Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T06:49:12.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2019

Brian C. Rathbun
Brian C. Rathbun
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Reasoning of State
Realists, Romantics and Rationality in International Relations
 , pp. 310 - 330
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Adelman, Ken. 2014. Reagan at Reykjavik: Forty-Eight Hours That Ended the Cold War. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Anderson, Martin. 1990. Revolution: The Reagan Legacy. Stanford, CA: Hoover Press.Google Scholar
Bismarck, Otto Fürst von. 1966. The Memoirs, Being the Reflections and Reminiscences of Otto, Prince von Bismarck, Written and Dictated by Himself after His Retirement from Office. Vols. 1–2. New York: Fertig.Google Scholar
Churchill, Winston. 1948. The Gathering Storm. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Halifax, Edward Frederick Lindley Wood. 1957. Fullness of Days. New York: Dodd, Mead.Google Scholar
Jansenius, . 1637. Alexandri Patricii Armacani: theologi Mars gallicus sev De ivstitia armorum et foederum regis Galliæ libri duo. [Anonymous pamphlet.]Google Scholar
Reagan, Ronald. 1968. The Creative Society. New York: Devin-Adair Publishing.Google Scholar
Reagan, Ronald. 1990. An American Life: The Autobiography. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Richelieu, Armand Jean Du Plessis, Cardinal de, . 1618. Les principaux points de la foi d l’église catholique, deffendus contre l’escrit addressé au Roy par les quatre ministers de Charenton. Paris.Google Scholar
Richelieu, Armand Jean Du Plessis, Cardinal de, . 1651. Traité qui contient la méthode la plus facile et la plus asseurée pour convertir ceux qui se sont separez de l’église. Paris.Google Scholar
Richelieu, Armand Jean Du Plessis, Cardinal de, . 1907–1931. Mémoires du Cardinal de Richelieu, edited by Société de l’Histoire de France. Paris. (Referred to as Mémoires.)Google Scholar
Richelieu, Armand Jean Du Plessis, Cardinal de, . 1961. The Political Testament of Cardinal Richelieu. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press (referred to as TP).Google Scholar
Shultz, George P. 1993. Turmoil and Triumph: My Years as Secretary of State. New York: Scribner’s.Google Scholar
Weinberger, Caspar W. 1990. Fighting for Peace. Leeds: University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Abshire, David M., and Neustadt, Richard E.. 2005. Saving the Reagan Presidency: Trust Is the Coin of the Realm. College Station, Texas: A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Achen, Christopher H., and Snidal, Duncan. 1989. “Rational Deterrence Theory and Comparative Case Studies.” World Politics 41(2): 143–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Addison, Paul. 1980. “The Political Beliefs of Winston Churchill.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, Fifth Series 30: 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Addison, Paul. 2007. Winston Churchill. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alkon, Paul K. 2006. Winston Churchill’s Imagination. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A., and Genco, Stephen J.. 1977. “Clouds, Clocks, and the Study of Politics.” World Politics 29(4): 489–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anker, Elisabeth. 2005. “Villains, Victims and Heroes: Melodrama, Media and September 11.” Journal of Communication 55(1): 22–37.Google Scholar
Appel, Willi, and Daniel, Ralph T.. 1961. The Harvard Brief Dictionary of Music. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
Arad, Ayala, and Rubinstein, Ariel. 2012. “The 11–20 Money Request Game: A Level-k Reasoning Study.” American Economic Review 102(7): 3561–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkes, Hal R., and Ayton, Peter. 1999. “The Sunk Cost and Concorde Effects: Are Humans Less Rational than Lower Animals?” Psychological Bulletin 125(5): 591–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnett, Jeffery. 1991. “Winston Churchill, the Quintessential Sensation Seeker.” Political Psychology 12(4): 609–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, Robert M. 2006. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ball, Stuart. 2001. “Churchill and the Conservative Party.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, Sixth Series 11: 307–30.Google Scholar
Ball, Stuart. 2003. Winston Churchill. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Bargh, John A., and Chartrand, Tanya L.. 1999. “The Unbearable Automaticity of Being.” American Psychologist 54(7): 462–79.Google Scholar
Baron, Jonathan. 1982. Thinking and Deciding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baron, Jonathan. 1985. Rationality and Intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, D. M. 2006. “Proportion Dominance: The Generality and Variability of Favouring Relative Savings Over Absolute Savings.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 100: 76–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barzun, Jacques. 1944. Romanticism and the Modern Ego. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
Baumeister, Roy F. C., DeWall, Nathan, and Zhang, Liqing. 2007. “Do Emotions Improve or Hinder the Decision Making Process.” In Do Emotions Help or Hurt Decisionmaking?: A Hedgefoxian Perspective, ed. Vohs, Kathleen D., Baumeister, Roy F., and Loewenstein, George New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 11–31.Google Scholar
Baxter, Colin F. 1983. “Winston Churchill: Military Strategist?” Military Affairs 47(1): 7–10.Google Scholar
Bazerman, Max H., Tenbrunsel, Ann E., and Wade-Benzoni, Kimberly. 1998. “Negotiating with Yourself and Losing: Making Decisions with Competing Internal Preferences.” Academy of Management Review 23(2): 225–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechara, Antoine, Damasio, Hanna, Damasio, Antonio R., and Lee, Gregory P.. 1999. “Different Contributions of the Human Amygdala and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex to Decision-Making.” Journal of Neuroscience 19(13): 5473–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bechara, Antoine, Hanna, Damasio, Daniel Tranel, , and Damasio, Antonio R.. 1997. “Deciding Advantageously before Knowing the Advantageous Strategy.” Science 275(5304): 1293–5.Google Scholar
Bechara, Antoine, Hanna, Damasio, Daniel Tranel, , and Damasio, Antonio R.. 2005. “The Iowa Gambling Task and the Somatic Marker Hypothesis: Some Questions and Answers.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9(4): 159–62.Google Scholar
Beersma, B., and De Dreu, Carsten K. W.. 1999. “Negotiation Processes and Outcomes in Prosocially and Egoistically Motivated Groups.” International Journal of Conflict Management 10(4): 385–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. September 1, 1949. “Mr. Churchill.” The Atlantic. www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1949/09/mr-churchill/303546/Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 2014. Political Ideas in the Romantic Age: Their Rise and Influence on Modern Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berzonsky, M. D., and Sullivan, C.. 1992. “Social-Cognitive Aspects of Identity Style: Need for Cognition, Experiential Openness, and Introspection.” Journal of Adolescent Research 7: 140–55.Google Scholar
