Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T16:40:49.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 5 - Interventions in Pregnancy to Reduce Risk of Stillbirth

from Section 1: - General Principles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2019

Mark D. Kilby
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Anthony Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Texas Medical School at Houston
Dick Oepkes
Affiliation:
Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
Get access

Summary

Stillbirth remains a global health challenge, with more than 2.6 million stillbirths per year [1]. Although only 2% of the global burden of stillbirths is in high-income countries (HICs), with virtually no improvement in rates for over two decades, action in HICs is urgently needed [2]. There is a six-fold difference between the highest and lowest rates (Ukraine 8.8 stillbirths per 1,000 births after 28 weeks vs. Iceland 1.3 stillbirths per 1,000 births). As well as variation between countries it is well established that there is variation within countries, with women from indigenous or minority ethnic groups, migrant populations or socioeconomically deprived groups as well as women at extremes of maternal age being at increased risk of stillbirth [2]. The disparity between and within countries suggests that more could be done in HICs to reduce stillbirth rates: this includes reducing the frequency of substandard care recurrently described in Confidential Enquiries into Stillbirth and implementing strategies to mitigate the increased risk of stillbirth in specific groups of women [3, 4].

Type
Chapter
Information
Fetal Therapy
Scientific Basis and Critical Appraisal of Clinical Benefits
, pp. 48 - 60
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lawn, JE, Blencowe, H, Waiswa, P, Amouzou, A, Mathers, C, Hogan, D, The Lancet Ending Preventable Stillbirths series study group. Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030. Lancet. 2016; 387: 587603.Google Scholar
Flenady, V, Wojcieszek, AM, Middleton, P, Ellwood, D, Erwich, JJ, Coory, M, et al. Stillbirths: recall to action in high-income countries. Lancet. 2016; 387: 691702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Draper, E, Kurinczuk, JJ, Kenyon, S (eds.), on behalf of MBRRACE-UK. MBRRACE-UK 2017 Perinatal Confidential Enquiry: Term, Singleton, Intrapartum Stillbirth and Intrapartum-Related Neonatal Death. The Infant Mortality and Morbidity Studies. Leicester: Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 2017.Google Scholar
Draper, ES KJ, Kenyon, S. (eds.), on behalf of MBRRACE-UK. MBRRACE-UK Perinatal Confidential Enquiry: Term, Singleton, Normally Formed, Antepartum Stillbirth. The Infant Mortality and Morbidity Studies. Leicester: Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 2015.Google Scholar
Flenady, V, Koopmans, L, Middleton, P, Frøen, JF, Smith, GC, Gibbons, K, et al. Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2011; 377: 1331–40.Google Scholar
Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network Writing Group. Association between stillbirth and risk factors known at pregnancy confirmation. JAMA. 2011; 306: 2469–79.Google Scholar
Maternal and Child Health Consortium. (2001). Confidential Enquiry Into Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy: 8th Annual Report of the Confidential Enquiries into Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy (CESDI).Google Scholar
Geenes, V, Chappell, LC, Seed, PT, Steer, PJ, Knight, M, Williamson, C. Association of severe intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with adverse pregnancy outcomes: a prospective population-based case-control study. Hepatology. 2014; 59: 1482–91.Google Scholar
Herrera, CA, Manuck, TA, Stoddard, GJ, Varner, MW, Esplin, S, Clark, EAS, et al. Perinatal outcomes associated with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018; 31: 1913–20.Google Scholar
Ovadia, C, Seed, PT, Sklavounos, A, Geenes, V, Di Ilio, C, Chambers, J, et al. Association of adverse perinatal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with biochemical markers: results of aggregate and individual patient data meta-analyses. Lancet. 2019; 393: 899909.Google Scholar
Williamson, C, Gorelik, J, Eaton, BM, Lab, M, de Swiet, M, Korchev, Y. The bile acid taurocholate impairs rat cardiomyocyte function: a proposed mechanism for intra-uterine fetal death in obstetric cholestasis. Clin Sci. 2001; 100: 363–9.Google Scholar
