Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T05:48:03.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Prioritarianism and Climate Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2022

By
Maddalena Ferranna  and
Marc Fleurbaey
Edited by
Matthew D. Adler  and
Ole F. Norheim
Matthew D. Adler
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Ole F. Norheim
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Bergen, Norway
Get access

Summary

This chapter compares utilitarianism and prioritarianism as alternative social welfare frameworks for evaluating climate policies. We review the main debates in the climate policy literature concerning the parameters of the utilitarian social welfare function, and discuss the analytical requirements and climate policy implications of prioritarianism both in deterministic and stochastic settings. We show that, given the specific characteristics of the climate issue and the assumptions routinely made in the climate literature, prioritarianism tends to support more lenient climate policies than undiscounted utilitarianism. This is based on the assumption of economic and social progress that makes the current generation worse-off than future generations. The presence of catastrophic climate outcomes that endanger the living conditions of future generations (or of the poorest individuals living in the future) relaxes this result.

Keywords

climate changeprioritarianismSocial Cost of Carbonutilitarianisminequalityclimate policydamage risk
Type
Chapter
Information
Prioritarianism in Practice , pp. 360 - 407
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, F., Stanton, E., and Bueno, R. (2013). “Epstein-Zin Utility in DICE: Is Risk Aversion Irrelevant to Climate Policy?” Environmental and Resource Economics, 56: 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640–013-9645-zGoogle Scholar
Adler, M.D. (2012). Well-Being and Fair Distribution: Beyond Cost-Benefit Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adler, M.D., Anthoff, D., Bosetti, V., Garner, G., Keller, K., and Treich, N. (2017). “Priority for the Worse Off and the Social Cost of Carbon.” Nature Climate Change, 7: 443–449. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3298Google Scholar
Adler, M.D., and Treich, N. (2015). “Prioritarianism and Climate Change.” Environmental and Resource Economics, 62: 279–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640–015-9960-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anthoff, D., Hepburn, C., and Tol, R.S.J. (2009). “Equity Weighting and the Marginal Damage Costs of Climate Change.” Ecological Economics, 68: 836–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.017Google Scholar
Ayong Le Kama, A. (2001). “Preservation and Exogenous Uncertain Future Preferences.” Economic Theory, 18: 745–752.Google Scholar
Beltratti, A., Chichilnisky, G., and Heal, G. (1998). “Uncertain Future Preferences and Conservation.” In Chichilnisky, G., Heal, G., Vercelli, A. (eds.), Sustainability: Dynamics and Uncertainty. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Chapter 3.4, pp. 257–275.Google Scholar
Budolfson, M.B., and Spears, D. (2018). “Incorporating Non-Anthropocentric Valuation of Ecosystems and Animal Welfare into Environmental Decision-Making Models.” working paper.Google Scholar
Cline, W.R. (1992). The Economics of Global Warming. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Grainger, C.A., and Kolstad, C.D. (2010). “Who Pays a Price on Carbon?” Environmental and Resource Economics, 46: 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640–010-9345-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, P. (2001). Human Well-Being and the Natural Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P. (2008). “Discounting Climate Change.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 37:141–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166–008-9049-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, P., and Heal, G. (1979). Economic Theory and Exhaustible Resource, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Dennig, F., Budolfson, M.B., Fleurbaey, M., Siebert, A., and Socolow, R.H. (2015). “Inequality, Climate Impacts on the Future Poor, and Carbon Prices.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112: 15827–15832. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1513967112Google Scholar
Dhillon, A., and Mertens, J.-F. (1999). “Relative Utilitarianism: An Improved Axiomatization.” Econometrica, 67: 471–498. https://doi.org/10.1111.1468-0262.00033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, S., and Asheim, G.B. (2012). “Climate Policy under Sustainable Discounted Utilitarianism.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 63: 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2012.01.003Google Scholar
Dietz, S., Gollier, C., and Kessler, L. (2018). “The Climate Beta”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 87: 258–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2017.07.005Google Scholar
Ferranna, M. (2020). “Intergenerational Equity, Risk Aversion and the Social Cost of Carbon.” working paper.Google Scholar
Fleurbaey, M. (2010). “Assessing Risky Social Situations.” Journal of Political Economy, 118: 649–680. https://doi.org/10.1086/656513Google Scholar
Fleurbaey, M., Ferranna, M., Budolfson, M.B., et al. (2019). “The Social Cost of Carbon: Valuing Inequality, Risk, and Population for Climate Policy.” The Monist, 102: 84–109. https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/ony023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleurbaey, M., and Zuber, S. (2013). “Inequality aversion and separability in risk evaluation.” Economic Theory, 54: 675–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199–012-0730-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollier, C. (2002). “Discounting an Uncertain Future.” Journal of Public Economics, 85: 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00079-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollier, C. (2012). Pricing the Planet’s Future. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, J., Sato, M., Ruedy, R., Schmidt, G.A., and Lo, K. (2019). “Global Temperature in 2018 and Beyond.” www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2019/20190206_Temperature2018.pdf.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, J.C. (1955). “Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility.” The Journal of Political Economy, 63: 309–321.Google Scholar
Hope, C. (2006). “The Marginal Impact of CO2 from PAGE 2002.” Integrated Assessment Journal, 6: 9–56.Google Scholar
