Works Cited
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 July 2019
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Loving Writing/Ovid's Amores , pp. 189 - 197Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Works Cited
Arkins, B. (1990) “The anxiety of influence: Ovid’s Amores as κένωσις,” Latomus 49: 826–32.Google Scholar
Arnaldi, F. (1958) “La ‘retorica’ nella poesia di Ovidio,” in Herescu, N. I. (ed.) Ovidiana: Recherches sur Ovide. Paris: 23–31.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2001) Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and Other Latin Poets. London.Google Scholar
Bates, C. (2007) Masculinity, Gender and Identity in the English Renaissance Lyric. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Battistella, C. (2010) “Un modello epico per il primo amore di Apollo (Ov. ‘Met.’ 1.441–567 e Verg. ‘Aen.’ 9.590–663),” Vergilius 56: 19–25.Google Scholar
Bontyes, S. (2008) “Ovide, ‘Amores I, 8, 5–18,’ ou L’ambiguïté d’une magicienne,” Latomus 67: 366–77.Google Scholar
Booth, J. (2009) “The Amores: Ovid making love,” in Knox, P. E. (ed.) A Companion to Ovid. Malden, Mass.: 59–77.Google Scholar
Booth, J. (2011) “Negotiating with the epigram in Latin love poetry,” in Keith, A. (ed.) Latin Elegy and Hellenistic Epigram. Newcastle upon Tyne: 51–65.Google Scholar
Boyd, B. W. (1997) Ovid’s Literary Loves: Influence and Innovation in the Amores. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Boyd, B. W. (2002) “The Amores: the invention of Ovid,” in Boyd, B. W. (ed.) Brill’s Companion to Ovid. Leiden: 91–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, B. W. (2012) “Teaching Ovid’s love elegy,” in Gold, B. K. (ed.) A Companion to Roman Love Elegy. Malden, Mass.: 526–40.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. (1984) Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Brunelle, C. (2005) “Ovid’s satirical remedies,” in Ancona, R. and Greene, E. (eds.) Gendered Dynamics in Latin Love Poetry. Baltimore: 141–58.Google Scholar
Cahoon, L. (1983) “Juno’s chaste festival and Ovid’s wanton loves: ‘Amores’ 3.13,” ClAnt 2: 1–8.Google Scholar
Cahoon, L. (1984) “The parrot and the poet: the function of Ovid’s funeral elegies,” CJ 80: 27–35.Google Scholar
Cahoon, L. (1988) “The bed as battlefield: erotic conquest and military metaphor in Ovid’s Amores,” TAPhA 118: 293–307.Google Scholar
Casali, S. (2009) “The theophany of Apollo in Vergil, Aeneid 9: Augustanism and self-reflexivity,” in Athanassaki, L., Martin, R. P., and Miller, J. F. (eds.) Apolline Poetics and Politics. Athens: 299–327.Google Scholar
Caston, R. R. (2012) The Elegiac Passion: Jealousy in Roman Love Elegy. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citroni, M. (1995) “Ovidio e la scoperta del ‘lettore affezionato,’” in Poesia e lettori in Roma antica. Rome and Bari: 431–74.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2000) “Asymptotes of pleasure: thoughts on the nature of Roman erotic elegy,” Arethusa 33: 71–98.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2001) “Picture Arcadia: the politics of representation in Vergil’s Eclogues,” Vergilius 47: 89–116.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1989) “Love without elegy: the Remedia amoris and the logic of a genre,” Poetics Today 10: 441–69.Google Scholar
Damon, C. (1990) “Poem division, paired poems, and Amores 2.9 and 3.11,” TAPhA 120: 269–90.Google Scholar
Davis, J. T. (1977) Dramatic Pairings in the Elegies of Propertius and Ovid. Bern and Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Davis, P. J. (2006) Ovid and Augustus: A Political Reading of Ovid’s Erotic Poems. London.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1991) “Coldness and cruelty,” in Masochism, trans. Jean McNeil. New York: 9–138.Google Scholar
Diez, C. (2016) “Autofiktionalität bei Ovid: Überlegungen zur Gedankenführung und Sprecherinstanz in Amores 2,1,” Gymnasium 123: 425–48.Google Scholar
Downing, E. (1999) “Anti-Pygmalion: the praeceptor in Ars amatoria, Book 3,” in Porter, J. I. (ed.) Constructions of the Classical Body. Ann Arbor: 235–51.Google Scholar
