Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T16:27:19.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2018

David Altman
Affiliation:
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alan I. 2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Abramson, Paul R., and Inglehart, Ronald. 1992. “Generational Replacement and Value Change in Eight West European Societies.” British Journal of Political Science 22 (2):183228.Google Scholar
Adserà, Alícia, Boix, Carles, and Payne, J. Mark. 2003. “Are You Being Served? Political Accountability and Quality of Government.” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 19 (2):445–90.Google Scholar
Aguiar-Conraria, Luís, and Magalhães, Pedro C.. 2010a. “How Quorum Rules Distort Referendum Outcomes: Evidence from a Pivotal Voter Model.” European Journal of Political Economy 26 (4):541–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguiar-Conraria, Luís, and Magalhães, Pedro C.. 2010b. “Referendum Design, Quorum Rules and Turnout.” Public Choice 144 (1–2):6381.Google Scholar
Aidt, Toke S., and Jensen, Peter S.. 2016. “From Open to Secret Ballot: Vote Buying and Modernization.” Comparative Political Studies 50 (5):555–93.Google Scholar
Aimer, Peter, and Miller, Raymond. 2002. “Partisanship and Principle: Voters and the New Zealand Electoral Referendum of 1993.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (6):795809.Google Scholar
Aisch, Gregor, Pearce, Adam, and Rousseau, Bryant. 2016. “How Far Is Europe Swinging to the Right?” The New York Times, July 5.Google Scholar
Aitamurto, Tanja. 2016. “Crowdsourced Democratic Deliberation in Open Policymaking: Definition, Promises, Challenges.” Internationales Institut für Sozio-Informatik 13 (1):6172.Google Scholar
Albert, Victor. 2016. The Limits to Citizen Power: Participatory Democracy and the Entanglements of the State. London: Pluto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John. 1993. “Rational Choice and Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1):246–78.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1995. Partisan Politics, Divided Government and the Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alonso, Sonia, Keane, John, and Merkel, Wolfgang, eds. 2011. The Future of Representative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Altman, David. 2002. “Popular Initiatives in Uruguay: Confidence Votes on Government or Political Loyalties?Electoral Studies 21 (4):617–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, David. 2011. Direct Democracy Worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Altman, David. 2013a. “Bringing Direct Democracy Back In: Toward a Three-Dimensional Measure of Democracy.” Democratization 20 (4):615–41.Google Scholar
Altman, David. 2013b. “Does an Active Use of Mechanisms of Direct Democracy Impact on Electoral Participation? Evidence from the U.S. States and the Swiss Cantons.” Local Government Studies 39 (6):739–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, David. 2014a. “Direct Democracy in Latin America.” In Referendums around the World: The Continued Growth of Direct Democracy, ed. Qvortrup, M.. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Altman, David. 2014b. “Strengthening Democratic Quality: Reactive Deliberation in the Context of Direct Democracy.” The Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame. Working Paper 400.Google Scholar
Altman, David. 2017. “The Potential of Direct Democracy: A Global Measure (1900–2014).” Social Indicators Research 133 (3):1207–27.Google Scholar
Altman, David, and Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2002. “Assessing the Quality of Democracy: Freedom, Competitiveness, and Participation in Eighteen Latin American Countries.” Democratization 9 (2):85100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, David, Luna, Juan Pablo, Piñeiro, Rafael, and Toro, Sergio. 2009. “Partidos y sistemas de partidos en América Latina: Aproximaciones desde la encuesta a expertos 2009.” Revista de Ciencia Política 29 (3):775–98.Google Scholar
Andersen, Vibeke N., and Hansen, Kasper M.. 2007. “How Deliberation Makes Better Citizens: The Danish Deliberative Poll on the Euro.” European Journal of Political Research 46 (4):531–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, Gertrude. 1976. “On Frustration of the Majority by Fulfilment of the Majority’s Will.” Analysis 36 (4):161–8.Google Scholar
Antonsich, Marco. 2010. “Mapping the Swiss Referendum on the Minaret Ban.” Political Geography 29 (2):5762.Google Scholar
Aravantinou Leonidi, Giulia. 2014. “The Abrogative Referendum in the Italian Constitution: Threat or Opportunity?” Paper read at IX World Congress of Constitutional Law, June 16–20, Oslo.Google Scholar
Arceneaux, Kevin. 2002. “Direct Democracy and the Link between Public Opinion and State Abortion Policy.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 2 (4):372–87.Google Scholar
Auer, Andreas. 2007. “National Referendums in the Process of European Integration: Time for Change.” In The European Constitution and National Constitutions: Ratification and Beyond, eds. Albi, A. and Ziller, J.. Amsterdam: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1997. “The Dissemination of Culture: A Model with Local Convergence and Global Polarization.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (2):203–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Lonce H., and Mileur, Jerome M., eds. 2015. In Defense of the Founders Republic: Critics of Direct Democracy in the Progressive Era. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Bakker, Ryan, de Vries, Catherine, Edwards, Erica, Hooghe, Liesbet, Jolly, Seth, Marks, Gary, Polk, Jonathan, Rovny, Jan, Steenbergen, Marco, Vachudova, Milada Anna, and Bakker, Ryan. 2015. “Measuring Party Positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File, 1999–2010.” Party Politics 21 (1):143–52.Google Scholar
Baldacchino, Godfrey. 2012. “Islands and Despots.” Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 50 (1):103–20.Google Scholar
Barbera, Augusto, and Morrone, Andrea. 2003. La Repubblica dei Referendum. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Barczak, Monica. 2001. “Representation by Consultation? The Rise of Direct Democracy in Latin America.” Latin American Politics & Society 43 (3):3759.Google Scholar
Barnes, William A. 1998. “Incomplete Democracy in Central America: Polarization and Voter Turnout in Nicaragua and El Salvador.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 40 (3):63101.Google Scholar
Bauer, Paul C., and Fatke, Matthias. 2014. “Direct Democracy and Political Trust: Enhancing Trust, Initiating Distrust–or Both?Swiss Political Science Review 20 (1):4969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechtel, Michael M., Hangartner, Dominik, and Schmid, Lukas. 2016. “Does Compulsory Voting Increase Support for Leftist Policy?American Journal of Political Science 60 (3):752–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, A. Derrick Jr. 1978. “The Referendum: Democracy’s Barrier to Racial Equality.” Washington Law Review 54 (1):129.Google Scholar
Benedict, Burton. 1967. “Sociological Aspects of Smallness.” In Problems of Smaller Territories, ed. Benedict, B.. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1996. “Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Benhabib, S.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Benoit, Kenneth. 2004. “Models of Electoral System Change.” Electoral Studies 23 (3):363–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benz, Matthias, and Stutzer, Alois. 2004. “Are Voters Better Informed When They Have a Larger Say in Politics? Evidence for the European Union and Switzerland.” Public Choice 119 (1–2):3159.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L., and Neuhaus, Richard John. 1977. To Empower People: From State to Civil Society. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Berman, Sheri. 1997. “Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic.” World Politics 49 (3):401–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernauer, Julian, and Vatter, Adrian. 2012. “Can’t Get No Satisfaction with the Westminster Model? Winners, Loser, and the Effects of Consensual and Direct Democratic Institutions on Satisfaction with Democracy.” European Journal of Political Research 51 (4):435–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Christopher R. 2009. “Direct Democracy and Redistribution.” The Harris School of Public Policy Studies, The University of Chicago. Working Paper #09.05.Google Scholar
Bickel, Alexander M. 1986 [1962]. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bjørklund, Tor. 1982. “The Demand for Referendum: When Does It Arise and When Does It Succeed?Scandinavian Political Studies 5 (3):237–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjørklund, Tor. 2009. “The Surge of Referendums and the New Politics Approach.” In Referendums and Representative Democracy: Responsiveness, Accountability and Deliberation, eds. Setälä, M. and Schiller, T.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blasi, Joseph R. 1980. The Communal Future: The Kibbutz and the Utopian Dilemma. Norwood, PA: Norwood Editions.Google Scholar
Blomberg, Brock, Hess, Gregory D., and Weerapana, Akila. 2001. “The Impact of Voter Initiatives on Economic Activity.” Wellesley College. Working Paper 2001–07.Google Scholar
Boas, Marie-Hélène Sa Vilas. 2017. “The Genesis of Participatory Democracy in Brazil: A Scientific (Re)Construction.” Brazilian Political Science Review 11 (1):128.Google Scholar
Bobbio, Norberto. 1987. The Future of Democracy: A Defence of the Rules of the Game. New York: Polity.Google Scholar
Bochsler, Daniel, and Hug, Simon. 2015. “How Minorities Fare under Referendums: A Cross-National Study.” Electoral Studies 38:206–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehmke, Frederick J. 2002. “The Effect of Direct Democracy on the Size and Diversity of State Interest Group Populations.” Journal of Politics 64 (3):827–44.Google Scholar
Boehmke, Frederick J. 2005. “Sources of Variation in the Frequency of Statewide Initiatives: The Role of Interest Group Populations.” Political Research Quarterly 58 (4):575–85.Google Scholar
Bogdanor, Vernon. 1994. “Western Europe.” In Referendums around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy, eds. Butler, D. and Ranney, A.. Washington, DC: AEI Press.Google Scholar
Bohman, James. 1998. “The Coming Age of Deliberative Democracy.” Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (4):400–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles. 1999. “Setting the Rules of the Game: The Choice of Electoral Systems in Advanced Democracies.” American Political Science Review 93 (3):609–24.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth A., and Jackman, Robert W.. 1995. “Income Inequality and Democratization Revisited: Comment on Muller.” American Sociological Review 60 (6):983–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, and Donovan, Todd. 1998. Demanding Choices: Opinion, Voting, and Direct Democracy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, and Donovan, Todd. 2002a. “Democracy, Institutions, and Attitudes about Citizen Influence on Government.” British Journal of Political Science 32 (2):371–90.Google Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, and Donovan, Todd. 2002b. “Do Voters Have a Cue? Television Advertisements as a Source of Information in Citizen-Initiated Referendum Campaigns.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (6):777–93.Google Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, and Donovan, Todd. 2004. “Measuring the Effects of Direct Democracy on State Policy: Not All Initiatives Are Created Equal.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 4 (3):345–63.Google Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, and Donovan, Todd. eds. 2013. The Limits of Electoral Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, Donovan, Todd, and Lawrence, Eric D.. 2005. “Choosing Direct Democracy: On the Creation of Initiative Institutions in the American States.” Paper read at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 31–September 4, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, Donovan, Todd, and Karp, Jeffrey A.. 2002. “When Might Institutions Change? Elite Support for Direct Democracy in Three Nations.” Political Research Quarterly 55 (4):731–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, Henry, Verba, Sidney, and Schlozman, Kay. 1995. “Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation.” American Political Science Review 89 (2):271–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braunstein, Rich. 2004. Initiative and Referendum Voting: Governing through Direct Democracy in the United States. New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing LLCGoogle Scholar
Brehm, John, and Rahn, Wendy. 1997. “Individual-Level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (3):9991023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Jason. 2011. “The Right to a Competent Electorate.” Philosophical Quarterly 61 (245):700–24.Google Scholar
Breuer, Anita. 2011. “Obstacles to Citizen Participation by Direct Democracy in Latin America: A Comparative Regional Analysis of Legal Frameworks and Evidence from the Costa Rican Case.” Democratization 18 (1):100–34.Google Scholar
Brighouse, Harry, and Olin-Wright, Erik. 2006. “A Proposal to Transform the House of Lords into a Citizens’ Assembly.” In www.ssc.wisc.edu/~wright/Published%20writing/Democratizing-House-of-Lords.pdf.Google Scholar
