Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T22:19:12.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 1 - Human Brain Development

Implications for Maladies of the Male Mind

from Section 1 - The Developmental Context and Developmental Disorders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2021

David Castle
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
David Coghill
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Get access

Summary

As you work through the chapters in this book it will become very clear that since the beginning of the ‘decade of the brain’ in 1990 we have made considerable progress in understanding how the brain works and the way that it develops across the lifespan. We have also made significant progress in understanding the genetic and environmental factors that contribute to the development of mental health problems. We still, however, struggle to develop new and innovative treatments and therapies and in our understanding of what works for whom in what circumstances – more recently labelled precision or personalized medicine. There are, of course, many factors that contribute to this lack of concrete progress. Psychiatric disorders are complex and heterogeneous across several levels of analysis: phenotypically, with co-morbidity being the rule rather than the exception; aetiologically, with a complex genetic architecture based on different types of genetic variants and gene–environment interplay and diverse brain alterations. Also, as there is no stable, agreed-upon, and biologically valid construct for any of the recognized psychiatric disorders, the current taxonomy provides an unclear basis for informed biological research. Attempts to define biologically homogeneous subtypes (‘biotypes’) or pathophysiological dimensions of psychiatric disorders are under way but have yet to deliver (Feczko et al., 2019). From another angle, enormous scientific challenges are still presented by the complexity of the brain’s architecture and physiology, our far from complete understanding of how these change across development, and the relationships between structure and function and between cognition and behaviour/symptoms. These continue to present enormous scientific challenges.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alonso-Nanclares, L., Gonzalez-Soriano, J., Rodriguez, J. R., and Defelipe, J. 2008. Gender differences in human cortical synaptic density. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 105, 14615-9.Google Scholar
Arnold, A. P. 2012. The end of gonad-centric sex determination in mammals. Trends Genet, 28, 5561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnold, A. P., Reue, K., Eghbali, M., Vilain, E., Chen, X., Ghahramani, N., Itoh, Y., Li, J., Link, J. C., Ngun, T., and Williams-Burris, S. M. 2016. The importance of having two X chromosomes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 371, doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0113.Google Scholar
Arnold, A. P., Xu, J., Grisham, W., Chen, X., Kim, Y. H., and Itoh, Y. 2004. Minireview: Sex chromosomes and brain sexual differentiation. Endocrinology, 145, 1057–62.Google Scholar
Barraclough, C. A. and Gorski, R. A. 1961. Evidence that the hypothalamus is responsible for androgen-induced sterility in the female rat. Endocrinology, 68, 6879.Google Scholar
Berletch, J. B., Yang, F., and Disteche, C. M. 2010. Escape from X inactivation in mice and humans. Genome Biol, 11, 213.Google Scholar
Burgoyne, P. S., Thornhill, A. R., Boudrean, S. K., Darling, S. M., Bishop, C. E., and Evans, E. P. 1995. The genetic basis of XX–XY differences present before gonadal sex differentiation in the mouse. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 350, 253–60, 260–1.Google Scholar
Clayden, J. D., Jentschke, S., Munoz, M., Cooper, J. M., Chadwick, M. J., Banks, T., Clark, C. A., and Vargha-Khadem, F. 2012. Normative development of white matter tracts: similarities and differences in relation to age, gender, and intelligence. Cereb Cortex, 22, 1738–47.Google Scholar
Coghill, D. 2010. Heterogeneity in ADHD. MD thesis, University of Dundee.Google Scholar