duBois, P. (1988) Sowing the Body: Psychoanalysis and Ancient Representations of Women. Chicago.Google Scholar
Due, O. S. (1980) “Amores und Abtreibung: Ov. Am. II.13 & 14,” Classica et Mediaevalia 32: 133–50.Google Scholar
Du Quesnay, I. M. Le, M. (1973) “The Amores,” in Binns, J. W. (ed.) Ovid. London: 1–48.Google Scholar
Elliott, A. G. (1985) “Ovid and the critics: Seneca, Quintilian, and ‘seriousness,’” Helios 12: 9–20.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (2014) “The poet in an artificial landscape: Ovid at Falerii (Amores, 3.13),” in Nelis, D. and Royo, M. (eds.) Lire la ville: fragments d’une archéologie littéraire de Rome antique. Paris: 215–36.Google Scholar
Fear, T. (2000) “The poet as pimp: elegiac seduction in the time of Augustus,” Arethusa 33: 217–40.Google Scholar
Fear, T. (2005) “Propertian closure: the elegiac inscription of the liminal male and ideological contestation in Augustan Rome,” in Ancona, R. and Greene, E. (eds.) Gendered Dynamics in Latin Love Poetry. Baltimore: 13–40.Google Scholar
Felman, S. (2002) The Scandal of the Speaking Body: Don Juan with J. L. Austin, or Seduction in Two Languages, trans. C. Porter. Stanford.Google Scholar
Fischer, C. (2007) Der poetische Pakt: Rolle und Funktion des poetischen Ich in der Liebeslyrik bei Ovid, Petrarca, Ronsard, Shakespeare und Baudelaire. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Formisano, M. (2018) “‘Im Sinne der Antike’: masochism as Roman error in Venus in Furs,” in Dufallo, B. (ed.) Roman Error: Classical Reception and the Problem of Rome’s Flaws. Oxford: 153–75.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1953) Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality (1905), in Strachey, J. (ed. and trans.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. VII. London: 123–246.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1961) “Fetishism” (1927), in Strachey, J. (ed. and trans.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. XXI. London: 147–58.Google Scholar
Fulkerson, L. (2005) The Ovidian Heroine as Author: Reading, Writing, and Community in the Heroides. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gamel, M. K. (1989) “Non sine caede: abortion politics and poetics in Ovid’s Amores,” Helios 16: 183–206.Google Scholar
Gärtner, T. (2011) “Das Erlebnis der Impotenz: zur Genese, Struktur und Rezeption von Ov., am. III, 7,” Latomus 70: 103–23.Google Scholar
Gauly, B. M. (1990) Liebeserfahrungen: zur Rolle des elegischen Ich in Ovids Amores. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. and Zissos, A. (2000) “Inspirational fictions: autobiography and generic reflexivity in Ovid’s proems,” G&R 47: 67–79.Google Scholar
Graf, F. (2002) “Myth in Ovid,” in Hardie, P. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Ovid. Cambridge: 108–21.Google Scholar
Greene, E. (1998) The Erotics of Domination: Male Desire and the Mistress in Latin Love Poetry. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Greene, E. (1999) “Travesties of love: violence and voyeurism in Ovid ‘Amores’ I.7,” CW 92: 409–18.Google Scholar
Greene, E. (2012) “Gender and elegy,” in Gold, B. K. (ed.) A Companion to Roman Love Elegy. Malden, Mass.: 357–71.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. (1997) “The invention of sexuality in the world-city of Rome,” in Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A. (eds.) The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge: 23–43.Google Scholar
Hallett, J. P. (1973) “The role of women in Roman elegy: counter-cultural feminism,” Arethusa 6: 103–24.Google Scholar
Hallett, J. P. (2009) “Sulpicia and her resistant intertextuality,” in van Mal-Maeder, D., Burnier, A., and Núñez, L. (eds.) Jeux de voix: énonciation, intertextualité et intentionnalité dans la littérature ancienne. Bern: 141–55.Google Scholar
