Jonsen, A. R. A Short History of Medical Ethics. New York, Oxford, 2000.Google Scholar

Starr, P. The Social Transformation of American Medicine. New York, Basic/Perseus, 1984.Google Scholar

Pinkus, R. L. Politics, paternalism, and the rise of the neurosurgeon: the evolution of moral reasoning. Med. Humanit. Rev. 1996; Fall: 20–44.Google Scholar

Long, D. M. The founding philosophy of neurosurgery. In Philosophy of Neurological Surgery. Awad, I, ed. Park Ridge, AANS, 1995.Google Scholar

Greenblatt, S. H. Neurosurgery’s ideals in historical perspective. In Philosophy of Neurological Surgery. Awad, I, ed. Park Ridge, AANS, 1995.Google Scholar

Harbaugh, R. E. Neurosurgery’s founding principles: the 2015 AANS presidential address. J. Neurosurg. 2015; 123: 1351–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Maxwell, R. E. Patient-centered neurosurgery. In Philosophy of Neurological Surgery. I. Awad, ed. Park Ridge, AANS, 1995.Google Scholar

Awad, I. A. Conceptual synthesis: elements of a philosophy of neurological surgery. In Philosophy of Neurological Surgery. Awad, I, ed. Park Ridge, AANS, 1995.Google Scholar

Agarwal, P., Sarris, C. E, Herschman, Y., Agaral, N., et al. Schizophrenia and neurosurgery: a dark past with hope of a brighter future. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2016; 34: 53–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Caruso, J. P., Sheehan, J. P. Psychosurgery, ethics, and media: a history of Walter Freeman and the lobotomy. Neurosurg. Focus 2017; 43(3): E6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gross, D., Schafer, G. Egas Moniz (1874–1955) and the ‘invention’ of modern psychosurgery: a historical and ethical reanalysis under special consideration of Portuguese original sources. Neurosurg. Focus 2011; 30(2): E8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jonsen, A. R. The birth of bioethics. New York, Oxford, 1998.Google Scholar

Sedney, C. L., Bernstein, M. Wilder Penfield – bioethicist. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 2014; 41: 177–81.Google Scholar

Proceedings: Dartmouth Convocation on Great Issues of Conscience in Modern Medicine. The Dartmouth Convocation in Hanover. 8–10 September 1960.Google Scholar

Lewis, J. Something Hidden: A Biography of Wilder Penfield. Garden City, Doubleday, 1981.Google Scholar

Fins, J. J. A leg to stand on: Sir William Osler and Wilder Penfield’s ‘neuroethics’. Am. J. Bioeth. 2008; 8(1): 37–46.Google Scholar

Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death. A definition of irreversible coma. JAMA 1968; 205(6): 337–40.Google Scholar

Malchesky, P. S., Robert, J. White: renowned neurosurgeon, author, bioethicist, medical adviser to popes. A man for all seasons. Artificial Organs. 2011; 35(1): 1–3.Google Scholar

Patterson, R. H. A code of ethics; the 1986 AANS presidential address. J. Neurosurg. 1986; 65: 271–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

AANS Board of Directors. AANS Code of Ethics. Revised 2014. Available at: www.aans.org/-/media/Images/AANS/Header/Govenance/AANS_Code_of_Ethics_11–22-2014.ashx?la=en&hash=124B159D6B41ACF78DFB0110EB55B10E68D5D3DD.Google Scholar

WFNS Committee for Ethics and Medico-Legal Affairs. Statement of Ethics in Neurosurgery. Revised 2007. Available at: www.wfns.org/WFNSData/Document/Statement_of_Ethics_in_Neurosurgery.pdf.Google Scholar

Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Gray, J. A., et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2007; 455: 3–5.Google Scholar

Yarascavitch, B. A., Chuback, J. E., Almenawer, S. A., et al. Levels of evidence in the neurosurgical literature: more tribulations than trials. Neurosurgery 2012; 71: 1131–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bhandari, M., Joensson, A. Clinical Research for Surgeons. New York, Thieme, 2009.Google Scholar

Haines, S. Evidence-based practice of neurosurgery: implications for quality and safety. In Guillaume, D., Hunt, M., eds. Quality and Safety in Neurosurgery. 1st ed. Minneapolis, Elsevier, 2018: 98–105.Google Scholar

Fletcher, R. H., Fletcher, S. W., Fletcher, G. S. Clinical Epidemiology: The Essentials. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005.Google Scholar

