Book contents
- Rulers and Ruled in Ancient Greece, Rome, and China
- Rulers and Ruled in Ancient Greece, Rome, and China
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Maps
- Contributors
- Preface
- Chronology of the Ancient Mediterranean
- Chronology of Ancient China
- Maps of Ancient China, Greece, and Rome
- The Many Faces of “the People” in the Ancient World
- Part I Authority and Lifestyles of Distinction
- Part II The People as Agents and Addressees
- Part III Inversions of the People: Emperors and Tyrants
- Part IV Identities and “Others”
- Glossary
- Index
- References
Part III - Inversions of the People: Emperors and Tyrants
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 January 2021
Book contents
- Rulers and Ruled in Ancient Greece, Rome, and China
- Rulers and Ruled in Ancient Greece, Rome, and China
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Maps
- Contributors
- Preface
- Chronology of the Ancient Mediterranean
- Chronology of Ancient China
- Maps of Ancient China, Greece, and Rome
- The Many Faces of “the People” in the Ancient World
- Part I Authority and Lifestyles of Distinction
- Part II The People as Agents and Addressees
- Part III Inversions of the People: Emperors and Tyrants
- Part IV Identities and “Others”
- Glossary
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Rulers and Ruled in Ancient Greece, Rome, and China , pp. 267 - 396Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Bibliography
Brunt, Peter Astbury, and More, John Michael. 1967. Res Gestae Divi Augusti: The Achievements of the Divine Augustus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cooley, Alison E. 2009. Res Gestae Divi Augusti: Text, Translation, and Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cotton, Hannah M., and Yakobson, Alexander. 2002. ‘Arcanum Imperii: The Powers of Augustus.’ In Clark, Gillian and Rajak, Tessa, eds., Philosophy and Power in the Graeco-Roman World, Essays in Honour of Miriam Griffin, 193–209. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crook, John A. 1996. ‘The Political History, 30 bc to ad 14.’ In Bowman, Alan K., Champlin, Edward, and Lintott, Andrew, eds., The Cambridge Ancient History, Volume 10: The Augustan Empire, 43 bc–ad 69, 2nd ed., 70–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dubs, Homer H. 1938–1955. The History of the Former Han Dynasty. 3 vols. Baltimore, MD: Waverley Press.Google Scholar
Eder, Walter. 2005. ‘Augustus and the Power of Tradition.’ In Galinsky, Karl, ed., The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus, 13–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eder, Walter. 1990. ‘Augustus and the Power of Tradition: The Augustan Principate as Binding Link between Republic and Empire.’ In Raaflaub, Kurt A. and Toher, Mark, eds. Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and His Principate, 71–122. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ferrary, Jean-Louis. 2001. ‘À propos des pouvoirs d’Auguste.’ Cahiers du Centre Gustave-Glotz 12: 103–125.Google Scholar
Freudengurg, Kirk. 2014. ‘Recusatio as Political Theatre: Horace’s Letter to Augustus.’ Journal of Roman Studies 104: 105–113.Google Scholar
Goodman, Howard L. 1998. Tsa’o P’i Transcendent: The Political Culture of Dynasty-Founding in China and the End of Han. Seattle: Washington University Press.Google Scholar
Hanshu 漢書. 1962. Comp. Ban, Gu 班固 (32–92 ce). 100 juan (12 vols.). Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
Huttner, Ulrich. 2004. Recusatio Imperii: Ein politisches Ritual zwischen Ethik und Taktik. Zurich: Olms.Google Scholar
Lacey, W. K. 1996 .Augustus and the Principate: The Evolution of the System. Leeds, UK: Francis Cairns.Google Scholar
Lacey, W. K. 1979. ‘Summi fastigii vocabulum: “The Story of a Title”.’ Journal of Roman Studies 69: 28–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leys, Simon, trans. 2014. The Analects: The Simon Leys Translation, Interpretations. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Liji zhuzi suoyin 禮記逐字索引. 1993. ICS Ancient Chinese Texts Series. Hong Kong: Shangwu.Google Scholar
Millar, Fergus. 2002. ‘Triumvirate and Principate.’ In Cotton, Hannah M. and Rogers, Guy M., eds., The Roman Republic and the Augustan Revolution, 241–270. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Pines, Yuri. 2012. The Everlasting Empire: The Political Culture of Ancient China and Its Imperial Legacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
the Elder, Pliny. Natural History. 1938. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ramage, Edwin S. 1987. The Nature and Purpose of Augustus’ Res Gestae. Stuttgart: Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Rich, John W. 2007. Cassius Dio: The Augustan Settlement (Roman History 53–55/9). Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Rich, John W., and Williams, John H. C.. 1999. ‘Leges et Iura P. R. Restituit: A new Aureus of Octavian and the Settlement of 28–27 bc.’ Numismatic Chronicle 159: 169–213.Google Scholar
Richardson, John S. 2012. Augustan Rome 44 bc to ad 14: The Restoration of the Republic and the Establishment of the Empire. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Ridley, Ronald. 2003. The Emperor’s Retrospect: Augustus’ Res Gestae in Epigraphy Historiography and Commentary. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Scheid, John. 2007. Res Gestae Divi Augusti: Hauts Faits du Divin Auguste. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Shiji 史記. 1959. Comp. Sima, Qian 司馬遷 (145?–86? bce) et al. 130 juan (12 vols.) Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew. 1982. ‘Civilis Princeps: Between Citizen and King.’ Journal of Roman Studies 72: 32–48.Google Scholar
Watson, Burton, trans. 1993. Records of the Grand Historian: Han Dynasty I. New York: Columbia University Press. Translation of Shiji.Google Scholar
Yakobson, Alexander. 2011. ‘Political Stability and Public Order: Athens vs. Rome.’ In Herman, Gabriel, ed., Stability and Crisis in the Athenian Democracy, 139–156. Stuttgart: Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Zanker, Paul. 1990. The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Ash, Rhiannon. 2016. “Never Say Die! Assassinating Emperors in Suetonius’ Lives of the Caesars.” In De Temmerman, Koen and Demoen, Kristoffel, eds., Writing Biography in Greece and Rome. Narrative Technique and Fictionalization, 200–216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Ted. 2001. “Humor.” In Gaut, Berys and Lopes, Dominic McIver, eds., The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics, 375–381. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977. “Nietzsche, Genealogy, History.” In Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, 139–164. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen. 2010. Shakespeare’s Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hanshu 漢書. 1962. Compiled by Ban, Gu 班固 (32–92 ce). 100 juan (12 vols.). Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
Harbsmeier, Christopher. 1990. “Confucius Ridens: Humor in The Analects.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 50, no. 1: 131–161.Google Scholar
Huainanzi 淮南子. See He 1998.Google Scholar
Huang, Hui 黃暉. 1990. Lunheng jiaoshi 論衡校釋. With collected commentaries by Liu, Pansui 劉盼遂. 3 vols. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
Huang, Shulin 黃叔琳, and Li, Xiang 李詳, ann., Yang, Mingzhao 楊明照, coll. 2005. Zengding Wenxin diaolong jiaozhu 增訂文心彫龍校注. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
Hurley, Donna. 2014. “Rhetorics of Assassination: Ironic Reversal and the Emperor Gaius.” In Power, Tristan, and Gibson, Roy K., eds., Suetonius the Biographer: Studies in Roman Lives, 146–158. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hutton, Eric L., trans. 2014. Xunzi: The Complete Text. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Klossowski, Pierre. 2007. “Nietzsche, Polytheism, and Parody.” In Such a Deathly Desire, 99–122. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Knechtges, David. 1980. “Wit, Humor, and Satire in Early Chinese Literature (to ad 220).” Monumenta Serica 29: 79–98.Google Scholar
Liji jijie 禮記集解. 1989. Compiled by Sun, Xidan 孫希旦 (1736–1784 ce). Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
Li, Wai-yee. 2013.“Riddles, Concealment, and Rhetoric in Early China.” In Olberding, Garret, ed., Facing the Monarch: Modes of Advice in the Early Chinese Court, 100–132. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Asia Center Publications.Google Scholar
Li, Wai-yee. 2007. The Readability of the Past in Early Chinese Historiography. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center.Google Scholar
Lu, Qianwen. 2013. “Mo Yan’s Our Jingke: Downfall by Design.” People’s Daily Online, February 20. http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90782/8136487.htmlGoogle Scholar
Lunheng 論衡. 1990. Compiled by Wang, Chong 王充 (27–100 ce). 30 juan. See Huang Hui 1990.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò (1469–1527). 1998. The Prince. Mansfield, Harvey C., trans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Major, John, Queen, Sarah A., Meyer, Andrew Seth, and Roth, Harold D., trans. and eds. 2010. The Huainanzi: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Government in Early Han China. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Maoshi zhengyi 毛詩正義. 1999. In Shisanjing zhushu 十三經注疏. Annotated by Ruan, Yuan 阮元 (1764–1849 ce). 245 juan. Beijing: Beijing daxue chubanshe.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1967. Will to Power. Translated by Kaufmann, Walter and Hollingdale, R. J.. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Olberding, Garret. 2012. Dubious Facts: The Evidence of Early Chinese Historiography. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Pines, Yuri. 2009. “Confucian Irony? ‘King Wu’s Enthronement’ Reconsidered.” In Findeisen, Raoul David, Isay, Gad C., Katz-Goehr, Amira, Pines, Yuri, and Yariv-Laor, Lihi, eds., At Home in Many Worlds: Reading, Writing, and Translating from Chinese and Jewish Cultures: Essays in Honour of Irene Eber, 55–68. Wiesbaden: Harrasowitz.Google Scholar
Pines, Yuri. 2008. “A Hero Terrorist: Adoration of Jing Ke Revisited.” Asia Major 21, no. 2: 1–34.Google Scholar
Plutarch, . 1988. Life of Antony. Edited by Pelling, C. B. R.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Power, Tristan. 2014. “The Endings of Suetonius’ Caesars.” In Power, Tristan and Gibson, Roy K., eds., Suetonius: the Biographer: Studies in Roman Lives, 58–80. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Queen, Sarah. 2013. “The Rhetoric of Dong Zhongshu’s Imperial Communications.” In Olberding, Garret, ed., Facing the Monarch: Modes of Advice in the Early Chinese Court, 189–196. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Asia Center Publications.Google Scholar
Sanders, Barry. 1995. Sudden Glory: Laughter as Subversive History. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Schaberg, David. 2005. “Playing at Critique: Indirect Remonstrance and the Formation of Shi Identity.” In Kern, Martin, ed. Text and Ritual in Early China, 193–225. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shiji 史記. 1959. Compiled by Sima, Qian 司馬遷 (145?–86? bce) et al. 130 juan (12 vols.) Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
Shijing 詩經. See Maoshi zhengyi 1999.Google Scholar
Sullivan, J. P. 1985. Literature and Politics in the Age of Nero. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Swartz, Wendy. 2008. Reading Tao Yuanming: Shifting Paradigms of Historical Reception (427–1900). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center.Google Scholar
Tacitus, . 1937. The Annals. Books IV–VI, XI–XII. Translated by John Jackson. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Twiss, Sumner B., and Chan, Jonathan. 2012. “The Classical Confucian Position on the Legitimate Use of Military Force.” Journal of Religious Ethics 40, no. 3: 447–472.Google Scholar
Van Auken, Newell Ann. 2014. “Killings and Assassinations in the Spring and Autumn as Records of Judgments.” Asia Major 27, no. 1: 1–31.Google Scholar
Van Auken, Newell Ann. 2011. “Who is a rén 人? The Use of rén in Spring and Autumn Records and Its Interpretation in the Zuŏ, Gōngyáng, and Gŭliáng Commentaries,” Journal of the American Oriental Society 131, no. 4: 555–590.Google Scholar
Van Ess, Hans. 2014. “Emperor Wu of the Han and the First August Emperor of Qin in Sima Qian’s Shiji.” In Pines, Yuri, von Falkenhausen, Lothar, Shelach, Gideon, and Yates, Robin D. S., eds., Birth of an Empire: The State of Qin Revisited, 239–257. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Van Rooy, C. A. 1965. Studies in Classical Satire and Related Literary Theory. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wagner, Donald B. 2008. Science and Civilisation in China, Vol. 5: Chemistry and Chemical Technology, Part 11, Ferrous Metallurgy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, Burton, trans. 1993a Records of the Grand Historian: Qin Dynasty. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, Burton, 1993b Records of the Grand Historian: Han Dynasty I. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Woolf, Greg. 2006. Et Tu, Brute? The Murder of Caesar and Political Assassination. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Wu, Yenna. 1998. “In Search of Satire in Classical Chinese Poetry and Prose.” Tamkang Review 28, no. 4: 1–39.Google Scholar
Xunzi 荀子. See Wang 1997.Google Scholar
Yinque shan Han mu zhujian 銀雀山漢墓竹簡Vol. 1. 1985. Edited by Yinque shan Han mu zhujian zhengli xiaozu 銀雀山漢墓竹簡整理小組. Beijing: Wenwu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Zuozhuan 左傳. See Yang 1981.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Alföldy, Géza. 1981. ‘Die Stellung der Ritter in der Führungsschicht des Imperium Romanum.’ Chiron 11: 69–215.Google Scholar
Auyang, Sunny Y. 2014. The Dragon and the Eagle: The Rise and Fall of the Chinese and Roman Empires. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Baldry, Harold Caparne. 1965. The Unity of Mankind in Greek Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barbieri-Low, Anthony J. 2007. Artisans in Early Imperial China. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Béranger, Jean. 1973. Principatus: Études de notions et d’histoire politiques dans l’antiquité greco-romaine. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Bielenstein, Hans. 1980. The Bureaucracy of Han Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Binder, Gerhard. 1993. ‘“Augusteische Erneuerung”: Kritische Anmerkungen zu einem Schlagwortder Klassischen Altertumswissenschaften im 20. Jahrhundert.’ In Neumeister, Christoff, ed., Antike Texte in Forschung und Schule : Festschrift für Willibald Heilmann zum 65. Geburtstag, 279–299. Frankfurt am Main: Diesterweg.Google Scholar
Bleicken, Jochen. 1991. Prinzipat und Republik: Überlegungen zum Charakter des römischen Kaisertums. Stuttgart: F. Steiner.Google Scholar
Blösel, Wolfgang. 1998. ‘Die Anakyklosis: Theorie und die Verfassung Roms im Spiegel des sechsten Buches des Polybios und Ciceros De re publica, Buch II.’ Hermes 126: 31–57.Google Scholar
Bonnaud, Robert. 2007. Victoires sur le temps: Essais comparatistes: Polybe le Grec et Sima Qian le Chinois. Condeixa-a-Nova, Portugal: La Ligne d'Ombre.Google Scholar
Borzsák, Stefan. 1975. ‘Cicero und Caesar: Ihre Beziehungen im Spiegel des Romulus-Mythos.’ In Michel, Alain and Verdière, Raoul, eds., Ciceronia: Hommages à Kazimierz Kumaniecki, 22–35. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Brandauer, Frederick Paul, and Huang, Chun-Chieh, eds. 1994. Imperial Rulership and Cultural Change in Traditional China. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Breuer, Stefan. 2014. Der charismatische Staat: Ursprünge und Frühformen staatlicher Herrschaft. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Bringmann, Klaus. 2003. Krise und Ende der römischen Republik (133–42 v. Chr.). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Brodersen, Kai, ed. 2000. Virtuelle Antike: Wendepunkte der Alten Geschichte. Darmstadt: Primus.Google Scholar
Bruhns, Hinnerk, David, Jean-Michel, and Nippel, Wilfried, eds. 1997. Die späte römische Republik: La fin de la République romaine: Un débat franco-allemand d’histoire et d’historiographie. Rome: École française de Rome.Google Scholar
Cai, Liang. 2014. Witchcraft and the Rise of the First Confucian Empire. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Castritius, Helmut. 1982. Der römische Prinzipat als Republik. Husum: Matthiesen Verlag.Google Scholar
Chan, Lois Mai. 1972. ‘The Burning of the Books in China, 213 bc.’ Journal of Library History 7, no. 12: 101–108.Google Scholar
Chavannes, Edouard. 1895–1904. Les mémoires historiques de Se-ma-Ts’ien. Paris: A. Maisonneuve.Google Scholar
Ching, Julia, and Guisso, Richard W. L., eds. 1991. Sages and Filial Sons: Mythology and Archaeology in Ancient China. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Christ, Karl. 2000. Krise und Untergang der römischen Republik. 4th ed. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Cornforth, Maurice. 1977. The Open Philosophy and the Open Society: A Reply to Dr. Karl Popper's Refutations of Marxism. 2nd ed. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Cramer, Frederick H. 1945. ‘Bookburning and Censorship in Ancient Rome’. Journal of the History of Ideas 6(2), 157–196.Google Scholar
Dauge, Yves Albert. 1982. Le Barbare: Recherches sur la conception romaine de la barbarie et de la civilisation. Brussels: Latomus.Google Scholar
David, Jean-Michel. 2000. La République romaine: De la deuxième guerre punique à la bataille d’Actium. 218–31. Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
Davis, Albert Richard. 1983. T'ao Yuan-ming (ad 365–427): His Works and Their Meanings. 2 vols. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
De Laet, Sigfried J. 1941. ‘La composition de l'ordre équestre sous Auguste et Tibère.’ Revue belge de philologie et d'histoire 20, no. 3: 509–531.Google Scholar
Demandt, Alexander. 2005. Ungeschehene Geschichte, Ein Traktat über die Frage: Was wäre geschehen, wenn …? 4th ed. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Demandt, Alexander. ed. 1997. Das Ende der Weltreiche: Von den Persern bis zur Sowjetunion. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Demougin, Ségolène, ed. 1999. L’ordre équestre: Histoire d’une aristocratie (IIe siècle av. J.-C.–IIIe siècle ap. J.-C.). Rome: École Française de Rome.Google Scholar
Dettenhofer, Maria H. 2006. ‘Das Römische Imperium und das China der Han-Zeit: Ansätze zu einer historischen Komparatistik.’ Latomus 65: 879–897.Google Scholar
Dettenhofer, Maria H. 2000. Herrschaft und Widerstand im augusteischen Principat: Die Konkurrenz zwischen res publica und domus Augusta. Stuttgart: F. Steiner.Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, Richard. 2006. ‘Who were the equites?’ In Deroux, Carl, ed., Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History, Vol. 13, 183–223. Brussels: Latomus.Google Scholar
Dunsch, Boris. 2015. ‘Historia magistra vitae? Zu einer Debatte zwischen Nepos und Cicero.’ In Dunsch, Boris and Prokoph, Felix M., eds., Geschichte und Gegenwart: Beiträge zu Cornelius Nepos, 33–83. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Ebrey, Patricia. 1978. Aristocratic Families of Early Imperial China: A Case Study of the Po-ling Ts’ui Family. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eder, Walter. 1990. ‘Augustus and the Power of Tradition: The Augustan Principate as Binding Link between Republic and Empire.’ In Raaflaub, Kurt A. and Toher, Mark, eds., Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and His Principate, 71–122. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Engels, David. Forthcoming a. ‘The Peach Blossom Land and the Sacred Isles: Utopias and Ideal States in Classical Antiquity and Ancient China – A Comparison’. In Destrée, Pierre, Opsomer, Jan, and Roskam, Geert, eds. Ancient Utopias. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Engels, David. Forthcoming b. ‘“Reinheit” als Konzept in der römischen Religion?’ In Zimmermann, Klaus et al., eds., Reinheit und Autorität.Google Scholar
Engels, David. Forthcoming c. ‘Historiographical Prefaces between Individual Programme and Literary Genre: The Prooemium to Polybius’ Histories.’ In Lehmann, Yves, ed., Mélanges Chassignet.Google Scholar
Engels, David. 2018a. ‘Spengler im 21. Jahrhundert: Überlegungen und Perspektiven zu einer Überarbeit der Spengler'schen Kulturmorphologie.’ In Fink, Sebastian and Rollinger, Robert, eds., Spengler im 21. Jahrhundert: Überlegungen und Perspektiven zu einer Überarbeit der Spengler'schen Kulturmorphologie, 451–486. Berlin: Springer VS.Google Scholar
Engels, David. 2018b. ‘Kulturmorphologie und Willensfreiheit: Überlegungen zu einer neuen komparatistischen Geschichtsphilosophie.’ In Engels, David, Otte, Max, and Thöndl, Michael, eds., Oswald Spenglers Untergang des Abendlandes: Die ersten hundert Jahre, 79–101. Waltrop: Manuscriptum.Google Scholar
Engels, David. 2018c. ‘Rex ille regum, ductor Agamemnon ducum: La réception d'Agamemnon dans le discours politique de la République tardive et le Haut Empire.’ Revue des Études Latines 96: 87–108.Google Scholar
Engels, David. 2018d. ‘Zwischenstaatlichkeit und Herrscherideal in militärisch-politischen Sachbüchern: Ein komparatistischer Versuch über Sūn Zǐ, Kauṭilya, Aeneas Tacticus und Machiavelli.’ Electrum 25: 209–241.Google Scholar
Engels, David. 2017a. ‘Construction de normes et morphologie culturelle: Empire romain, chinois, sasanide et fatimide – une comparaison historique.’ In Itgenshorst, Tanja and LeDoze, Philippe, eds., La norme sous la République romaine et le Haut Empire: Élaboration, diffusion et contournements, 53–73. Bordeaux: Ausonius.Google Scholar
Engels, David. 2017b. Benefactors, Kings, Rulers: Studies on the Seleukid Empire between East and West. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Engels, David. 2015a. ‘Biologistische und zyklische Geschichtsphilosophie: Ein struktureller Annäherungsversuch.’ In Engels, David, ed., Von Platon bis Fukuyama: Biologistische und zyklische Konzepte in der Geschichtsphilosophie der Antike und des Abendlandes, 8–46. Brussels: Latomus.Google Scholar
Engels, David. 2015b. ‘Polis et res publica: Esquisse d'une histoire constitutionnelle comparée du monde gréco-romain.’ Latomus 74: 1–29.Google Scholar
Engels, David. 2014a. Auf dem Weg ins Imperium: Die Krise der Europäischen Union und der Untergang der römischen Republik. Historische Parallelen. Berlin: Europa Verlag.Google Scholar
Engels, David. 2014b. ‘“Je veux être calife à la place du calife?” Überlegungen zur Funktion der Titel “Großkönig” und “König der Könige” vom 3. zum 1. Jh. v.Chr.’ In Cojocaru, Victor, Coskun, Altay, and Dana, Mădălina, eds., Interconnectivity in the Mediterranean and Pontic World during the Hellenistic and the Roman Periods, 333–362. Cluj-Napoca, Romania: Mega Publishing House.Google Scholar
Engels, David. 2013. Le Déclin: La crise de l'Union européenne et la chute de la république romaine, analogies historiques. Paris: Le Toucan.Google Scholar
Engels, David. 2010a. ‘Entrückung, Epiphanie und Consecration: Überlegungen zur Apotheose des römischen Kaisers.’ In Groß, Dominik and Grande, Jasmin, eds., Objekt Leiche: Technisierung, Ökonomisierung und Inszenierung toter Körper, 79–133. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Engels, David. 2010b. ‘Prodigies and Religious Propaganda: Seleucus and Augustus.’ In Deroux, Carl, ed., Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History, Vol. 15, 153–177. Brussels: Latomus.Google Scholar
Engels, David. 2009. ‘Déterminisme historique et perceptions de déchéance sous la république tardive et le principat.’ Latomus 68: 859–894.Google Scholar
Engels, David. 2007. Das römische Vorzeichenwesen (753–27 v.Chr.: Quellen, Terminologie, Kommentar, historische Entwicklung. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Evans, Richard J. 2014. Veränderte Vergangenheiten: Über kontrafaktisches Erzählen in der Geschichte. Munich: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt.Google Scholar
Falkenhausen, Lothar, von. 2006. Chinese Society in the Age of Confucius. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, University of California.Google Scholar
Fu, Zhengyuan. 1996. China’s Legalists: The Earliest Totalitarians and Their Art of Ruling. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Gagé, Jean. 1955. Apollon romain: Essais sur le culte d'Apollon et le développement du ‘ritus Graecus’ à Rome, des origines à Auguste. Paris: De Boccard.Google Scholar
Gaziano, V. 1968–1969. ‘Cosmopolitismo e individualismo nella cultura ellenistica.’ Annali del Liceo classico G. Garibaldi di Palermo 5–6: 81–94.Google Scholar
Gehler, Michael, and Rollinger, Robert, eds. 2014. Imperien und Reiche in der Weltgeschichte: Epochenübergreifende und globalhistorische Vergleiche. 2 vols. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Girardet, Klaus M. 2007. Rom auf dem Weg von der Republik zum Prinzipat. Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar
Gizewski, Christian. 1994. ‘Römische und alte chinesische Geschichte im Vergleich.’ Klio 76: 271–302.Google Scholar
Goossens, Roger. 1943. ‘La campagne électorale d'Agamemnon (Euripide, Iphigénie à Aulis 373).’ Revue belge de philologie et d'histoire 22, no. 1–2: 192–197.Google Scholar
Graham, Angus Charles. 1989. Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China. Chicago: La Salle.Google Scholar
Griffin, Miriam T. 2003. ‘Clementia after Caesar: From Politics to Philosophy.’ In Cairns, Francis and Fantham, Elaine, eds., Caesar against Liberty?: Perspectives on his Autocracy, 157–182. Cambridge: Francis Cairns Publications.Google Scholar
Griffin, Miriam T. 1986. ‘Philosophy, Cato, and Roman Suicide.’ Greece and Rome 33: 64–77.Google Scholar
Guizzo, Francesco. 1974. Il prinzipato fra ‘res publica’ e potere assoluto. Naples: Facoltà giuridica dell’Università di Napoli.Google Scholar
Gullini, Giorgio. 1978. Il classicismo augusteo: Cultura di regime e ‘dissenso’. Turin: G. Giappichelli.Google Scholar
Hall, Edith M. 1989. Inventing the Barbarian: Greek Self-definition Through Tragedy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hardy, Grant, and Kinney, Anne Behnke. 2005. The Establishment of the Han Empire and Imperial China. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Havas, László. 2004. ‘Caesar als Romulus der Eroberer.’ In Heftner, Herbert and Tomaschitz, Kurt, eds., Ad fontes! Festschrift für Gerhard Dobesch zum 65. Geburtstag, 355–367. Vienna: Wiener Humanistischen Gesellschaft.Google Scholar
Heilmeyer, Wolfgang D., La Rocca, Eugenio, and Künzel, Ernst, eds. 1988. Kaiser Augustus und die verlorene Republik. Berlin: Staatliche Museen Preußischer Kulturbesitz.Google Scholar
Hendrischke, Barbara. 2007. The Scripture on Great Peace: The Taiping Jing and the Beginnings of Daoism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hendrischke, Barbara. 1992. ‘The Daoist Utopia of Great Peace.’ Oriens Extremus 35: 61–91.Google Scholar
Hennig, Dieter T. 1973. ‘Labienus und der erste Majestätsprozess de famosis libellis.’ Chiron 3: 245–254.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, Karl-Joachim, ed. 2009. Eine politische Kultur (in) der Krise?: Die ‘letzte Generation‘ der römischen Republik. Munich: De Gruyter Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
Hsing, I-tien. 1980. ‘Rome and China: The Role of the Armies in the Imperial Succession: A Comparative Study.’ PhD diss., University of Hawa’ii at Manoa.Google Scholar
Hsu, Cho-yun. 1965. Ancient China in Transition: An Analysis of Social Mobility, 722–222 bc. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Jehne, Martin, ed. 1996. Demokratie in Rom? Zur Rolle des Volkes in der Politik der römischen Republik. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Jehne, Martin, 1994. Koine Eirene: Untersuchungen zu den Befriedungs- und Stabilisierungsbemühungen in der griechische Poliswelt des 4. Jahrhunderts v. Chr. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Jüthner, Julius. 1923. Hellenen und Barbaren aus der Geschichte des Nationalbewusstseins. Leipzig: Dieterich.Google Scholar
Kern, Martin. 2000. The Stele Inscriptions of Ch’in Shih-huang: Text and Ritual in Early Chinese Imperial Representation. New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Kienast, Dietmar. 1996. Römische Kaisertabelle: Grundzüge einer römischen Kaiserchronologie. 2nd ed. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
King, Richard, and Schilling, Denis, eds. 2011. How Should One Live? Comparing Ethics in Ancient China and Greco-Roman Antiquity. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kühnen, Angela. 2008. Die imitatio Alexandri in der römischen Politik (1. Jh. v. Chr. bis 3. Jh. n. Chr.). Münster: Rhema.Google Scholar
Kunikata, Eiji. 2009. ‘The Origin of Cosmopolitanism.’ Journal of Classical Studies: The Journal of the Classical Society of Japan 57: 65–77.Google Scholar
Lagerwey, John, and Kalinowski, Marc, eds. 2009. Early Chinese Religion, Part One: Shang through Han (1250 bc–220 ad). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Lewis, Mark. 2007. The Early Chinese Empire: Qin and Han. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Mark. 2000. ‘The City-State in Spring-and-Autumn China.’ In Hansen, Mogens Herman, ed., A Comparative Study of Thirty City-State Cultures, 359–374. Copenhagen: C. A. Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
Li, Xueqin. 1985. Eastern Zhou and Qin Civilization. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Yu-ning. 1977. Shang Yang’s Reforms and State Control in China. White Plains, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Geoffrey. 2002. The Ambitions of Curiosity: Understanding the World in Ancient Greece and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Geoffrey, and Sivin, Nathan. 2002. The Way and the Word: Science and Medicine in Early China and Greece. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Loewe, Michael. 2006. The Government of the Qin and Han Empires, 221 bce–220 ce. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Loewe, Michael. 1994. Divination, Mythology and Monarchy in Han China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loewe, Michael. 1982. Faith, Myth and Reason in Han China. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Loewe, Michael, and Shaughnessy, E. L., eds. 1999. The Cambridge History of Ancient China: From the Origins of Civilization to 221 bc. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lu, Xing. 1998. Rhetoric in Ancient China, Fifth to Third Century bce: A Comparison with Classical Greek Rhetoric. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Thomas R. 2010. Herodotus and Sima Qian: The First Great Historians of Greece and China: A Brief History with Documents. Boston: Bedford/St. Martins.Google Scholar
McNeal, Robin. 2000. ‘Acquiring People: Social Organization, Mobilization, and Discourse on the Civil and the Martial in Ancient China.’ PhD diss., University of Washington.Google Scholar
Mehl, Andreas. 1992. ‘Erziehung zum Hellenen – Erziehung zum Weltbürger: Bemerkungen zum Gymnasion im hellenistischen Osten.’ Nikephoros 5: 43–73.Google Scholar
Meier, Christian. 1980. ‘Die Begründung der Monarchie als Wiederherstellung der Republik.’ In Die Ohnmacht des allmächtigen Dictators Caesar, 225–287. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Michel, Dorothea. 1967. Alexander als Vorbild für Pompeius, Caesar und Marcus Antonius: Archäologische Untersuchungen. Brussels: Latomus.Google Scholar
Moles, John. 1993. ‘Le cosmopolitisme cynique.’ In Goulet-Cazé, Marie-Odile and Goulet, Richard, eds., Le cynisme ancien et ses prolongements, 259–280. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Müller, Klaus. 1985. Götterattribute und ihre Anwendung auf Augustus: Eine Studie über die indirekte Erhöhung des ersten Princeps in der Dichtung seiner Zeit. Idstein: Schulz-Kirchner.Google Scholar
Mutschler, Fritz-Heiner. 2008. ‘Tacite (et Tite-Live) et Sima Qian.’ Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé 2: 123–155.Google Scholar
Mutschler, Fritz-Heiner. 2007. ‘Tacitus und Sima Qian: Persönliche Erfahrung und historiographische Perspekktive.’ Philologus 151 (2007): 127–152.Google Scholar
Mutschler, Fritz-Heiner. 2006. ‘Tacitus und Sima Qian: Eine Annäherung.’ Philologus 150 (2006): 115–135.Google Scholar
Mutschler, Fritz-Heiner. 2003. ‘Zu Sinnhorizont und Funktion griechischer, römischer und altchinesischer Geschichtsschreibung.’ In Hölkeskamp, Karl-Joachim, ed., Sinn (in) der Antike: Orientierungssysteme, Leitbilder und Wertkonzepte im Altertum, 33–54. Mainz: Von Zabern.Google Scholar
Mutschler, Fritz-Heiner. 1997. ‘Vergleichende Beobachtungen zur griechisch-römischen und altchinesischen Geschichtsschreibung.’ Saeculum 48: 213–253.Google Scholar
Mutschler, Fritz-Heiner, and Mittag, Achim, eds. 2009. Conceiving the Empire: China and Rome Compared. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neininger, Ulrich. 1983. ‘Burying the Scholars Alive: On the Origin of a Confucian Martyrs’ Legend.’ In Eberhard, Wolfrans, Gawlikowski, Krzysztof, and Seychab, Carl-Albrecht, eds., East Asian Civilizations: New Attempts at Understanding Traditions, Vol. 2, 121–136. Munich: Simon & Magiera.Google Scholar
Parenti, Michael. 2003. The Assassination of Julius Caesar: A People's History of Ancient Rome. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Petersen, Jens Østergȧrd. 1995. ‘Which Books Did the First Emperor of Ch’in Burn.’ Monumenta Serica 43: 1–52.Google Scholar
Picone, Giusto, ed. 2008. Clementia Caesaris: Modelli etici, parenesi e retorica dell'esilio. Palermo: Palumbo.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, Francisco. 1999. La Crisis de la Republica, 133–44 a.C. Madrid: Editorial Síntesis.Google Scholar
Pines, Yuri. 2009a. ‘Imagining the Empire? Concepts of ‘Primeval Unity’ in Pre-Imperial Historiographic Tradition’ In Mutschler, Fritz-Heiner and Mittag, Achim, eds., Conceiving the Empire: China and Rome Compared, 67–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pines, Yuri. 2009b. Envisioning Eternal Empire: Chinese Political Thought of the Warring States Era. Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press.Google Scholar
Pines, Yuri, Gideon Shelach and Lothar von Falkenhausen, eds. 2014. Birth of an Empire. The State of Qin Revisited. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Portal, Jane, ed. 2007. The First Emperor: China's Terracotta Army. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Potter, David. 1994. Prophets and Emperors: Human and Divine Authority from Augustus to Theodosius. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Poo, Mu-chou. 2005. Enemies of Civilization: Attitudes toward Foreigners in Ancient Mesopotamia, Egypt, and China. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Puett, Michael. 2002. To Become a God: Cosmology, Sacrifice, and Self-Divinization in Early China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1983. ‘The Chinese and Their Neighbors in Prehistoric and Early Historic Times.’ In Keightley, D. N., ed., The Origins of Chinese Civilization, 411–466. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rabel, Robert K. 1984. ‘Agamemnon's Empire in Thucydides.’ Classical Journal 80: 8–10.Google Scholar
Rintelen, Karl Ludwig. 1955. ‘Cicero und Caesar: Kritische Untersuchungen zur Geschichte ihrer wechselseitigen Beziehungen.’ PhD diss., University of Marburg.Google Scholar
Rochlitz, Sabine. 1993. Das Bild Caesars in Ciceros ‘Orationes Caesarianae’: Untersuchungen zur ‘clementia’ und ‘sapientia Caesaris’. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Rollinger, Robert, and Gehler, Michael, eds. 2014. Imperien und Reiche in der Weltgeschichte: Epochenübergreifende und globalhistorische Vergleiche. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Rouland, Norbert. 1981. Rome, démocratie impossible: Les acteurs du pouvoir dans la cité romaine. Paradou: Actes Sud.Google Scholar
Ryberg, Inez Gertrude Scott. 1966. ‘Clupeus virtutis.’ In Wallach, Luitpold, ed., The Classical Tradition: Literary and Historical Studies in Honor of H. Caplan, 232–238. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ryder, Timothy Thomas Bennett. 1965. Koine Eirene: General Peace and Local Independence in Ancient Greece. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sanft, Charles. 2014. Communication and Cooperation in Early Imperial China: Publicizing the Qin Dynasty. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Scheidel, Walter, ed. 2015. State Power in Ancient China and Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheidel, Walter, 2010. Rome and China: Comparative Perspectives on Ancient World Empires. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schiel, Juliane. 2010. ‘Was wäre gewesen, wenn …? Vom Nutzen der kontrafaktischen Geschichtsschreibung.’ Viator 41: 211–231.Google Scholar
Scholtze, Johann. 1939. ‘Der Charakter des Agamemnon von Homer bis Euripides.’ PhD diss., University of Vienna.Google Scholar
Schulz-Falkenthal, Heinz. 1979. ‘Ich bin ein Weltbürger: Zum Kosmopolitismus in der Antike.’ Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Martin-Luther-Univ. Halle-Wittenberg 28: 29–39.Google Scholar
Seston, William. 1954. ‘Le clipeus virtutis d'Arles et la composition des Res gestae divi Augusti.’ Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, 286–297.Google Scholar
Shryock, John Knight. 1966. The Origin and Development of the State Cult of Confucius. New York: Paragon.Google Scholar
Spengler, Oswald. 1923. Der Untergang des Abendlandes. Umrisse einer Morphologie der Weltgeschichte, Vol. 1: Vienna 1918, Vol. 2: Munich 1922. Rev. ed. in 1 vol. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Stove, David C. 1982. Popper and After: Four Modern Irrationalists. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Taeger, Fritz. 1957–1960. Charisma: Studien zur Geschichte des antiken Herrscherkultes. 2 vols. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, Robert F. 2005. ‘What Caesar Said: Rhetoric and History in Sallust’s Coniuratio Catilinae 51.’ In Welch, Kathryn and Hillard, Tom W., eds., Roman Crossings: Theory and Practice in the Roman Republic, 209–223. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Taplin, Oliver. 1990. ‘Agamemnon's Role in the Iliad.’ In Pelling, Christopher, ed., Characterization and Individuality in Greek Literature, 60–82. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Teggart, Frederick John. 1939. Rome and China: A Study of Correlations in Historical Events. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Toynbee, Arnold. 1934–1961. A Study of History, Vols. 1–10 (1934–1954), Vols. 11–12 (1959–1961). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tschiedel, Hans Jürgen. 1981. Caesars Anticato: Eine Untersuchung der Testimonien und Fragmente. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Denis, Twitchett, and Loewe, Michael, eds. 1986. The Cambridge History of China, Vol. 1: The Ch’in and Han Empires, 221 bc–ad 220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vandermeersch, Léon. 1965. La Formation du légisme: Recherche sur la constitution d'une philosophie politique caracteristique de la Chine ancienne. Paris: Ecole française d’Extreme-Orient.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew. 2008. Rome’s Cultural Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, Burton, trans. 1993. Record of the Grand Historian. 2nd rev. ed. (1st ed. 1961). Hong Kong: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Weippert, Otto. 1972. ‘Alexander-imitatio und römische Politik in republikanischer Zeit.’ PhD diss., University of Augsburg.Google Scholar
Welwei, Karl-Wilhelm. 2001. ‘Lucius Iunius Brutus: zur Ausgestaltung und politischen Wirkung einer Legende.’ Gymnasium 108: 123–135.Google Scholar
Wiseman, Timothy P. 1971. New Men in the Roman Senate, 139 bc–14 ad. New York: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
Wistrand, Erik. 1981. The Policy of Brutus the Tyrannicide. Gothenburg: Kungliga Vetenskaps-och Vitterhets-samhället.Google Scholar
Wlosok, Antonie, ed. 1978. Römischer Kaiserkult. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Ando, Clifford. 2000. Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bickerman, Elias J. 1968. Chronology of the Ancient World. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bielenstein, Hans. 1980. The Bureaucracy of Han Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bo, Shuren 薄樹人. 1982. ‘Taolun Sima Qian de tianwenxue sixiang’ 討論司馬遷的天文學思想. Shixueshi yanjiu 史學史研究, no. 3: 7–15.Google Scholar
Brindley, Erica Fox. 2012. Music, Cosmology, and the Politics of Harmony in Early China. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Chavannes, Édouard. 1967. Les mémoires historiques de Se-Ma Ts’ien. Vol. 3. Paris: Librairie d’Amérique et d’Orient Adrien Maisonneuve.Google Scholar
Chin, Tamara T. 2014. Savage Exchange: Han Imperialism, Chinese Literary Style, and the Economic Imagination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cullen, Christopher. 2010. ‘Numbers, Numeracy, and the Cosmos.’ In Nylan, Michael and Loewe, Michael, eds., China's Early Empires, 323–338. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cullen, Christopher. 1996. Astronomy and Mathematics in Ancient China: The Zhou Bi Suan Jing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cullen, Christopher. 1993. ‘Motivations for Scientific Change in Ancient China: Emperor Wu and the Grand Inception Astronomical Reforms of 104 bc.’ Journal for the History of Astronomy Journal for the History of Astronomy 24, no. 3: 185–203.Google Scholar
Feeney, Denis. 2007. Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Galinsky, Karl. 1996. Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hanshu 漢書. 1962. Compiled by Ban, Gu 班固 (32–92 ce). 100 juan (12 vols.). Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
He, Pingli 何平立. 2003. Xunshou yu fengshan: Fengshan zhenzhi de wenhua guiji 巡狩與封禪: 封禪的文化軌跡. Jinan: Qi Lu shu she.Google Scholar
Hervouet, Yves. 1966. ‘Le valeur relative des textes du chi ki et du han chou.’ In Melanges de Sinologie offerts à Monsieur Paul Demieville, 55–76. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Hoffman Lewis, Martha W. 1955. The Official Priests of Rome under the Julio-Claudians: A Study of the Nobility from 44 bc to 68 ad. Rome: American Academy in Rome.Google Scholar
Hwang, Ming-chorng. 1996. ‘Ming-tang: Cosmology, Political Order and Monuments in Early China.’ PhD diss., Harvard University.Google Scholar
Kalinowski, Marc. 2004. ‘Fonctionnalité calendaire dans les cosmogonies anciennes de la Chine.’ Études chinoises 23: 87–122.Google Scholar
Lewis, Mark Edward. 1999. ‘The feng and shan Sacrifices of Emperor Wu of the Han.’ In McDermott, Joseph P., ed., State and Court Ritual in China, 50–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loewe, Michael. 2006. The Government of the Qin and Han Empires: 221 bce–220 ce. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Loewe, Michael. 1974. Crisis and Conflict in Han China, 104 bc to ad 9. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Major, John S. 1993. Heaven and Earth in Early Han Thought: Chapters Three, Four and Five of the Huainanzi. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Major, John et al., trans. 2010. The Huainanzi: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Government in Early Han China. New York: Columbia.Google Scholar
Martzloff, Jean-Claude. 2009. Le calendrier chinois: Structure et calculs, 104 av. JC–1644: Indétermination céleste et réforme permanente: La construction chinoise officielle du temps quotidien discret à partir d'un temps mathématique caché, linéaire et continu. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Michels, Agnes. 1967. The Calendar of the Roman Republic. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Daniel Patrick. 2013. ‘Knowing Heaven: Astronomy, the Calendar, and the Sagecraft of Science in Early Imperial China.’ PhD diss., University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Needham, Joseph. 1954. Science and Civilization in China, Volume 3: Mathematics and the Sciences of the Heavens and the Earth. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Noreña, Carlos F. 2011. Imperial Ideals in the Roman West: Representation, Circulation, Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olberding, Garret P. S. 2012. Dubious Facts: The Evidence of Early Chinese Historiography. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Pak, Chae-u 朴宰雨. 1994. ‘Shiji’ ‘Hanshu’ bijiao yanjiu “史記” “漢書” 比較研究. Beijing: Zhongguo wenxue chubanshe.Google Scholar
Pankenier, David. 2013. Astrology and Cosmology in Early China: Conforming Earth to Heaven. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rüpke, Jörg. 2012. Religion in Republican Rome: Rationalization and Ritual Change. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Rüpke, Jörg. 2011. The Roman Calendar from Numa to Constantine: Time, History, and the Fasti. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rüpke, Jörg. 2008. Fasti sacerdotum: A Prosopography of Pagan, Jewish, and Christian Religious Officials in the City of Rome, 300 bc to ad 499. Translated by Richardson, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Salzman, Michele Renee. 1990. On Roman Time: The Codex-Calendar of 354 and the Rhythms of Urban Life in Late Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sanft, Charles. 2008–2009. ‘Edict of Monthly Ordinances for the Four Seasons in Fifty Articles from 5 ce: Introduction to the Wall Inscription discovered at Xuanquanzhi, with Annotated Translation.’ Early China 32: 125–208.Google Scholar
Shiji 史記. 1959. Compiled by Sima, Qian 司馬遷 (145?–86? bce) et al. 130 juan (12 vols.) Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
Sivin, Nathan. 2009. Granting the Seasons: The Chinese Astronomical Reform of 1280, With a Study of Its Many Dimensions and a Translation of Its Records. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Stern, Sacha. 2003. Time and Process in Ancient Judaism. Oxford: Littman Library of Jewish Civilization.Google Scholar
Tseng, Lillian Lan-ying. 2011. Picturing Heaven in Early China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Van Ess, Hans. 2015. ‘The Late Western Han Historian Chu Shaosun.’ In Nylan, Michael and Vankeerberghen, Griet, eds., Chang’an 26 bce: An Augustan Age in China, 477–504. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew. 2008. Rome’s Cultural Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yoshimura, Masayuki 吉村昌之. 2003. ‘Shutsudo kandoku shiryō ni mirareru rekiku no shūsei’ 出土簡牘資料にみられる曆譜の集成. In Itaru, Tomiya 富谷至, ed., Henkyō shutsudo mokkan no kenkyū 邊疆出土木簡の研究, 459–516. Kyoto: Hōyū shoten.Google Scholar
Zhang, Peiyu 張培瑜 and Zhang, Chunlong 張春龍. 2006. ‘Qin dai lifa he Zhuanxu li’ 秦代曆法和顓頊曆. In Hunansheng wenwu kaogu yanjiusuo 湖南省文物考古研究所, ed., Liye fajue baogao 里耶發掘報告, 735–747. Changsha: Yuelu.Google Scholar