Best, Geoffrey. 2001. Churchill: A Study in Greatness. London: Hambeldon and London.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek. 1994. Language and Human Behavior. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Birkenhead, Frederick Winston Furneaux Smith. 1966. Halifax: The Life of Lord Halifax. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Blanchard, Jean-Vincent. 2011. Eminence: Cardinal Richelieu and the Rise of France. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Bligh, Michelle C., Kohles, Jeffrey C., and Meindl, James R.. 2004. “Charisma under Crisis: Presidential Leadership, Rhetoric, and Media Responses before and after the September 11th Terrorist Attacks.” Leadership Quarterly 15(2): 211–39.Google Scholar
Booth, Ken, and Wheeler, Nicholas J.. 2008. The Security Dilemma: Fear, Cooperation and Trust in World Politics. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Brands, H. W. 2015. Reagan: The Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Brooks, Stephen G., and Wohlforth, William C.. 2000. “Power, Globalization, and the End of the Cold War: Reevaluating a Landmark Case for Ideas.” International Security 25(3): 5–53.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce. 2014. Principles of International Politics. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage/Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Byman, Daniel L., and Pollack, Kenneth M.. 2001. “Let Us Now Praise Great Men: Bringing the Statesman Back In.” International Security 25(4): 107–46.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, John T., and Petty, Richard E.. 1982. “The Need for Cognition.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42(1): 16–131.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, John T., Petty, Richard E., Feinstein, Jeffrey A., Blair, W., and Jarvis, G.. 1996. “Dispositional Differences in Cognitive Motivation: The Life and Times of Individuals Varying in Need for Cognition.” Psychological Bulletin 119(2): 197–253.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, John T., Petty, Richard E., and Morris, Katherine J.. 1983. “Effects of Need for Cognition on Message Evaluation, Recall, and Persuasion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45(4): 805–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon, Lou. 1991. President Reagan: The Role of a Lifetime. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Carr, Edward Hallett. 1946. The Twenty Years’ Crisis. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Carlton, David.1964. The Twenty Years’ Crisis. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Carlton, David. 1993. “Churchill in 1940: Myth and Reality.” World Affairs 156(2): 97–103.Google Scholar
Carlton, David. 2001. “Churchill and the Two ‘Evil Empires.’” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, Sixth Series 11: 331–51.Google Scholar
Carter, Violet Bonham. 1965. Winston Churchill: An Intimate Portrait. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Catherwood, Christopher. 2009. Winston Churchill: The Flawed Genius of WWII. New York: Berkley.Google Scholar
Chaiken, Shelly. 1980. “Heuristic versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source versus Message Cues in Persuasion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39(5): 752–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charmley, John. 1989. Chamberlain and the Lost Peace. Chicago: Ivan Dee.Google Scholar
Charmley, John. 1991. “Essay and Reflection: Churchill as War Hero.” International History Review 13(1): 96–104.Google Scholar
Charmley, John. 1993. Churchill: The End of Glory. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Subimal, Heath, Timothy B., Milberg, Sandra J., and France, Karen R.. 2000. “The Differential Processing of Price in Gains and Losses: The Effects of Frame and Need for Cognition.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 13(1): 61–75.Google Scholar
Chong, Dennis. 2013. “Degrees of Rationality in Politics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, ed. Huddy, Leonie, Sears, David O. and Levy, Jack S., Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 96–129.Google Scholar
Church, William F. 1972. Richelieu and Reason of State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Colville, John R. 1996. “The Personality of Winston Churchill.” In Crosby Kemper, R. III, ed., Winston Churchill: Resolution, Defiance, Magnanimity, Good Will. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, pp. 108ff.Google Scholar
Costello, John. 1991. Ten Days That Saved the West. London: Bantam Press.Google Scholar
D’Agostino, Paul R., and Fincher-Kiefer, Rebecca. 1992. “Need for Cognition and the Correspondence Bias.” Social Cognition 10(2): 151–3.Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio. 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar
De Callières, Francois. 2000. On the Manner of Negotiating with Princes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
De Dreu, Carsten K. W., Beersma, Bianca, Stroebe, Katherine, and Euwema, Martin C.. 2006. “Motivated Information Processing, Strategic Choice, and the Quality of Negotiated Agreement.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90(6): 927–43.Google Scholar
De Dreu, Carsten K. W., and Boles, Terry L.. 1998. “Share and Share Alike or Winner Take All?: The Influence of Social Value Orientation upon Choice and Recall of Negotiation Heuristics.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76(3): 253–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Dreu, Carsten K. W., and Carnevale, Peter J.. 2003. “Motivational Bases of Information Processing and Strategy in Conflict and Negotiation.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 35: 235–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De la Croix, Horst and Tansey, Richard G.. 1986. Gardner’s Art through the Ages. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Dessler, David. 1989. “What’s at Stake in the Agent–Structure Debate?” International Organization 43(3): 441–73.Google Scholar
Diggins, John P. 2007. Ronald Reagan: Fate, Freedom, and the Making of History. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Dijksterhuis, Ap, Bos, Maarten W., Nordgren, Loran F., and Van Baaren, Rick B.. 2006. “On Making the Right Choice: The Deliberation-without-Attention Effect.” Science 311(5763): 1005–7.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 2000. Realism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorra, Henri. 1972. Art in Perspective. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
D’Souza, Dinesh. 1999. Ronald Reagan: How an Ordinary Man Became an Extraordinary Leader. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Eade, Charles, ed. 1954. Churchill, by His Contemporaries. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Einhorn, Hillel J., and Hogarth, Robin M.. 1981. “Behavioral Decision Theory: Processes of Judgment and choice.” Journal of Accounting Research 19(1): 1–31.Google Scholar
Elliott, John H. 1991. Richelieu and Olivares. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1979. Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. (ed.). 1986. Rational Choice. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1989. Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1999. Alchemies of the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 2009. Reason and Rationality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Seymour, Pacini, Rosemary, Denes-Raj, Veronika, and Heier, Harriet. 1996. “Individual Differences in Intuitive-Experiential and Analytical-Rational Thinking Styles.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71(2): 390–405.Google Scholar
Erlanger, Philippe. 1968. Richelieu: The Thrust for Power. New York: Stein and Day.Google Scholar
Evans, Jonathan S. B. 1984. “Heuristic and Analytic Processes in Reasoning.” British Journal of Psychology 75(4): 451–68.Google Scholar
