Zwicky, F., Morphological Astronomy (Berlin: Springer, 1957). This book made a serious attempt to approach astronomical discovery in a systametic way. Zwicky realized, however, that his effort still was premature. On page 29 he writes, “We cannot … hope to explore here morphologically the whole field of astronomy. We shall have to be satisfied with a demonstration of the new method as applied to limited objectives.”CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmandt, Jurgen, “Scientific Research and Policy Analysis,” editorial in Science 201, no. 4359 (1978).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Granger Morgan, M., “Bad Science and Good Policy Analysis,” editorial in Science 201, no. 4360 (1978).Google Scholar

Michelson, Albert A., Light Waves and Their Uses (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1903), pp. 23–24.Google Scholar

Meissner, Walter, “Max Planck, the Man and His Work” (translated from German) Science 113, no. 75 (1951).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brush, Stephen G., Letter to the Editor in Physics Today, January 1969, p. 9;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Thompson, Silvanus P., The Life of William Thomson, Baron Kelvin of Largs, 2 vols. (London: Macmillan & Co., 1910). The author provides many insights into the nineteenth century physicist’s thoughts and working habits.Google Scholar

Edge, David, “The Sociology of Innovation in Modern Astronomy,” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 18 (1977): p. 327.Google Scholar

Edge, David, “The Sociology of Innovation,” p. 337.Google Scholar

Van Helden, Albert, “The Invention of the Telescope,” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 67 pt. 4 (1977).Google Scholar

Drake, Stillman, Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo (New York: Doubleday & Co., Anchor Books, 1957), p. 21;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Hess, Viktor F., “Über Beobachtungen der durchdringenden Strahlung bei sieben Freiballonfahrten,” Physikalische Zeitschrift 13 (1912): 1084–91.Google Scholar

Jansky, Karl G., “Directional Studies of Atmospherics at High Frequencies,” Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers 20 (1932): 1920–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jansky, Karl G., “Electrical Disturbances Apparently of Extraterrestrial Origin,” Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers 21 (1933): 1387–98.Google Scholar

Burnight, T. R., “Soft X-Radiation in the Upper Atmosphere,” Physical Review 76 (1949): 165.Google Scholar

Purcell, J. D., Tousey, R., and Watanabe, K., “Observations at High Altitudes of Extreme Ultraviolet and X-rays from the Sun,” Physical Review 76 (1949): 165.Google Scholar

Friedman, H., Lichtman, S. W., and Byram, E. T., “Photon Counter Measurements of Solar X-Rays and Extreme Ultraviolet Light,” Physical Review 83 (1951): 1025–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giacconi, R., Gursky, H., Paolini, F., and Rossi, B., “Evidence for X Rays From Sources Outside the Solar System,” Physical Review Letters 9 (1962): 439–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klebesadel, R. W., Strong, I. B., and Olson, R. A., “Observations of Gamma-Ray Bursts of Cosmic Origin,” Astrophysical Journal 182 (1973): L85–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hewish, A, Bell, S. J., Pilkington, J. D. H., Scott, P. F., and Collins, R. A., “Observations of a Rapidly Pulsating Radio Source,” Nature 217 (1968): 709–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edge, David O. and Mulkay, Michael J., Astronomy Transformed—The Emergence of Radio Astronomy in Britain (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1976). Pages 204–13 provide an informed description of the discovery of quasars and early work on them.Google Scholar

Edge, David O. and Mulkay, Michael J., Astronomy Transformed, chap. 10; Edge, David, “The Sociology of Innovation in Modern Astronomy,” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 18 (1977): 330.Google Scholar

Edge and Mulkay, Astronomy Transformed, p. 362.Google Scholar

Edge and Mulkay, Astronomy Transformed, pp. 12–38.Google Scholar

Hey, J. S., “Solar Radiations in the 4–6 Metre Radio Wavelength Band,” Nature 157 (1946): 47–48. German radar antennas in Denmark also detected the sun in 1939–40, but their findings were kept secret as well.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hey, J. S., The Radio Universe (New York: Pergamon Press, 1971), p. 4. The author gives an account of these early observations which arose from spurious radar echoes received in tracking German V–2 rockets toward the end of the war.Google Scholar

Hey, J. S., Parsons, S. J., and Phillips, J. W., “Fluctuations in Cosmic Radiation at Radio- Frequencies,” Nature 158 (1946): 234;.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Van Helden, , “The Invention of the Telescope,” in Koestler, , The Watershed, pp. 185–86.Google Scholar

Merton, Robert K., “Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth Century England,” Osiris 4 (1938): 360–632. Chapter 9 (pp. 543–57) deals with science and military technique. (New York: H. Fertig, 1970).Google Scholar

Strong, I. B. and Klebesadel, R. W., “Cosmic Gamma-Ray Bursts,” Scientific American, October 1976, pp. 66–79A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giacconi, R. in X-Ray Astronomy, edited by Giacconi, R. and Gursky, H. (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel Publishing Co., 1974), p. 7.Google Scholar

Penzias, A. A. and Wilson, R. W., “A Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature at 4080 Mc/s,” Astrophysical Journal 142 (1965): 419–21; Hewish et al., “Observations of a Rapidly Pulsating Radio Source.”CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arp, H., “A Very Small, Condensed Galaxy,” Astrophysical Journal 142 (1965): 402–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Harlan J. and Hoffleit, Dorrit, “Light Variations in the Superluminous Radio Galaxy 3C 273,” Nature 198 (1963): 650–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, Hilary, “How Not to Talk About Meaning—Comments of J. J. C. Smart,” in Boston Studies in the Philosphy of Science, vol. 2, edited by Cohen, R. S. and Wartofsky, M. W., (New York: Humanities Press, 1965), p. 217.Google Scholar

Polanyi, Michael, Personal Knowledge—Toward a Post-Critical Philosophy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958), pp. 110–11.Google Scholar

Polanyi, Michael, Personal Knowledge, p. 351.Google Scholar

Edge, and Mulkay, , Astronomy Transformed, p. 362.Google Scholar

Military Procurement Authorization Act of 1970, Public Law 91–121, Section 203, The Mansfield Amendment, directed that “none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this act may be used to carry out any research project or study unless such project or study has a direct and apparent relationship to a specific military function or operation”; National Academy of Sciences, Astronomy and Astrophysics for the 1970’s—Report of the Astronomy Survey Committee, 2 vols, chaired by Greenstein, Jesse L. (Washington, D.C., 1972).Google Scholar

Bruce Margon, Holland C. Ford, Jonathan I. Katz, Karen B. Kwitter, Roger K. Ulrich, Remington P. Stone, S., and Klemola, Arnold, “The Bizarre Spectrum of SS 433,” Astrophysical Journal 230 (1979): L41–45.Google Scholar

National Science Board, Science Indicators 1976, National Science Foundation, (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1977), pp. 206, 226, 229, and letter from Dr. William E. Howard III of the National Science Foundation, dated May 14, 1980 (author’s file).Google Scholar

Hewish, A., Bell, S. J., Pilkington, J. D. H., Scott, P. F., and Collins, R. A., “Observations of a Rapidly Pulsating Radio Source,” Nature 217 (1968): 709–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gold, T., “Rotating Neutron Stars as the Origin of the Pulsating Radio Sources,” Nature 218 (1968): 731–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).Google Scholar