Esene, I. N., El-Shehaby, A. M., Baeesa, S. S. Essentials of research methods in neurosurgery and allied sciences for research, appraisal and application of scientific information to patient care (Part I). Neurosciences (Riyadh) 2016; 21: 97–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Linskey, M. E. Evidence-based medicine for neurosurgeons: introduction and methodology. Prog. Neurol. Surg. 2006; 19: 1–53.Google Scholar

Esene, I. N., Baeesa, S. S., Ammar, A. Evidence-based neurosurgery. Basic concepts for the appraisal and application of scientific information to patient care (Part II). Neurosciences (Riyadh) 2016; 21: 197–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ho, P. M., Peterson, P. N., Masoudi, F. A. Evaluating the evidence: is there a rigid hierarchy? Circulation 2008; 118: 1675–84.Google Scholar

Haines, S. J. Evidence-based neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 2003; 52: 36–47.Google Scholar

Kaiser, M. G., Eck, J. C., Groff, M. W., et al. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 1: introduction and methodology. J. Neurosurg. Spine 2014; 21: 2–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carney, N. A., B. T. Foundation. Surgeons AAoN, Surgeons CoN, Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care AANSC. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. Methods. J. Neurotrauma 2007; 24 Suppl 1: S3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, P. D., Kalkanis, S. N., Linskey, M. E., et al. Methodology used to develop the AANS/CNS management of brain metastases evidence-based clinical practice parameter guidelines. J. Neurooncol. 2010; 96: 11–16.Google Scholar

Akobeng, A. K. Understanding randomised controlled trials. Arch. Dis. Child 2005; 90: 840–4.Google Scholar

Carney, N., Totten, A. M., O’Reilly, C., et al. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. Neurosurgery 2017; 80: 6–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vandenbroucke, J. P. STREGA, STROBE, STARD, SQUIRE, MOOSE, PRISMA, GNOSIS, TREND, ORION, COREQ, QUOROM, REMARK … and CONSORT: for whom does the guideline toll? J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2009; 62: 594–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mannocci, A., Saulle, R., Colamesta, V., et al. What is the impact of reporting guidelines on Public Health journals in Europe? The case of STROBE, CONSORT and PRISMA. J. Public Health (Oxf.). 2015; 37: 737–40.Google ScholarPubMed

Kochanek, P. M., Carney, N., et al. Guidelines for the acute medical management of severe traumatic brain injury in infants, children, and adolescents-second edition. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med. 2012; 13 Suppl 1: S1–82.Google Scholar

Eddy, D. M. Clinical decision-making: from theory to practice. Designing a practice policy. Standards, guidelines, and options. JAMA 1990; 263: 3077, 81–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Greenberg, S. Handbook of Neurosurgery. 8th ed. New York, Thieme, 2016.Google Scholar

Anderson, P. A., Matz, P. G., Groff, M. W., et al. Laminectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical degenerative myelopathy. J. Neurosurg. Spine 2009; 11: 150–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rosenberg, J., Greenberg, M. K. Practice parameters: strategies for survival into the nineties. Neurology 1992; 42: 1110–15.Google Scholar

Guyatt, G., Oxman, A. D., Akl, E. A., et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2011; 64: 383–94.Google Scholar

Amanda, B. What Is Critical Appraisal? 2nd ed. Calgary, Hayward Medical Communications, 2012.Google Scholar

Poolman, R. W., Petrisor, B. A., Marti, R. K., et al. Misconceptions about practicing evidence-based orthopedic surgery. Acta. Orthop. 2007; 78: 2–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Grol, R., Between evidence-based practice and total quality management: the implementation of cost-effective care. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 2000; 12: 297–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Timmermans, S., Mauck, A. The promises and pitfalls of evidence-based medicine. Health Aff. (Millwood) 2005; 24: 18–28.Google Scholar

Charlton, B. G. Restoring the balance: evidence-based medicine put in its place. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 1997; 3: 87–98.Google Scholar

Beauchamp, T. L., Childress, J. F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 6th ed. New York, Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Faden, R., Shebaya, S. Public Health Ethics, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2016 Edition, Ed. Zalta, E. N. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/publichealth-ethics.Google Scholar

Mandonnet, E., Taillandier, L., Duffau, H. Proposal of screening for diffuse low-grade gliomas in the population from 20 to 40 years. Presse. Med. 2017; 46: 911–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emanuel, E. J., Wendler, D., Grady, C. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA 2000; 283: 2701–11.Google Scholar

