Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:25:10.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - An Inegalitarian Paradox

On the Uneven Gendering of Computing Work around the World

from Part I - Global Perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2019

By
Tiffany Chow  and
Maria Charles
Edited by
Carol Frieze  and
Jeria L. Quesenberry
Carol Frieze
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University, Pennsylvania
Jeria L. Quesenberry
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University, Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

Previous research has revealed surprising cross-national differences in the gender composition of information and communication technology (ICT) fields. In 2001, for example, women’s representation in ICT degree programs was weakest in the world’s most affluent and reputably gender-progressive societies (Charles and Bradley, 2006). Historical trends in the ICT sectors of affluent democracies seem, moreover, to have gone in the direction of more, not less, gender segregation. Despite dramatic increases in female labor force participation and university attendance, US women’s share of bachelor’s degrees in computer science decreased from 28% to 18% between 2000 and 2015 (NSF, 2018, appendix 2-21), with similar declines documented in Europe for the 1990s (Schinzel, 2002).

Type
Chapter
Information
Cracking the Digital Ceiling
Women in Computing around the World
 , pp. 25 - 45
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbate, J. (2012). Recoding Gender: Women’s Changing Participation in Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Alfrey, L., and Twine, F. W. (2017). “Gender-Fluid Geek Girls: Negotiating Inequality Regimes in the Tech Industry.” Gender & Society 31: 28–50.Google Scholar
Baker, D. P., and LeTendre, G. K. (2005). National Differences, Global Similarities: World Culture and the Future of Schooling. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, K. (2000). “The Incorporation of Women into Higher Education: Paradoxical Outcomes?” Sociology of Education 73: 1–18.Google Scholar
Cech, E., Rubineau, B., Silbey, S., and Seron, C. (2011). “Professional Role Confidence and Gendered Persistence in Engineering.” American Sociological Review 76: 641–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, M. (2011a). “What Gender Is Science?” Contexts 10: 22–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, M. (2011b). “A World of Difference: International Trends in Women’s Economic Status.” Annual Review of Sociology 37: 355–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, Maria. (2017). “Venus, Mars, and Math: Gender, Societal Affluence and Eighth Graders’ Aspirations for STEM.” SOCIUS 3: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, Maria, and Bradley, Karen. (2006). “A Matter of Degrees: Female Underrepresentation in Computer Science Programs Cross-Nationally.” In Cohoon, Joanne McGrath and Aspray, Bill, eds., Women and Information Technology: Research on the Reasons for Underrepresentation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 183–203.Google Scholar
Charles, Maria, and Bradley, Karen. (2009). “Indulging Our Gendered Selves? Sex Segregation by Field of Study in 44 Countries.” American Journal of Sociology 114: 924–976.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charles, M., and Grusky, D. B. (2004). Occupational Ghettos: The Worldwide Segregation of Women and Men. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., and Steel, C. M. (2009). “Ambient Belonging: How Stereotypical Cues Impact Gender Participation in Computer Science.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97: 1045–1060.Google Scholar
Ensmenger, N. (2015). “Beards, Sandals, and Other Signs of Rugged Individualism: Masculine Culture within the Computing Professions.” OSIRIS 30: 38–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frehill, L. M., and McGrath Cohoon, J. (2015). “Gender and Computing.” In Pearson, Willie Jr., Frehill, Lisa M., and McNeely, Connie L., eds., Advancing Women in Science: An International Perspective. New York: Springer, pp. 237–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huyer, S. (2015). “Is the Gender Gap Narrowing in Science and Engineering?” In UNESCO Global Science Report 2015. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
ILO (International Labour Office). (2012). International Standard Classification of Occupations. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
ILO (International Labour Office). (2018). ILOSTAT. www.ilo.org/global/statistics-and-databases/lang--en/index.htm. Accessed July 31, 2018, via web download and personal communication.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R., and Norris, P. (2003). Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, R. M. (1998). Destined for Equality: The Inevitable Rise of Women’s Status. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, H., Cho, Y., Kim, S., and Kim, H. (2018). “Women and Men in Computer Science: Geeky Proclivities, College Rank, and Gender in Korea.” East Asian Science, Technology and Society 12(1): 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagesen, V. A. (2008). “A Cyberfeminist Utopia? Perceptions of Gender and Computer Science among Malaysian Women Computer Science Students and Faculty.” Science, Technology & Values 33: 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, Y., and Liu, Y. (2017). “Entry and Degree Attainment in STEM: The Intersection of Gender and Race/Ethnicity.” Social Sciences 6: 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, J., and Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, M. G., Gurr, T. R., and Jaggers, K. (2014). Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2013. Dataset Users’ Manual. Vienna, VA: Center for Systemic Peace.Google Scholar
Mehta, B. S. (2016). “A Decent Work Framework: Women in the ICT Sector in India.” Information Development 32: 1718–1729.Google Scholar
Ministry of Human Resource Development. (2018). All India Survey on Higher Education, 2017–18. New Delhi: Department of Higher Education.Google Scholar
National Science Foundation (NSF). (2018). Science and Engineering Indicators 2018. NSB-2018-1. Alexandria, VA: NSF, www.nsf.gov/statistics/indicators/.Google Scholar
Othman, M., and Laith, R. (2006). “Women in Computer Science: No Shortage Here!” Communications of the ACM 49(3): 111–114.Google Scholar
Polity Project. (2018). “Polity IV Annual Time-Series 1800–2017.” www.systemicpeace.org/inscrdata.html. Accessed July 31, 2018.Google Scholar
Schinzel, B. (2002). “Cultural Differences of Female Enrollment in Tertiary Education in Computer Science.” Proceedings of the IFIP 17th World Computer Congress 230: 201–208.Google Scholar
Stoet, G., and Geary, D. C. (2018). “The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education.” Psychological Science 29: 581–593.Google Scholar
Thébaud, S., and Charles, M. (2018). “Segregation, Stereotypes, and STEM.” Social Sciences 7: 1–19.Google Scholar
Treiman, D. J. (1970). “Industrialization and Social Stratification.” In Laumann, Edward O., ed., Social Stratification: Research and Theory for the 1970s. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, pp. 207–234.Google Scholar
UNDP (United Nations Development Program). (2016). “Human Development Data, 1990–2017.” http://hdr.undp.org/en/data. Accessed July 31, 2018.Google Scholar
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) Institute for Statistics. (2018). UIS. http://data.uis.unesco.org/. Accessed October 31, 2018.Google Scholar
Varma, R., and Kapur, D. (2015). “Decoding Femininity in Computer Science in India.” Communications of the ACM 58(5): 56–62.Google Scholar
Wynn, A., and Correll, S. J. (2017). “Gendered Perceptions of Cultural and Skill Alignment in Technology Companies.” Social Sciences 6(2): 45. doi:10.3390/socsci6020045.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×