Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Surveying the Imagination Landscape
- Part I Theoretical Perspectives on the Imagination
- 2 The Evolution of a Human Imagination
- 3 Material Imagination: An Anthropological Perspective
- 4 The Archaeological Imagination
- 5 Philosophical Perspectives on Imagination in the Western Tradition
- 6 Imagination in Classical India: A Short Introduction
- 7 From Prediction to Imagination
- 8 Memory and Imagination: Perspectives on Constructive Episodic Simulation
- 9 Capturing the Imagination
- 10 A Sociocultural Perspective on Imagination
- 11 Artificial Intelligence and Imagination
- Part II Imagery-Based Forms of the Imagination
- Part III Intentionality-Based Forms of the Imagination
- Part IV Novel Combinatorial Forms of the Imagination
- Part V Phenomenology-Based Forms of the Imagination
- Part VI Altered States of the Imagination
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- References
4 - The Archaeological Imagination
from Part I - Theoretical Perspectives on the Imagination
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 May 2020
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Surveying the Imagination Landscape
- Part I Theoretical Perspectives on the Imagination
- 2 The Evolution of a Human Imagination
- 3 Material Imagination: An Anthropological Perspective
- 4 The Archaeological Imagination
- 5 Philosophical Perspectives on Imagination in the Western Tradition
- 6 Imagination in Classical India: A Short Introduction
- 7 From Prediction to Imagination
- 8 Memory and Imagination: Perspectives on Constructive Episodic Simulation
- 9 Capturing the Imagination
- 10 A Sociocultural Perspective on Imagination
- 11 Artificial Intelligence and Imagination
- Part II Imagery-Based Forms of the Imagination
- Part III Intentionality-Based Forms of the Imagination
- Part IV Novel Combinatorial Forms of the Imagination
- Part V Phenomenology-Based Forms of the Imagination
- Part VI Altered States of the Imagination
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
The archaeological imagination is defined as a creative capacity mobilized when we experience traces and vestiges of the past, when we encounter, gather, classify, conserve and restore, when we work with such remains, collections, archives to deliver narratives, reconstructions, accounts, explanations, or whatever. Examples are given and features described of such archaeological experiences that reach far beyond the academic discipline: the dynamics of working creatively with what remains. The roots of the archaeological imagination are traced in three phases from the seventeenth century: challenges to traditional relationships with the past associated with field science; the empirical accumulation of material remains of the past; the expansion of the heritage industry in post–1970s globalization. Encompassing wide cultural valency, the archaeological imagination is argued to be a key aspect, relating to temporality and materiality, of contemporary cultural agency: our imaginative capacity to work with what remains in building future worlds.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination , pp. 47 - 63Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Andreassen, E., Bjerck, H. B., and Olsen, B. (2010). Persistent Memories: Pyramiden – A Soviet Mining Town in the High Arctic. Trondheim, Norway: Tapir Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, D. (2018). Breaking the Surface: An Art/Archaeology of Prehistoric Architecture. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, S. (1996). Excavations and Their Objects: Freud’s Collection of Antiquity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Buchli, V., Lucas, G., and Cox, M. (2001). Archaeologies of the Contemporary Past. London, UK; New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Díaz-Andreu García, M. (2007). A World History of Nineteenth-Century Archaeology: Nationalism, Colonialism, and the Past. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, D. D., and Dixon, J. T. (1903). Upper Coquetdale: Its History, Traditions, Folklore and Scenery. Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK: Robert Redpath.Google Scholar
Finn, C. (2001). Artifacts: An Archaeologist’s Year in Silicon Valley. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, C.(2004). Past Poetic: Archaeology in the Poetry of W. B. Yeats and Seamus Heaney. London, UK: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell Polity.Google Scholar
González-Ruibal, A. (ed.) (2013). Reclaiming Archaeology: Beyond the Tropes of Modernity. Abingdon, UK; New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Ruibal, A.(2018). An Archaeology of the Contemporary Era. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graves-Brown, P., Harrison, R., and Piccini, A. (eds.). (2013). The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of the Contemporary World. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, R. (2013). Heritage: Critical Approaches. Milton Park, Abingdon; New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harrison, R.(2018). On Heritage Ontologies: Rethinking the Material Worlds of Heritage. Anthropological Quarterly, 91, 1365–1383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, R., and Schofield, A. J. (2010). After Modernity: Archaeological Approaches to the Contemporary Past. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, K. (2007). Shadow Sites: Photography, Archaeology, and the British Landscape, 1927–1955. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobsbawm, E., and Ranger, T. (eds.) (1983). The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. (1999). The Archaeological Process: An Introduction. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hodder, I.(2012). Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships Between Humans and Things. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Holtorf, C. (2005). From Stonehenge to Las Vegas: Archaeology as Popular Culture. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
