Abi-Saab, Georges, ‘The Uses of Article 19’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abraham, Kenneth S., ‘Individual Action and Collective Responsibility: The Dilemma of Mass Tort Reform’ (1987) 73 Virginia Law Review 845–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ago, Roberto, ‘Le délit international’ (1939–II) 68 Collected Courses of the Hague Academy Lecture of International Law 415–554.Google Scholar

Akande, Dapo, ‘The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over Nationals of Non-State Parties: Legal Basis and Limits’ (2003) 1 Journal of International Criminal Justice 618–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akande, Dapo, and Tzanakopoulos, Antonios, ‘The Crime of Aggression in the ICC and State Responsibility’ (2017) 58 Harvard International Law Online Journal 33–36.Google Scholar

Akhavan, Payam, ‘Can International Criminal Justice Prevent Future Atrocities?’ (2001) 95 American Journal of International Law 7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akhavan, Payam, ‘The Rise, and Fall, and Rise, of International Criminal Justice’ (2013) 11 Journal of International Criminal Justice 527–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, James F., ‘The International Criminal Court and the Prevention of Atrocities: Predicting the Court’s Impact’ (2009) 54 Villanova Law Review 1–56.Google Scholar

Alland, Denis, ‘Countermeasures of General Interest’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law 1221–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allott, Philip, ‘State Responsibility and the Unmaking of International Law’ (1988) 29 Harvard International Law Journal 1–26.Google Scholar

Alston, Philip, ‘The Myopia of the Handmaidens: International Lawyers and Globalization’ (1997) 3 European Journal of International Law 435–448.Google Scholar

Amann, Diane Marie, ‘Group Mentality, Expressivism, and Genocide’ (2002) 2 International Criminal Law Review 93–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amann, Diane Marie, ‘Message as Medium in Sierra Leone’ (2001) 7 ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law 237–245.Google Scholar

Ambos, Kai, ‘Article 25: Individual Criminal Responsibility’, in Triffterer, Otto (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (2nd ed., Munich: C. H. Beck, 2008), pp. 743–770.Google Scholar

Ambos, Kai, ‘The ICC and Common Purpose – What Contribution Is Required under Article 25(3)(d)?’, in Stahn, Carsten (ed.), The Law and Practice of the International Criminal Court (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 592–607.Google Scholar

Andenaes, Johannes, ‘The General Preventive Effects of Punishment’ (1966) 114 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 949–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andenaes, Johs, ‘General Prevention – Illusion or Reality?’ (1952) 43 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 176–198.Google Scholar

Anderson, Elisabeth S., and Pildes, Richard H., ‘Expressive Theories of Law: A General Restatement’ (1999–2000) 148 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1503–1575.Google Scholar

Anderson, Kenneth, ‘The Ottawa Convention Banning Landmines, the Role of International Non-governmental Organizations and the Idea of International Civil Society’ (2000) 11 European Journal of International Law 91–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Annas, Georg J., Andrews, Lori B., and Isasi, Rosari M., ‘Protecting the Endangered Human: Toward an International Treaty Prohibiting Cloning and Inheritable Alterations’ (2002) 28 American Journal of Law & Medicine 151–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Anscombe, Gertrude Elisabeth Margareta, ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’ (1958) 33 Philosophy 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anzilotti, Dionisio, Corso di diritto internazionale (Rome: Atheneum, 1912).Google Scholar

Anzilotti, Dionisio, Cours de droit international (trans. Gidel, 1929, Paris: Panthéon-Assas/LGDJ, 1999).Google Scholar

Anzilotti, Dionisio, ‘La responsabilité internationale des États a raison des dommages soufferts par des étrangers’ (1906) 13 Revue generale de droit international public 5–29.Google Scholar

Anzilotti, Dionisio, Teoria generale della responsabilità dello stato nel diritto internazionale (Florence: F. Lumachi Libraio-editore, 1902).Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, ‘Eichmann in Jerusalem’, The New Yorker, 16 February 1963, p. 40.Google Scholar

Aust, Helmut Philipp, Complicity and the Law of State Responsibility (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aust, Helmut Philipp, ‘The Normative Environment for Peace – On the Contribution of the ILC’s Articles on State Responsibility’, in Nolte, Georg (ed.), Peace through International Law: The Role of the International Law Commission. A Colloquium at the Occasion of Its Sixtieth Anniversary (Dordrecht: Springer, 2009), pp. 13–46.Google Scholar

Austin, John, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined and the Uses of the Study of Jurisprudence (1st published 1832, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1954).Google Scholar

Avant, Deborah D., Finnemore, Martha, and Sell, Susan K., ‘Who Governs the Globe?’, in Avant, Deborah D., Finnemore, Martha and Sell, Susan K. (eds.), Who Governs the Globe? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bahar, Mohamed Elewa, ‘“Just Convict Everyone!” – Joint Perpetration: From Tadic to Stakic and Back’ (2006) 6 International Criminal Law Review 293–302.Google Scholar

Barboza, Julio, The Environment, Risk and Liability in International Law (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barker, John, ‘The Different Forms of Reparation: Compensation’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 599–611.Google Scholar

Barkun, Michael, ‘International Law from a Functional Perspective’ (1970) 1 Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 19–28.Google Scholar

Barstow Magraw, Daniel, ‘Transboundary Harm: The International Law Commission’s Study of “International Liability”’ (1986) 80 American Journal of International Law 305–330.Google Scholar

Bartholomeusz, Lance, ‘The Amicus Curiae before International Courts and Tribunals’ (2005) 5 Non-State Actors and International Law 209–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bassiouni, M. Cherif, and Blakesley, Christopher L., ‘The Need for an International Criminal Court in the New International World Order’ (1992–1993) 25 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 151–182.Google Scholar

Baxter, Richard R., ‘Reflections on Codification in Light of the International Law of State Responsibility for Injuries to Aliens’ (1964–1965) 16 Syracuse Law Review 745–761.Google Scholar

Beaucillon, Charlotte, Fernandez, Julian, and Raspail, Hélèn, ‘State Responsibility for Conduct of Private Military and Security Companies’, in Francioni, Francesco and Ronzitti, Natalino (eds.), War by Contract: Human Rights, Humanitarian Law, and Private Contractors (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 396–420.Google Scholar

Beccaria, Cesare, Of Crimes and Punishments (Dei delitti e delle pene) (trans. Edward D. Ingraham, Philadelphia: R. Bell, 1774).Google Scholar

Beck, Ulrich, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (trans. Mark Ritter, London: Sage Publishing, 1992).Google Scholar

Becker, Tal, Terrorism and the State: Rethinking the Rules of State Responsibility (Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2005).Google Scholar

Bederman, David, ‘Counterintuiting Countermeasures’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 817–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bedjaoui, Mohammed, ‘Responsibility of States: Fault and Strict Liability’, in Bernhardt, Rudolf (ed.), Encyclopedia of International Law, vol. IV (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1984), pp. 212–216.Google Scholar

Bennett, Paul, ‘Mutual Risk: P & I Insurance Clubs and Maritime Safety and Environmental Performance’ (2001) 25 Marine Policy 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bensouda, Fatou, ‘Reflections from the International Criminal Court Prosecutor’ (2012) 45 Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 505–511.Google Scholar

Bentham, Jeremy, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (London: The Athlone Press, 1789).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benton Heath, J., ‘Human Dignity at Trial: Hard Cases and Broad Concepts in International Criminal Law’ (2012) 44 George Washington International Law Review 317–366.Google Scholar

Benzing, Markus, ‘The Complementarity Regime of the International Criminal Court: International Criminal Justice between State Sovereignty and the Fight against Impunity’ (2003) 7 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 591–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, Peter, Invitation to Sociology: A Humanistic Perspective (Doubleday: Anchor Books, 1963).Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, ‘State and Individual Secondary Liability in Case of International Organizations’ Responsibility: The Challenge of Unfairness Unveiled’ (2017) 1 Rivista di filosofia del diritto 51–78.Google Scholar

Betlehem, Daniel, ‘The Secret Life of International Law’ (2012) 1 Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 23–36.Google Scholar

Bianchi, Andrea, ‘Choice and (the Awareness of) Its Consequences: The ICJ’s “Structural Bias” Strikes Again in the Marshall Islands Case’ (2017) 111 American Journal of International Law Unbound 81–87.Google Scholar

Bianchi, Andrea, ‘State Responsibility and Criminal Liability of Individuals’, in Cassese, Antonio (ed.), The Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 16–24.Google Scholar

Bigi, Giulia, ‘Joint Criminal Enterprise in the Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the Prosecution of Senior Political and Military Leaders: The Krajisnik Case’ (2010) 14 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 51–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bird, Annie, ‘Third State Responsibility for Human Rights Violations’ (2011) 21 European Journal of International Law 883–900.Google Scholar

Birkett, Norman, ‘International Legal Theories Evolved at Nuremberg’, in Mettraux, Guénaël (ed.), Perspectives on the Nuremberg Trial (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 299–307.Google Scholar

Birnie, Patricia W., and Boyle, Alan E., International Law & the Environment (2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Black, Donald, The Behavior of Law (1st ed. 1976, special ed. 2010, Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2010).Google Scholar

Bleeker, Arne, ‘Does the Polluter Pay? The Polluter-Pays Principle in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice’ (2009) 18 European Energy and Environmental Law Review 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blum, Gabriella, and Lockwood, Natalie J., ‘Earthquakes and Wars’, in May, Larry and Edenberg, Elisabeth (eds.), Jus Post Bellum and Transitional Justice (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 178–216.Google Scholar

Boas, Gideon, Bischoff, James L., and Reid, Natalie L., International Criminal Law Practitioner Library, Volume I: Forms of Responsibility in International Criminal Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Bodansky, Daniel, and Crook, John R., ‘Symposium: The ILC’s State Responsibility Articles. Introduction and Overview’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 773–791.Google Scholar

Bollecker-Stern, Brigitte, Le préjudice dans la théorie de la responsabilité internationale (Editions A. Paris: Pedone, 1973).Google Scholar