For an account of this work, see Bessel, , “Ueber Sternschnuppen,” Astronomische Nachrichten 16 (1839): 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whipple, Fred L. and Hawkins, Gerald S. in Handbuch der Physik, vol. 52, edited by Flügge, S., (Berlin: Springer, 1959), p. 559.Google Scholar

Grotrian, W., “Über das Fraunhofersche Spektrum der Sonnenkorona,” Zeitschrift für Astrophysik 8 (1934): 124–46.Google Scholar

Hey, J. S., The Evolution of Radio Astronomy (London: Elek Science, 1973), pp. 19–23;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Schafer, J. P. and Goodall, W. M., “Observations of Kennelly-Heavyside Layer Heights During the Leonid Meteor Shower: November 1931,” Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers 20 (1932): 1941–45.Google Scholar

Skellett, A. M., “The Ionizing Effect of Meteors in Relation to Radio Propagation,” Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers 20 (1932): 1933–40.Google Scholar

Jansky, Karl G., “Electrical Disturbances Apparently of Extraterrestrial Origin,” Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers 21 (1933): 1398.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Woodruff T. III, “A New Look at Karl Jansky’s Original Data,” Sky and Telescope 56, August 1978, pp. 102–3;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Koestler, Arthur, The Watershed—A Biography of Johannes Kepler (New York: Doubleday & Co., Anchor Books, 1959), chap. 6.Google Scholar

Copernicus, Nicolaus, On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres, translated by A. M. Duncan, bk. 1 (New York: Barnes & Noble, 1976), chap. 10.Google Scholar

“A Letter from the Reverend Mr. James Bradley, Savilian Professor of Astronomy at Oxford, and F. R. S. to Dr. Halley, Edmund Astronomer Royal & c. giving an Account of a new discovered Motion of the Fix’d Stars,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 35 (1728): 637–61. Stephen Peter Rigaud, Miscellaneous Works and Correspondence of James Bradley, 1832 (New York: Johnson Reprint Corp., 1972).Google Scholar

Thomson, Thomas, History of the Royal Society from Its Institution to the End of the Eighteenth Century (London: Robert Baldwin, 1812), pp. 345–47.Google Scholar

Pannekoek, A., A History of Astronomy, translated from the 1951 Dutch version (London; George Allen & Unwin, 1951), p. 259.Google Scholar

Herschel, William, “Account of a Comet,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 71 (1781): 492–501.Google Scholar

Mrs. Herschel, John, Memoir and Correspondence of Caroline Herschel (New York: D. Appleton & Co. 1876). This book has many observations by Caroline Herschel on her brother William’s working habits.Google Scholar

Clerke, Agnes M., A Popular History of Astronomy During the Nineteenth Century, 4th ed. (London: Adam & Charles Black, 1902), p. 78; Koestler, The Watershed, p. 184.Google Scholar

Franklin, K. L., “An Account of the Discovery of Jupiter as a Radio Source,” Astronomical Journal 64 (1959): 37–39.Google Scholar

Shapley, Harlow and Howarth, Helen E., A Source Book in Astronomy (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1929), pp. 180–82. This gives a translation of Bode’s 1802 account of the discovery of Ceres.Google Scholar

Clerke, Agnes M., A Popular History of Astronomy, pp. 73–75.Google Scholar

Whitaker, Ewan A., “Galileo’s Lunar Observations, and the Dating of the Composition of Sidereus Nuncius,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 9 (1978): 155–69; Rigaud, Miscellaneous Works of James Bradley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pannekoek, A., A History of Astronomy, pp. 246, 255–56, 278.Google Scholar

Van Helden, A., “Saturn and his Anses,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 5 (1974): 105–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Helden, A., “ ‘Annulo Cingitur,’ The Solution of the Problem of Saturn,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 5 (1974): 155–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riekher, Rolf, Fernrohre und Ihre Meister (Berlin: VEB Verlag Technik, 1957), pp. 50–53.Google Scholar

Elliot, James L., Dunham, Edward, and Millis, Robert L., “Discovering the Rings of Uranus,” Sky and Telescope 53 (June, 1977): 412–16, 430.Google Scholar

International Astronomical Union Circular no. 3338 (Cambridge, Mass., 1979).Google Scholar

Becklin, E. E. and Wynn-Williams, C. G., “Detection of Jupiter’s ring at 2.2 μm,” Nature 279 (1979): 400–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See, for example, Clark, David H. and Richard Stephenson, F., The Historical Supernovae (New York: Pergamon Press, 1977), pp. 21–27.Google Scholar

Dreyer, J. L. E., A History of Astronomy from Thales to Kepler, 2nd ed. (New York: Dover Publications, 1953), p. 366.Google Scholar

Chang, Y. C., “Halley’s Comet: Tendencies in its Orbital Evolution and its Ancient History,” (translated from Acta Astronomica Sinica 19 (1978): 109–18. Chinese Astronomy, 3 (1979): 120–31.Google Scholar

Sarton, George, Six Wings—Men of Science in the Renaissance (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1957), pp. 72–74.Google Scholar

Sir Isaac Newton’s Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy and His System of the World (trans. Andrew Motte, 1729), revised translation by Cajori, Florian, (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1943), p. 596.Google Scholar

Bessel, F. W., “Bestimmung der Entfernung des 61^sten Sterns des Schwans,” Astronomische Nachrichten 16 nos. 365–66 (1838): cols. 65–96;Google ScholarGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Henderson, Thomas, “On the Parallax of α Centauri,” Memoirs of the Royal Astronomical Society London 11 (1840): 61–68. (Read January 3, 1839.) F. G. W. Struve, “Uber die Parallaxe des Sterns α Lyrae nach Micrometermessungen am grossen Refractor der Dorpater Sternwarte,” Astronomische Nachrichten 17 no. 396 (1840): cols. 177–80.Google Scholar

Halley, Edmund, “Considerations on the Change of the Latitudes of some of the principal fixt Stars,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 30 (1718): 736–38.Google Scholar

Herschel, W., “On the Proper Motion of the Sun and Solar System; With an Account of Several Changes that have Happened Among the fixed Stars Since the Time of Mr. Flamsteed,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 73 (1783): 247–83. See also “The Scientific Papers of Sir William Herschel,” vol. 1 (London: Royal Society and Royal Astronomical Society, 1912), pp. 108–30.Google Scholar

Allen, C. W., Astrophysical Quantities, 3rd ed. (London: University of London, Athlone Press, 1973), pp. 234–41.Google Scholar

Henderson, , “On the Parallax of α Centauri,” in Struve, , “Uber die Parallaxe.”Google Scholar

DeVorkin, David H., “Steps Toward the Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram,” Physics Today, March 1978, pp. 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clerke, Agnes M., A Popular History of Astronomy, p. 385.Google Scholar

Sandage, Allan, “Observational Approach to Evolution II. A Computed Luminosity Function for K0-K2 Stars from M_v = +5 to M_v = −4.5,” Astrophysical Journal 125 (1957): 436.Google Scholar

Bethe, H., “Energy Production in Stars,” Physical Review 55 (1939): 434–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodricke, John, “A Series of Observations on, and a Discovery of the Period of the Variation of the Light of the Star Marked 8 by Bayer near the Head of Cepheus,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 76 (1786): 48–61.Google Scholar

