Book contents
- Physical Disability in British Romantic Literature
- Cambridge Studies in Romanticism
- Physical Disability in British Romantic Literature
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Politics of Ability
- Part II Aesthetics of Deformity
- Conclusion
- Appendix Dictionary Definitions of ‘Disability’ and ‘Deformity’
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Romanticism
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 November 2020
Book contents
- Physical Disability in British Romantic Literature
- Cambridge Studies in Romanticism
- Physical Disability in British Romantic Literature
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Politics of Ability
- Part II Aesthetics of Deformity
- Conclusion
- Appendix Dictionary Definitions of ‘Disability’ and ‘Deformity’
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Romanticism
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Physical Disability in British Romantic Literature , pp. 274 - 299Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Primary Sources
Addison, Joseph, and Steele, Richard. The Spectator. 5 vols. Ed. Bond, Donald. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Allen, Francis. A Complete English Dictionary: Containing an Explanation of All the Words Made Use of in the Common Occurrences of Life, or in the Several Arts and Sciences. London: J. Wilson and J. Fell, 1765. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Anon. ‘Dr. Gowland’s Vegetable Lotion.’ The Times. 5 May 1790. 1. Times Digital Archive: 1785–1985.Google Scholar
Anon. ‘A Vindication of the Rights of Woman.’ The Critical Review. 5 n.s. June (1792): 132–41.Google Scholar
Anon. ‘Review of Historical … View … of the French Revolution.’ The New Annual Register, 1794. 221–2. In Mary Wollstonecraft and the Critics 1788–2001. Ed. Devine, Harriet Jump. 2 vols. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
Anon. ‘Review of Historical … View … of the French Revolution.’ Monthly Review. 16 n.s. (1795): 393–402.Google Scholar
Anon. ‘The Disabled Soldier.’ In Satirical, Humourous, and Familiar Pieces of Prose. Manchester: G. Nicholson, 1796. 1–6.Google Scholar
Anon. ‘Art. XXV. Camilla; or, A Picture of Youth. By the Author of Evelina and Cecilia.’ English Review 28 (1796): 178–80. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Anon. ‘On the Death of Lord Nelson.’ The Times. 23 November 1805. 3. Times Digital Archive: 1785–1985.Google Scholar
Austen, Jane. Pride and Prejudice. Ed. Kinsley, James. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. ‘Of Deformity.’ In Lord Bacon’s Essays, or Counsels Moral and Civil. Trans. Willimot, William. 2 vols. London: H. Parson, J. Brotherton and W. Meadows, A. Bettesworth, S. Ballard, R. Gosling, and C. King, 1720. 271–73.Google Scholar
Bage, Robert. Hermsprong; Or Man as He Is Not. 3 vols. London: Minerva, 1796. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Bage, Robert. Hermsprong; Or Man as He Is Not. Ed. Perkins, Pamela. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview, 2002.Google Scholar
Bailey, Nathan. An Universal English Dictionary: Comprehending the Derivations of the Generality of Words in the English Tongue. London: E. Bell, J. Darby. A. Bettesworth, F. Fayram, J. Pemberton, J. Hooke, C. Rivington, F. Clay, J. Batley, F. Symon et al., 1724. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Bailey, Nathan. Dictionarium Britannicum: Or a More Compleat Universal Etymological English Dictionary Than any Extant. Containing Not Only the Words, and Their Explication; But Their Etymologies. London: T. Cox, 1730. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Bailey, Nathan. A Universal Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. Comprehending the Derivations of the Generality of Words in the English Tongue, Either Antient or Modern. Edinburgh: printed for the proprietors, 1764. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Bentick, John. The Spelling and Explanatory Dictionary of the English Language. London: Thomas Carnan, 1786. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Bicknell, Alexander. The History of Lady Anne Neville, Sister to the Great Early of Warwick. 2 vols. London: T. Cadell, 1776. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Blount, Thomas. Glossographia Anglicana Nova: Or, A Dictionary. London: D. Brown, T. Goodwin, J. Walthoe, M. Newborough, J. Nicholson , B. Took, D. Midwinter, and F. Coggan, 1707. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Browne, Thomas. The Union Dictionary, Containing All That Is Truly Useful in the Dictionaries of Johnson, Sheridan, and Walker. London: J. W. Myers, 1800. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Bullokar, John. The English Expositor Improv’d. London: A. and J. Churchill, 1707. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. A Vindication of Natural Society: Or, a View of the Miseries and Evils Arising to Mankind from Every Species of Artificial Society. In a Letter to Lord **** by a Late Noble Writer. London: M. Cooper, 1756.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. Ed. Phillips, Adam. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Burney, Charles. Memoirs of Doctor Burney. Ed. D’Arblay, Madame. 3 vols. London: Edward Moxon, 1832.Google Scholar
Burney, Frances. Diary and Letters of Madame D’Arblay (1778–1840). Ed. Memoirs of Doctor Burney. 3 vols. London: Edward Moxon, 1832.Google Scholar
Burney, Frances. Ed. Barrett, Charlotte and Dobson, Austin. 6 vols. London: Macmillan, 1905.Google Scholar
Burney, Frances. Camilla or A Picture of Youth. Ed. Bloom, Edward A. and Bloom, Lillian D.. Oxford World’s Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Byron, Lord George Gordon. The Deformed Transformed: A Drama. London: J. and H. L. Hunt, 1824.Google Scholar
Chamberlayne, Edward, and Chamberlayne, John. Angliae Notitia: Or the Present State of England, with Divers Remarks upon the Ancient State Thereof. London: S. Smith, B. Walford, T. Goodwin, M. Wooton, B. Tooke, T. Leigh, D. Midwinter, 1704.Google Scholar
Cocker, Edward. Cocker’s English Dictionary: Interpreting the Most Refined and Difficult Words. London: A. Back and A. Bettesworth, 1704. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Cocker, Edward. Cocker’s English Dictionary, Containing an Explanation of the Most Refined and Difficult Words and Terms in Divinity, Philosophy, Law, Physick, Mathematicks, Navigation, Husbandry, Military Discipline, and Other Arts and Sciences: And the Derivation of Them from the Hebrew, Greek, Latin, Italian, Spanish, French, and Other Languages. London: T. Norris, A. Bettesworth, 1715. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. ‘Selection from Mr. Coleridge’s Literary Correspondence. No. 1.’ Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine. 10 (October 1821): 253–62.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. The Complete Poetical Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge. 2 vols. Ed. Coleridge, Ernest Hartley. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Sara. ‘On the Disadvantages Resulting from the Possession of Beauty.’ In Sara Coleridge: A Victorian Daughter: Her Life and Essays. Ed. Mudge, Bradford Keyes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989. 187–200.Google Scholar
Coles, Elisha. An English Dictionary, Explaining the Difficult Terms That Are Used in Divinity, Husbandry, Physic, Philosophy, Law, Navigation, Mathematicks, and Other Arts and Science. London: F. Collins, R. Bonwicke, 1713. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Coles, Elisha. An English Dictionary, Explaining the Difficult Terms That Are Used in Divinity, Husbandry, Physic, Philosophy, Law, Navigation, Mathematicks, and Other Arts and Science. London: F. Collins, R. Bonwicke, 1717. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Comte, Auguste. Introduction to Positive Philosophy. Ed. Ferré, Frederick. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1988.Google Scholar
Cooper, Anthony Ashley. [Lord Shaftesbury]. Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times. Ed. Klein, Lawrence E.. Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Crocker, Hannah Mather. Observations on the Real Rights of Women, with Their Appropriate Duties, Agreeable to Scripture, Reason and Common Sense. Boston, MA: Printed for the Author, 1818.Google Scholar
Darwin, Erasmus. Zoonomia; Or, The Laws of Organic Life. 2 vols. London: J. Johnson, 1794–96.Google Scholar
[Enfield, William, and Giffiths, George E.]. ‘Art. IX. Camilla; or, A Picture of Youth. By the Author of Evelina and Cecilia.’ Monthly Review 21 (October 1796): 156–63.Google Scholar
Farington, Joseph. The Farington Diary. Ed. Grieg, James, 4 (20 September 1806 to 7 January 1808). New York: George H. Doran, 1924.Google Scholar
Fenwick, Eliza. Secresy; Or, The Ruin on the Rock. Ed. Grundy, Isobel. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview, 1998.Google Scholar
First Annual Report of the Poor Law Commissioners for England and Wales. London: W. Clowes, 1835.Google Scholar