Hallett, J. P. (2012) “Authorial identity in Latin love elegy: literary fictions and erotic failings,” in Gold, B. K. (ed.) A Companion to Roman Love Elegy. Malden, Mass.: 269–84.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1997) “Questions of authority: the invention of tradition in Ovid Metamorphoses 15,” in Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A. (eds.) The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge: 182–98.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (2012) Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (1991) “Wrapping up the case: reading Ovid, Amores 2, 7 (+8), I,” MD 27: 37–88.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (1992) “Wrapping up the case: reading Ovid, Amores 2, 7 (+8), II,” MD 28: 27–83.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (2002) “A doo-dah-doo-dah-dey at the races: Ovid Amores 3.2 and the personal politics of the Circus Maximus,” ClAnt 21: 41–65.Google Scholar
Heslin, P. (2011) “Metapoetic pseudonyms in Horace, Propertius and Ovid,” JRS 101: 51–72.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. (2010) “An elegist’s career: from Cynthia to Cornelia,” in Hardie, P. and Moore, H. (eds.) Classical Literary Careers and their Reception. Cambridge: 89–104.Google Scholar
Hill, T. D. (2004) Ambitiosa Mors: Suicide and the Self in Roman Thought and Literature. London.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1998) Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. (2009) “Ovid, Amores 3, 7: a poem between two genres,” Latomus 68: 933–40.Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. (ed. and trans.) (2014) Publius Ovidius Naso: Liebesgedichte/Amores, 2nd edn. Berlin.Google Scholar
Höschele, R. (2011) “Inscribing epigrammatists’ names: Meleager in Propertius and Philodemus in Horace,” in Keith, A. (ed.) Latin Elegy and Hellenistic Epigram. Newcastle upon Tyne: 19–32.Google Scholar
Hübner, W. (2010/11) “Imitazione e emulazione: l’epicedio di Ovidio per Tibullo,” Incontri di filologia classica 10: 171–97.Google Scholar
Huskey, S. J. (2005) “In memory of Tibullus: Ovid’s remembrance of Tibullus 1.3 in Amores 3.9 and Tristia 3.3,” Arethusa 38: 367–86.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2008) Talking Books: Readings in Hellenistic and Roman Books of Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1987) “Linguistics and poetics” (1958), in Pomorska, K. and Rudy, S. (eds.) Language in Literature. Cambridge, Mass.: 62–94.Google Scholar
James, H. (2006) “The poet’s toys: Christopher Marlowe and the liberties of erotic elegy,” MLQ 67: 103–27.Google Scholar
James, S. L. (2003) Learned Girls and Male Persuasion: Gender and Reading in Roman Love Elegy. Berkeley.Google Scholar
James, S. L. (2010) “Ipsa dixerat: women’s words in Roman love elegy,” Phoenix 64: 314–44.Google Scholar
Jansen, L. (2012) “On the edge of the text: preface and reader in Ovid’s Amores,” Helios 39: 1–19.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. R. (1985) “Ringing down the curtain on love: Ovid’s Amores,” Helios 12: 21–8.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. R. (2009) A Latin Lover in Ancient Rome: Readings in Propertius and His Genre. Columbus.Google Scholar
Kaesser, C. (2008) “The mole on the face: erotic rhetoric in Ovid’s Amores,” Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics 100801: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1427346.Google Scholar
Keith, A. (1994) “Corpus eroticum: elegiac poetics and elegiac puellae in Ovid’s Amores,” CW 88: 27–40.Google Scholar
Keith, A. (2009) “Sexuality and gender,” in Knox, P. E. (ed.) A Companion to Ovid. Malden, Mass.: 355–69.Google Scholar
Keith, A. (2015) “Elegiac women and Roman warfare,” in Fabre-Serris, J. and Keith, A. (eds.) Women and War in Antiquity. Baltimore: 138–56.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (1993) The Arts of Love: Five Studies in the Discourse of Roman Love Elegy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (2008) “Elegy and the erotics of narratology,” in Liveley, G. and Salzman-Mitchell, P. (eds.) Latin Elegy and Narratology. Columbus: 19–33.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (2002) “Ovid’s language and style,” in Boyd, B. W. (ed.) Brill’s Companion to Ovid. Leiden: 27–89.Google Scholar