Evans, Jonathan S. B. 2008. “Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment and Social Cognition.” Annual Review of Psychology 59: 255–79.Google Scholar
Evans, Jonathan, and Over, David E.. 2013 [1996]. Rationality and Reasoning. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Farnham, Barbara. 2001. “Reagan and the Gorbachev Revolution: Perceiving the End of Threat.” Political Science Quarterly 116(2): 225–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1994. “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes.” American Political Science Review 88(3): 577–92.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1995. “Rationalist Explanations for War.” International Organization 49(3): 379–414.Google Scholar
Fearon, James, and Wendt, Alexander. 2002. “Rationalism vs. Constructivism: A Skeptical View.” In Handbook of International Relations, ed. Carlnaes, Walter, Risse-Kappen, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth. London: Sage, pp. 52–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feiling, Keith Grahame. 1946. The Life of Neville Chamberlain. London: Macmillan & Co.Google Scholar
Fettweis, Christopher J. 2013. The Pathologies of Power: Fear, Honor, Glory, and Hubris in US Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feuchtwanger, E. J. 2002. Bismarck. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 2004. The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs about the Use 0f Force. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Finucane, Melissa L., Alhakami, Ali, Slovic, Paul, and Johnson, Stephen M.. 2000. “The Affect Heuristic in Judgments of Risks and Benefits.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 13(1): 1–17.Google Scholar
Fischer, Beth A. 1997. The Reagan Reversal: Foreign Policy and the End of the Cold War. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Fischhoff, Baruch, Slovic, Paul, and Lichtenstein, Sarah. 1977. “Knowing with Certainty: The Appropriateness of Extreme Confidence.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3(4): 552–64.Google Scholar
Fischhoff, Baruch, Slovic, Paul, Lichtenstein, Sarah, Read, Stephen, and Combs, Barbara. 1978. “How Safe Is Safe Enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes towards Technological Risks and Benefits.” Policy Sciences 9(2): 127–52.Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T., and Taylor, Shelley E.. 1984. Social Cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Frances. 2001. Way out There in the Blue: Reagan, Star Wars and the End of the Cold War. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Frank, Elisabeth, and Brandstätter, Veronika. 2002. “Approach versus Avoidance: Different Types of Commitment in Intimate Relationships.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82(2): 208–21.Google Scholar
Frye, Northrop. 1947. Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gall, Lothar. 1986. Bismarck: The White Revolutionary. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Garrison, Justin D. 2013. “An Empire of Ideals”: The Chimeric Imagination of Ronald Reagan. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Garthoff, Raymond. 2000. The Great Transition: American–Soviet Relations and the End of the Cold War. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Gawronski, Bertram, and Bodenhausen, Galen V.. 2006. “Associative and Propositional Processes in Evaluation: An Integrative Review of Implicit and Explicit Attitude Change.” Psychological Bulletin 132(5): 692–731.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L. 1969. “The ‘Operational Code’: A Neglected Approach to the Study of Political Leaders and Decision-Making.” International Studies Quarterly 13(2): 190–222.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd. 2007. Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd, and Goldstein, Daniel G.. 1996. “Reasoning the Fast and Frugal Way: Models of Bounded Rationality.” Psychological Review 103(4): 650–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, Martin. 1977. Winston Churchill: Prophet of Truth, 1922–1939. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Glad, Betty. 1983. “Black-and-White Thinking: Ronald Reagan’s Approach to Foreign Policy.” Political Psychology 4(3): 33–76.Google Scholar
Glaser, Charles L. 1994. “Realists as Optimists: Cooperation as Self-Help.” International Security 19(3): 50–90.Google Scholar
Glaser, Charles L. 2010. Rational Theory of International Politics: The Logic of Competition and Cooperation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, Stacie E. 2009. “When Right Makes Might: How Prussia Overturned the European Balance of Power.” International Security, 33(3): 110–42.Google Scholar
Goddard, Stacie E., and Nexon, Daniel H.. 2005. “Paradigm Lost? Reassessing Theory of International Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 11(1): 9–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hein, Goemans. 2000. War and Punishment: The Causes of War Termination and the First World War Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gollwitzer, Peter M., and Kinney, Ronald F.. 1989. “Effects of Deliberative and Implemental Mind-Sets on Illusion of Control.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56(4): 531–42.Google Scholar
Green, Donald, and Shapiro, Ian. 1996. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua D., Sommerville, R. Brian, Nystrom, Leigh E., Darley, John M., and Cohen, Jonathan D.. 2001. “An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment.” Science 293(5537): 2105–8.Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua D., Nystrom, Leigh E., Engell, Andrew D., Darley, John M., and Cohen, Jonathan D.. 2004. “The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment.” Neuron 44(2): 389–400.Google Scholar
Greenstein, Fred I. 2000. “Reckoning with Reagan: A Review Essay on Edmund Morris’s Dutch.” Political Science Quarterly 115(1): 115–22.Google Scholar
Grieco, Joseph M. 1988. “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism.” International Organization 42(3): 485–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmer, Justin. 2010. Representational Style: The Central Role of Communication in Representation. Dissertation (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University).Google Scholar
Gross, James J. 1998. “The Emerging Field of Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review.” Review of General Psychology 2(3): 271–99.Google Scholar
Haas, M. L. 2005. The Ideological Origins of Great Power Politics, 1789–1989. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Todd A. In press. “On Provocation: Outrage, International Relations, and the Franco-Prussian War.” Security Studies.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Eric, and Rathbun, Brian C.. 2013. “Scarce Differences: Towards a Material and Systemic Foundation for Offensive and Defensive Realism.” Security Studies 22(3): 436–35.Google Scholar
Hanson, Stephen. 2010. Post-Imperial Democracies: Ideology and Party Formation in Third Republic France, Weimar Germany, and Post-Soviet Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, Roderick P. 2009. Campaign Talk: Why Elections Are Good for Us. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, Roderick P. 2014. Communication and Language Analysis in the Public Sphere. Hershey: Information Science Reference.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, Jonathan. 2002. No Virtue Like Necessity: Realist Thought in International Relations since Machiavelli. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hermann, Margaret G., Preston, Thomas, Korany, Baghat, and Shaw, Timothy M.. 2001. “Who Leads Matters: The Effects of Powerful Individuals.” International Studies Review 3(2): 83–131.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Richard K., Tetlock, Philip E., and Visser, Penny S.. 1999. “Mass Public Decisions to Go to War: A Cognitive–Interactionist Framework.” American Political Science Review 93(3): 553–73.Google Scholar
Hitler, Adolf. 1983. Hitler’s Secret Book. New York: Grove/Atlantic.Google Scholar
Holborn, Hajo. 1960. “Bismarck’s Realpolitik.” Journal of the History of Ideas 21(10): 84–98.Google Scholar
Holmes, Marcus. 2013. “The Force of Face-to-Face Diplomacy: Mirror Neurons and the Problem of Intentions.” International Organization 67(4): 829–61.Google Scholar
Holmes, Marcus. 2015. “Believing This and Alieving That: Theorizing Affect and Intuitions in International Politics.” International Studies Quarterly 59(4): 706–20.Google Scholar
Holmes, Marcus. 2018. Face-to-Face Diplomacy: Social Neuroscience and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, Marcus, and Traven, David. 2015. “Acting Rationally without Really Thinking: The Logic of Rational Intuitionism for International Relations Theory.” International Studies Review 17(3): 414–40.Google Scholar
Holsti, Ole R. 1962. “The Belief System and National Images: A Case Study.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 6(3)244–252.Google Scholar
Holsti, Ole R., and Rosenau, James N.. 1988. “The Domestic and Foreign Policy Beliefs of American Leaders.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 32(2): 248–94.Google Scholar
Hsee, Christopher K., and Rottenstreich, Yuval. 2004. “Music, Pandas, and Muggers: On the Affective Psychology of Value.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133(1): 23–30.Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, Sears, David O., and Levy, Jack S.. 2013. “Introduction: Theoretical Foundations of Political Psychology. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, ed. Huddy, Leonie, Sears, David O., and Levy, Jack S.. 2d ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Hymans, Jacques E. C. 2006. The Psychology of Nuclear Proliferation: Identity, Emotions and Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick T. 2008. “Foregrounding Ontology: Dualism, Monism and IR Theory.” Review of International Studies 31(1): 129–53.Google Scholar
James, Robert Rhodes. 1970. Churchill: A Study in Failure. New York: World Publishing. Co.Google Scholar
Janson, Horst Woldemar. 1991. History of Art. New York: Abrams.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1970. The Logic of Images in International Relations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1978. “Cooperation under the Security Dilemma.” World Politics 30(2): 167–214.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1994. “Hans Morgenthau, Realism and the Scientific Study of International Politics.” Social Research 61(4): 853–76.Google Scholar
Johnson, Dominic, and Tierney, Dominic. 2011. “The Rubicon Theory of War.” International Security 36(1): 7–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, Philip Nicholas. 1983. Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jolls, Christine, Sunstein, Cass R., and Thaler, Richard. 1998. “A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics.” Stanford Law Review 1471–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Reginald. 1996. “Churchill as I Knew Him.” In Winston Churchill: Resolution, Defiance, Magnanimity, Good Will, ed. Crosby Kemper, R. III. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Jordan, Richard, Maliniak, Daniel, Oakes, Amy, Peterson, Susan, and Tierney, Michael J.. 2009. One Discipline or Many? TRIP Survey of International Relations Faculty in Ten Countries. Williamsburg, VA: College of William and Mary. http://irtheoryandpractice.wm.edu/projects/trip/Google Scholar
Jost, John T., Glaser, Jack, Kruglanski, Arie W., and Sulloway, Frank J.. 2003. “Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition.” Psychological Bulletin 129(3): 339.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Kahnemann, Daniel, Slovic, Paul, and Tversky, Amos. 1982. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky, A. 1972. “Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness.” Cognitive Psychology 3(3): 430–54.Google Scholar
Kalberg, Stephen. 1980. “Max Weber’s Types of Rationality: Cornerstones for the Analysis of Rationalization Processes in History.” American Journal of Sociology 1145–79.Google Scholar
Keegan, John. 2002. Winston Churchill. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H., and Stahelski, A. J. 1970. “Social Interaction Basis of Cooperators’ and Competitors’ Beliefs about Others.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 16(1): 66–91.Google Scholar
Kemper, R. Crosby. 1996. “The Rhetoric of Civilization.” In Winston Churchill: Resolution, Defiance, Magnanimity, Good Will, ed. Crosby Kemper, R. III. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kertzer, Joshua. 2016. Resolve in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kertzer, Joshua D., Powers, Kathleen E., Rathbun, Brian C., and Iyer, Ravi. 2014. “Moral Support: How Moral Values Shape Foreign Policy Attitudes.” Journal of Politics 63(3): 825–40.Google Scholar
Kertzer, Joshua D., and Rathbun, Brian C.. 2015. “Fair Is Fair: Social Preferences, Bargaining and Reciprocity and International Politics.” World Politics 67(4): 613–55.Google Scholar
Khong, Yuen Foong. 1992. Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry. 1994. Diplomacy. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Klaczynski, Paul A., and Lavallee, Kristen L.. 2005. “Domain-Specific Identity, Epistemic Regulation, and Intellectual Ability as Predictors of Belief-Biased Reasoning: A Dual-Process Perspective.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 92(1): 1–24.Google Scholar
Knecht, Robert Jean. 2014. Richelieu. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Koch, Andrew M. 1993. “Rationality, Romanticism and the Individual: Max Weber’s ‘Modernism’ and the Confrontation with ‘Modernity.’” Canadian Journal of Political Science 1: 123–44.Google Scholar
Kokis, Judite V., Macpherson, Robyn, Toplak, Maggie E., West, Richard F., and Stanovich, Keith E.. 2002. “Heuristic and Analytic Processing: Age Trends and Associations with Cognitive Ability and Cognitive Styles.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 83(1): 26–52.Google Scholar
Koopman, Cheryl, Snyder, Jack, and Jervis, Robert. 1990. “Theory-Driven versus Data Driven Assessment in a Crisis,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 34(4): 694–722.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles, and Snidal, Duncan. 2001. “The Rational Design of International Institutions.” International Organization 55(4): 761–99.Google Scholar
Krebs, Ronald. 2015. Narrative and the Making of US National Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krebs, Ronald R., and Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. 2007. “Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric.” European Journal of International Relations 13(1): 35–66.Google Scholar
Kruglanski, Arie W., and Webster, Donna M.. 1996. “Motivated Closing of the Mind: ‘Seizing’ and ‘Freezing.’” Psychological Review 103(2): 263–83.Google Scholar
Ku, Kelly Y. L., and Ho, Irene T.. 2010. “Dispositional Factors Predicting Chinese Students’ Critical Thinking Performance.” Personality and Individual Differences 48(1): 54–8.Google Scholar
