Book contents
- Measuring Compliance
- Measuring Compliance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Measuring Compliance: The Challenges in Assessing and Understanding the Interaction between Law and Organizational Misconduct
- Part 1 The Compliance Industry, the State, and Measurement Needs
- 2 The Use and Measurement of Compliance Programs in the Legal and Regulatory Domains
- 3 Measuring Compliance in the Age of Governance: How the Governance Turn Has Impacted Compliance Measurement by the State
- 4 Understanding the Role of Power Distributions in Compliance
- Part 2 Quantitative Approaches to Measuring Corporate Compliance
- Part 3 Qualitative Approaches to Measuring Corporate Compliance
- Part 4 Mixed Methods and Building on Existing Compliance Research
- Index
- References
2 - The Use and Measurement of Compliance Programs in the Legal and Regulatory Domains
from Part 1 - The Compliance Industry, the State, and Measurement Needs
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 February 2022
By
Book contents
- Measuring Compliance
- Measuring Compliance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Measuring Compliance: The Challenges in Assessing and Understanding the Interaction between Law and Organizational Misconduct
- Part 1 The Compliance Industry, the State, and Measurement Needs
- 2 The Use and Measurement of Compliance Programs in the Legal and Regulatory Domains
- 3 Measuring Compliance in the Age of Governance: How the Governance Turn Has Impacted Compliance Measurement by the State
- 4 Understanding the Role of Power Distributions in Compliance
- Part 2 Quantitative Approaches to Measuring Corporate Compliance
- Part 3 Qualitative Approaches to Measuring Corporate Compliance
- Part 4 Mixed Methods and Building on Existing Compliance Research
- Index
- References
Summary
Abstract: This chapter examines the different ways in which compliance programs of business organizations are used and measured by various legal and regulatory remedial regimes; nearly all have articulated the goals of compliance programs as prevention and detection of violations of laws and regulations, and nearly all measure compliance program processes and efforts toward these goals rather than results and achievements in the actual prevention and detection of violations. The chapter argues that in order to achieve consistencies between the stated goals and actual performance of the compliance programs, and to meet the public interest of prevention and detecting corporate violations of laws and regulations, a movement toward outcome-based measurement is necessary.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Measuring ComplianceAssessing Corporate Crime and Misconduct Prevention, pp. 25 - 54Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
American Bar Association. Criminal Justice Standards: Monitors. www.americanbar.org/groups/criminal_justice/standards/MonitorsStandards/.Google Scholar
American Public Power Association. 2020. General Issue Brief: The Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978. Publicpower.org. January. www.publicpower.org/system/files/documents/PURPA%20-%20January%202020.pdf.Google Scholar
Armentano, Dominich. 1972. The great electrical equipment conspiracy. Reason, March. https://reason.com/1972/03/01/the-great-electrical-equipment/.Google Scholar
Baines, Ilana. 2018. Challenging the adequate procedures defence. Global Banking & Finance Review, May 25. www.globalbankingandfinance.com/challenging-the-adequate-procedures-defence/.Google Scholar
Benczkowski, Brian A. 2018. To All Criminal Division Personnel, memorandum, Selection of Monitors in Criminal Division Matters, October 11. www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/file/1100366/download.Google Scholar
Blackstone, William. 1765. Commentaries on the Laws of England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brock v. L.E. Myers Co., 818 F.2d 1270 (1987).Google Scholar
Caremark International Inc. Derivative Litigation, In re (698 A.2d 959 (Del. Ch. 1996)).Google Scholar
Corporate Criminal Liability and Prevention §3.02, n. 12.Google Scholar
Cutter, Henry. 2017. The Morning Risk Report: Hui Chen sparks debate over anti-bribery standard. The Wall Street Journal, October 24. www.wsj.com/articles/the-morning-risk-report-hui-chen-sparks-debate-over-anti-bribery-standard-1508845307.Google Scholar
