Book contents
- Analgesia, Anaesthesia and Pregnancy
- Analgesia, Anaesthesia and Pregnancy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Section 1 Pre-conception and conception
- Section 2 Pregnancy
- I Procedures in Early and Mid-Pregnancy
- II Normal pregnancy and delivery
- III Operative Delivery and the Third Stage
- IV Anaesthetic problems
- V Problems confined to obstetrics
- VI Problems not confined to obstetrics
- Section 3 Puerperium and after
- Section 4 Organisational issues
- Index
- References
III - Operative Delivery and the Third Stage
from Section 2 - Pregnancy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 April 2019
Book contents
- Analgesia, Anaesthesia and Pregnancy
- Analgesia, Anaesthesia and Pregnancy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Section 1 Pre-conception and conception
- Section 2 Pregnancy
- I Procedures in Early and Mid-Pregnancy
- II Normal pregnancy and delivery
- III Operative Delivery and the Third Stage
- IV Anaesthetic problems
- V Problems confined to obstetrics
- VI Problems not confined to obstetrics
- Section 3 Puerperium and after
- Section 4 Organisational issues
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Analgesia, Anaesthesia and PregnancyA Practical Guide, pp. 97 - 140Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Further reading
Anim-Somuah, M, Smyth, RM, Cyna, AM, Cuthbert, A. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; (5): CD000331.Google ScholarPubMed
Liu, EH, Sia, AT. Rates of caesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery in nulliparous women after low concentration epidural infusions or opioid analgesia: systematic review. BMJ 2004; 328: 1410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Operative Vaginal Delivery. Green-top Guideline 26. London: RCOG, 2011. www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg26 (accessed December 2018).Google Scholar
Further reading
Lucas, DN, Yentis, SM, Kinsella, SM, et al. Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification. J R Soc Med 2000; 93: 346–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Caesarean Section. Clinical Guideline 132. London: NICE, 2004. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg132 (accessed December 2018).Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Royal College of Anaesthetists. Classification of urgency of caesarean section: a continuum of risk. Good Practice 11. London: RCOG, 2010. www.rcog.org.uk/classification-of-urgency-of-caesarean-section-good-practice-11 (accessed December 2018).Google Scholar
Yentis, SM. Whose distress is it anyway? ‘Fetal distress’ and the 30-minute rule. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 732–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Further reading
Arzola, C, Wieczorek, PM. Efficacy of low-dose bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107: 308–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butwick, AJ, Columb, MO, Carvalho, B. Preventing spinal hypotension during Caesarean delivery: what is the latest? Br J Anaesth 2015; 114: 183–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heesen, M, Klöhr, S, Rossaint, R, Straube, S. Prophylactic phenylephrine for caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia 2014; 69: 143–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinsella, SM, Carvalho, B, Dyer, RA, et al. International consensus statement on the management of hypotension with vasopressors during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2018; 73: 71–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langesæter, E, Dyer, RA. Maternal haemodynamic changes during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2011; 24: 242–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Further reading
Allam, J, Malhotra, S, Hemingway, C, Yentis, SM. Epidural lidocaine–bicarbonate–adrenaline vs. levobupivacaine for emergency Caesarean section: a randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 243–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lam, DT, Ngan Kee, WD, Khaw, KS. Extension of epidural blockade in labour for emergency Caesarean section using 2% lidocaine with epinephrine and fentanyl, with or without alkalinisation. Anaesthesia 2001; 56: 790–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucas, DN, Ciccone, GK, Yentis, SM. Extending low-dose epidural analgesia for emergency Caesarean section: a comparison of three solutions. Anaesthesia 1999; 54: 1173–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malhotra, S, Yentis, SM. Extending low-dose epidural analgesia in labour for emergency Caesarean section: a comparison of levobupivacaine with or without fentanyl. Anaesthesia 2007; 62: 667–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanders, SD, Mallory, S, Lucas, DN, et al. Extending low-dose epidural analgesia for emergency caesarean section using ropivacaine 0.75%. Anaesthesia 2004; 59: 988–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Further reading