Bonafè, Beatrice I., The Relationship between State and Individual Responsibility for International Crimes (Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonafè, Beatrice I., ‘Reassessing Dual Responsibility for International Crimes’ (2016) 73 Seqüênica (Florianópolis) 19–36.Google Scholar

Boon, Kirsten E., ‘The Law of Responsibility: A Response to Fragmentation?’ (2012) 25 Global Business and Development Law Journal 395–407.Google Scholar

Boon, Kristen E., ‘Are Control Tests Fit for the Future: The Slippage Problem in Attribution Doctrines’ (2014) 15 Melbourne Journal of International Law 330–377.Google Scholar

Borchard, Edwin, ‘The “Minimum” Standard of the Treatment of Aliens’ (1939) 33 Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at Its Annual Meeting 51–63.Google Scholar

Borchard, Edwin, ‘International Law and International Organization’ (1947) 41 American Journal of International Law 106–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borchard, Edwin M., ‘Theoretical Aspects of the International Responsibility of States’ (1929) Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 223–250.Google Scholar

Bosco, David, ‘The International Criminal Court and Crime Prevention: Byproduct or Conscious Goal?’ (2010–2011) 19 Michigan State Journal of International Law 163–200.Google Scholar

Boyle, Alan, ‘Liability for Injurious Consequences of Acts Not Prohibited by International Law’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), Oxford Commentaries on International Law: The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 95–104.Google Scholar

Boyle, Alan, and Chinkin, Christine, The Making of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Boyle, Alan E., ‘State Responsibility and International Liability for Injurious Consequences of Acts Not Prohibited by International Law: A Necessary Distinction?’ (1990) 39 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyle, Alan E., ‘Globalising Environmental Liability: The Interplay of National and International Law’ (2005) 17 Journal of Environmental law 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brownlie, Ian, State Responsibility: Part I (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law (4th ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Brownlie, Ian, Principles of International Law (6th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Brownlie, Ian, ‘State Responsibility and the International Court of Justice’, in Fitzmaurice, Malgosia and Sarooshi, Dan (eds.), Issues of State Responsibility before International Judicial Institutions (Oxford and Portland, OR: Bloomsbury, 2004), pp. 11–18.Google Scholar

Brunnée, Jutta, ‘International Legal Accountability through the Lens of the Law of State Responsibility’ (2005) XXXVI Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 21–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burke-White, William, ‘Proactive Complementarity: The International Criminal Court and National Courts in the Rome System of International Justice’ (2008) 49 Harvard International Law Journal 53–108.Google Scholar

Canç, ado Trindade, Antônio Augusto, ‘Complementarity between State Responsibility and Individual Responsibility for Grave Violations of Human Rights: The Crime of State Revisited’, in Ragazzi, Maurizio (ed.), International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005), pp. 253–269.Google Scholar

Cane, Peter, Responsibility in Law and Morality (Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2002).Google Scholar

Caron, David D., ‘The Basis of Responsibility: Attribution and Other Trans-Substantive Rules’, in Lillich, Richard B. and Magraw, Daniel Barstow (eds.), The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal: Its Contribution to the Law of State Responsibility (New York: Transnational Publishers, 1998), pp. 109–184.Google Scholar

Caron, David D., ‘The ILC Articles on State Responsibility: The Paradoxical Relationship between Form and Authority’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 857–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassesse, Antonio, ‘On the Current Trends towards Criminal Prosecution and Punishment of Breaches of International Humanitarian Law’ (1998) 9 European Journal of International Law 2–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, International Criminal Law (2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, International Law (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Cesar, Sylvia, ‘Privatization of Water: Evaluating Its Performance in the Developing World’ (2019) 90 Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., ‘Universal International Law’ (1993) 87 American Journal of International Law 529–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., ‘Editorial Comments: International Criminal Court and the Role of Domestic Courts’ (2001) 95 American Journal of International Law 120–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve, ‘The WTO’s Problematic “Last Resort” Against Noncompliance’ (2002) 57 The Swiss Review of International Economic Relations 409–440.Google Scholar

Chayes, Abram, and Handler Chayes, Antonia, The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chideu Moghalu, Kingsley, ‘Image and Reality of War Crimes Justice: External Perceptions of the International Criminal Court for Rwanda’ (2002) 26 Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 21.Google Scholar

Chinen, Mark, ‘Complexity Theory and the Horizontal and Vertical Dimensions of State Responsibility’ (2014) 25 European Journal of International Law 703–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chinkin, Christine, ‘A Critique of the Public/Private Dimension’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 387–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chinkin, Christine, ‘The Continuing Occupation: Issues of Joint and Several Liability and Effective Control’, in Shiner, Phil and Williams, Andrew (eds.), The Iraq War and International Law (Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2008), pp. 161–183.Google Scholar

Christenson, Gordon A., ‘The Doctrine of Attribution in State Responsibility’, in Lillich, R. B. (ed.), International Law of State Responsibility for Injuries to Aliens (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1983), pp. 321–360.Google Scholar

Christenson, Gordon A., ‘Attributing Conduct to the State: Is Anything New?’ (1990) 84 ASIL Proceedings 51–59.Google Scholar

Churchill, Robin R., and Lowe, Alan Vaughan, The Law of the Sea (2nd ed., Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Clapham, Andrew, ‘The Question of Jurisdiction under International Criminal Law over Legal Persons: Lessons from the Rome Conference on an International Criminal Court’, in Kamminga, Menno and Zia-Zarifi, S. (eds.), Liability of Multinational Corporations Under International Law (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000), pp. 139–195.Google Scholar

Clapham, Andrew, Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Clapham, Andrew, ‘Extending International Criminal Law beyond the Individual to Corporations and Armed Opposition Groups’ (2008) 6 Journal of International Criminal Justice 899–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, Lisa, ‘Global Health Public-Private Partnerships: Better Protecting Against Disease but Creating a Gap in Responsibility under International Law’ (2009) XX Finnish Yearbook of International Law 349–372.Google Scholar

Clarkson, Christopher M. V., Understanding Criminal Law (4th ed., London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2005).Google Scholar

Coffee, Jr., John C., ‘“No Soul to Damn: No Body to Kick”: An Unscandalized Inquiry into the Problem of Corporal Punishment’ (1980–1981) 79 Michigan Law Review 386–459.Google Scholar

Colandrea, Valerio, ‘On the Power of the European Court of Human Rights to Order Specific Non-monetary Measures: Some Remarks in Light of Assanidze, Broniowski and Sejdovic Cases’ (2007) 7 Human Rights Law Review 396–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Condorelli, Luigi, ‘Les attentats du 11 septembre et leurs suites: où va le droit?’ (2001) 105 Revue Générale de Droit International Public 829–848.Google Scholar

Conetti, Giorgio, ‘State’s Crime and Individuals’ Crimes: What Relationship?’ in Politi, Mauro and Nesi, Giuseppe (eds.), The Rome Statute of the ICC: A Challenge to Impunity (Dartmouth, Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001), pp. 131–133.Google Scholar

Contreras-Garduño, Diana, ‘Defining Beneficiaries of Collective Reparations: The Experience of the IACtHR’ (2012) 4 Amsterdam Law Forum 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, Kate, ‘No Liability, No Protocol’, in Bail, Christoph, Falkner, Robert and Marquard, Helen (eds.), The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment & Development (London: Earthscan Publications, 2002), pp. 371–384.Google Scholar

Côté, Luc, ‘Independence and Impartiality’, in Reydams, Luc, Wouters, Jan and Ryngaert, Cedric (eds.), International Prosecutors (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 319–415.Google Scholar

Cottereau, Gilles, ‘Système juridique et notion de responsabilité’, in Société française pour le droit international (ed.), La responsabilité dans le système international: Colloque du mans (Paris: Pedone, 1991), pp. 3–90.Google Scholar

Crawford, James, ‘Responsibility to the International Community as a Whole’ (2001) 8 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 303–322.Google Scholar

Crawford, James, ‘The ILC’s Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts: A Retrospect’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 874–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crawford, James, ‘International Law as an Open System’, in Crawford, James (ed.), International Law as an Open System: Selected Essays (London: Cameron May, 2002), pp. 17–38.Google Scholar

Crawford, James, The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Crawford, James, ‘Responsibility of States and Non-State Actors’, Speech at the Biennial Conference of the Japanese Association of International Law, Tokyo, 14 May 2005.Google Scholar

Crawford, James, ‘International Crimes of States’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 405–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crawford, James, ‘Investment Arbitration and the ILC Articles on State Responsibility’ (2010) 25 ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal 127–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crawford, James, ‘The System of International Responsibility’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crawford, James, ‘Responsibility for Breaches of Commmunitarian Norms: An Appraisal of Article 48 of the ILC Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts’, in Fastenrath, Ulrich et al. (eds.), From Bilateralism to Community Interest: Essays in Honour of Bruno Simma (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 224–240.Google Scholar

Crawford, James, ‘The International Court of Justice and the Law of State Responsibility’, in Tams, Christian J. and Sloan, James (eds.), The Development of International Law by the International Court of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 71–86.Google Scholar

Crawford, James, State Responsibility: The General Part (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crawford, James, Grant, Thomas, and Messineo, Francesco, ‘Towards an International Law of Responsibility: Early Doctrine’, in Chazournes, Laurence Boisson de and Kohen, Marcelo (eds.), International Law and the Quest for Its Implementation: Liber Amicorum Vera Gowlland-Debbas (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010), pp. 377–402.Google Scholar

Crawford, James, and Olleson, Simon, ‘The Nature and Forms of International Responsibility’, in Evans, Malcolm D. (ed.), International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), pp. 451–477.Google Scholar

Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain, and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain, and Olleson, Simon, ‘Preface’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. v–vii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crawford, James, and Watkins, Jeremy, ‘International Responsibility’, in Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 283–298.Google Scholar