Kuhlman, D. Michael, and Marshello, Alfred F.. 1975. “Individual Differences in Game Motivation as Moderators of Preprogrammed Strategy Effects in Prisoner’s Dilemma.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32(5): 922–31.Google Scholar
Kuhlman, D. Michael, and Wimberley, David L.. 1976. “Expectations of Choice Behavior Held by Cooperators, Competitors, and Individualists across Four Classes of Experimental Games.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34(1): 69–81.Google Scholar
Kydd, Andrew H. 2005. Trust and Mistrust in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Laibson, David. 1997. “Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(2): 443–77.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 1999. Entangling Relations: American Foreign Policy in its Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A. 2009. “TRIPs across the Atlantic: Theory and Epistemology in IPE.” Review of International Political Economy 16(1): 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A. 2011. “Why ‘Isms’ Are Evil: Theory, Epistemology and Academic Sects as Impediments to Understanding and Progress.” International Studies Quarterly 55(2): 465–80.Google Scholar
Lake, David A., and Powell, Robert. 1999. Strategic Choice and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, Robert E. 2003. “Rescuing Political Science from Itself.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, ed. Sears, David O., Huddy, Leonie, and Jervis, Robert. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 755–793.Google Scholar
Langer, Ellen J. 1975. “The Illusion of Control.” Journal of Personality And Social Psychology 32(2): 311–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, Deborah W. 2000. Anatomy of Mistrust: US–Soviet Relations during the Cold War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Larson, Deborah W. 2011. “The Origins of Commitment: Truman and West Berlin.” Journal of Cold War Studies 13(1): 180–212.Google Scholar
Layne, Christopher. 2008. “Security Studies and the Use of History: Neville Chamberlain’s Grand Strategy Revisited.” Security Studies 17: 397–437.Google Scholar
Leary, Mark R., Shepperd, James A., McNeil, Michael S., Jenkins, T. Brant, and Barnes, Byron D.. 1986. “Objectivism in Information Utilization: Theory and Measurement.” Journal of Personality Assessment 50(1): 32–43.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned. 1981. Between Peace and War. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned. 2008. Cultural Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned, and Stein, Janice Gross. 1989. “Rational Deterrence Theory: I Think, Therefore I Deter.” World Politics 41(2): 208–24.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned, and Risse-Kappen, Thomas (eds.). 1995. International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, Jennifer S., and Tetlock, Philip E.. 1999. “Accounting for the Effects of Accountability.” Psychological Bulletin 125(2): 255–75.Google Scholar
Levi, Anthony. 2000. Cardinal Richelieu and the Making of France. New York: Carroll and Graf.Google Scholar
Levine, Daniel J., and Barder, Alexander D.. 2014. “The Closing of the American Mind: ‘American School’ International Relations and the State of Grand Theory.” European Journal of International Relations 20(4): 863–88.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 2013. “Psychology and Foreign Policy Decision-Making. In Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, ed. Huddy, Leonie, Sears, Davoid O., and Levy, Jack S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 301–33.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur. 1924. “On the Discrimination of Romanticisms.” Proceedings of the Modern Language Association 39(2): 229–53.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur. 1941. “The Meaning of Romanticism for the Historian of Ideas.” Journal of the History of Ideas 2(3): 257–78.Google Scholar
Luce, Mary Frances, Bettman, James R., and Payne, John W.. 1997. “Choice Processing in Emotionally Difficult Decisions.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23(2): 384–405.Google Scholar
Ludwig, Emil. 2013. Bismarck: Story of a Fighter. New York: Skyhorse Publications.Google Scholar
Lukacs, John. 2001. Five Days in London, May 1940. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lumsdaine, David Halloran. 1993. Moral Vision in International Politics: The Foreign Aid Regime, 1949–1989. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D., and Popkin, Samuel L.. 2000. Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, Paul K. 2003. “Useful Fiction or Miracle Maker: The Competing Epistemological Foundations of Rational Choice Theory.” American Political Science Review 97(4): 551–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manchester, William. 1988. The Last Lion, Vol 2: Alone, 1932–1940. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Manchester, William, and Reid, Paul. 2012. The Last Lion, Vol. 3: Defender of the Realm, 1940–1965. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Mann, James. 2009. The Rebellion of Ronald Reagan: A History of the End of the Cold War. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Marlo, Francis H. 2016. “The Historiography of the End of the Cold War.” In The Grand Strategy That Won the Cold War, ed. Streusand, Douglas E., Bailey, Norman A., and Marlo, Francis H.. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp. 3–10.Google Scholar
Matlock, Jack F. 2004. Reagan and Gorbachev: How the Cold War Ended. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Mayseless, Ofra, and Kruglanski, Arie W.. 1987. “What Makes You So Sure? Effects of Epistemic Motivations on Judgmental Confidence.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 39(2): 162–83.Google Scholar
McClintock, C. G. 1972. “Social Motivation: A Set of Hypotheses.” Behavioral Science 17(5): 438–54.Google Scholar
McClintock, C. G., and Liebrand, W. B.. 1988. “Role of Interdependence Structure, Individual Value Orientation, and Another’s Strategy in Social Decision Making: A Transformational Analysis.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55(3): 396–409.Google Scholar
McCubbins, Matthew D., and Turner, Mark. 2012. “Going Cognitive: Tools for Rebuilding the Social Sciences.” In Grounding Social Sciences in Cognitive Sciences, ed. Sun, Ron. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 387–414.Google Scholar
McDaniels, Timothy L., Axelrod, Lawrence J., Cavanagh, Nigel S., and Slovic, Paul. 1997. “Perception of Ecological Risk to Water Environments.” Risk Analysis 17(3): 341–52.Google Scholar
McDermott, Rose. 1998. Risk-Taking in International Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
McDermott, Rose. 2004. “The Feeling of Rationality: The Meaning of Neuroscience for Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics 2(4): 691–706.Google Scholar
McDonough, Frank. 1998. Neville Chamberlain, Appeasement and the British Road to War. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
McElroy, Todd, and Seta, John J.. 2003. “Framing Effects: An Analytic–Holistic Perspective.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 39(6): 610–17.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. 1994. “The False Promise of International Institutions.” International Security 19(3): 5–49.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. 2005. “Hans Morgenthau and the Iraq War: Realism versus Neo-Conservatism.” opendemocracy.com.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J., and Walt, Stephen M.. 2013. “Leaving Theory Behind: Why Simplistic Hypothesis Testing Is Bad for International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 19(3): 427–57.Google Scholar