Kelleher, J.P. (2017). “Descriptive Versus Prescriptive Discounting in Climate Change Policy Analysis.” Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy, 15: 957–977.Google Scholar
Kent, D., Litterman, R.B., and Wagner, G. (2019). “Declining CO2 Price Paths.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116: 20886–20891. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1905755116Google Scholar
Kolstad, C.D. (1996). “Learning and Stock Effects in Environmental Regulation: The Case of Greenhouse Gas Emissions.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 31: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1996.0028Google Scholar
Kornek, U., Klenert, D., Edenhofer, O., and Fleurbaey, M. (2021). “The Social Cost of Carbon and Inequality: When Local Redistribution Shapes Global Carbon Prices.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 107: 102450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2021.102450.Google Scholar
Lemoine, D., and Rudik, I. (2017). “Steering the Climate System: Using Inertia to Lower the Cost of Policy.” American Economic Review, 107: 2947–2957. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemoine, D., and Traeger, C. (2014). “Watch Your Step: Optimal Policy in a Tipping Climate.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6: 137–166. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.6.1.137Google Scholar
Levinson, A. (2019). “Energy Efficiency Standards are More Regressive than Energy Taxes: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 6: S7–S36. https://doi.org/10.1086/701186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattauch, L., and Hepburn, C. (2016). “Climate Policies When Preferences Are Endogenous – and Sometimes They Are.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 40: 76–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/misp.12048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Méjean, A., Pottier, A., Fleurbaey, M. et al. Catastrophic climate change, population ethics and intergenerational equity. Climatic Change 163, 873–890 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02899-9Google Scholar
Millner, A. (2013). “On Welfare Frameworks and Catastrophic Climate Risks.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 65: 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2012.09.006Google Scholar
Millner, A., Dietz, S., and Heal, G. (2013). “Scientific Ambiguity and Climate Policy.” Environmental and Resource Economics, 55: 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640–012-9612-0Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W.D. (2007). “A Review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change.” Journal of Economic Literature, 45: 686–702. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.45.3.686Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W.D. (2008). A Question of Balance. New Haven and London: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W.D. (2017). “Revisiting the Social Cost of Carbon.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114: 1518–1523. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1609244114Google Scholar
Pindyck, R. (2019). “The Social Cost of Carbon Revisited.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 94: 140–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2019.02.003Google Scholar
Rabinowicz, W. (2002), “Prioritarianism for Prospects.” Utilitas, 14: 2–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820800003368Google Scholar
Rheinberger, C., and Treich, N. (2017). “Attitudes Toward Catastrophe.” Environmental and Resource Economics, 67: 609–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640–016-0033-3Google Scholar
Schelling, T. (1995). “Intergenerational Discounting.” Energy Policy, 23: 395–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(95)90164-3Google Scholar
Scovronick, N., Budolfson, M.B., Dennig, F., et al. (2017). “Impact of Population Growth and Population Ethics on Climate Change Mitigation Policy.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(46): 12338–12343. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618308114Google Scholar
Scovronick, N., Ferranna, M., Dennig, F., and Budolfson, M.B. (2020). “Valuing Health Impacts in Climate Policy: Ethical Issues and Economic Challenges.” Health Affairs, 39: 2105–2112. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01117Google Scholar
Schneider, M., Traeger, C., and Winkler, R. (2012). “Trading off Generations: Equity, Discounting, and Climate Change.” European Economic Review, 56: 1621–1644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroeconrev.2012.08.006Google Scholar
Schwerhoff, G., Dao, N.T., Edenhofer, O., et al. (2017). “Policy Options for a Socially Balanced Climate Policy.” Economics: The Open Access, Open Assessment E-Journal, 11: 1–11.Google Scholar
Stern, N.H. (2007). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sterner, T., and Persson, M. (2008). “An Even Sterner Review: Introducing Relative Prices into the Discounting Debate.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2: 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rem024Google Scholar
Tol, R.S.J. (2009). “The Economic Effects of Climate Change.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23: 29–51.Google Scholar
Tollefson, J. (2019). “Can the World Slow Global Warming?” Nature 573: 324–327. www.nature.com/immersive/d41586-019-02711-4/public/pdf/d41586-019-02711-4.pdfGoogle Scholar
Traeger, C. (2009). “Recent Developments in the Intertemporal Modeling of Uncertainty.” Annual Review of Resource Economics, 1: 261–285. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.resource.050708.144242Google Scholar
Traeger, C. (2014). “A 4-Stated DICE: Quantitatively Addressing Uncertainty Effects in Climate Change.” Environmental and Resource Economics, 59: 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640–014-9776-xGoogle Scholar
Weitzman, M.L. (2007). “A Review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change.” Journal of Economic Literature, 45: 703–724. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.45.3.703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzman, M.L. (2009). “On Modeling and Interpreting the Economics of Catastrophic Climate Change.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 91: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.91.1.1Google Scholar
Zuber, S., and Asheim, G.B. (2012). “Justifying Social Discounting: The Rank-Discounted Utilitarian Approach.” Journal of Economic Theory, 147: 1572–1601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2011.08.001Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×