Dahl, V, Spreng, UJ. Anaesthesia for urgent (grade 1) caesarean section. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2009; 22: 352–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucas, DN, Yentis, SM. Unsettled weather and the end for thiopental? Obstetric general anaesthesia after the NAP5 and MBRRACE-UK reports. Anaesthesia 2015; 70: 375–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sia, AT, Fun, WL, Tan, TU. The ongoing challenges of regional and general anaesthesia in obstetrics. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 24: 303–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Further reading
Algie, CM, Mahar, RK, Tan, HB, et al. Effectiveness and risks of cricoid pressure during rapid sequence induction for endotracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (11): CD011656.Google ScholarPubMed
Benhamou, D, Vanner, R. Controversies in obstetric anaesthesia: cricoid pressure is unnecessary in obstetric general anaesthesia. Int J Obstet Anesth 1995; 4: 30–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Obarney, M, Connolly, L. Rapid sequence induction and intubation: current controversy. Anesth Analg 2010; 110: 1318–25.Google Scholar
Lerman, J. On cricoid pressure: ‘may the force be with you’. Anesth Analg 2009; 109: 1363–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Further reading
Kinsella, SM, Winton, AL, Mushambi, MC, et al. Failed tracheal intubation during obstetric general anaesthesia: a literature review. Int J Obstet Anesth 2015; 24: 356–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mhyre, JM, Healy, D. The unanticipated difficult intubation in obstetrics. Anesth Analg 2011; 112: 648–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mushambi, MC, Kinsella, SM, Popat, M, et al. Obstetric Anaesthetists’ Association and Difficult Airway Society guidelines for the management of difficult and failed tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia 2015; 70: 1286–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, AC, Milne, D, Columb, M, Gorton, H, Knight, M. Failed tracheal intubation in obstetric anaesthesia: 2 yr national case–control study in the UK. Br J Anaesth 2013; 110: 74–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Further reading
Baker, PA, Weller, JM, Greenland, KB, Riley, RH, Merry, AF. Education in airway management. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 101–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, SR, Butler, AR, Parker, J, Cook, TM, Smith, AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in adult patients requiring tracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016 (11): CD011136.Google ScholarPubMed
Popat, MT, Srivastava, M, Russell, R. Awake fibreoptic intubation skills in obstetric patients: a survey of anaesthetists in the Oxford region. Int J Obstet Anesth 2000; 9: 78–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott-Brown, S. Russell, R. Video laryngoscopes and the obstetric airway. Int J Obstet Anesth 2015; 24: 137–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Further reading
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The Management of Third- and Fourth-Degree Perineal Tears. Green-top Guideline 29. London: RCOG, 2015. www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg29 (accessed December 2018).Google Scholar
Further reading
Abdallah, FW, Halpern, SH, Margarido, CB. Transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after caesarean delivery performed under spinal anaesthesia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaes 2012; 109: 679–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carvalho, B, Butwick, AJ. Postcesarean delivery analgesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2017; 31: 69–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mkontwana, N, Novikova, N. Oral analgesia for relieving post-caesarean pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (3): CD010450.Google ScholarPubMed
Wuytack, F, Smith, V, Cleary, BJ. Oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (single dose) for perineal pain in the early postpartum period. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; (7): CD011352.Google ScholarPubMed
Further reading
Corso, E, Hind, D, Beever, D, et al. Enhanced recovery after elective caesarean: a rapid review of clinical protocols, and an umbrella of systematic reviews. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017; 17: 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laronche, A, Popescu, L, Benhamou, D. An enhanced recovery programme after caesarean delivery increases maternal satisfaction and improves maternal-neonatal bonding: a case control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017; 210: 212–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucas, DN, Gough, KL. Enhanced recovery in obstetrics: a new frontier? Int J Obstet Anesth 2013; 22: 92–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Wrench, IJ, Allison, A, Galimberti, A, Radley, S, Wilson, MJ. Introduction of enhanced recovery for elective caesarean section enabling next day discharge: a tertiary centre experience. Int J Obstet Anesth 2015; 24: 124–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed