Brett, J., Staniszewska, S. & Mockford, C. (2010) The PIRICOM Study: A Systematic Review of the Conceptualisation, Measurement, Impact and Outcomes of Patient and Public Involvement in Health and Social Care Research. United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration.Google Scholar

Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S. et al. (2008) Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. MRC.Google Scholar

Data Protection Act (1998) TSO.Google Scholar

Department of Health (2005a) Mental Capacity Act: Code of Practice. TSO.Google Scholar

Department of Health (2005b) Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care (2nd ed). COI.Google Scholar

Department of Health, Research and Development Directorate England (2011) Governance Arrangements for Research Ethics Committees: A Harmonised Edition. HMSO.Google Scholar

Gifford, F. (2007) Pulling the plug on clinical equipoise: A critique of Miller and Weijer. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 17(3), 203–26.Google Scholar

Gilbert, T. (2004) Involving people with learning disabilities in research: Issues and possibilities. Health and Social Care in Community, 12(4), 298–308.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, L. & Skirton, H. (2015). Research involving people with a learning disability – Methodological challenges and ethical considerations. Journal of Research in Nursing, 20(6), 435–46.Google Scholar

MHRA (2018) Guidance for the Notification of Serious Breaches of GCP or the Trial Protocol. Available at: www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/404588/GCP_serious_breaches_guide.pdf [accessed 22 December 2016].Google Scholar

Green, G. (2016) Power to the people: To what extent has public involvement in applied health research achieved this? Research Involvement and Engagement, 2, 28.Google Scholar

Guyatt, G. (1992) Evidence-based medicine: A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA, 268(17), 2420–5.Google Scholar

Hassiotis, A. (2009) Research in mental health learning disabilities: Present challenges and future drivers. Psychiatry, 11, 457–60.Google Scholar

Hassiotis, A., Scior, K. & Hamid, A. (2015) Engaging service users in identifying priorities for research on intellectual disabilities. University College London. Available at: www.ucl.ac.uk/ciddr/documents/FinalReport21Jan2015.pdf [accessed 19 September 2018].Google Scholar

Hassiotis, A, Strydom, A., Crawford, M. et al. (2014) Clinical and cost effectiveness of staff training in Positive Behaviour Support (PBS) for treating challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disability: A cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry, 14, 219.Google Scholar

Health Research Authority (2016a) Before you apply for approval. Available at: www.hra.nhs.uk/research-community/before-you-apply/determine-which-review-body-approvals-are-required [accessed 19 September 2018].Google Scholar

Health Research Authority (2016b) Questions and answers – Mental Capacity Act 2005. Available at: www.hra.nhs.uk/resources/research-legislation-and-governance/questions-and-answers-mental-capacity-act-2005 [accessed 22 December 2016].Google Scholar

Health Research Authority (2017) Standard operating procedures for research ethics committees. Available at: www.hra.nhs.uk/documents/7/standard-operating-procedures-version-7-2.pdf [accessed 22 March 2018].Google Scholar

Heslop, P., Blair, P., Fleming, P. et al (2013) Confidential Inquiry into Premature Deaths of People with Learning Disabilities (CIPOLD): Final Report. Bristol University. Available at: www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/cipold/migrated/documents/fullfinalreport.pdf [accessed 30 November 2016].Google Scholar

Holland, T. (2009) ‘Editorial’. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53(1), 1–2.Google Scholar

Human Tissue Act (2004) TSO.Google Scholar

Iacono, T. (2006) Ethical challenges and complexities of including people with intellectual disability as participants in research. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 31, 173–9.Google Scholar

INVOLVE (2012) Briefing notes for researchers: Involving the public in NHS, public health and social care research. Eastleigh.Google Scholar

INVOLVE (2015) Public involvement in research: Values and principles framework. Eastleigh.Google Scholar

Kiernan, C. (1999) Participation in research by people with learning disability: Origins and issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 43–7.Google Scholar

McCully, S. (2011) The UK Clinical Trials Regulations: An Introduction to the Regulations and Guidelines that Govern Clinical Trials in the UK. Compliance Healthcheck Consulting UK. Available at: www.chcuk.co.uk/pdf/2011-09-01_UK_Clinical_Trials_Regulations-(Stuart_McCully)_Low_Res.pdf [accessed 21 December 2016].Google Scholar

McVilly, K. R. & Dalton, A. J. (2006) Commentary on Iacono (2006): Ethical challenges and complexities of including people with intellectual disability as participants in research. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 31, 186–8.Google Scholar

MENCAP (2007) Death by Indifference. Available at: www.mencap.org.uk/sites/default/files/2016–06/DBIreport.pdf [accessed 22 December 2016].Google Scholar

National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1979) Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research: The Belmont Report. Office of the Secretary, DHEW.Google Scholar

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2015) Challenging Behaviour and Learning Disabilities: Prevention and Interventions for People with Learning Disabilities Whose Behaviour Challenges (NG11).Google Scholar

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2016) Mental Health Problems in People with Learning Disabilities: Prevention, Assessment and Management (NG54).Google Scholar

National Institute for Health Research [no date] Why research matters. Available at: www.nihr.ac.uk/patients-and-public/why-join-in/why-research-matters.htm [accessed 22 December 2016].Google Scholar

National Institute for Health Research (2016) Health Technology Assessment Programme: Improving communication for adults with profound and multiple learning disabilities (HTA no. 16/156). Available at: www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/172460/16_156cb.pdf [accessed 22 December 2016].Google Scholar

National Research Association (2013) Does my project require review by a research ethics committee? Available at: www.hra.nhs.uk/documents/2013/09/does-my-project-require-rec-review.pdf [accessed 22 December 2016].Google Scholar

NHS Research Authority (2018) Standard Operating Procedures for Research Ethics Committees. UK Health Departments Research Ethics Service, vers. 7.3, September 2016. Available at: file:///C:/Users/owner/Downloads/RES_Standard_Operating_Procedures_Version_7.3_September_2018.pdf [accessed 20 September 2018].Google Scholar

Nicholson, L., Colyer, M. & Cooper, S. A. (2013) Recruitment to intellectual disability research: A qualitative study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57(7), 647–56.Google Scholar

Nind, M. (2008) Conducting qualitative research with people with learning, communication and other disabilities: Methodological challenges. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper. Available at: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/491 [accessed 22 December 2016].Google Scholar

Oliver, P. C., Piachaud, J., Done, J. et al. (2002) Difficulties in conducting a randomized controlled trial of health service interventions in intellectual disability: Implications for evidence-based practice. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46, 340–5.Google Scholar

Oliver-Africano, P., Dickens, S., Ahmed, Z. et al. (2010) Overcoming the barriers experienced in conducting a medication trial in adults with aggressive challenging behaviour and intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54, 17–25.Google Scholar

Regulation (EU) 536/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on clinical trials on medicinal products for human use, and repealing Directive 2001/20/EC.Google Scholar

Robotham, D. & Hassiotis, A. (2009) Randomised controlled trials in learning disabilities: A review of participant experiences. Advances in Mental Health and Learning Disabilities, 3(1), 42–6.Google Scholar

Robotham, D., King, M. & Canagasabey, A. (2011) Social validity of randomised controlled trials in health services research and intellectual disabilities: A qualitative exploration of stakeholder view. Trials, 12, 144.Google Scholar

Robotham, D., Satkunanathan, S., Doughty, L. et al. (2016) Do we still have a digital divide in mental health? A five-year survey follow-up. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(11), e309.Google Scholar

Rothman, D. & Rothman, S. (1984) The Willowbrook Wars. HarperCollins, 265–6.Google Scholar

Sheehan, R., Hassiotis, A., Walters, K. et al. (2015) Mental illness, challenging behaviour, and psychotropic drug prescribing in people with intellectual disability: UK population based cohort study. British Medical Journal, 351, h4326.Google Scholar

Shepherd, V. (2016) Research involving adults lacking capacity to consent: The impact of research regulation on ‘evidence biased’ medicine. BMC Medical Ethics, 7(1), 55. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0138-9Google Scholar

Staley, K. (2009) Exploring Impact: Public Involvement in NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research. Eastleigh.Google Scholar

Strydom, A. (2013) The London Down Syndrome Consortium (LonDownS): An Integrated Study of Cognition and Risk for Alzheimer’s Disease in Down Syndrome. Available at: www.hra.nhs.uk/news/research-summaries/londowns-cohort/#sthash.PsNOEF54.dpuf [accessed 29 December 2016].Google Scholar

Symons, F. J. & Roberts, J. (2013) Biomarkers, behavior, and intellectual and developmental disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 118, 413–15. doi:10.1352/1944-7558-118.6.413Google Scholar

Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, Volume II (1949) pp. 181–2. US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Tyrer, P. (2007) Oral presentation of the NACHBID study at the academic programme of the Department of Mental Health Sciences, UCL, Bloomsbury Campus (10 October 2007).Google Scholar

Tyrer, P., Cooper, S.-A. & Hassiotis, A. (2014) Drug treatments in people with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour. British Medical Journal, 349: g4323.Google Scholar

Tyrer, P., Oliver-Africano, P., Ahmed, Z. et al. (2008) Risperidone, haloperidol, and placebo in the treatment of aggressive challenging behaviour in patients with intellectual disability: A randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 371(9606), 57–63. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60072-0Google Scholar

Tyrer, P., Oliver-Africano, P., Romeo, R. et al. (2009) Neuroleptics in the treatment of aggressive challenging behaviour for people with intellectual disabilities: A randomised controlled trial (NACHBID). Health Technology Assessment, 13(21), iii–iv, ix–xi, 1–54.Google Scholar

Walmsley, J. (2001) Normalisation, emancipatory research and inclusive research in learning disability. Disability & Society, 16(2), 187–205.Google Scholar

Willner, P., Rose, J., Jahoda, A. et al. (2013) Group-based cognitive-behavioural anger management for people with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities: Cluster randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 203, 288–96.Google Scholar

Wilson, P., Cowe, M. & Mathie, E. (2013) Research with Patient and Public Involvement: A Realist Evaluation. Available at: www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/1.2-Wilson.pdf [accessed 22 March 2018].Google Scholar

Wolfe, K., Strydom, A. & Morrogh, D. (2016) Chromosomal microarray testing in adults with intellectual disability presenting with comorbid psychiatric disorders. European Journal of Human Genetics, 25, 66–72.Google Scholar

World Medical Association (2008) Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects.Google Scholar

CTIMPs: EU legislation: www.hra.nhs.uk/resources/before-you-apply/types-of-study/clinical-trials-of-investigational-medicinal-products/clinical-trials-investigational-medicinal-products-ctimps-eu-legislation/#sthash.liQ59aYM.dpufGoogle Scholar

Freeman, C. & Tyrer, P. (eds.) Research Methods in Psychiatry (3rd edn). RCPsych Publications, 2006.Google Scholar

HRA: www.hra.nhs.ukGoogle Scholar

Good clinical practice for clinical trials: www.gov.uk/guidance/good-clinical-practice-for-clinical-trialsGoogle Scholar

National Institute for Health Research: www.nihr.ac.uk/Pages/default.aspxGoogle Scholar

Recommendations for research, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NG54 Mental health problems in people with learning disabilities: prevention, assessment and management: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng54/chapter/Recommendations-for-researchGoogle Scholar

Recommendations for research, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Challenging Behaviour and Learning Disabilities: Prevention and Interventions for People with Learning Disabilities Whose Behaviour Challenges (NG11): www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng11/chapter/2-Research-recommendationsGoogle Scholar

Research with Patient and Public Involvement: A Realist Evaluation. The RAPPORT study. Health Services and Delivery Research 3, 38: http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/hsdr03380Google Scholar

Research funding information, for example about new calls and deadline for applications can usually be obtained from the NIHR official site and from the sites of other bodies such as the MRC and the Wellcome Trust. We recommend establishing clinical–academic partnerships as early as possible if interested in research as both recruitment and methodological know-how are of importance. Other options include involvement with the work of Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (www.clahrcprojects.co.uk) and academically ambitious trainees can seek further information about getting into academic training at www.nihr.ac.uk/funding-and-support/funding-for-training-and-career-development/training-programmes/integrated-academic-training-programme/integrated-academic-training/academic-clinical-fellowshipsGoogle Scholar