Creutz, Katja, Transnational Privatised Security: The Erik Castrén Institute Research Reports 19/2006 (Helsinki: The Erik Castrén Institute, 2006).Google Scholar

Creutz, Katja, ‘The Problem of Regulation and the Role of the International Criminal Court’, in Mandrup, Thomas (ed.), Privatisation of Security: The Concept, Its History and Its Contemporary Application (Copenhagen: Conference Proceedings, Royal Danish Defence College, 2012), pp. 63–81.Google Scholar

Creutz, Katja, ‘International Responsibility and Problematic Law-making’, in Liivoja, Rain and Petman, Jarna (eds.), International Law-making: Essays in Honour of Jan Klabbers (Oxon: Routledge, 2014), pp. 171–189.Google Scholar

Cronin-Furman, Kate, ‘Managing Expectations: International Criminal Trials and the Prospects for Deterrence of Mass Atrocities’ (2013) International Journal of Transitional Justice 434–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cryer, Robert, Prosecuting International Crimes: Selectivity and the International Criminal Law Regime (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cryer, Robert, ‘International Criminal Law vs State Sovereignty: Another Round?’ (2006) European Journal of International Law 979–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cupido, Marjolein, ‘Common Purpose Liability versus Joint Perpetration: A Practical View on the ICC’s Hierarchy of Liability Theories’ (2016) 29 Leiden Journal of International Law 897–915.Google Scholar

Cutler, Claire, Private Power and Global Authority: Transnational Merchant Law in the Global Political Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahan, Yossi, Lerner, Hanna, and Milman-Sivan, Fain, ‘Shared Responsibility and the International Labour Organization’ (2012–2013) 34 Michigan Journal of International Law 675–743.Google Scholar

Damaska, Mirjan, ‘What Is the Point of International Criminal Justice?’ (2008) 83 Chicago-Kent Law Review 329–365.Google Scholar

Darcy, Shane, Collective Responsibility and Accountability under International Law (Leiden: Brill, 2007).Google Scholar

D’Aspremont, Jean, ‘The Foundations of the International Legal Order’ (2007) XVIII Finnish Yearbook of International Law 219–255.Google Scholar

D’Aspremont, Jean, Nollkaemper, André, Plakokefalos, Ilias, and Ryngaert, Cedric, ‘Sharing Responsibility between Non-State Actors and States in International Law: Introduction’ (2015) 62 Netherlands International Law Review 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawidowicz, Martin, Third-Party Countermeasures in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Aréchaga, Jiménez, ‘International Law in the Past Third of a Century’ (1978) 159 Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law 1–343.Google Scholar

DeFrancia, Cristian, ‘Due Process in International Criminal Courts: Why Procedure Matters’ (2001) 87 Virginia Law Review 1381–1489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de La Fayette, Louise Angélique, ‘International Liability for Damage to the Environment’, in Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, Ong, David M. and Merkouris, Panos (eds.), Research Handbook on International Environmental Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, 2010), pp. 320–360.Google Scholar

de Sadeleer, Nicolas, ‘The Polluter-pays Principle in EU Law–Bold Case Law and Poor Harmonisation’, in Voigt, Christina, Backer, Inge Lorange, and Fauchald, Ole Kristian (eds.), Pro Natura: Festskrift til Hans Christian Bugge (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 2012), pp. 405–419.Google Scholar

Desierto, Diane A., ‘Rawlsian Fairness and International Arbitration’ (2015) 36 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 939–993.Google Scholar

de Than, Claire, and Shorts, Edwin, International Criminal Law and Human Rights (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2003).Google Scholar

de Vattel, Emmerich, The Law of Nations: Or, Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns (1st published in 1758, trans. Chitty, Joseph, Philadelphia: T. and J. W. Johnson, 1839).Google Scholar

DeWitt Dickinson, Edwin, ‘The Analogy between Natural Persons and International Persons in the Law of Nations’ (1917) 26 The Yale Law Journal 564–591.Google Scholar

Dixon, Martin, Textbook on International Law (7th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dominicé, Christian, ‘La question de la double responsabilité de l’Etat et de son agent’, in Yakpo, Emile and Boumedra, Tahar (eds.), Liber Amicorum Mohammed Bedjaoui (The Hague, London, Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1999), pp. 143–157.Google Scholar

Dominicé, Christian, ‘Attribution of Conduct to Multiple States and the Implication of A State in the Act of Another State’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 281–289.Google Scholar

Dror, Yehezkel, ‘Values and the Law’ (1957) 17 The Antioch Review 440–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drumbl, Mark, ‘Collective Violence and Individual Punishment: The Criminality of Mass Atrocity’ (2005) 99 Northwestern University Law Review 539–610.Google Scholar

Drumbl, Mark, Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drumbl, Mark, ‘Collective Responsibility and Postconflict Justice’, in Isaacs, Tracy and Vernon, Richard (eds.), Accountability for Collective Wrongdoing (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 23–60.Google Scholar

Dugard, John, ‘Diplomatic Protection’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 1051–1071.Google Scholar

Dunn, Frederick S., ‘International Law and Private Property Rights’ (1928) 28 Columbia Law Review 166–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunn, Frederick S., The Protection of Nationals: A Study in the Application of International Law (New York: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1932).Google Scholar

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, La responsabilité internationale des États pour les dommages d’origine technologique et industrielle (Paris: Éditions A. Pedone, 1976).Google Scholar

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, ‘International Law of State Responsibility: Revolution or Evolution?’ (1989) 11 Michigan Journal of International Law 105–128.Google Scholar

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, ‘Dionisio Anzilotti and the Law of International Responsibility of States’ (1992) 3 European Journal of International Law 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Droit International Public (5th ed., Paris: Dalloz, 2000).Google Scholar

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, ‘A General Stocktaking of the Connections between the Multilateral Dimension of Obligations and Codification of the Law of Responsibility’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law 1053–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, ‘International Criminal Responsibility of the Individual and International Responsibility of the State’, in Cassese, Antonio, Gaeta, Paolo and Jones, John R. W. D. (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary (Volume II) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 1085–1099.Google Scholar

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, ‘Some Reflections on Contemporary International Law and the Appeal to Universal Values: A Response to Martti Koskenniemi’ (2005) 16 European Journal of International Law 131–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, ‘The Deficiencies of the Law of State Responsibility Relating to Breaches of “Obligations Owed to the International Community as a Whole”: Suggestions for Avoiding the Obsolescence of Aggravated Responsibility’, in Cassesse, Antonio (ed.), Realizing Utopia: The Future of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 210–226.Google Scholar

Dutheil De La Rochere, Jaqueline, ‘La Convention sur l’internationalisation de l’espace’ (1967) 13 Annuaire francais de droit international 607–647.Google Scholar

Eagleton, Clyde, ‘The Responsibility of the State for the Protection of Foreign Officials’ (1925) 19 American Journal of International Law 293–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eagleton, Clyde, Responsibility of States in International Law (New York: The New York University Press, 1928).Google Scholar

Eagleton, Clyde, ‘Measure of Damages in International Law’ (1929–1930) 39 Yale Law Journal 52–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, Mark E., ‘The International Criminal Court and Its Implication for Domestic Law and National Capacity-Building’ (2002) 15 Florida Journal of International Law 215–242.Google Scholar

Erskine, Toni, ‘Kicking Bodies and Damning Souls: The Danger of Harming “Innocent” Individuals While Punishing “Delinquent” States’, in Isaacs, Tracy and Vernon, Richard (eds.), Accountability for Collective Wrongdoing (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 261–286.Google Scholar

Evans, Malcolm, ‘State Responsibility and the European Convention on Human Rights: Role and Realm’, in Fitzmaurice, Malgosia and Sarooshi, Dan (eds.), Issues of State Responsibility before International Judicial Institutions (Oxford and Portland, OR: Bloomsbury, 2004), pp. 139–160.Google Scholar

Farell, Norman, ‘Attributing Criminal Liability to Corporate Actors: Some Lessons from the International Tribunals’ (2010) 8 Journal of International Criminal Justice 873–894.Google Scholar

Farer, Tom J., ‘Restraining the Barbarians: Can International Criminal Law Help?’ (2000) 22 Human Rights Quarterly 90–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farrall, Jeremy, United Nations Sanctions and the Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Faure, Michael, ‘Concluding Remarks’, in Faure, Michael (ed.), Deterrence, Insurability, and Compensation in Environmental Liability. Future Developments in the European Union (Wien: Springer, 2003), pp. 331–343.Google Scholar

Faure, Michael, and Grimeaud, David, ‘Financial Assurance Issues of Environmental Liability’, in Faure, Michael (ed.), Deterrence, Insurability, and Compensation in Environmental Liability: Future Developments in the European Union (Wien: Springer, 2003), pp. 7–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Faure, Michael, and Nollkaemper, André, ‘International Liability as an Instrument to Prevent and Compensate for Climate Change’ (2007) 43 A Stanford Journal of International Law 123–179.Google Scholar

Favre, Antoine, ‘Fault as an Element of the Illicit Act’ (1963–1964) 52 Georgetown Law Journal 555–570.Google Scholar

Feller, Abraham H., ‘The Mexican Claims Commissions’ (1933–1934) 19 Iowa Law Review 225–230.Google Scholar

Finch, George A., ‘The Nuremberg Trial and International Law’ (1947) 41 American Journal of International Law 20–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finnemore, Martha, and Hollis, Duncan B., ‘Constructing Norms for Global Cybersecurity’ (2016) 110 American Journal of International Law 425–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, Kirsten J., ‘The Distinct Character of International Crime: Theorizing the Domain’ (2009) 8 Contemporary Political Theory 44–67.Google Scholar

Fisse, Brent, and Braithwaite, John, ‘The Allocation of Responsibility for Corporate Crime: Individualism, Collectivism and Accountability’ (1986–1988) 11 Sydney Law Review 468–513.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, ‘International Responsibility and Liability’, in Bodansky, Daniel, Brunnée, Jutta and Hey, Ellen (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 1010–1035.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Malgosia A., ‘International Environmental Law as a Special Field’, in Barnhoorn, L. A. N. M. and Wellens, Karel C. (eds.), Diversity in Secondary Rules and the Unity of International Law (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1995), pp. 181–226.Google Scholar

