Book contents
- Analysing Religious Discourse
- Analysing Religious Discourse
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Analysing Religious Discourse: Introduction
- 2 Interaction
- 3 Ethnography
- 4 Narrative
- 5 Multimodality
- 6 Rhetoric
- 7 Translation
- 8 Institutions
- 9 Media
- 10 Community
- 11 Education
- 12 Inter-religious Dialogue
- 13 Rituals
- 14 Metaphor
- 15 Emotion
- 16 Identity
- 17 Cognition
- 18 Sacred Texts
- 19 Ecology
- 20 Conclusion
- Key Terms
- References
19 - Ecology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 June 2021
Edited by
Book contents
- Analysing Religious Discourse
- Analysing Religious Discourse
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Analysing Religious Discourse: Introduction
- 2 Interaction
- 3 Ethnography
- 4 Narrative
- 5 Multimodality
- 6 Rhetoric
- 7 Translation
- 8 Institutions
- 9 Media
- 10 Community
- 11 Education
- 12 Inter-religious Dialogue
- 13 Rituals
- 14 Metaphor
- 15 Emotion
- 16 Identity
- 17 Cognition
- 18 Sacred Texts
- 19 Ecology
- 20 Conclusion
- Key Terms
- References
Summary
Discusses ecology and the role of natural environments in religious discourse, looking specifically at how religious institutions talked about the environment and conceive of it in relation to religious doctrine and belief and practice.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Analysing Religious Discourse , pp. 328 - 347Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
19.5 References
Alexander, R. (2009). Framing Discourse on the Environment: A Critical Discourse Approach. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
ARC & UNDP. (2015). Faith in the Future: The Faiths and the Sustainable Development Goals. The Bristol Commitments. Ipswich: The Alliance of Religions and Conservation and the United Nations Development Program.Google Scholar
Boff, L. (2014). Liberation theology and ecology: Rivals or partners, Leonardo Boff (1997). In Bohannon, R. (ed.), Religions and environments (pp. 319–28). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Brezina, V., McEnery, T., & Wattam, S. (2015). Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(2), 139–73.Google Scholar
Conradie, E., Bergmann, S., Deane-Drummond, C., & Edwards, D (eds.). (2014). Christian Faith and the Earth: Current Paths and Emerging Horizons in Ecotheology. London, New York: Bloomsbury T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Corbett, J. (2006). Communicating Nature: How We Create and Understand Environmental Messages. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Deane-Drummond, C. (2016). Pope Francis: Priest and prophet in the anthropocene. Environmental Humanities, 8(2), 256–62.Google Scholar
Fill, A., & Penz, H. (eds.). (2018). The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics. New York, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, G. (1988). A Theology of Liberation: History, Politics and Salvation. New York: Orbis Books.Google Scholar
Holy Bible: English Standard Version (ESV) Anglicised Compact Edition. (2013). London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Jamieson, K. H. (1975). Antecedent genre as rhetorical constraint. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 61, 406–15.Google Scholar
Kearns, L. (2004). The context of eco-theology. In Jones, G. (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Modern Theology (pp. 466–84). New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Khalid, F. M. (2002). Islam and the environment. Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Change, 5, 332–9.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 70–81.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2016). The immense cry channeled by Pope Francis. Environmental Humanities, 8(2), 251–5.Google Scholar
LeVasseur, T. (2018). Religion, language and ecology. In Fill, A. F. & Penz, H. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics (pp. 420–33). New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martin, J. (2004). Positive discourse analysis: Solidarity and change. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 49, 179–200.Google Scholar
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, C. (2010). Antecedent Genre. https://genreacrossborders.org/gxb-glossary/antecedent-genre.Google Scholar
Monagle, C. (2017). The Politics of extra/ordinary time: Encyclical thinking. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 4(1) 1390918.Google Scholar
Naess, A. (1995). The shallow and the long range, deep ecology movement. In Drengson, A. & Inoue, Y. (eds.), The Deep Ecology Movement: An Introductory Anthology (pp. 3–10). Berkley: North Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
Northcott, M. S. (1996). The Environment and Christian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope John Paul II, . (1990). The Ecological Crisis: A Common Responsibility. www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?id=5439.Google Scholar
Prozesky, M. H. (1976). Context and variety in religious language. Scottish Journal of Theology, 29(3), 201–13.Google Scholar
Social Spirituality. (2011). Octogesima Adveniens – A Call to Action. https://social-spirituality.net/octogesima-adveniens-a-call-to-action/.Google Scholar
Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By.London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stibbe, A. (2018). Positive discourse analysis: Rethinking human ecological relationships. In Fill, A. F. & Penz, H. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics (pp. 165–78). New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. (2009). Society and Discourse: How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1967). The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science, 155(3767), 1203–7.Google Scholar
Wolf, J., & Gjerris, M. (2009). A religious perspective on climate change. Studia Theologica, 63(2), 119–39.Google Scholar