Broekman, M. L., Carrière, M. E., Bredenoord, A. L. Surgical innovation: the ethical agenda. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95: e3790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brennum, J., Engelmann, C. M., Thomsen, J. A., et al. Glioma surgery with intraoperative mapping-balancing the onco-functional choice. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2018; 160: 1043–50.Google Scholar

Cote, D. J., Balak, N., Brennum, J., et al. Ethical difficulties in the innovative surgical treatment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J. Neurosurg. 2017; 126: 2045–50.Google Scholar

Brennum, J., Maier, C. M., Almdal, K., et al. Primo non nocere or maximum survival in grade 2 gliomas? A medical ethical question. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014; 157: 155–64.Google Scholar

Muskens, I. S., Diedersen, S. J. H., Senders, J. T., et al. Innovation in neurosurgery: less than IDEAL? A systematic review. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2017; 159: 1957–66.Google Scholar

Muskens, I. S., Gupta, S., Hulsbergen, A., et al. Introduction of novel medical devices in surgery: ethical challenges of current oversight and regulation. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2017; 225: 556–8.Google Scholar

Gupta, S., Muskens, I. S., Fandino, L. B., et al. Oversight in surgical innovation: a response to ethical challenges. World J. Surg. 2018; 42: 2773–80.Google Scholar

Zaki, M. M., Cote, D. J., Muskens, I. S., et al. Defining innovation in neurosurgery: results from an international survey. World Neurosurg. 2018; 114: e1038–48.Google Scholar

Bratton, S. L., Chestnut, R. M., Ghajar, J., et al. Brain trauma foundation; American association of neurological surgeons; congress of neurological surgeons; joint section on neurotrauma and critical care, AANS/CNS. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma. 2007; 24, suppl. 1s.Google Scholar

Honeybul, S., An update on the management of traumatic brain injury. J. Neurosurg. Sci. 2011; 55: 343–55.Google Scholar

Chesnut, R. M., Temkin, N., Carney, N., et al. A trial of intracranial-pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012; 367: 2471–81.Google Scholar

Honeybul, S. Reconsidering the role of hypothermia in management of severe traumatic brain injury. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2016; 28: 12–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cooper, D. J., Rosenfeld, J. V., Murray, L., et al. Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury. the DECRA Trial Investigators and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011; 364: 1493–1502.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, P. J., Kolias, A. G., Timofeev, I. S., et al. RESCUEicp trial collaborators. Trial of decompressive craniectomy for traumatic intracranial hypertension. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016; 375: 1119–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Honeybul, S., Ho, K. M., Gillett, G. R. Long-term outcome following decompressive craniectomy: an inconvenient truth? Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 2018; 24: 97–104.Google Scholar

Honeybul, S., Gillett, G. R., Ho, K. M., et al. Is life worth living? Decompressive craniectomy and the disability paradox. J. Neurosurg. 2016; 125: 775–8.Google Scholar

Perel, P., Arango, M., Clayton, T., et al. Predicting outcome after brain injury: Practical prognostic models based on a large cohort of international patients. BMJ 2008; 336: 425–9.Google Scholar

Murray, G. D., Butcher, I., McHugh, G. S., et al. Multivariable prognostic analysis in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. J. Neurotrauma 2007; 24: 329–37.Google Scholar

Honeybul, S., Ho, K. M. Predicting long-term neurological outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury requiring decompressive craniectomy: A comparison of the CRASH and IMPACT prognostic models. Injury 2016; 47: 1886–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Moussaddy, A., Demchuk, A. M., Hill, M. D. Thrombolytic therapies for ischaemic stroke: triumphs and future challenges. Neuropharmacology 2018; 134(part B): 272–9.Google Scholar

Goyal, M., Menon, B. K., van Zwam, W. H., et al. HERMES collaborators. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet 2016; 387: 1723–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bhatia, R., Hill, M. D., Shobha, N., et al. Low rates of acute recanalization with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in ischaemic stroke: real-world experience and a call for action. Stroke 2010; 41: 2254–8.Google Scholar

Vahedi, K., Vicaut, E., Mateo, J., et al. DECIMAL Investigators. Sequential-design, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of early decompressive craniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction (DECIMAL Trial). Stroke 2007; 38: 2506–17.Google Scholar

Jüttler, E., Schwab, S., Schmiedek, P., et al. DESTINY study group. Decompressive surgery for the treatment of malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery (destiny): a randomized, controlled trial. Stroke 2007; 38: 2518–25.Google Scholar

Hofmeijer, J., Kappelle, L. J., Algra, A., et al. HAMLET investigators. Surgical decompression for space-occupying cerebral infarction (the Hemicraniectomy After Middle Cerebral Artery infarction with Life-threatening Edema Trial [HAMLET]): a multicentre, open, randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2009; 8: 326–33.Google Scholar

Vahedi, K., Hofmeijer, J., Juettler, E., et al. DECIMAL, DESTINY, and HAMLET investigators. Early decompressive surgery in malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery: a pooled analysis of three randomised controlled trials. Lancet Neurol 2007; 6: 215–22.Google Scholar

Jüttler, E., Unterberg, A., Woitzik, J., et al. DESTINY II Investigators. Hemicraniectomy in older patients with extensive middle-cerebral-artery stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014; 370: 1091–100.Google Scholar

Honeybul, S., Ho, K. M., Gillett, G. Outcome following decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant cerebral infarction: ethical considerations. Stroke 2015; 46: 2695–8.Google Scholar

Honeybul, S., Ho, K. M., Gillett, G. R. Long-term outcome following decompressive craniectomy: An inconvenient truth? Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 2018; 24: 97–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beauchamp, T. L., Childress, J. F. The meaning and justification of informed consent. In Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th ed. New York, Oxford University Press, 2001, 69–98.Google Scholar

Dworkin, R. Life past reason. In Life’s Dominion: An Argument about Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom. New York, Alfred A. Knopf, 1993, 218–37.Google Scholar

Honeybul, S., Ho, K. M., Blacker, B. W., ORACLE stroke study: opinion regarding acceptable outcome following decompressive hemicraniectomy for ischaemic stroke. Neurosurgery 2016; 79: 231–6.Google Scholar

Olivecrona, M., Honeybul, S. A study of the opinions of Swedish healthcare personnel regarding acceptable outcome following decompressive hemicraniectomy for ischaemic stroke. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2018; 160: 95–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Guglielmi, G. History of the genesis of detachable coils. J. Neurosurg. 2009; 111: 1–8.Google Scholar

Koivisto, T., Vanninen, R., Hurskainen, H., et al. Outcomes of early endovascular versus surgical treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. A prospective randomized study. Stroke 2000; 31: 2369–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Molyneux, A., Kerr, R., Stratton, I., et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 1267–74.Google Scholar

McDougall, C. G., Spetzler, R. F., Zabramski, J. M., et al. The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial. J. Neurosurg. 2012; 116: 135–44.Google Scholar

Clifton, G. L., Miller, E. R., Choi, S. C., et al. Lack of effect of induction of hypothermia after acute brain injury. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001; 344: 556–63.Google Scholar

Clifton, G. L., Valadka, A., Zygun, D., et al. Very early hypothermia induction in patients with severe brain injury (the National Acute Brain Injury Study: Hypothermia II): a randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2011; 10: 131–9.Google Scholar

Roberts, I., Yates, D., Sandercock, P., et al. CRASH trial collaborators. Effect of intravenous corticosteroids on death within 14 days in 10008 adults with clinically significant head injury (MRC CRASH trial): randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 364: 1321–8.Google ScholarPubMed

Darsaut, T. E., Jack, A. S., Kerr, R. S., et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial – ISAT part II: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2013; 14: 156.Google Scholar

Yamasaki, M. Life and medical ethics in pediatric neurosurgery. Neurol. Med. Chir. (Tokyo) 2017; 57: 101–5.Google Scholar

McDonald, P., Gupta, N., Peacock, W. Ethical issues in pediatric neurosurgery. In Principles and Practice of Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2nd ed., Albright, A. L., Adelson, P. D., Pollack, I. F., eds. New York: Thieme; 2008.Google Scholar

McLone, D. G. The diagnosis, prognosis, and outcome for the handicapped newborn: a neonatal view. Issues Law Med. 1986; 2: 15–24.Google Scholar

Ingraham, F. D., Matson, D. D. Neurosurgery of Infancy and Childhood. Springfield, IL, Charles C. Thomas, 1954.Google Scholar

Lorber, J. Selective treatment of myelomeningocele: To treat or not to treat? Pediatrics 1974; 53: 307–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Taylor, A., Butt, W., Rosenfeld, J., et al. A randomised trial of very early decompressive craniectomy in children with traumatic brain injury and sustained intracranial hypertension. Childs Nerv. Syst. 2001; 17: 154–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Adzick, N. S., Thom, E. A., Spong, C. Y., et al. MOMS Investigators. A randomised trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011; 364: 993–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verhagen, E., Sauer, P. J. The Groningen protocol: euthanasia in severely ill newborns. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005; 352: 959–62.Google Scholar

Nakagawa, T. A., Ashwal, S., Mathur, M., et al. Committee for Determination of Brain Death in Infants’ guidelines for the determination of brain death in infants and children: an update of the 1987 task force recommendations – executive summary. Ann. Neurol. 2012; 71: 573–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Katz, A. L., Webb, S. A. Committee on bioethics. Informed consent in decision-making in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 2016; 138(2).Google Scholar

Barry, S. Quality of life and myelomeningocele: an ethical and evidence-based analysis of the Groningen Protocol. Pediatr. Neurosurg. 2010; 46: 409–14.Google Scholar

Cote, D. J., Balak, N., Brennum, J., et al. Ethical difficulties in the innovative surgical treatment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J. Neurosurg. 2017; 126: 2045–50.Google Scholar

Park, J., Park, H. Surgical informed consent process in neurosurgery. J. Korean Neurosurg. Soc. 2017; 60(4): 385–90.Google Scholar

Kelly, M. P., Lenke, L. G., Godzik, J., et al. Retrospective analysis underestimates neurological deficits in complex spinal deformity surgery; a Scoli-RISK-1 Study. J. Neurosurg. Spine 2017; 27 : 68–73.Google Scholar

Scheer, J. K., Keefe, M., Lafage, V., et al. Importance of patient-reported individualized goals when assessing outcomes for adult spinal deformity (ASD): initial experience with a Patient Generated Index. Spine J. 2017; 17(10): 1397–1405.Google Scholar

Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of Innovations. New York, Free Press, 2003.Google Scholar

United States Senate Finance Committee. Staff report on Medtronic’s influence on INFUSE clinical studies. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health 2013; 19(2): 67–76.Google Scholar

Walcott, B. P., Sheth, S. A., Nahed, B. V., et al. Conflict of interest in spine research reporting. PLoS One 2012; 7(8): e44327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bartels, R. H., Delye, H., Boogaarts, J. Financial disclosures of authors involved in spine research: an underestimated source of bias. Eur. Spine J. 2012; 21 : 1229–33.Google Scholar

Janssen, S. J., Bredenoord, A. L., Dhert, W., et al. Potential conflicts of interest of editorial board members from five leading spine journals. PLoS One 2015; 10(6): e0127362.Google Scholar

Weiner, B. K., Hurwitz, E. L., Schoene, M. L., et al. Moving forward after YODA. Spine J. 2013; 13 : 995–7.Google Scholar

Lenza, M., Buchbinder, R., Staples, M. P., et al. Second opinion for degenerative spinal conditions: an option or a necessity? A prospective observational study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord. 2017; 18: 354.Google Scholar

Schallmo, M. S., Cook, R. W., Weiner, J. A., et al. Do demographic factors of spine surgeons affect the rate at which spinal fusion is performed on patients? Spine 2017; 42(16): 1261–6.Google Scholar

Yanamadala, V., Kim, Y., Buchlak, Q. D., et al. Multidisciplinary evaluation ideas to the decreased utilization of lumbar spine fusion: an observational cohort pilot study. Spine 2017; 42(17): E1016–23.Google Scholar

Schofferman, J. A., Eskay-Auerback, M. L., Sawyer, L. S., et al. Conflict of interest and professional medical associations: the North American Spine Society experience. Spine J. 2013; 13 : 974–9.Google Scholar

Bartels, R. H. Influence of industry on scientific reports. Eur. Spine. J. 2013; 22: 1690–1.Google Scholar

Burchiel, K. J. Deep brain stimulation and depression. J. Neurosurg. 2012; 116: 313–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Delaloye, S., Holtzheimer, P. E. Deep brain stimulation in the treatment of depression. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 2014; 16: 83–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kuhn, J., Gründler, T. O., Lenartz, J., et al. Deep brain stimulation for psychiatric disorders. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 2010; 107: 105–13.Google Scholar

Moro, E. Impulse control disorders and subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: are we jumping the gun? Eur. J. Neurol. 2009; 16: 440–1.Google Scholar

Schlaepfer, T. E., Bewernick, B., Kayser, S., et al. Modulating affect, cognition, and behavior – prospects of deep-brain stimulation for treatment – resistant psychiatric disorders. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2011; 5: 29.Google Scholar

Sen, A. N., Campbell, P. J., Yadla, S., et al. Deep brain stimulation in the management of disorders of consciousness: a review of physiology, previous reports, and ethical considerations. Neurosurg. Focus 2010; 29: E14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clausen, J. Ethical brain stimulation – neuroethics of deep brain stimulation in research and clinical practice. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2010; 32: 1152–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Heller, A. C., Amar, A. P., Liu, C. Y., et al. Surgery of the mind and mood: a mosaic of issues in time and evolution. Neurosurgery 2006; 59: 720–39.Google Scholar

Holtzheimer, P. E., Husain, M. M., Lisanby, S. H. et al. Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a multisite, randomised, sham-controlled trial. The Lancet Psychiatry 2017, 4(11): 839–48.Google Scholar

Egan, D. Adverse effects: The perils of deep brain stimulation for depression. Available at: https://www.madinamerica.com/2015/09/adverse-effects-perils-deep-brain-stimulation.Google Scholar

Gupta, A., Shepard, M. J., Xu, Z. et al. An international radiosurgery research foundation multicentre retrospective study of gamma ventral capsulotomy for obsessive compulsive disorder. Neurosurgery 2018; 85(6): 808–16. doi:10.1093/neuros/nyy536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heller, A. C., Amar, A. P., Liu, C. Y. et al. Surgery of the mind and mood: a mosaic of issues in time and evolution. Neurosurgery 2006; 59: 720–39.Google Scholar

Fins, J. From psychosurgery to neuromodulation and palliation: History’s lessons for the ethical conduct and regulation of neuropsychiatric research. Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am. 2003; 14: 303–19.Google Scholar

Hunt, G. P. The two accused: the psycho-biology of violence. Life, 21 June 1968. Available at: www.amazon.com/Life-Magazine-Accuese-Psycho-Biology-Violence/dp/B0013SHPPG.Google Scholar

Szasz, T. S. The Myth of Mental Illness: Foundations of a Theory of Personal Conduct. New York, Harper & Row, 1974.Google Scholar

Laing, R. D., Esterton, A. Sanity, Madness and the Family. London, Tavistock, 1964.Google Scholar

Laing, R. D. The Self and Others. Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1969.Google Scholar

Cooper, D. Psychiatry and Anti-Psychiatry. London, Tavistock, 1967.Google Scholar

Breggin, P. R. Psychosurgery as brain-disabling therapy. In Divergent Views in Psychiatry, eds. Dongier, M and Wittkower, E. Hagerstown, MD, Harper and Row, 1981, 302–26. Available at: http://breggin.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/psychosurgeryas.pbreggin.1981.pdf.Google Scholar

Editorial. ‘Psychosurgery.’ Lancet, July 8, 1972, pp. 69–70.Google Scholar

Ryan, J. K. US National Commission for Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioural Research. US Statut. Large. 1974; 88: 342–54.Google Scholar

Breggin, P. R. Psychosurgery for political purposes. Duquesne Law Review 1975; 13: 841–62.Google Scholar

Fisher, C. E., Dunn, L. B., Christopher, P. P., et al. The ethics of research on deep brain stimulation for depression: decisional capacity and therapeutic misconception. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2012; 1265: 69–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fuchsa, T., Schlimme, J. E. Embodiment and psychopathology: a phenomenological Perspective. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 2009; 22: 570–5.Google Scholar

Hansson, S. O. Implant ethics. J. Med. Ethics 2005; 31: 519–25.Google Scholar

Kringelbach, M. L., Aziz, T. Z. Neuroethical principles of deep-brain stimulation. World Neurosurg. 2011; 76: 518–19.Google Scholar

Lipsman, N., Giacobbe, P., Bernstein, M., et al. Informed consent for clinical trials of deep brain stimulation in psychiatric disease: challenges and implications for trial design. J. Med. Ethics 2012; 38: 107–11.Google Scholar

Lipsman, N., Glannon, W., Brain, mind and machine: what are the implications of deep brain stimulation for perceptions of personal identity, agency and free will? Bioethics 2013; 27: 465–70.Google Scholar

Rabins, P., Brian, S., Appleby, J. B., et al. Scientific and ethical issues related to deep brain stimulation for disorders of mood, behavior and thought. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2009; 66: 931–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schmitz-Luhn, B., Katzenmeier, C., Woopen, C. Law and ethics of deep brain stimulation. Int. J. Law and Psychiatry 2012; 35: 130–6.Google Scholar

Clausen, J. Ethical brain stimulation – neuroethics of deep brain stimulation in research and clinical practice. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2010; 32: 1152–62.Google Scholar

Cyron, D. Mental side effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for movement disorders: the futility of denial. Front Integr. Neurosci. 2016; 10: 17.Google Scholar

Herzog, J., Reiff, J., Krack, P., et al. Manic episode with psychotic symptoms induced by subthalamic nucleus stimulation in a patient with Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2003; 18: 1382–4.Google Scholar

Morgan, J. C., DiDonato, C. J., Iyer, S. S., et al. Self-stimulatory behavior associated with deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2006; 21: 283–5.Google Scholar

Schupbach, M., Gargiulo, M., Welter, M. L., et al. Neurosurgery in Parkinson disease: a distressed mind in a repaired body? Neurology 2006; 66: 1811–16.Google Scholar

Witt, K., Daniels, C., Reiff, J. et al. Neuropsychological and psychiatric changes after deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: a randomised, multicentre study. Lancet Neurol. 2008; 7: 605–14.Google Scholar

Voon, V., Krack, P., Lang, A. E. et al. A multicentre study on suicide outcomes following subthalamic stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. Brain 2008; 131: 2720–8.Google Scholar

Drapier, D., Drapier, S., Sauleau, P. et al. Does subthalamic nucleus stimulation induce apathy in Parkinson’s disease? J. Neurol. 2006; 253: 1083–91.Google Scholar

Florin, E., Muller, D., Pfeifer, J., et al. Subthalamic stimulation modulates self-estimation of patients with Parkinson’s disease and induces risk-seeking behaviour. Brain 2013; 136: 3271–81.Google Scholar

Schupbach, M., Gargiulo, M., Welter, M. L., et al. Neurosurgery in Parkinson disease: a distressed mind in a repaired body? Neurology 2006; 66: 1811–16.Google Scholar

Hobbs, D. What went wrong in the first-ever clinical trial of deep brain stimulation for depression? Available at: http://dig.com/2018/deep-brain-stimulation-depression-trial.Google Scholar

Pacholczyk, A. DBS makes you feel good! – why some of the ethical objections to the use of DBS for neuropsychiatric disorders and enhancement are not convincing. Front Integr. Neurosci. 2011; 5: 14.Google Scholar

Gilbert, F. The burden of normality: from ‘chronically ill’ to ‘symptom free’. New ethical challenges for deep brain stimulation postoperative treatment. J. Med. Ethics 2012; 38: 408–12.Google Scholar

Wilson, S., Bladin, P., Saling, M. The ‘burden of normality’: concepts of adjustment after surgery for seizures. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2001; 70: 649–56.Google Scholar

Komesaroff, P. A. Experiments in Love and Death. Seattle, University of Washington Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Manson, N. C., O’Neill, O. Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics. Cambridge, University of Cambridge Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Lipsman, N., Bernstein, M., Lozano, M. Criteria for the ethical conduct of psychiatric neurosurgery clinical trials. Neurosurg. Focus 2010; 29: E9.Google Scholar

Morse, S. J. New therapies, old problems, or, a plea for neuromodesty. AJOB Neuroscience 2012; 3: 60–4.Google Scholar

Laura, Y., Cabrera, H. M. K., Boyce, R. M., et al. Conflicts of interest and industry professional relationships in psychiatric neurosurgery: a comparative literature review. Neurosurg. Focus 2108; 45: E20.Google Scholar

Komesaroff, P. A., Lipworth, W., Kerridge, I. Conflicts of interest: new thinking, new processes. Int. Med. J. 2109; 49(5): 574–7.Google Scholar

Fins, J. J., Schlaepfer, T. E., Nuttin, B., et al. Ethical guidance for the management of conflicts of interest for researchers, engineers and clinicians engaged in the development of therapeutic deep brain stimulation. J. Neural. Eng. 2011; 8: 033001.Google Scholar

Parsons, T. The Social System. Glencoe, IL, Free Press, 1951.Google Scholar

Illich, I. Medical Nemesis. London, Random House, 1976.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. London, Random House, 1988.Google Scholar

Szasz, T. S. The myth of mental illness. American Psychologist 1960; 15: 113–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lipsman, N., Zener, R., Bernstein, M. Personal identity, enhancement and neurosurgery: a qualitative study in applied neuroethics. Bioethics 2009; 23: 375–83.Google Scholar

Synofzik, M., Schlaepfer, T. E. Stimulating personality: ethical criteria for deep brain stimulation in psychiatric patients and for enhancement purposes. Biotechnol. J. 2008; 3: 1511–20.Google Scholar

Lipsman, N., Bernstein, M., Lozano, M. Criteria for the ethical conduct of psychiatric neurosurgery clinical trials. Neurosurg. Focus 2010; 29: E9.Google Scholar

Rabins, P., Brian, S., Appleby, J. B., et al. Scientific and ethical issues related to deep brain stimulation for disorders of mood, behavior and thought. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2009; 66: 931–7.Google Scholar

Lipsman, N., Bernstein, M., Lozano, M. Criteria for the ethical conduct of psychiatric neurosurgery clinical trials. Neurosurg. Focus 2010; 29: E9.Google Scholar

Fins, J. From psychosurgery to neuromodulation and palliation: history’s lessons for the ethical conduct and regulation of neuropsychiatric research. Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am. 2003; 14: 303–19.Google Scholar

Bell, E., Racine, E. Ethics guidance for neurological and psychiatric deep brain stimulation. Handbook of Clinical Neurology: Brain Stimulation, Vol. 116, 3rd series, ed. A. M. Lozano, M. Hallett. London, Elsevier, 2013, 313–25.Google Scholar

Synofzika, M., Schlaepferb, T. E. Electrodes in the brain: ethical criteria for research and treatment with deep brain stimulation for neuropsychiatric disorders. Brain Stimul. 2011; 4: 7–16.Google Scholar

A definition of irreversible coma. Report of the ad hoc committee of the Harvard Medical School to examine the definition of brain death. JAMA 1968; 205: 337–40.Google Scholar

Diagnosis of brain death. Statement issued by the honorary secretary of the Conference of Medical Royal Colleges and their faculties in the United Kingdom on 11 October 1976. BMJ 1976; 2: 1187–8.Google Scholar

AMA Judicial Council. Ethical guidelines for organ transplantation. JAMA 1968; 205: 341–2.Google Scholar

National Health & Medical Research Foundation. Ethical guidelines for the care of people in post-coma unresponsiveness (vegetative state) or a minimally responsive state. Australian Government Publication, 2008. Available at: www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/ethical-guidelines-care-people-post-coma-unresponsiveness.Google Scholar

Truog, R. D., Miller, F. G. Brain death: justifications and critiques. Clin. Ethics 2012; 7: 128–32Google Scholar

Controversies in the determination of death: a white paper of the President’s Council on Bioethics. 2008. Available at: http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/pcbe/reports/death/index.html.Google Scholar

Miller, F. G., Truog, R. D., Brock, D. W. The DDR: Can it withstand critical scrutiny? J. Med. Philos. 2010; 35: 299–312.Google Scholar

Truog, R. D. Lessons from the case of Jahi McMath. Defining death; organ transplantation and the fifty-year legacy of the Harvard Report on Brain Death, special report. Hastings Cent. Rep. 2018; 48: S70–3.Google Scholar

Australian Government, National Health and Medical Research Foundation. Organ and tissue donation after death, for transplantation. Guidelines for ethical practice for health professionals. 2007. Available at: www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/e75.pdf.Google Scholar

Abouma, G. M. Recent Pronouncements by Two Major Religions on Organ Transplantation: Current status of Clinical Organ Transplantation. The Hague, Nijhoff, 1984, xi–xii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dodek, P. Mandatory reporting of ‘imminent’ death to identify organ donors: history, controversy, and potential solutions. Can. J. Anesth. 2003; 50: 955–60.Google Scholar

Australian Government, Department of Health. Supporting Living Organ Donors Program. 2018. Available at: www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/Leave-for-living-organ-donors.Google Scholar

Brown, S. J. Autonomy, trust and ante-mortem interventions to facilitate organ donation. Clin. Ethics 2018; 13: 143–50.Google Scholar

Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society. The ANZICS Statement on Death and Organ Donation (Edition 3.2). Melbourne, ANZICS, 2013. Available at: https://csds.qld.edu.au/sdc/Provectus/ELI/Module%202%20-%20Organ%20donation%20after%20brain%20death/files/ANZICS%20Statement%20on%20%20Death%20and%20Organ%20Donation%20Edition%203.2%20(3).pdf.Google Scholar

Morrissey, P. E. The case for kidney donation before end-of-life care. Am. J. Bioeth. 2012; 12: 1–8.Google Scholar