Fisher, Anne. An Accurate New Spelling Dictionary, and Expositor of the English Language. London: Hawes, Clarke, and Collins, G. Robinson, E. Stevens, and T. Slack, 1773. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Fisher, Anne. An Accurate New Spelling Dictionary, and Expositor of the English Language. London: G. G. J. and J. Robinson and T. Slack, 1784. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Fisher, Anne. An Accurate New Spelling Dictionary, and Expositor of the English Language. London: G. Robinson, W. Nicoll, and S. Hodgson, 1788. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Fisher, Philip Wonder, the Rainbow, and the Aesthetics of Rare Experiences. London: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Gilpin, William. Observations on the River Wye, and Several Parts of South Wales, &c. Relative Chiefly to Picturesque Beauty; Made in the Summer of the Year 1770. London: R. Blamire, 1782.Google Scholar
Gilpin, William. Observations, Relative Chiefly to Picturesque Beauty, Made in the Year 1772. 2 vols. London: R. Blamire, 1786.Google Scholar
Gilpin, William. Three Essays: On Picturesque Beauty; On Picturesque Travel; and On Sketching Landscape: To Which Is Added a Poem, on Landscape Painting. London: R. Blamire, 1792.Google Scholar
Gilpin, William. Observations on Several Parts of the Counties of Cambridge, Norfolk, Suffolk, and Essex; Also on Several Parts of North Wales; Relative Chiefly to Picturesque Beauty in Two Tours, The Former Made in the Year 1769. The Latter in the Year 1773. London: T. Cadell and W. Davies, 1809.Google Scholar
Godwin, William. An Enquiry Concerning Political Justice, and Its Influence on General Virtue and Happiness. 2 vols. London: G. G. and J. Robinson, 1793.Google Scholar
Godwin, William. Enquiry Concerning Political Justice and Its Influence on Morals and Happiness. 2 vols. 2nd edn. London: G. G. and J. Robinson, 1796. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Godwin, William. Enquiry Concerning Political Justice and Its Influence on Morals and Happiness. 2 vols. 3rd edn. London: G. G. and J. Robinson, 1798. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Godwin, William. Lives of the Necromancers. Or, an Account of the Most Eminent Persons in Successive Ages, Who Have Claimed for Themselves, or To Whom Has Been Imputed by Others, the Exercise of Magical Power. London: Frederick J. Mason, 1834.Google Scholar
Godwin, William. Enquiry Concerning Political Justice. Ed. Preston, Raymond. New York: Knopf, 1926.Google Scholar
Godwin, William. Things as They Are or the Adventures of Caleb Williams. Ed. Hindle, Maurice. London: Penguin, 1988.Google Scholar
Godwin, William. Mandeville. Ed. Clemit, Pamela. London: William Pickering, 1992. Vol. 6 of Collected Novels and Memoirs of William Godwin. Gen. ed. Philp, Mark. 9 vols. London: William Pickering, 1992.Google Scholar
Godwin, William. Cloudesley. Ed. Hindle, Maurice. London: William Pickering, 1992. Vol. 7 of Collected Novels and Memoirs of William Godwin. Gen. ed. Philp, Mark. 9 vols. London: William Pickering, 1992.Google Scholar
Godwin, William. Deloraine. Ed. Hindle, Maurice. London: William Pickering, 1992. Vol. 8 of Collected Novels and Memoirs of William Godwin. Gen. ed. Philp, Mark. 9 vols. London: William Pickering, 1992.Google Scholar
Godwin, William. The History of the Life of William Pitt. In The Political and Philosophical Writings of William Godwin. Vol. 1: Political Writings I. Ed. Fitzpatrick, Martin. London: Pickering and Chatto, 1993.Google Scholar
Godwin, William. Thoughts on Man: Essay II: Of the Distribution of Talents. In The Political and Philosophical Writings of William Godwin. Vol. 6. Romanticism Redefined. Ed. Philp, Mark. London: Pickering and Chatto, 1993.Google Scholar
Godwin, William. Fleetwood: Or, The New Man of Feeling. Ed. Handwerk, Gary and Markley, A. A.. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview, 2001.Google Scholar
Godwin, William. St. Leon: A Tale of the Sixteenth Century. Ed. Brewer, William D.. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview, 2006.Google Scholar
Godwin, William. An Enquiry Concerning Political Justice. Ed. Philp, Mark. Oxford World’s Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Oliver. ‘The Distresses of a Common Soldier.’ The British Magazine. 1, June 1760, 369–72.Google Scholar
Grose, Francis. Military Antiquities Respecting a History of the English Army from the Conquest to the Present Time. 2 vols. London: T. Egerton, 1801.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Elizabeth. Memoirs of Modern Philosophers. Ed. Grogan, Claire. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview, 2000.Google Scholar
Hartley, David. Observations on Man, His Frame, His Duty, and His Expectations. 2 vols. London: Charles Hitch and Stephen Austen, 1749.Google Scholar
Hay, William. ‘Deformity: An Essay.’ In The Works of William Hay, Esq. 2 vols. London: J. Nichols, 1794.Google Scholar
Hays, Mary. The Victim of Prejudice. Ed. Ty, Eleanor. 2nd edn. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview, 1998.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, William. The Spirit of Age; or Contemporary Portraits. 2nd edn. London: Henry Colburn, 1825.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, William. ‘On Imitation.’ In The Complete Works of William Hazlitt. Ed. Howe, P. P.. 21 vols. London: J. M. Dent, 1930–34. 4: 72–7.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, William. ‘Essay XXXII. On the Picturesque and Ideal. A Fragment.’ In The Selected Writings of William Hazlitt. 9 vols. Ed. Wu, Duncan. London: Pickering and Chatto, 1998. 6: 284–7.Google Scholar
Herbert, George. The Works of George Herbert. Ed. Hutchison, F. E.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1941.Google Scholar
Holcroft, Thomas. Travels from Hamburg, through Westphalia, Holland, and the Netherlands, to Paris. 2 vols. London: Richard Phillips, 1804.Google Scholar
Holcroft, Thomas. Anna St. Ives. In The Novels and Selected Plays of Thomas Holcroft. Ed. Verhoeven, W. M.. 5 vols. London: Pickering and Chatto, 2007.Google Scholar
Holman, James. The Narrative of a Journey Undertaken in the Years 1819, 1820, & 1821, through France, Italy, Savoy, Switzerland, Parts of Germany Bordering on the Rhine, Holland, and the Netherlands; Comprising Incidents That Occurred to the Author, Who Has Long Suffered under a Total Deprivation of Sight; With Various Points of Information Collected on His Tour. London: F. C. and J. Rivington, 1822. Googlebooks.Google Scholar
Hume, David. Four Dissertations. London: A. Millar, 1757. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature. Ed. Mossner, Ernest C.. London: Penguin, 1985.Google Scholar
Hume, David. ‘Of the Standard of Taste.’ In Moral Philosophy. Ed. Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2006. 345–60.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis. An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue; in Two Treatises. I. Concerning Beauty, Order, Harmony, Design. II. Concerning Moral Good and Evil. 2nd edn. London: J. Darby, A. Bettesworth, F. Fayram, J. Pemberton, C. Rivington, J. Hooke, F. Clay, J. Batley, and E. Symon, 1726.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel. A Dictionary of the English Language. 2nd edn. 2 vols. London: W. Stahan, 1755. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Jones, Stephen. A General Pronouncing and Explanatory Dictionary of the English Language. London: Vernor, Hood; J. Cuthel, Ocilvy, Lackington, Allen, 1797. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Kersey, John. A New English Dictionary; Or, Compleat Collection of the Most Proper and Significant Words, Commonly Used in the Language; With a Short and Clear Exposition of Difficult Words and Terms of Art. London: Henry Bonwicke and Robert Knaplock, 1702. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Kersey, John. Dictionarium Anglo-Britannicum; Or, a General English Dictionary, Comprehending a Brief, But Emphatical and Clear Explication of All Sorts of Difficult Words. London: J. Wilde, H. Rhodes, and J. Taylor, 1708. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Kersey, John. A New English Dictionary. London: Robert Knaplock and R. and J. Bonwicke, 1713. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Kersey, John. A New English Dictionary. London: Robert Knaplock and R. and J. Bonwicke, 1731. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Kersey, John. A New English Dictionary. London: J. and J. Bonwicke and H. Knaplock, 1739. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Kersey, John. A New Classical English Dictionary, Or, a Complete Collection of the Most Proper and Significant Words, and Terms of Art, Commonly Used in the Language. 7th edn. Dublin: S. Powell, 1757. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Kersey, John. A New English Dictionary. London: L. Hawes, W. Clarke, R. Collins, S. Crowder, S. Bladen, R. Baldwin, W. Woodfall, 1772. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Knight, Richard Payne. The Landscape: A Didactic Poem in Three Books. Addressed to Uvedale Price, Esq. 2nd edn. London: W. Bulmer, 1794.Google Scholar
Knight, Richard Payne. An Analytical Inquiry into the Principles of Taste. 3rd edn. London: Luke Hansard, T. Payne, and J. White, 1806.Google Scholar
Lavater, Johann Caspar. Essays on Physiognomy. Trans. Hunter, Henry. 3 vols. London: John Murray, 1789.Google Scholar
Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. Nidditch, Peter H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Lockhart, John Gibson. Memoirs of the Life of Sir Walter Scott. 10 vols. Boston, MA: Houghton, Mifflin, 1901.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Henry. The Man of Feeling. Ed. Harkin, Maureen. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview, 2005.Google Scholar
Mandeville, Bernard. The Fable of the Bees: Or, Private Vices, Publick Benefits. 2nd edn. London: Edmund Parker, 1723. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Marchant, John. A New Complete English Dictionary. London: J. Fuller, 1760. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Martin, Benjamin. Lingua Britannica Reformata: Or, a New English Dictionary. London: J. Hodges et al., 1749.Google Scholar
Milton, John. ‘Paradise Lost.’ In The Complete Poetry and Essential Prose of John Milton. Ed. Kerrigan, William, Rumrich, John, and Fallon, Stephen M.. New York: The Modern Library, 2007. 293–697.Google Scholar
Murray, James. Ed. A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles; Founded Mainly on the Materials Collected by the Philological Society. 10 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1897.Google Scholar
Nicol Scott, Joseph. Universal Etymological Dictionary. London: T. Osborne and J. Shipton; J. Hodges; R. Baldwin; W. Johnston, and J. Ward, 1755. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collection Online.Google Scholar
The Oxford English Dictionary, Being a Corrected Reissue with an Introduction, Supplement, and Bibliography of a New English Dictionary on Historical Principles Founded Mainly on the Materials Collected by the Philological Society. 12 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1933.Google Scholar
The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989. Online version 2015.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Online version 2015.Google Scholar
Papers Illustrative of the Origin and Early History of the Royal Hospital at Chelsea. London: George E. Eyre and William Spottiswoode, 1872.Google Scholar
Parr, Samuel. A Spital Sermon, Preached at Christ Church, upon Easter Tuesday, April 15, 1800: To Which Are Added Notes. London: J. Mawman, 1801. Hathi Trust.Google Scholar
Phillips, Edward. New World of Words, Or Universal English Dictionary. 6th edn. Rev. John Kersey. London: J. Phillips and J. Taylor, 1706. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
Pratt, John Tidd. A Collection of All the Statutes in Force Respecting the Relief and Regulation of the Poor, With Notes and References. 2nd edn. London: Shaw, 1843.Google Scholar
Price, Uvedale. An Essay on the Picturesque, as Compared with the Sublime and the Beautiful; and, on the Use of Studying Pictures, for the Purpose of Improving Real Landscape. London: J. Robson, 1794.Google Scholar
Price, Uvedale. A Dialogue on the Distinct Characters of the Picturesque and the Beautiful in Answer to the Objections of Mr. Knight. London: J. Robson, 1801.Google Scholar
Price, Uvedale. Essays on the Picturesque as Compared with the Sublime and Beautiful; and On the Use of Studying Pictures for the Purpose of Improving Real Landscape. 3 vols. London: J. Mawman, 1810.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Edinburgh: John Bell and G. G. J. and J. Robinson, 1785. Googlebooks.Google Scholar
Robinson, Mary. Walsingham; or the Pupil of Nature. Ed. Shaffer, Julie A.. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview, 2003.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Emile or On Education. Trans. Bloom, Allan. London: Penguin, 1991.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Julie, or The New Heloise. Letters of Two Lovers Who Live in a Small Town at the Foot of the Alps. The Collected Writings of Rousseau. 14 vols. Trans. Stewart, Philip and Vaché, Jean. Hanover, NH: Dartford College Press, 1997. Vol. 6.Google Scholar
Salzmann, Christian Gotthilf, . Moralisches Elementarbuch: nebst einer Anleitung zum nützlichen Gebrauch desselben. 2 vols. Leipzig: Siegfried Lebrecht Crusius, 1785.Google Scholar
Scott, Sarah. Millenium Hall. Ed. Kelly, Gary. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview, 1995.Google Scholar
Sheldon, John. An Essay on the Fracture of the Patella or Kneepan. Containing a New and Efficacious Method of Treating That Accident, by Which the Deformity and Lameness That Arise from the Old and Common Mode of Treatment, Are Avoided. With Observations on the Fracture of the Olecranon. London: J. Johnson, P. Elmsley, T. Cadell, E, and C, Dilly, G. G. G. J. and J. Robinson, and J. Robson, 1789.Google Scholar
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein: or, The Modern Prometheus. The 1818 Text. Ed. Rieger, James. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein; Or the Modern Prometheus [1818]. Ed. Macdonald, D. L. and Scherf, Kathleen. 2nd edn. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview, 1999.Google Scholar
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein: The Original 1818 Text. Ed. Macdonald, D. L. and Scherf, Kathleen. 2nd edn. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview, 2005.Google Scholar
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein: The 1818 Text. Ed. Hunter, J. Paul. 2nd edn. New York: Norton, 2012.Google Scholar
Shelley, P. B. The Letters of Percy Bysshe Shelley. 2 vols. Ed. Ingpen, Roger. London: Isaac Pitman, 1909.Google Scholar
Shelley, P. B. ‘A Defence of Poetry.’ Percy Bysshe Shelley: The Major Works. Ed. Leader, Zachary and O’Neill, Michael. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. 674–701.Google Scholar
Smollett, Tobias The Adventures of Peregrine Pickle. Ed. Clifford, James L. and Boucé, Paul-Gabriel. Oxford World’s Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Stanhope, Philip Dormer, . [Earl of Chesterfield]. Principles of Politeness, and of Knowing the World. Ed. Trussler, John. 8th edn. London: J. Bell, 1778.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. Original Stories from Real Life; With Conversations, Calculated to Regulate the Affections, and Form the Mind to Truth and Goodness. London: J. Johnson, 1788. Gale. Eighteenth Century Collections Online.Google Scholar
‘M’ [Wollstonecraft, Mary]. ‘Art, VI. Camilla; or A Picture of Youth. By the Author of Evelina and Cecilia.’ The Analytical Review (August 1796): 142–8.Google Scholar
‘M’ [Wollstonecraft, Mary]. (‘W.Q’) ‘On Poetry, and Our Relish for the Beauties of Nature.’ The Monthly Magazine 3 (April 1797): 279–82.Google Scholar
‘M’ [Wollstonecraft, Mary]. Collected Letters of Mary Wollstonecraft. Ed. Wardle, Ralph M.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
‘M’ [Wollstonecraft, Mary]. A Short Residence in Sweden, Norway and Denmark and William Godwin, Memoirs of the Author of ‘The Rights of Woman’. Ed. Holmes, Richard. London: Penguin, 1987.Google Scholar
‘M’ [Wollstonecraft, Mary]. A Vindication of the Rights of Men, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, An Historical and Moral View of the French Revolution. Ed Todd, Janet. Oxford World’s Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
‘M’ [Wollstonecraft, Mary]. Mary and The Wrongs of Woman. Ed. Kelly, Gary. Oxford World’s Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
‘M’ [Wollstonecraft, Mary]. ‘Elements of Morality for the Use of Children.’ In The Works of Mary Wollstonecraft. Ed. Todd, Janet, Butler, Marilyn, and Rees-Mogg, Emma. 7 vols. London: Pickering and Chatto, 2004. Electronic edition. 2: 3–210.Google Scholar
‘M’ [Wollstonecraft, Mary]. ‘Thoughts on the Education of Daughters.’ In The Works of Mary Wollstonecraft. Ed. Todd, Janet, Butler, Marilyn, and Rees-Mogg, Emma. 7 vols. London: Pickering and Chatto, 2004. Electronic edition. 4: 2–49.Google Scholar
‘M’ [Wollstonecraft, Mary]. ‘An Historical and Moral View of the Origin and Progress of the French Revolution and the Effect It Has Produced in Europe.’ In The Works of Mary Wollstonecraft. Ed. Todd, Janet, Butler, Marilyn, and Rees-Mogg, Emma. 7 vols. London: Pickering and Chatto, 2004. Electronic edition. 6: 2–235.Google Scholar
‘M’ [Wollstonecraft, Mary]. ‘Letter on the Character of the French Nation.’ In The Works of Mary Wollstonecraft. Ed. Todd, Janet, Butler, Marilyn, and Rees-Mogg, Emma. 7 vols. London: Pickering and Chatto, 2004. Electronic edition. 6: 440–46.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. The Prose Works of William Wordsworth. Ed. Owen, W. J. B. and Smyser, Jane Worthington. 3 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. Poetical Works. Ed. Hutchinson, Thomas. Rev. Ernest de Selincourt. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. ‘Preface (1802).’ Lyrical Ballads. Ed. Mason, Michael. London: Longman, 1992. 55–87.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. The Letters of William and Dorothy Wordsworth, A Supplement of New Letters. Ed. Hill, Alan G.. Vol. 8. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. The Prelude: The Four Texts (1798, 1799, 1805, 1850). Ed. Wordsworth, Jonathan. London: Penguin, 1995.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. ‘[The Discharged Soldier] (edited from MS; composed late January 1798).’ In Romanticism: An Anthology. Ed. Wu, Duncan. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell, 1998. 273–7.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. The Major Works. Ed. Gill, Stephen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. Wordsworth’s Tract on the Convention of Cintra [Published 1809] with Two Letters of Wordsworth Written in the Year 1811 Now Republished. Ed. Dicey, A. V.. London: Humphrey Milford, 1915. Hathi Trust.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Abbey, Ruth. ‘Back to the Future: Marriage as Friendship in the Thought of Mary Wollstonecraft.’ Hypatia. 14.3 (1999): 78–95.Google Scholar
Abrams, M. H. The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition. London: Oxford University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Annandale, Ellen. ‘Assembling Harriet Martineau’s Gender and Health Jigsaw.’ Women’s Studies International Forum. 30.4 (2007): 355–66.Google Scholar
Armintor, Deborah Needleman. The Little Everyman: Stature and Masculinity in Eighteenth-Century English Literature. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Auger, Peter. The Anthem Dictionary of Literary Terms and Theory. London: Anthem, 2010.Google Scholar
Austin, Linda. Nostalgia in Transition: 1780–1917. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Averill, James H. Wordsworth and the Poetry of Human Suffering. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Badowska, Eva. ‘The Anorexic Body of Liberal Feminism: Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman.’ In Mary Wollstonecraft and the Critics 1788–2001. Ed. Jump, Harriet Devine. 2 vols. London: Routledge, 2002. 2: 320–40.Google Scholar
Baldick, Chris. In Frankenstein’s Shadow: Myth, Monstrosity, and Nineteenth-Century Writing. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Baldick, Chris. Ed. The Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms. 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Ball, John Clement. ‘Imperial Monstrosities: Frankenstein, the West Indies, and V. S. Naipaul.’ ARIEL: A Review of International Literature. 32.3 (2001): 31–58.Google Scholar
Bainbridge, Simon. British Poetry and the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars: Visions of Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Baines, Paul, Ferraro, Julian, and Rogers, Pat. Eds. The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Eighteenth-Century Writers and Writing 1660–1789. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.Google Scholar
Barker-Benfield, G. J. ‘Mary Wollstonecraft’s Depression and Diagnosis: The Relation between Sensibility and Women’s Susceptibility to Nervous Disorders.’ Psychohistory Review. 13.4 (1985): 15–31.Google Scholar
Barker-Benfield, G. J. ‘Mary Wollstonecraft: Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthwoman.’ In Mary Wollstonecraft and the Critics 1788–2001. Ed. Jump, Harriet Devine. 2 vols. London: Routledge, 2002. 2: 39–59.Google Scholar
Colin, Barnes, and Mercer, Geof. ‘Breaking the Mould: An Introduction to Doing Disability Research.’ In Doing Disability Research. Ed Barnes, Colin and Mercer, Geof. Leeds: Disability Press, 1997. 1–13.Google Scholar
Barton, Ellen L. ‘Textual Practices of Erasure: Representations of Disability and the Founding of the United Way.’ In Embodied Rhetorics: Disability in Language and Culture. Ed. Wilson, James C. and Lewiecki-Wilson, Cynthia. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2001. 169–99.Google Scholar
Baynton, Douglas C. ‘Disability and the Justification of Inequality in American History.’ In The New Disability History: American Perspectives. Ed. Longmore, Paul K. and Umansky, Laura. New York: New York University Press, 2001. 33–57.Google Scholar
Beatty, Heather R. Nervous Disease in Late Eighteenth-Century Britain: The Reality of a Fashionable Disorder. London: Pickering and Chatto, 2012.Google Scholar
Benedict, Barbara M. ‘Making a Monster: Socializing Sexuality and the Monster of 1790.’ In ‘Defects’: Engendering the Modern Body. Ed. Deutsch, Helen and Nussbaum, Felicity. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000. 127–53.Google Scholar
Benedict, Barbara M. ‘Displaying Difference: Curious Count Boruwlaski and the Staging of Class Identity.’ Eighteenth-Century Life. 30.3 (2006): 78–106.Google Scholar
Bewell, Alan. ‘An Issue of Monstrous Desire: Frankenstein and Obstetrics.’ Yale Journal of Criticism. 2 (1988): 105–28.Google Scholar
Bohrer, Susan F. ‘Harriet Martineau: Gender, Disability and Liability.’ Nineteenth-Century Contexts. 25 (2003): 21–37.Google Scholar
Boles, Janet K., and Long Hoeveler, Diane. Eds. Historical Dictionary of Feminism. 2nd edn. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow, 2004.Google Scholar
Bolt, David. The Metanarrative of Blindness: A Rereading of Twentieth-Century Anglophone Writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Botting, Eileen Hunt. Frankenstein and the Rights of the Child. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Botting, Fred. ‘Reflections of Excess: Frankenstein, the French Revolution and Monstrosity.’ In Reflections of Revolution: Images of Romanticism. Ed. Yarrington, Alison and Everest, Kelvin. London: Routledge, 1993. 28–38.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, Michael. Ed. Disabling Romanticism: Body, Mind, Text. Bradshaw, Michael. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, Michael. ‘“Its Own Concentred Recompense”: The Impact of Critical Disability Studies on Romanticism.’ Humanities. 8.2 (2019): 1–11.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, Michael, and Joshua, Essaka. ‘Introduction.’ In Disabling Romanticism: Body, Mind, and Text. Ed. Bradshaw, Michael. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. 1–27.Google Scholar
Brennan, Matthew C. ‘“The Ghastly Figure Moving at My Side”: The Discharged Soldier as Wordsworth’s Shadow.’ Wordsworth Circle. 18.1 (1987): 19–23.Google Scholar
Brewer, William D. ‘Mary Shelley on the Therapeutic Value of Language.’ In Critical Essays on Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley. New York: G. K. Hall, 1998. 152–65.Google Scholar
Brody, Miriam. ‘The Vindication of the Writes of Women: Mary Wollstonecraft and Enlightenment Rhetoric.’ In Feminist Interpretations of Mary Wollstonecraft. Ed. Falco, Maria J.. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1996. 105–23.Google Scholar
Bromwich, David. Disowned by Memory: Wordsworth’s Poetry of the 1790s. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Brooks, Peter. ‘What Is a Monster? (According to Frankenstein).’ In Frankenstein. New Casebooks. Ed. Botting, Fred. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995. 81–106.Google Scholar
Brown, Stephen W., and McDougall, Warren. Eds. The Edinburgh History of the Book in Scotland. Volume 2: Enlightenment and Expansion 1707–1800. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Bruhm, Steven. ‘William Godwin’s Fleetwood: The Epistemology of the Tortured Body.’ Eighteenth-Century Life. 16.2 (1992) 25–43.Google Scholar
Brune, Jeffrey A., and Wilson, Daniel J.. Eds. Disability and Passing: Blurring the Lines of Identity. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Bullard, Paddy. Edmund Burke and the Art of Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Burwick, Frederick. Poetic Madness and the Romantic Imagination. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Burwick, Frederick. The Encyclopedia of Romantic Literature. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.Google Scholar
Butler, Marilyn. Romantics, Rebels and Reactionaries: English Literature and Its Background 1760–1830. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Butler, Marilyn. Burke, Paine, Godwin, and the Revolution Controversy. Ed. Butler, Marilyn. Cambridge English Prose Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 1–17.Google Scholar
Carman, Colin. ‘Godwin’s Fleetwood, Shame and the Sexuality of Feeling.’ Nineteenth-Century Prose. 41 (2014): 225–54.Google Scholar
Chandler, James. Wordsworth’s Second Nature: A Study of the Poetry and Politics. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Chandler, James. ‘Proving a History of Evidence.’ In Questions of Evidence: Proof, Practice, and Persuasion across the Disciplines. Ed. Chandler, James, Davidson, Arnold I., and Harootunian, Harry. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1994. 275–81.Google Scholar
Chandler, James. An Archeology of Sympathy: The Sentimental Mode in Literature and Cinema. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Chase, Cynthia. ‘The Accidents of Disfiguration: Limits to the Literal and Rhetorical Reading in Book V of “The Prelude”.’ Studies in Romanticism. 18.4 (1979): 547–65.Google Scholar
Claeys, Gregory. ‘The Effects of Property on Godwin’s Theory of Justice.’ Journal of the History of Philosophy. 22.1 (1984): 81–101.Google Scholar
Clemit, Pamela. The Godwinian Novel: The Rational Fictions of Godwin, Brockden Brown and Mary Shelley. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Codr, Dwight. ‘“Her failing voice endeavoured, in vain, to articulate”: Sense and Disability in the Novels of Elizabeth Inchbald.’ Philological Quarterly. 87 (2008): 359–388.Google Scholar