Meinecke, Friederich. 1957. Machiavellianism: The Doctrine of Raison D’État and Its Place in Modern History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan. 1996. Reputation and International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan. 2005. “Rationality and Psychology in International Politics.” International Organization 59(1): 77–106.Google Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan. 2010. “Emotional Beliefs.” International Organization 64(1): 1–31.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, Janet, and Mischel, Walter. 1999. “A Hot/Cool-System Analysis of Delay of Gratification: Dynamics of Willpower.” Psychological Review 106(1): 3–19.Google Scholar
Middlemas, Keith. 1972. The Diplomacy of Illusion: The British Government and Germany, 1937–1939. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V. 1998. “Rationalizing Politics: The Emerging Synthesis of International, American, and Comparative Politics.” International Organization 52(4): 759–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitzen, Jennifer, and Schweller, Randall. 2011. “Knowing the Unknown Unknowns: Misplaced Certainty and the Onset of War.” Security Studies 20(1): 2–35.Google Scholar
Monteiro, Nuno P., and Ruby, Keren G.. 2009. “IR and the False Promise of Philosophical Foundations.” International Theory 1(1): 15–48.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1946. Scientific Man vs. Power Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1948. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: A. A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Murray, A. J. H. 1996. “The Moral Politics of Hans Morgenthau.” Review of Politics 58(1): 81–107.Google Scholar
Newstead, Stephen E., Handley, Simon J., Harley, Clare, Wright, Helen, and Farrelly, Daniel. 2004. “Individual Differences in Deductive Reasoning.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 57(1): 33–60.Google Scholar
Nisbett, Richard E., and Lee, Ross. 1980. Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Oberdorfer, Don. 1991. The Turn: From the Cold War to a New Era: The United States and the Soviet Union, 1983–1990. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Onea, Tudor. 2016. “Immoderate Greatness: Is Great Power Restraint a Practical Grand Strategy.” European Journal of International Security 2(1): 111–32.Google Scholar
Orcibal, Jean. 1948. “Richelieu, homme d’église, homme d’état: À propos d’un ouvrage récent.” Revue d’histoire de l’Église de France 34(124): 94–101.Google Scholar
Oye, Kenneth A. 1985. “Explaining Cooperation under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies.” World Politics 38(1): 1–24.Google Scholar
Pacini, Rosemary, and Epstein, Seymour. 1999. “The Relation of Rational and Experiential Information Processing Styles to Personality, Basic Beliefs, and the Ratio-Bias Phenomenon.” Journal of Personality And Social Psychology 76(6): 972–87.Google Scholar
Pagès, G. 1937. “Autour du ‘grand orage’: Richelieu et marillac, deux politiques.” Revue historique: 63–97.Google Scholar
Parent, Joseph M., and Baron, Joshua M.. 2011. “Elder Abuse: How the Moderns Mistreat Classical Realism.” International Studies Review 13(2): 193–213.Google Scholar
Parker, Andrew M., and Fischhoff, Baruch. 2005. “Decision‐Making Competence: External Validation through an Individual‐Differences Approach.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 18(1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, R. A. C. 1993. Chamberlain and Appeasement: British Policy and the Coming of the Second World War. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Craig. 2007. How to Map Arguments in Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peckham, Morse. 1951. “Toward a Theory of Romanticism.” Proceedings of the Modern Language Association 66(2): 5–23.Google Scholar
Pemberton, William E. 2015. Exit with Honor: The Life and Presidency of Ronald Reagan. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Perkins, David N., and Ritchhart, Ron. 2004. “When Is Good Thinking.” In Motivation, Emotion, and Cognition: Integrative Perspectives on Intellectual Functioning and Development, ed. Dai, David Y. and Sternberg, Robert J.. London: Routledge, pp. 351–384.Google Scholar
Pflanze, Otto. 1955. “Bismarck and German Nationalism.” American Historical Review 60(3): 548–66.Google Scholar
Pflanze, Otto. 1990. Bismarck and the Development of Germany. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ponting, Clive. 1991. 1940: Myth and Reality. Chicago: I. R. Dee.Google Scholar
Posen, Barry R. 2014. Restraint: A New Foundation for US Grand Strategy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent. 2008. “The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities.” International Organization 62(2): 257–88.Google Scholar
Press, Daryl. 2005. Calculating Credibility: How Leaders Assess Military Threats. Ithaca, NY/London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Priester, Joseph R., and Petty, Richard E.. 1995. “Source Attributions and Persuasion: Perceived Honesty as a Determinant of Message Scrutiny.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21(6): 637–54.Google Scholar
Quattrone, George A., and Tversky, Amos. 1988. “Contrasting Rational and Psychological Analyses of Political Choice.” American Political Science Review 82(3): 719–36.Google Scholar
Quinault, Roland. 2001. “Churchill and Democracy.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 11: 201–20.Google Scholar
Rapport, Aaron. 2012. “The Long and Short of It: Cognitive Constraints on Leaders’ Assessments of “Postwar” Iraq, International Security 37(3): 133–71.Google Scholar
Rapport, Aaron. 2015. Waging War, Planning Peace: US Noncombat Operations and Major Wars. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rathbun, Brian C. 2004. Partisan Interventions: European Party Politics and Peace Enforcement in the Balkans. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rathbun, Brian C. 2007a. “Hierarchy and Community at Home and Abroad Evidence of a Common Structure of Domestic and Foreign Policy Beliefs in American Elites.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 51(3): 379–407.Google Scholar
Rathbun, Brian C. 2007b. “Uncertain about Uncertainty: Understanding the Multiple Meanings of a Crucial Concept in International Relations Theory.” International Studies Quarterly 51(3): 533–57.Google Scholar
Rathbun, Brian C. 2008. “A Rose by Any Other Name: Neoclassical Realism as the Natural and Necessary Extension of Neorealism.” Security Studies 17(2): 294–321.Google Scholar
Rathbun, Brian C. 2012. Trust in International Cooperation: International Security Institutions, Domestic Politics and American Multilateralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rathbun, Brian C. 2014. Diplomacy’s Value: Creating Security in 1920s Europe and the Contemporary Middle East. Ithaca, NY/London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rathbun, Brian C. 2017. “Subvert the Dominant Paradigm: A Critical Analysis of Rationalism’s Status as a Paradigm of International Relations.” International Relations 31(4): 403–25.Google Scholar
Rathbun, Brian C. 2018. “The Rarity of Realpolitik: What Bismarck’s Rationality Tells Us about International Politics.” International Security 43(1): 7–55.Google Scholar
Rathbun, Brian C., Kertzer, Joshua D., and Paradis, Mark. 2017. “Homo Diplomaticus: Mixed-Method Evidence of Variation in Strategic Rationality.” International Organization 71(S1): S33–60.Google Scholar