Khan, H. A. (1966) “Ovidius furens: a revaluation of Amores 1, 7,” Latomus 25: 880–94.Google Scholar
Korenjak, M. and Schaffenrath, F. (2012) “Snowmelt in the Alps: Corinna’s tears at Ovid, Amores 1.7.58,” CQ 62: 874–7.Google Scholar
Kronenberg, L. (2016) “Aemilus Macer as Corinna’s parrot in Ovid Amores 2.6,” CPh 111: 264–75.Google Scholar
Laplanche, J. (1976) Life and Death in Psychoanalysis, trans. J. Mehlman. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar
Laplanche, J. and Pontalis, J. B. (1968) “Fantasy and the origins of sexuality,” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 49: 1–19.Google ScholarPubMed
Laskaris, J. (2018) “Ovid’s enchanted ring poem: Amores 2.15,” paper delivered at the Society for Classical Studies Annual Meeting, Boston.Google Scholar
Lateiner, D. (1978) “Ovid’s homage to Callimachus and Alexandrian poetic theory,” Hermes 106: 188–96.Google Scholar
Lejeune, P. (1987) “The autobiographical pact” (1975), in On Autobiography, trans. K. Leary. Minneapolis: 3–30.Google Scholar
McCarthy, K. (1998) “Seruitium amoris/amor seruitii,” in Joshel, S. R. and Murnaghan, S. (eds.) Women and Slaves in Greco-Roman Culture. London: 174–92.Google Scholar
McCarthy, K. (forthcoming) I, the Poet: First-Person Form in Horace, Catullus, and Propertius. Ithaca.Google Scholar
McKeown, J. C. (2002) “The authenticity of Amores 3.5,” in Miller, J. F., Damon, C., and Myers, K. S. (eds.) Vertis in Usum: Studies in Honor of Edward Courtney. Munich: 114–28.Google Scholar
Martin, C. (1994) Policy In Love: Lyric and Public in Ovid, Petrarch and Shakespeare. Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Mathews, G. (2002) “Non aliena tamen: the erotics and poetics of narcissistic sadomasochism in Propertius 1.15,” Helios 29: 27–53.Google Scholar
Mayor, J. M. B. (2017) Power Play in Latin Love Elegy and its Multiple Forms of Continuity in Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Berlin.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. (1991) “Sidney, Petrarch, and Ovid, or imitation as subversion”, ELH 58: 499–522.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. (2004) Subjecting Verses: Latin Love Elegy and the Emergence of the Real. Princeton.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. (2013) “The puella: accept no substitutions!”, in Thorsen (2013a): 166–79.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. (2012) “Elegiac meter: opposites attract,” in Gold, B. K. (ed.) A Companion to Roman Love Elegy. Malden, Mass.: 204–18.Google Scholar
Myers, K. S. (1996) “The poet and the procuress: the lena in Latin love elegy,” JRS 86: 1–21.Google Scholar
Myers, K. S. (2002) “Psittacus redux: Imitation and literary polemic in Statius, Silvae 2.4,” in Miller, J. F., Damon, C., and Myers, K. S. (eds.) Vertis in Usum: Studies in Honor of Edward Courtney. Munich: 189–99.Google Scholar
Myers, K. S. (2010) “Ovid,” Oxford Bibliographies Οnline Research Guide. DOI:10.1093/obo/9780195389661-0039.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. (2004) “The power of image-makers: representation and revenge in Ovid Metamorphoses 6 and Tristia 4,” ClAnt 23: 285–321.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. (forthcoming) “Menelaus’s wound (and Lavinia’s blush),” CQ 69.Google Scholar
Pandey, N. B. (2018) “Caput mundi: female hair as symbolic vehicle of domination in Ovidian love elegy,” CJ 113: 454–88.Google Scholar
Papaioannou, S. (2006) “The poetology of hairstyling and the excitement of hair loss in Ovid, Amores 1, 14,” QUCC 83: 45–69.Google Scholar
Peirano, I. (2013) “Ille ego qui quondam: on authorial (an)onymity,” in Marmadoro, A. and Hill, J. (eds.) The Author’s Voice in Classical and Late Antiquity. Oxford: 251–85.Google Scholar
Perkins, C. A. (1993) “Love’s arrows lost: Tibullan parody in Amores 3.9,” CW 86: 459–66.Google Scholar
Ramsby, T. R. (2007) Textual Permanence: Roman Elegists and the Epigraphic Tradition. London.Google Scholar
Reik, T. (1941) Masochism in Modern Man, trans. M. H. Beigel and G. M. Kurth. New York.Google Scholar