Brinks, Daniel M., and Coppedge, Michael. 2006. “Diffusion Is No Illusion: Neighbor Emulation in the Third Wave of Democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 39 (4):463–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunetti, Aymo. 1997. “Der Status Quo Bias und die bremsende Wirkung des fakultativen Referendums.” In Wieviel direkte Demokratie verträgt die Schweiz?, eds. Borner, S. and Rentsch, H.. Zürich: Verlag Rüegger.Google Scholar
Bryan, Frank M. 2004. Real Democracy: The New England Town Meeting and How It Works. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bühlmann, Marc. 2018. “«Leuchtturm der Hoffnung» oder Erzeugerin «irrationaler Ängst» - Taugt die direkte Demokratie der Schweiz als Vorbild?” In Repräsentative versus direkte Demokratie: Repräsentation in der Krise?, eds. Apelt, A. H. and Reimers, D.. Mitteldeutscher: Verlag.Google Scholar
Bühlmann, Marc, and Freitag, Markus. 2006. “Individual and Contextual Determinants of Electoral Participation.” Swiss Political Science Review 12 (4):1347.Google Scholar
Bullock, John G. 2011. “Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate.” American Political Science Review 105 (3):496515.Google Scholar
Buquet, Daniel. 2007. “Entre la Legitimidad y la Eficacia: Reformas en los Sistemas de Elección Presidencial en América Latina.” Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política 16:3549.Google Scholar
Burden, Barry C. 2005. “Institutions and Policy Representation in the States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 5 (4):373–93.Google Scholar
Butler, David, and Ranney, Austin, eds. 1978. Referendums: A Comparative Study of Practice and Theory. Washington, DC: AEI Press.Google Scholar
Butler, David, and Ranney, Austin, eds. 1994. Referendums around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy. Washington, DC: AEI Press.Google Scholar
Cabalin, Cristian. 2014. “Online and Mobilized Students: The Use of Facebook in the Chilean Student Protests.” Comunicar 43 (XXII):2533.Google Scholar
Cabannes, Yves. 2004. “Participatory Budgeting: A Significant Contribution to Participatory Democracy.” Environment and Urbanization 16 (1):2746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, Bruce, and Miller, Kenneth. 2001. “The Populist Legacy: Initiatives and the Undermining of Representative Government.” In Dangerous Democracy? The Battle over Ballot Initiatives in America, eds. Sabato, L., Larson, B., and Ernst, H.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig. 2015. “Foreword.” In Democratizing Inequalities: Dilemmas of the New Public Participation, eds. Lee, C. W., McQuarrie, M., and Walker, E. T.. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Callahan, Kevin J. 2010. Demonstration Culture: European Socialism and the Second International, 1889–1914. Leicester: Troubador Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto. 2009. “The Competitive Road to Proportional Representation: Partisan Biases and Electoral Regime Change under Increasing Party Competition.” World Politics 61 (2):254–95.Google Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto. 2014. Legislator Success in Fragmented Congresses in Argentina: Plurality Cartels, Minority Presidents, and Lawmaking. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto. 2015. Anatomía política de Twitter en Argentina: Tuiteando #Nisman. Buenos Aires: Capital Intelectual.Google Scholar
Capoccia, Giovanni, and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2010. “The Historical Turn in Democratization Studies: A New Research Agenda for Europe and Beyond.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (8–9):931–68.Google Scholar
Carrubba, Clifford J., and Volden, Craig. 2000. “Coalitional Politics and Logrolling in Legislative Institutions.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (2):261– 77.Google Scholar
Castiglioni, Rossana. 2005. The Politics of Social Policy Change in Chile and Uruguay: Retrenchment versus Maintenance 1973–1998. New York. Routledge.Google Scholar
Catt, Helena. 1999. Democracy in Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cebula, Richard J. 2008. “Does Direct Democracy Increase Voter Turnout? Evidence from the 2004 General Election.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 67 (4):629–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheibub, José Antonio. 2007. Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chemerinsky, Erwin. 2004. “In Defense of Judicial Review: A Reply to Professor Kramer.” California Law Review 92 (4):1013–25.Google Scholar
Childers, Matt, and Binder, Mike. 2012. “Engaged by the Initiative? How the Use of Citizen Initiatives Increases Voter Turnout.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (1):93103.Google Scholar
Christiano, Thomas, ed. 2003. Philosophy and Democracy: An Anthology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Christin, Thomas, Hug, Simon, and Sciarini, Pascal. 2002. “Interests and Information in Referendum Voting: An Analysis of Swiss Voters.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (6):759–76.Google Scholar
Christmann, Anna. 2010. “Why Do Popular Votes on Minority Issues Emerge? The Use of Direct Democratic Institutions in Conflicts on Muslim Buildings in Germany and Switzerland.” Paper read at ECPR Joint Sessions, Muenster.Google Scholar
Christmann, Anna. 2013. “Anti-Minority Votes and Judicial Review.” Acta Politica 48 (4):429–58.Google Scholar
Christmann, Anna, and Danaci, Deniz. 2012. “Direct Democracy and Minority Rights: Direct and Indirect Effects on Religious Minorities in Switzerland.” Politics and Religion 5 (1):133–60.Google Scholar
Chuaqui, Tomás. 2005. “Participación electoral obligatoria y la protección de la libertad personal.” In Voto ciudadano: Debate sobre la inscripción electoral, eds. Fuentes, C. and Villar, A.. Santiago: FLACSO-Chile.Google Scholar
Church, Clive H., and Vatter, Adrian. 2016. “Shadows in the Swiss Paradise.” Journal of Democracy 27 (3):166–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke-Adams, John, and Barile, Paolo. 1953. “The Implementation of the Italian Constitution.” The American Political Science Review 47 (1):6183.Google Scholar
Cleves, Mario, Gould, Wiliam, and Marchenko, Yuli V.. 2016. An Introduction to Survival Analysis Using Stata. Revised third edn College Station, TX: Stata PressGoogle Scholar
Coffé, Hilde, and Michels, Ank. 2014. “Education and Support for Representative, Direct and Stealth Democracy.” Electoral Studies 35:111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. 1989. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State, eds. Hamlin, A. and Pettit, P.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cohen, Leonard, and Robinson, Sharon. 1988. “Everybody Knows.” https://genius.com/Leonard-cohen-everybody-knows-lyrics.Google Scholar
Collier, David, and Messick, Richard E.. 1975. “Prerequisites versus Diffusion: Testing Alternative Explanations of Social Security Adoption.” American Political Science Review 69 (4):1299–315.Google Scholar
Colomer, Joseph M. 2001. Political Institutions: Democracy and Social Choice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cooter, Robert D., and Gilbert, Michael D.. 2010. “Theory of Direct Democracy and the Single Subject Rule.” Columbia Law Review 110 (3):687730.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 1998. “The Dynamic Diversity of Latin American Party Systems.” Party Politics 4 (4):547–68.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 2004. “Quality of Democracy and Its Measurement.” In The Quality of Democracy: Theory and Applications, eds. O’Donnell, G., Cullell, J. V., and Iazzetta, O. M.. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael, Gerring, John, Altman, David, Bernhard, Michael, Fish, Steven, Hicken, Allen, Kroenig, Matthew, Lindberg, Staffan I., McMann, Kelly, Paxton, Pamela, Semetko, Holli A., Skaaning, Svend-Erik, Staton, Jeffrey, and Teorell, Jan. 2011. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: A New Approach.” Perspectives on Politics 9 (2):247–67.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael, Gerring, John, Lindberg, Staffan I., Skaaning, Svend-Erik, Teorell, Jan, Altman, David, Michael, Bernhard, Steven Fish, M., Glynn, Adam, Hicken, Allen, Knutsen, Carl Henrik, Krusell, Joshua, Lührmann, Anna, Marquardt, Kyle L., McMann, Kelly, Mechkova, Valeriya, Olin, Moa, Paxton, Pamela, Pemstein, Daniel, Pernes, Josefine, Petrarca, Constanza Sanhueza, von Römer, Johannes, Saxer, Laura, Seim, Brigitte, Sigman, Rachel, Staton, Jeffrey, Stepanova, Natalia, and Wilson, Steven. 2017a. “V-Dem Dataset v7.” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael, Gerring, John, Lindberg, Staffan I., Skaaning, Svend-Erik, Teorell, Jan, Altman, David, Bernhard, Michael, Steven Fish, M., Glynn, Adam, Hicken, Allen, Henrik Knutsen, Carl, Marquardt, Kyle L., McMann, Kelly, Mechkova, Valeriya, Paxton, Pamela, Pemstein, Daniel, Saxer, Laura, Seim, Brigitte, Sigman, Rachel, and Staton, Jeffrey. 2017b. “V-Dem Codebook v7.” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.Google Scholar
Corak, Miles. 2013. “Income Inequality, Equality of Opportunity, and Intergenerational Mobility.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 27 (3):79102.Google Scholar
Côrte-Real, Paulo P., and Pereira, Paulo T.. 2004. “The Voter Who Wasn’t There: Referenda, Representation and Abstention.” Social Choice and Welfare 22 (2):349–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortés, Juvenal J. 2017. “Arrested Development: The Slow Start to Mexican Direct Democracy.” Estudios Mexicanos 33 (3):394416.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 2007. “Code of Good Practice on Referendums.” Venice Commission. CDL-AD(2007)008 Or.Fr. (N°371).Google Scholar
Crepaz, Markus. 1990. “The Impact of Party Polarization and Postmaterialism on Voter Turnout: A Comparative Study of 16 Industrial Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 18 (2):183205.Google Scholar
Cronin, Thomas E. 1999. Direct Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum and Recall. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin. 2004. Post-Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1987. “Sketches for a Democratic Utopia.” Scandinavian Political Studies 10 (3):195206.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. 2004. Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., Bürklin, Wilhelm, and Drummond, Andrew. 2001. “Public Opinion and Direct Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 12 (4):141–53.Google Scholar
Damore, David F., Bowler, Shaun, and Nicholson, Stephen P.. 2012. “Agenda Setting by Direct Democracy: Comparing the Initiative and the Referendum.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 12 (4):367–93.Google Scholar
Danaci, Deniz. 2012. “The Minaret Ban in Switzerland: An Exception to the Rule?” In Direct Democracy and Minorities, ed. Marxer, W.. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
de Figueiredo, John M. 2005. “How Much Does Money Matter in Direct Democracy?Southern California Law Review 78:1065–73.Google Scholar
Denemark, David. 2001. “Choosing MMP in New Zealand: Explaining the 1993 Electoral Reform.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, eds. Shugart, M. S. and Wattenberg, M. P.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, Matías. 2015. El orden clandestino: Política, fuerzas de seguridad y mercados ilegales en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Rústica.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry, and Morlino, Leonardo. 2004. “The Quality of Democracy: An Overview.” Journal of Democracy 15 (4):2031.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry, and Morlino, Leonardo. 2005. “Introduction.” In Assessing the Quality of Democracy, eds. Diamond, L. and Morlino, L.. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Donovan, Todd. 2014. “Referendums and Initiatives in North America.” In Referendums around the World: The Continued Growth of Direct Democracy, ed. Qvortrup, M.. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Donovan, Todd, and Karp, Jeffrey A.. 2006. “Popular Support for Direct Democracy.” Party Politics 12 (5):671–88.Google Scholar
Donovan, Todd, and Bowler, Shaun. 1998. “Direct Democracy and Minority Rights: An Extension.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (3):1020–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorn, David, Fischer, Justina A. V., Kirchgässner, Gebhard, and Sousa-Poza, Alfonso. 2008. “Direct Democracy and Life Satisfaction Revisited: New Evidence for Switzerland.” Journal of Happiness Studies 9 (2):227–55.Google Scholar
Douez, Sophie. 2011. “Peoples’ Will Sets the Agenda.” swissinfo.ch (April 1).Google Scholar
Doumenge, François. 1985. “The Viability of Small Intertropical Islands.” In States, Microstates, and Islands, eds. Dommen, E. and Hein, P.. Dover, NH: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Dowlen, Oliver. 2009. “Sorting Out Sortition: A Perspective on the Random Selection of Political Officers.” Political Studies 57 (2):298315.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S. 1990. Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S. 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S. 2001. “Legitimacy and Economy in Deliberative Democracy.” Political Theory 29 (5):651–69.Google Scholar
Dunn, John. 1979. Western Political Theory in the Face of the Future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dürst, Hansjörg. 2004. “The Landsgemeinde: The Cantonal Assembly of Glarus (Switzerland). History, Present and Future.” Paper read at IX Congreso Internacional del CLAD sobre la Reforma del Estado y de la Administración Pública, November 2–5, Madrid.Google Scholar
Dvořák, Tomáš, Zouhar, Jan, and Novák, Jakub. 2017. “The Effect of Direct Democracy on Turnout: Voter Mobilization or Participatory Momentum?Political Research Quarterly 70 (2):433–48.Google Scholar
Dyck, Joshua J. 2009. “Initiated Distrust: Direct Democracy and Trust in Government.” American Politics Research 37 (4):539–68.Google Scholar
Dyck, Joshua J. 2010. “Political Distrust and Conservative Voting in Ballot Measure Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 63 (3):612–26.Google Scholar
Dyck, Joshua J. 2012. “Racial Threat, Direct Legislation, and Social Trust: Taking Tyranny Seriously in Studies of the Ballot Initiative.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (3):615–28.Google Scholar
Dyck, Joshua J., and Lascher, Edward L. Jr. 2009. “Direct Democracy and Political Efficacy Reconsidered.” Political Behavior 31 (3):401–27.Google Scholar
Eder, Christin, and Magin, Raphael. 2008. “Direkte Demokratie.” In Die Demokratien der deutschen Bundesländer, eds. Vatter, A. and Freitag, M.. Opladen: Verlag Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar
Eliasoph, Nina. 1998. Avoiding Politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elkink, Johan A. 2011. “The International Diffusion of Democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 44 (12):1651–74.Google Scholar
Elkins, Zachary. 2010. “Diffusion and the Constitutionalization of Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (8–9):969–99.Google Scholar
Elkins, Zachary, Ginsburg, Tom, and Melton, James. 2009. The Endurance of National Constitutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, Richard J. 2002. Democratic Delusions: The Initiative Process in America. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Ellis, Richard J. 2003. “Signature Gathering in the Initiative Process: How Democratic Is It?Montana Law Review 64 (1): Article 4.Google Scholar
Ellis, Richard J. 2016. “Con: Resolved, the United States Should Adopt a National Initiative and Referendum.” In Debating Reform: Conflicting Perspectives on How to Fix the American Political System, eds. Ellis, R. J. and Nelson, M.. Los Angeles: SAGE/CQ.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1998. “Deliberation and Constitution Making.” In Deliberative Democracy, ed. Elster, J.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erdbrink, Thomas. 2015. “Iran Leader Suggests Direct Votes on Issues.” The New York Times. January 4.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., Wright, Gerald C., and McIver, John P.. 1993. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erlanger, Simon. 2006. “The Politics of ‘Transmigration’: Why Jewish Refugees Had to Leave Switzerland from 1944 to 1954.” Jewish Political Studies Review 18 (1–2):7185.Google Scholar
Erlanger, Simon. 2010. “Real, Imaginary, and Symbolic Roles of Jews in Swiss Society.” Jewish Political Studies Review 22 (1–2):5973.Google Scholar
Esaiasson, Peter, Gilljam, Mikael, and Persson, Mikael. 2012. “Which Decision-Making Arrangements Generate the Strongest Legitimacy Beliefs? Evidence from a Randomised Field Experiment.” European Journal of Political Research 51 (6):785808.Google Scholar
Esaiasson, Peter, Persson, Mikael, Gilljam, Mikael, and Lindholm, Torun. Forthcoming. “Reconsidering the Role of Procedures for Decision Acceptance.” British Journal of Political Science.Google Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai. 1996. The New Golden Rule. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Eule, Julian N. 1990. “Judicial Review of Direct Democracy.” The Yale Law Journal 99 (7):1503–90.Google Scholar
Everson, David H. 1981. “The Effects of Initiatives on Voter Turnout: A Comparative State Analysis.” Western Political Quarterly 34 (3):415–25.Google Scholar
Faas, Thorsten. 2015. “Bring the State (Information) In: Campaign Dynamics in the Run-Up to a German Referendum.” Electoral Studies 38:226–37.Google Scholar
Falleti, Tulia G. 2005. “A Sequential Theory of Decentralization: Latin American Cases in Comparative Perspective.” American Political Science Review 99 (3):327–46.Google Scholar
Farrar, Cynthia, Fishkin, James S., Green, Donald P., List, Christian, Luskin, Robert C., and Paluck, Elizabeth Levy. 2010. “Disaggregating Deliberation’s Effects: An Experiment within a Deliberative Poll.” British Journal of Political Science 40 (2):333–47.Google Scholar
Farrar, Cynthia, Green, Donald P., Green, Jennifer E., Nickerson, David W., and Shewfelt, Steven. 2009. “Does Discussion Group Composition Affect Policy Preferences? Results from Three Randomized Experiments.” Political Psychology 30 (4):615–47.Google Scholar
Farrugia, Charles. 1993. “The Special Working Environment of Senior Administrators in Small States.” World Development 21 (2):221–6.Google Scholar
Fatke, Matthias, and Freitag, Markus. 2013. “Direct Democracy: Protest Catalyst or Protest Alternative?Political Behavior 35 (2):237–60.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1991. “Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science.” World Politics 43 (2):169–95.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John. 2008. “Conclusion: the Citizens’ Assembly Model.” In Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly, eds. Warren, M. E. and Pearse, H.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feuer, Lewis S. 1982. Einstein and the Generations of Science. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Fisch, William B. 2006. “Constitutional Referendum in the United States of America.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 54 (Fall):485504.Google Scholar
Fishkin, James S. 1991. Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fishkin, James S. 1997. The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy: New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fishkin, James S. 2006. “The Nation in a Room: Turning Public Opinion into Policy.” Boston Review. March/April: http://bostonreview.net/BR31.2/fishkin.php.Google Scholar
Flauss, Jean-François. 1995. “Introductory Address by Mr Jean-François Flauss.” Constitutional Justice and Democracy by Referendum - Proceedings.Google Scholar
Flavin, Patrick. 2015. “Direct Democracy and Political Equality in the American States.” Social Science Quarterly 96 (1):119–32.Google Scholar
Fossedal, Gregory A. 2002. Direct Democracy in Switzerland. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Fournier, Patrick, van der Kolk, Henk, Kenneth Carty, R., Blais, André, and Rose, Jonathan. 2011. When Citizens Decide: Lessons from Citizen Assemblies on Electoral Reform. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, Mark, van der Eijk, Cees, and Marsh, Michael. 1995. “Referendum Outcomes and Trust in Government: Public Support for Europe in the Wake of Maastricht.” West European Politics 18 (3):101–17.Google Scholar
Franzmann, Simon, and Kaiser, André. 2006. “Locating Political Parties in Policy Space: A Reanalysis of Party Manifesto Data.” Party Politics 12 (2):163–88.Google Scholar
Fredriksen, Kaja Bonesmo. 2012. “Income Inequality in the European Union.” Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Economic Department Working Papers No. 952.Google Scholar
Freitag, Markus, and Ackermann, Kathrin. 2016. “Direct Democracy and Institutional Trust: Relationships and Differences Across Personality Traits.” Political Psychology 37 (5):707–23.Google Scholar
Freitag, Markus, and Stadelmann-Steffen, Isabelle. 2010. “Stumbling Block or Stepping Stone? The Influence of Direct Democracy on Individual Participation in Parliamentary Elections.” Electoral Studies 29 (3):472–83.Google Scholar
Frey, Bruno S., Kucher, Marcel, and Stutzer, Alois. 2001. “Outcome, Process and Power in Direct Democracy: New Econometric Results.” Public Choice 107 (3–4):271–93.Google Scholar
Frey, Bruno S., and Stutzer, Alois. 2000a. “Happiness Prospers in Democracy.” Journal of Happiness Studies 1 (1):79102.Google Scholar
Frey, Bruno S., and Stutzer, Alois. 2000b. “Happiness, Economy and Institutions.” The Economic Journal 110 (466):918–38.Google Scholar
Frey, Bruno S., and Stutzer, Alois. 2000c. “Maximising Happiness?German Economic Review 1 (2):145–67.Google Scholar
Frickey, Philip P. 1998. “The Communion of Strangers: Representative Government, Direct Democracy, and the Privatization of the Public Sphere.” Willamette Law Review 34 (3–4):421–47.Google Scholar
Fung, Archon. 2003. “Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 11 (3):338–67.Google Scholar
Fung, Archon. 2007. “Minipublics: Deliberative Designs and Their Consequences.” In Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern?, ed. Rosenberg, S. W.. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fung, Archon, and Wright, Erik Olin, eds. 2003. Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. London: Verso Press.Google Scholar
Funk, Patricia, and Gathmann, Christina. 2011. “Does Direct Democracy Reduce the Size of Government? New Evidence from Historical Data, 1890–2000.” The Economic Journal 121 (557):1252–80.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Michael. 1996. “Ireland: The Referendum As a Conservative Device?” In The Referendum Experience in Europe, eds. Gallagher, Michael and Uleri, P. V.. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gallego, Aina 2010. “Understanding Unequal Turnout: Education and Voting in Comparative Perspective.” Electoral Studies 29 (2):239–48.Google Scholar
Gamble, Barbara S. 1997. “Putting Civil Rights to a Popular Vote.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (1):245–69.Google Scholar
Garcé, Aldolfo. 2017. “Hacia una teoría ideacional de la difusión institucional. La adopción y adaptación del presidencialismo en América Latina durante el siglo xix.” Revista Española de Ciencia Política 44:1341.Google Scholar
Garrett, Elizabeth. 1997. “Who Directs Direct Democracy?University of Chicago Roundtable 4 (1):1736.Google Scholar
Garrett, Elizabeth, and Gerber, Elisabeth R.. 2001. “Money in the Initiative and Referendum Process: Evidence of Its Effects and Prospects for Reform.” In The Battle Over Citizen Lawmaking, ed. Waters, M. D.. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gastil, John. 2000. “Is Face-to-Face Citizen Deliberation a Luxury or a Necessity?Political Communication 17 (4):357–61.Google Scholar
Gastil, John, and Richards, Robert. 2013. “Making Direct Democracy Deliberative through Random Assemblies.” Politics & Society 41 (2):253–81.Google Scholar
Gastil, John, Richards, Robert, and Knobloch, Katherine. 2014. “Vicarious Deliberation: How the Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review Influenced Deliberation in Mass Elections.” International Journal of Communication 8:6289.Google Scholar
Gerber, Elisabeth R. 1996. “Legislative Response to the Threat of Popular Initiatives.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (1):99128.Google Scholar
Gerber, Elisabeth R. 1999. The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gerber, Elisabeth R., and Lupia, Arthur. 1995. “Campaign Competition and Policy Responsiveness in Direct Legislation Elections.” Political Behaviour 17 (3):287306.Google Scholar
Gerber, Elisabeth R., Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D., and Roderick Kiewiet, D.. 2001. Stealing the Initiative: How State Government Responds to Direct Democracy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
German Social Democratic Party. 1891. The Erfurt Program.Google Scholar
Gerring, John, and Zarecki, Dominic. 2011. “Size and Democracy Revisited.” Central European University. DISC Working Papers No. 17.Google Scholar
Gherghina, Sergiu. 2017. “Direct Democracy and Subjective Regime Legitimacy in Europe.” Democratization 24 (4):613–31.Google Scholar
Gilland-Lutz, Karin, and Hug, Simon, eds. 2010. Financing Referendum Campaigns. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gilljam, Mikael, Esaiasson, Peter, and Lindholm, Torun. 2010. “The Voice of the Pupils: An Experimental Comparison of Decisions Made by Elected Pupil Councils, Pupils in Referenda, and Teaching Staff.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 22 (1):7388.Google Scholar
Giudice, Roberto B., and Conzi, Efrain Gonzalez. 1959. Batlle y el Batllismo. Montevideo: Editorial Medina.Google Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian S., and Ward, Michael D.. 2006. “Diffusion and the International Context of Democratization.” International Organization 60 (4):911–33.Google Scholar
Glencross, Andrew, and Trechsel, Alexander H.. 2007. “First or Second Order Referendums? Understanding the Votes on the Constitutional Treaty in Four EU Member States.” Paper read at International Conference on Direct Democracy in Latin America, March 14–15, Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Goebel, Thomas. 2002. A Government by the People: Direct Democracy in America, 1890–1940. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary. 2005. Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Golbub, Jonathan. 2008. “Survival Analysis.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, eds. Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., Brady, H. E., and Collier, D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldfrank, Benjamin. 2006. “Los Procesos de “Presupuesto Participativo” en América Latina: Exito, Fracaso y Cambio.” Revista de Ciencia Política XXVI (2):328.Google Scholar
Goldfrank, Benjamin. 2011. “Los Consejos Comunales: ¿Avance o Retroceso para la Democracia Venezolana?Iconos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales 40:4155.Google Scholar
Goldfrank, Benjamin. 2012. “The World Bank and the Globalization of Participatory Budgeting.” Journal of Public Deliberation 8 (2): Article 7.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E. 1985. Protecting the Vulnerable: A Reanalysis of Our Social Responsibilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E. 2008. Innovating Democracy: Democratic Theory and Practice after the Deliberative Turn. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Barbara. 1992. Justice by Lottery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goudsmit, Into A., and Blackburn, James. 2001. “Participatory Municipal Planning in Bolivia: An Ambiguous Experience.” Development in Practice 11 (5):587–96.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Edward S. 2015. Capitalism and the American Political Ideal. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Justin, and Thomas, Clive S.. 1998. “Regulating Lobbying in the Western World.” Parliamentary Affairs 51 (4):487–99.Google Scholar
Grindle, Merilee. 2000. Audacious Reforms: Institutional Invention and Democracy in Latin America. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gross, Andreas. 2007. “The Design Determines the Quality: Some Criteria for Determining the Design and the Quality of Direct Democracy.” In Direct Democracy in Europe: Developments and Prospects eds. Pállinger, Z. T., Kaufmann, B., Marxer, W., and Schiller, T.. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Gross, Andreas, and Kaufmann, Bruno. 2002. IRI Europe Country Index on Citizen Lawmaking 2002: A Report on Design and Rating of the I&R Requirements and Practices of 32 European States. Amsterdam: IRI Europe.Google Scholar
Grummel, John A. 2008. “Morality Politics, Direct Democracy, and Turnout.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 8 (3):282–92.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hadenius, Axel. 1992. Democracy and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hagen, Michael G. 2002. “Direct Democracy in Practice: The Initiative as a Legislative Institution?Congress and the Presidency 29 (2):217–23.Google Scholar
Haider-Markel, Donald P, Querze, Alana, and Lindaman, Kara. 2007. “Lose, Win, or Draw? A Reexamination of Direct Democracy and Minority Rights.” Political Research Quarterly 60 (2):304–14.Google Scholar
Hailsham, Lord. 1978. The Dilemma of Democracy: Diagnosis and Prescription. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens, and Hangartner, Dominik. 2013. “Who Gets a Swiss Passport? A Natural Experiment in Immigrant Discrimination.” American Political Science Review 107 (1):159–87.Google Scholar
Hajnal, Zoltan, Gerber, Elisabeth, and Louch, Hugh. 2002. “Minorities and Direct Legislation: Evidence from California Ballot Proposition Elections.” The Journal of Politics 64 (1):154–77.Google Scholar
Hajnal, Zoltan, and Lewis, Paul G.. 2003. “Municipal Institutions and Voter Turnout in Local Elections.” Urban Affairs Review 38 (5):645–68.Google Scholar
Hartnett, Lynne Ann. 2014. The Defiant Life of Vera Figner: Surviving the Russian Revolution. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hartpole, William. 1981. Democracy and Liberty. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund Press.Google Scholar
Haskell, John. 2001. Direct Democracy or Representative Government? Dispelling the Populist Myth. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Hazra, Avijit, and Nithya, Gogtay. 2017. “Biostatistics Series Module 9: Survival Analysis.” Indian Journal of Dermatology 62 (3):251–77.Google Scholar
Held, David. 1996. Models of Democracy. Second edn Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hero, Rodney, and Tolbert, Caroline J.. 2004. “Minority Voices and Citizen Attitudes about Government Responsiveness in the American States: Do Social and Institutional Context Matter?British Journal of Political Science 34 (1):109–21.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J., and Weiler, Jonathan D.. 2009. Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbing, John R., and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. 2002. Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs about How Government Should Work. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hibbing, John R., and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. 2008. “Voice, Validation and Legitimacy.” In Cooperation: The Political Psychology of Effective Human Interaction, eds. Sullivan, B. A., Snyder, M., and Sullivan, J.. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hill, Kim Quaile, and Leighley, Jan E.. 1993. “Party Ideology, Organization, and Competitiveness As Mobilizing Forces in Gubernatorial Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (4):1158–78.Google Scholar
Hill, Lisa. 2000. “Compulsory Voting, Political Shyness and Welfare Outcomes.” Journal of Sociology 36 (1):3049.Google Scholar
Hill, Lisa. 2003. “Democratic Deficit in the ACT: Is the Citizen Initiated Referendum a Solution?Australian Journal of Social Issues 38 (4):495511.Google Scholar
Hill, Lisa. 2006. “Low Voter Turnout in the United States: Is Compulsory Voting a Viable Solution?Journal of Theoretical Politics 18 (2):207 –32.Google Scholar
Hill, Lisa. 2013. “Deliberative Democracy and Compulsory Voting.” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy 12 (4):454–67.Google Scholar
Hizen, Yoichi, and Shinmyo, Masafumi. 2011. “Imposing a Turnout Threshold in Referendums.” Public Choice 148 (3):491503.Google Scholar
Hobolt, Sara B. 2006a. “Direct Democracy and European Integration.” Journal of European Public Policy 13 (1):153–66.Google Scholar
Hobolt, Sara B. 2006b. “How Parties Affect Vote Choice in European Integration Referendums.” Party Politics 12 (5):623–47.Google Scholar
Hobolt, Sara B. 2009. Europe in Question: Referendums on European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hollings, Polly, and Roper, Caroline. 2015. “Referendum on Membership of the European Union: Question Testing.” www.electoralcommission.org.uk/data/assets/pdf_file/0006/192093/GfK-Report-EU-Referendum-Question-Testing-2015-WEB.pdf.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, Bakker, Ryan, Brigevich, Anna, de Vries, Catherine, Edwards, Erica, Marks, Gary, Rovny, Jan, and Steenbergen, Marco. 2010. “Reliability and Validity of Measuring Party Positions: The Chapel Hill Expert Surveys of 2002 and 2006.” European Journal of Political Research 49 (5):684703.Google Scholar
Hug, Simon. 2002. Voices of Europe: Citizens, Referendums and European Integration. Lanham, MD.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hug, Simon. 2004. “Occurrence and Policy Consequences of Referendums: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 16 (3):321–56.Google Scholar
Hug, Simon. 2005. “The Political Effects of Referendums: An Analysis of Institutional Innovations in Eastern and Central Europe.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 38 (4):475–99.Google Scholar
Hug, Simon, and Tsebelis, George. 2002. “Veto Players and Referendums around the World.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 14 (4):465515.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Hwang, Jau Yuan, ed. 2005. Direct Democracy in Asia: A Reference Guide to the Legislation and Practice. Taipei: Taiwan Foundation for Democracy Publication.Google Scholar
Ingham, Sean, and Levin, Ines. 2017. “Effects of Deliberative Minipublics on Public Opinion: Experimental Evidence from a Survey on Social Security Reform.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw030.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1977. The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias Sociales UDP. 2015. Encuesta Nacional UDP, 2005–2015. Santiago de Chile: Universidad Diego Portales.Google Scholar
International IDEA. 2008. Direct Democracy: The International IDEA Handbook. Stockholm: International IDEA.Google Scholar
Isaac, Jeffrey C. 2016. “Is There a Crisis of Democracy? The Rise of Trump-Like Figures in Democracies.” Public Seminar (December 15). https://goo.gl/lG0IfM.Google Scholar
Jackman, Robert W., and Miller, Ross. 1995. “Voter Turnout in the Industrialized Democracies during the 1980s.” Comparative Political Studies 27 (4):467–92.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Arthur J., and Schlink, Bernhard, eds. 2000. Weimar: A Jurisprudence of Crisis. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jacoby, William G. 1997. Statistical Graphics for Univariate and Bivariate Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Jacquet, Vincent. 2017. “Explaining Non-Participation in Deliberative Mini-Publics.” European Journal of Political Research 56 (3):640–59.Google Scholar
Jahn, Detlef. 2014. “What Is Left and Right in Comparative Politics? A Response to Simon Franzmann.” Party Politics 20 (2):297301.Google Scholar
Jessee, Stephen. 2016. “(How) Can We Estimate the Ideology of Citizens and Political Elites on the Same Scale?American Journal of Political Science 60 (4):1108–24.Google Scholar
Johanningmeier, Corey A. 2007. “Law & Politics: The Case against Judicial Review of Direct Democracy.” Indiana Law Journal 82:1125–38.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica 47 (2):263–92.Google Scholar
Karpowitz, Christopher F., and Mendelberg, Tali. 2014. The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Karpowitz, Christopher F., Mendelberg, Tali, and Shaker, Lee. 2012. “Gender Inequality in Deliberative Participation.” American Political Science Review 106 (3):533–47.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Bruno, ed. 2004. Initiative and Referendum Monitor 2004/2005. Amsterdam: IRI Europe.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Bruno, and Waters, Dane, eds. 2004. Direct Democracy in Europe: A Comprehensive Reference Guide to the Initiative and Referendum Process in Europe. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Bruno, Büchi, Rolf, and Braun, Nadja. 2008. Guidebook to Direct Democracy in Switzerland and Beyond. 2008 edn Bern: Benteli Hallwag Druck AG.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Bruno, Büchi, Rolf, and Braun, Nadja. 2010. Guidebook to Direct Democracy in Switzerland and Beyond. 2010 edn Bern: Benteli Hallwag Druck AG.Google Scholar
Kautsky, Karl. 1893. Die direkte Gesetzgebung durch das Volk und der Klassenkampf [The Direct Legislation by the People and the Class Struggle]. www.marxists.org/deutsch/archiv/kautsky/1893/xx/gesetzgebung.htm.Google Scholar
Kazin, Michael. 1995. The Populist Persuasion: An American History. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Keane, John. 2009. The Life and Death of Democracy. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Keller, Jared. 2010. “Evaluating Iran’s Twitter Revolution.” The Atlantic. June 18.Google Scholar
Kern, Anna. 2017. “The Effect of Direct Democratic Participation on Citizens’ Political Attitudes in Switzerland: The Difference between Availability and Use.” Politics and Governance 5 (2):1626.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. 1966. The Responsible Electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Jeong Hyun. 2017. “Direct Democracy and Women’s Political Engagement.” Paper read at 113th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 31–September 3, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
King, David C. 2012. “Congress, Polarization, and Fidelity to the Median Voter.” John F. Kennedy School of Government.Google Scholar
Kirchgässner, Gebhard. 2008. “Direct Democracy: Obstacle to Reform?Constitutional Political Economy 19 (2):8193.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, Freeze, Kent, Kolev, Kiril, and Wang, Yi-Ting. 2009. “Measuring Democratic Accountability: An Initial Report on an Emerging Data Set.” Revista de Ciencia Política 29 (3):741–73.Google Scholar
Kneuer, Marianne. 2016. “E-Democracy: A New Challenge for Measuring Democracy.” International Political Science Review 37 (5):666–78.Google Scholar
Knutsen, Oddbjørn. 1995. “Value Orientations, Political Conflicts and Left-Right Identification: A Comparative Study.” European Journal of Political Research 28 (1):6393.Google Scholar
Kobach, Kris. 1993. The Referendum: Direct Democracy in Switzerland. London: Dartmouth Publishing Company Ltd.Google Scholar
Kollman, Ken. 1997. “Inviting Friends to Lobby: Groups, Ideological Bias, and Congressional Committees.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (2):519–44.Google Scholar
Komáromi, László. 2012. “Representation, Participation and Popular Sovereignty: The Role of Citizens in the Constitution-Making Processes at the Turn of the 18th and 19th Century.” In Las Cortes de Cádiz y la Historia Parlamentaria, ed. García, D. R.. Cádiz: Universidad de Cádiz.Google Scholar
Komáromi, László. 2013. “The Idea of Popular Sovereignty and the Different European Traditions of Direct Democracy.” In European Traditions: Integration or Disintegration?, eds. Oosterhuis, J. and van Dongen, E.. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.Google Scholar
Komáromi, László. 2014. “Parliaments and Popular Law-Making: The German and Estonian Experience in the Interwar Years.” Parliaments, Estates and Representation 34 (1):5575.Google Scholar
Komáromi, László. 2015. “Establishment, Evolution and Interaction of Modern Direct Democratic Traditions.” Giornale di Storia Costituzionale 30 (2):5972.Google Scholar
Kousser, Thad, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. “Social Choice, Crypto-Initiatives and Policy Making by Direct Democracy.” Southern California Law Review 78 (4):949–84.Google Scholar
Kramer, Gerald H. 1971. “Short-Term Fluctuations in US Voting Behavior: 1896–1964.” American Political Science Review 65 (1):131–43.Google Scholar
Kramer, Larry D. 2004. The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kramer, Mark. 2009. “The Dialectics of Empire: Soviet Leaders and the Challenge of Civil Resistance in East-Central Europe, 1968–91.” In Civil Resistance and Power Politics: The Experience of Non-Violent Action from Gandhi to the Present, eds. Roberts, A. and Ash, T. G.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2005. Direct Democratic Choice: The Swiss Experience. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2006. “Role of the Political Elite in Swiss Direct-Democratic Votes.” Party Politics 12 (5):599622.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, and Trechsel, Alexander H.. 2008. The Politics of Switzerland: Continuity and Change in a Consensus Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, and Wisler, Dominique. 1999. “The Impact of Social Movements on Political Institutions: A Comparison of the Introduction of Direct Legislation in Switzerland and the United States.” In How Social Movements Matter, eds. Giugni, M., McAdam, D., and Tilly, C.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Krupavičius, Algis. 2012. “Citizens’ Initiatives in Lithuania: Initiatives, Institutions and Their Political Impact in a New Democracy.” In Citizens’ Initiatives in Europe: Procedures and Consequences of Agenda-Setting by Citizens, eds. Setälä, M. and Schiller, T.. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lacey, Robert J. 2005. “The Electoral Allure of Direct Democracy: The Effect of Initiative Salience on Voting, 1990–1996.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 5 (2):168–81.Google Scholar
Lacy, Dean, and Niou, Emerson M. S.. 2000. “A Problem with Referendums.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 12 (1):531.Google Scholar
Lafont, Cristina. 2015. “Deliberation, Participation, and Democratic Legitimacy: Should Deliberative Mini-Publics Shape Public Policy?Journal of Political Philosophy 23 (1):4063.Google Scholar
Landwehr, Claudia. 2014. “Facilitating Deliberation: The Role of Impartial Intermediaries in Deliberative Mini-Publics.” In Deliberative Mini-Publics: Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process, eds. Grönlund, K., Bächtiger, A., and Setälä, M.. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Lang, Amy. 2007. “But Is It for Real? The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly as a Model of State-Sponsored Citizen Empowerment.” Politics & Society 35 (1):3570.Google Scholar
Lascher, Edward L. Jr., Hagen, Michael G., and Rochlin, Steven A.. 1996. “Gun behind the Door? Ballot Initiatives, State Policies and Public Opinion.” Journal of Politics 58 (3):760–75.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Eric D., Donovan, Todd, and Bowler, Shaun. 2009. “Adopting Direct Democracy: Tests of Competing Explanations of Institutional Change.” American Politics Research 37 (6):1024–47.Google Scholar
Lax, Jeffrey R., and Phillips, Justin H.. 2012. “The Democratic Deficit in the States.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (1):148–66.Google Scholar
LeDuc, Lawrence. 2003. The Politics of Direct Democracy: Referendums in Global Perspective. Peterborough: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Caroline W., McQuarrie, Michael, and Walker, Edward T., eds. 2015. Democratizing Inequalities: Dilemmas of the New Public Participation. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Chung-pin, Chang, Kaiju, and Berry, Frances Stokes. 2011. “Testing the Development and Diffusion of E-Government and E-Democracy: A Global Perspective.” Public Administration Review 71 (3):444–54.Google Scholar
Leemann, Lucas. 2014. “Direct Democracy: Institutional Origins, Initiative Usage, and Policy Consequences.” Columbia University.Google Scholar
Leemann, Lucas, and Wasserfallen, Fabio. 2016. “The Democratic Effect of Direct Democracy.” American Political Science Review 110 (4):113.Google Scholar
Leemann, Lucas, and Mares, Isabela. 2014. “The Adoption of Proportional Representation.” The Journal of Politics 76 (2):461–78.Google Scholar
Leib, Ethan J. 2004. Deliberative Democracy in America: A Proposal for a Popular Branch of Government. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Leimgruber, Philipp, Hangartner, Dominik, and Leemann, Lucas. 2010. “Comparing Candidates and Citizens in the Ideological Space.” Swiss Political Science Review 16 (3):499531.Google Scholar
Leininger, Arndt. 2015a. “Direct Democracy in Europe: Potentials and Pitfalls.” Global Policy 6:1727.Google Scholar
Leininger, Arndt. 2015b. “Popular Support for Direct Democracy in Europe.” Paper read at European Consortium for Political Research Joint Sessions, March 30–April 2, Warsaw.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 1992. “An Introduction to Prospect Theory.” Political Psychology 13 (2):171–86.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 1997. “Prospect Theory, Rational Choice, and International Relations.” International Studies Quarterly 41 (1):87112.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael. 1988. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Daniel C. 2011a. “Bypassing the Representational Filter? Minority Rights Policies under Direct Democracy Institutions in the US States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 11 (2):198222.Google Scholar
Lewis, Daniel C. 2011b. “Direct Democracy and Minority Rights: Same-Sex Marriage Bans in the US States.” Social Science Quarterly 92 (2):364–83.Google Scholar
Lewis, Daniel C. 2013. Direct Democracy and Minority Rights: A Critical Assessment of the Tyranny of the Majority in the American States. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lewis, Daniel C., and Wood, Frederick. 2009. “Direct Democracy, Minority Rights, and Judicial Review.” Paper read at the 67th Annual National Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 2–5, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1997. “Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma.” American Political Science Review 91 (1):114.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 2012. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Linder, Wolf. 1994. Swiss Democracy: Possible Solutions to Conflict in Multicultural Societies. New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Linder, Wolf. 2007. “Direct Democracy.” In Handbook of Swiss Politics, eds. Klöti, U., Knoepfel, P., Kriesi, H., Linder, W., Papadopoulos, Y., and Sciarini, P.. Zurich: Neue Zurcher Zeitung Publishing.Google Scholar
Linder, Wolf. 2010. Swiss Democracy Possible Solutions to Conflict in Multicultural Societies. Third edn London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lowenthal, David. 1987. “Social Features.” In Politics, Security, and Development in Small States, eds. Clarke, C. and Payne, A.. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Luebbert, Gregory M. 1991. Liberalism, Fascism, or Social Democracy: Social Classes and the Political Origins of Regimes in Interwar Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo. 2016. “Descentralización: una aclaración y tres advertencias.” La Diaria 14.11.2016. https://goo.gl/k1UrKr.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur. 1992. “Busy Voters, Agenda Control, and the Power of Information.” American Political Science Review 86 (2):390403.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur. 1994. “The Effect of Information on Voting Behavior and Electoral Outcomes: An Experimental Study of Direct Legislation.” Public Choice 78 (1):6586.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and Matsusaka, John G.. 2004. “Direct Democracy: New Approaches to Old Questions.” Annual Review of Political Science 7 (1):463–82.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Mathew. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Luskin, Robert C., Fishkin, James S., and Jowell, Roger. 2002. “Considered Opinions: Deliberative Polling in Britain.” British Journal of Political Science 32 (3):455–87.Google Scholar
Lutz, Georg. 2006. “The Interaction between Representative and Direct Democracy in Switzerland.” Representation 42 (1):4557.Google Scholar
Madison, James. 1961 [1787]. “No. 10: The Same Subject Continued.” In The Federalist Papers, ed. Rossiter, C.. New York: Mentor.Google Scholar
Madison, James. 1961 [1788]. “No. 49: Method of Guarding against the Encroachments of Any One Department of Government by Appealing to the People through a Convention.” In The Federalist Papers, ed. Rossiter, C.. New York: Mentor.Google Scholar
Madroñal, Juan Carlos. 2005. “Direct Democracy in Latin America: Status of Direct Democracy in Latin America.” Mas Democracia. www.democracy-international.org/fileadmin/di/pdf/papers/dd-latin-america.pdf.Google Scholar
Maerz, Seraphine F. . 2016. “The Electronic Face of Authoritarianism: E-Government As a Tool for Gaining Legitimacy in Competitive and Non-Competitive Regimes.” Government Information Quarterly 33 (4):727–35.Google Scholar
Magleby, David B. 1984. Direct Legislation: Voting on Ballot Propositions in the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Magleby, David B. 1994. “Direct Legislation in the American States.” In Referendums around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy, eds. Butler, D. and Ranney, A.. Washington, DC: AEI Press.Google Scholar
Mair, Peter. 2006. “Ruling the Void? The Hollowing of Western Democracy.” New Left Review 42:2551.Google Scholar
Mair, Peter. 2013. Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Manin, Bernard. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maniquet, Francois, and Morelli, Massimo. 2010. “Approval Quorums Dominate Participation Quorums.” EUI Working Papers. ECO 2010/13.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1983. Beyond Adversarial Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1999. “On the Idea that Participation Makes Better Citizens.” In Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions, eds. Elkin, S. L. and Soltan, K. E.. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Manweller, Matthew. 2005. The People vs. the Courts: Judicial Review and Direct Democracy in the American Legal System. Washington, DC: Academica Press.Google Scholar
Maravall, José María. 1999. “Accountability and Manipulation.” In Democracy, Accountability and Representation, eds. Przeworski, A., Stokes, S., and Manin, B.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marcinkowski, Frank, and Donk, André. 2012. “Winning without Victory? The Media Coverage of Minority Affairs in Swiss Direct Democratic Campaigns.” In Direct Democracy and Minorities, ed. Marxer, W.. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Mares, Isabela. 2015. From Open Secrets to Secret Voting: Democratic Electoral Reforms and Voter Autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marien, Sofie, and Kern, Anna. 2017. “The Winner Takes It All: Revisiting the Effect of Direct Democracy on Citizens’ Political Support.” Political Behavior. (DOI 10.1007/s11109–017–9427–3).Google Scholar
Markoff, John. 1996. Waves of Democracy: Social Movements and Political Change. Thousands Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Markoff, John. 1999. “Where and When Was Democracy Invented?Comparative Studies in Society and History 41 (4):660–90.Google Scholar
Marquardt, Kyle M., and Pemstein, Daniel. 2017. “IRT Models for Expert-Coded Panel Data.” University of Gothenburg, Varieties of Democracy Institute. Working Paper No. 41.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1875. Critique of the Gotha Program. www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1875/gotha/.Google Scholar
Marxer, Wilfried, ed. 2012. Direct Democracy and Minorities. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Mathews, Joe, and Paul, Mark. 2010. California Crackup: How Reform Broke the Golden State and How We Can Fix It. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Matsusaka, John G. 2004. For the Many or the Few: The Initiative, Public Policy, and American Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Matsusaka, John G. 2005a. “Direct Democracy Works.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (2):185206.Google Scholar
Matsusaka, John G. 2005b. “The Eclipse of Legislatures: Direct Democracy in the 21st Century.” Public Choice 124 (1–2):157–77.Google Scholar
Matsusaka, John G. 2010. “Popular Control of Public Policy: A Quantitative Approach.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 5:133–67.Google Scholar
Matsusaka, John G. 2014. “Disentangling the Direct and Indirect Effects of the Initiative Process.” Public Choice 160 (3–4):345–66.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mazzoleni, Oscar. 2007. “The Swiss People’s Party and the Foreign and Security Policy Since the 1990s.” In Europe for the Europeans: The Foreign and Security Policy of the Populist Radical Right, ed. Schori Liang, C.. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
McCormick, John P. 2006. “Contain the Wealthy and Patrol the Magistrates: Restoring Elite Accountability to Popular Government.” American Political Science Review 100 (2):147–63Google Scholar
McDonald, Michael D., and Budge, Ian. 2014. “Getting It (Approximately) Right (and Center and Left!): Reliability and Uncertainty Estimates for the Comparative Manifesto Data.” Electoral Studies 37:6777.Google Scholar
McFaul, Michael. 2002. “The Fourth Wave of Democracy and Dictatorship: Noncooperative Transitions in the Postcommunist World.” World Politics 54 (2):212–44.Google Scholar
McGann, Anthony J. 2006. The Logic of Democracy: Reconciling Equality, Deliberation, and Minority Protection. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
McGrath, Robert J. 2011. “Electoral Competition and the Frequency of Initiative Use in the US States.” American Politics Research 39 (3):611–38.Google Scholar
Melgar, Teresa R. 2015. “The Perilous Paths of Deeper Democracy: Understanding the Rise and Decline of Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegre, Brazil.” Social Science Diliman 11 (2):2455.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, Matthew, and Parkin, Andrew, eds. 2001. Referendum Democracy: Citizens, Elites and Deliberation in Referendum Campaigns. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, Matthew, and Cutler, Fred. 2000. “The Effect of Referenda on Democratic Citizens: Information, Politicization, Efficacy and Tolerance.” British Journal of Political Science 30 (4):669–98.Google Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan. 2005. “Prospect Theory and Political Science.” Annual Political Science Review 8:121.Google Scholar
