Book contents
- Changing Senses of Place
- Changing Senses of Place
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Climate Change and Ecological Regime Shifts
- Part II Migration, Mobility and Belonging
- Part III Renewable Energy Transitions
- Part IV Nationalism and Competing Territorial Claims
- Part V Urban Change
- Part VI Technological and Legal Transformations
- 19 Electronically Mediated Sense of Place
- 20 A Dynamic View of Local Knowledge and Epistemic Bonds to Place
- 21 Social Media and Experiences of Nature
- Part VII Design and Planning Strategies for Changing Senses of Place
- Part VIII Conclusion
- Index
- References
20 - A Dynamic View of Local Knowledge and Epistemic Bonds to Place
Implications for Senses of Place and the Governance of Biodiversity Conservation
from Part VI - Technological and Legal Transformations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 July 2021
Book contents
- Changing Senses of Place
- Changing Senses of Place
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Climate Change and Ecological Regime Shifts
- Part II Migration, Mobility and Belonging
- Part III Renewable Energy Transitions
- Part IV Nationalism and Competing Territorial Claims
- Part V Urban Change
- Part VI Technological and Legal Transformations
- 19 Electronically Mediated Sense of Place
- 20 A Dynamic View of Local Knowledge and Epistemic Bonds to Place
- 21 Social Media and Experiences of Nature
- Part VII Design and Planning Strategies for Changing Senses of Place
- Part VIII Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter argues that a better understanding of people–place relations and their role in the local reception – and frequent contestation – of today’s supra-national legal orders for biodiversity conservation requires considering the epistemic dimension. This means paying more attention to local knowledge and the epistemic bonds to place it weaves, recognising local cultural-worlds not just as meaning and identity-worlds, but also as knowledge-worlds. It illustrates these arguments with extracts from fishers and farmers governed by Natura 2000 biodiversity laws, showing how local knowledge provides a relevant lens for local assessment of such laws, a process sometimes leading to contestation, sometimes to acceptance, and a process always done together with others. This calls for the creation of these legal orders to not rely exclusively on expert views, instead incorporating local inputs. By adding the epistemic dimension, senses of place can become a more relational, dynamic and plural concept, encompassing the three processes of attachment, meaning-making and knowing.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Changing Senses of PlaceNavigating Global Challenges, pp. 259 - 270Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Adger, W., Barnett, J., Brown, K., Marshall, N. and O’Brien, K. (2012) ‘Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation’, Nature Climate Change, vol. 3, pp. 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1666Google Scholar
Batel, S. and Castro, P. (2018) ‘Reopening the dialogue between the theory of social representations and discursive psychology for examining the construction and transformation of meaning in discourse and communication’, British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 57, pp. 723–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12259Google Scholar
Benages-Albert, M., Di Masso, A., Porcel, S., Pol, E. and Vall-Casas, P. (2015) ‘Revisiting the appropriation of space in metropolitan river corridors’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 42, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.01.002Google Scholar
Bennett, N. J., Roth, R., Klain, S. C., et al. (2016) ‘Mainstreaming the social sciences in conservation’, Conservation Biology, vol. 31, pp. 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12788CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berkes, F. (2004) ‘Rethinking community-based conservation’, Conservation Biology, vol. 18, pp. 621–630. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00077.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blicharska, M., Orlikowska, E. H., Roberge, J. M. and Grodzinska-Jurczak, M. (2016) ‘Contribution of social science to large scale biodiversity conservation: a review of research about the Natura 2000 network’, Biological Conservation, vol. 199, pp. 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.007Google Scholar
Castro, P. (2012) ‘Legal innovation for social change: exploring change and resistance to different types of sustainability laws’, Political Psychology, vol. 33, pp. 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00863.xGoogle Scholar
Castro, P. and Mouro, C. (2016) ‘“Imagining ourselves” as participating publics: an example from biodiversity conservation’, Public Understanding of Science, vol. 25, pp. 858–872. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515581303CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castro, P. and Santos, T. (2020) ‘Dialogues with the absent other: using reported speech and the vocabulary of citizenship for contesting ecological laws and institutions’, Discourse and Society, vol. 31, pp. 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926519889126Google Scholar
Devine-Wright, P. (2009) ‘Rethinking NIMBYism: the role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place‐protective action’, Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, vol. 19, pp. 426–441. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.1004Google Scholar
Diamond, J. (1997) Guns, Germs and Steel: A Short History of Everybody for the Last 13,000 Years, London, Vintage.Google Scholar
European Commission (2009) Europe’s Nature for You, Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Ferranti, F., Turnhout, E., Beunen, R. and Behagel, J. H. (2014) ‘Shifting nature conservation approaches in Natura 2000 and the implications for the roles of stakeholders’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol. 57, pp. 1642–1657. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2013.827107Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1982) ‘The subject and power’. In Dreyfus, H and Rabinow, P (eds), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 208–222.Google Scholar
Hidalgo, C. and Hernandez, B. (2001) ‘Place attachment: conceptual and empirical questions’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 21, pp. 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, T. (2011) Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Klenk, N., Fiume, A., Meehan, K. and Gibbes, C. (2017) ‘Local knowledge in climate adaptation research: moving knowledge frameworks from extraction to co-production’, WIREs Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (2004) Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Maranta, A., Guggenheim, M., Gisler, P. and Pohl, C. (2003) ‘The reality of experts and the imagined lay person’, Acta Sociologica, vol. 46, pp. 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699303046002005Google Scholar
Mouro, C., Santos, T. and Castro, P. (2018) ‘Past–present discontinuity in ecological change and marine governance: an integrated narrative approach to artisanal fishing’, Marine Policy, vol. 97, pp. 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.06.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nazarea, V. D. (2006) ‘Local knowledge and memory in biodiversity conservation’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 35, pp. 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolosi, E. and Corbett, J. B. (2018) ‘Engagement with climate change and the environment: a review of the role of relationships to place’, International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, vol. 23, pp. 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2017.1385002Google Scholar
Raymond, C. M., Fazey, I., Reed, M. S., et al. (2010) ‘Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management’, Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 91, pp. 1766–1777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.023CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raymond, C. M., Kyttä, M. and Stedman, R. (2017) ‘Sense of place, fast and slow: the potential contributions of affordance theory to sense of place’, Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01674CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schiebinger, L. (2004) Plants and Empire: Colonial Bioprospecting in the Atlantic World, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, J. C. (1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed, Yale, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stoll-Kleemann, S. (2001) ‘Barriers to nature conservation in Germany: a model explaining opposition to protected areas’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 21, pp. 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0228Google Scholar
Tengo, M., Hill, R., Malmer, P., et al. (2017) ‘Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond: lessons learned for sustainability’, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, vol. 26–27, pp. 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, W. (2007) ‘Vernacular science knowledge: its role in everyday knowledge communication’, Public Understanding of Science, vol. 16, pp. 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506071785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, I. and Wynne, B. (2013) ‘Science, scientism and imaginaries of publics in the UK: passive objects, incipient threats’, Science as Culture, vol. 22, pp. 540–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2013.764072Google Scholar
Williams, D. (2014) ‘Making sense of “place”: reflections on pluralism and positionality in place research’, Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 131, pp. 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.002Google Scholar
Wynne, B. (1996) ‘May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert–lay knowledge divide’, in Lash, S., Szerszynski, B. and Wynne, B. (eds), Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology, London, SAGE Publications, pp. 44–83.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by