Rimell, V. (2006) Ovid’s Lovers: Desire, Difference, and the Poetic Imagination. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sacher-Masoch, L. von. (1968) Venus im Pelz und Don Juan von Kolomea, ed. Fleskamp, H.. Munich.Google Scholar
Sacher-Masoch, L. (1991) Venus in Furs (1870), trans. A. Willm, in Deleuze, G., Masochism. New York: 143–271.Google Scholar
Salzman-Mitchell, P. (2008) “Snapshots of a love affair: Amores 1.5 and the program of elegiac narrative,” in Liveley, G. and Salzman-Mitchell, P. (eds.) Latin Elegy and Narratology. Columbus: 34–47.Google Scholar
Schmitzer, U. (1994) “Non modo militiae turbine factus eques: Ovids Selbstbewusstsein und die Polemik gegen Horaz in der Elegie Am. 3,15,” Philologus 138: 101–17.Google Scholar
Schmitzer, U. (2013) “Strategien der Selbstkanonisierung bei Ovid,” in Schmitzer, U. (ed.) Enzyklopädie der Philologie: Themen und Methoden der Klassischen Philologie heute. Göttingen: 51–83.Google Scholar
Schrijvers, P. H. (1976) “O tragoedia tu labor aeternus: étude sur l’élégie III, I des Amores d’Ovide,” in Bremer, J. M., Radt, S. L., and Ruijgh, C. J. (eds.) Miscellanea Tragica in Honorem J. C. Kamerbeek. Amsterdam: 405–24.Google Scholar
Seel, O. (1958) “Von Herodot zu Ovid (Ovid, Am. 3, 14 und Herodot, 1, 8, 3),” in Herescu, N. I. (ed.) Ovidiana. Paris: 139–83.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. (1995) “The drooping rose: elegiac failure in Amores 3.7,” Ramus 24: 152–80.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. (2002a) “Gender and sexuality,” in Hardie, P. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Ovid. Cambridge: 95–107.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. (2002b) “Ovid and the discourses of love,” in Hardie, P. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Ovid. Cambridge: 150–62.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. (2012) “Ovid,” in Gold, B. K. (ed.) A Companion to Roman Love Elegy. Malden, Mass.: 70–85.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. (2013) “The poeta-amator, nequitia and recusatio,” in Thorsen, (2013a): 151–65.Google Scholar
Showerman, G. (trans.) (1986) Ovid: Heroides and Amores, 2nd edn., rev. G. P. Goold. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Sinfield, A. (1980) “Sidney and Astrophil,” Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 20: 25–41.Google Scholar
Skoie, M. (2009) “Reading Sulpicia: (em)plotting love,” in Nilsson, I. (ed.) Plotting With Eros: Essays on the Poetics of Love and the Erotics of Reading. Copenhagen: 59–82.Google Scholar
Stapleton, M. L. (1996) Harmful Eloquence: Ovid’s Amores from Antiquity to Shakespeare. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. (1995) “Ovid and the failure of rhetoric,” in Innes, D. C., Hine, H., and Pelling, C. (eds.) Ethics and Rhetoric. Oxford: 63–74.Google Scholar
Thorsen, T. S. (2014) Ovid’s Early Poetry: From his Single Heroides to his Remedia Amoris. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thorsen, T. S. (2016) “Ovid’s Amores 1.5 and the complex of Pompey,” Aevum Antiquum 16: 159–82.Google Scholar
Turpin, W. (2016) Ovid, Amores (Book I). Cambridge (Open Book Publishers) https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0067.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. (1988) Roman Erotic Elegy: Love, Poetry, and the West, trans. D. Pellauer. Chicago.Google Scholar
Weinlich, B. (1999) Ovids Amores: Gedichtfolge und Handlungsablauf. Stuttgart and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1980) “Horace’s liber sermonum: the structure of ambiguity,” Arethusa 13: 59–77.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1983) “Recreating the canon: Augustan poetry and the Alexandrian past,” Critical Inquiry 10: 83–105.Google Scholar
Zgoll, C. (2010) “Crossroads narrative or beauty contest? Role-play in Ovid, Amores 3.1,” Digressus 10: 97–111.Google Scholar
Ziogas, J. (2010) “The permanence of Cupid’s metamorphosis in the Aeneid,” Trends in Classics 2: 150–74.Google Scholar
Zuckerberg, D. (2018) Not All Dead White Men: Classics and Misogyny in the Digital Age. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar