Abusch, Dorit. 1997. Sequence of tense and temporal de re. Linguistics and Philosophy, 20(1), 1–50.Google Scholar

Abusch, Dorit. 1998. Generalizing tense semantics for future contexts. Pages 13–33 in Rothstein, S. (ed.), Events and Grammar. Vol. 70 of Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Kluwer.Google Scholar

Albert, David. 2000. Time and Chance. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Anand, Pranav, and Korotkova, Natasha. 2018. Acquaintance content and obviation. Pages 55–72 in Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, vol. 22.Google Scholar

Aronowitz, Sara. 2019. Memory is a modeling system. Mind and Language, 34(4), 483–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aronowitz, Sara, and Lombrozo, Tania. 2020. Learning through Simulation. Philosophers Imprint, 20(1), 1–18.Google Scholar

Asher, Nicholas, and Lascarides, Alex. 2013. Strategic conversation. Semantics and Pragmatics, 6(2), 1–62.Google Scholar

Austin, John Langshaw. 1975. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bacon, Andrew. 2015. Stalnaker’s thesis in context. Review of Symbolic Logic, 8(1), 131–163.Google Scholar

Jackson, Balcerak, Magdalena. 2018. Justification by imagination. Pages 209–226 in Macpherson, Fiona, and Dorsch, Fabian (eds.), Perceptual Imagination and Perceptual Memory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Barnes, Elizabeth, and Cameron, Ross. 2009. The open future: bivalence, determinism and ontology. Philosophical Studies, 146, 291–309.Google Scholar

Barnes, Elizabeth, and Cameron, Ross. 2011. Back to the open future. Philosophical Perspectives, 25(1), 1–26.Google Scholar

Barnes, Elizabeth, and Williams, J. R. G. 2011. A theory of metaphysical indeterminacy. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, 6, 103–148.Google Scholar

Barnes, Eric Christian. 2018. Prediction versus accommodation. In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, fall 2018 ed. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/prediction-accommodationGoogle Scholar

Battaglia, Peter W., Hamrick, Jessica B., and Tenenbaum, Joshua B. 2013. Simulation as an engine of physical scene understanding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(45), 18327–18332.Google Scholar

Beck, Sigrid, and von Stechow, Arnim. 2015. Events, times and worlds: an LF architecture. Pages 13–47 in Fortmann, C., Lübbe, A., and Rapp, I. (eds.), Situationsargumente im Nominalbereich. De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Belnap, Nuel. 1992. Branching space–time. Synthese, 92(3), 385–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belnap, Nuel. 2007. From Newtonian Determinism to Branching Space–Time Indeterminism. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar

Belnap, Nuel. 2012. Newtonian determinism to branching space–times indeterminism in two moves. Synthese, 188(1), 5–21.Google Scholar

Belnap, Nuel, and Green, Mitchell. 1994. Indeterminism and the thin red line. Philosophical Perspectives, 3, 365–388.Google Scholar

Belnap, Nuel, Perloff, Michael, and Xu, Ming. 2001. Facing the Future. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, Jonathan. 2003. A Philosophical Guide to Conditionals. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, Michael, and Partee, Barbara H. 1972. Toward the Logic of Tense and Aspect in English. Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, IN. Reprinted in Partee (2008), pp. 59–109.Google Scholar

Benton, Matthew. 2012. Assertion, knowledge and predictions. Analysis, 72, 102–105.Google Scholar

Benton, Matthew A., and Turri, John. 2014. Iffy predictions and proper expectations. Synthese, 191(8), 1857–1866.Google Scholar

Benton, Matthew A., and Van Elswyk, Peter. 2018. Hedged assertion. Pages 245–264 in Goldberg, Sanford (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Assertion. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Besson, Corine, and Hattiangadi, Anandi. 2014. The open future, bivalence and assertion. Philosophical Studies, 167(2), 251–271.Google Scholar

Bittner, Maria. 2014. Temporality: Universals and Variation. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonomi, Andrea, and Del Prete, Fabio. Evaluating Future-Tensed Sentences in Changing Contexts. Unpublished manuscript, University of Milan.Google Scholar

Borghini, Andrea, and Torrengo, Giuliano. 2013. The metaphysics of the thin red line. Pages 105–125 in: Correia, Fabrice, and Iacona, Andrea (eds.), Around the Tree. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourne, Craig. 2006. A Future for Presentism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Boylan, David. In press a. Does success entail ability? Noûs.Google Scholar

Boylan, David. In press b. What the future “might” brings. Mind.Google Scholar

Boylan, David, and Schultheis, Ginger. In press. The Qualitative Thesis. The Journal of Philosophy.Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert. 1994. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Briggs, R. A., and Forbes, Graeme A. 2012, . The real truth about the unreal future. Pages 257–304 in Bennett, Karen, and Zimmerman, Dean (eds.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, Vol. 7. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Broad, C. D. 1923. Scientific Thought. Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Burgess, John P. 1979. Logic and time. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 44(4), 566–582.Google Scholar

Byrne, Ruth MJ. 2007. The Rational Imagination: How People Create Alternatives to Reality. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Caie, Michael. 2011. Paradox and Belief. PhD thesis, UC Berkeley.Google Scholar

Cameron, Ross. 2015. The Moving Spotlight. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Camp, Elisabeth. 2018. Insinuation, common ground and the conversational record. Pages 40–66 in Fogal, D., Harris, D., and Moss, M. (eds.), New Work on Speech Acts. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cariani, Fabrizio. 2019. Conditionals in selection semantics. Pages 1–10 in Proceedings of the 22nd Amsterdam Colloquium.Google Scholar

Cariani, Fabrizio. 2020. On predicting. Ergo, 7(11), 339–361.Google Scholar

Cariani, Fabrizio. In press. Human Foreknowledge. Philosophical Perspectives.Google Scholar

Cariani, Fabrizio, and Goldstein, Simon. In press. Conditional heresies. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.Google Scholar

Cariani, Fabrizio, and Santorio, Paolo. 2017. Selection semantics for will. Pages 80–89 in Proceedings of the 19th Amsterdam Colloquium.Google Scholar

Cariani, Fabrizio, and Santorio, Paolo. 2018. Will done better: selection semantics, future credence, and indeterminacy. Mind, 127(505), 129–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carruthers, Peter. 1990. What is empiricism? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume, 63–79.Google Scholar

Ciardelli, Ivano. In press. Restriction without quantification: embedding and probability for indicative conditionals. Ergo.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1989. On identifying future tenses. Pages 51–63 in Abraham, Werner, and Janssen, Theo (eds.), Tempus-Aspekt-Modus: die lexicalischen und grammatischen Formen in den germanischen Sprache. Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar

Condoravdi, Cleo. 2002. Temporal interpretation of modals: modals for the present and for the past. Pages 59–88 in Beaver, D., Casillas, L., Clark, B., and Kaufmann, S. (eds.), The Construction of Meaning. CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Condoravdi, Cleo. 2003. Moods and Modalities for Will and Would. Handout from the 14th Amsterdam Colloquium.Google Scholar

Condoravdi, Cleo, and Lauer, Sven. 2011. Performative verbs and performative acts. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 15, 149–164.Google Scholar

Copley, Bridget. 2009. The Semantics of the Future. Routledge.Google Scholar

Crisp, Thomas. 2007. Presentism and the grounding objection. Noûs, 41(1), 90–109.Google Scholar

De Brigard, Felipe. 2014. Is memory for remembering? Recollection as a form of episodic hypothetical thinking. Synthese, 191(2), 155–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeRose, Keith. 1994. Lewis on “might” and “would” counterfactual conditions. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 24(3), 413–418.Google Scholar

DeRose, Keith. 2002. Assertion, knowledge, and context. Philosophical Review, 111(2), 167–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dorr, Cian. 2003. Vagueness without ignorance. Philosophical Perspectives, 17(1), 83–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dorr, Cian, Goodman, Jeremy, and Hawthorne, John. 2014. Knowing against the odds. Philosophical Studies, 170(2), 277–287.Google Scholar

Dorr, Cian, and Hawthorne, John. 2013. Embedding epistemic modals. Mind, 122(488), 867–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dorst, Kevin, and Mandelkern, Matt. Good Guesses. Unpublished manuscript, Oxford University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Douven, Igor. 2006. Assertion, knowledge, and rational credibility. Philosophical Review, 115(4), 449–485.Google Scholar

Douven, Igor. 2009. Assertion, Moore, and Bayes. Philosophical Studies, 144(3), 361–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dowty, David R. 1982. Tenses, time adverbs, compositional semantic theory. Linguistics and Philosophy, 5(1), 23–55.Google Scholar

Dowty, David, Peters, Stanley, and Wall, Robert. 1981. Introduction to Montague Semantics. Springer (Synthese Language Library).Google Scholar

Dummett, Michael. 1959. Truth. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 59(1), 141–62.Google Scholar

Eagle, Anthony. ”Might” Counterfactuals. Unpublished manuscript, University of Adelaide.Google Scholar

Eagle, Anthony. 2019. Chance versus randomness. In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, spring 2019 ed. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/chance-randomness/Google Scholar

Edgington, Dorothy. 1986. Do conditionals have truth-conditions? Critica, 18(52), 3–39.Google Scholar

Egan, Andy, Hawthorne, John, and Weatherson, Brian. 2005. Epistemic modals in context. Pages 131–169 in Preyer, G., and Peter, P. (eds.), Contextualism in Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Enç, Mürvet. 1996. Tense and modality. Pages 345–358 in Lappin, Shalom (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Etchemendy, John. 1990. The Concept of Logical Consequence. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Evans, Gareth. 1978. Can there be vague objects. Analysis, 38(4), 208.Google Scholar

Feeney, Aidan, and Heit, Evan. 2007. Inductive Reasoning: Experimental, Developmental, and Computational Approaches. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

von Fintel, Kai. 1994. Restrictions on Quantifier Domains. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar

von Fintel, Kai. 1997. Bare plurals, bare conditionals and only. Journal of Semantics, 14(1), 1–56.Google Scholar

von Fintel, Kai. 1999. NPI licensing, Strawson entailment, and context dependency. Journal of Semantics, 16(2), 97–148.Google Scholar

von Fintel, Kai, and Gillies, Anthony. 2010. Must … stay … strong! Natural Language Semantics, 18(4), 351–383.Google Scholar

von Fintel, Kai, and Heim, Irene. 2011. Notes on Intensional Semantics. MIT.Google Scholar

von Fintel, Kai, and Iatridou, Sabine. If and when “if”-clauses can restrict quantifiers. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Forbus, Kenneth D. 1983. Qualitative Reasoning about Space and Motion. LEA Associates, Inc.Google Scholar

Frana, Ilaria, and Menéndez-Benito, Paula. 2019. Evidence and bias: the case of the evidential future in Italian. Pages 727–747 in Blake, Katherine, Davis, Forrest, Lamp, Kaelyn, and Rhyne, Joseph (eds.), Semantics and Linguistic Theory, vol. 29.Google Scholar

Frank, Annette. 1997. Context Dependence in Modal Constructions. PhD thesis, University of Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, Jane. 2019. Inquiry and belief. Noûs, 53(2), 296–315.Google Scholar

Garber, Daniel. 1983. Old evidence and logical omniscience in Bayesian confirmation theory. Pages 99–131 in Earman, John (ed.), Testing Scientific Theories. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar

Gerstenberg, Tobias, Goodman, Noah D., Lagnado, David A., and Tenenbaum, Joshua B. 2015. How, whether, why: causal judgments as counterfactual contrasts. CogSci, 1132–1137.Google Scholar

Giannakidou, Anastasia, and Mari, Alda. 2013. The future of Greek and Italian: An evidential analysis. Page 255–270 in Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, vol. 17.Google Scholar

Giannakidou, Anastasia, and Mari, Alda. 2015. Predicting the future in Greek and Italian: objective and subjective dimensions. Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago and Institut Jean Nicod, CNRS.Google Scholar

Giannakidou, Anastasia, and Mari, Alda. 2017. A unified analysis of the future as epistemic modality. Language and Linguistic Theory, 36, 85–129.Google Scholar

Gibbard, Allan. 1981. Two recent theories of conditionals. Pages 211–247 in Harper, William, Stalnaker, Robert C., and Pearce, Glenn (eds.), Ifs. Reidel.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Sanford C. 2015. Assertion: On the Philosophical Significance of Assertoric Speech. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Goldblatt, Robert. 2006. Mathematical modal logic: a view of its evolution. Pages 1–98 in Handbook of the History of Logic, vol. 7. Elsevier.Google Scholar

Goldman, Alvin I. 1967. A causal theory of knowing. Journal of Philosophy, 64(12), 357–372.Google Scholar

Goldman, Alvin I. 1992. In defense of the simulation theory. Mind and Language, 7(1-2), 104–119.Google Scholar

Goldstein, Simon. In press a. Modal Credence. Philosophers’ Imprint.Google Scholar

Goldstein, Simon. In press b. The theory of conditional assertion. Journal of Philosophy.Google Scholar

Green, Mitchell. 1995. Quantity, volubility and some varieties of discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy, 18(1), 83–112.Google Scholar

Green, Mitchell. 2014. On Saying What Will Be. Kluwer.Google Scholar

Green, Mitchell. 2017. Speech acts. In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, winter 2017 ed. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/speech-acts/Google Scholar

Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. Pages 22–40 in Studies in the Ways of Words (1989). Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Grönn, Atle, and von Stechow, Arnim. 2016. Tense. Pages 313–341 in Aloni, M., and Dekker, S. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics, Part III: Temporal and Aspectual Ontology and Other Semantic Structures. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hall, Ned. 1994. Correcting the guide to objective chance. Mind, 103(412), 505–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hawthorne, John. 2005. Chance and counterfactuals. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 70(2), 396–405.Google Scholar

Hawthorne, John, and Lasonen-Aarnio, Maria. 2008. Knowledge and objective chance. In Greenough, Patrick, and Pritchard, Duncan (eds.), Williamson on Knowledge. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hawthorne, John, and Lepore, Ernest. 2011. On words. Journal of Philosophy, 108(9), 447–485.Google Scholar

Higginbotham, James. 1986. Linguistic theory and Davidson’s program in semantics. Pages 29–48 in Lepore, Ernie (ed.), Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hirsch, Eli. 2006. Rashi’s view of the open future: indeterminateness and bivalence. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, 2, 111–135.Google Scholar

Hockett, Charles D., et al. 1960. The origin of speech. Scientific American, 203, 89–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Holguin, Ben. Thinking, Guessing, and Believing. Unpublished manuscript, New York University.Google Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney, and Pullum, Geoff. 2002. Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Iacona, Andrea. 2013. Timeless truth. Pages 29–45 In Correia, Fabrice, and Iacona, Andrea (eds.), Around the Tree. Springer.Google Scholar

Iacona, Andrea. Knowledge of Future Contingents. Unpublished manuscript, Universitá degli Studi di Torino.Google Scholar

Iaquinto, Samuele, and Torrengo, Giuliano. 2018. Filosofia Del Futuro. Raffaello Cortina.Google Scholar

Icard, Thomas F., Kominsky, Jonathan F., and Knobe, Joshua. 2017. Normality and actual causal strength. Cognition, 161, 80–93.Google Scholar

Ippolito, Michela, and Farkas, Donka. 2019. Epistemic stance without epistemic modals: the case of the presumptive future. Pages 459–476 in Blake, Katherine, Davis, Forrest, Lamp, Kaelyn, , and Rhyne, Joseph (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 29. Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar

Jerzak, Ethan. 2019. Non-classical knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 98(1), 190–220.Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird, Philip Nicholas. 1983. Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Jones, Russell E. 2010. Truth and contradiction in Aristotle De Interpretatione 6–9. Phronesis, 55(1), 26–67.Google Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1982. The simulation heuristic. Pages 201–208 in Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Stewart Paul, and Tversky, Amos (eds.), Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kaplan, David. 1989a. Afterthoughts. Pages 565–614 in Almog, J., Perry, J., and Wettstein, H. (eds.), Themes from Kaplan. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kaplan, David. 1989b. Demonstratives. Pages 481–563 in Almog, J., Perry, J., and Wettstein, H. (eds.), Themes from Kaplan. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Karttunen, Lauri, and Peters, Stanley. 1979. Conventional implicature. Pages 1–56 in Oh, Choon-Kyu, and Dinneen, David A. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Volume 11: Presupposition. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, Magdalena, and Kaufmann, Stefan. 2015. Conditionals and modality. Pages 274–312 in Lappin, S. (ed.), The handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Wiley.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, Stefan. 2005. Conditional truth and future reference. Journal of Semantics, 22(3), 231–280.Google Scholar

Kelp, Christoph, and Simion, Mona. 2018. The C account of assertion: a negative result. Synthese, 1–13.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Christopher, and Willer, Malte. 2016. Subjective attitudes and counterstance contingency. Pages 913–933 in Moroney, Mary, Little, Carol-Rose, Collard, Jacob, and Burgdorf, Dan (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 26. Linguistics Society of America.Google Scholar

Khoo, Justin. 2013. A note on Gibbard’s proof. Philosophical Studies, 166(1), 153–164.Google Scholar

Khoo, Justin. 2015. On indicative and subjunctive conditionals. Philosophers Imprint, 15(32), 1–40.Google Scholar

King, Jeffrey. 2003. Tense, modality, and semantic values. Philosophical Perspectives, 17(1), 195–246.Google Scholar

Kissine, Mikhail. 2008. Why will is not a modal. Natural Language Semantics, 16(2), 129–155.Google Scholar

Kissine, Mikhail. 2014. Will, scope and modality: a response to Broekhuis and Verkuyl. Natural Language Semantics, 32(4), 1427–1431.Google Scholar

Klecha, Peter. 2014. Diagnosing modality in predictive expressions. Journal of Semantics, 31(3), 443–455.Google Scholar

Klecha, Peter. 2016. Modality and embedded temporal operators. Semantics and Pragmatics, 9(9), 1–55.Google Scholar

Klinedinst, Nathan. 2011. Quantified conditionals and conditional excluded middle. Journal of Semantics, 28(1), 149–170.Google Scholar

Knuuttila, Simo. 2015. Medieval theories of future contingents. In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, winter 2015 ed. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/medieval-futcont/.Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 1977. What “must” and “can” must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1(3), 337–355. Reprinted with modifications as chapter 1 of Kratzer, Angelika. 2012. Modals and Conditionals. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 1981. The notional category of modality. Pages 289–323 in Partee, B., and Portner, P. (eds.), Formal Semantics: The Essential Readings. Blackwell. Reprinted with modifications as chapter 2 of Kratzer, Angelika. 2012. Modals and Conditionals. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 1991a. Conditionals. Pages 639–650 in von Stechow, D., & Wunderlich, A. (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. De Gruyter. from the Semantics Archive.Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 1991b. Modality. Pages 651–657 in von Stechow, D., & Wunderlich, A. (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. De Gruyter. Reprinted with modifications as chapter 4 of Kratzer, Angelika. 2012. Modals and Conditionals. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 2012. Modals and Conditionals. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 2021. Chasing Hook Quantified indicative conditionals. In Lee, Walters, and Hawthorne, John (eds.), Conditionals, Probability, and Paradox: Themes from the Philosophy of Dorothy Edgington. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul. 1958. Letter to A. N. Prior. Dated Sept. 3, 1958. In The Prior Collection, Bodleian Library, Oxford. Reprinted in Ploug, Thomas, and Øhrstrøm, Peter. 2012. Branching time, indeterminism and tense logic. Unveiling the Kripke– Prior letters. Synthese, 188, 372–375.Google Scholar

Križ, Manuel. 2015. Aspects of Homogeneity in the Semantics of Natural Language. Ph.D. thesis, University of Vienna.Google Scholar

Kroedel, Thomas. 2012. Counterfactuals and the epistemology of modality. Philosophers’ Imprint, 12.Google Scholar

Kvanvig, Jonathan. 2009. Assertion, knowledge, and lotteries. Pages 140–160 in Pritchard, Duncan, and Greenough, Patrick (eds.), Williamson on Knowledge. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lackey, Jennifer. 1999. Testimonial knowledge and transmission. Philosophical Quarterly, 49(197), 471–490.Google Scholar

Lackey, Jennifer. 2007. Norms of assertion. Noûs, 41(4), 594–626.Google Scholar

Lackey, Jennifer. 2008. Learning from Words: Testimony as a Source of Knowledge. Oxford University Press on Demand.Google Scholar

Lackey, Jennifer. 2011 .Measurement and Modality: The Scalar Basis of Modal Semantics. Ph.D. thesis, New York University.Google Scholar

Lackey, Jennifer. 2017. Graded Modality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Leslie, Sarah Jane. 2009. If, unless and quantification. Pages 3–30 in Stainton, R. J., and Viger, C. (eds.), Compositionality, Context and Semantic Values: Essays in Honour of Ernie Lepore. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol. 85. Springer, Netherlands.Google Scholar

Levi, Isaac. 2007. Deliberation does crowd out prediction. In Ronnow-Rasmussen, T., Petersson, F., Joseffson, J., and Egonsson, D. (eds.), Homage à Wlodek. Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Wlodek Rabinowicz. https://www.fil.lu.se/hommageawlodek/site/papper/LeviIsaac.pdfGoogle Scholar

Levin, Janet. 2008. Assertion, practical reason and pragmatic theories of knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 76(2), 359–384.Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1973. Counterfactuals. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1979. Counterfactual dependence and time’s arrow. Noûs, 13(4), 455–476.Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1980. Index, context, and content. Pages 79–100 in Kanger, Stig and Ōhman, Sven (eds.) Philosophy and Grammar. Springer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1986a. On the Plurality of Worlds. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1986b. A subjectivist’s guide to objective chance. Pages 263–293 in Philosophical Papers, vol. II. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1994. Humean supervenience debugged. Mind, 103(412), 473–490.Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1996. Elusive knowledge. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 74(4), 549–567.Google Scholar

Łukasiewicz, Jan. 1970. On determinism. Pages 110–128 in Borkowski, Ł. (ed.), Jan Łukasiewicz: Selected Works. North Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

MacFarlane, John. 2003. Future contingents and relative truth. Philosophical Quarterly, 53, 321–336.Google Scholar

MacFarlane, John. 2005. Making sense of relative truth. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 105, 321–339.Google Scholar

MacFarlane, John. 2008. Truth in the garden of forking paths. Pages 81–102 in Kölbel, M., and Garcia-Carpintero, M. (eds.), Relative Truth. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

MacFarlane, John. 2014. Assessment Sensitivity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Maher, Patrick. 1988. Prediction, accommodation, and the logic of discovery. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1988, 273–285.Google Scholar

Maitra, Ishani. 2011. Assertion, norms, and games. Pages 277–296 in Brown, Jessica, and Cappelen, Herman (eds.), Assertion: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Malpass, Alex, and Wawer, Jacek. 2012. A future for the thin red line. Synthese, 188, 117–142.Google Scholar

Mandelkern, Matthew. 2018. Talking about worlds. Philosophical Perspectives, 32(1), 298–325.Google Scholar

Mandelkern, Matthew. 2019a. Bounded modality. Philosophical Review, 128(1), 1–61.Google Scholar

Mandelkern, Matthew. 2019b. Crises of identity. Pages 279–288 in Proceedings of the 22nd Amsterdam Colloquium.Google Scholar

Mandelkern, Matthew. 2019c. Modality and expressibility. Review of Symbolic Logic, 1–38.Google Scholar

Mandelkern, Matthew. 2019d. What “must” adds. Linguistics and Philosophy, 42(3), 225–266.Google Scholar

Mandelkern, Matthew. In press. If p, Then p! Journal of Philosophy.Google Scholar

Mandelkern, Matthew, Schultheis, Ginger, and Boylan, David. 2017. Agentive modals. Philosophical Review, 126(3), 301–343.Google Scholar

Markosian, Ned. 1995. The open past. Philosophical Studies, 79(1), 95–105.Google Scholar

Matthewson, Lisa. 2015. Evidential restrictions on epistemic modals. Pages 141–160 in Alonso-Ovalle, Luis, and Menendez-Benito, Paula (eds.), Epistemic Indefinites. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

McGee, Vann, and McLaughlin, Brian. 1995. Distinctions without a difference. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 33(S1), 203–251.Google Scholar

Meacham, Christopher J. G. 2010. Two mistakes regarding the Principal Principle. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61(2), 407–431.Google Scholar

Montague, Richard. 1974. Formal Philosophy. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Moss, Sarah. 2013. Epistemology formalized. Philosophical Review, 122(1), 1–43.Google Scholar

Moss, Sarah. 2015. On the semantics and pragmatics of epistemic vocabulary. Semantics & Pragmatics, 8.Google Scholar

Moss, Sarah. 2018. Probabilistic Knowledge. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Murray, Sarah E. 2014. Varieties of update. Semantics and Pragmatics, 7, 2–1.Google Scholar

Ninan, Dilip. 2014. Taste predicates and the acquaintance inference. In Proceedings of the SALT 24.Google Scholar

Ninan, Dilip. 2018. Relational semantics and domain semantics for epistemic modals. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 47(1), 1–16.Google Scholar

Assertion, Evidence, and the Future. Unpublished manuscript, Tufts University.Google Scholar

Normore, Calvin. 1982. Future contingents. Pages 358–381 in Kretzmann, Norman, Kenny, Anthony, and Pinborg, Jan (eds.), Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ogihara, Toshiyuki. 2007. Tense and aspect in truth-conditional semantics. Lingua, 117(2), 392–418.Google Scholar

Øhrstrøm, Peter. 2009. In defence of the thin red line: a case for Ockhamism. Humana. Mente, 8, 17–32.Google Scholar

Øhrstrøm, Peter, and Hasle, Per. 2015. Future contingents. In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, winter 2015 ed. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/future-contingentsGoogle Scholar

Palmer, F. R. 1987. Mood and Modality. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Partee, Barbara H. 1973. Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English. Journal of Philosophy, 601–609.Google Scholar

Partee, Barbara H. 2008. Compositionality in Formal Semantics: Selected Papers. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Pearl, Judea. 2000. Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pearson, Hazel. 2013. A judge-free semantics for predicates of personal taste. Journal of Semantics, 30(1), 103–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ploug, Thomas, and Øhrstrøm, Peter. 2012. Branching time, indeterminism and tense logic. Unveiling the Kripke–Prior letters. Synthese, 188, 367–379.Google Scholar

Portner, Paul. 2007. Imperatives and modals. Natural Language Semantics, 15(4), 351–383.Google Scholar

Portner, Paul. 2009. Modality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Prior, Arthur N. 1957. Time and Modality. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Prior, Arthur N. 1967. Past, Present and Future. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Prior, Arthur N. 1969. Papers on Time and Tense. Clarendon Press. New edition, P. Hasle et al. (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Prior, Arthur N. 1976. It was to be. Pages 97–108 in Geach, Peter, and Kenny, Anthony (eds.), Papers in Semantics and Ethics. Duckworth.Google Scholar

