Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T23:33:10.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - From Edward O. Laumann, Peter V. Marsden, and David Prensky, “The Boundary Specification Problem in Network Analysis”

from III - Later Foundations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2021

Edited by
Mario L. Small ,
Brea L. Perry ,
Bernice Pescosolido  and
Edward B. Smith
Mario L. Small
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Brea L. Perry
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington
Bernice Pescosolido
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington
Edward B. Smith
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Get access

Summary

In their influential chapter on the boundary specification problem in network analysis, Laumann, Marsden, and Prensky (1989) argued that social network data often do not mirror the true underlying social structures in which individuals are embedded. Rather, the validity of network data hinges on the alignment of network boundaries and the social system or social mechanisms being studied. For this reason, the process of determining which actors and relationships should be included in a network is among the most critical research design issues in social network analysis, requiring a tight alliance of theory and method. Here, we build on Laumann and coauthors’ insights, updating their review with contemporary examples, and extending their ideas to the personal network research design context. We begin by identifying characteristics of personal network research, such as boundary spanning, that introduce unique challenges and opportunities to the boundary definition issue. We then apply concepts from their typology, reviewing common strategies for establishing boundaries through name generators in the context of personal network research designs.

Keywords

Personal social networksEgocentric networksBoundary specificationName generatorsName interpretersRealist versus nominalist approachesFunctional specificity
Type
Chapter
Information
Personal Networks
Classic Readings and New Directions in Egocentric Analysis
 , pp. 417 - 430
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alba, R. D. 1973. “A Graph-Theoretic Definition of a Sociometric Clique.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 3(1): 113–26.Google Scholar
Alba, R. D., and Moore, G.. 1978. “Elite Social Circles.” Sociological Methods and Research 7: 167–88.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. A. 1954. “Class and Committees in a Norwegian Island Parish.” Human Relations 7(1): 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. A. 1969. “Networks and Political Process.” Social Networks in Urban Situations 5(1969): 1–76.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. A. 1972. “Social Networks.” Addison-Wesley Model in Anthropology 26. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. A. 1979. “Network Analysis: Orienting Notion, Rigorous Technique or Substantive Field of Study?,” pp. 403–23 in Perspectives on Social Network Research, edited by Holland, P. W. and Leinhardt, S.. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Barth, E. A. T., and Johnson, S. D.. 1959. “Community Power and a Typology of Social Issues.” Social Forces 38: 29–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, F. 1969. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Barth, G. P. 1975. Instant Cities: Urbanization and the Rise of San Francisco and Denver. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bendix, R., and Lipset, S. M.. 1966. “Karl Marx’s Theory of Social Classes,” pp. 6–11 in Class, Status, and Power, edited by Bendix, R. and Liset, S. M.. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, R. B. 1959. Scientific Explanation: A Study of the Function of Theory, Probability and Law in Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Breiger, R. L. 1976. “Social Structure from Multiple Networks.” American Journal of Sociology 81(4): 730–80.Google Scholar
Breiger, R. L., Boorman, S. A., and Arabie, P.. 1975. “An Algorithm for Clustering Relational Data, with Application to Social Network Analysis and Comparison with Multidimensional Scaling.” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 12: 328–83.Google Scholar
Broom, L., and Jones, F. Lancaster. 1977. “Problematics in Stratum Consistency and Stratum Formation: An Australian Example.” American Journal of Sociology 82(4): 808–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, R. S. 1978a. “Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence as a Basis for Network Subgroups.” Sociological Methods and Research 7: 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, R. S. 1978b. “Stratification and Prestige among Elite Experts in Methodological and Mathematical Sociology circa 1975.” Social Networks 1: 105–58.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. 1958. “Common Fate, Similarity, and Other Indices of the Status of Aggregates of Persons as Social Entities.” Behavioral Science 3(1): 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. 1969. Custom and Politics in Urban Africa: A Study of Hausa Migrants in Yoruba Towns. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. 1974. Urban Ethnicity. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. 1961. The Adolescent Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Cooley, C. H. 1909. Social Organization. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
Crane, D. 1972. Invisible Colleges. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. 1958. “A Critique of the Ruling Elite Model.” American Political Science Review 52(2): 463–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R. A. 1961. Who Governs. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, A., Gardner, B. B., and Gardner, M. R.. 1941. Deep South. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Davis, J. A. 1970. “Clustering and Hierarchy in Interpersonal Relations: Testing Two Graph Theoretical Models on 742 Sociomatrices.” American Sociological Review 33: 843–51.Google Scholar
Erickson, B. H. 1979. “Some Problems of Inference from Chain Data.” Sociological Methodology 10: 276–302.Google Scholar
Farraro, T. J., and Sunshine, M. H.. 1964. A Study of a Biased Friendship Net. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, Youth Development Center.Google Scholar
Freeman, L. 1968. “Social Networks and the Structure Experiment.” Presented at a Conference on Methods in Social Network Analysis, April, Laguna Beach, CA.Google Scholar
Freeman, L. 1980. “The Gatekeeper, Pair-Dependency and Structural Centrality.” Quality and Quantity 14(4): 585–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galaskiewicz, J. 1979. “The Structure of Community Interorganizational Networks.” Social Forces 57: 1346–64.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–80.Google Scholar
Haas, J. E., and Drabek, T.. 1973. Complex Organizations: A Sociological Perspective. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Harary, F., Norman, R. Z., and Cartwright, D.. 1965. Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Heil, G. H., and White, H. C.. 1976. “An Algorithm for Finding Simultaneous Homomorphic Correspondences between Graphs and Their Image Graphs.” Behavioral Science 21: 26–35.Google Scholar
Homans, G. C. 1950. The Human Group. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar
Kadushin, C. 1966. “The Friends and Supporters of Psychotherapy: On Social Circles in Urban Life.” American Sociological Review 31: 786–802.Google Scholar
Kadushin, C. 1968. “Power, Influence, and Social Circles: A New Methodology for Studying Opinion Makers.” American Sociological Review 33: 685–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapferer, B. 1969. “Norms and the Manipulation of Relationships in a Work Context,” pp. 181–244 in Social Networks in Urban Situations, edited by Mitchell, J. C.. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Laumann, E. 1973. Bonds of Pluralism: The Form and Substance of Urban Social Networks. New York: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
Laumann, E. O., Galaskiewicz, J., and Marsden, Peter V.. 1978. “Community Structure as Interorganizational Linkages.” Annual Review of Sociology 4: 455–84.Google Scholar
Laumann, E., and Marsden, P.. 1979. “The Analysis of Oppositional Structures in Political Elites: Identifying Collective Actors.” American Sociological Review 44: 713–32.Google Scholar
Laumann, E. O., Marsden, P. V., and Galaskiewicz, J.. 1977. “Community-Elite Influence Structures: Extension of a Network Approach.” American Journal of Sociology 83(3): 594–631.Google Scholar
Laumann, E., and Pappi, F. U.. 1976. Networks of Collective Action: A Perspective on Community Influence Systems. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lenski, G. E. 1952. “American Social Classes: Statistical Strata or Social Groups.” American Journal of Sociology 58(2): 139–44.Google Scholar
Liebow, E. 1967. Tally’s Corner: A Study of Negro Streetcorner Men. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar
Lin, N., Dayton, P. W., and Greenwald, P.. 1978. “Analyzing the Instrumental Use of Relations in the Context of Social Structure.” Sociological Methods & Research 7(2): 149–66.Google Scholar
Lorrain, F., and White, H. C.. 1971. “Structural Equivalence of Individuals in Social Networks.” The Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1(1): 49–80.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. C. 1969. “Networks and Political Process,” pp. 51–66 in Social Networks in Urban Situations, edited by Mitchell, J. C.. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Molotch, H. 1976. “The City as Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place.” American Journal of Sociology 82: 309–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. 1979. “The Structure of a National Elite Network.” American Sociological Review 44: 673–92.Google Scholar
Newcomb, T. M. 1961. The Acquaintance Process. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ossowski, S. 1963. Class Structure in the Social Consciousness. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. 1951. The Social System. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. 1961. “An Outline of the Social System,” pp 30–79 in Theories of Society, edited by Parsons, T., Shils, E., Naegele, K. D., and Pitts, J. C.. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J., and Salancik, G. R.. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Roethlisberger, F., and Dickson, W. J.. 1939. Management and the Worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. 1953. “Perceptual Obstacles to Class Consciousness.” Social Forces 32: 22–7.Google Scholar
Sampson, S. F. 1969. “Crisis in a Cloister.” PhD dissertation. Cornell University, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Seiler, L. H., and Summers, G. F.. 1974. “Locating Community Boundaries: An Integration of Theory and Empirical Techniques.” Sociological Methods & Research 2(3): 259–80.Google Scholar
Snyder, D., and Kick, E. L.. 1979. “Structural Position in the World System and Economic Growth, 1955–1970: A Multiple-Network Analysis of Transnational Interactions.” American Journal of Sociology 84: 1096–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travers, J., and Milgram, S.. 1969. “An Experimental Study of the Small World Problem.” Sociometry 32: 425–43.Google Scholar
Useem, M. 1979. “The Social Organization of the American Business Elite.” American Sociological Review 44: 553–72.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1947. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Wellman, B. 1979. “The Community Question: The Intimate Networks of East Yorkers.” American Journal of Sociology 84(5): 1201–31.Google Scholar
Wheeldon, P. D. 1969. “The Operation of Voluntary Associations and Personal Networks in the Political Processes of an Inter-Ethnic Community,” pp. 128–80 in Social Networks in Urban Situations, edited by Mitchell, J. C.. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
White, H. C., Boorman, S. A., and Breiger, R. L.. 1976. “Social Structure from Multiple Networks.” American Journal of Sociology 81: 730–80.Google Scholar
Whyte, W. F. 1955. Street Corner Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Yancey, W. L., Erickson, E. P., and Juliani, R. N.. 1976. “Emergent Ethnicity: A Review and Reformation.” American Sociological Review 41: 391–403.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×