Dana Container, Inc. v. Sec’y of Labor, 847 F.3d 495 500 (2017).Google Scholar
Floyd S. Pike Electrical Contractor, Inc. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission, 576 F.2d 72 (1978).Google Scholar
Fortune Business Insights. Enterprise Governance, Risk, and Compliance (eGRC) Market Size, Share & COVID-19 Impact Analysis, by Component (Software and Services), by Deployment Model (Cloud-Based, On-premise), by Enterprises Size (Large Enterprises, Small and Medium Enterprises), by Vertical (BFSI, Healthcare, Government, Energy & Utilities, Manufacturing, Retail & Consumer Goods, Telecom & IT, and Others), and Regional Forecast, 2020–2027. October 2020. www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/industry-reports/enterprise-governance-risk-and-compliance-egrc-market-101415.Google Scholar
Graham v. Chalmers Manufacturing Co. (188 A.2d 125 (Del. 1963)).Google Scholar
Grand View Research. Enterprise Governance, Risk and Compliance Market Size, Share & Trend Analysis Report by Component, by Software, by Service, by Enterprise Type, by Vertical, and Segment Forecasts, 2020–2027. February 2020. www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/enterprise-governance-risk-compliance-egrc-market.Google Scholar
Griffin, Benjamin. 2016. Origins of corporate power: The historical growth and transformation of corporations. Honors Thesis. Baylor University.Google Scholar
Hamilton Fixture v. Secretary of Labor, 16 BNA OSH 1889 (1994).Google Scholar
Haugh, Todd. 2017. The criminalization of compliance. Notre Dame Law Review, 92(3), 1215–70.Google Scholar
Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General. Corporate Integrity Agreements. https://oig.hhs.gov/compliance/corporate-integrity-agreements/index.asp.Google Scholar
Huising, Ruthanne and Silbey, Susan S.. 2018. From nudge to culture and back again: Coalface governance in the regulated organization. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 14 (October), 91–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Organization for Standardization. About Us. ISO. www.iso.org/about-us.html.Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization. 2014. ISO 19600:2014(en) Compliance Management Systems – Guidelines. www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:19600:ed-1:v1:en.Google Scholar
International Organization of Standardization. 2016. ISO 37001:2016(en) Anti-Bribery Management Systems – Requirements with Guidance for Use. ISO. www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:37001:ed-1:v1:en.Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization. Standards Catalogue. ISO. www.iso.org/standards-catalogue/browse-by-tc.html.Google Scholar
Jackson, Ketanji Brown and Grilli, Kathleen Cooper. 2021. Foundational Materials and Program Infrastructure: The History of the Organizational Sentencing Guidelines and the Emergence of Effective Compliance and Ethics Programs. In Society of Corporate Compliance & Ethics. The Complete Compliance and Ethics Manual 2021. https://compliancecosmos.org/history-organizational-sentencing-guidelines-and-emergence-effective-compliance-and-ethics-programs.Google Scholar
Labor v. Gem Indus., Inc., 17 BNA OSHC 1861 (1996).Google Scholar
MacDonell, John. 1908. The Law of Master and Servant: Being a Treatise on the Law Relating to Contracts of Service, Apprenticeship, and Employment. London: Stevens and Sons.Google Scholar
MacMurray, Worth. 2019. Three Predictions for the Future of ISO 37001. The FCPA Blog. February 13. https://fcpablog.com/2019/02/13/three-predictions-for-the-future-of-iso-37001/.Google Scholar
Micklethwait, John and Wooldridge, Adrian. 2003. The Company: A Short History of a Revolutionary Idea. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice. 2011. The Bribery Act 2010: Guidance about Procedures Which Relevant Commercial Organisations Can Put into Place to Prevent Persons Associated with Them from Bribing (Section 9 of the Bribery Act 2010). London. www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/legislation/bribery-act-2010-guidance.pdf.Google Scholar