Geenes, VL, Lim, YH, Bowman, N, Tailor, H, Dixon, PH, Chambers, J, et al. A placental phenotype for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Placenta. 2011; 32: 1026–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Green Top Guidelines 55: Late Intrauterine Fetal Death and Stillbirth, 1st edn. London: RCOG, 2010.Google Scholar
Chappell, LC, Gurung, V, Seed, PT, Chambers, J, Williamson, C, Thornton, JG. Ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo, and early term delivery versus expectant management, in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: semifactorial randomised clinical trial. BMJ. 2012; 344: e3799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grand’Maison, S, Durand, M, Mahone, M. The effects of ursodeoxycholic acid treatment for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy on maternal and fetal outcomes: A meta-analysis including non-randomized studies. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014; 36: 632–41.Google Scholar
Kohari, KS, Carroll, R, Capogna, S, Ditchik, A, Fox, NS, Ferrara, LA. Outcome after implementation of a modern management strategy for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017; 30: 1342–6.Google Scholar
Mathers, CD, Loncar, D. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Medicine. 2006; 3: e442.Google Scholar
Egan, AM, Hod, M, Mahmood, T, Dunne, FP. Perspectives on diagnostic strategies for hyperglycaemia in pregnancy – dealing with the barriers and challenges: Europe. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018; 145: 6772.Google Scholar
Martis, R, Brown, J, Alsweiler, J, Crawford, TJ, Crowther, CA. Different intensities of glycaemic control for women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 4: Cd011624.Google Scholar
McCurdy, CE, Friedman, JE. Mechanisms Underlying Insulin Resistance in Human Pregnancy and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. In Kim, C and Ferrara, A, eds., Gestational Diabetes During and After Pregnancy. London: Springer London, 2010, pp. 125–38.Google Scholar
The HAPO study cooperative research group. hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358: 19912002.Google Scholar
Schaefer-Graf, U, Napoli, A, Nolan, CJ. Diabetes in pregnancy: a new decade of challenges ahead. Diabetologia. 2018; 61: 1012–21.Google Scholar
Macintosh, MC, Fleming, KM, Bailey, JA, Doyle, P, Modder, J, Acolet, D, et al. Perinatal mortality and congenital anomalies in babies of women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland: Population based study. BMJ. 2006; 333: 177.Google Scholar
Baptiste-Roberts, K, Nicholson, WK, Wang, NY, Brancati, FL. Gestational diabetes and subsequent growth patterns of offspring: the National Collaborative Perinatal Project. Matern Child Health J. 2012; 16: 125–32.Google Scholar
West, NA, Crume, TL, Maligie, MA, Dabelea, D. Cardiovascular risk factors in children exposed to maternal diabetes in utero. Diabetologia. 2011; 54: 504–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Philipps, LH, Santhakumaran, S, Gale, C, Prior, E, Logan, KM, Hyde, MJ, Modi, N. The diabetic pregnancy and offspring BMI in childhood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2011; 54: 1957–66.Google Scholar
Bellamy, L, Casas, JP, Hingorani, AD, Williams, D. Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009; 373: 1773–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wahabi, HA, Alzeidan, RA, Esmaeil, SA. Pre-pregnancy care for women with pre-gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12: 792.Google Scholar
Scheffler, RM, Feuchtbaum, LB, Phibbs, CS. Prevention: the cost-effectiveness of the California Diabetes and Pregnancy Program. Am J Public Health. 1992; 82: 168–75.Google Scholar
Nankervis, A, McIntyre, HD, Moses, R, Ross, GP, Callaway, L, Porter, C, et al. (2013). Australasian Diabetes In Pregnancy Society (ADIPS) Consensus Guidelines for the Testing and Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Australia. http://www.adips.org/downloads/ADIPSConsensusGuidelinesGDM-03.05.13VersionACCEPTEDFINAL.pdfGoogle Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2015). Diabetes in pregnancy: management from preconception to the postnatal period. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng3/resources/diabetes-in-pregnancy-management-from-preconception-to-the-postnatal-period-51038446021Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 131: e49–64.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health. Screening, Diagnosis and Management of Gestational Diabetes in New Zealand: A Clinical Practice Guideline. Wellington: Ministry of Health, 2014.Google Scholar