Rathbun, Brian C., Kertzer, Joshua, Reifler, Jason, Goren, Paul, and Scotto, Thomas. 2016. “Taking Foreign Policy Personally: Personal Values and Foreign Policy Attitudes.” International Studies Quarterly 60(1): 124–137.Google Scholar
Reber, Arthur S. 1989. “Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 118(3): 219–35.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas. 1988. Rationality: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Nature and the Rationale of Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, David. 1985. “Churchill and the British ‘Decision’ to Fight on in 1940.” In Diplomacy and Intelligence during the Second World War, ed. Langhorne, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 147–67.Google Scholar
Reynolds, David. 2001. “Churchill’s Writing of History: Appeasement, Autobiography and ‘The Gathering Storm.’” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, Sixth Series 11: 221–47.Google Scholar
Rickert, William E. 1977, Summer. “Winston Churchill’s Archetypal Metaphors: A Mythopoetic Translation of World War II.” Central States Speech Journal 28: 106–12.Google Scholar
Ripsman, Norrin M., and Levy, Jack S.. 2008. “Wishful Thinking or Buying Time?: The Logic of British Appeasement.” International Security 33(2): 148–81.Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1991. “Did ‘Peace through Strength’ End the Cold War? Lessons from INF.” International Security 16(1): 162–88.Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1997. Cooperation among Democracies: The European Influence on US Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Andrew. 1991. The Holy Fox: A Biography of Lord Halifax. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Rogers, Robert D., Owen, Adrian M., Middleton, Hugh C., Williams, Emma J., Pickard, John D., Sahakian, Barbara J., and Robbins, Trevor W.. 1999. “Choosing between Small, Likely Rewards and Large, Unlikely Rewards Activates Inferior and Orbital Prefrontal Cortex.” Journal of Neuroscience 19(20): 9029–38.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Leon. 2008. Romanticism. New York: Parkston Press International.Google Scholar
Ross, Lee, and Ward, Andrew. 1996 “Naive Realism: Implications for Misunderstanding and Divergent Perceptions of Fairness and Bias.” In Values and Knowledge, ed. Brown, Terrance, Reed, Edward, and Turiel, Elliot. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 103–37.Google Scholar
Rubin, Gretchen. 2003. Forty Ways to Look at Winston Churchill: A Brief Account of a Long Life. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Sambanis, Nicholas, Skaperdas, Stergios, and Wohlforth, William C.. 2015. “Nation-Building through War.” American Political Science Review 109(2): 279–96.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas. 1966. Arms and Influence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, Kenneth A. 1999. “Do Democratic Institutions Constrain or Inform? Contrasting Two Institutional Perspectives on Democracy and War.” International Organization 53(02): 233–66.Google Scholar
Schultz, Kenneth A. 2001. Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall. 2006. Unanswered Threats: Political Constraints on the Balance of Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Alexander Maccallum. 1905. William Spencer Churchill. London: Methuen Publishing.Google Scholar
Self, Robert. 2017. Neville Chamberlain: A Biography. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shelden, Michael. 2013. Young Titan: The Making of Winston Churchill. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Shiffrin, Richard M. , and Schneider, Walter. 1977. “Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: II. Perceptual Learning, Automatic Attending and a General Theory.” Psychological Review 84(2): 127–90.Google Scholar
Shiloh, Shoshana, Salton, Efrat, and Sharabi, Dana. 2002. “Individual Differences in Rational and Intuitive Thinking Styles as Predictors of Heuristic Responses and Framing Effects.” Personality and Individual Differences 32(3): 415–29.Google Scholar
Shimko, Keith L. 1991. Images and Arms Control: Perceptions of the Soviet Union in the Reagan Administration. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Shimko, Keith L. 1992. “Reagan on the Soviet Union and the Nature of International Conflict.” Political Psychology 13(3): 353–77.Google Scholar
Simon, Andrew F., Fagley, Nancy S., and Halleran, Jennifer G.. 2004. “Decision Framing: Moderating Effects of Individual Differences and Cognitive Processing.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 17(2): 77–93.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1955. “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 69(1): 99–118.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1978. “Rationality as Process and as Product of Thought.” American Economic Review 68(2):1–16.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1983. Reason in Human Affairs. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sloman, Steven A. 1996. “The Empirical Case for Two Systems of Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin 119(1): 3–22.Google Scholar
Slovic, Paul, Kraus, Nancy, Lappe, Henner, and Major, Marilyn. 1991. “Risk Perception of Prescription Drugs: Report on a Survey in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Public Health/Revue Canadienne de Sante’e Publique 82(3): 15–20.Google Scholar
Smith, Eliot R., and DeCoster, Jamie. 2000. “Dual-Process Models in Social and Cognitive Psychology: Conceptual Integration and Links to Underlying Memory Systems.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 4(2): 108–31.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael Joseph. 1986. Realist Thought from Weber to Kissinger. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Stephen M., and Levin, Irwin P.. 1996. “Need for Cognition and Choice Framing Effects.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 9(4): 283–90.Google Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 2002. “Rational Choice and International Relations.” In Handbook of International Relations, ed. Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A.. London: Sage, pp. 73–94.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack. 2013. Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, Alexander. 2016. Romantic Narratives in International Politics: Pirates, Rebels, and Mercenaries. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Stankiewicz, W. J. 1955. “The Huguenot Downfall: The Influence of Richelieu’s Policy and Doctrine.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 99(3): 146– 68.Google Scholar
Stankiewicz, W. J. 1960. Politics and Religion in Seventeenth-Century France. Berkeley: California University Press.Google Scholar
Stanovich, Keith E. 1999. Who Is Rational?: Studies of Individual Differences in Reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Stanovich, Keith E. 2011. Rationality and the Reflective Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stanovich, Keith E., and West, Richard F.. 1997. “Reasoning Independently of Prior Belief and Individual Differences in Actively Open-Minded Thinking.” Journal of Educational Psychology 89(2): 342–57.Google Scholar
Stanovich, Keith E., and West, Richard F.. 1998. “Individual Differences in Rational Thought.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 127(2): 161–88.Google Scholar
Stanovich, Keith E., and West, Richard F.. 2000. “Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23(5): 645–65.Google Scholar
Stein, Arthur A. 1999. “The Limits of Strategic Choice: Constrained Rationality and Incomplete Explanation.” In Strategic Choice and International Relations, ed. Lake, David A. and Powell, Robert. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 197–228.Google Scholar