Merenson, Silvina. 2016. “El voto extraterritorial en Uruguay. Inequidades y asimetrías en una trama política transnacional.” Revista de Investigaciones Politicas y Sociologicas 15 (1):123–42.Google Scholar
Michels, Robert. 1999 (1911). Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Miller, Kenneth P. 2009. Direct Democracy and the Courts. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Nicholas R. 1983. “Pluralism and Social Choice.” American Political Science Review 77 (3):734–47.Google Scholar
Mommsen, Hans. 1996. The Rise and Fall of Weimar Democracy. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Monogan, James, Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. 2009. “Public Opinion, Organized Interests, and Policy Congruence in Initiative and Noninitiative US States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 9 (3):304–24.Google Scholar
Moody, John. 1919. The Railroad Builders a Chronicle of the Welding of the States. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Barrington Jr. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Roger. 1965. The German Social Democrats and the First International 1864–1872. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morlino, Leonardo. 2004. “What is a ‘Good’ Democracy?Democratization 11 (5):1032.Google Scholar
Mounk, Yascha, and Foa, Roberto Stefan. 2016. “Yes, People Really Are Turning Away from Democracy.” The Washington Post. December 8.Google Scholar
Mulgan, Richard G. 1984. “Lot As a Democratic Device of Selection.” The Review of Politics 46 (4):539–60.Google Scholar
Muller, Edward N. 1995. “Economic Determinants of Democracy.” American Sociological Review 60 (6):966–82.Google Scholar
Müller, Sean. 2007. “Federalism vs. Democracy: The Case of Communal Merger in the Canton of Glarus, Switzerland.” Institute of Federalism, University of Fribourg. 2007 Summer University, Preparatory Paper.Google Scholar
Mullinix, Kevin J. 2016. “Partisanship and Preference Formation: Competing Motivations, Elite Polarization, and Issue Importance.” Political Behavior 38 (2):383411.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo L. 2009. Measuring Democracy: A Bridge between Scholarship and Politics. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo L. 2016. “What is Democracy? A Reconceptualization of the Quality of Democracy.” Democratization 23 (1):126.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo L., and Verkuilen, Jay. 2002. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices.” Comparative Political Studies 35 (1):534.Google Scholar
Muñoz, Paula, and Dargent, Eduardo. 2016. “Patronage, Subnational Linkages, and Party-Building: The Cases of Colombia and Peru “ In Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America, eds. Levitsky, S., Loxton, J., Van Dyck, B., and Domínguez, J. I.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Negretto, Gabriel L., and Visconti, Giancarlo. Forthcoming. “Electoral Reform under Limited Party Competition: The Adoption of Proportional Representation in Latin America.” Latin American Politics and Society.Google Scholar
Netchaeva, Irina. 2002. “E-Government and E-Democracy: A Comparison of Opportunities in the North and South.” Gazette 64 (5):467–77.Google Scholar
Newton, Kenneth. 2012. “Curing the Democratic Malaise with Democratic Innovations.” In Evaluation Democratic Innovations: Curing the Democratic Malaise?, eds. Geissel, B. and Newton, K.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nguyen, Duc-Quang. 2016. “Who Are the Two Million Foreigners Living in Switzerland?” swissinfo.ch. February 28.Google Scholar
Niemeyer, Simon. 2011. “The Emancipatory Effect of Deliberation: Empirical Lessons from Mini-Publics.” Politics & Society 39 (1):103–40.Google Scholar
Nippel, Wilfred. 2016. Ancient and Modern Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo. 2010. Democracy, Agency, and the State: Theory with Comparative Intent. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Laughlin, John, Ward, Michael D., Lofdahl, Corey L., Cohen, Jordin S., Brown, David S., Reilly, David, Gleditsch, Kristian S., and Shin, Michael. 1998. “The Diffusion of Democracy, 1946–1994.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 88 (4):545–74.Google Scholar
O’Leary, Kevin. 2006. Saving Democracy: A Plan for Real Representation in America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Olin-Wright, Erik. 2010. Envisioning Real Utopias. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Olken, Benjamin A. 2010. “Direct Democracy and Local Public Goods: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia.” American Political Science Review 104 (2):243–67.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oz, Amos. 1997. “On Social Democracy and the Kibbutz.” Dissent 44 (3):3946.Google Scholar
Palgi, Michal. 2006. “Pitfalls of Self-Management in the Kibbutz.” International Review of Sociology 16 (1):6377.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, Yannis. 2001. “How Does Direct Democracy Matter? The Impact of Referendum Votes upon Politics and Policy-Making.” West European Politics 24 (2):3558.Google Scholar
Pasquino, Pasquale. 2009. “The Debates of the Italian Constituent Assembly concerning the Introduction of a Constitutional Court (1947–1948).” In The Political Origins of Constitutional Courts: Italy, Germany, France, Poland, Canada, United Kingdom, eds. Pasquino, P. and Billi, F.. Rome: Fondazione Adriano Olivetti.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 2012. “Participatory Democracy Revisited.” Perspectives on Politics 10 (1):719.Google Scholar
Paxton, Pamela. 2008. “Gendering Democracy.” In Politics, Gender, and Concepts: Theory and Methodology, eds. Goetz, G. and Mazur, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paxton, Pamela, Hughes, Melanie M., and Green, Jennifer L.. 2006. “The International Women’s Movement and Women’s Political Representation, 1893–2003.” American Sociological Review 71 (6):898920.Google Scholar
Peel, Mark. 1998. “Trusting Disadvantaged Citizens.” In Trust in Governance, eds. Braithwaite, Valerie and Levi, M.. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Peleg, Ilan. 2007. Democratizing the Hegemonic State: Political Transformation in the Age of Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pemstein, Daniel, Marquardt, Kyle L., Tzelgov, Eitan, Wang, Yi-ting, and Miri, Farhad. 2015. “The V-Dem Measurement Model: Latent Variable Analysis for Cross-National and Cross-Temporal Expert-Coded Data.” Varieties of Democracy Institute - University of Gothenburg. Working Paper No. 21.Google Scholar
Penketh, Anne. 2014. “Ethiopian Airlines Hijacking Ends with Co-Pilot’s Arrest in Geneva.” The Guardian. February 17. https://goo.gl/VN2Rcx.Google Scholar
Persson, Mikael, Esaiasson, Peter, and Gilljam, Mikael. 2013. “The Effects of Direct Voting and Deliberation on Legitimacy Beliefs: An Experimental Study of Small Group Decision-Making.” European Political Science Review 5 (3):381–99.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2003. “Deliberative Democracy, the Discursive Dilemma and Republican Theory.” In Philosophy, Politics and Society, eds. Fishkin, J. and Laslett, P.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pharr, Susan J., and Putnam, Robert D., eds. 2000. Disaffected Democracies? What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Justin H. 2008. “Does the Citizen Initiative Weaken Party Government in the US States?State Politics and Policy Quarterly 8 (2):127–49.Google Scholar
Piña, Saul Moises. 2006. “La primera vez que votó la mujer en Sudamérica: El plebiscito de Cerro Chato de 1927.” In Almanaque 2006. Montevideo: Banco de Seguros del Estado.Google Scholar
Piott, Steven L. 2003. Giving Voters a Voice: The Origins of the Initiative and Referendum in America. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Pippen, John, Bowler, Shaun, and Donovan, Todd. 2002. “Election Reform and Direct Democracy: Campaign Finance Regulations in the American States.” American Politics Research 30 (6):559–82.Google Scholar
Polk, Jonathan, Rovny, Jan, Bakker, Ryan, Edwards, Erica, Hooghe, Liesbet, Jolly, Seth, Koedam, Jelle, Kostelka, Filip, Marks, Gary, Schumacher, Gijs, Steenbergen, Marco, Vachudova, Milada, and Zilovic, Marko. 2017. “Explaining the Salience of Anti-Elitism and Reducing Political Corruption for Political Parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey Data.” Research & Politics (January–March):1–9.Google Scholar
Porto, Luisina. 2014. Los Plebiscitos de las Elecciones 2009: Alineamiento y Desalinamiento Ciudadano. Montevideo: Universidad Católica del Uruguay.Google Scholar
Pratchett, Lawrence. 2012. “Local e-Democracy in Five European Countries: Convergence and Divergence in Democratic Development.” In Public Administration in the Information Age: Revisited, eds. Snellen, I., Thaens, M., and de Donk, W. V.. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
Preuhs, Robert R. 2005. “Descriptive Representation, Legislative Leadership, and Direct Democracy: Latino Influence on English Only Laws in the States, 1984–2002.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 5 (3):203–24.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 2010. Democracy and the Limits of Self-Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael E., Cheibub, José Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Quinlan, Stephen, Shephard, Mark, and Paterson, Lindsay. 2015. “Online Discussion and the 2014 Scottish Independence Referendum: Flaming Keyboards or Forums for Deliberation?Electoral Studies 38:192205.Google Scholar
Quintelier, Ellen, and Hooghe, Marc. 2012. “The Impact of Socio-Economic Status on Political Participation.” In Democracy in Transition: Political Participation in the European Union, ed. Demetriou, K. N.. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Qvortrup, Mads. 2001. “The Courts versus the People: An Essay on Judicial Review of Initiatives.” In The Battle over Citizen Lawmaking: A Collection of Essays, ed. Waters, M. D.. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Qvortrup, Mads. 2002. A Comparative Study of Referendums: Government by the People. Second edn Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Qvortrup, Mads. 2014a. “Introduction: Theory, Practice and History.” In Referendums around the World: The Continued Growth of Direct Democracy, ed. Qvortrup, M.. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Qvortrup, Mads. 2014b. Referendums and Ethnic Conflict. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Qvortrup, Mads. ed. 2014c. Referendums around the World: The Continued Growth of Direct Democracy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Radcliff, Benjamin, and Shufeldt, Gregory. 2016. “Direct Democracy and Subjective Well-Being: The Initiative and Life Satisfaction in the American States.” Social Indicators Research 128 (3):1405–23.Google Scholar
Rapp, Carolin, Traunmüller, Richard, Freitag, Markus, and Vatter, Adrian. 2014Moral Politics: The Religious Factor in Referenda Voting.” Politics and Religion 7 (2):418–43.Google Scholar
Rappard, William E. 1912a. “The Initiative and the Referendum in Switzerland.” The American Political Science Review 6 (3):345–66.Google Scholar
Rappard, William E. 1912b. “The Initiative, Referendum and Recall in Switzerland.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 43 (September):110–45.Google Scholar
Reidy, Theresa, and Suiter, Jane. 2015. “Do Rules Matter? Categorizing the Regulation of Referendum Campaigns.” Electoral Studies 38:159–69.Google Scholar
Reif, Karlheinz, and Schmitt, Hermann. 1980. “Nine Second Order National Elections: A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results.” European Journal of Political Research 8 (1):344.Google Scholar
Reilly, Shauna. 2010. Design, Meaning and Choice in Direct Democracy: The Influences of Petitioners and Voters. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rein, Martin. 2006. “Reframing Problematic Policies.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, eds. Moran, M., Rein, M., and Goodin, R. E.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reinisch, Charlotte, and Parkinson, John. 2007. “Swiss Landsgemeinden: A Deliberative Democratic Evaluation of Two Outdoor Parliaments.” Paper read at ECPR Joint Sessions, May 7–12, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Rennó, Lúcio, and Souza, Aílton. 2012. “A Metamorfose do Orçamento Participativo: Mudança de Governo e Seus Efeitos em Porto Alegre.” Revista de Sociologia e Política 20 (41):235–52.Google Scholar
Richards, Jeffrey. 1982. “Politics in Small Independent Communities: Conflict or Consensus?Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 20 (2):155–71.Google Scholar
Riker, William H., and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62 (1):2542.Google Scholar
Rodgers, Daniel T. 1998. Atlantic Crossing: Social Politics in a Progressive Age. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rohner, Gabriela. 2012. Die Wirksamkeit von Volksinitiativen im Bund 1848–2010. Zürich: Schulthess Juristische Medien AG.Google Scholar
Rosner, Menachiem, and Tannenbaum, Arnold S.. 1987. “Organizational Efficiency and Egalitarian Democracy in an Intentional Communal Society: The Kibbutz.” British Journal of Sociology 38 (4):521–45.Google Scholar
Roth, Guenther. 1963. The Social Democrats in Imperial Germany. Totowa: The Bedminster Press.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Bo, and Teorell, Jan. 2008. “What Is Quality of Government? A Theory of Impartial Governmental Institutions.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 21 (2):165–90.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1995 [1762]. The Social Contract and Other Writings. New York: Barnes & Noble Books.Google Scholar