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Healthcare Improvement Scotland (2017). Management of Diabetes: A National Clinical Guideline. https://www.sign.ac.uk/assets/sign116.pdfGoogle Scholar
Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee, Thompson, D, Berger, H, Feig, D, Gagnon, R, Kader, T, et al. Diabetes and pregnancy. Can J Diabetes. 2013; 37: S168–83.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Diagnostic Criteria and Classification of Hyperglycaemia First Detected in Pregnancy. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2013.Google Scholar
Nankervis, A, Conn, J. Gestational diabetes mellitus: negotiating the confusion. Aust Fam Physician. 2013; 42: 528–31.Google Scholar
Prutsky, GJ, Domecq, JP, Wang, Z, Carranza Leon, BG, Elraiyah, T, Nabhan, M, et al. Glucose targets in pregnant women with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013; 98: 4319–24.Google Scholar
American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2013. Diabetes Care. 2013; 36 (Suppl. 1): S11–66.Google Scholar
Stacey, T, Tennant, P, McCowan, L, Mitchell, EA, Budd, J, Li, M, et al. Gestational diabetes and the risk of late stillbirth: a case-control study from England, UK. BJOG. 2019; 126: 973–82.Google Scholar
Metzger, BE, Buchanan, TA, Coustan, DR, de Leiva, A, Dunger, DB, Hadden, DR, et al. Summary and recommendations of the Fifth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2007; 30 (Suppl. 2): S251–60.Google Scholar
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Management of Diabetes. A National Clinical Guideline. Edinburgh: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, 2010.Google Scholar
National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health (UK). Diabetes in Pregnancy: Management of Diabetes and Its Complications from Preconception to the Postnatal Period. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2008.Google Scholar
Brown, J, Alwan, NA, West, J, Brown, S, McKinlay, CJ, Farrar, D, Crowther, CA. Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of women with gestational diabetes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 5: Cd011970.Google Scholar
Flenady, V, Middleton, P, Smith, GC, Duke, W, Erwich, JJ, Khong, TY, et al. Stillbirths: The way forward in high-income countries. Lancet. 2011; 377: 1703–17.Google Scholar
Nijkamp, JW, Korteweg, FJ, Holm, JP, Timmer, A, Erwich, JJHM, van Pampus, MG. Subsequent pregnancy outcome after previous foetal death. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013; 166: 3742.Google Scholar
Monari, F, Pedrielli, G, Vergani, P, Pozzi, E, Mecacci, F, Serena, C, et al. Adverse perinatal outcome in subsequent pregnancy after stillbirth by placental vascular disorders. PLOS One. 2016; 11: e0155761.Google Scholar
Derricott, H, Jones, RL, Heazell, AE. Investigating the association of villitis of unknown etiology with stillbirth and fetal growth restriction – a systematic review. Placenta. 2013; 34: 856–62.Google Scholar
Contro, E, deSouza, R, Bhide, A. Chronic intervillositis of the placenta: a systematic review. Placenta. 2010; 31: 1106–10.Google Scholar
Wojcieszek, AM, Shepherd, E, Middleton, P, Lassi, ZS, Wilson, T, Murphy, MM, et al. Care prior to and during subsequent pregnancies following stillbirth for improving outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 5: CD012203.Google Scholar
Mills, TA, Ricklesford, C, Cooke, A, Heazell, AE, Whitworth, M, Lavender, T. Parents’ experiences and expectations of care in pregnancy after stillbirth or neonatal death: a metasynthesis. BJOG. 2014; 121: 943–50.Google Scholar
Bujold, E, Roberge, S, Nicolaides, KH. Low-dose aspirin for prevention of adverse outcomes related to abnormal placentation. Prenat Diagn. 2014; 34: 642–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rolnik, DL, Wright, D, Poon, LC, O’Gorman, N, Syngelaki, A, de Paco Matallana, C, et al. Aspirin versus placebo in pregnancies at high risk for preterm preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377: 613–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mekinian, A, Costedoat-Chalumeau, N, Masseau, A, Botta, A, Chudzinski, A, Theulin, A, et al. Chronic histiocytic intervillositis: outcome, associated diseases and treatment in a multicenter prospective study. Autoimmunity. 2015; 48: 40–5.Google Scholar
