Angeli, C., Voogt, J., Fluck, A., Webb, M., Cox, M., Malyn-Smith, J., & Zagami, J. (2016). A K–6 computational thinking curriculum framework: Implications for teacher knowledge. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 47–57.Google Scholar

Astrachan, O., & Briggs, A. (2012). The CS principles project. ACM Inroads, 3(2), 38–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 90(4), 449–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 373–397.Google Scholar

Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.Google Scholar

Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K–12: What is Involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48–54.Google Scholar

Begle, E. G. (1979). Critical Variables in Mathematics Education: Findings from a Survey of the Empirical Literature. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.Google Scholar

Bransford, J. D., & Donovan, M. S. (2005). Scientific inquiry and how people learn. In M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How Students Learn: History, Mathematics, and Science in the Classroom (pp. 397–420). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar

Brown, N. C., & Altadmri, A. (2017). Novice Java programming mistakes: Large-scale data vs. educator beliefs. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 17(2), 7.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1977). The Process of Education (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Byrne, C. J. (1983). Teacher knowledge and teacher effectiveness: A literature review, theoretical analysis and discussion of research strategy. Paper presented at the meeting of the Northwestern Educational Research Association, Ellenville, NY.Google Scholar

Cochran-Smith, M. (1995). Color blindness and basket making are not the answers: Confronting the dilemmas of race, culture, and language diversity in teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 493–522.Google Scholar

Cole, M. (2006). The Fifth Dimension: An After-School Program Built on Diversity. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Cole, M., & Engestrom, Y. (2007). Cultural–historical approaches to designing for development. In Valsiner, J. & Rosa, A. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology (pp. 484–506). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Computer Science Teachers Association (2017). K–12 Computer Science Standards. Retrieved from www.csteachers.org/page/standardsGoogle Scholar

Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1–42.Google Scholar

Denton, J. J., & Lacina, L. J. (1984). Quantity of professional education coursework linked with process measures of student teaching. Teacher Education and Practice, 1, 39–64.Google Scholar

Eglash, R., Gilbert, J. E., & Foster, E. (2013). Toward culturally responsive computing education. Communications of the ACM, 56(7), 33–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eglash, R., Gilbert, J. E., Taylor, V., & Geier, S. R. (2013). Culturally responsive computing in urban, after-school contexts: Two approaches. Urban Education, 48(5), 629–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., Jacobs, V. R., & Empson, S. B. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children’s thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 403–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferguson, P., & Womack, S. T. (1993). The impact of subject matter and on teaching performance. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(1), 55–63.Google Scholar

Gay, G. (2010). Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Granor, N., DeLyser, L. A., & Wang, K. (2016). Teals: Teacher professional development using industry volunteers. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (pp. 60–65). New York: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43.Google Scholar

Guyton, E., & Farokhi, E. (1987). Relationships among academic performance, basic skills, subject matter knowledge, and teaching skills of teacher education graduates. Journal of Teacher Education, 38(5), 37–42.Google Scholar

Hristova, M., Misra, A., Rutter, M., & Mercuri, R. (2003). Identifying and correcting Java programming errors for introductory computer science students. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 35(1), 153–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchins, E. (1995). How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science, 19, 265–288.Google Scholar

K–12 Computer Science Framework (2016). K–12 Computer Science Framework. Retrieved from www.k12cs.orgGoogle Scholar

Kafai, Y., Searle, K., Martinez, C., & Brayboy, B. (2014). Ethnocomputing with electronic textiles: Culturally responsive open design to broaden participation in computing in American Indian youth and communities. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 241–246). New York: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leont’ev, A. N. (1932). Studies in the cultural development of the child, 3: The development of voluntary attention in the child. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 37, 52–81.Google Scholar

Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In Wertsch, J. V. (Ed.), The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology (pp. 37–71). White Plains, NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar

Luria, A. R. (1928). The problem of the cultural development of the child. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 35, 506.Google Scholar

Luria, A. R. (1932). The Nature of Human Conflicts. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar

Margolis, J., Estrella, R., Goode, J., Jellison Holme, J., & Nao, K. (2008). Stuck in the Shallow end: Education, Race, and Computing. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Margolis, J., Goode, J., Chapman, G., & Ryoo, J. J. (2014). That classroom “magic”. Communications of the ACM, 57(7), 31–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, A., McAlear, F., & Scott, A. (2015). Path Not Found: Disparities in Access to Computer Science Courses in California High Schools. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED561181.pdfGoogle Scholar

Milner IV, H. R. (2015). Rac(e)ing to Class: Confronting Poverty and Race in Schools and Classrooms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar

Monk, D. H. (1994). Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 13(2), 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

National Research Council (2005). How Students Learn: Science in the Classroom. Washington, DC: Committee on How People Learn.Google Scholar

National Research Council (2010). Report of a Workshop on the Scope and Nature of Computational Thinking. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar

National Research Council (2011). Report of a Workshop on the Pedagogical Aspects of Computational Thinking. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar

National Research Council (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar

Perkes, V. A. (1967). Junior high school science teacher preparation, teaching behavior, and student achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 5(2), 121–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ryoo, J., Goode, J., & Margolis, J. (2015). It takes a village: Supporting inquiry- and equity-oriented computer science pedagogy through a professional learning community. Computer Science Education, 25(4), 351–370.Google Scholar

Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Coyle, H. P., Cook-Smith, N., & Miller, J. L. (2013). The influence of teachers’ knowledge on student learning in middle school physical science classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1020–1049.Google Scholar

Scott, K. A., Sheridan, K. M., & Clark, K. (2015). Culturally responsive computing: A theory revisited. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(4), 412–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.Google Scholar

Smith, T. M., Desimone, L. M., & Ueno, K. (2005). “Highly qualified” to do what? The relationship between NCLB teacher quality mandates and the use of reform-oriented instruction in middle school mathematics. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(1), 75–109.Google Scholar

Turkle, S., & Papert, S. (1990). Epistemological pluralism: Styles and voices within the computer culture. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 16(1), 128–157.Google Scholar

Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Good, J., Mishra, P., & Yadav, A. (2015). Computational thinking in compulsory education: Towards an agenda for research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 715–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1929). The problem of the cultural development of the child, II. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 36, 415–34.Google Scholar

Vygotksy, L. S. (1960). The Development of Higher Psychological Functions. Moscow, Russia: Izdael’stov Akademii Pedagogicheskikh Nauk, in Russian.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Zhang, J., & Patel, V. L. (2006). Distributed cognition, representation, and affordance. Pragmatics & Cognition, 14(2), 333–341.Google Scholar

Abell, S. K., Rogers, M., Park, A., Hanuscin, D. L., Lee, M. H., & Gagnon, M. J. (2009). Preparing the next generation of science teacher educators: A model for developing PCK for teaching science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(1), 77–93.Google Scholar

Anderson, G. L., & Page, B. (1995). Narrative knowledge and educational adminstration: The stories that guide our practice. In Donmoyer, R., Imber, M. & Scheurich, J. J. (Eds.), The Knowledge Base in Educational Administration: Multiple Perspectives (pp. 124–135). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Bell, B., & Gilbert, J. (1996). Teacher Development: A Model from Science Education. London, UK: Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Benner, P. A. (1996). Impediments to the development of clinical knowledge and ethical judgement in critical nursing care. In Tanner, C. A. & Chesla, C. A. (Eds.), Expertise in Nursing Practice: Caring, Clinical Judgement, and Ethics (pp. 171–198). New York: Springer Publishing Co.Google Scholar

Ben-Peretz, M. (2011). Teacher knowledge: What is it? how do we uncover it? what are its implications for schooling? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 3–9.Google Scholar

Bereiter, C. (2014). Principled practical knowledge: Not a bridge but a ladder. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(1), 4–17.Google Scholar

Berliner, D. C. (2001). Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 463–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berry, A., Friedrichsen, P. J., & Loughran, J. (Eds.) (2015). Re-Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Education. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bransford, J., Darling-Hammond, L., & LePage, P. (2005). Introduction. In Darling-Hammond, L. & Bransford, J. (Eds.), Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and Be Able to Do, 1st edn. (pp. 1–39). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Buchholz, M., Saeli, M., & Schulte, C. (2013). PCK and reflection in computer science teacher education. In Proceedings of the 8th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (pp. 8–16). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Bullough, R. V. (2001). Pedagogical content knowledge circa 1907 and 1987: A study in the history of an idea. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(6), 655–666.Google Scholar

Cameron, D. J. (2016). The Effectiveness of a Learning Community in Bringing About Changes to Instructional Practices in the Area of Assessment for Learning (PhD thesis). University of Calgary.Google Scholar

CAS (2018). Computing at school. Retrieved from www.computingatschool.org.ukGoogle Scholar

Cordingley, P., Higgins, S., Greany, T., Buckler, N., Coles-Jordan, D., Crisp, B., … Coe, R. (2015). Developing Great Teaching: Lessons from the International Reviews into Effective Professional Development. London, UK: Teacher Development Trust.Google Scholar

Cranston, J., & Kusanovich, K. (2015). Learning to lead against the grain: Dramatizing the emotional toll of teacher leadership. Issues in Teacher Education, 24(2), 63–78.Google Scholar

Crehan, L. (2016). Cleverlands: The Secrets Behind the Success of the World’s Most Celebrated Education Systems. New York: Unbound/Random House.Google Scholar

Cutts, Q., Robertson, J., Donaldson, P., & O’Donnell, L. (2017). An evaluation of a professional learning network for computer science teachers. Computer Science Education, 27(1), 30–53.Google Scholar

Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–309.Google Scholar

Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Teacher learning: What matters? Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46–53.Google Scholar

Depaepe, F., Verschaffel, L., & Kelchtermans, G. (2013). Pedagogical content knowledge: A systematic review of the way in which the concept has pervaded mathematics educational research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 12–25.Google Scholar

Dogan, S., Pringle, R., & Mesa, J. (2016). The impacts of professional learning communities on science teachers’ knowledge, practice and student learning: A review. Professional Development in Education, 42(4), 569–588.Google Scholar

Downes, T., Fluck, A., Gibbons, P., Leonard, R., Matthews, C., Oliver, R., … Department of Education, Science and Training (2001). Making Better Connections: Models of Teacher Professional Development for the Integration of Information and Communication Technology into Classroom Practice. Canberra, Australia: Australian Curriculum Studies Association, Australian Council for Computers in Education, Technology Education Federation of Australia, University of Western Sydney.Google Scholar

DuFour, R. (2004). What is a professional learning community? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6–11.Google Scholar

European Commission – Education and Training (2013). Education and Training Monitor. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/assets/eac/education/library/publications/monitor13_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

Even, R. (1999). The development of teacher leaders and inservice teacher educators. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2(1), 3–24.Google Scholar

Falkner, K., Vivian, R., Falkner, N., & Williams, S. (2017). Reflecting on three offerings of a community-centric MOOC for K–6 computer science teachers. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 195–200). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Feiler, R., Heritage, M., & Gallimore, R. (2000). Teachers leading teachers. Educational Leadership, 57(7), 66–69.Google Scholar

Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson Study: A Japanese Approach to Improving Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Mahwah, NJ; London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Fincher, S. (2008). Sharing practice. Retrieved from www.sharingpractice.ac.ukGoogle Scholar

Fincher, S. (2012). Using narrative methodology. University of Kent at Canterbury. Retrieved from https://kar.kent.ac.uk/32059/Google Scholar

Fincher, S., & Tenenberg, J. (2005). Disciplinary commons, overview page. Retrieved from www.disciplinarycommons.orgGoogle Scholar

Fincher, S., & Tenenberg, J. (2007). Warren’s question. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Computing Education Research (pp. 51–60). New York: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (Eds.) (1999). Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The Construct and Its Implications for Science Education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands; London, UK: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar

Go, S., & Dorn, B. (2016). Thanks for sharing: CS pedagogical content knowledge sharing in online environments. In Proceedings of the 11th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (pp. 27–36). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Goode, J., Margolis, J., & Chapman, G. (2014). Curriculum is not enough: The educational theory and research foundation of the exploring computer science professional development model. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 493–498). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Gudmundsdottir, S. (1990). Curriculum stories. In Day, C., Pope, M. L., & Denicolo, P. (Eds.), Insights into Teachers’ Thinking and Practice (pp. 107–118). London, UK: Falmer.Google Scholar

Gudmundsdottir, S. (1991). Story-maker, story-teller: Narrative structures in curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23(3), 207–218.Google Scholar

Hairon, S., Goh, J. W. P., & Chua, C. S. K. (2015). Teacher leadership enactment in professional learning community contexts: Towards a better understanding of the phenomenon. School Leadership & Management, 35(2), 163–182.Google Scholar

Harvard (2015). ScratchEd. Retrieved from http://scratched.gse.harvard.eduGoogle Scholar

Hattie, J. (2015). The applicability of visible learning to higher education. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(1), 79–91.Google Scholar

Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 952–984.Google Scholar

Hill, H. C., Loewenberg Ball, D., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.Google Scholar

Hofstein, A., Carmi, M., & Ben-Zvi, R. (2003). The development of leadership among chemistry teachers in israel. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(1), 39–65.Google Scholar

Hollins, E. R., McIntyre, L. R., DeBose, C., Hollins, K. S., & Towner, A. (2004). Promoting a self-sustaining learning community: Investigating an internal model for teacher development. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 17(2), 247–264.Google Scholar

House, E. R. (1974). The Politics of Educational Innovation. Richmond, CA: McCutchan.Google Scholar

Howey, K. R., & Grossman, P. L. (1989). A study in contrast: Sources of pedagogical content knowledge for secondary english. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(5), 24–31.Google Scholar

Hubwieser, P., Magenheim, J., Mühling, A., & Ruf, A. (2013). Towards a conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge for computer science. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 1–8). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Humphreys, S. (2017). Computing at school: 10 years on. In Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Primary and Secondary Computing Education (p. 3). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.Google Scholar

Lapidot, T. (2007). Supporting the growth of CS leading teachers. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (p. 327). New York: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lapidot, T., & Aharoni, D. (2007). The Israeli summer seminars for CS leading teachers. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (p. 318). New York: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lehane, L., & Bertram, A. (2016). Getting to the CoRe of it: A review of a specific PCK conceptual lens in science educational research. Educación Química, 27(1), 52–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lenning, O. T., Hill, D. M., Saunders, K. P., Solan, A., & Stokes, A. (2013). Powerful Learning Communities: A Guide to Developing Student, Faculty, and Professional Learning Communities to Improve Student Success and Organizational Effectiveness. Sterling, VA: Stylus.Google Scholar

Liberman, N., Kolikant, Y. B., & Beeri, C. (2012). “Regressed experts” as a new state in teachers’ professional development: Lessons from computer science teachers’ adjustments to substantial changes in the curriculum. Computer Science Education, 22(3), 257–283.Google Scholar

Little, J. W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509–536.Google Scholar

Lloyd, M., & Cochrane, J. (2006). Celtic knots: Interweaving the elements of effective teacher professional development in ICT. Australian Educational Computing, 21(2), 16–19.Google Scholar

Loewenberg Ball, D., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.Google Scholar

Loughran, J. (2014). Professionally developing as a teacher educator. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 271–283.Google Scholar

Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2006). Understanding and Developing Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar

Louis, K. S., Marks, H. M., & Kruse, S. (1996). Teachers’ professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33(4), 757–798.Google Scholar

Macià, M., & García, I. (2016). Informal online communities and networks as a source of teacher professional development: A review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 291–307.Google Scholar

Michaeli, N., & Sommer, O. (Eds.) (2014). Activity Report by the Steering Committee Chaired by Prof. Miriam Ben-Peretz and Prof. Lee Shulman: Leading Teachers As Agents of Improvement in the Education System. Jerusalem: The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities.Google Scholar

Morrison, B., Ni, L., & Guzdial, M. (2012). Adapting the disciplinary commons model for high school teachers: Improving recruitment, creating community. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 47–54). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Ni, L., Guzdial, M., Tew, A. E., Morrison, B., & Galanos, R. (2011). Building a community to support HS CS teachers: The disciplinary commons for computing educators. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 553–558). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Pahl, K., & Rowsell, J. (2010). Artifactual literacies: Every object tells a story. New York, NY: Teachers’ College Press.Google Scholar

Park, M., & Sung, Y. (2013). Teachers’ perceptions of the recent curriculum reforms and their implementation: What can we learn from the case of korean elementary teachers? Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 33(1), 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perry, R. R., & Lewis, C. C. (2009). What is successful adaptation of lesson study in the US? Journal of Educational Change, 10(4), 365–391.Google Scholar

Poekert, P. E. (2012). Teacher leadership and professional development: Examining links between two concepts central to school improvement. Professional Development in Education, 38(2), 169–188.Google Scholar

Roberts, E. (2004). The dream of a common language: The search for simplicity and stability in computer science education. In Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 115–119). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Rose, M. (1995). Possible Lives: The Promise of Public Education in America. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar

Saeli, M., Perrenet, J., Wim, M. G. J., & Zwaneveld, B. (2011). Teaching programming in secondary school: A pedagogical content knowledge perspective. Informatics in Education, 10(1), 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saeli, M., Perrenet, J., Wim, M. G. J., & Zwaneveld, B. (2012a). Pedagogical content knowledge in teaching material. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(3), 267–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saeli, M., Perrenet, J., Wim, M. G. J., & Zwaneveld, B. (2012b). Programming: Teachers and pedagogical content knowledge in The Netherlands. Informatics in Education, 11(1), 81–114.Google Scholar

Salmon, G. (2002). E-Tivities: The Key to Active Online Learning. London, UK: Kogan Page.Google Scholar

Schön, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London, UK: Temple Smith.Google Scholar

Sentance, S., Dorling, M., McNicol, A., & Crick, T. (2012). Grand challenges for the UK: Upskilling teachers to teach computer science within the secondary curriculum. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (pp. 82–85). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Sentance, S., Humphreys, S., & Dorling, M. (2014). The network of teaching excellence in computer science and master teachers. In Proceedings of the 9th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (pp. 80–88). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Shinners-Kennedy, D., & Fincher, S. (2015). Scaffolded autoethnography: A method for examining practice-to-research. In 6th Research in Engineering Education Symposium (pp. 504–512). Melbourne, Australia: Curran Associates.Google Scholar

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.Google Scholar

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23.Google Scholar

Shulman, L. S. (2015). PCK: Its genesis and exodus. In Berry, A., Friedrichsen, P. J., & Loughran, J. (Eds.), Re-Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Education (p. 3). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Smith, K. (2005). Teacher educators’ expertise: What do novice teachers and teacher educators say? Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 177–192.Google Scholar

Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.Google Scholar

Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The Teaching Gap: Best Ideas from the World’s Teachers for Improving Education in the Classroom. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221–258.Google Scholar

Tenenberg, J., & Fincher, S. (2007). Opening the door of the computer science classroom: The disciplinary commons. In Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 514–518). New York: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The Royal Society (2017). After the Reboot – Computing Education in UK Schools. London, UK: The Royal Society.Google Scholar

Trust, T., Krutka, D. G., & Carpenter, J. P. (2016). “Together we are better”: Professional learning networks for teachers. Computers & Education, 102, 15–34.Google Scholar

van Manen, M. (1995). On the epistemology of reflective practice. Teachers and Teaching, 1(1), 33–50.Google Scholar

Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja, R. N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge – A review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121.Google Scholar

Wei, R. C., Darling-Hammond, L., & Adamson, F. (2010). Professional Development in the United States: Trends and Challenges. Dallas, TX: National Staff Development Council.Google Scholar

Aritajati, C., Rosson, M. B., Pena, J., Cinque, D., & Segura, A. (2015). A socio-cognitive analysis of summer camp outcomes and experiences. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ‘15) (pp. 581–586). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Begel, A., Bosch, J., & Storey, M. A. (2013). Social networking meets software development: Perspectives from GitHub, MSDN, Stack Exchange, and TopCoder. IEEE Software, 30(1) 52–66.Google Scholar

Bishop, J., Horspool, R. N., Xie, T., Tillmann, N. & de Halleux, J. (2015). Code Hunt: Experience with coding contests at scale. In Proceedings of the 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 398–407). New York: IEEE.Google Scholar

Bloomfield, A., Sherriff, M., & Williams, K. (2014). A service learning practicum capstone. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ‘14) (pp. 265–270). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Booth, S. E., & Kellogg, S. B. (2015). Value creation in online communities for educators. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(4), 684–698.Google Scholar

Boustedt, J., Eckerdal, A., McCartney, R., Sanders, K., Thomas, L., & Zander, C. (2011). Students’ perceptions of the differences between formal and informal learning. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Computing Education Research (ICER ‘11) (pp. 61–68). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Bower, M. (2008). The “instructed-teacher”: A computer science online learning pedagogical pattern. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE ‘08) (pp. 189–193). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Brandt, J., Guo, P. J., Lewenstein, J., Dontcheva, M., & Klemmer, S. R. (2009). Two studies of opportunistic programming: interleaving web foraging, learning, and writing code. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘09) (pp. 1589–1598). New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar

Brown, N. C. C., & Kölling, M. (2013). A tale of three sites: Resource and knowledge sharing amongst computer science educators. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER ‘13) (pp. 27–34). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Cao, J., Fleming, S. D., & Burnett, M. (2011). An exploration of design opportunities for “gardening” end-user programmers’ ideas. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) (pp. 35–42). New York: IEEE.Google Scholar

Carswell, L. (1997). Teaching via the Internet: The impact of the Internet as a communication medium on distance learning introductory computing students. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education (ITiCSE ‘97) (pp. 1–5). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Carswell, L. (1998). The “Virtual University”: Toward an Internet paradigm? In Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on the Teaching of Computing and the 3rd Annual Conference on Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education: Changing the Delivery of Computer Science Education (ITiCSE ‘98) (pp. 46–50). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Chambers, C., Chen, S., Le, D., & Scaffidi, C. (2012). The function, and dysfunction, of information sources in learning functional programming. Journal of Computing Sciences in College, 28(1), 220–226.Google Scholar

Charters, P., Lee, M. J., Ko, A. J., & Loksa, D. (2014). Challenging stereotypes and changing attitudes: The effect of a brief programming encounter on adults’ attitudes toward programming. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 653–658). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Cho, M. H., Demei, S., & Laffey, J. (2010). Relationships between self-regulation and social experiences in asynchronous online learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 21(3), 297–316.Google Scholar

Cicirello, V. A. (2013). Experiences with a real projects for real clients course on software engineering at a liberal arts institution. Journal of Computing Sciences in College, 28(6), 50–56.Google Scholar

Clements, K., Pawlowski, J., & Manouselis, N. (2015). Open educational resources repositories literature review – Towards a comprehensive quality approaches framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 51(B), 1098–1106.Google Scholar

Connelly, C., Biermann, A. W., Pennock, D., & Wu, P. (1996). Home study software: Complementary systems for computer science courses. Computer Science Education, 7(1), 53–71.Google Scholar

Cooper, S., & Sahami, M. (2013). Reflections on Stanford’s MOOCs. Communications of the ACM, 56(2), 28–30.Google Scholar

Crellin, J., Duke-Williams, E., Chandler, J., & Collinson, T. (2009). Virtual worlds in computing education. Computer Science Education, 19(4), 315–334.Google Scholar

Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8.Google Scholar

Dahotre, A., Krishnamoorthy, V., Corley, M., & Scaffidi, C. (2011). Using intelligent tutors to enhance student learning of application programming interfaces. Journal of Computing Sciences in College, 27(1). 195–201.Google Scholar

Dankell, II, D. D., & Hearn, J. (1997). The use of the WWW to support distance learning through NTU. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education (ITiCSE ‘97) (pp. 8–10). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Dasgupta, S., Hale, W., Monroy-Hernández, A., & Hill, B. M. (2016). Remixing as a pathway to computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 1438–1449). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Decker, A., McGill, M. M., & Settle, A. (2016). Towards a common framework for evaluating computing outreach activities. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (SIGCSE ‘16) (pp. 627–632). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

DeWitt, A., Fay, J., Goldman, M., Nicolson, E., Oyolu, L., Resch, L., Saldaña, J. M., Sounalath, S., Williams, T., Yetter, K., Zak, E., Brown, N., & Rebelsky, S. A. (2017). What we say vs. what they do: A comparison of middle-school coding camps in the cs education literature and mainstream coding camps (abstract only). In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ‘17) (p. 707). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

DiSalvo, B., Reid, C., & Roshan, P. K. (2014). They can’t find us: The search for informal CS education. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ‘14) (pp. 487–492). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Dorn, B. (2011). ScriptABLE: Supporting informal learning with cases. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Computing Education Research (ICER ‘11) (pp. 69–76). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Dorn, B., & Guzdial, M. (2006). Graphic designers who program as informal computer science learners. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Computing Education Research (ICER '06) (pp. 127–134). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Dorn, B., & Guzdial, M. (2010). Learning on the job: Characterizing the programming knowledge and learning strategies of web designers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘10) (pp. 703–712). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Dorn, B., Stankiewicz, A., & Roggi, C. (2013). Lost while searching: Difficulties in information seeking among end-user programmers. In Proceedings of the 76th ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Beyond the Cloud: Rethinking Information Boundaries (ASIST ‘13) (pp. 21:1–21:11). Silver Springs, MD: Association for Information Science and Technology.Google Scholar

Ellis, H. J. C., Hislop, G. W., Jackson, S., & Postner, L. (2015). Team project experiences in humanitarian free and open source software (HFOSS). Transactions on Computing Education. 15(4), 1–23.Google Scholar

Ericson, B. J., & McKlin, T. (2012). Effective and sustainable computing summer camps. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ‘12) (pp. 289–294). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Ericson, B. J., Guzdial, M. J., & Morrison, B. B. (2015). Analysis of interactive features designed to enhance learning in an ebook. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER ‘15) (pp. 169–178). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Ericson, B. J., Rogers, K., Parker, M. Morrison, B., & Guzdial, M. (2016). Identifying design principles for CS teacher ebooks through design-based research. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER ‘16) (pp. 191–200). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Fields, D. A., Giang, M., & Kafai, Y. (2014). Programming in the wild: Trends in youth computational participation in the online Scratch community. In Proceedings of the 9th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (WiPSCE ‘14) (pp. 2–11). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Fincher, S., & Knox, D. (2013). The porous classroom: Professional practices in the computing curriculum. Computer, 46(9), 44–51.Google Scholar

Fincher, S., Kölling, M., Utting, , Brown, I., , N., & Stevens, P. (2010). Repositories of teaching material and communities of use: nifty assignments and the greenroom. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Computing Education Research (ICER ‘10) (pp. 107–114). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Fitzpatrick, J. M., Lédeczi, Á., Narasimham, G., Lafferty, L., Labrie, R., Mielke, P. T., Kumar, A., & Brady, K. A. (2017). Lessons learned in the design and delivery of an introductory programming MOOC. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ‘17) (pp. 219–224). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Gal-Ezer, J., Vilner, T., & Zur, E. (2009). The professor on your PC: A virtual CS1 course. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE ‘09) (pp. 191–195). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Gersting, J. L. (2000). Computer science distance education experience in Hawaii. Computer Science Education, 10(1), 95–106.Google Scholar

Gordon, M. & Guo, P. J. (2015). Codepourri: Creating visual coding tutorials using a volunteer crowd of learners. In 2015 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) (pp. 13–21). New York: IEEE.Google Scholar

Grover, S., Pea, R., & Cooper, S. (2015). Designing for deeper learning in a blended computer science course for middle school students. Computer Science Education, 25(2), 199–237.Google Scholar

Guo, P. J. (2013). Online Python tutor: Embeddable web-based program visualization for CS education. In Proceedings of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 579–584). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Guo, P. J. (2015). Codeopticon: Real-time, one-to-many human tutoring for computer programming. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology. (pp. 13–21). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Guo, P. J. (2017). Older adults learning computer programming: Motivations, frustrations, and design opportunities. In ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) (pp. 7070–7083). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Guo, P. J., & Reinecke, K. (2014). Demographic differences in how students navigate through MOOCs. In Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (pp. 21–30). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of mooc videos. In Proceedings of the first ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (pp. 41–50). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Guo, P. J., White, J., & Zanelatto, R. (2015). Codechella: Multi-user program visualizations for real-time tutoring and collaborative learning. In 2015 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) (pp. 79–87). New York: IEEE.Google Scholar

Guzdial, M., Ericson, B., Mcklin, T., & Engelman, S. (2014). Georgia Computes! An intervention in a US State, with formal and informal education in a policy context. Transactions on Computing Education, 14(2), 13.Google Scholar

Hao, Q., Wright, E., Barnes, B., & Branch, R. M. (2016). What are the most important predictors of computer science students’ online help-seeking behaviors? Computers in Human Behavior, 62(C), 467–474.Google Scholar

Harms, K. J., Cosgrove, D., Gray, S., & Kelleher, C. (2013). Automatically generating tutorials to enable middle school children to learn programming independently. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ‘13) (pp. 11–19). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Hislop, G. W., Ellis, H. J. C., Pulimood, S. M., Morgan, B., Mello-Stark, S., Coleman, B., & Macdonell, C. (2015). A multi-institutional study of learning via student involvement in humanitarian free and open source software projects. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER ‘15) (pp. 199–206). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Hitz, M., & Kögeler, S. (1997). Teaching C++ on the WWW. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education (ITiCSE ‘97) (pp. 11–13). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Howard, L., Johnson, J., & Neitzel, C. (2010). Reflecting on online learning designs using observed behavior. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE ‘10) (pp. 179–183). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Howard, S., & McKeown, J. (2011). Online Practice & Offline Roles: A Cultural View of Teachers’ Low Engagement in Online Communities. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar

Jin, W., & Corbett, A. (2011). Effectiveness of cognitive apprenticeship learning (CAL) and cognitive tutors (CT) for problem solving using fundamental programming concepts. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ‘11) (pp. 305–310). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Jones, M. C., & Churchill, E. F. (2009). Conversations in developer communities: a preliminary analysis of the yahoo! pipes community. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Communities and technologies (C&T ‘09) (pp. 195–204). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Kelleher, C., Pausch, R., & Kiesler, S. (2007). Storytelling Alice motivates middle school girls to learn computer programming. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘07) (pp. 1455–1464). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Kim, A. S., & Ko, A. J. (2017). A pedagogical analysis of online coding tutorials. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '17) (pp. 321–326). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Kim, J., Guo, P. J., Seaton, D. T., Mitros, P., Gajos, K. Z., & Miller, R. C. (2014). Understanding in-video dropouts and interaction peaks in online lecture videos. In Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (pp. 31–40). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Klomsri, T., Grebäck, L., & Tedre, M. (2013). Social media in everyday learning: How Facebook supports informal learning among young adults in South Africa. In Proceedings of the 13th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling ‘13) (pp. 135–144). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Knox, D., & Fincher, S. (2013). Where students go for knowledge and what they find there. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER ‘13) (pp. 35–40). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-Directed Learning: A Guide for Learners and Teachers. New York: Associated Press.Google Scholar

Ko, A. J., Myers, B. A., & Aung, H. H. (2004). Six learning barriers in end-user programming systems. In 2004 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human Centric Computing (pp. 199–206). New York: IEEE.Google Scholar

Ko, A. J., Abraham, R., Beckwith, L., Blackwell, A., Burnett, M., Erwig, M., Scaffidi, C., Lawrance, J., Lieberman, H., Myers, B., Rosson, M. B., Rothermel, G., Shaw, M., & Wiedenbeck, S. (2011). The state of the art in end-user software engineering. ACM Computing Surveys, 43(3), 21.Google Scholar

Ko, A. J. & Davis, K. (2017). Computing mentorship in a software boomtown: Relationships to adolescent interest and beliefs. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER ‘17) (pp. 236–244). New York: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koppelman, H., & Vranken, H. (2008). Experiences with a synchronous virtual classroom in distance education. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE ‘08) (pp. 194–198). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Kulkarni, C. E., Socher, R., Bernstein, M.S., & Klemmer, S.R. (2014). Scaling short-answer grading by combining peer assessment with algorithmic scoring. In Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (pp. 99–108). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Leake, M., & Lewis, C. (2016). Designing a new system for sharing computer science teaching resources. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion (CSCW ‘16 Companion) (pp. 321–324). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Leake, M., & Lewis, C. M. (2017). Recommendations for designing CS resource sharing sites for all teachers. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ‘17) (pp. 357–362). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Leander, K. M., Phillips, N. C., & Taylor, K. H. (2010). The changing social spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 329–394.Google Scholar

Lee, M. J., Bahmani, F., Kwan, I., LaFerte, J., Charters, P., Horvath, A., Luor, F., Cao, J., Law, C., Beswetherick, M., Long, S., Burnett, M., & Ko, A. J. (2014). Principles of a debugging-first puzzle game for computing education. In 2014 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) (pp. 57–64). New York: IEEE.Google Scholar

Lee, M. J., & Ko, A. J. (2011). Personifying programming tool feedback improves novice programmers’ learning. In International Computing Education Research Workshop (ICER) (pp. 109–116). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Lee, M. J., & Ko, A. J. (2012). Investigating the role of purposeful goals on novices’ engagement in a programming game. In IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) (pp. 163–166). New York: IEEE.Google Scholar

Lee, M. J., Ko, A. J., & Kwan, I. (2013). In-game assessments increase novice programmers’ engagement and level completion speed. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 153–160). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Lee, M. J., & Ko, A. J. (2015). Comparing the effectiveness of online learning approaches on CS1 learning outcomes. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 237–246). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Lehtonen, T., Aho, T., Isohanni, E., & Mikkonen, T. (2015). On the role of gamification and localization in an open online learning environment: Javala experiences. In Proceedings of the 15th Koli Calling Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling ‘15) (pp. 50–59). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Loksa, D., Ko, A. J., Jernigan, W., Oleson, A., Mendez, C. J., & Burnett, M. M. (2016). Programming, problem solving, and self-awareness: Effects of explicit guidance. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘16) (pp. 1449–1461). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Malan, D. J. (2009). Virtualizing office hours in CS 50. In Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE ‘09) (pp. 303–307). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Mamykina, L., Manoim, B., Mittal, M., Hripcsak, G., & Hartmann, B. (2011). Design lessons from the fastest Q&A site in the west. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2857–2866). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2001). Informal and incidental learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2001(89), 25–34.Google Scholar

Marsick, V. J., & Volpe, M. (1999). The nature of and need for informal learning. In Marsick, V. J. & Volpe, M. (Eds.), Informal Learning on the Job, Advances in Developing Human Resources, No. 3 (pp. 1–9). San Francisco, CA: Berrett Koehler.Google Scholar

McCartney, R., Eckerdal, A., Moström, J. E., Sanders, K., Thomas, L., & Zander, C. (2010). Computing students learning computing informally. In Proceedings of the 10th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling ‘10) (pp. 43–48). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

McGill, M. M., Decker, A., & Settle, A. (2015). Does outreach impact choices of major for underrepresented undergraduate students? In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER ‘15) (pp. 71–80). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Menard, S. A. W. (1993). Critical Learning Incidents of Female Army Nurse Vietnam Veterans and Their Perceptions of Organizational Culture in a Combat Area. (Women Vetersans, Nurses) (PhD dissertation). University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar

Miljanovic, M. A., & Bradbury, J. S. (2017). RoboBUG: A serious game for learning debugging techniques. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER ‘17) (pp. 93–100). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Mitchell, S. M., & Lutters, W. G. (2006). Assessing the value of computer science course material repositories. In Proceedings of the 19th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training Workshops (CSEETW ‘06) (p. 2). New York: IEEE.Google Scholar

Moraveji, N., Morris, M., Morris, D., Czerwinski, M., & Riche, N. H. (2011). ClassSearch: Facilitating the development of web search skills through social learning. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘11) (pp. 1797–1806). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Nandi, A., & Mandernach, M. (2016). Hackathons as an informal learning platform. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (SIGCSE ‘16) (pp. 346–351). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Nelson, G. L., Xie, B., & Ko, A. J. (2017). Comprehension first: Evaluating a novel pedagogy and tutoring system for program tracing in CS1. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 2–11). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic Books, Inc.Google Scholar

Park, T. H., & Wiedenbeck, S. (2011). Learning web development: Challenges at an earlier stage of computing education. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Computing Education Research (ICER ‘11) (pp. 125–132). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Pullen, J. M. (2006). Scaling up a distance education program in computer science. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITICSE ‘06) (pp. 33–37). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, , Eastmond, N., Brennan, E., Milner, K., Rosenbaum, A., Silver, E., Silverman, J., , B., & Kafai, Y. (2009). Scratch: programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60–67.Google Scholar

Rosbottom, J. (2001). Hybrid learning – A safe route into web-based open and distance learning for the computer science teacher. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE ‘01) (pp. 89–92). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Sadowski, C., Stolee, K. T., & Elbaum, S. (2015). How developers search for code: a case study. In Proceedings of the 2015 10th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE 2015) (pp. 191–201). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Schlager, M. S., & Fusco, J. (2003). Teacher professional development, technology, and communities of practice: Are we putting the cart before the horse? The Information Society, 19(3), 203–220.Google Scholar

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.Google Scholar

Sirkiä, T., & Sorva, J. (2015). How do students use program visualizations within an interactive ebook? In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER ‘15) (pp. 179–188). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Stone, J. A., & Madigan, E. (2011). Experiences with community-based projects for computing majors. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 26(6), 64–70.Google Scholar

Stone, J. A., MacKellar, B., Madigan, E. M., & Pearce, J. L. (2012). Community-based projects for computing majors: opportunities, challenges and best practices. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ‘12) (pp. 85–86). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Tillmann, N., De Halleux, J., Xie, T., & Bishop, J. (2012). Pex4Fun: Teaching and learning computer science via social gaming. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 25th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEET ‘12) (pp. 90–91). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar

Truong, N., Bancroft, P., & Roe, P. (2005). Learning to program through the web. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE ‘05) (pp. 9–13). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Venkatagiri, S. (2006). Engineering the software requirements of nonprofits: A service-learning approach. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software engineering (ICSE ‘06) (pp. 643–648). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

von Wright, J. (2000). Distance tutorials in a systems design course. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual SIGCSE/SIGCUE ITiCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE ‘00) (pp. 105–107). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Wagner, A., Gray, J., Corley, J., & Wolber, D. 2013. Using App Inventor in a K–12 summer camp. In Proceedings of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ‘13) (pp. 621–626). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Warner, J., Doorenbos, J., Miller, B., & Guo, P. J. (2015). How high school, college, and online students differentially engage with an interactive digital textbook. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 528–531). International: International Educational Data Mining Society.Google Scholar

Warner, J., & Guo, P. J. (2017). Hack.edu: Examining how college hackathons are perceived by student attendees and non-attendees. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER ‘17) (pp. 254–262). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Warren, J., Rixner, S., Greiner, J., & Wong, S. (2014). Facilitating human interaction in an online programming course. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ‘14) (pp. 665–670). New York: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Webb, H. C., & Rosson, M. B. (2011). Exploring careers while learning Alice 3D: A summer camp for middle school girls. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ‘11) (pp. 377–382). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Zander, C., Boustedt, J., Eckerdal, A., McCartney, R., Sanders, K., Moström, J. E., & Thomas, L. (2012). Self-directed learning: Stories from industry. In Proceedings of the 12th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling ‘12) (pp. 111–117). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Zheng, S., Rosson, M. B., Shih, P. C., & Carroll, J. M. (2015). Understanding student motivation, behaviors and perceptions in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW ‘15) (pp. 1882–1895). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Zhu, J., Warner, J., Gordon, M., White, J., Zanelatto, R., & Guo, P. J. (2015). Toward a domain-specific visual discussion forum for learning computer programming: An empirical study of a popular MOOC forum. In IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) (pp. 101–109). New York: IEEE.Google Scholar

Adams, W. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2011). Development and validation of instruments to measure learning of expert-like thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 33(9), 1289–1312.Google Scholar

Almstrum, V. L., Henderson, P. B., Harvey, V. J., Heeren, C., Marion, W. A., Riedesel, C., Soh, K.-L., & Tew, A. E. (2006). Concept inventories in computer science for the topic discrete mathematics. SIGCSE Bulletin, 38(4), 132–145.Google Scholar

Barker, L. J., Garvin-Doxas, K., & Jackson, M. (2002). Defensive climate in the computer science classroom. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE 2002) (pp. 43–47). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 8, 47–89.Google Scholar

Baxter, G. P., & Glaser, R. (1998). Investigating the cognitive complexity of science assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17(3), 37–45.Google Scholar

Beck, K. (2003). Test-Driven Development by Example. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Buswell, G. T. (1930). Summary of arithmetic investigations (1929). The Elementary School Journal, 30(10), 766–775.Google Scholar

Bonar, J., & Soloway, E. (1989). Preprogramming knowledge: A major source of misconceptions in novice programmers. Human–Computer Interaction, 1(2), 133–161.Google Scholar

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (1999). How People Learn: Mind, Brain, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Research Council.Google Scholar

Carbonneau, K. J., Marley, S. C., & Selig, J. P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 380–400.Google Scholar

Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., & Carey, D. A. (1988). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of students’ problem solving in elementary arithmetic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(5), 385–401.Google Scholar

Chan, W. W. L., Au, T. K., & Tang, J. (2014). Strategic counting: A novel assessment of place-value understanding. Learning and Instruction, 29, 78–94.Google Scholar

Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1045–1060.Google Scholar

Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4(1), 55–81.Google Scholar

Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Handron, C., & Hudson, L. (2013). The stereotypical computer scientist: Gendered media representations as a barrier to inclusion for women. Sex Roles, 69(1–2), 58–71.Google Scholar

Cheryan, S., Siy, J. O., Vichayapai, M., Drury, B. J., & Kim, S. (2011). Do female and male role models who embody STEM stereotypes hinder women’s anticipated success in STEM? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(6), 656–664.Google Scholar

Chi, M. T., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121–52.Google Scholar

Chung, A., Shao, P., & Vasquez, A. (2017). Students’ misconceptions about the types of values data structures can store. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 32(4), 72–78.Google Scholar

Clancy, M. (2004). Misconceptions and attitudes that interfere with learning to program. In Fincher, S. & Petre, M. (Eds.), Computer Science Education Research (pp. 85–100). Abingdon, UK: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar

Confrey, J. (1990). A review of the research on student conceptions in mathematics, science, and programming. Review of Research in Education, 16, 3–56.Google Scholar

Danielsiek, H., Paul, W., & Vahrenhold, J. (2012). Detecting and understanding students’ misconceptions related to algorithms and data structures. In Proceedings of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE 2012) (pp. 21–26). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Davis, E. A., Linn, M. C., Mann, L. M., & Clancy, M. J. (1993). Mind your P’s and Q’s: Using parentheses and quotes in LISP. In Cook, C. R., Scholtz, J. C., & Spohrer, J. C. (Eds.), Empirical Studies of Programmers: Fifth Workshop (pp. 63–85). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Davis, E. A., Linn, M. C., & Clancy, M. J. (1995). Learning to use parentheses and quotes in LISP. Computer Science Education, 6(1), 15–31.Google Scholar

Denny, P., Luxton-Reilly, A., & Simon, B. (2008). Evaluating a new exam question: Parsons’ problems. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Computing Education Research (ICER ‘08) (pp. 113–124). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

diSessa, A. A. (2014a). A history of conceptual change research: Threads and fault lines. In Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, 2nd edn. (pp. 88–108). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

diSessa, A. A. (2014b). The construction of causal schemes: Learning mechanisms at the knowledge level. Cognitive Science, 38(5), 795–850.Google Scholar

Dowhower, S. L. (1994). Repeated reading revisited: Research into practice. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 10(4), 343–358.Google Scholar

Eckerdal, A., & Thuné, M. (2005). Novice Java programmers’ conceptions of “object” and “class”, and variation theory. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE ‘05) (pp. 89–93). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Felleisen, M., Findler, R. B., Flatt, M., & Krishnamurthi, S. (2000). How to Design Programs: An Introduction to Programming and Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fisler, K. (2014). The Recurring Rainfall Problem. In Proceedings of the International Computing Education Research Conference (ICER 2014) (pp. 35–42). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Fisler, K., Krishnamurthi, S., & Tunnell Wilson, P. (2017). Assessing and teaching scope, mutation, and aliasing in upper-level undergraduates. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE 2017) (pp. 21–26). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Fuson, K. C. (1998). Pedagogical, mathematical, and real-world conceptual-support nets: A model for building children’s multidigit domain knowledge. Mathematical Cognition, 4(2), 147–186.Google Scholar

Gal-Ezer, J., & Trakhtenbrot, M. (2016). Identification and addressing reduction-related misconceptions. Computer Science Education, 26(2–3), 89–103.Google Scholar

Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., & Vlissides, J. (1995). Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Ginat, D., & Blau, Y. (2017). Multiple levels of abstraction in algorithmic problem solving. In Proceedings of the 48th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE 2017) (pp. 237–242). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Gobet, F., Lane, P. C. R., Croker, S., Cheng, P. C.-H., Jones, G., Oliver, I., & Pine, J. M. (2001). Chunking mechanisms in human learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(6), 236–243.Google Scholar

Guzdial, M. (2015). Learner-centered design of computing education: Research on computing for everyone. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics, 8(6), 1–165.Google Scholar

Hamouda, S., Edwards, S. H., Elmongui, H. G., Ernst, J. V., & Shaffer, C. A. (2017). A basic recursion concept inventory. Computer Science Education, 27(2), 121–148.Google Scholar

Hansen, J., & Pearson, P. D. (1983). An instructional study: Improving the inferential comprehension of good and poor fourth-grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(6), 821–829.Google Scholar

Herman, G. L., Loui, M. C., Kaczmarczyk, L. C., & Zilles, C. B. (2012). Describing the what and why of students’ difficulties in Boolean logic. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 12(1), Article 3, 28 pages.Google Scholar

Holland, S., Griffiths, R., & Woodman, M. (1997). Avoiding object misconceptions. In Proceedings of the 28th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGSCE 1997) (pp. 131–134). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Hughes, E. M., Witzel, B. S., Riccomini, P. J., Fries, K. M., & Kanyongo, G. Y. (2014). A meta-analysis of algebra interventions for learners with disabilities and struggling learners. Journal of the International Association of Special Education, 15(1), 36–47.Google Scholar

Kahney, H. (1989). What do novice programmers know about recursion? In Soloway, E. & Spohrer, J. C. (Eds.), Studying the Novice Programmer (pp. 209–228). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar

Karpierz, K., & Wolfman, S. A. (2014). Misconceptions and concept inventory questions for binary search trees and hash tables. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ‘13) (pp. 109–114). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Keeley, P., Eberle, F., & Farrin, L. (2005). Uncovering Student Ideas in Science, Vol. 1: 25 Formative Assessment Probes. Arlington, VA: National Science Teacher Association Press.Google Scholar

Kellogg, R. T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), 1–26.Google Scholar

Kellogg, R. T. (1994). The Psychology of Writing. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kölling, M., & Rosenberg, J. (2001). Guidelines for teaching object orientation with Java. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE ‘01) (pp. 33–36). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 3–21.Google Scholar

Ladd, H. F., & Sorensen, L. C. (2017). Returns to teacher experience: Student achievement and motivation in middle school. Education Finance and Policy, 12(2), 241–279.Google Scholar

Lane, P. C., Cheng, P. C. H., & Gobet, F. (2000). CHREST+: A simulation of how humans learn to solve problems using diagrams. AISB Quarterly, 103, 24–30.Google Scholar

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Levin, J. R., Levin, M. E., Glasman, L. D., & Nordwall, M. B. (1992). Mnemonic vocabulary instruction: Additional effectiveness evidence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17(2), 156–174.Google Scholar

Lewis, C. M. (2012). Applications of Out-of-Domain Knowledge in Students’ Reasoning about Computer Program State (PhD dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

McCauley, R., Grissom, S., Fitzgerald, S., & Murphy, L. (2015). Teaching and learning recursive programming: A review of the research literature. Computer Science Education, 25(1), 37–66.Google Scholar

Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97.Google Scholar

Miller, S. P., Butler, F. M., & Lee, K.-H. (1998). Validated practices for teaching mathematics to students with learning disabilities: A review of literature. Focus on Exceptional Children, 31(1), 1–24.Google Scholar

Murphy, L., Fitzgerald, S., Lister, R., & McCauley, R. (2012). Ability to “explain in plain English” linked to proficiency in computer-based programming. In Proceedings of the International Computing Education Research Conference (ICER ‘12) (pp. 111–118). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Nasir, N. S., & Hand, V. (2008). From the court to the classroom: Opportunities for engagement, learning, and identity in basketball and classroom mathematics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(2), 143–179.Google Scholar

Nasir, N. S., & Shah, N. (2011). On defense: African American males making sense of racialized narratives in mathematics education. Journal of African American Males in Education, 2(1), 24–45.Google Scholar

Nathan, M. J., & Petrosino, A. (2003). Expert blind spot among preservice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 905–928.Google Scholar

O’Brien, D., Dias, M. G., Roazzi, A., & Cantor, J. B. (1998). Pinocchio’s nose knows: Preschool children recognize that a pragmatic rule can be violated, an indicative conditional can be falsified, and that a broken promise is a false promise. In Braine, M. D. S. & O’Brien, D. P. (Eds.), Mental Logic (pp. 447–457). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

O’Brien, D. P., Roazzi, A., Dias, M. G., Cantor, J. B., & Brooks, P. J. (2004). Violations, lies, broken promises, and just plain mistakes: The pragmatics of counterexamples, logical semantics, and the evaluation of conditional assertions, regulations, and promises in variants of Wason’s selection task. In Manktelow, K. & Chung, M. C. (Eds.), Psychology of Reasoning: Theoretical and Historical Perspectives (pp. 95–126). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Parsons, D., & Haden, P. (2006). Parson’s programming puzzles: A fun and effective learning tool for first programming courses. In Proceedings of the 8th Australasian Conference on Computing Education (pp. 157–163). Darlinghurst, Australia: Australian Computer Society.Google Scholar

Pea, R. D. (1986). Language-independent conceptual “bugs” in novice programming. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2(1), 25–36.Google Scholar

Pedroni, M. & Meyer, B. (2010). Object-oriented modeling of object-oriented concepts: A case study in structuring an educational domain. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Informatics in Schools: Situation, Evolution, and Perspectives (ISSEP 2010), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5941 (pp. 155–169). Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar

Pollack, I. (1953). Assimilation of sequentially encoded information. The American Journal of Psychology, 66(3), 421–435.Google Scholar

Pollard, S., & Duvall, R. C. (2006). Everything I needed to know about teaching I learned in kindergarten: Bringing elementary education techniques to undergraduate computer science classes. In Proceedings of the 37th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE 2006) (pp. 224–228). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Qian, Y. & Lehman, J. (2017). Students’ misconceptions and other difficulties in introductory programming: A literature review. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 18(1), Article 1, 24 pages.Google Scholar

Ragonis, N., & Ben-Ari, M. (2005). A long-term investigation of the comprehension of OOP concepts by novices. Computer Science Education, 15(3), 203–221.Google Scholar

Rich, K. M., Strickland, C., Binkowski, T. A., Moran, C., & Franklin, D. (2017). K–8 learning trajectories derived from research literature: Sequence, repetition, conditionals. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER ‘17) (pp. 182–190). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Rivera, D., & Smith, D. D. (1988). Using a demonstration strategy to teach midschool students with learning disabilities how to compute long division. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21(2), 77–81.Google Scholar

Rinderknecht, C. (2014). A survey on teaching and learning recursive programming. Informatics in Education, 13(1), 87–119.Google Scholar

Robins, A., Rountree, J., & Rountree, N. (2003). Learning and teaching programming: A review and discussion. Computer Science Education, 13(2), 137–172.Google Scholar

Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Coyle, H. P., Cook-Smith, N., & Miller, J. L. (2013). The influence of teachers’ knowledge on student learning in middle school physical science classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1020–1049.Google Scholar

Sajaniemi, J., & Kuittinen, M. (2005). An experiment on using roles of variables in teaching introductory programming. Computer Science Education, 15(1), 59–82.Google Scholar

Samuels, S. J. (1979). The method of repeated readings. The Reading Teacher, 32(4), 403–408.Google Scholar

Sanders, K., & Thomas, L. (2007). Checklists for grading object-oriented CS1 programs: Concepts and misconceptions. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE ‘07) (pp. 166–170). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Sawyer, R. K. (2014). Introduction: The new science of learning. In Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, 2nd edn. (pp. 1–18). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Seppälä, O., Malmi, , , L., & Korhonen, A. (2006). Observations on student misconceptions – A case study of the build-heap algorithm. Computer Science Education, 16(3), 241–255.Google Scholar

Sfard, A. (1995). The development of algebra: Confronting historical and psychological perspectives. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14(1), 15–39.Google Scholar

Shah, N. (2017). Race, ideology, and academic ability: A relational analysis of racial narratives in mathematics. Teachers College Record, 119(7), 1–42.Google Scholar

Smagorinsky, P., & Mayer, R. E. (2014). Learning to be literate. In Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, 2nd edn. (pp. 605–625). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, III, J. P., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115–163.Google Scholar

Soloway, E. (1986). Learning to program = learning to construct mechanisms and explanations. Communications of the ACM, 29(9), 850–858.Google Scholar

Spohrer, J. G., & Soloway, E. (1986). Analyzing the high frequency bugs in novice programs. In Papers Presented at the First Workshop on Empirical Studies of Programmers (pp. 230–251). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Stahl, S. A., & Heubach, K. M. (2005). Fluency-oriented reading instruction. Journal of Literacy Research, 37(1), 25–60.Google Scholar

Stephens-Martinez, K., Ju, A., Parashar, K., Ongowarsito, R., Jain, N., Venkat, S., & Fox, A. (2017). Taking advantage of scale by analyzing frequent constructed-response, code tracing wrong answers. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 56–64). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Stevens, R., O'Connor, K., Garrison, L., Jocuns, A., & Amos, D. M. (2008). Becoming an engineer: Toward a three dimensional view of engineering learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 355–368.Google Scholar

Vahrenhold, J., & Paul, W. (2014). Developing and validating test items for first-year computer science courses. Computer Science Education, 24(4), 304–333.Google Scholar

von Sydow, M. (2006). Towards a Flexible Bayesian and Deontic Logic of Testing Descriptive and Prescriptive Rules: Explaining Content Effects in the Wason Selection Task (PhD dissertation). University of Göttingen.Google Scholar

Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24(4), 535–585.Google Scholar

Wason, P. C. (1968). Reasoning about a rule. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20(3), 273–281.Google Scholar

Wason, P. C., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1972). Psychology of Reasoning: Structure and Content. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Webb, K. C., & Taylor, C. (2014). Developing a pre- and post-course concept inventory to gauge operating systems learning. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE 2014) (pp. 103–108). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Willingham, D. T., Hughes, E. M., & Dobolyi, D. G. (2015). The scientific status of learning styles theories. Teaching of Psychology, 42(3), 266–271.Google Scholar

Winslow, L. E. (1996). Programming pedagogy – A psychological overview. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 28(3), 17–22.Google Scholar

Witzel, B. S., Riccomini, P. J., & Schneider, E. (2008). Implementing CRA with secondary students with learning disabilities in mathematics. Intervention in School and Clinic, 43(5), 270–276.Google Scholar

Wortham, S. (2006). Learning Identity: The Joint Emergence of Social Identification and Academic Learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Young, R. M., & O’Shea, T. (1981). Errors in children’s subtraction. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 153–177.Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, E. D. (1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121(2), 219–245.Google Scholar

Almstrum, V. L. et al. (2005). Challenges to computer science education research. In Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE ‘05) (pp. 191–192). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Andrew, S. (1998). Self-efficacy as a predictor of academic performance in science. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 27(3), 596–603.Google Scholar

Axelson, R. D., & Flick, A. (2011). Defining student engagement. Change (January/February), 38–43.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (Ed.) (1995). Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.Google Scholar

Barker, R. J., & Unger, E. A. (1983). A predictor for success in an introductory programming class based upon abstract reasoning development. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 15(1), 154–8.Google Scholar

Bennedsen, J., & Caspersen, M. E. (2005). An investigation of potential success factors for an introductory model-driven programming course. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Computing Education Research (ICER ‘05) (pp. 155–163). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Bergin, S., & Reilly, R. (2005). Programming: Factors that influence success. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 37(1), 411–5.Google Scholar

Bernstein, D. R. (1991). Comfort and experience with computing: Are they the same for women and men? ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 23(3), 57–61.Google Scholar

Beyer, S. (2008). Predictors of female and male computer science students’ grades. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 14(4), 377–409.Google Scholar

Bhardwaj, J. (2017). In search of self-efficacy: Development of a new instrument for first year Computer Science students. Computer Science Education, 27(2), 79–99.Google Scholar

Blaney, J. M., Hall, M., Plaza, P., & Stout, J. G. (2017). Examining the relationship between introductory computing course experiences, self-efficacy, and belonging among first-generation college women. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ‘17) (pp. 69–74). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Bouffard, T., Boisvert, J., Vezeau, C., & Larouche, C. (1995). The impact of goal orientation on self-regulation and performance among college students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 317–329.Google Scholar

Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485–499.Google Scholar

Brunello, G., & Schlotter, M. (2011). Non Cognitive Skills and Personality Traits: Labour Market Relevance and their Development in Education and Training Systems. IZA Discussion paper 5743. Bonn, Germany: The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).Google Scholar

Busch, T. (1995). Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(2), 147–158.Google Scholar

Carter, L. (2006). Why students with an apparent aptitude for computer science don’t choose to major in computer science. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 38(1), 27–31.Google Scholar