Clerke, Agnes M., A Popular History of Astronomy, p. 10.Google Scholar

Leavitt, Henrietta S., Periods of 25 Variable Stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud, Harvard Circular no. 173 (1912). The circular actually appears under the name of Edward C. Pickering, at the time director of the Harvard College Observatory, but the opening sentence is “The following statement regarding the periods of 25 variable stars in the Magellanic Cloud has been prepared by Miss Leavitt.”Google Scholar

Shapley, Harlow, “On the Nature and Cause of Cepheid Variation,” Astrophysical Journal 40 (1914): 448–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eddington, A. S., “On the Pulsations of Gaseous Stars and the Problem of the Cepheid Variables,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 79 (1918): 2–22; (1919): 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bessel, F. W., Letter to Herschel, Sir J. F. W., “On the Variations of the Proper Motions of Procyon and Sirius,” August 10, 1844, translated and reprinted in part in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 6 (1844): 136–41.Google Scholar

Clerke, Agnes M., A Popular History of Astronomy, pp. 41–42.Google Scholar

Clerke, Agnes M., A Popular History of Astronomy, p. 465. The author attributes the first sizable reflecting telescope to H. Draper. It was finished in 1870. Its aperture was 28 inches.Google Scholar

Adams, Walter S., “The Spectrum of the Companion of Sirius,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 27 (1915): 236–37.Google Scholar

Gingerich, Owen, “Abbé Lacaille’s List of Clusters and Nebulae,” Sky and Telescope 19 (February 1960): 207–208.Google Scholar

Bailey, S. I., “The Periods of the Variable Stars in the Cluster Messier 5,” Astrophysical Journal 10 (1899): 255–65.Google Scholar

Shapley, Harlow, Through Rugged Ways to the Stars (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1969), chap. 4.Google Scholar

Herschel, William, “On Nebulous Stars, properly so called,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 81 (1791): 71–88. See also “The Scientific Papers of Sir William Herschel,” vol. 1 p. 421–22.Google Scholar

Kirchhoff, Gustav and Bunsen, Robert, “Chemical Analysis by Spectrum-observations,” Philosophical Magazine 4th Series 20 (1860): 89–109.Google Scholar

Huggins, William, “On the Spectra of Some of the Chemical Elements,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 154 (1864): 139–60.Google Scholar

Huggins, William and Miller, W. A., “On the Spectra of Some of the Fixed Stars,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 154 (1864): 413–35.Google Scholar

Huggins, William, “ ‘On the Spectra of Some of the Nebulae,’ ” A Supplement to the Paper “ ‘On the Spectra of Some of the Fixed Stars’ ” by Huggins, William and Miller, W. A., Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 154 (1864): 437–44.Google Scholar

Lynds, C. R., “Observations of Planetary Nebulae at Centimeter Wavelengths,” Publications of the National Radioastronomy Observatory 1 (1961): 85–97.Google Scholar

Isobe, Syuzo, “H-Beta Observation of the Barnard Loop,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 30 (1978): 499–506.Google Scholar

Huggins, William, “On the Spectrum of the Great Nebula in the Sword-Handle of Orion,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 14 (1865): 39–42.Google Scholar

Kardashev, N. S., “On the Possibility of Detection of Allowed Lines of Atomic Hydrogen in the Radio-Frequency Spectrum,” Soviet Astronomy, A. J. 3 (1960): 813–20. This is a translation from the original article in Russian in Astronomicheskii Zhurnal 36 (1959): 838–44.Google Scholar

Haddock, F. T., Mayer, C. H, and Sloanaker, R. M.,” Radio Emission from the Orion Nebula and Other Sources at λ9.4 cm,” Astrophysical Journal 119 (1954): 456–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartmann, J., “Investigations of the Spectrum and Orbit of δ Orionis,” Astrophysical Journal 19 (1904): 268–86.Google Scholar

Pannekoek, A., A History of Astronomy, p. 451.Google Scholar

Clerke, Agnes M., A Popular History of Astronomy, p. 406.Google Scholar

Ewen, H. I. and Purcell, E. M., “Radiation from Galactic Hydrogen at 1,420 Mc./sec,” Nature 168 (1951): 356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conversation with Purcell, E. M., in Ithaca, New York, April 9, 1979.Google Scholar

van de Hulst, H. C., “Radiogolven Uit Het Wereldruim II. Herkomst der radiogolven,” Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Natuurkunde 11 (1945): 210–21.Google Scholar

Muller, C. A. and Oort, J. H., “The Interstellar Hydrogen Line at 1,420 Mc./sec, and an Estimate of Galactic Rotation,” Nature 168 (1951): 357–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKellar, rew, “Evidence for the Molecular Origin of Some Hitherto Unidentified Interstellar Lines,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 52 (1940): 187–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rank, D. M., Townes, C. H., and Welch, W. J., “Interstellar Molecules and Dense Clouds,” Science 174 (1971): 1083–1101.Google Scholar

Townes, C. H., “Microwave and Radio-Frequency Resonance Lines of Interest to Radio Astronomy” in Radio Astronomy, International Astronomical Union Symposium no. 4, edited by van de Hulst, H. C. (Cambridge, England, 1957), pp. 92–103.Google Scholar

Barnard, E. E., “On the Dark Markings of the Sky—With a Catalogue of 182 Such Objects,” Astrophysical Journal 49 (1919): 1–23, 360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trumpler, Robert J., “Absorption of Light in the Galactic System,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 42 (1930): 214–27.Google Scholar

Hiltner, W. A., “Polarization of Light From Distant Stars by Interstellar Medium,” Science 109 (1949): 165;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Slipher, V. M., “The Spectrum of NGC 7023,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 30 (1918): 63–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brahe, Tycho, Astronomiae Instauratae Progymnasmata, in The Historical Supernovae, chap. 3, translated and quoted by David H. Clark and F. Richard Stephenson (New York: Pergamon Press, 1977), p. 174.Google Scholar

Clark, David H. and Richard Stephenson, F., The Historical Supernovae, p. 83.Google Scholar

Clark, and Stephenson, , The Historical Supernovae, pp. 25–26.Google Scholar

Baade, W. and Zwicky, F., “On Super-Novae,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 20 (1934): 254–59.Google ScholarPubMed

Jones, Kenneth Glyn, “S Andromedae, 1885: An Analysis of Contemporary Reports and a Reconstruction,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 7 (1976): 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoskin, M. A., “Ritchey, Curtis and the Discovery of Novae in Spiral Nebulae,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 7 (1976): 47–53; G. W. Ritchey, “Novae in Spiral Nebulae,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 29 (1917): 210–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapley, H., “Note on the Magnitudes of Novae in Spiral Nebulae,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 29 (1917): 213–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berendzen, R. and Hart, R., “Adriaan van Maanen’s Influence on the Island Universe Theory,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 4 (1973): 46–56, 73–98. The authors have discussed these observations by the astronomer van Maanen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapley, Harlow, Through Rugged Ways.Google Scholar

Baade, Walter, Evolution of Stars and Galaxies, edited by Payne-Gaposchkin, Cecilia, (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1963), pp. 30–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark and Stephenson, The Historical Supernovae, p. 53.Google Scholar