Grivell, RM, Alfirevic, Z, Gyte, GM, Devane, D. Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 9: Cd007863.Google Scholar
Stock, SJ, Ferguson, E, Duffy, A, Ford, I, Chalmers, J, Norman, JE. Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study. BMJ. 2012; 344: e2838.Google Scholar
Hilder, L, Costeloe, K, Thilaganathan, B. Prolonged pregnancy: evaluating gestation-specific risks of fetal and infant mortality. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998; 105: 169–73.Google Scholar
Olesen, AW, Westergaard, JG, Olsen, J. Perinatal and maternal complications related to postterm delivery: a national register-based study, 1978-1993. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 189: 222–7.Google Scholar
Jones, CJ, Fox, H. Ultrastructure of the placenta in prolonged pregnancy. J Pathol. 1978; 126: 173–9.Google Scholar
Smith, SC, Baker, PN. Placental apoptosis is increased in post-term pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999; 106: 861–2.Google Scholar
Middleton, P, Shepherd, E, Crowther, CA. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 5: Cd004945.Google Scholar
Zizzo, AR, Kirkegaard, I, Pinborg, A, Ulbjerg, N. Decline in stillbirths and perinatal mortality after implementation of a more aggressive induction policy in post-date pregnancies: a nationwide register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017; 96: 862–7.Google Scholar
Yudkin, PL, Wood, L, Redman, CW. Risk of unexplained stillbirth at different gestational ages. Lancet. 1987; 1: 1192–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Lean, SC, Derricott, H, Jones, RL, Heazell, AEP. Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017; 12: e0186287.Google Scholar
Lean, SC, Heazell, AEP, Dilworth, MR, Mills, TA, Jones, RL. Placental dysfunction underlies increased risk of fetal growth restriction and stillbirth in advanced maternal age women. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 9677.Google Scholar
Knight, HE, Cromwell, DA, Gurol-Urganci, I, Harron, K, van der Meulen, JH, Smith, GCS. Perinatal mortality associated with induction of labour versus expectant management in nulliparous women aged 35 years or over: An English national cohort study. PLoS Medicine. 2017; 14: e1002425.Google Scholar
Walker, KF, Bugg, GJ, Macpherson, M, McCormick, C, Grace, N, Wildsmith, C, et al. Randomized Trial of Labor Induction in Women 35 Years of Age or Older. N Engl J Med. 2016; 374: 813–22.Google Scholar
Crump, C, Sundquist, K, Winkleby, MA, Sundquist, J. Early-term birth (37-38 weeks) and mortality in young adulthood. Epidemiology (Cambridge, MA). 2013; 24: 270–6.Google Scholar
Spong, CY, Mercer, BM, D’Alton, M, Kilpatrick, S, Blackwell, S, Saade, G. Timing of indicated late-preterm and early-term birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118: 323–33.Google Scholar
Chan, E, Leong, P, Malouf, R, Quigley, MA. Long-term cognitive and school outcomes of late-preterm and early-term births: a systematic review. Child Care Health Dev. 2016; 42: 297312.Google Scholar
Bentley, JP, Roberts, CL, Bowen, JR, Martin, AJ, Morris, JM, Nassar, N. Planned birth before 39 weeks and child development: A population-based study. Pediatrics. 2016; 138: e20162002.Google Scholar
Frøen, JF, Tveit, JV, Saastad, E, Bordahl, PE, Stray-Pedersen, B, Heazell, AE, et al. Management of decreased fetal movements. Semin Perinatol. 2008; 32: 307–11.Google Scholar
Warrander, LK, Batra, G, Bernatavicius, G, Greenwood, SL, Dutton, P, Jones, RL, et al. Maternal perception of reduced fetal movements is associated with altered placental structure and function. PloS One. 2012; 7: e34851.Google Scholar
Saastad, E, Winje, BA, Israel, P, Froen, JF. Fetal movement counting – maternal concern and experiences: A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Birth. 2012; 39: 1020.Google Scholar
Frøen, JF. A kick from within – fetal movement counting and the cancelled progress in antenatal care. J Perinat Med. 2004; 32: 1324.Google Scholar
Sergent, F, Lefevre, A, Verspyck, E, Marpeau, L. Decreased fetal movements in the third trimester: What to do? Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2005; 33: 861–9.Google Scholar
Tveit, JVH, Saastad, E, Stray-Pedersen, B, Børdahl, PE, Flenady, V, Fretts, R, Frøen, JF. Reduction of late stillbirth with the introduction of fetal movement information and guidelines – a clinical quality improvement. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009; 9: 32.Google Scholar