Conklin, H. M., Luciana, M., Hooper, C. J., and Yarger, R. S. 2007. Working memory performance in typically developing children and adolescents: behavioral evidence of protracted frontal lobe development. Dev Neuropsychol, 31, 103–28.Google Scholar
De Bellis, M. D., Keshavan, M. S., Beers, S. R., Hall, J., Frustaci, K., Masalehdan, A., Noll, J., and Boring, A. M. 2001. Sex differences in brain maturation during childhood and adolescence. Cereb Cortex, 11, 552–7.Google Scholar
De Vries, G. J. 2004. Minireview: Sex differences in adult and developing brains: compensation, compensation, compensation. Endocrinology, 145, 1063–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Vries, G. J., Rissman, E. F., Simerly, R. B., Yang, L. Y., Scordalakes, E. M., Auger, C. J., Swain, A., Lovell-Badge, R., Burgoyne, P. S., and Arnold, A. P. 2002. A model system for study of sex chromosome effects on sexually dimorphic neural and behavioral traits. J Neurosci, 22, 9005–14.Google Scholar
Feczko, E., Miranda-Dominguez, O., Marr, M., Graham, A. M., Nigg, J. T., and Fair, D. A. 2019. The heterogeneity problem: approaches to identify psychiatric subtypes. Trends Cogn Sci, 23, 584601.Google Scholar
Giedd, J. N., Castellanos, F. X., Rajapakse, J. C., Vaituzis, A. C., and Rapoport, J. L. 1997. Sexual dimorphism of the developing human brain. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry, 21, 1185–201.Google Scholar
Gur, R. C., Richard, J., Hughett, P., Calkins, M. E., Macy, L., Bilker, W. B., Brensinger, C., and Gur, R. E. 2010. A cognitive neuroscience-based computerized battery for efficient measurement of individual differences: standardization and initial construct validation. J Neurosci Methods, 187, 254–62.Google Scholar
Hedges, L. V. and Nowell, A. 1995. Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41–5.Google Scholar
Herting, M. M., Maxwell, E. C., Irvine, C., and Nagel, B. J. 2012. The impact of sex, puberty, and hormones on white matter microstructure in adolescents. Cereb Cortex, 22, 1979–92.Google Scholar
Hsu, J. L., Leemans, A., Bai, C. H., Lee, C. H., Tsai, Y. F., Chiu, H. C., and Chen, W. H. 2008. Gender differences and age-related white matter changes of the human brain: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Neuroimage, 39, 566–77.Google Scholar
Im, K., Lee, J. M., Lyttelton, O., Kim, S. H., Evans, A. C., and Kim, S. I. 2008. Brain size and cortical structure in the adult human brain. Cereb Cortex, 18, 2181–91.Google Scholar
Ingalhalikar, M., Smith, A., Parker, D., Satterthwaite, T. D., Elliott, M. A., Ruparel, K., Hakonarson, H., Gur, R. E., Gur, R. C., and Verma, R. 2014. Sex differences in the structural connectome of the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 111, 823–8.Google Scholar
Joel, D. and Mccarthy, M. M. 2017. Incorporating sex as a biological variable in neuropsychiatric research: where are we now and where should we be? Neuropsychopharmacology, 42, 379–85.Google Scholar
Kanaan, R. A., Allin, M., Picchioni, M., Barker, G. J., Daly, E., Shergill, S. S., Woolley, J., and Mcguire, P. K. 2012. Gender differences in white matter microstructure. PLoS One, 7, e38272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koopman, P. 1999. Sry and Sox9: mammalian testis-determining genes. Cell Mol Life Sci, 55, 839–56.Google Scholar
Lenroot, R. K. and Giedd, J. N. 2010. Sex differences in the adolescent brain. Brain Cogn, 72, 4655.Google Scholar
Lenroot, R. K., Gogtay, N., Greenstein, D. K., Wells, E. M., Wallace, G. L., Clasen, L. S., Blumenthal, J. D., Lerch, J., Zijdenbos, A. P., Evans, A. C., Thompson, P. M., and Giedd, J. N. 2007. Sexual dimorphism of brain developmental trajectories during childhood and adolescence. Neuroimage, 36, 1065–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mccarthy, M. M. 2016. Sex differences in the developing brain as a source of inherent risk. Dialogues Clin Neurosci, 18, 361–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreno-Briseno, P., Diaz, R., Campos-Romo, A., and Fernandez-Ruiz, J. 2010. Sex-related differences in motor learning and performance. Behav Brain Funct, 6, 74.Google Scholar
Morris, R. C., Evendon, J. L., Sahakian, B. J., and Robbins, T. W. 1987. Computer-aided assessment of dementia: comparative studies of neuropsychological deficits in Alzheimer-type dementia and Parkinson’s disease. In: Stahl, S. M., Iversen, S. D., and Goodman, E. D. (eds) Cognitive Neurochemistry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neufang, S., Specht, K., Hausmann, M., Gunturkun, O., Herpertz-Dahlmann, B., Fink, G. R., and Konrad, K. 2009. Sex differences and the impact of steroid hormones on the developing human brain. Cereb Cortex, 19, 464–73.Google Scholar
Nopoulos, P., Flaum, M., O’Leary, D., and Andreasen, N. C. 2000. Sexual dimorphism in the human brain: evaluation of tissue volume, tissue composition and surface anatomy using magnetic resonance imaging. Psychiatry Res, 98, 113.Google Scholar
Nugent, B. M., Wright, C. L., Shetty, A. C., Hodes, G. E., Lenz, K. M., Mahurkar, A., Russo, S. J., Devine, S. E., and Mccarthy, M. M. 2015. Brain feminization requires active repression of masculinization via DNA methylation. Nat Neurosci, 18, 690–7.Google Scholar
Oberlander, J. G. and Woolley, C. S. 2016. 17beta-estradiol acutely potentiates glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the hippocampus through distinct mechanisms in males and females. J Neurosci, 36, 2677–90.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, S., Noseworthy, M. D., Levine, B., and Dennis, M. 2005. Cortical thickness of the frontopolar area in typically developing children and adolescents. Neuroimage, 24, 948–54.Google Scholar
Pakkenberg, B. and Gundersen, H. J. 1997. Neocortical neuron number in humans: effect of sex and age. J Comp Neurol, 384, 312–20.Google Scholar
Peper, J. S., Brouwer, R. M., Schnack, H. G., Van Baal, G. C., Van Leeuwen, M., Van Den Berg, S. M., Delemarre-Van De Waal, H. A., Boomsma, D. I., Kahn, R. S., and Hulshoff Pol, H. E. 2009. Sex steroids and brain structure in pubertal boys and girls. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34, 332–42.Google Scholar
Phoenix, C. H., Goy, R. W., Gerall, A. A., and Young, W. C. 1959. Organizing action of prenatally administered testosterone propionate on the tissues mediating mating behavior in the female guinea pig. Endocrinology, 65, 369–82.Google Scholar
Pickering, S. J. 2001. The development of visuo-spatial working memory. Memory, 9, 423–32.Google Scholar
Ray, P. F., Conaghan, J., Winston, R. M., and Handyside, A. H. 1995. Increased number of cells and metabolic activity in male human preimplantation embryos following in vitro fertilization. J Reprod Fertil, 104, 165–71.Google Scholar
Reardon, P. K., Clasen, L., Giedd, J. N., Blumenthal, J., Lerch, J. P., Chakravarty, M. M., and Raznahan, A. 2016. An allometric analysis of sex and sex chromosome dosage effects on subcortical anatomy in humans. J Neurosci, 36, 2438–48.Google Scholar
Salat, D. H., Buckner, R. L., Snyder, A. Z., Greve, D. N., Desikan, R. S., Busa, E., Morris, J. C., Dale, A. M., and Fischl, B. 2004. Thinning of the cerebral cortex in aging. Cereb Cortex, 14, 721–30.Google Scholar
Salthouse, T. A. 2004. Localizing age-related individual differences in a hierarchical structure. Intelligence, 32.Google Scholar
Schmithorst, V. J., Holland, S. K., and Dardzinski, B. J. 2008. Developmental differences in white matter architecture between boys and girls. Hum Brain Mapp, 29, 696710.Google Scholar
Schwarz, A. J., Gozzi, A., and Bifone, A. 2008. Community structure and modularity in networks of correlated brain activity. Magn Reson Imaging, 26, 914–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shors, T. J. 2016. A trip down memory lane about sex differences in the brain. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 371, doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0124.Google Scholar
Voyer, D., Voyer, S., and Bryden, M. P. 1995. Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychol Bull, 117, 250–70.Google Scholar
Zechner, U., Wilda, M., Kehrer-Sawatzki, H., Vogel, W., Fundele, R., and Hameister, H. 2001. A high density of X-linked genes for general cognitive ability: a run-away process shaping human evolution? Trends Genet, 17, 697701.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×