Holtorf, C.(2007). Archaeology Is a Brand: The Meaning of Archaeology in Contemporary Popular Culture. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
Holtorf, C., and Piccini, A. (eds.) (2009). Contemporary Archaeologies: Excavating Now. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Knappett, C., and Malafouris, L. (2008). Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach. Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
Kohl, P. L., and Fawcett, C. (1995). Nationalism, Politics and the Practice of Archaeology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lowenthal, D. (2013). The Past Is a Foreign Country – Revisited. Revised and updated edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lucas, G. (2001). Critical Approaches to Fieldwork: Contemporary and Historical Archaeological Practice. London, UK; New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Malafouris, L. (2013). How Things Shape the Mind: A Theory of Material Engagement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Moshenska, G.(2012). M. R. James and the Archaeological Uncanny. Antiquity, 86(334), 1192–1201.Google Scholar
Neville, B., and Villeneuve, J. (eds.) (2002). Waste-Site Stories: The Recycling of Memory. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivier, L. (2012). The Dark Abyss of Time: Archaeology and Memory. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Olsen, B. (2010). In Defense of Things: Archaeology and the Ontology of Objects. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Olsen, B., and Petusdottir, Þ., (eds.) (2014). Ruin Memories: Materiality, Aesthetics and the Archaeology of the Recent Past. Abingdon, UK; New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Olsen, B., Shanks, M., Webmoor, T., and Witmore, C. (2012). Archaeology: The Discipline of Things. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Preucel, R. W., and Mrozowski, S. A. (2010). Contemporary Archaeology in Theory: The New Pragmatism. 2nd edition. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rathje, W., Shanks, M., and Witmore, C. (eds.) (2012). Archaeology in the Making: Conversations Through a Discipline. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rathje, W. L., and Murphy, C. (1992). Rubbish!: The Archaeology of Garbage. New York, NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., and Bahn, P. (2016). Archaeology: Theories, Methods, and Practice. 7th edition. London, UK: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Russell, I., and Cochrane, A. (2013). Art and Archaeology: Collaborations, Conversations, Criticisms. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Schnapp, A. (1996). The Discovery of the Past: The Origins of Archaeology. Translated by I. Kinnes and G. Varndell. London, UK: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Schnapp, A. (ed.) (1997). Une archéologie du passé récent. Paris, France: Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.Google Scholar
Schnapp, J., Shanks, M., and Tiews, M. (2004). Archaeologies of the Modern. Modernism/Modernity, 11(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanks, M. (1992). Experiencing the Past: On the Character of Archaeology. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shanks, M.(2013). Let Me Tell You About Hadrian’s Wall: Heritage, Performance, and Design. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Reinwardt Academie.Google Scholar
Shanks, M., and McGuire, R. (1996). The Craft of Archaeology. American Antiquity, 61, 75–88.Google Scholar
Shanks, M., and Svabo, C. (2013). Archaeology and Photography: A Pragmatology. In González-Ruibal, A (ed.), Reclaiming Archaeology: Beyond the Tropes of Modernity. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shanks, M., and Tilley, C. (1987). Reconstructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shanks, M., and Witmore, C. (2010). Memory Practices and the Archaeological Imagination in Risk Society: Design and Long-Term Community. In Koerner, S and Russell, I (eds.), The Unquiet Past: Theoretical Perspectives on Archaeology and Cultural Heritage. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Sweet, R. (2004). Antiquaries: The Discovery of the Past in Eighteenth-Century Britain. London, UK: Hambledon.Google Scholar
Trigger, B. (1984). Alternative Archaeologies: Nationalist, Colonialist, Imperialist. Man, 19, 355–370.Google Scholar
Tringham, R. (2019). Giving Voices (Without Words) to Prehistoric People: Glimpses into an Archaeologist’s Imagination. European Journal of Archaeology, 22(3), 338–353.Google Scholar
Wallace, J. (2004). Digging the Dirt: The Archaeological Imagination. London, UK: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Witmore, C. (2007). Symmetrical Archaeology: Excerpts of a Manifesto. World Archaeology, 39(4), 546–562.Google Scholar
Zielinski, S. (2006). Deep Time of the Media: Toward an Archaeology of Hearing and Seeing by Technical Means. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by