Coffee, Alan M. S. ‘Freedom as Independence: Mary Wollstonecraft and the Grand Blessing of Life.’ Hypatia. 29.4 (2014): 908–24.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome. Ed. Monster Theory: Reading Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Cole, Georgina. ‘Rethinking Vision in Eighteenth-Century Paintings of the Blind.’ In Art as Visual Epistemology. Ed. Klinke, Harald. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 2014. 47–64.Google Scholar
Connelly, Tristanne, and Clark, Steve. Eds. Liberating Medicine: 1720–1835. London: Pickering and Chatto, 2009.Google Scholar
Costelloe, Timothy. The British Aesthetic Tradition: From Shaftesbury to Wittgenstein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Craciun, Adriana. ‘Violence against Difference: Mary Wollstonecraft and Mary Robinson.’ In Making History: Textuality and the Forms of Eighteenth Century Culture. Ed. Clingham, Greg. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press, 1998. 111–41.Google Scholar
Cuddon, J. A. A. Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory. 5th edn. Rev. M. A. R. Habib. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.Google Scholar
Darlington, Beth. ‘Two Early Texts: A Night-Piece and The Discharged Soldier.’ In Bicentenary Wordsworth Studies in Memory of John Alban Finch. Ed. Jonathan Wordsworth Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1970. 425–48.Google Scholar
Darlington, Beth. ‘Wordsworth and the Alchemy of Healing.’ The Wordsworth Circle. 29.1 (1998) 52–60.Google Scholar
Dart, Gregory. Rousseau, Robespierre and English Romanticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine. ‘Marvelous Facts and Miraculous Evidence in Early Modern Europe.’ In Questions of Evidence: Proof, Practice, and Persuasion across the Disciplines. Ed. Chandler, James, Davidson, Arnold I., and Harootunian, Harry. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1994. 243–74.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine. ʻHistorical Epistemology.’ In Questions of Evidence: Proof, Practice, and Persuasion across the Disciplines. Ed. Chandler, James, Davidson, Arnold I., and Harootunian, Harry. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1994. 282–9.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, and Park, Katharine. Wonders and the Order of Nature 1150–1750. New York: Zone, 1998.Google Scholar
Davidson, Arnold I. The Emergence of Sexuality: Historical Epistemology and the Formation of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Davidson, Jenny. Breeding: A Partial History of the Eighteenth Century. New York: Columbia University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Davis, Lennard J. Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness, and the Body. London: Verso, 1995.Google Scholar
Davis, Lennard J. ‘Dr. Johnson, Amelia, and the Discourse of Disability in the Eighteenth Century.’ In ‘Defects’: Engendering the Modern Body. Ed. Deutsch, Helen and Nussbaum, Felicity. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000. 54–74.Google Scholar
Davis, Lennard J. Ed. The Disability Studies Reader. 2nd edn. New York: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Davis, Lennard J. ‘Seeing the Object as in Itself It Really Is: Beyond the Metaphor of Disability.’ The Madwoman and the Blindman: Jane Eyre, Discourse, Disability. Ed. Bolt, David, Rodas, Julia Miele, and Donaldson, Elizabeth J.. Columbus: Ohio University Press, 2012. ix–xii.Google Scholar
Davis, Todd F., and Womack, Kenneth. Eds. Mapping the Ethical Turn: A Reader in Ethics, Culture, and Literary Theory. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2001.Google Scholar
De Man, Paul. ‘Autobiography as De-facement.’ Modern Language Notes. 94.5 (1979): 919–30.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Helen. ‘Exemplary Aberration: Samuel Johnson and the English Canon.’ In Disability Studies: Enabling the Humanities. Ed. Snyder, Sharon, Jo Brueggemann, Brenda and Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. New York: MLA, 2002. 197–210.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Helen, and Nussbaum, Felicity. Eds. ‘Defects’: Engendering the Modern Body. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Dickie, Simon. Cruelty and Laughter: Forgotten Comic Literature and the Unsentimental Eighteenth-Century. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Dolan, Elizabeth A. Seeing Suffering in Women’s Literature of the Romantic Era. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar
Doody, Margaret Anne. Frances Burney: The Life in the Works. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Drake, Robert F. ‘A Critique of the Role of Traditional Charities.’ In Disability and Society: Emerging Issues and Insights. Ed. Barton, Len. Longman Sociology Series. London: Longman, 1996. 147–66.Google Scholar
Elfenbein, Andrew. ‘Editor’s Introduction. Byron and Disability.’ European Romantic Review. 12:3 (2001): 247–8.Google Scholar
Ellsworth, Phoebe C., Merrill Carlsmith, J., and Henson, Alexander. ‘The Stare as a Stimulus to Flight in Human Subjects: A Series of Field Experiments.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 21.3 (1972), 301–11.Google Scholar
Engel, David M. ‘Origin Myths: Narratives of Authority, Resistance, Disability, and Law.’ Law and Society Review. 27.4 (1993): 785–826.Google Scholar
Ennis, Daniel James. Enter the Press-Gang: Naval Impressment in Eighteenth-Century British Literature. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Epstein, Julia. The Iron Pen: Frances Burney and the Politics of Women’s Writing. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Faflak, Joel, and Wright, Julia M.. A Handbook of Romanticism Studies. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.Google Scholar
Farr, Jason S. ‘Sharp Minds/Twisted Bodies: Intellect, Disability, and Female Education in Frances Burney’s Camilla.’ The Eighteenth Century. 55.1 (2014): 1–17.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. Doing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Findlen, Paula. ‘Jokes of Nature and Jokes of Knowledge: The Playfulness of Scientific Discourse in Early Modern Europe.’ Renaissance Quarterly. 43:2 (1990): 292–331.Google Scholar
Finke, Laurie A. ‘A Philosophic Wanton: Language and Authority in Wollstonecraft’s Vindication of the Rights of Woman.’ In Mary Wollstonecraft and the Critics 1788–2001. Ed. Jump, Harriet Devine. 2 vols. London: Routledge, 2002. 2: 1–21.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, Victor. Attitudes and Disabled People: Issues for Discussion. New York: World Rehabilitation Fund, 1980.Google Scholar
Fisher, Philip. Wonder, the Rainbow, and the Aesthetics of Rare Experiences. London: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Flint, Kate. The Victorians and the Visual Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Franco, Dean. ‘Mirror Images and Otherness in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein.’ Literature and Psychology. 44 (1998): 80–95.Google Scholar
Franklin, Caroline. Mary Wollstonecraft: A Literary Life. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.Google Scholar
Frawley, Maria. ‘“A Prisoner to the Couch”: Harriet Martineau, Invalidism and Self-Representation.’ In The Body and Physical Difference: Discourses of Disability. Ed. Mitchell, David T. and Snyder, Sharon L.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Frawley, Maria. Invalidism and Identity in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Friedman, John Block. ‘Foreword.’ In The Ashgate Research Companion to Monsters and the Monstrous. Ed. Mittman, Asa Simon and Dendle, Peter J.. Farnham: Ashgate, 2012. xv–xxxix.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The Use of Pleasure: The History of Sexuality Volume 2. Trans. Hurley, Robert. London: Penguin, 1992.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. Sheridan, Alan. London: Penguin, 1997.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The Will to Knowledge: The History of Sexuality Volume 1. Trans. Hurley, Robert. London: Penguin, 1998.Google Scholar
Gabbard, Dwight Christopher. ‘Disability Studies in the British Long Eighteenth Century.’ Literature Compass. 8.2 (2011): 80–94.Google Scholar
Galperin, William H. The Return of the Visible in British Romanticism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Garden, Rebecca. ‘Illness and Inoculation: Narrative Strategies in Frances Burney’s Camilla.’ In Gender Scripts and Medicine and Narrative. Ed. Block, Marcelline and Laflen, Angela. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 2010. 64–94.Google Scholar
Garland Thomson, Rosemarie. Ed., Freakery: Cultural Spectacles of the Extraordinary Body. New York: New York University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Garland Thomson, Rosemarie. Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Garland Thomson, Rosemarie. ‘Byron and the New Disability Studies: A Response.’ European Romantic Review. 12 (2001): 321–7.Google Scholar
Garland Thomson, Rosemarie. ‘Integrating Disability, Transforming Feminist Theory.’ National Women’s Studies Association Journal. 14.3 (2002): 1–32.Google Scholar
Garland Thomson, Rosemarie. ‘The Politics of Staring: Visual Rhetorics of Disability in Popular Photography.’ In Disability Studies: Enabling the Humanities. Ed. Snyder, Sharon L., Jo Brueggemann, Brenda, and Garland Thomson, Rosemarie. New York: MLA, 2002. 56–75.Google Scholar
Garland Thomson, Rosemarie. Staring: How We Look. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Garland Thomson, Rosemarie. ‘The Story of My Work: How I Became Disabled.’ Disability Studies Quarterly. 34.2 (2014).Google Scholar
Gartner, Alan, and Joe, Tom. Eds. Images of the Disabled, Disabled Images. New York: Praeger, 1987.Google Scholar
Gigante, Denise. ‘Facing the Ugly: The Case of Frankenstein.’ English Literary History. 67 (2000): 565–87.Google Scholar
Gigante, Denise. Life: Organic Form and Romanticism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Sandra, and Gubar, Susan. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Imagination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Glausner, Richard, and Savile, Anthony. ‘Aesthetic Experience in Shaftesbury.’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 76 (2002): 25–74.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. Stigma: Notes on the Management of a Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1986.Google Scholar
Goldner, Ellen J. ‘Monstrous Body, Tortured Soul: Frankenstein at the Juncture between Discourses.’ In Genealogy and Literature. Ed. Quinby, Lee. Minneapolis: University of Minesota Press, 1995. 28–47.Google Scholar
Goodman, Kevis. ‘“Uncertain Disease”: Nostalgia, Pathologies of Motion, Practices of Reading.’ Studies in Romanticism. 49.2 (2010): 197–227.Google Scholar
Grob, Alan. ‘Wordsworth and Godwin: A Reassessment.’ Studies in Romanticism. 6 (1967): 98–119.Google Scholar
Grześkowiak-Krwawicz, Anna. Gulliver in the Land of Giants: A Critical Biography and the Memoirs of the Celebrated Dwarf Joseph Boruwlaski. Farnham: Ashgate, 2012.Google Scholar
Gubar, Susan. ‘Feminist Misogyny: Mary Wollstonecraft and the Paradox of “It Takes One to Know One”.’ In Mary Wollstonecraft and the Critics 1788–2001. Ed. Jump, Harriet Devine. 2 vols. London: Routledge, 2002. 2: 146–65.Google Scholar
Gunther-Canada, Wendy. ‘Mary Wollstonecraft’s “Wild Wish”: Confounding Sex in the Discourse on Political Rights.’ In Feminist Interpretations of Mary Wollstonecraft. Ed. Falco, Maria J.. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1996. 61–83.Google Scholar
Gustafson, Katherine. ‘“I Never Saw Such Children”: Disability, Industrialism, and Children’s Advocacy in William Godwin’s Fleetwood.’ Essays in Romanticism. 24.2 (2017): 125–43.Google Scholar
Haggerty, George E. Unnatural Affections: Women and Fiction in the Later 18th Century. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Halldenius, Lena. Mary Wollstonecraft and Feminist Republicanism: Independence, Rights and the Experience of Unfreedom. London: Pickering and Chatto, 2015.Google Scholar
Handwerk, Gary. ‘History, Trauma, and the Limits of the Liberal Imagination: William Godwin’s Historical Fiction.’ In Romanticism, History, and the Possibilities of Genre: Re-forming Literature 1789–1837. Ed. Rajan, Tilottama and Wright, Julia M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. 64–85.Google Scholar
Hanvey, Chris, and Philpot, Terry. Eds. Sweet Charity: The Role and Workings of Voluntary Organizations. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Harris, Diane. ‘Eugenia’s Escape: The Written Word in Frances Burney’s Camilla.’ Lumen. 17 (1998): 151–64.Google Scholar
Harriott, Howard H. ‘Defensible Anarchy?’ International Philosophical Quarterly. 33.3 (1993): 319–39.Google Scholar
Hartman, Geoffrey. Wordsworth’s Poetry 1787–1814. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Haslanger, Andrea. ‘From Man-Machine to Woman-Machine: Automata, Fiction, and Femininity in Dibdin’s Hannah Hewit and Burney’s Camilla.’ Modern Philology. 111.4 (2014): 788–817.Google Scholar
Hays, Peter L. The Limping Hero: Grotesques in Literature. New York: New York University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Heffernan, James. ‘Looking at the Monster: Frankenstein and Film.’ Critical Inquiry. 24 (1997): 133–58.Google Scholar
Henke, Christoph. ‘Before the Aesthetic Turn: The Common Sense Union of Ethics and Aesthetics in Shaftesbury and Pope.’ Anglia: Journal of English Philology. 129 (2011): 58–78.Google Scholar
Hertz, Neil. ‘The Notion of Blockage in the Literature of the Sublime.’ In The End of the Line: Essays on Psychoanalysis and the Sublime. New York: Columbia University Press, 1985. 62–84.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. ‘Freedom and (Dis)Ability in Early Modern Political Thought.’ In Recovering Disability in Early Modern England. Ed. Hobgood, Allison P. and Wood, David Houston. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2013. 167–86.Google Scholar
Hodson, Jane. Language and Revolution in Burke, Wollstonecraft, Paine, and Godwin. Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate, 2007.Google Scholar
Howells, Carol Ann. ‘“The Proper Education of a Female… Is Still to Seek”: Childhood and Girls’ Education in Fanny Burney’s Camilla; Or, A Picture of Youth.’ British Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies. 7.2 (1984): 191–8.Google Scholar
Hudson, Geoffrey L. ‘Disabled Veterans and the State in Early Modern England.’ In Disabled Veterans in History. Ed. Gerber, David L.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2012. 117–44.Google Scholar
Hutchison, Iain. A History of Disability in Nineteenth-Century Scotland. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen, 2007.Google Scholar
Jacovides, Michael. ‘Locke’s Construction of the Idea of Power.’ Studies in History of Philosophy and Science. 34 (2003): 329–50.Google Scholar
James, Susan. ‘Mary Wollstonecraft’s Conception of Rights.’ In The Social and Political Philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft. Ed. Bergès, Sandrine and Coffee, Alan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. 148–65.Google Scholar
James-Cavan, Kathleen. ‘“All in me is Nature”: The Values of Deformity in William Hay’s Deformity: An Essay.’ Prose Studies 27 (2005): 27–38.Google Scholar
Janowitz, Anne. ‘The Romantic Fragment.’ In A Companion to Romanticism. Ed. Wu, Duncan. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999. 442–51.Google Scholar
Jeungel, Scott. ‘Godwin, Lavater, and the Pleasures of Surface.’ Studies in Romanticism. 35:1 (1996): 73–97.Google Scholar
Johnson, Claudia. Equivocal Beings: Politics, Gender, and Sentimentality in the 1790s – Wollstonecraft, Radcliffe, Burney, Austen. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Johnson, Nancy E. The English Jacobin Novel on Rights, Property and the Law: Critiquing the Contract. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.Google Scholar
Jones, Chris. Radical Sensibility: Literature and Ideas in the 1790s. London: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Joshua, Essaka. ‘“Blind Vacancy”: Sighted Culture and Voyeuristic Historiography in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein.’ European Romantic Review. 22.1 (2011): 49–69.Google Scholar
Jump, Harriet Devine. Ed. Mary Wollstonecraft and the Critics 1788–2001. 2 vols. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
Jungman, Robert. ‘Eve as a “Fair Defect” in Milton’s Paradise Lost, Book 10.’ The Explicator. 65.4 (2007): 204–6.Google Scholar
Keen, Paul. The Crisis of Literature in the 1790s: Print Culture and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Keane, Angela. ‘Mary Wollstonecraft’s Imperious Sympathies: Population, Maternity and Romantic Individualism.’ In Body Matters: Feminism, Textuality, Corporeality. Ed. Horner, Avril and Keane, Angela. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000. 29–57.Google Scholar
Kelly, Gary. Revolutionary Feminism: The Mind and Career of Mary Wollstonecraft. New York: St. Martin’s, 1992.Google Scholar
Kelly, Gary. Women, Writing, and Revolution, 1790–1827. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Kelly, Veronica, and von Mücke, Dorothea. Eds. Body and Text in the Eighteenth Century. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder. ‘The Ethics of Care, Dependence, and Disability.’ Ratio Juris. 24.1 (2011): 49–58.Google Scholar
Kivy, Peter. The Seventh Sense: A Study of Francis Hutcheson and Eighteenth-Century Aesthetics. 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Klancher, Jon. ‘English Romanticism and Cultural Production.’ In The New Historicism. Ed. Veeser, H. Aram. New York: Routledge, 1989. 77–88.Google Scholar
Korsmeyer, Carolyn. ‘The Two Beauties: A Perspective on Hutcheson’s Aesthetics.’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 38.2 (1979): 145–51.Google Scholar
Kowaleski Wallace, Elizabeth. Ed. Encyclopedia of Feminist Literary Theory. Abingdon: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar
Kramnick, Isaac. The Rage of Edmund Burke: Portrait of an Ambivalent Conservative. New York: Basic, 1977.Google Scholar
Kumari Campbell, Fiona. Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Abledness. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.Google Scholar
