer, pp. 291–338.Google Scholar
Aronson, D.G. and Weinberger, H.F., Nonlinear diffusion in population genetics, combustion, and nerve pulse propagation, in Partial Differential Equations and Related Topics, Goldstein, J.A., ed. 1975, Springer, pp. 5–49.Google Scholar
Ebert, U. and van Saarloos, W., Front propagation into unstable states: universal algebraic convergence towards uniformly translating pulled fronts. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 2000, 146(1–4): pp. 1–99.Google Scholar
Zeldovich, Y.B. and Barenblatt, G., Theory of flame propagation. Combustion and Flame, 1959, 3: pp. 61–74.Google Scholar
Zeldovich, Y.B. and Frank-Kamenetskii, D., A theory of thermal propagation of flame. Acta physiochimica URSS, 1938, 9: pp. 341–350.Google Scholar
Benguria, R., Cisternas, J., and Depassier, M., Variational calculations for thermal combustion waves. Physical Review E, 1995, 52(4): p. 4410.Google Scholar
Sabelnikov, V.A. and Lipatnikov, A.N., Transition from pulled to pushed premixed turbulent flames due to countergradient transport. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 2013, 17(6): pp. 1154–1175.Google Scholar
Corvellec, C., Bruel, P., and Sabelnikov, V., Turbulent premixed flames in the flamelet regime: burning velocity spectral properties in the presence of countergradient diffusion. Combustion and Flame, 2000, 120: pp. 585–588.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Internal Flame Processes
  • Tim C. Lieuwen, Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Book: Unsteady Combustor Physics
  • Online publication: 27 October 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108889001.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Internal Flame Processes
  • Tim C. Lieuwen, Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Book: Unsteady Combustor Physics
  • Online publication: 27 October 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108889001.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Internal Flame Processes
  • Tim C. Lieuwen, Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Book: Unsteady Combustor Physics
  • Online publication: 27 October 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108889001.010
Available formats
×