Mohammadi, Milad D. 2018. The corporate guild order control of the Florentine Republic in the 13th and 14th century. Grand Valley Journal of History, 5(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Moore, Karl and Lewis, David. 2000. Foundations of Corporate Empire: Is History Repeating Itself? Hoboken, NJ: Financial Times Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Morford, Craig S. 2008. To Heads of Department Components and United States Attorneys, memorandum, Selection and Use of Monitors in Deferred Prosecution Agreements and Non-Prosecution Agreements with Corporations, March 7. www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/dag/legacy/2008/03/20/morford-useofmonitorsmemo-03072008.pdf.Google Scholar
Mothershed, Airon A. 2012. The $435 hammer and $600 toilet seat scandals: Does media coverage of procurement scandals lead to procurement reform? Public Contract Law Journal, 41(4), 855–80.Google Scholar
Moysich, Alane. 1997. The savings and loan crisis and its relationship to banking. In Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). History of the Eighties: Lessons for the Future. Vol. 1, An Examination of the Banking Crises of the 1980s and Early 1990s. Washington, DC: FDIC, pp. 167–88.Google Scholar
Occupational Safety and Health Administration. OSHA Field Operations Manual. www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/directives/CPL_02-00-163.pdf.Google Scholar
Office of the Inspector General. Proclamation, Supplemental Compliance Program Guidance for Hospitals, Federal Register 70, no. 19 (January 31, 2005): 4858. https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/docs/complianceguidance/012705HospSupplementalGuidance.pdf.Google Scholar
P. Gioiso & Sons, Inc. v. OSHRC, 115 F.3d 100 (1997).Google Scholar
Penn. Power & Light Co. v. OSHRC, 737 F.3d 350 358 (1984).Google Scholar
Pitt, Harvey L. and Groskaufmanis, Karl A.. 1990. Minimizing corporate civil and criminal liability: A second look at corporate codes of conduct. Georgetown Law Journal, 78 (June), 1559–654.Google Scholar
President, Dirs. & Co. of Bank v. Dandridge, 25 U.S. (12 Wheat.) 64, 68 (1827).Google Scholar
R. v. Skansen Interiors Ltd, unreported, Southwark Crown Court (2018).Google Scholar
Secretary of Labor v. American Engineering & Development Corp., OSHRC Docket No. 10–0359 (2010), citing Texland Drilling Corp., 9 BNA OSHC 1023, 1026 (No. 76–5037, 1980). www.oshrc.gov/assets/1/6/10-0359.pdf?2833.Google Scholar
Stansbury, Neill. 2016. International Anti-Bribery Standard ISO 37001. Transparency International UK. November 2. www.transparency.org.uk/international-anti-bribery-standard-iso-37001/.Google Scholar
US Congress. Bank Secrecy Act of 1970. 91st Cong. 2nd sess. 1970. www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-84/pdf/STATUTE-84-Pg1114-2.pdf#page=1.Google Scholar
US Department of Justice v. Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc. (2019). https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1177296/download.Google Scholar
US Department of Justice. 2015. FCPA: A Resource Guide to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/criminal-fraud/legacy/2015/01/16/guide.pdf.Google Scholar
US Department of Justice Criminal Division. 2020. Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs. www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/page/file/937501/download.Google Scholar
US Securities and Exchange Commission. 2014. Division of Enforcement. Sec.gov. April 14. www.sec.gov/page/enforcement-section-landing.Google Scholar
US Sentencing Commission. United States Sentencing Commission Guidelines Manual 1991, by William W. Wilkins Jr., Julie E. Carnes, Helen G. Corrothers, Michael S. Gelacak, George E. MacKinnon, A. David Mazzone, Ilene H. Nagel, Carol Pavilack Getty, & Paul L. Maloney, §3E1.1. www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/guidelines-manual/1991/manual-pdf/1991_Guidelines_Manual_Full.pdf.Google Scholar
US Sentencing Commission. United States Sentencing Commission Guidelines Manual 2018, by William H. Pryor Jr., Rachel E. Barkow, Charles R. Breyer, Danny C. Reeves, David Rybicki, & Patricia K. Cushwa, §3E1.1. www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/guidelines-manual/2018/GLMFull.pdf.Google Scholar
Watkins, Myron W. 1961. Electrical equipment antitrust cases: Their implications for government and for business. University of Chicago Law Review, 29(1), 97–110.Google Scholar
Yarborough v. Bank of England (1812) 16 East 6, 14 R. R. 272.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by