Larrissy, Edward. The Blind and Blindness in Literature of the Romantic Period. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Levinson, Marjorie. Wordsworth’s Great Period Poems: Four Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Lipking, Laurence. ‘Frankenstein the True Story; or, Rousseau Judges Jean-Jacques.’ In Mary Shelley. Frankenstein: The 1818 Text. Ed. Hunter, J. Paul. New York: W. W. Norton, 1996. 313–31.Google Scholar
Liu, Alan. Wordsworth: The Sense of History. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Locke, Don. A Fantasy of Reason: The Life and Thought of William Godwin. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980.Google Scholar
Lockridge, Laurence S. The Ethics of Romanticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Longmore, Paul. Telethons: Spectacle, Disability, and the Business of Charity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Lowe, E. J. ‘Necessity and the Will in Locke’s Theory of Action.’ History of Philosophy Quarterly. 3.2 (1986): 149–63.Google Scholar
Lund, Roger. ‘Laughing at Cripples: Ridicule, Deformity and the Argument from Design.’ Eighteenth-Century Studies. 39.1 (2005): 91–114.Google Scholar
MacCormack, Patricia. ‘Posthuman Teratology.’ In The Ashgate Research Companion to Monsters and the Monstrous. Ed. Mittman, Asa Simon and Dendle, Peter J.. Farnham: Ashgate, 2012. 293–309.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. Peru, IL: Open Court, 1999.Google Scholar
MacLennan, George. Lucid Interval: Subjective Writing and Madness in History. Rutherford, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Malchow, H. L. ‘Frankenstein’s Monster and Images of Race in Nineteenth-Century Britain.’ Past & Present. 139 (1993): 90–130.Google Scholar
Markley, A. A. ‘Charlotte Smith, the Godwin Circle, and the Proliferation of Speakers in The Young Philosopher.’ In Charlotte Smith in British Romanticism. Ed. Labbe, Jacqueline. London: Routledge, 2015. 87–99.Google Scholar
Markotić, Nicole. ‘Disability Studies.’ In The Johns Hopkins Guide to Literary Theory and Criticism. Ed. Groden, Michael et al. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Marshall, David. The Surprising Effects of Sympathy: Marivaux, Diderot, Rousseau, and Mary Shelley. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Mason, Michelle. ‘Moral Prejudice and Aesthetic Deformity: Rereading Hume’s “Of the Standard of Taste”.’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 59.1 (2001): 59–71.Google Scholar
McCann, Andrew. Cultural Politics in the 1790s: Literature, Radicalism and the Public Sphere. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1999.Google Scholar
McCrea, Barry. Frances Burney and Narrative Prior to Ideology. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2013.Google Scholar
McDonagh, Patrick. Idiocy: A Cultural History. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
McGann, Jerome. The Poetics of Sensibility: A Revolution in Literary Style. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar
McLane, Maureen N. Romanticism and the Human Sciences: Poetry, Population, and the Discourse of the Species. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Mee, Jon. Dangerous Enthusiasm: William Blake and the Culture of Radicalism in the 1790s. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Mellor, Anne K. Mary Shelley, Her Life, Her Fiction, Her Monsters. New York, Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Mendus, Susan, ‘The Magic in the Pronoun My.’ In Scanlon and Contractualism. Ed. Matravers, Matt. London: Frank Cass, 2003. 33–52.Google Scholar
Metzler, Irina. Disability in Medieval Europe: Thinking about Physical Impairment during the High Middle Ages, c. 1100–1400. London: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Michael, Emily. ‘Francis Hutcheson on Aesthetic Perception and Aesthetic Pleasure.’ British Journal of Aesthetics. 24.3 (1984): 241–55.Google Scholar
Milnes, Tim, and Sinanan, Kerry. Eds. Romanticism, Sincerity, and Authenticity. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Google Scholar
Mitchell, David T., and Snyder, Sharon L.. Eds. The Body and Physical Difference: Discourses of Disability. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Mitchell, David T., and Snyder, Sharon L.. Narrative Prosthesis: Disability and the Dependencies of Discourse. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Mitchell, David T., and Snyder, Sharon L.. ‘Representations of Disability, History of.’ In Encyclopedia of Disability. Ed. Albrecht, Gary L.. 5 vols. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2006. 3: 1382–94.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. J. T. Picture Theory: Essays in Verbal and Visual Representation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Mittman, Asa Simon, and Dendle, Peter J.. Eds. The Ashgate Research Companion to Monsters and the Monstrous. Farnham: Ashgate, 2012.Google Scholar
Montag, Warren. ‘“The Workshop of Filthy Creation”: A Marxist Reading of Frankenstein.’ In Mary Shelley. Frankenstein. Ed. Smith, Johanna M.. Case Studies in Contemporary Criticism. Boston, MA: Bedford, 1992. 300–311.Google Scholar
Mortensen, Preben. ‘Shaftesbury and the Morality of Art Expression.’ Journal of the History of Ideas. 55.4 (1994): 631–50.Google Scholar
Mossman, Mark. ‘Acts of Becoming: Autobiography, Frankenstein, and the Postmodern Body.’ Postmodern Culture. 11.3 (2001): 1–12.Google Scholar
Mossman, Mark. Disability, Representation and the Body in Irish Writing: 1800–1922. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.Google Scholar
Munro, D. H. ‘Archbishop Fénelon versus My Mother.’ Australasian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy. 28.3 (1950): 154–73.Google Scholar
Ni Chonaill, Siobhan. ‘“Why may not man one day be immortal?”: Population, Perfectibility, and the Immortality Question in Godwin’s Political Justice.’ History of European Ideas. 33 (2007): 25–39.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Caroline Louise. ‘The Chelsea Out-Pensioners: Image and Reality in Eighteenth-Century and Early Nineteenth-Century Social Care.’ PhD Diss. University of Newcastle. August 2014.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Felicity. ‘Feminotopias: The Pleasures of “Deformity” in Mid-Eighteenth-Century England.’ In The Body and Physical Difference: Discourses of Disability. Ed. Mitchell, David T. and Snyder, Sharon L.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997. 161–73.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Felicity. The Limits of the Human: Fictions of Anomaly, Race, and Gender in the Long Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 2006.Google Scholar
Offord, Mark. Wordsworth and the Art of Philosophical Travel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Oliver, Michael, and Barnes, Colin. The New Politics of Disablement. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.Google Scholar
O’Toole, Corbett Joan. ‘Disclosing Our Relationships to Disabilities.’ Disability Studies Quarterly. 33.2 (2013).Google Scholar
Packham, Catherine. Eighteenth-Century Vitalism: Bodies, Cultures, Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.Google Scholar
Parkes, Parkes. ‘Wooden Legs and Tales of Sorrow Done: The Literary Broken Soldier of the Late Eighteenth Century.’ Eighteenth-Century Studies. 39 (2013): 191–207.Google Scholar
Paulson, William R. Enlightenment, Romanticism, and the Blind in France. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Peckham, Morse. Romanticism and Ideology. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Pender, Stephen. ‘“No Monsters at the Resurrection”: Inside Some Conjoined Twins.’ Monster Theory: Reading Culture. Ed. Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996. 143–67.Google Scholar
Pierson, Chris. ‘The Reluctant Pirate: Godwin, Justice, and Property.’ Journal of the History of Ideas. 71.4 (2010): 569–91.Google Scholar
Pino, Melissa. ‘Burney’s Evelina and Aesthetics in Action.’ Modern Philology. 108.2 (2010): 263–303.Google Scholar
Pond, Kristen. ‘“Fairest Observers” and “Restless Watchers”: Contested Sites of Epistemology in Frances Burney’s Camilla.’ Studies in the Novel. 50.3 (2018): 315–35.Google Scholar
Poovey, Mary. ‘My Hideous Progeny: Mary Shelley and the Feminization of Romanticism.’ PMLA. 95 (1980): 332–47.Google Scholar
Poovey, Mary. The Proper Lady and the Woman Writer: Ideology as Style in the Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary Shelley, and Jane Austen. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Poston, Carol H. ‘Mary Wollstonecraft and “The Body Politic”.’ In Feminist Interpretations of Mary Wollstonecraft. Ed. Falco, Maria J.. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1996. 85–104.Google Scholar
Potkay, Adam. Wordsworth’s Ethics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Quayson, Ato. Aesthetic Nervousness: Disability and the Crisis of Representation. New York: Columbia University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Radcliffe, Evan. ‘Godwin from “Metaphysician” to Novelist: Political Justice, Caleb Williams, and the Tension between Philosophical Argument and Narrative.’ Modern Philology. 97.4 (2000): 528–53.Google Scholar
