Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T15:19:29.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Institutional Governance

Factors, Actors, and Consequences of Attempting to Converge on the Anglo–American Model

from Part II - Systems, Processes, and Dynamics of Governance in Higher Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2020

Giliberto Capano
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi, Bologna, Italy
Darryl S. L. Jarvis
Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong
Get access

Summary

This chapter considers the national reforms that all the European governments have continuously designed and implemented. These reforms have been inspired by the same common template — the Anglo-American university governance model, actively promoted by the European Union — but national strategies have clearly interpreted this template according to their inherited legacies, and national reforms have subsequently been elaborated and implemented by the universities’ internal actors — with their power resources, culture, learning abilities — which have acted as ‘filters’ vis-à-vis the planned reforms. Even more importantly, as shown in this chapter, this has meant that the consequences of national reforms of university governance have largely differed from the expected results.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amaral, A., Fulton, O., and Larsen, I. M. (2003) A managerial revolution? In Amaral, A, Meek, V. L, and Larsen, I. M. (Eds), The higher education managerial revolution?, pp. 275296. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Amaral, A., Jones, G., and Karseth, B. (Eds) (2002) Governing higher education: National perspectives on institutional governance. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Berdahl, R. (1990) Academic freedom, autonomy and accountability in British universities. Studies in Higher Education, 15(2), 169180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capano, G. (2011) Government continues to do its job. A comparative study of governance shifts in the higher education sector. Public Administration, 89(4), 16221642.Google Scholar
Capano, G., and Regini, M. (2014) Governance reforms and organizational dilemmas in European universities. Comparative Education Review, 58(1), 73103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capano, G., Regini, M., and Turri, M. (2016) Changing governance in universities: Italian higher education in comparative perspective. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cerych, L., and Sabatier, P. (1986) Great expectations and mixed performance: The implementation of higher education reforms in Europe. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
Clark, B. R. (1983) The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Collins, R. (1979) The credential society: An historical sociology of education and stratification. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
De Boer, H., Enders, J., and Leisyte, L. (2007) Public sector reform in Dutch higher education: The organizational transformation of the university. Public Administration, 85(1), 2746.Google Scholar
Dill, D. (2014) Public policy design and university reform: Insights into academic change. In Musselin, C and Teixeira, P. N. (Eds), Reforming higher education: Public policy design and implementation, pp. 2137. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J., and Powell, W. (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 147160.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2006) Delivering on the modernisation agenda for universities: Education, research and innovation. http://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/pdf/comuniv2006_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., and Andresani, G. (2009) The governance of higher education systems: A public management perspective. In Paradeise, C, Reale, E, Bleiklie, I, and Ferlie, E (Eds), University governance: Western European comparative perspectives, pp. 119. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Hall, P., and Taylor, R. (1996) Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, C. (2000) Paradoxes of public-sector managerialism, old public management and public service bargains. International Public Management Journal, 3(1), 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, C. (1983) The future of industrial societies: Convergence or continuing diversity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kickert, W. (1997) Public governance in the Netherlands: An alternative to Anglo-American managerialism. Public Administration, 75(4), 731752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klijn, E. (2008) Governance and governance networks in Europe. Public Management Review, 10(4), 505525.Google Scholar
Krücken, G., and Meier, J. (2006) Turning the university into an organizational actor. In Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W., and Hwang, H (Eds), Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change, pp. 241257. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J., and Thelen, K. (Eds) (2010) Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power. New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Marini, G., and Reale, E. (2016) How does collegiality survive managerially led universities? Evidence from a European survey. European Journal of Higher Education 6(2), 111127.Google Scholar
Meek, V. L., Goedegebuure, L., Santiago, R., and Carvalho, T. (Eds) (2010) The changing dynamics of higher education middle management. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Merton, R. (1936) The Unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review, 1(6), 894904.Google Scholar
Middlehurst, R. (2004) Changing internal governance: A discussion of leadership roles and management structures in UK universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 58(4), 258279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middlehurst, R. (2013) Changing internal governance: Are leadership roles and management structures in United Kingdom universities fit for the future? Higher Education Quarterly, 67(3), 275294.Google Scholar
Musselin, C. (2006) Are universities specific organizations? In Krücken, G, Kosmützky, A, and Torka, M (Eds), Towards a multiversity? Universities between global trends and national traditions, pp. 6384. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
Musselin, C., and Paradeise, C. (2009) France: From incremental transitions to institutional change. In Paradeise, C, Reale, E, Bleiklie, I, and Ferlie, E (Eds), University governance: Western European comparative perspectives, pp. 2149. Dordrecht: SpringerGoogle Scholar
Musselin, C., and Teixeira, P. (2014) Introduction. In Musselin, C and Teixeira, P. N. (Eds), Reforming higher education: Public policy design and implementation, pp. 117. Dordrecht: SpringerGoogle Scholar
Neave, G. R., and van Vught, F. (1991) Prometheus bound: The changing relationship between government and higher education in Western Europe. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paradeise, C., Reale, E., and Goastellec, G. (2009a) A comparative approach to higher education reforms in Western European countries. In Paradeise, C, Reale, E, Bleiklie, I, and Ferlie, E (Eds), University governance: Western European comparative perspectives, pp. 197225. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Paradeise, C., Reale, E., Goastellec, G., and Bleiklie, I. (2009b) Universities steering between stories and history. In Paradeise, C, Reale, E, Bleiklie, I, and Ferlie, E (Eds), University governance: Western European comparative perspectives, pp. 227246. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Regini, M. (2011) European universities and the challenge of the market. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Regini, M. (2015) Conseguenze non previste delle riforme: i mutamenti della governance universitaria in Europa. Stato e Mercato, 104(2), 159188.Google Scholar
Schimank, U., and Lange, S. (2009) Germany: A latecomer to New Public Management. In Paradeise, C, Reale, E, Bleiklie, I, and Ferlie, E (Eds), University governance: Western European comparative perspectives, pp. 5175. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Schulze-Cleven, T., and Olson, T. (2017) Worlds of higher education transformed: Toward varieties of academic capitalism. Higher Education, 73(6), 813831.Google Scholar
Schwarz, S., and Westerheijden, D. (2004) Accreditation and evaluation in the European higher education area. Dordrecht: KluwerGoogle Scholar
Shattock, M. (2008) The change from private to public governance of British higher education: Its consequences for higher education policy making, 1980–2006. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(3), 181203.Google Scholar
Shattock, M. (2013) University governance, leadership and management in a decade of diversification and uncertainty. Higher Education Quarterly, 67(3), 217233.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1776) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: Strahan and Cadell.Google Scholar
Streeck, W., and Thelen, K. (Eds) (2005) Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trowler, P. R. (2010) UK higher education: Captured by new managerialist ideology? In Meek, V, Goedegebuure, L, Santiago, R, and Carvalho, T (Eds), The changing dynamics of higher education middle management, pp. 197211. Dordrecht: SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Vught, F. (1989) Governmental strategies and innovation in higher education. London: Jessica Kinsley.Google Scholar
Weick, K. F. (1976) Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 119.Google Scholar
Whitley, R. (2000) The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitley, R. (2008) Universities as strategic actors: Limitations and variations. In Engwall, L and Weaire, D (Eds), The university in the market, pp. 2337. London: Portland Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×