Strohmeier, W., Variable Stars (New York: Pergamon Press, 1972).Google Scholar

Joy, Alfred H., “T Tauri Variable Stars,” Astrophysical Journal 102 (1945): 168–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herbig, George H., “The Spectra of Two Nebulous Objects Near NGC 1999,” Astrophysical Journal 113 (1951): 697–99;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Clerke, Agnes M., A Popular History of Astronomy, p. 403.Google Scholar

Lampland, C. O., “Observed Changes in the Structure of the ‘Crab’ Nebula (NGC 1952),” Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 33 (1921): 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neugebauer, G. and Leighton, R. B., “Two-Micron Sky Survey,” National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA SP-3047 (Washington, D.C., 1969).Google Scholar

Neugebauer, and Leighton, , “Two-Micron Sky Survey”; Neugebauer, G., Martz, D. E., and Leighton, R. B., “Observations of Extremely Cool Stars,” Astrophysical Journal 142 (1965): 399–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luyten, W. J., “A New Star of Large Proper Motion, (L726–8),” Astrophysical Journal 109 (1949): 532–37.Google Scholar

In a letter to the author from Luyten, W. J., April 1, 1979.Google Scholar

Lovell, A. C. B., Whipple, F. L., and Solomon, L. H., “Radio Emission From Flare Stars,” Nature 198 (1963): 228–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hey, J. S., “Solar Radiations in the 4–6 Meter Radio Wavelength Band,” Nature 157 (1946): 47–48;Google ScholarGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Hey, J. S., “Solar Radiations.”Google Scholar

Hale, George E., “The Earth and Sun as Magnets,” Smithsonian Report for 1913, pp. 145–58, reprinted in part in H. Shapley, Source Book in Astronomy 1900–1950 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1960), pp. 32–35.Google Scholar

A telephone conversation with Babcock, H. W., April 16, 1979.Google Scholar

Babcock, H. W., “Zeeman Effect in Stellar Spectra,” Astrophysical Journal 105 (1947): 105–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weaver, H., Williams, D. R. W., Dieter, N. H., and Lum, W. T., “Observations of a Strong Unidentified Microwave Line and of Emission from the OH Molecule,” Nature 208 (1965): 29–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weinreb, S., Barrett, A. H., Meeks, M. L., and Henry, J. C., “Radio Observations of OH in the Interstellar Medium,” Nature 200 (1963): 829–31; S. Weinreb, M. L. Meeks, J. C. Carter, A. H. Barrett, and A. E. E. Rogers, “Observations of Polarized OH Emission,” Nature 208 (1965): 440–41; R. D. Davies, G. de Jager, and G. L. Verschuur, “Detection of Circular and Linear Polarization in the OH Emission of Sources Near W3 and W49,” Nature 209 (1966): 974–77; R. D. Davies, B. Rowson, R. S. Booth, A. J. Cooper, H. Gent, R. L. Adgie, and J. H. Crowther, “Measurements of OH Emission Sources With an Interferometer of High Resolution,” Nature 213 (1967): 1109–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrett, A. H. and Lilley, A. E., “A Search for the 18-cm Line of OH in the Interstellar Medium,” Astronomical Journal 62 (1957): 5–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

A telephone conversation with Barrett, Allan H., May 11, 1979.Google Scholar

A variety of accounts, not all of them consistent, have been given of this discovery. Hewish, Anthony has given one account in his Nobel Prize lecture “Pulsars and High Density Physics” reprinted in Science 188 (1975): 1079–83. Another report in the same journal is by Nicholas Wade, “Discovery of Pulsars: A Graduate Student’s Story,” Science 189 (1975): 358–64. Much of the controversy has surrounded the credit awarded to Bell or Hewish. There does not, however, seem to be any doubt about Bell’s persistence in following up a hunch that her “bit of scruff” was something that required explaining. She has written her own good-natured account: S. Jocelyn Bell Burnell, “Little Green Men, White Dwarfs or What?” Sky and Telescope 55 (March 1978): 218–21.Google Scholar

Rossi, Bruno in X-ray Astronomy, edited by Giacconi, R. and Gursky, H. (Dordrecht-Holland: Reidel Publishing Co., 1974), p. vii.Google Scholar

Two internal publications, both dated January 15, 1960, from American Science and Engineering Corporation (Cambridge, Mass.) record these activities. ASE-TN-49 “A Brief Review of Experimental and Theoretical Progess in X-Ray Astronomy” by R. Giacconi, G. W. Clark, and B. B. Rossi; and ASE-TN-50 “Instrumentation for X-Ray Astronomy” by R. Giacconi and G. W. Clark. The quotation comes from the first of these.Google Scholar

Giacconi, R., Gursky, H., Paolini, F. R., and Rossi, Bruno B., “Evidence for X Rays from Sources Outside the Solar System,” Physical Review Letters 9 (1962): 439–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giacconi, Riccardo in X-ray Astronomy, p.10Google Scholar

Friedman, Herbert, “Rocket Astronomy,” Scientific American 200, June 1959, pp. 57, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rossi, Bruno, “X-ray Astronomy,” Daedalus 106 (Fall 1977), p. 40.Google Scholar

Rossi, Bruno, “X-ray Astronomy,” pp. 40–41.Google Scholar

A telephone conversation with Herbert Friedman, May 14, 1979.Google Scholar

Giacconi, Clark, Rossi, “A Brief Review of Experimental and Theoretical Progress”; Giacconi, and Clark, “Instrumentation for X-ray Astronomy.”Google Scholar

Gregory, P. C., Kronberg, P. P., Seaquist, E. R., Hughes, V. A., Woodsworth, A., Viner, M. R., Retallack, D., Hjellming, R. M., and Balick, B., “The Nature of the First Cygnus X-3 Radio Outburst,” Nature, Physical Science 239 (1972): 114–17; E. E. Becklin, G. Neugebauer, F. J. Hawkins, K. O. Mason, P. W. Sanford, K. Matthews, and C. G. Wynn-Williams, “Infrared and X-ray Variability of Cyg X-3,” Nature 245 (1973): 302–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duyvendak, J. J. L., “Further Data Bearing on the Identification of the Crab Nebula with the Supernova of 1054 a.d., Part 1. The Ancient Oriental Chronicles,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 54 (1942): 91–94;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Duncan, John C., “Changes Observed in the Crab Nebula in Taurus,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 7 (1921): 179–80; “Second Report on the Expansion of the Crab Nebula,” Astrophysical Journal 89 (1939): 482–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lampland, “Observed Changes in the Crab Nebula.”Google Scholar

Mayall, N. U., “The Spectrum of the Crab Nebula in Taurus,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 49 (1937): 101–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayall, N. U., “The Story of the Crab Nebula,” Science 137 (1962): 91–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bolton, J. G. and Stanley, G. J., “The Position and Probable Identification of the Source of Galactic Radio-Frequency Radiation Taurus-A,” Australian Journal of Scientific Research Ser. A., 2 (1949): 139–48; J. H. Oort and T. Walraven, “Polarization and Composition of the Crab Nebula,” Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of the Netherlands 12 (1956): 285–308; W. Baade, “The Polarization of the Crab Nebula on Plates Taken with the 200-Inch Telescope,” Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of the Netherlands 12 (1956): 312. The work by Oort and Walraven also refers to the earlier observations by Vashakidze and Dombrovsky.Google Scholar

Bowyer, S., Byram, E., Chubb, T., and Friedman, H., “Lunar Occultation of X-ray Emission from the Crab Nebula,” Science 146 (1964): 912–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fermi, Enrico, “On the Origin of the Cosmic Radiation,” Physical Review 75 (1949): 1169–174.Google Scholar

Davis, L. Jr. and Greenstein, J. L., “The Polarization of Starlight by Aligned Dust Grains,” Astrophysical Journal 114 (1951): 206–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alfven, H. and Herlofson, N., “Cosmic Radiation and Radio Stars,” Physical Reveiw 78 (1950): 616; K. O. Kiepenheuer, “Cosmic Rays as the Source of General Galactic Radio Emission,” Physical Review 79 (1950): 738–39.Google Scholar

Shklovsky, I. S., Cosmic Radio Waves, trans. R. B. Rodman and C. M. Varsavsky (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1960), pp. 292–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, C. H., McCullough, T. P., and Sloanaker, R. M., “Evidence for Polarized Radio Radiation from the Crab Nebula,” Astrophysical Journal 126 (1957): 468–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verschuur, G. L., “Further Measurements of Magnetic Fields in Interstellar Clouds of Neutral Hydrogen,” Nature 223 (1969): 140–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manchester, R. N., “Pulsar Rotation and Dispersion Measures and the Galactic Magnetic Field,” Astrophysical Journal 172 (1972): 43–52.Google Scholar

Parsons, William, 3rd earl of Rosse, “Observations on the Nebulae,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 140 (1850): 499–514.Google Scholar

Duncan, John C., “Three Variable Stars and a Suspected Nova in the Spiral Nebula M 33 Trianguli,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 34 (1922): 290–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hubble, E. P., “Cepheids in Spiral Nebulae,” Observatory 48 (1925): 139–42.Google Scholar

Baade, Walter, Evolution of Stars and Galaxies, chap. 8.Google Scholar

Oort, J. H., “Observational Evidence Confirming Lindblad’s Hypothesis of a Rotation of the Galactic System,” Bulletin of the Astronomical Institute of The Netherlands 3 (1927): 275–82.Google Scholar

Mayall, N. U., “The Occurrence of λ 3727 [Oll] in the Spectra Extragalactic Nebulae,” Publications of the Society of the Pacific 51 (1939): 282–86.Google Scholar

Kerr, F. J., Hindman, J. V., and Robinson, B. J., “Observations of the 21-cm Line from the Magellanic Clouds,” Australian Journal of Physics 7 (1954): 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hubble, Edwin, “The Distribution of Extra-Galactic Nebulae,” Astrophysical Journal 79 (1934): 8–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herschel, John, “Catalogue of Nebulae and Clusters of Stars; Part 1,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 154 (1864): 1–137.Google Scholar

Buttman, Günther, The Shadow of the Telescope: A Biography of John Herschel, trans. B. E. J. Pagel (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1970), pp. 96–97.Google Scholar

Herschel, William, “On the Construction of the Heavens,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 75 (1785): 213–66. The Scientific Papers of Sir William Herschel, The Royal Society, London (1912), Vol. I, p. 253.Google Scholar

Jansky, Karl G., “Electrical Disturbances,” pp. 1387–98.Google Scholar

Hey, J. S., Parsons, S. J., and Phillips, J. W., “Fluctuations in Cosmic Radiation at Radio-Frequencies,” Nature 158 (1946): 234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Smith, F. G., Little, C. G., and Lovell, A. C. B., “Origin of the Fluctuations in the Intensity of Radio Waves from Galactic Sources,” Nature 165 (1950): 422–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baade, W. and Minkowski, R., “Identification of the Radio Sources in Cassiopeia, Cygnus A and Puppis A., Astrophysical Journal 119 (1954): 206–14.Google Scholar

Kellermann, K. I., “Radio Emission from Compact Objects,” in External Galaxies and Quasi-Stellar Objects, International Astronomical Union Symposium no. 44, edited by Evans, David S. (Dordrecht-Holland: Reidel Publishing Co., 1972), pp. 190–213.Google Scholar

Kristian, J., Sandage, A., and Katem, B., “On the Systematic Optical Identification of the Remaining 3C Radio Sources. I. A Search in 47 Fields,” Astrophysical Journal 191 (1974): 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, B. J., “QSOs and Radio Galaxies—Their Spectra and Time Variations at Radio Frequencies,” in External Galaxies and Quasi-Stellar Objects, International Astronomical Union Symposium no. 44, edited by Evans, David S. (Dordrecht-Holland: Reidel Publishing Co., 1972), pp. 232–48.Google Scholar

The list of forty-one galaxies is published in a paper by Stromberg, G., “Analysis of Radial Velocities of Globular Clusters and Non-Galactic Nebulae,” Astrophysical Journal 61 (1925): 353–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hubble, Edwin, The Realm of the Nebulae (New York: Dover Publications, 1958), pp. 105–6.Google Scholar

Hubble, Edwin, “A Relation Between Distance and Radial Velocity Among Extra-Galactic Nebulae,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 15 (1929): 168–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wirtz, C., “De Sitters Kosmologie und die Radialbewegungen der Spiralnebel,” Astronomische Nachrichten 222 (1924): 21–26; W. de Sitter, “On Einstein’s Theory of Gravitation, and its Astronomical Consequences,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 78 (1917): 3–28; in particular the discussion on pp. 27–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Humason, M. L., “The Apparent Radial Velocities of 100 Extra-Galactic Nebulae,” Astrophysical Journal 83 (1936): 10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hazard, C., Mackey, M. B., and Shimmins, A. J., “Investigation of the Radio Source 3C 273 by the Method of Lunar Occultations,” Nature 197 (1963): 1037–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edge, David O. and Mulkay, Michael J., Astronomy Transformed—The Emergence of Radio Astronomy in Britain (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1976), pp. 204–208.Google Scholar

Edge, David O. and Michael J. Mulkay, Astronomy Transformed, p. 206.Google Scholar

Schmidt, M., “3C 273: A Star-Like Object with a Large Red-Shift,” Nature 197 (1963): 1040.Google Scholar

Greenstein, Jesse L. and Matthews, Thomas A., “Red-Shift of the Unusual Radio Source: 3C 48,” Nature 197 (1963): 1041–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

A report on this meeting appeared in Sky and Telescope 21 (March 1961): 148. A copy of the original draft paper was kindly sent to me by Dr. Matthews.Google Scholar

From a personal interview with Cyril Hazard, August 13, 1979.Google Scholar

Allen, L. R., Palmer, H. P., and Rowson, B., “New Limits to the Diameters of Some Radio Sources,” Nature 188 (1960): 731–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandage, Allan, “The Existence of a Major New Constituent of the Universe: The Quasi-Stellar Galaxies,” Astrophysical Journal 141 (1965): 1560–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rees, M. J., “Appearance of Relativistically Expanding Radio Sources,” Nature 211 (1966): 468–70; M. J. Rees, “Studies in Radio Source Structure—I. A Relativistically Expanding Model for Variable Quasi-Stellar Radio Sources,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 135 (1967): 345–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knight, C. A., Robertson, D. S., Rogers, A. E. E., Shapiro, I. I., Whitney, A. R., Clark, T. A., Goldstein, R. M., Marandino, G. E., and Vandenberg, N. R., “Quasars: Millisecond-of- Arc Structure Revealed by Very-Long-Baseline Interferometry,” Science 172 (1971): 52–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

A telephone conversation with Irvin I. Shapiro, July 19, 1979.Google Scholar

Cotton, W. D., Counselman III, C. C., Geller, R. B., Shapiro, I. I., Wittels, J. J., Hinteregger, H. F., Knight, C. A., Rogers, A. E. E., Whitney, A. R., and Clark, T. A., “3C 279: The Case for ‘Superluminal’ Expansion,” Astrophysical Journal 229 (1979): L115–17; G. A. Seielstad, M. H. Cohen, R. P. Linfield, A. T. Moffet, J. D. Romney, R. T. Schilizzi, and D. B. Shaffer, “Further Monitoring of the Structure of Superluminal Radio Sources,” Astrophysical Journal 229 (1979): 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gubbay, J., Legg, A. J., Robertson, D. S., Moffet, A. T., Ekers, R. D., and Seidel, B., “Variations of Small Quasar Components at 2,300 MHz,” Nature 224 (1967): 1094–95. The D. S. Robertson cited here is David S. Robertson, and the D. S. Robertson mentioned in reference 170 is Douglas S. Robertson. I am indebted to Prof. I. I. Shapiro for pointing that out to me.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moffet, A. T., Gubbay, J., Robertson, D. S., and Legg, A. J., “High Resolution Observations of Variable Radio Sources,” in External Galaxies and Quasi-Stellar Objects, International Astronomical Symposium no. 44, edited by Evans, David S. (Dordrecht-Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Co. and New York: Springer-Verlag, 1972), pp. 228–29.Google Scholar

A telephone conversation with A. T. Moffet, September 4, 1979.Google Scholar

Shapiro conversation, July 19, 1979.Google Scholar

Byram, E. T., Chubb, T. A., Friedman, H., “Cosmic X-Ray Sources, Galactic and Extragalactic,” Science 152 (1966): 66–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Johnson, Harold L., “Infrared Photometry of Galaxies,” Astrophysical Journal 143 (1966): 187–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becklin, E. E. and Neugebauer, G., “Infrared Observations of the Galactic Center,” Astrophysical Journal 151 (1968): 145–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffmann, William F. and Frederick, Carl L., “Far-Infrared Observation of the Galactic-Center Region at 100 Microns,” Astrophysical Journal 155 (1969): L9–L13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kleinmann, D. E. and Low, F. J., “Observations of Infrared Galaxies,” Astrophysical Journal 159 (1970): L165–72; G. H. Rieke and F. J. Low, “Infrared Photometry of Extragalactic Sources,” Astrophysical Journal 176 (1972): L95–100.Google Scholar

Klebesadel, Ray W., Strong, Ian B., and Olson, Roy A., “Observations of Gamma-Ray Bursts of Cosmic Origin,” Astrophysical Journal 182 (1973): L85–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Letter from R. W. Klebesadel to author.Google Scholar

McKellar, rew, “Evidence for the Molecular Origin of Some Hitherto Unidentified Interstellar Lines,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 52 (1940): 187–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, Walter S., “Some Results with the Coudé Spectrograph of the Mount Wilson Observatory,” Astrophysical Journal 93 (1941): 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herzberg, Gerhard, Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure I. Spectra of Diatomic Molecules, 2nd ed. (New York: Van Nostrand, 1950), p. 496.Google Scholar

Penzias, A. A. and Wilson, R. W., “A Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature at 4080 Mc/s,” Astrophysical Journal 142 (1965): 419–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gamow, G., “Expanding Universe and the Origin of Elements,” Physical Review 70 (1946): 572–73; Ralph A. Alpher and Robert C. Herman, “Remarks on the Evolution of the Expanding Universe,” Physical Review 75 (1949): 1089–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dicke, R. H., Peebles, P. J. E., Roll, P. G., and Wilkinson, D. T., “Cosmic Black-Body Radiation,” Astrophysical Journal 142 (1965): 414–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Penzias, and Wilson, , “A Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature.”Google Scholar

Penzias, Arno A. in Cosmology, Fusion and Other Matters—George Gamow Memorial Volume, edited by Reines, Frederick, (New York: Colorado Associated University Press, 1972), pp. 32–34.Google Scholar

Weinberg, Steven, The First Three Minutes (New York: Basic Books, 1977). See chapter 6 for a discussion of this question. Robert H. Dicke, Robert Beringer, Robert L. Kyhl, and A. B. Vane, “Atmospheric Absorption Measurements with a Microwave Radiometer,” Physical Review 70 (1946): 340–48.Google Scholar

Hey, J. S., The Evolution of Radio Astronomy (London: Elek Science, 1973), p. 174; Gamow, “Expanding Universe.”Google Scholar

Alpher, and Herman, , “Remarks on the Expanding Universe.”Google Scholar

Ohm, E. A., “Project Echo Receiving System,” Bell System Technical Journal 40 (1961): 1065–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jakes, W. C. Jr., “Participation of the Holmdel Station in the Telstar Project,” Bell System Technical Journal 42 (1963): 1424. I am indebted to Professor J. R. Pierce for forwarding to me a copy of a letter to him by David C. Hogg, dated January 3,1979. Hogg, a participant of this project carried out at a 4GHz frequency, calls attention to the roughly 2.5 degree-Kelvin discrepancy between the measured noise of 17 degrees Kelvin and all other calculated sources of noise, roughly 14.5 degrees Kelvin, which included the by-then-known atmospheric contribution, as well as instrumental noise contributions.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

A conversation in Ithaca, New York, with Robert H. Dicke, November 13, 1978, and a letter, dated November 20, 1978.Google Scholar

Giacconi, et al., “Evidence for X Rays.”Google Scholar

Friedman, Herbert has recounted these events in a set of personal recollections, “Rocket Astronomy,” New York Academy of Sciences, Annals 198 (1972): 271–72. There he also records that he and James E. Kupperian, Jr. reported on this radiation at the 1958 International Astronomical Union Assembly in Moscow.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, G. W., Garmire, G. P., and Kraushaar, W. L., “Observation of High-Energy Cosmic Gamma Rays,” Astrophysical Journal 153 (1968): L203–7.Google Scholar

The Caravane Collaboration for the COS-B Satellite consists of the Cosmic-Ray Working Group, Huygens Laboratorium, Leiden, The Netherlands; Laboratorio di Fisica Cosmica e Tecnologie Relative del CNR, Instituto di Scienze Fisische dell’Università di Milano, Italy; Instituto Fisica, Università di Palermo, Italy; Max Planck Insistut für Physik und Astrophysik, Institut für Extraterrestrische Physik, Garching bei München, Germany; Service d’Electronique Physique, Centre d’Etudes Nucléaires de Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France; Space Science Department of the European Space Agency, ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands.Google Scholar

Wilson, C. T. R., “On the Ionisation of Atmospheric Air,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 68 (1900): 151–61.Google Scholar

Carson, John R., “Notes on the Theory of Modulation,” Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers 10 (1922): 57–64.Google Scholar

Nyquist, Harry, “Certain Factors Affecting Telegraph Speed,” Bell System Technical Journal 3 (1924): 324–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gabor, D., “Theory of Communication,” Journal of the Institute of Electrical Engineers 93, Part III (1946): 429–57.Google Scholar

Willard Gibbs, J., Elementary Principles in Statistical Mechanics (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1902; New York: Dover Publications, 1960), p. 5.Google Scholar

Cruddace, R., Paresce, F., Bowyer, S., and Lampton, M., “On the Opacity of the Interstellar Medium to Ultrasoft X-rays and Extreme-Ultraviolet Radiation,” Astrophysical Journal 187 (1974): 497–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robert, J. Gould and Yoel Rephaeli, “The Effective Penetration Distance of Ultrahigh-Energy Electrons and Photons Traversing a Cosmic Blackbody Photon Gas,” Astrophysical Journal 225 (1978): 318–24.Google Scholar

de Vaucouleurs, Gérard, Astronomical Photography (New York: Macmillan Co., 1961), pp. 34, 72; J. C. Marchant and A. G. Millikan, “Photographic Detection of Faint Stellar Objects,” Journal of the Optical Society of America 55 (1965): 907–11; Allan G. Millikan, “Image Detection at the Telescope,” American Scientist 62 (1974): 324–33; Rolf Riekher, Fernrohre und ihre Meister (Berlin: VEB Verlag, 1957); Jesse L. Greenstein, “Astronomical Implications of Future Very Large Telescopes,” in ESO Conference on Optical Telescopes of the Future, Geneva, December 12–15, 1977, edited by F. Pacini, W. Richter and R. N. Wilson (February 1978), p. 534; William Kitchiner, M. D., Of Telescopes (London: Whittaker, 1825).Google Scholar

Bessel, , “Fernere Nachricht von der Bestimmung der Enterfernung von 61 Cygni,” Astronomische Nachrichten 17 no. 402 (1840) cols. 273–76;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Shannon, Claude E., “A Mathematical Theory of Communication,” Bell System Technical Journal 27 (1948) 379–423, 623–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harwit, Martin, “The Number of Class A Phenomena Characterizing the Universe,” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 16 (1975): 378–409.Google Scholar

Colgate, Stirling A., “Early Gamma Rays From Supernovae,” Astrophysical Journal 187 (1974): 333–35.Google Scholar

Rots, A. H. and Shane, W. W., “Distribution and Kinematics of Neutral Hydrogen in the Spiral Galaxy M81,” Astronomy and Astrophysics 45 (1975): 25–42.Google Scholar

Oliver, B. M., “The Rationale for a Preferred Frequency Band: The Water Hole” in The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence—SETI, edited by Morrison, Philip, Billingham, John, and Wolfe, John, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA SP-419 (Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1977), pp. 63–74.Google Scholar

Philip Morrison, John Billingham, and John Wolfe, The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence—SETI.Google Scholar

Bernard, Claude, An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine, 1865, reprint, trans. Henry Copley Greene (New York: Henry Schuman, Inc., 1949).Google Scholar

A conversation in Tucson Arizona, with Frank J. Low, March 27, 1980; and a telephone conversation April 9, 1980.Google Scholar

Lovell, Sir Bernard, “The Effects of Defense Science on the Advance of Astronomy,” Journal for the History of Science 8 (1977): 151–73.Google Scholar

Pannekoek, A., A History of Astronomy (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1951), p. 246.Google Scholar

“A Letter from the Reverend Mr. James Bradley, Savilian Professor of Astronomy at Oxford, and F. R. S. to Dr. Halley, Edmund, Astronomer Royal & c. giving an Account of a new discovered Motion of the Fix’d Stars,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 35 (1728): 637–61.Google Scholar

Mrs. Herschel, John, Memoir and Correspondence of Caroline Herschel (New York: D. Appleton & Co., 1876), pp. 36, 53.Google Scholar

Landau, L. D., “On the Theory of Stars,” Physikalische Zeitschrift der Sowjetunion, 1, 285–288 (1932); W. Baade and F. Zwicky, “Cosmic Rays from Super-Novae,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 20 (1934): 259–63; J. R. Oppenheimer and G. M. Volkoff, “On Massive Neutron Cores,” Physical Review 55 (1939): 374–81.Google Scholar

Sheldon, Eric, “A Champion to the Rescue of Laplace,” Observatory 99 (1979): 91–93. Sheldon’s letter gives a modern evaluation of Pierre-Simon Laplace’s contribution which originally appeared in Exposition du Système du Monde, vol. 2 (Paris: l’Imprimerie du Cercle-Social, 1796), p. 305.Google Scholar

Oppenheimer, J. R. and Snyder, H., “On Continued Gravitational Contraction,” Physical Review 56 (1939): 455–59.Google Scholar

Merton, Robert K., “Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth Century England,” Osiris 4 (1938): 360–632. Chapter 9 (pp. 543–57) deals with science and military technique. (New York: H. Fertig, 1970.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, David H. and Richard Stephenson, F., The Historical Supernovae (New York: Pergamon Press, 1977), chap. 2.Google Scholar

Lovell, , “The Effects of Defense Science on the Advance of Astronomy.”Google Scholar

Martin Annis, telephone conversation September 8, 1978.Google Scholar

National Academy of Sciences, Committee on Science and Public Policy, Employment Problems in Astronomy—Report of the Astronomy Manpower Committee (Washington, D.C., March 1975). This study, chaired by Leo Goldberg, director of the Kitt Peak National Observatory, drew heavily on data compiled by the American Institute of Physics and the National Science Foundation and provides further references to these and other studies of manpower problems of astronomy.Google Scholar

Edge, David, “The Sociology of Innovation in Modern Astronomy,” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 18 (1977): 329.Google Scholar

Huggins, William and Huggins, Lady, eds., The Scientific Papers of Sir William Huggins (London: William Wesley & Son, 1909), pp. 5–6. Excerpted from The Nineteenth Century Review (June 1897).Google Scholar

Philip Morrison in National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Space Science Board, “Opportunities and Choices in Space Science, 1974” (Washington, D.C.: NASA, 1975), pp. 21–22.Google Scholar

McGinnis, Robert and Singh, Vijai P., “Three Types of Mobility and their Covariation among Physicists” (Paper presented to the American Sociological Association, August 1972).Google Scholar

Edge, David O. and Mulkay, Michael J., Astronomy Transformed—The Emergence of Radio Astronomy in Britain (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1976), pp. 359–64.Google Scholar

Aeronautics, National and Administration, Space, Committee, Physical Science, “Report on NASA’s Office of Space Science, Supporting Research and Technology and Data Analysis Programs,” chaired by Field, George B., (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, May 1976).Google Scholar

Jonathan, R. Cole and Stephen Cole, “Which Researcher Will Get the Grant?” Nature 279 (1979): 575–76.Google Scholar

Zuckerman, Harriet, Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States (New York: The Free Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Blume, Stuart S., “Peer Review in the NSF,” Nature 278 (1979): 807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, and Cole, , “Which Researcher Will Get the Grant?”Google Scholar

Orbach, Raymond, “Basic Research: The Need for Lateral Movement” editorial in Science 205, no. 4402 (1979).Google Scholar

Carl Leopold, A., “The Burden of Competitive Grants,” editorial in Science 203, no. 4381 (1979).Google Scholar

Carter, Luther J., “A New and Searching Look at NSF,” Science 204 (1979): 1064–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Staats, Elmer B., “Federal Research Grants—Maintaining Public Accountability without Inhibiting Creative Research,” Science 205 (1979): 18–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bessel, F. W., “Bestimmung der Entfernung des 61^sten Sterns des Schwans,” Astronomische Nachrichten 16 nos. 365–66 (1838): cols. 65–96.Google Scholar

Bessel, F. W., “Fernere Nachricht von der Bestimmung der Entfernung des 61^sten Sterns des Schwans,” Astronomische Nachrichten 17, no. 401 (1840): cols. 257–72.Google Scholar

Howard, William E. III, Memorandum to the Astronomy Advisory Committee of the National Science Foundation and Directors of the National Astronomy Centers, April 13, 1978, p. AST: 4/3/78 LRP (3). I thank Dr. Howard for providing me with a copy of this memorandum. (See also Physics Today, March 1978, pp. 103–4).Google Scholar

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Jahrbuch, 1979 (Munich), p. 119.Google Scholar

Lust, Reimar, “Wie die MPG Forschung lebendig hält,” MPG Spiegel, nos. 3, 4 (1979), pp. 56–57, (a publication of the Max Planck Society of West Germany). The translation given here is my own—M. H.Google Scholar

Kitt Peak National Observatory, Next Generation Telescope. A design study conducted at the Kitt Peak National Observatory, published by KPNO as a series of reports (1977–79).Google Scholar

Hall, D. N., Learner, R. C. M., and Barr, L. D., Next Generation Telescope, Astronomical Potential and Scientific Uses for a Large Aperture Optical Telescope. Report no. 1 (Tucson, Arizona: Kitt Peak National Observatory, 1977), p. 3.Google Scholar

Spitzer, Lyman Jr., “History of the Space Telescope,” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, London, 20 (1979): 29–36; M. S. Longair, “The Space Telescope and Its Opportunities,” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, London, 20 (1979): 5–28.Google Scholar

“The VLA Takes Shape,” Sky and Telescope, 52 (November 1976).Google Scholar

Kazarian, Ralph, “World’s Most Powerful Radio Telescope Ready for Use by Scientists,” National Science Foundation News Release, NSF PR 78–15, February 20, 1978.Google Scholar

Oliver, B. M. in The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence—SETI, edited by Morrison, Philip, Billingham, John and Wolfe, John, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA SP–419 (Washington, D.C., 1977), pp. 136–37.Google Scholar

Giacconi, R. et al. “The Einstein (HEAO-2) X-Ray Observatory,” Astrophysical Journal 230 (1979): 540–50.Google Scholar

Reines, Frederick, “The Early Days of Experimental Neutrino Physics,” Science 203 (1979): 11–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Weinberg, Steven, The First Three Minutes (New York: Basic Books, 1977), p. 118.Google Scholar

Bahcall, John N., “Solar Neutrino Experiments,” Reviews of Modern Physics 50 (1978): 881–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bahcall, J. N., Cleveland, B. T., Davis, R. Jr., Dostrovsky, L., Evans, J. C. Jr., Frati, W., Friedlander, G., Lande, K., Rowley, J. K., Stoenner, R. W., and Weneser, J., “Proposed Solar–Neutrino Experiment Using ⁷¹Ga,” Physical Review Letters 40 (1978): 1351–54; “Solar-Neutrino Hunters Still Seek Explanation,” Physics Today, December 1978, p. 20.Google Scholar

Eichler, David, “Deep-Sea Neutrinos,” Nature 276 (1978): 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anthony Tyson, J. and Giffard, R. P., “Gravitation-Wave Astronomy,” Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 16 (1978): 521–54.Google Scholar

Mashhoon, Bahram, “On the Detection of Gravitational Radiation by the Doppler Tracking of Spacecraft,” Astrophysical Journal, 227 (1979): 1019–36.Google Scholar

National Aeronautics and Space Administration, “Astrophysics Project Concept Summary: Gravity Wave Interferometer,” 1978–261–371:11 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, March 1978).Google Scholar

Edge, David O. and Michael J. Mulkay, Astronomy Transformed, p. 437.Google Scholar

National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Ground Based Astronomy, A Ten Year Program—A Report Prepared by the Panel on Astronomical Facilities, Committee on Science and Public Policy of the National Academy of Sciences, chaired by Whitford, A. E. (Washington, D.C., 1964), p. 74.Google Scholar

National Academy of Sciences: Astronomy and Astrophysics for the 1970’s—Volume 1, Report of the Astronomy Survey Committee, 2 vols., chaired by Greenstein, Jesse L. (Washington, D.C., 1972), l:xiii–xiv.Google Scholar

Astronomy and Astrophysics for the 1970’s, 1: 8–9.Google Scholar

A private discussion with Professor Jesse Greenstein, December 11, 1978, at Cal Tech.Google Scholar

Astronomy and Astrophysics for the 1970’s.Google Scholar

Greenstein conversation, December 11, 1978.Google Scholar

National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Physics in Perspective, 3 vols., chaired by Allan Bromley, D., vol. 2, pt. B, “The Interfaces,” chap. 8 (Washington, D.C., 1972–73), pp. 749–848.Google Scholar

National Academy of Sciences: Astronomy and Astrophysics for the 1970’s.—Report of the Panels, 2 vols., chaired by Greenstein, Jesse L., (Washington, D.C., 1973), 2:282–83; National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Physics in Perspective, 3 vols., chaired by D. Allan Bromley, vol. 1, vol. 2A, “The Core Subfields of Physics”; vol. 2B, “The Interfaces.” (Washington, D.C., 1972–1973).Google Scholar

National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Physics in Perspective, 1:381–453.Google Scholar

Fisher, R. A., Corbet, A. S., and Williams, C. B., “The Relation Between the Number of Species and the Number of Individuals in a Random Sample of an Animal Population,” Journal of Animal Ecology 12 (1943): 42–58.Google Scholar

Goodman, L. A., “On the Estimation of the Number of Classes in a Population,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 20 (1949): 572–79; I. J. Good, “The Population Frequencies of Species and the Estimation of Population Parameters,” Biometrika 40 (1953): 237–64.Google Scholar

Robbins, H. E., “Estimating the Total Probability of the Unobserved Outcomes of an Experiment,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 39 (1968): 256–57; H. W. Menard and G. Sharman, “Scientific Uses of Random Drilling Models,” Science 190 (1975): 337–43.Google Scholar

Efron, B. and Thisted, R., “Estimating the Number of Unseen Species: How Many Words Did Shakespeare Know?” Biometrika 63 (1976): 435–47.Google Scholar

Shannon, Claude E., “A Mathematical Theory of Communication,” Bell System Technical Journal 27 (1948): 379–423, 623–56. Reprint ed. C. E. Shannon and W. Weaver (Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 1949); Gordon Raisbeck, Information Theory—An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers, (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1964). This gives clear explanations for several theoretical concepts discussed in this appendix. R. V. L. Hartley, “Transmission of Information,” Bell System Technical Journal 7 (1928): 535–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raisbeck, , Information Theory.Google Scholar