Fletcher, George P., ‘The Storrs Lectures: Liberals and Romantics at War: The Problem of Collective Guilt’ (2001–2002) 111 Yale Journal of International Law 1499–1573.Google Scholar

Fletcher, George P., Romantics at War: Glory and Guilt in the Age of Terrorism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Focarelli, Carlo, ‘International Law and Third-party Countermeasures in the Age of Global Instant Communication’ (2016) 29 Questions of International Law 17–24.Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas, Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas, ‘Individual Criminal Liability and Collective Civil Responsibility: Do They Reinforce or Contradict One Another?’ (2007) 6 Washington University Global Studies Law Review 567–573.Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M., ‘Legitimacy in the International System’ (1988) 82 American Journal of International Law 705–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuller, Lon, The Morality of Law (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1964).Google Scholar

Fuller, Lon L. ‘Law as an Instrument of Social Control and Law as a Facilitation of Human Interaction’ (1975) Brigham Young University Law Review 89–96.Google Scholar

Fyrnys, Markus, ‘Expanding Competences by Judicial Lawmaking: The Pilot Judgment Procedure of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2011) 12 German Law Journal 1231–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaines, Sanford E., ‘The Polluter-Pays Principle: From Economic Equity to Environmental Ethos’ (1991) 26 Texas International Law Journal 463–496.Google Scholar

Gaja, Giorgio, ‘Positivism and Dualism in Dionisio Anzilotti’ (1992) 3 European Journal of International Law 123–138.Google Scholar

Garcia, Frank J., ‘Globalization and the Theory of International Law’ (2005) 11 International Legal Theory 9–26.Google Scholar

García Amador, F. V., ‘State Responsibility in the Light of New Trends of International Law’ (1955) 49 American Journal of International Law 339–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

García Amador, Francisco V., Sohn, Louis B., and Baxter, Richard R., Recent Codification of the Law of State Responsibility for Injuries to Aliens (Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications, 1974).Google Scholar

Garland, David, ‘Sociological Perspectives on Punishment’ (1991) 14 Crime and Justice 115–165.Google Scholar

Gattini, Andrea, ‘A Return Ticket to Communitarisme, Please’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law 1181–1199.Google Scholar

Gilligan, Michael J., ‘Is Enforcement Necessary for Effectiveness? A Model of the International Criminal Law Regime’ (2006) 60 International Organization 935–967.Google Scholar

Goebel, Jr., Julius, ‘The International Responsibility of States for Injuries Sustained by Aliens on Account of Mob Violence, Insurrections and Civil Wars’ (1914) 8 American Journal of International Law 802–852.Google Scholar

Goldie, L. F. E., ‘Liability for Damage and the Progressive Development of International Law’ (1965) 14 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1189–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldmann, Matthias, ‘Implementing the Rome Statute in Europe: From Sovereign Distinction to Convergence in International Criminal Law’ (2005) XVI Finnish Yearbook of International Law 5–29.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, Jack, ‘The Self-Defeating International Criminal Court’ (2003) 70 University of Chicago Law Review 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldsmith, Jack L., and Posner, Eric A., The Limits of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Goodwin-Gill, Guy S., ‘State Responsibility and the “Good Faith” Obligation in International Law’, in Fitzmaurice, Malgosia and Sarooshi, Dan (eds.), Issues of State Responsibility before International Judicial Institutions (Oxford and Portland, OR: Bloomsbury, 2004), pp. 75–104.Google Scholar

Gordon, Gregory S., ‘The Trial of Peter von Hagenbach: Reconciling History, Historiography and International Criminal Law’, in Heller, Kevin Jon and Simpson, Gerry (eds.), The Hidden Histories of War Crimes Trials (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 13–49.Google Scholar

Gowlland-Debbas, Vera, ‘Security Council Enforcement Actions and Issues of State Responsibility’ (1994) 43 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 55–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, Christine, ‘The Different Forms of Reparation: Restitution’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 589–597.Google Scholar

Green, Leslie, ‘Introduction’, in Hart, H. L. A. (ed.), The Concept of Law (1st published 1961, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Griebel, Jörn, and Plücken, Milan, ‘New Developments Regarding the Rules of Attribution? The International Court of Justice’s Decision in Bosnia v. Serbia’ (2008) 21 Leiden Journal of International Law 601–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gros Espiell, Héctor, ‘International Responsibility of the State and Individual Criminal Responsibility in the International Protection of Human Rights’, in Ragazzi, Maurizio (ed.), International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005), pp. 151–160.Google Scholar

Grossman, Claudio, and Bradlow, Daniel D., ‘Are We Being Propelled Towards A People-Centered Transnational Legal Order’ (1993–1994) 9 American University Journal of International Law and Policy 1–26.Google Scholar

Grotius, Hugo, De jure belli ac pacis libri tres (1625) (trans. Kelsey, Francis W., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1925).Google Scholar

Guha Roy, S. N., ‘Is the Law of Responsibility of States for Injuries to Aliens A Part of Universal International Law?’ (1961) 55 American Journal of International Law 863–891.Google Scholar

Guzman, Andrew T., ‘Saving Customary International Law’ (2005) 27 Michigan Journal of International Law 115–176.Google Scholar

Hafner, Gerhard, ‘Accountability of International Organizations’ (2003) 97 American Society of International Law Proceedings 236–237.Google Scholar

Hall, Christopher Keith, ‘The First Proposal for a Permanent International Criminal Court’ (1998) International Review of the Red Cross 57–74.Google Scholar

Hall, William Edward, A Treatise on International Law (8th ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924).Google Scholar

Hart, Jr., Henry M., ‘The Aims of the Criminal Law’ (1958) 23 Law and Contemporary Problems 401–441.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A., Law, Liberty and Morality (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hawkins, Gordon, ‘Punishment and Deterrence: The Educative, Moralizing, and Habituating Effects’ (1969) Wisconsin Law Review 550–565.Google Scholar

Heathcote, Sarah, ‘Necessity’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 491–501.Google Scholar

Heffter, August Wilhelm, Le droit international public de L’Europe (trans. Bergson, Jules, Paris: Cotillon, 1857).Google Scholar

Heikkilä, Mikaela, International Criminal Tribunals and Victims of Crime: A Study of the Status of Victims before International Criminal Tribunals and of Factors Affecting This Status (Turku: Åbo Akademi University, 2004).Google Scholar

Heikkilä, Mikaela, Coping with International Atrocities through Criminal Law. A Study into the Typical Features of International Criminality and the Reflection of These Traits in International Criminal Law (Turku: Åbo Akademi University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Helfer, Laurence R., and Wuerth, Ingrid, Custom in the Age of Soft Law (Working Paper).Google Scholar

Helfer, Laurence R., and Wuerth, Ingrid B., ‘Customary International Law: An Instrument Choice Perspective’ (2016) 37 Michigan Journal of International Law 563–609.Google Scholar

Henzelin, Marc, Heiskanen, Veijo, and Mettraux, Guénaël, ‘Reparations to Victims before the International Criminal Court: Lessons from International Mass Claims Processes’ (2006) 17 Criminal Law Forum 317–344.Google Scholar

Hessbruegge, Jan Arno, ‘The Historical Development of the Doctrines of Attribution and Due Diligence in International Law’ (2004) 36 New York University Journal of International Law & Politics 265–306.Google Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn, Problems & Progress: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn, ‘Issues of State Responsibility before the International Court of Justice’, in Fitzmaurice, Malgosia and Sarooshi, Dan (eds.), Issues of State Responsibility before International Judicial Institutions (Oxford and Portland, OR: Bloomsbury, 2004), pp. 1–9.Google Scholar

Hillebrecht, Courtney, ‘The Deterrent Effect of the International Criminal Court: Evidence from Libya’ (2016) 42 International Interactions 616–643.Google Scholar

Hobe, Stephan, ‘The Era of Globalisation as a Challenge to International Law’ (2001– 2002) 40 Duquesne University Law Review 655–665.Google Scholar

Hofmann, Claudia, Learning in Modern International Society: On the Cognitive Problem Solving Abilities of Political Actors (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2008).Google Scholar

Holland, Thomas Erskine, Studies in International Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1898).Google Scholar

Huang, Zhxiong, ‘The Attribution Rules in the ILC Articles on State Responsibility: A Preliminary Assessment on Their Application in Cyber Operation’ (2014) 14 Baltic Yearbook of International Law 41–54.Google Scholar

Hudson, Manley O., International Tribunals: Past and Future (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace & Brookings Institute, 1944).Google Scholar

Hurd, Ian, ‘Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics’ (1999) 53 International Organization 379–408.Google Scholar

Isaacs, Tracy, ‘Introduction’, in Isaacs, Tracy and Vernon, Richard (eds.), Accountability for Collective Wrongdoing (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 1–19.Google Scholar

Jackson, Robert H., ‘Opening Statement before the International Military Tribunal (1945)’, reproduced in May, Larry and Brown, Jeff (eds.), Philosophy of Law: Classic and Contemporary Readings (Malden and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010), pp. 435–440.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Kyle Rex, ‘Doing Business with the Devil: The Challenges of Prosecuting Corporate Officials Whose Business Transactions Facilitate War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity’ (2005) 56 Air Force Law Review 167–232.Google Scholar

Jamieson, Ruth, and McEvoy, Kieran, ‘State Crime by Proxy and Juridical Othering’ (2005) 45 British Journal of Criminology 504–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jessberger, F., and Geneuss, J., ‘Down the Drain or Down to Earth? International Criminal Justice under Pressure’ (2013) 11 Journal of International Criminal Justice 501–503.Google Scholar

Jessup, Philip C., ‘Responsibility of States for Injuries to Individuals’ (1946) 46 Columbia Law Review 903–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jinks, Derek, ‘State Responsibility for the Acts of Private Armed Groups’ (2003) 4 Chicago Journal of International Law 83–95.Google Scholar

Jo, Hyeran, and Simmons, Beth A., ‘Can the International Criminal Court Deter Atrocity?’ (2016) 70 International Organization 443–475.Google Scholar

Johnston, Douglas M., ‘Functionalism in the Theory of International Law’ (1988) 26 Canadian Yearbook of International Law 3–60.Google Scholar

Johnstone, Rachael Lorna, ‘State Responsibility: A Concerto for Court, Council and Committee’ (2008) 37 Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 63–118.Google Scholar

Jones, Annika, ‘Seeking International Criminal Justice in Syria’ (2013) 89 International Law Studies 802–816.Google Scholar

Jørgensen, Nina H. B., The Responsibility of States for International Crimes (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Jørgensen, Nina H. B., ‘Criminality of Organizations under International Law’, in Nollkaemper, André and van der Wilt, Harmen (eds.), System Criminality in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 201–221.Google Scholar

Kaplan, Margo, ‘Using Collective Interests to Ensure Human Rights: An Analysis of the Articles on State Responsibility’ (2004) 79 New York University Law Review 1902–1933.Google Scholar

Kaul, Hans-Peter, ‘Developments at the International Criminal Court. Construction Site for More Justice: The International Criminal Court after Two Years’ (2005) 99 American Journal of International Law 370–384.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, ‘Théorie du droit international public’ (1953–III) 84 Recueil des cours 1–204.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Principles of International Law (3rd printing, Clark: The Lawbook Exchange Ltd, 1959).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, General Theory of Law and State (1st published 1945, trans. Wedberg, Anders, Clark: Lawbook Exchange, 2007).Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan, ‘The Stages of the Decline of the Public/Private Division’ (1981–1982) 130 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1349–1357.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Kevin C., ‘A Critical Appraisal of Criminal Deterrence Theory’ (1983–1984) 88 Dickinson Law Review 1–13.Google Scholar

Kerbat, Yann, ‘Interaction between the Forms of Reparation’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 573–587.Google Scholar

Kersten, Mark, ‘A Little Less Isolated and a Lot More Troubling: Ban Ki-moon meets Bashir’, 5 September 2012, Justice in Conflict, justiceinconflict.org/2012/09/05/a-little-less-isolated-and-a-lot-more-troubling-ban-ki-moon-meets-bashir/ (accessed 10 June 2015).Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, and Donaldson, Megan, ‘From Bilateralism to Publicness in International Law’, in Fastenrath, Ulrich, Geiger, Rudolf and Khan, Daniel-Erasmus et al. (eds.), From Bilateralism to Community Interests: Essays in Honour of Judge Bruno Simma (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 79–89.Google Scholar

Kirchner, Stefan, ‘Relative Normativity and the Constitutional Dimension of International Law: A Place for Values in the International Legal System’ (2004) 5 German Law Journal 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirsch, Philippe, Holmes, John T., and Johnson, Mora, ‘International Tribunals and Courts’, in Malone, David M. (ed.), The UN Security Council: From the Cold War to the 21st Century (London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2004), pp. 281–294.Google Scholar

Kiss, Alexandre, ‘L’accident de Tchernobyl: ses consequences au point de vue du Droit international’ (1986) 32 Annuaire français de droit international 139–152.Google Scholar

Kiss, Alexandre, ‘State Responsibility and Liability for Nuclear Damage’ (2006) 35 Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 67–83.Google Scholar

Kiss, Alexandre, and Shelton, Dinah, International Environmental Law (2nd ed., Ardsley, New York: Transnational Publishers, 2000).Google Scholar

Kiss, Alexandre, and Shelton, Dinah, ‘Strict Liability in International Environmental Law’, in Ndiaye, Tafsir Malick and Wolfrum, Rüdiger (eds.), Law of the Sea, Environmental Law and Settlement of Disputes: Liber Amicorum Judge Thomas A. Mensah (Leiden: Brill, 2007), pp. 1131–1151.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, ‘Just Revenge? The Deterrence Argument in International Criminal Law’ (2001) XII Finnish Yearbook of International Law 249–267.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, ‘Reflections on Soft International Law in a Privatized World’ (2005) XVI Finnish Yearbook of International Law 313–328.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, ‘Compliance Procedures’, in Bodansky, Daniel, Brunnée, Jutta and Hey, Ellen (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 995–1009.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, ‘Constitutionalism and the Making of International Law: Fuller’s Procedural Natural Law’ (2008) 5 NoFo 84–112.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, ‘Setting the Scene’, in Klabbers, Jan, Peters, Anne and Ulfstein, Geir (eds.), The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 1–44.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, ‘Law, Ethics and Global Governance: Accountability in Perspective’ (2013) 11 New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law 309–321.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, ‘Responsibility of States and International Organisations in the Context of Cyber Activities with Special Reference to NATO’, in Ziolkowski, Katharina (ed.), Peacetime Regime for State Activities in Cyberspace: International Law, International Relations and Diplomacy (Tallinn: NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence, 2013), pp. 485–506.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, ‘Book Review on André Nollkaemper and Dov Jacobs (eds.), Distribution of Responsibilities in International Law’ (2016) 27 European Journal of International Law 541–551.Google Scholar

Kleffner, Jann K., ‘The Collective Accountability of Organized Armed Groups for System Crimes’, in Nollkaemper, André and van der Wilt, Harmen (eds.), System Criminality in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 238–269.Google Scholar

Klein, Pierre, ‘Responsibility for Serious Breaches of Obligations Deriving from Peremptory Norms of International Law and United Nations Law’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law 1241–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kleinlein, Thomas, ‘The Language of Public International Law’, in Société Française pour le droit international (ed.), Droit international et diversité des cultures juridiques (Paris: Pedone, 2008), pp. 199–208.Google Scholar

Kolb, Robert, The International Law of State Responsibility: An Introduction (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kopela, Sophia, ‘Civil and Criminal Liability as Mechanisms for the Prevention of Oil Pollution: The Erika Case’ (2011) 20 Review of the European Community & International Environmental Law 313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korhonen, Outi, and Selkälä, Toni, ‘Theorizing Responsibility’, in Orford, Anne and Hoffmann, Florian (eds.), The Oxford Handbook on the Theory of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), pp. 844–861.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, Valtion kansainvälinen vastuu yksityisen toiminnan aiheuttamasta kansainvälisestä ympäristövahingosta, Kansainvälisoikeudellinen päälaudaturkirjoitus (Turku: Turun Yliopisto, 1981).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘International Liability for Transfrontier Pollution Damage’ (1990) 2 International Environmental Affairs. A Journal for Research and Policy 309–316.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘The Politics of International Law’ (1990) 1 European Journal of International Law 4–32.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Ison-Beltin siltariita’ (1992) 8 Lakimies 1300–1332.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Hierarchy in International Law: A Sketch’ (1997) 8 European Journal of International Law 566–582.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Solidarity Measures: State Responsibility as a New International Order?’ (2001) 72 British Yearbook of International Law 337–356.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Between Impunity and Show Trials’ (2002) 6 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 1–35.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Hersch Lauterpacht and the Development of International Criminal Law’ (2004) 2 Journal of International Criminal Justice 810–825.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (reissue with new epilogue, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘International Law in Europe: Between Tradition and Renewal’ (2005) 16 European Journal of International Law 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law. Report of the Study Group of the International law Commission, UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.682 (13 April 2006).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and Politics’ (2007) 1 The Modern Law Review 1–30.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Doctrines of State Responsibility’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 45–51.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, The Politics of International Law (Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2011).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Humanity’s Law by Ruti G. Teitel’ (2012) 26 Ethics & International Law 395–398.Google Scholar

Kozma, Julia, Nowak, Manfred, and Scheinin, Martin, A World Court of Human Rights: Consolidated Statute and Commentary (Vienna, Graz: Neuer Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, 2010).Google Scholar

Kramer, Matthew H., ‘On the Moral Status of the Rule of Law’ (2004) 63 Cambridge Law Journal 65–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kress, Claus, ‘L’organe de facto en droit international public, réflexions sur l’imputation à l’Etat de l’acte d’un particulier à la lumière des développements récents’ (2001) 105 Revue Générale de Droit International Public 93–144.Google Scholar

Krieg, Andreas, and Rickli, Jean-Marc, Surrogate Warfare: The Transformation of War in the Twenty-first Century (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2019).Google Scholar

Krisch, Nico, ‘International Law in Times of Hegemony: Unequal Power and the Shaping of the International Legal Order’ (2005) 16 European Journal of International Law 369–408.Google Scholar

Ku, Julian, and Nzelibe, Jide, ‘Do International Criminal Tribunals Deter or Exacerbate Humanitarian Atrocities?’ (2006) 84 Washington University Law Review 777–833.Google Scholar

Kyriakakis, Joanna, ‘Australian Prosecution of Corporations for International Crimes. The Potential of the Commonwealth Criminal Code’ (2007) 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice 809–826.Google Scholar

Laithier, Lucie, ‘Private Codification Efforts’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 53–59.Google Scholar

Langlet, David, Prior Informed Consent and Hazardous Trade. Regulating Trade in Hazardous Goods at the Intersection of Sovereignty, Free Trade and Environmental Protection (Alphen aan den Rejin: Kluwer Law International, 2009).Google Scholar

Lanovoy, Vladyslav, Complicity and its Limits in the Law of International Responsibility (Oxford and Portland, OR: Bloomsbury, 2016).Google Scholar

Lanovoy, Vladyslav, ‘The Use of Force by Non-state Actors and the Limits of Attribution of Conduct’ (2017) 28 European Journal of International Law 563–585.Google Scholar

Lasok, David, ‘The Eichmann Trial’ (1962) 11 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 355–374.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch, The Function of Law in the International Community (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1933).Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch, International Law: Collected Papers, Vol. 1, General Works (ed. Lauterpacht, Elihu) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970).Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch, Private Law Sources and Analogies of International Law (first published by Longmans, Green and Co. Ltd: London, 1927, North Haven: Archon Books, 1970).Google Scholar

Lee, Edward G., and Sproule, D. W., ‘Liability for Damage Caused by Space Debris: The Cosmos 954 Claim’ (1988) 26 Canadian Yearbook of International Law 273–279.Google Scholar

Lefeber, René, Transboundary Environmental Interference and the Origins of State Liability (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1996).Google Scholar

Lehnardt, Chia, ‘Private Military Companies and State Responsibility’, in Chesterman, Simon and Lehnardt, Chia (eds.), From Mercenaries to Market (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 139–157.Google Scholar

Lehnardt, Chia, ‘Individual Liability of Private Military Personnel under International Criminal Law’ (2008) 19 European Journal of International Law 1015–1034.Google Scholar

Lehto, Marja, International Responsibility for Terrorist Acts: A Shift towards More Indirect Forms of Responsibility (Rovaniemi: Lapland University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Lehto, Marja, Indirect Responsibility for Terrorist Acts. Redefinition of the Concept of Terrorism Beyond Violent Acts (Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010).Google Scholar

Lesaffer, Randall, ‘Argument from Roman Law in Current International Law’ (2005) 16 European Journal of International Law 25–58.Google Scholar

Lewis, Margaret K., ‘An Analysis of State Responsibility for the Chinese-American Airplane Collision Incident’ (2002) 77 New York University Law Review 1404–1441.Google Scholar

Lillich, Richard B., ‘The Current Status of the Law of State Responsibility for Injuries to Aliens’, in Lillich, Richard B. (ed.), International Law of State Responsibility for Injuries to Aliens (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1983), pp. 1–61.Google Scholar

Linderfalk, Ulf, ‘The Functionality of Conceptual Terms in International Law and International Legal Discourse’ (2013/2014) 6 European Journal of Legal Studies 27–50.Google Scholar

Louka, Elli, International Environmental Law: Fairness, Effectiveness, and World Order (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Lowe, Vaughan, ‘The Iraq Crisis: What Now?’ (2003) 52 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 859–871.Google Scholar

Lu, Catherine, ‘The International Criminal Court as an Institution of Moral Regeneration: Problems and Prospects’, in Harrington, Joanna, Milde, Michael and Vernon, Richard (eds.), Bringing Power to Justice? The Prospects of the International Criminal Court (Montreal & Kingston: McGill’s-Queen University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Luban, David, ‘State Criminality and the Ambition of International Criminal Law’, in Isaacs, Tracy and Vernon, Richard (eds.), Accountability for Collective Wrongdoing (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 61–91.Google Scholar

Maison, Rafaëlle, La responsabilité individuelle pour crime d’État en droit international public (Bruxelles: Bruylant, 2004).Google Scholar

Malanczuk, Peter, Akehurst’s Modern Introduction to International Law (7th revised ed., London and New York: Routledge, 1997).Google Scholar

Mälksoo, Lauri, ‘State Responsibility and the Challenge of the Realist Paradigm: The Demand of Baltic Victims of Soviet Mass Repressions for Compensation from Russia’ (2003) 3 Baltic Yearbook of International Law 57–76.Google Scholar

Margulies, Peter, ‘Sovereignty and Cyber Attacks: Technology’s Challenge to the Law of State Responsibility’ (2013) 14 Melbourne Journal of International Law 1–24.Google Scholar

Marks, Stephen P., ‘Tying Prometheus Down: The International Law of Human Genetic Manipulation’ (2002) 3 Chicago Journal of International Law 115–136.Google ScholarPubMed

Marks, Susan, ‘State-Centrism, International Law and the Anxieties of Influence’ (2006) 19 Leiden Journal of International Law 339–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marston Danner, Allison, ‘The Nuremberg Industrialist Prosecutions and Aggressive War’ (2005–2006) 46 Virginia Journal of International Law 651–676.Google Scholar

Mason, Michael, ‘Transnational Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage: Examining Changing Spatialities of Environmental Liability’, LSE Research Papers in Environmental and Spatial Analysis, no 69 (2002), Department of Geography and Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK, 1–24.Google Scholar

Mason, Michael, ‘Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage: Examining the Evolving Scope for Environmental Compensation in the International Regime’ (2003) 27 Marine Policy 1–12.Google Scholar

Matsui, Yoshiro, ‘The Transformation of the Law of State Responsibility’, in Provost, René (ed.), State Responsibility in International Law (Dartmouth: Ashgate, 2002), pp. 3–63.Google Scholar

Mayer, Benoit, ‘Climate Change Reparations and the Law and Practice of State Responsibility’ (2017) 7 Asian Journal of International Law 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McAuliffe, Pádraig, ‘Suspended Disbelief? The Curious Endurance of the Deterrence Rationale in International Criminal Law’ (2012) 10 New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law 227–262.Google Scholar

McAuliffe, Padraig, ‘From Watchdog to Workhorse: Explaining the Emergence of the ICC’s Burden-sharing Policy as an Example of Creeping Cosmopolitanism’ (2014) 13 Chinese Journal of International Law 259–296.Google Scholar

McAuliffe, Pádraig, and Schwöbel-Patel, Christine, ‘Disciplinary Matchmaking. Critics of International Criminal Law Meet Critics of Liberal Peacebuilding’ (2018) 16 Journal of International Criminal Justice 985–1009.Google Scholar

McDougal, Myres S., Lasswell, Harold D., and Chen, Lung-Chu, Human Rights and World Public Order (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980).Google Scholar

McDougal, Myres S., Lasswell, Harold D., and Vlasic, Ivan A., Law and Public Order in Space (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1963).Google Scholar

McDougal, Myres S., and Schlei, Norbert A., ‘The Hydrogen Bomb Tests in Perspective: Lawful Measures for Security’ (1954–1955) 64 Yale Law Journal 648–710.Google Scholar

McRae, Ben, ‘Entry into Force of the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage: Opening the Umbrella’ (2015) Nuclear Law Bulletin 7–25.Google Scholar

Mégret, Frédéric, ‘Epilogue to an Endless Debate: The International Criminal Court’s Third Party Jurisdiction and the Looming Revolution of International Law’ (2001) 12 European Journal of International Law 247–268.Google Scholar

Mégret, Frédéric, ‘Accountability and Ethics’, in Reydams, Luc, Wouters, Jan and Ryngaert, Cedric (eds.), International Prosecutors (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 416–487.Google Scholar

Mégret, Frédéric, ‘Globalization’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Mégret, Frédéric, ‘State Responsibility for Aggression: A Human Rights Approach’ (2017) 58 Harvard International Law Online Journal 62–65.Google Scholar

Meron, Theodor, ‘State Responsibility for Violations of Human Rights’ (1989) 83 American Society of International Law Proceedings 372–385.Google Scholar

Meyer, Zach, ‘Private Commercialization of Space in an International Regime: A Proposal for a Space District’ (2010) 30 Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 241–261.Google Scholar

Milanović, Marko, and Papić, Tatjana, ‘As Bad as It Gets: The European Court of Human Rights’s Behrami and Saramati Decision and General International Law’ (2009) 58 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 267–297.Google Scholar

Miller, Justin, ‘Criminal Law – An Agency for Social Control’ (1934) 43 Yale Law Review 691–715.Google Scholar

Mohr, Manfred, ‘The ILC’s Distinction between “International Crimes” and “International Delicts” and Its Implications’, in Spinedi, Marina and Simma, Bruno (eds.), United Nations Codification of State Responsibility (New York: Oceana Publications, 1987), pp. 115–141.Google Scholar

Morgenthau, Hans, ‘Positivism, Functionalism, and International Law’ (1940) 34 American Journal of International Law 260–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morris, Madeleine, ‘High Crimes and Misconceptions: The ICC and Non-State Parties’ (2001) 64 Law & Contemporary Problems 13–66.Google Scholar

Morss, John R., International Law as the Law of Collectives: Toward a Law of People (Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2013).Google Scholar

Mosoti, Victor, ‘In Our Own Image, Not Theirs: Damages as an Antidote to the Remedial Deficiencies in the WTO Dispute Settlement Process; A View from Sub-Saharan Africa’ (2001) 19 Boston University International Law Journal 231–256.Google Scholar

Moyn, Samuel, ‘Towards Instrumentalism at the International Criminal Court’ (2014) 39 Yale Journal of International Law 55–65.Google Scholar

Mujezinović Larsen, Kjetil, ‘Attribution of Conduct in Peace Operations: The “Ultimate Authority and Control” Test’ (2008) 19 European Journal of International Law 509–531.Google Scholar

Müller, Andreas Th., and Stegmiller, Ignaz, ‘Self-Referrals on Trial. From Panacea to Patient’ (2010) 8 Journal of International Criminal Justice 1267–1294.Google Scholar

Müller, Daniel, ‘The Work of García Amador on State Responsibility for Injury Caused to Aliens’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 69–74.Google Scholar

Murphy, Liam, ‘International Responsibility’, in Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 299–315.Google Scholar

Mussa, Cerina Banu Issufo, Vossenaar, René, and Nakisisa Waniala, Nimrod, ‘Eastern and Southern Africa: The Experience of Kenya, Mozambique, The United Republic of Tanzania and Uganda’, in Jha, Veena (ed.), Environmental Regulation and Food Safety: Studies of Protection and Protectionism (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2005), pp. 103–144.Google Scholar

Nakatani, Kazuhiro, ‘Diplomacy and State Responsibility’, in Ragazzi, Maurizio (ed.), International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005), pp. 37–47.Google Scholar

Nerlich, Volker, ‘Core Crimes and Transnational Business Corporations’ (2010) 8 Journal of International Criminal Justice 895–908.Google Scholar

Nieminen, Katja, ‘The Rules of Attribution and the Private Military Contractors at Abu Ghraib: Private Acts or Public Wrongs?’ (2006) XV Finnish Yearbook of International Law 289–319.Google Scholar

Nissel, Alan T., ‘The Duality of State Responsibility’ (2013) 44 Columbia Human Rights Law Review 793–858.Google Scholar

Nissel, Tzvika Alan, A History of State Responsibility: The Struggle for International Standards (1870–1960) (Helsinki: University of Helsinki, 2016).Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, André, ‘Concurrence between Individual Responsibility and State Responsibility in International Law’ (2003) 52 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 615–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nollkaemper, André, ‘Cluster-litigation in Cases of Transboundary Environmental Harm’, in Faure, Michael and Ying, Song (eds.), China and International Environmental Liability: Legal Remedies for Transboundary Pollution (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 2008), pp. 11–37.Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, André, ‘Towards Public Responsibility in International Law’, conference presentation at Global Constitutionalism: Process and Substance, Kandersteg, 17–19 January 2008.Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, André, ‘Constitutionalization and the Unity of the Law of International Responsibility’ (2009) 16 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 535–563.Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, André, ‘State Responsibility for International Crimes: A Review of Principles of Reparation’, in Constantinides, Aristotle and Zaikos, Nikos (eds.), The Diversity of International Law: Essays in Honour of Professor Kalliopi K. Koufa (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009), pp. 487–518.Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, André, ‘Procedural Aspects of Shared Responsibility in International Adjudication. Introduction’ (2013) 4 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nollkaemper, André, and Jacobs, Dov, ‘Shared Responsibility in International Law: A Conceptual Framework’ (2012–2013) 34 Michigan Journal of International Law 359–438.Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, André, and Jacobs, Dov (eds.), Distribution of Responsibilities in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, André, and Jacobs, Dov, ‘Introduction: Mapping the Normative Framework’, in Nollkaemper, André and Jacobs, Dov (eds.), Distribution of Responsibilities in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 1–35.Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, André, and Plakokefalos, Ilias (eds.), Principles of Shared Responsibility in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, André, and Plakokefalos, Ilias (eds.), The Practice of Shared Responsibility in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, André, and van der Wilt, Harmen, ‘Conclusions and Outlook’, in Nollkaemper, André and van der Wilt, Harmen (eds.), System Criminality in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 338–353.Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, André, and van der Wilt, Harmen, ‘Preface’, in Nollkaemper, André and van der Wilt, Harmen (eds.), System Criminality in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. vii–viii.Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, André, and van der Wilt, Harmen, (eds.), System Criminality in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Nolte, Georg, ‘From Dionisio Anzilotti to Roberto Ago: The Classical International Law of State Responsibility and the Traditional Primacy of a Bilateral Conception of Inter-state Relations’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law 1033–1098.Google Scholar

Nolte, Georg, and Aust, Helmut Philipp, ‘Equivocal Helpers – Complicit States, Mixed Messages and International Law’ (2009) 58 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1–30.Google Scholar

Norrie, A., ‘“Simulacra of morality”? Beyond the Ideal/Actual Antinomies of Criminal Justice’, in Duff, Antony (ed.), Philosophy and Criminal Law: Principle and Critique (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 101–155.Google Scholar

Noyes, John E., and Smith, Brian D., ‘State Responsibility and the Principle of Joint and Several Liability’ (1988) 13 Yale Journal of International Law 225–267.Google Scholar

Ohlin, Jens David, ‘Three Conceptual Problems with the Doctrine of Joint Criminal Enterprise’ (2007) 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice 69–90.Google Scholar

Okowa, Phoebe, State Responsibility for Transboundary Air Pollution in International Law (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Okowa, Phoebe, ‘State and Individual Responsibility in Internal Conflicts: Contours of an Evolving Relationship’ (2009) 20 Finnish Yearbook of International Law 143–188.Google Scholar

Olleson, Simon, ‘Attribution in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2016) 31 ICSID Review 457–483.Google Scholar

Ormerod, David, Smith and Hogan Criminal Law (12th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Osaka, Eri, ‘Corporate Liability, Government Liability, and the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster’ (2012) 21 Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal 433–459.Google Scholar

Osiel, Mark J., ‘In Defense of Liberal Show Trials–Nuremberg and Beyond’, in Mettraux, Guénaël (ed.), Perspectives on the Nuremberg Trial (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 704–725.Google Scholar

Paddeu, Federica, ‘To Convene or Not to Convene? The Future Status of the Articles on State Responsibility: Recent Developments’ (2018) 21 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 83–123.Google Scholar

Palojärvi, Pia, A Battle in the Bits and Bytes: Computer Network Attacks and the Law of Armed Conflict. The Erik Castrén Institute Research Reports 27/2009 (Helsinki: The Erik Castrén Institute, 2009).Google Scholar

Paparinskis, Martins, ‘Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness in International Investment Law’ (2016) 31 ICSID Review 484–503.Google Scholar

Parlett, Kate, ‘The Application of the Rules on Countermeasures in Investment Claims. Visions and Realities of International Law as an Open System’, in Chinkin, Christine and Baetens, Freya (eds.), Sovereignty, Statehood and State Responsibility: Essays in Honour of James Crawford (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 389–405.Google Scholar

Paulus, Andreas, ‘From Territoriality to Functionality: Towards a Legal Methodology’, in Dekker, Ige F. and Wouter G., Werner (eds.), Governance and International Legal Theory (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2004), pp. 59–96.Google Scholar

Paulus, Andreas, ‘Reciprocity Revisited’, in Fastenrath, Ulrich, Geiger, Rudolf, Khan, Daniel-Erasmus et al. (eds.), From Bilateralism to Community Interest: Essays in Honour of Judge Bruno Simma (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 113–137.Google Scholar

Paulus, Andreas, ‘Whether Universal Values can Prevail over Bilateralism and Reciprocity’, in Cassese, Antonio (ed.), Realizing Utopia: The Future of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 89–104.Google Scholar

Paust, Jordan J., ‘My Lai and Vietnam: Norms, Myths and Leader Responsibility’ (1972) 57 Military Law Review 99–187.Google Scholar

Payne, Christian, ‘International Law Cannot Keep Up with Cyber-Criminals’, World Economic Forum, 25 February 2019, www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/02/why-international-law-is-failing-to-keep-pace-with-technology-in-preventing-cyber-attacks/ (accessed 20 May 2019).Google Scholar

Pellet, Alain, ‘Can a State Commit a Crime? Definitely, Yes!’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 425–434.Google Scholar

Pellet, Alain, ‘Les Articles de la C.D.I. sur la responsabilité de l’État pour fait internationalement illicite. Suite-et fin?’ (2002) 48 Annuaire francais de droit international 1–23.Google Scholar

Pellet, Alain, ‘The ILC’s Articles on State Responsibility for Internationally Wrongful Acts and Related Texts’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 75–94.Google Scholar

Pellet, Alain, ‘The Definition of Responsibility in International Law’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), Oxford Commentaries on International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 3–16.Google Scholar

Pellet, Alain, ‘Responsibility of States in Cases of Human-Rights or Humanitarian-law Violations’, in Crawford, James, Koroma, Abdul B., Mahmoudi, Said and Pellet, Alain (eds.), The International Legal Order: Current Needs and Possible Responses. Essays in Honour of Djamchid Momtaz (Leiden and Boston: Brill Nijhoff, 2017), pp. 230–251.Google Scholar

Peters, Anne, ‘International Dispute Settlement: A Network of Cooperational Duties’ (2003) 14 European Journal of International Law 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peters, Anne, ‘Membership in Global Constitutional Community’, in Klabbers, Jan, Peters, Anne and Ulfstein, Geir (eds.), The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 153–262.Google Scholar

Peters, Anne, ‘The Merits of Global Constitutionalism’ (2009) 16 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 397–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillimore, Robert, Commentaries upon International Law (3rd ed., London: Butterworths, 1879).Google Scholar

Pierik, Roland, ‘Shared Responsibility in International Law. A Normative-Philosophical Analysis’, in Nollkaemper, André and Jacobs, Dov (eds.), Distribution of Responsibilities in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 36–61.Google Scholar

Pitea, Cesare, ‘The Legal Status of NGOs in Environmental Non-Compliance Procedures: An Assessment of Law and Practice’, in Dupuy, Pierre-Marie and Vierucci, Luisa (eds.), NGOs in International Law: Efficiency in Flexibility? (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2008), pp. 181–203.Google Scholar

Plakokefalos, Ilias, ‘The Use of Force by Non-state Actors and the Limits of Attribution of Conduct: A Reply to Vladyslav Lanovoy’ (2017) 28 European Journal of International Law 587–593.Google Scholar

Posner, Eric, and Sykes, Alan O., ‘An Economic Analysis of State and Individual Responsibility under International Law’ (2007) 9 American Law and Economics Review 72–134.Google Scholar

Postema, Gerald J., ‘Custom in International Law: A Normative Practice Account’, in Perreau-Saussine, Amanda and Murphy, James Bernard (eds.), The Nature of Customary Law: Legal Historical and Philosophical Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 279–306.Google Scholar

Powles, Steven, ‘Joint Criminal Enterprise: Criminal Liability by Prosecutorial Ingenuity and Judicial Creativity?’ (2004) 2 Journal of International Criminal Justice 606–619.Google Scholar

Prost, Mario, ‘Hierarchy and the Sources of International Law: A Critique’ (2017) 39 Houston Journal of International Law 285–330.Google Scholar

Proulx, Vincent-Joël, Transnational Terrorism and State Accountability: A New Theory of Prevention (Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2012).Google Scholar

Proulx, Vincent-Joël, ‘An Uneasy Transition? Linkages between the Law of State Responsibility and the Law Governing the Responsibility of International Organizations’, in Ragazzi, Maurizio (ed.), Responsibility of International Organizations: Essays in Memory of Sir Ian Brownlie (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2013), pp. 109–120.Google Scholar

Proulx, Vincent-Joël, Institutionalizing State Responsibility: Global Security and UN Organs (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Proulx, Vincent-Joël, ‘The Marshall Islands Judgments and Multilateral Disputes at the World Court: Whither Access to International Justice?’ (2017) 111 AJIL Unbound 96–101.Google Scholar

Proulx, Vincent-Joël, ‘The World Court’s Jurisdictional Formalism and Its Lost Market Share: The Marshall Islands Decisions and the Quest for a Suitable Dispute Settlement Forum for Multilateral Disputes’ (2017) 30 Leiden Journal of International Law 925–946.Google Scholar

Proulx, Vincent-Joël, ‘International Civil Individual Responsibility and the Security Council: Building the Foundations of a General Regime’ (2019) 40 Michigan Journal of International Law 215–287.Google Scholar

Provost, René (ed.), State Responsibility in International Law (Dartmouth: Ashgate, 2002).Google Scholar

Quéneudec, Jean-Pierre, La responsabilité internationale de l’État pour les fautes personelles de ses agents (Paris: Pichon et Durand-Auzias, 1966).Google Scholar

Radetzki, Marcus, and Radetzki, Marian, ‘Private Arrangements to Cover Large-Scale Liabilities Caused by Nuclear and Other Industrial Catastrophes’ (2000) 25 The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance 180–195.Google Scholar

Ragazzi, Maurizio (ed.), International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005).Google Scholar

Ralph, Jason, ‘International Society, the International Criminal Court and US Foreign Policy’ (2005) 31 Review of International Studies 27–44.Google Scholar

Ratner, Steven R., ‘The Schizophrenias of International Criminal Law’ (1998) 33 Texas International Law Journal 237–256.Google Scholar

Ratner, Steven R., ‘The International Criminal Court and the Limits of Global Judicialization’ (2003) 38 Texas International Law Journal 445–454.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, ‘The Rule of Law and Its Virtue’, in Raz, Joseph (ed.), The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970), pp. 210–229.Google Scholar

Recalde Vela, Maria Jose, ‘Statelessness at the United Nations Compensation Commission’, Institute on Statelessness and Inclusion, Statelessness Working Paper Series No. 2015/03, December 2015.Google Scholar

Redgwell, Catherine, ‘The Wrong Trousers: State Responsibility and International Environmental Law’, in Evans, Malcolm and Koutrakos, Panos (eds.), The International Responsibility of the European Union: European and International Perspectives (Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2013), pp. 257–274.Google Scholar

Reid, Natalie L., ‘Bridging the Conceptual Chasm: Superior Responsibility as the Missing Link between State and Individual Responsibility in International Law’ (2005) 18 Leiden Journal of International Law 795–828.Google Scholar

Reis, Tarcísio Hardman, Compensation for Environmental Damages under International Law: The Role of the International Judge (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2011).Google Scholar

Reisman, Michael W., ‘Legal Responses to Genocide and Other Massive Violations of Human Rights’ (1996) 59 Law & Contemporary Problems 75–80.Google Scholar

Reuter, Paul, ‘Principes de droit international public’ (1961–II) 103 Receuil des Cours Annuaire de Droit International 425.Google Scholar

Reuter, Paul, Droit International Public (Paris: Dalloz, 1973).Google Scholar

Reuter, Paul, ‘Trois observations sur le codification de la responsabilité international des Etats pour fait illicite’ (1991) Le droit international au service de la paix, de la justice et du développement. Etudes dédiées à la mémoire de Michel Virally 389–398.Google Scholar

Reydams, Luc, ‘Universal Jurisdiction over Atrocities in Rwanda: Theory and Practice’ (1996) 4 European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 18–47.Google Scholar

Roach Anleu, Sharyn L., ‘The Role of Civil Sanctions in Social Control: A Socio-Legal Examination’ (1998) 9 Crime Prevention Studies 21–43.Google Scholar

Roberts, Anthea, ‘Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: Reconciliation’ (2001) 95 American Journal of International Law 757–791.Google Scholar

Romero Philips, Christen, ‘The International Criminal Court & Deterrence. A Report to the Office of Global Criminal Justice, U.S. Department of State’, Stanford Law School: Law & Policy Lab, June 2016.Google Scholar

Root, Elihu, ‘The Basis of Protection to Citizens Residing Abroad’ (1910) 4 American Journal of International Law 517–528.Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, Friedrich, ‘Collective Reparations for Victims of Armed Conflicts’ (2010) 92 International Review of the Red Cross 731–746.Google Scholar

Rosenstock, Robert, ‘The ILC and State Responsibility’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 792–797.Google Scholar

Roth, Kenneth, ‘Africa Attacks the International Criminal Court’, New York Review of Books, 6 February 2014.Google Scholar

Roucounas, Emmanuel, ‘Non-State Actors: Areas of International Responsibility in Need of Further Exploration’, in Ragazzi, Maurizio (ed.), International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005), pp. 391–404.Google Scholar

Sabahi, Borzu, Compensation and Restitution in Investor-State Arbitration: Principles and Practice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Sachariew, Kamen, ‘The Definition of Thresholds of Tolerance of Transboundary Environmental Injury Under International Law: Development and Present Status’ (1990) 37 Netherlands International Law Review 193–206.Google Scholar

Sadat, Leila Nadya, The International Criminal Court and the Transformation of International Law: Justice for the New Millennium (Ardsley, New York: Transnational Publishers, 2002).Google Scholar

Sadat, Leila Nadya, ‘The Legacy of the ICTY: The International Criminal Court’ (2003) 37 New England Law Review 1073–1080.Google Scholar

Sadat, Leila Nadya, ‘The French Experience’, in Cherif Bassiouni, M. (ed.), International Criminal Law: Volume III. International Enforcement (3rd ed., Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008), pp. 329–358.Google Scholar

Sadat, Leila Nadya, (ed.), Seeking Accountability for the Unlawful Use of Force (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Sadat, Leila Nadya, and Carden, Richard S., ‘The New International Criminal Court: An Uneasy Revolution’ (1999–2000) 88 Georgetown Law Journal 381–474.Google Scholar

Saland, Per, ‘International Criminal Law Principles’, in Lee, Roy S. (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1999), pp. 189–216.Google Scholar

Sands, Philippe, Principles of International Environmental Law (2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Schabas, William A., An Introduction to the International Criminal Court (3rd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Schabas, William A., War Crimes and Human Rights: Essays on the Death Penalty, Justice and Accountability (London: Cameron May, 2008).Google Scholar

Schachter, Oscar, ‘The Quasi-Judicial Rôle of the Security Council and the General Assembly’ (1964) 58 American Journal of International Law 960–965.Google Scholar

Schachter, Oscar, ‘The Emergence of International Environmental Law’ (1991) 44 Journal of International Affairs 457–493.Google Scholar

Schachter, Oscar, International Law in Theory and Practice (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1991).Google Scholar

Scheffer, David J., ‘Milosevic, Killing Fields, and “Kangaroo” Courts: Symposium on an Emerging International Criminal Justice System. Should the United States Join the International Criminal Court?’ (2002) 9 University of California Davis Journal of International Law & Policy 45–52.Google Scholar

Schense, Jennifer, and Carter, Linda (eds.), Two Steps Forward, One Step Back: The Deterrent Effect of International Criminal Tribunals (Brussels: Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, 2017).Google Scholar

Schmalenbach, Kirsten, ‘Dispute Settlement’, in Klabbers, Jan and Wallendahl, Åsa (eds.), Research Handbook on the Law of International Organizations (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011), pp. 251–284.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Michael N. (ed.), Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Schmitt, Michael N., and Vihul, Liis, ‘Proxy Wars in Cyberspace: The Evolving International Law of Attribution’ (2014) 1 Fletcher Security Review 53–72.Google Scholar

Schoen, Paul, Die völkerrechtliche Haftung der Staaten aus unerlaubten Handlungen, Ergänzungsheft 2, zur Zeitschrift für Völkerrecht Band X (Breslau: J. U. Kern’s Verlag, 1917).Google Scholar

Schwartz, Priscilla, ‘The Polluter-Pays Principle’, in Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, Ong, David M. and Merkouris, Panos (eds.), Research Handbook on International Environmental Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, 2010), pp. 243–261.Google Scholar

Scobbie, Iain, ‘The Invocation of Responsibility for the Breach of “Obligations under Peremptory Norms of General International Law”’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law 1201–1220.Google Scholar

Scott, Sterling, ‘Codification of State Responsibility in International Law: A Review and Assessment’ (1985) 9 ASILS International Law Journal 1–36.Google Scholar

Scovazzi, Tullio, ‘Some Remarks on International Responsibility in the Field of Environmental Protection’, in Ragazzi, Maurizio (ed.), International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005), pp. 209–222.Google Scholar

Shelton, Dinah, ‘Protecting Human Rights in a Globalized World’ (2002) 25 Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 273–322.Google Scholar

Shelton, Dinah, ‘Righting Wrongs: Reparations in the Articles on State Responsibility’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 833–856.Google Scholar

Shelton, Dinah, ‘Normative Hierarchy in International Law’ (2006) 100 American Journal of International Law 291–323.Google Scholar

Shelton, Dinah, Remedies in International Human Rights Law (2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Shiju, M. V., ‘Standard of Liability under the Cartagena Protocol’, in Raju, K. D. (ed.), Genetically Modified Organisms: Emerging Law and Policy in India (New Delhi: Teri Press, 2007), pp. 79–91.Google Scholar

Short, Nicola, ‘The Role of NGOs in the Ottawa Process to Ban Landmines’ (1999) 4 International Negotiation 481–500.Google Scholar

Sicilianos, Linos-Alexander, ‘The Classification of Obligations and the Multilateral Dimension of the Relations of International Responsibility’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law 1127–1145.Google Scholar

Simma, Bruno, ‘Bilateralism and Community Interest in the Law of State Responsibility’, in Dinstein, Yoram (ed.), International Law at a Time of Perplexity: Essays in Honour of Shabtai Rosenne (Dordrecht: Martinus Njihoff Publishers, 1989), pp. 821–844.Google Scholar