Rubio-Marín, Ruth. 2014. “The Achievement of Female Suffrage in Europe: On Women’s Citizenship.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 12 (1):434.Google Scholar
Ruus, Jüri. 2011. “Democratic Participation at the Local Level in Post-Communist States: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania.” In Local Direct Democracy in Europe, ed. Schiller, T.. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Ryan, Alan. 2012. “Mill and Rousseau: Utility and Rights.” In The Making of Modern Liberalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ryfe, David M. 2005. “Does Deliberative Democracy Work?Annual Review of Political Science 8 (1):4971.Google Scholar
Rytel-Warzocha, Anna. 2012. “Popular Initiatives in Poland: Citizens’ Empowerment or Keeping Up Appearances?” In Citizens’ Initiatives in Europe: Procedures and Consequences of Agenda-Setting by Citizens, eds. Schiller, T. and Setälä, M.. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Saari, Donald, and Sieberg, Katri. 2001. “The Sum of the Parts Can Violate the Whole.” American Political Science Review 95 (2):415–34.Google Scholar
Saiegh, Sebastian M. . 2011. Ruling by Statute: How Uncertainty and Vote Buying Shape Lawmaking. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Samuelson, William, and Zeckhauser, Richard. 1988. “Status Quo Bias in Decision Making.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1 (1):759.Google Scholar
Sanders, Lynn. 1997. “Against Deliberation.” Political Theory 25 (3):347–76.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1987. The Theory of Democracy Revisited. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1997. Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. Second edn New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Sassoon, Donald. 1996. One Hundred Years of Socialism: The West European Left in the Twentieth Century. New York: I.B.Tauris.Google Scholar
Saward, Michael. 1998. The Terms of Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Saward, Michael. ed. 2000. Democratic Innovation: Deliberation, Representation and Association. London: Routledge/ECPR Studies in European Political Science.Google Scholar
Scarrow, Susan E. 1997. “Party Competition and Institutional Change: The Expansion of Direct Democracy in Germany.” Party Politics 3 (4):451–72.Google Scholar
Scarrow, Susan E. 1999. “Parties and the Expansion of Direct Democracy: Who Benefits?Party Politics 5 (3):341–62.Google Scholar
Schaub, Hans-Peter. 2010. “Maximising Direct Democracy – by Popular Assemblies or by Ballot Votes?” Paper read at 3rd European Consortium for Political Research Graduate Conference, August 30–September 1. Dublin City University.Google Scholar
Schaub, Hans-Peter. 2012. “Maximising Direct Democracy – by Popular Assemblies or by Ballot Votes?Swiss Political Science Review 18 (3):305–31.Google Scholar
Schecter, David L. 2009. “Legislating Morality Outside of the Legislature: Direct Democracy, Voter Participation and Morality Politics.” The Social Science Journal 46 (1):89110.Google Scholar
Schildkraut, Deborah J. 2001. “Official-English and the States: Influences on Declaring English the Official Language of the United States.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (2):445–57.Google Scholar
Schiller, Theo. 2011. “Local Direct Democracy in Germany – Varieties in a Federal State.” In Local Direct Democracy in Europe, ed. Schiller, T.. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Schiller, Theo. 2012. “The Emergence of Direct Democracy: A Typological Approach.” In Direct Democracy and Minorities, ed. Marxer, W.: Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Schiller, Theo. 2013. “Origins of Direct Democracy: Conflict, Independence, Democratic Transformation.” Iustum Aequum Salutare 9 (4):1125.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1966. Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. Chicago: Rand McNally and Co.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Daniel, and Yohai, Ian. 2008. “How Initiatives Don’t Always Make Citizens: Ballot Initiatives in the American States, 1978–2004.” Political Behavior 30 (4):469–89Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Verba, Sidney, and Brady, Henry E.. 2012. The Unheavenly Chorus: Political Voice and the Promise of American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Verba, Sidney, and Brady, Henry E.. 2010. “Weapon of the Strong? Participatory Inequality and the Internet.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (2):487509.Google Scholar
Schmidt, David D. 1989. Citizen Lawmakers: The Ballot Initiative Revolution. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Gerald, and Weitsman, Patricia A.. 1996. “The Punishment Trap: Integration Referendums as Popularity Contests.” Comparative Political Studies 28 (4):582607.Google Scholar
Schuck, Andreas R.T., and de Vreese, Claes H.. 2015. “Public Support for Referendums in Europe: A Cross-National Comparison in 21 Countries.” Electoral Studies 38:149–58.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1988. “Freedom of Choice: Concept and Content.” European Economic Review 32 (2–3):269–94.Google Scholar
Serdült, Uwe. 2014. “Switzerland.” In Referendums around the World: The Continued Growth of Direct Democracy, ed. Qvortrup, M.. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Serdült, Uwe, and Welp, Yanina. 2009. “Referendos e iniciativas populares: análisis de ‘la ciudadanía’ que activa la democracia directa.” Paper read at21º IPSA World Congress of Political Science, July 11–16, Santiago de Chile.Google Scholar
Serdült, Uwe, and Welp, Yanina. 2012. “Direct Democracy Upside Down.” Taiwan Journal of Democracy 8 (1):6992.Google Scholar
Serdült, Uwe, and Welp, Yanina. 2015. “How Sustainable Is Democratic Innovation? Tracking Neighborhood Councils in Montevideo.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 7 (2):131–48.Google Scholar
Setälä, Maija. 1999a. Referendums and Democratic Government: Normative Theory and the Analysis of Institutions. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Setälä, Maija. 1999b. “Referendums in Western Europe – A Wave of Direct Democracy?Scandinavian Political Studies 22 (4):327–40.Google Scholar
Setälä, Maija. 2017. “Connecting Deliberative Mini-Publics to Representative Decision Making.” European Journal of Political Research. 56 (4):846-63.Google Scholar
Setälä, Maija, and Herne, Kaisa. 2014. “Normative Theory and Experimental Research in the Study of Deliberative Mini-Publics.” In Deliberative Mini-Publics: Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process, eds. Grönlund, K., Bächtiger, A., and Setälä, M.: Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Setälä, Maija, Grönlund, Kimmo, and Herne, Kaisa. 2010. “Citizen Deliberation on Nuclear Power: A Comparison of Two Decision-Making Methods.” Political Studies 58 (4):688714.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian. 2003. The State of Democratic Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sheppard, Jill. 2015. “Compulsory Voting and Political Knowledge: Testing a ‘Compelled Engagement’ Hypothesis.” Electoral Studies 40:300–7.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 2001. “A Comment on Institutional Change.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 13 (3):321–5.Google Scholar
Shugart, Matthew, and Carey, John. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Siaroff, Alan, and Merer, John W. A.. 2002. “Parliamentary Election Turnout in Europe Since 1990.” Political Studies 50 (5):916–27.Google Scholar
Sides, John, Schickler, Eric, and Citrin, Jack. 2008. “If Everyone Had Voted, Would Bubba and Dubya Have Won?Presidential Studies Quarterly 38 (3):521–39.Google Scholar
Singh, Shane P. 2011. “How Compelling is Compulsory Voting? A Multilevel Analysis of Turnout.” Political Behavior 33 (1):95111.Google Scholar
Singh, Shane P. 2015. “Compulsory Voting and the Turnout Decision Calculus.” Political Studies 63 (3):548–68.Google Scholar
Sintomer, Yves. 2010. “Random Selection, Republican Self-Government, and Deliberative Democracy.” Constellations 17 (3):472–87.Google Scholar
Siune, Karen, Svensson, Palle, and Tonsgaard, Ole. 1994. “The European Union. The Danes Said ‘No’ in 1992 but ‘Yes’ in 1993: How and Why?Electoral Studies 13 (2):107–16.Google Scholar
Slavov, Atanas. 2010. “Direct Democracy in Bulgaria: Its Constitutional, Comparative, and Legislative Aspects.” In Direct Democracy in Bulgaria: Possibilities and Challenges, eds. Slavov, A., Kabakchieva, P., Mikhailov, D., and Hristov, I.. Sofia: Institute for Democracy.Google Scholar
Smith, Daniel A., DeSantis, Matthew, and Kassel, Jason. 2006. “Same-Sex Marriage Ballot Measures and the 2004 Presidential Election.” State and Local Government Review 38 (2):7891.Google Scholar
Smith, Daniel A., and Fridkin, Dustin. 2008. “Delegating Direct Democracy: Interparty Legislative Competition and the Adoption of the Initiative in the American States.” American Political Science Review 102 (3):333–50.Google Scholar
Smith, Daniel A., and Tolbert, Caroline J.. 2004. Educated by Initiative: The Effects of Direct Democracy on Citizens and Political Organizations in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Daniel A., and Tolbert, Caroline J.. 2007. “The Instrumental and Educative Effects of Ballot Measures: Research on Direct Democracy in the American States.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 7 (4):416–45.Google Scholar
Smith, Graham. 2009. Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Mark A. 2001. “The Contingent Effects of Ballot Initiatives and Candidate Races on Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (3):700–6.Google Scholar
Smith, Mark A.. 2002. “Ballot Initiatives and the Democratic Citizen.” The Journal of Politics 64 (3):892903.Google Scholar
Smulovitz, Catalina, and Peruzzotti, Enrique. 2003. “Societal and Horizontal Controls: Two Cases of a Fruitful Relationship.” In Democratic Accountability in Latin America, eds. Mainwaring, S. and Welna, C.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Somer-Topcu, Zeynep. 2015. “Everything to Everyone: The Electoral Consequences of the Broad-Appeal Strategy in Europe.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (4):841–54.Google Scholar
Stadelmann-Steffen, Isabelle, and Vatter, Adrian. 2012. “Does Satisfaction with Democracy Really Increase Happiness? Direct Democracy and Individual Satisfaction in Switzerland.” Political Behavior 34 (3):535–59.Google Scholar
Stadelmann-Steffen, Isabelle, and Dermont, Clau. 2016. “How Exclusive Is Assembly Democracy? Citizens’ Assembly and Ballot Participation Compared.” Swiss Political Science Review 22 (1):95122.Google Scholar
Starr, Harvey. 1991. “Democratic Dominoes: Diffusion Approaches to the Spread of Democracy in the International System.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 35 (2):356–81.Google Scholar
Starr, Harvey, and Lindborg, Christina. 2003. “Democratic Dominoes Revisited: The Hazards of Governmental Transitions, 1974–1996.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 47 (4):490519.Google Scholar
Stearns, Maxwell L. 2012. “Direct (Anti-)Democracy.” The George Washington Law Review 80 (2):311–84.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Jonathan. 1978. Why Switzerland? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steiner, Jürg, Bächtiger, André, Spörndli, Markus, and Steenbergen, Marco. 2004. Deliberative Politics in Action: Analysing Parliamentary Discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 1996. “Economic Reform and Public Opinion in Peru, 1990–1995.” Comparative Political Studies 29 (5):544–65.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 2001. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stolle, Dietland. 1998. “Bowling Together, Bowling Alone: The Development of Generalized Trust in Voluntary Associations.” Political Psychology 19 (3):497526.Google Scholar
Stolle, Dietlind, and Hooghe, Marc. 2004. “Review Article: Inaccurate, Exceptional, One-Sided or Irrelevant? The Debate about the Alleged Decline of Social Capital and Civic Engagement in Western Societies.” British Journal of Political Science 35 (1):149–67.Google Scholar
Strandberg, Kim, Himmelroos, Staffan, and Grönlund, Kimmo. 2017. “Do Discussions in Like-Minded Groups Necessarily Lead to More Extreme Opinions? Deliberative Democracy and Group Polarization.” International Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512117692136.Google Scholar
Stratmann, Thomas. 2005. “The Effectiveness of Money in Ballot Measure Campaigns.” Southern California Law Review 78 (4):1041.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang. 2014. Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, and Schäfer, Armin, eds. 2013. Politics in the Age of Austerity. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Strodtbeck, Fred L., James, Rita M., and Hawkins, Charles. 1957. “Social Status in Jury Deliberations.” American Sociological Review 22 (6):713–19.Google Scholar
Stutzer, Alois. 1999. “Demokratieindizes für die Kantone der Schweiz.” Working Paper No. 23. Institute for Empirical Research in Economics. Zurich.Google Scholar
Suksi, Markku. 1993. Bringing in the People: A Comparison of Constitutional Forms and Practices of the Referendums. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Sullivan, James William. 1892. Direct Legislation by the Citizenship through the Initiative and Referendum. New York: Twentieth Century Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1995. “Incompletely Theorized Agreements.” Harvard Law Review 108 (7):1733–72.Google Scholar