Rescher, Nicholas, and Urquhart, Alasdair. 1971. Temporal Logic, Vol. 3. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar

Rett, Jessica. 2016. On a shared property of deontic and epistemic modals. Pages 200–229 in Charlow, Nate, and Chrisman, Matthew (eds.), Deontic Modality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rips, Lance. 1986. Mental muddles. Pages 258–286 in Brand, Myles, and Harnish, Robert M. (eds.), The Representation of Knowledge and Belief. The University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar

Roberts, Craige. 1989. Modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12(6), 683–721.Google Scholar

Rosenkranz, Sven. 2012. In defence of Ockhamism. Philosophia, 40(3), 617–631.Google Scholar

Santelli, Alessio. In press. Future contingents, branching time, and assertion. Philosophia.Google Scholar

Santorio, Paolo. 2017. Conditional excluded middle in informational semantics. Pages 385–394 in Proceedings of the 21st Amsterdam Colloquium.Google Scholar

Trivializing Informational Consequence. In press, University of Maryland, College Park. In press. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.Google Scholar

Saunders, Simon, and Wallace, D. 2008. Branching and uncertainty. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 59(3), 293–305.Google Scholar

Schacter, Daniel L., Addis, Donna Rose, and Buckner, Randy L. 2007. Remembering the past to imagine the future: the prospective brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(9), 657–661.Google Scholar

Schlenker, Philippe. 2009. Local contexts. Semantics and Pragmatics, 2, 3–1.Google Scholar

Schoubye, Anders J., and Rabern, Brian. 2017. Against the Russellian open future. Mind, 126(504), 1217–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schulz, Katrin. 2010. Troubles at the semantics/syntax interface: some thoughts about the modal approach to conditionals. Pages 388–404 In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, vol. 14.Google Scholar

Schulz, Moritz. 2014. Counterfactuals and arbitrariness. Mind, 123(492), 1021–1055.Google Scholar

Schulz, Moritz. 2017. Counterfactuals and Probability. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Daniel L., and Black, Tamara. 1999. Inferences through imagined actions: knowing by simulated doing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(1), 116.Google Scholar

Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Searle, John R. 1985. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Searle, John R., and Vanderveken, Daniel. 1985. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sennet, Adam. 2016. Polysemy. In Goldberg, Sandy (ed.), Oxford Handbooks Online: Philosophy.Google Scholar

Simion, Mona, and Kelp, Christoph. 2020. Pages 59–74 in constitutive norm view of assertion. In Goldberg, Sandy (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Assertion. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Skow, Brad. 2010. Deep metaphysical indeterminacy. Philosophical Quarterly, 60(241), 851–858.Google Scholar

Sloman, Steven. 2005. Causal Models: How People Think about the World and Its Alternatives. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Spaulding, Shannon. 2016. Simulation theory. Pages 262–273 in Kind, Amy (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Imagination. Routledge.Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan, and Wilson, Deirdre. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Spirtes, Peter, Glymour, Clark, and Scheines, Richard. 2000. Causation, Prediction, and Search. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert. 1968. A theory of conditionals. Studies in Logical Theory, American Philosophical Quarterly, Monograph Series 2, 98–112.Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert. 1976. Indicative conditionals. Philosophia, 5(3), 269–286.Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert. 1978. Assertion. Pages 78–95 in Context and Content. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert. 1981. A defense of conditional excluded middle. Pages 87–104 in Harper, W. L., Pearce, G. A., and Stalnaker, R. (eds.), Ifs. Springer.Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert. 1984. Inquiry. MIT Press (Bradford Books).Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert. 1998. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information (Special Issue on Context in Linguistics and Artificial Intelligence), 7(1). Reprinted in Stalnaker, Robert. 1999. Context and Content. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert. 1999. Context and Content. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert. 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25(5), 701–721.Google Scholar

Stephenson, Tamina. 2007. Judge dependence, epistemic modals, and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30(4), 487–525.Google Scholar

Stojanovic, Isidora. 2014. Talking about the future: unsettled truth and assertion. Pages 26–43 in De Brabanter, Philippe, Kissine, Mikhail, and Sharifzadeh, Saghie (eds.), Future Times, Future Tenses. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stojnić, Una. In press. Content in a dynamic context. Noûs.Google Scholar

Strawson, P. F. 1952. Introduction to Logical Theory. Methuen.Google Scholar

Strohminger, Margot, and Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani. 2019. Knowledge of objective modality. Philosophical Studies, 176(5), 1155–1175.Google Scholar

Sudo, Yasutada. 2012. On the Semantics of Phi Features on Pronouns. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar

Swanson, Eric. 2011. How not to theorize about the language of subjective uncertainty. Pages 249–269 in Egan, Andy, and Weatherson, Brian (eds.), Epistemic Modality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sweeney, Paula. 2015. Future contingents, indeterminacy and context. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 96(3), 408–422.Google Scholar

Szpunar, Karl K. 2010. Episodic future thought: an emerging concept. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(2), 142–162.Google Scholar

Szpunar, Karl K., and McDermott, Kathleen B. 2008. Episodic future thought and its relation to remembering: evidence from ratings of subjective experience. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(1), 330–334.Google Scholar

Thomason, Richmond H. 1970. Indeterminist time and truth-value gaps. Theoria, 18(3), 264–281.Google Scholar

Thomason, Richmond H. 1984. Combinations of tense and modality. Pages 135–165 in Gabbay, D., and Guenthner, F. (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic (Volume II: Extensions of Classical Logic). Springer.Google Scholar

Todd, Patrick. 2016. Future contingents are all false! On behalf of a Russellian open future. Mind, 125(499), 775–798.Google Scholar

Todd, Patrick. 2020. The problem of future contingents: scoping out a solution. Synthese 197, 5051–5072.Google Scholar

Todd, Patrick and Rabern, Brian. In press. Future contingents and the logic of temporal omniscience. Noûs.Google Scholar

Tooley, Michael. 1997. Time, Tense and Causation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Torre, Stephan. 2011. The open future. Philosophy Compass, 6(5), 360–373.Google Scholar

Torza, Alessandro. 2017. Quantum metaphysical indeterminacy and worldly incompleteness. Synthese, 197, 4251–4264.Google Scholar

Tulenheimo, Tero. 2015. Cross-world identity, temporal quantifiers and the question of tensed contents. Pages 409–461 in Torza, Alessandro (ed.), Quantifiers, Quantifiers, and Quantifiers: Themes in Logic, Metaphysics, and Language. Springer.Google Scholar

Unger, Peter K. 1975. Ignorance: A Case for Scepticism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Veltman, Frank. 1996. Defaults in update semantics. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 25, 221–261.Google Scholar

Viebahn, Emanuel. 2018. Ambiguity and zeugma. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 99(4), 749–762.Google Scholar

Stechow, Von, Arnim. 1995. On the proper treatment of tense. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 5.Google Scholar

Weiner, Matthew. 2005. Must we know what we say? The Philosophical Review, 114, 227–251.Google Scholar

Weiner, Matthew, and Belnap, Nuel. 2006. How causal probabilities might fit into our objectively indeterministic world. Synthese, 149(1), 1–36.Google Scholar

Wilensky, Uri, and Rand, William. 2015. An Introduction to Agent-Based Modeling: Modeling Natural, Social, and Engineered Complex Systems with NetLogo. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Willer, Malte, and Kennedy, Chris. 2016 Evidence, Attitudes and Counterstance Contingency. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory XXVI, 913–933.Google Scholar

Willer, Malte, and Kennedy, Chris. In press. Assertion, Expression, Experience. Inquiry.Google Scholar

Williams, John N. 1994. Moorean absurdity and the intentional “structure” of assertion. Analysis, 54(3), 160.Google Scholar

Williams, Robert J. 2008a. Aristotelian Indeterminacy and the Open Future. University of Leeds.Google Scholar

Williams, Robert J. 2008b. Multiple actualities and ontically vague identity. Philosophical Quarterly, 58(230), 134–154.Google Scholar

Williams, Robert J. 2010. Defending conditional excluded middle. Noûs, 44(4), 650–668.Google Scholar

Williams, Robert J. 2000. Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Williams, Robert J. 2008. The Philosophy of Philosophy. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Wilson, Alastair. 2011. Macroscopic ontology in Everettian quantum mechanics. Philosophical Quarterly, 61(243), 363–382.Google Scholar

Wilson, Alastair. 2014. Everettian quantum mechanics without branching time. Synthese, 188, 67–84.Google Scholar

Wilson, Jessica M. 2013. A determinable-based account of metaphysical indeterminacy. Inquiry, 56(4), 359–385.Google Scholar

Winans, Lauren. 2016. Inferences of Will. Ph.D. thesis, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Yalcin, Seth. 2007. Epistemic modals. Mind, 116(4), 983–1027.Google Scholar

Yalcin, Seth. 2010. Probability operators. Philosophy Compass, 916–937.Google Scholar

Yalcin, Seth. 2015. Actually, actually. Analysis, 75(2), 185–191.Google Scholar

Zalta, Edward N. 1987. On the structural similarities between worlds and times. Philosophical Studies, 51(2), 213–239.Google Scholar