Richey, William. ‘The Rhetoric of Sympathy in Smith and Wordsworth.’ European Romantic Review. 13.4 (2002): 427–43.Google Scholar
Richman, Jared. ‘Monstrous Elocution: Disability and Passing in Frankenstein.’ Essays in Romanticism. 25.2 (2018): 187–207.Google Scholar
Rind, Miles. ‘The Concept of Disinterestedness in Eighteenth-Century British Aesthetics.’ Journal of the History of Philosophy. 40.1 (2002): 67–87.Google Scholar
Roberts, Charles W. ‘The Influence of Godwin on Wordsworth’s Letter to the Bishop of Llandaff.’ Studies in Philology. 29.4 (1932): 588–606.Google Scholar
Rodas, Julia Miele. ‘Autistic Voice and Literary Architecture in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein.’ In Disabling Romanticism. Ed. Bradshaw, Michael. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. 169–90.Google Scholar
Roe, Nicholas. Wordsworth and Coleridge: The Radical Years. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Roe, Nicholas. The Politics of Nature: Wordsworth and Some Contemporaries. London: Macmillan, 1992.Google Scholar
Rousso, Harilyn. Don’t Call Me Inspirational: A Disabled Feminist Talks Back. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Rounce, Adam. ‘William Godwin: The Novel, Philosophy, and History.’ History of European Ideas. 33.1 (2007): 1–8.Google Scholar
Sager, Jenny. The Aesthetics of Spectacle in Early Modern Drama and Modern Cinema: Robert Greene’s Theatre of Attractions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.Google Scholar
Salih, Sara. ‘Camilla and The Wanderer.’ In The Cambridge Companion to Frances Burney. Ed. Sabor, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Sanchez, Rebecca. Deafening Modernism: Embodied Language and Visual Poetics in American Literature. New York: New York University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Scheuermann, Mona. ‘The Study of Mind: The Later Novels of William Godwin.’ Forum for Modern Language Studies. 19.1 (1983): 16–30.Google Scholar
Schillmeier, Michael. Rethinking Disability: Bodies, Senses, Things. New York: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar
Sha, Richard C. ‘Towards a Physiology of the Romantic Imagination.’ Configurations. 17.3 (2009): 197–226.Google Scholar
Shildrick, Margrit. ‘The Disabled Body, Genealogy and Undecidability.’ Cultural Studies. 19.6 (2005): 755–70.Google Scholar
Shuttleton, David E. Smallpox and the Literary Imagination 1660–1820. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Siebers, Tobin. ‘Disability as Masquerade.’ Literature and Medicine. 23.1 (2004): 1–22.Google Scholar
Simpson, David. Wordsworth’s Historical Imagination: The Poetry of Displacement. New York: Methuen, 1987.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter, Cannold, Leslie, and Kuhse, Helga. ‘William Godwin and the Defence of Impartialist Ethics.’ Utilitas. 7.1 (1995): 67–86.Google Scholar
Six, Abigail Lee, and Thompson, Hannah. ‘From Hideous to Hedonist: The Changing Face of the Nineteenth-Century Monster.’ In The Ashgate Research Companion to Monsters and the Monstrous. Ed. Mittman, Asa Simon and Dendle, Peter J.. Farnham: Ashgate, 2012. 237–55.Google Scholar
Small, Helen. Love’s Madness: Medicine, the Novel and Female Insanity, 1800–1865. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Smith, Angela M. Hideous Progeny: Disability, Eugenics, and Classic Horror Cinema. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Snyder, Sharon L., and Mitchell, David T.. ‘Re-engaging the Body: Disability Studies and Resistance to Embodiment.’ Public Culture. 13.3 (2001): 367–90.Google Scholar
Snyder, Sharon L., and Mitchell, David T. Cultural Locations of Disability. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Snyder, Sharon L., Jo Brueggemann, Brenda, and Thomson, Rosemarie Garland. Eds. Disability Studies: Enabling the Humanities. New York: MLA, 2002.Google Scholar
Spacks, Patricia Meyer. ‘Energies of Mind: Plot’s Possibilities in the 1790s.’ Eighteenth-Century Fiction. 1.1 (1988): 37–52.Google Scholar
Stanback, Emily B. ‘Disability and Dissent: Thelwall’s Elocutionary Project.’ In John Thelwall: Critical Reassessments. A Romantic Circles Praxis Volume. Ed. Solomonescu, Yasmin, 2011. https://romantic-circles.org/praxis/thelwall/HTML/praxis.2011.stanback.htmlGoogle Scholar
Stanback, Emily B. ‘Wordsworthian Admonishment.’ The Wordsworth Circle. 44.2/3 (2013): 159–63.Google Scholar
Stanback, Emily B. The Wordsworth–Coleridge Circle and the Aesthetics of Disability. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.Google Scholar
Starr, G. Gabrielle. ‘Burney, Ovid, and the Value of the Beautiful.’ Eighteenth-Century Fiction. 24.1 (2011): 77–104.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Warren. ‘Wordsworth and the Stone of Night.’ The Wordsworth Circle. 13.4 (1982): 175–8.Google Scholar
Stolnitz, Jerome. ‘On the Origins of “Aesthetic Disinterestedness”.’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 20.2 (1961): 131–43.Google Scholar
Stone, C. F. ‘Narrative Variation in Wordsworth’s Versions of “The Discharged Soldier”.’ Journal of Narrative Technique. 4 (1974): 32–44.Google Scholar
Stone, Deborah A. The Disabled State. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Stef-Praun, Laura A. ‘Harriet Martineau’s “Intellectual Nobility”: Gender, Genius, and Disability.’ In Harriet Martineau: Authorship, Society, and Empire. Ed. Dzelzainis, Ella and Kaplan, Cora. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2010. 38–51.Google Scholar
Sterrenburg, Lee. ‘Mary Shelley’s Monster: Politics and Psyche in Frankenstein.’ In The Endurance of Frankenstein: Essays on Mary Shelley’s Novel. Ed. Levine, George and Knoepflmacher, U. C.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979. 143–71.Google Scholar
Swain, John, French, Sally, and Cameron, Colin. Controversial Issues in a Disabling Society. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Tauchert, Ashley. Mary Wollstonecraft and the Accent of the Feminine. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.Google Scholar
Taylor, Barbara. Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Tilley, Heather. ‘Wordsworth’s Glasses: The Materiality of Blindness in Romantic Vision.’ In Illustrations, Optics and Objects in Nineteenth-Century Literary and Visual Culture. Ed. Calè, Luisa and di Bello, Patrizia. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. 44–61.Google Scholar
Tilley, Heather. Blindness and Writing: From Wordsworth to Gissing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Thomas, Sophie. Romanticism and Visuality: Fragments, History, Spectacle. New York: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar
Thompson, Helen. Ingenuous Subjection: Compliance and Power in the Eighteenth-Century Domestic Novel. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Trott, Nicola. ‘The Coleridge Circle and the “Answer to Godwin”.’ Review of English Studies. 41 (1990): 212–29.Google Scholar
Turner, David M. Disability in Eighteenth-Century England: Imagining Physical Impairment. Routledge Studies in Modern British History. New York: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
Ulmer, William A. ‘William Wordsworth and Philosophical Necessity.’ Studies in Philology. 110.1 (2013): 168–98.Google Scholar
Varner, Paul. Historical Dictionary of Romanticism in Literature. London: Rowman and Littlefield, 2015.Google Scholar
Viadli, Amy. ‘Seeing What We Know: Disability and Theories of Metaphor.’ Journal of Literary and Cultural Disability Studies. 4.1 (2010): 33–54.Google Scholar
Wallace, Miriam L. Ed. Enlightening Romanticism, Romancing the Enlightenment: British Novels from 1750–1832. London: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar
Wang, Fuson. ‘The Historicist Turn of Romantic-Era Disability Studies, or Frankenstein in the Dark.’ Literature Compass. 14.7 (2017): 1–10.Google Scholar
Weston, Rowland. ‘Chivalry, Commerce, and Generosity: Godwin on Economic Equality.’ Eighteenth-Century Life. 41.2 (2017): 43–58.Google Scholar
Williams, Katherine Schaap. ‘“More Legs than Nature Gave Thee”: Performing the Cripple in the Fair Maid of the Exchange.’ English Literary History. 82.2 (2015): 491–519.Google Scholar
Wilson, Philip K. ‘Eighteenth-Century “Monsters” and Nineteenth-Century “Freaks”: Reading the Maternally Marked Child.’ Literature and Medicine. 21.3 (2002): 1–25.Google Scholar
Woodman, Ross. Sanity, Madness, Transformation: The Psyche in Romanticism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Wyse, Bruce. ‘“The Human Senses Are Insurmountable Barriers”: Deformity, Sympathy, and Monster Love in Three Variations on Frankenstein.’ In Global Frankensteins. Ed Davison, Carol Margaret and Mulvey-Roberts, Marie. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. 75–90.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. Throwing Like a Girl and Other Essays in Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Youngquist, Paul. ‘Lyrical Bodies: Wordsworth’s Physiological Aesthetics.’ European Romantic Review. 10 (1999): 152–62.Google Scholar
Youngquist, Paul. Monstrosities: Bodies and British Romanticism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Yousef, Nancy. ‘Wordsworth, Sentimentalism, and the Defiance of Sympathy.’ European Romantic Review. 17.2 (2006): 205–13.Google Scholar