Sussman, Gary. 2012. “When the Demos Shapes the Polis - The Use of Referendums in Settling Sovereignty Issues.” www.iandrinstitute.org/docs/Sussman-When-the-Demos-Shapes-the-Polis-IRI.pdf.Google Scholar
Sutton, Paul. 2007. “Democracy and Good Governance in Small States.” In Commonwealth Small States. Issues and Prospects, eds. Kisanga, E. and Danchie, S. J.. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.Google Scholar
Svensson, Palle. 2002. “Five Danish Referendums on the European Community and European Union: A Critical Assessment of the Franklin Thesis.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (6):733–50.Google Scholar
Svensson, Palle. 2011. “Forms and Terminology of Direct Democracy.” Paper read at International Political Science Association – European Consortium of Political Research Joint Conference, February 16–19, São Paulo.Google Scholar
Szczerbiak, Aleks, and Taggart, Paul A.. 2004. “The Politics of European Referendum Outcomes and Turnout: Two Models.” West European Politics 27 (4):557–83.Google Scholar
Szczerbiak, Aleks, and Taggart, Paul A.. eds. 2005. EU Enlargement and Referendums. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Takazawa, Miyuki. 2016. “How Many Bills Have Been Introduced to and Passed by the Parliament in Japan, US, UK, Germany and France? (in Japanese).” The Reference 791 (12):4976.Google Scholar
Taks, Javier. 2006. “Migraciones internacionales en Uruguay: de pueblo trasplantado a diáspora vinculada.” Theomai 14:139–56.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1993. “Cycles of Collective Action: Between Moments of Madness and the Repertoire of Contention.” Social Science History 17 (2):281307.Google Scholar
Tatalovich, Raymond. 1995. Nativism Reborn? The Official English Language Movement and the American States. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Taylor, Michael, and Herman, Valentine M.. 1971. “Party Systems and Government Stability.” The American Political Science Review 65 (1):2837.Google Scholar
Teorell, Jan. 2006. “Political Participation and Three Theories of Democracy: A Research Inventory and Agenda.” European Journal of Political Research 45 (5):787810.Google Scholar
Teorell, Jan, Ziblatt, Daniel, and Lehoucq, Fabrice. 2016. “An Introduction to Special Issue: The Causes and Consequences of Secret Ballot Reform.” Comparative Political Studies 50 (5):531–54.Google Scholar
The Electoral Commission [UK]. 2009a. Our Approach to Assessing the Intelligibility of Referendum Questions. Available from www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/82625/Referendum-Questions-our-approach.pdf.Google Scholar
The Electoral Commission [UK]. 2009b. Referendum Question Assessment Guidelines. Available from www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/82626/Referendum-Question-guidelines-final.pdf.Google Scholar
The Electoral Commission [UK]. 2015. Referendum on Membership of the European Union: Assessment of the Electoral Commission on the Proposed Referendum Question. www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/192075/EU-referendum-question-assessment-report.pdf.Google Scholar
The World Bank. 2017. World Development Report 2017: Governance and the Law. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Thorisdottir, Hulda, Jost, John T., Liviatan, Ido, and Shrout, Patrick E.. 2007. “Psychological Needs and Values Underlying Left-Right Political Orientation: Cross-National Evidence from Eastern and Western Europe.” Public Opinion Quarterly 71 (2):175203.Google Scholar
Tierney, Stephen. 2012. Constitutional Referendums: The Theory and Practice of Republican Deliberation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tierney, Stephen. 2013. “Using Electoral Law to Construct a Deliberative Referendum: Moving beyond the Democratic Paradox.” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy 12 (4):508–23.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Toka, Gabor. 2008. “Citizen Information, Election Outcomes and Good Governance.” Electoral Studies 27 (1):3144.Google Scholar
Tolbert, Caroline J. 2003. “Direct Democracy and the Institutional Realignment in the American States.” Political Science Quarterly 118 (3):467–89.Google Scholar
Tolbert, Caroline J., and Bowen, Daniel. 2008. “Direct Democracy, Engagement and Turnout.” In Democracy in the States: Experiments in Election Reform, eds. Cain, B. E., Donovan, T., and Tolbert, C.. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Tolbert, Caroline J., Bowen, Daniel C., and Donovan, Todd. 2009. “Initiative Campaigns: Direct Democracy and Voter Mobilization.” American Politics Research 37 (1):155–92.Google Scholar
Tolbert, Caroline J., Grummel, John, and Smith, Daniel. 2001. “The Effects of Ballot Initiatives on Voter Turnout in the American States.” American Politics Review 29 (6):625–48.Google Scholar
Tolbert, Caroline J., and Smith, Daniel A.. 2005. “The Educative Effects of Ballot Initiatives on Voter Turnout.” American Politics Research 33 (2):283309.Google Scholar
Tolbert, Caroline J., and Smith, Daniel A.. 2006. “Representation and Direct Democracy in the United States.” Representation 42 (1):2544.Google Scholar
Tornic, Ana, and Massuger, Nina. 2007. “Patterns of Constitutional Design: The Role of Citizens and Elites in Constitution-Making.” In Patterns of Constitutional Design: The Role of Citizens and Elites in Constitution-Making, eds. Wheatley, J. and Mendez, F.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Towfigh, Emanuel V., Goerg, Sebastian J., Glöckner, Andreas, Leifeld, Philip, Llorente-Saguer, Aniol, Bade, Sophie, and Kurschilgen, Carlos. 2016. “Do Direct-Democratic Procedures Lead to Higher Acceptance than Political Representation? Experimental Survey Evidence from Germany.” Public Choice 167 (1):4765.Google Scholar
Trechsel, Alexander H., and Serdült, Uwe. 1999. Kaledikop Volksrechte: Die Institutionen der direkten Demokratie in den schweizerischen Kantonen 1970–1996. Basel: Helbing und Lichtenhahn.Google Scholar
Tridimas, George. 2007. “Ratification through Referendum or Parliamentary Vote: When to Call a Non-Required Referendum?European Journal of Political Economy 23 (3):674–92.Google Scholar
Tuesta Soldevilla, Fernando, ed. 2014. Una Onda Expansiva: Las Revocatorias en el Perú y América Latina. Lima: Jurado Nacional de Elecciones - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 1999. Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ulbig, Stacy G. 2008. “Voice is Not Enough: The Importance of Influence in Political Trust and Policy Assessments.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (3):523–39.Google Scholar
Uleri, PierVincenzo. 1996. “Italy: Referendums and Initiatives from the Origins to the Crisis of a Democratic Regime.” In The Referendum Experience in Europe, eds. Gallagher, M. and Uleri, P. V.. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Uleri, PierVincenzo. 2002. “On Referendum Voting in Italy: YES, NO or Non–Vote? How Italian Parties Learned to Control Referendums.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (6):863–3.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto Mangabeira. 1998. Democracy Realized: The Progressive Alternative. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Vanhanen, Tatu. 2000. “A New Dataset for Measuring Democracy, 1810–1998.” Journal of Peace Research 37 (2):251–65.Google Scholar
Vanhanen, Tatu. 2003. Democratization: A Comparative Analysis of 170 Countries. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Várnagy, Réka, Ilonszki, Gabriella, and Ondré, Péter. 2012 “Majority Dominance and Minority Behaviour in the Hungarian Parliament.” Paper read at European Consortium for Political Research Joint Sessions, April 10–15, Antwerp.Google Scholar
Vatter, Adrian. 2009. “Lijphart Expanded: Three Dimensions of Democracy in Advanced OECD Countries?European Political Science Review 1 (1):125–53.Google Scholar
Vatter, Adrian. 2016a. Das politische System der Schweiz. Second edn Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Vatter, Adrian. 2016b. “Switzerland on the Road from a Consociational to a Centrifugal Democracy?Swiss Political Science Review 22 (1):5974.Google Scholar
Vatter, Adrian, and Stadelmann-Steffen, Isabelle. 2012. “Does Satisfaction with Democracy Really Increase Happiness? Direct Democracy and Individual Satisfaction in Switzerland.” Political Behavior 34:535–59.Google Scholar
Vatter, Adrian, and Stadelmann-Steffen, Isabelle. 2013. “Subnational Patterns of Democracy in Austria, Germany and Switzerland.” West European Politics 36 (1):7196.Google Scholar
Veenendaal, Wouter P. 2015a. “Democracy in Microstates: Why Smallness Does Not Produce a Democratic Political System.” Democratization 22 (1):92112.Google Scholar
Veenendaal, Wouter P. 2015b. Politics and Democracy in Microstates. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Veenendaal, Wouter P., and Corbett, Jack. 2015. “Why Small States Offer Important Answers to Large Questions.” Comparative Political Studies 48 (4):527–49.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, and Nie, Norman. 1972. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.Google Scholar
Verhulst, Jos, and Nijeboer, Arejen. 2007. Direct Democracy: Facts and Arguments about the Introduction of Initiative and Referendum. Brussels: Democracy International.Google Scholar
Vis, Barbara, and van Kersbergen, Kees. 2007. “Why and How Do Political Actors Pursue Risky Reforms?Journal of Theoretical Politics 19 (2):153–72.Google Scholar
Voeten, Erik. 2016. “No, People Really Aren’t Turning Away from Democracy.” The Washington Post. December 9.Google Scholar
Voigt, Stefan, and Blume, Lorenz. 2015. “Does Direct Democracy Make for Better Citizens? A Cautionary Warning Based on Cross-Country Evidence.” Constitutional Political Economy 26 (4):391420.Google Scholar
Wagschal, Uwe. 1997. “Direct Democracy and Public Policymaking.” Journal of Public Policy 17 (2):223–45.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 2006. “The Core of the Case against Judicial Review.” The Yale Law Journal 115:1346–406.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack L. 1969. “The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States.” American Political Science Review 63 (3):880–99.Google Scholar
Walker, Mark Clarence. 2003. The Strategic Use of Referendum: Power, Legitimacy and Democracy. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Warner-Neal, Fred. 1958. Titoism in Action: The Reforms in Yugoslavia after 1948. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Warren, Mark E. 2009. “Two Trust Based Uses of Minipublics in Democracy.” Paper read at American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, September 3–6, Toronto.Google Scholar
Warren, Mark E., and Pearse, Hilary, eds. 2008. Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Werner, Hannah, and Marien, Sofie. 2016. “Why Citizen Involvement Is a Story of Apples and Oranges: Studying Individual Differences in the Effect of Citizen Involvement and Outcome Favorability on Fairness Perceptions.” Paper read at European Consortium for Political Research General Conference, September 7–10, Prague.Google Scholar
West, Franklin C. 1985. A Crisis of the Weimar Republic: A Study of the German Referendum of 20 June 1926. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 1998. “The Politics of Corruption in Latin America.” Journal of Democracy 9 (2):108–21.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2002a. The Politics of Market Reform in Fragile Democracies: Argentina, Brazil, Peru, and Venezuela. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2002b. “Strengths and Limitations of Rational-Choice Institutionalism in the Study of Latin American Politics.” Studies in Comprative International Development 37 (1):5785.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2014. Making Waves: Democratic Contention in Europe and Latin America Since the Revolutions of 1848. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Steven Lloyd. 2017. “Information and Revolution: The Effect of the Internet upon Authoritarian Regime Transition.”Varieties of Democracy Working Paper 50.Google Scholar
York, Erin, and Cornwell, Benjamin. 2006. “Status on Trial: Social Characteristics and Influence in the Jury Room.” Social Forces 85 (1):455–77.Google Scholar
York, Erin, and Hans, Valerie P.. 2011. “Representation through Participation: A Multilevel Analysis of Jury Deliberations.” Law & Society Review 45 (3):667–98.Google Scholar
Young, Iris M. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zakaras, Alex. 2010. “Lot and Democratic Representation: A Modest Proposal.” Constellations 17 (3):455–71.Google Scholar
Zhuo, Xiaolin, Wellman, Barry, and Yu, Justine. 2011. “Egypt: The First Internet Revolt?Peace Magazine 27 (3):6.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Joseph F. 1999. The New England Town Meeting: Democracy in Action. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Michael. 1968. “The Social Context of Democracy in Massachusetts.” The William and Mary Quarterly 25 (4):523–44.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Michael. 1970. Peaceable Kingdoms: New England Towns in the Eighteenth Century. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • David Altman, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
  • Book: Citizenship and Contemporary Direct Democracy
  • Online publication: 21 December 2018
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • David Altman, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
  • Book: Citizenship and Contemporary Direct Democracy
  • Online publication: 21 December 2018
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • David Altman, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
  • Book: Citizenship and Contemporary Direct Democracy
  • Online publication: 21 December 2018
Available formats
×