Stein, Janice Gross. 1988. “Building Politics into Psychology: The Misperception of Threat.” Political Psychology 9(2): 245–71.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Jonathan. 2012. Bismarck: A Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stokstad, Marilyn. 2005. Art History. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Strack, Fritz, and Deutsch, Roland. 2004. “Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 8(3): 220–47.Google Scholar
Streusand, Douglas E., Bailey, Norman A., and Marlo, Francis H. (eds.). 2016. The Grand Strategy That Won the Cold War. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Suedfeld, Peter, and Tetlock, Philip. 1977. “Integrative Complexity of Communications in International Crises.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 21(1): 169–84.Google Scholar
Talbott, Strobe. 1988. The Master of the Game: Paul Nitze and the Nuclear Peace. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
Taliaferro, Jeffrey W. 2004. Balancing Risks: Great Power Intervention in the Periphery. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Tapié, Victor Lucien. 1967. La France de Louis XIII et de Richelieu. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E. 1983. “Cognitive Style and Political Ideology.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45(1): 118ff.Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E. 1984. “Cognitive Style and Political Belief Systems in the British House of Commons.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46(2): 365ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E. 1998. “Social Psychology and World Politics.” In Handbook of Social Psychology, ed. Gilbert, D., Fiske, S., and Lindzey, G.. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 870–82.Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E. 2005. Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E., and Mellers, Barbara A.. 2002. “The Great Rationality Debate.” Psychological Science 13(1): 94–9.Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E., Peterson, Randall S., and Berry, James M.. 1993. “Flattering and Unflattering Personality Portraits of Integratively Simple and Complex Managers.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64(3): 500–11.Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E., and Tyler, Anthony. 1996. “Churchill’s Cognitive and Rhetorical Style: The Debates Over Nazi Intentions and Self-Government of India.” Political Psychology 17(1): 149–70.Google Scholar
Thompson, Kenneth. 1983. Winston Churchill’s World View: Statesmanship and Power. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Neville. 1971. The Anti-Appeasers: Conservative Opposition to Appeasement in the 1930s. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tingley, Dustin H. 2011. The Dark Side of the Future: An Experimental Test of Commitment Problems in Bargaining.” International Studies Quarterly 55(2): 521–54.Google Scholar
Toates, Frederick. 2006. “A Model of the Hierarchy of Behaviour, Cognition, and Consciousness.” Consciousness and Cognition 15(1): 75–118.Google Scholar
Toplak, Maggie E., and Stanovich, Keith E.. 2003. “Associations between Myside Bias on an Informal Reasoning Task and Amount of Post‐Secondary Education.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 17(7): 851–60.Google Scholar
Trachtenberg, Marc. 2003. “The Question of Realism.” Security Studies 13(1): 156–94.Google Scholar
Treasure, Geoffrey Russell Richards. 1972. Cardinal Richelieu and the Development of Absolutism. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1973. “Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability.” Cognitive Psychology 5(2): 207–32.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1983. “Extensional versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment.” Psychological Review 90(4): 293–315.Google Scholar
Tziampiris, Aristotle. 2009. Faith and Reason of State: Lessons from Early Modern Europe and Cardinal Richelieu. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Varshney, Ashutosh. 2003. “Nationalism, Ethnic Conflict, and Rationality.” Perspectives on Politics 1(1): 85–99.Google Scholar
Verplanken, Bas. 1993. “Need for Cognition and External Information Search: Responses to Time Pressure during Decision-Making.” Journal of Research in Personality 27(3): 238–52.Google Scholar
Verplanken, Bas, Hazenberg, Pieter T., and Palenewen, Grace R.. 1992. “Need for Cognition and External Information Search Effort.” Journal of Research in Personality 26(2): 128–36.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. 1959. Man, the State and War. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Boston: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. 1998. “The Origins of War in Neorealist Theory.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 18(4): 615–28.Google Scholar
Weber, Hermann. 1992. “‘Une Bonne Paix’: Richelieu’s Foreign Policy and the Peace of Christendom.” In Richelieu and His Age, ed. Joseph, Bergin and Brockliss, Laurence. Oxford: Clarendon, pp. 45–70.Google Scholar
Webster, Donna M., and Kruglanski, Arie W.. 1994. “Individual Differences in Need for Cognitive Closure.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73(4): 733–46.Google Scholar
Welch, David. 1993. Justice and the Genesis of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1987. “The Agent–Structure Problem in International Relations Theory.” International Organization 41(3): 335–70.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Nicholas J. 2013. “Investigating Diplomatic Transformations.” International Affairs, 89(2): 477–96.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Nicholas J. 2018. Trusting Enemies: Interpersonal Relationships in International Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Graham. 2014. The Triumph of Improvisation: Gorbachev’s Adaptability, Reagan’s Engagement, and the End of the Cold War. Ithaca, NY/London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wittkopf, Eugene R. 1990. Faces of Internationalism: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Wohlforth, William C. 1994 “Realism and the End of the Cold War.” International Security 19(3): 91–129.Google Scholar
Wohlforth, William C. (ed.). 1996. Witnesses to the End of the Cold War. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Alan. 1981, December. “Ronald, the Romantic Radical.” Mother Jones 37–40.Google Scholar
Wright, Anthony D. 2011. The Divisions of French Catholicism, 1629–1645: “The Parting of the Ways.” Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Wrigley, Chris. 2001. “Churchill and the Trade Unions.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, Sixth Series 11: 273–93.Google Scholar
Yarhi-Milo, Keren. 2014. Knowing the Adversary: Leaders, Intelligence, and Assessment of Intentions in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zacher, Mark, and Matthew, Richard. 1995. “Liberal International Relations Theory: Common Threads, Divergent Strands.” In Controversies in International Relations Theory, ed. Kegley, Charles. New York: St. Martin’s Press, pp. 107–50.Google Scholar
Zagare, Frank C. 1990. “Rationality and Deterrence.” World Politics 42(2): 238–60.Google Scholar
Zarnett, David. 2017. “What Does Realist Foreign Policy Activism Tell Us about Realist Theory?” Foreign Policy Analysis 13(3): 618–37.Google Scholar
Ziblatt, Daniel. 2006. Structuring the State: The Formation of Italy and Germany and the Puzzle of Federalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×