Flenady, V, MacPhail, J, Gardener, G, Chadha, Y, Mahomed, K, Heazell, A, et al. Detection and management of decreased fetal movements in Australia and New Zealand: A survey of obstetric practice. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009; 49: 358–63.Google Scholar
Heazell, AE, Green, M, Wright, C, Flenady, V, Froen, JF. Midwives’ and obstetricians’ knowledge and management of women presenting with decreased fetal movements. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008; 87: 331–9.Google Scholar
Gardener, G, Daly, L, Bowring, V, Burton, G, Chadha, Y, Ellwood, D, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Care of Women with Decreased Fetal Movements. Brisbane: Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, 2017.Google Scholar
Department of Health. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Pregnancy Care. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health, 2018.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynacologists (2011). Green-top guideline 57: Reduced fetal Movement. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg57/Google Scholar
International Stillbirth Alliance (2017). Position Statement: Fetal Movement Monitoring, Version 2. http://stillbirthalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/ISA_DFM_Position_Statement_Final-V2-June-2017.pdfGoogle Scholar
Flenady, V. Making Stillbirths Visible and Moving to Action (Invited Speaker). 2018 International Conference on Stillbirths, SIDS and Baby Survival. Glasgow, 2018. Abstract available at https://ispid-isa.org/2018/PublishingImages/abstract-information/abstract-e-book/ISPID2018ebook.pdfGoogle Scholar
McArdle, A, Flenady, V, Toohill, J, Gamble, J, Creedy, D. How pregnant women learn about foetal movements: sources and preferences for information. Women And Birth. 2015; 28: 54–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birkenfeld, A, Laufer, N, Sadovsky, E. Diurnal variation of fetal activity. Obstet Gynecol. 1980; 55: 417–19.Google Scholar
Druzin, M, Foodim, J, Fox, A, Weiss, C. The effect of maternal glucose ingestion (MGI) compared to maternal water ingestion (MWI) on the non stress test (NST). In Scientific Abstracts of the Thirtieth Annual Meeting of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation, March 17–20, 1983 [Abstract 59]. Washington, DC: Society for Gynecologic Investigation, 1983.Google Scholar
Esin, S, Baser, E, Cakir, C, Ustun, Tuncal GN, Kucukozkan, T. Chocolate or orange juice for non-reactive non-stress test (NST) patterns: a randomized prospective controlled study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013; 26: 915–19.Google Scholar
Tveit, JV, Saastad, E, Stray-Pedersen, B, Bordahl, PE, Flenady, V, Fretts, R, Frøen, JF. Reduction of late stillbirth with the introduction of fetal movement information and guidelines – a clinical quality improvement. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009; 9: 32.Google Scholar
Daly, LM, Gardener, G, Bowring, V, Burton, W, Chadha, Y, Ellwood, D, et al. Care of pregnant women with decreased fetal movements: Update of a clinical practice guideline for Australia and New Zealand. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018: 58: 463–8.Google Scholar
Mangesi, L, Hofmeyr, GJ, Smith, V, Smyth, RM. Fetal movement counting for assessment of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 10: Cd004909.Google Scholar
Saastad, E, Winje, BA, Stray-Pedersen, B, Froen, JF. Fetal movement counting improved identification of fetal growth restriction and perinatal outcomes – a multi-centre, randomized, controlled trial. PloS One. 2011; 6: e28482.Google Scholar
Saastad, E, Tveit, JV, Flenady, V, Stray-Pedersen, B, Fretts, R, Bordahl, PE, Frøen, JF. Implementation of uniform information on fetal movement in a Norwegian population reduces delayed reporting of decreased fetal movement and stillbirths in primiparous women – a clinical quality improvement. BMC Res Notes. 2010; 3: 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, J, Heazell, AEP, Rodriguez, A, Weir, CJ, Stock, SJE, Calderwood, CJ, et al. The AFFIRM study: Can promoting awareness of fetal movements and focusing interventions reduce fetal mortality? A stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 218: S603.Google Scholar
The Australian and New Zealand Stillbirth Alliance Research Consortium. My Baby’s Movements: A stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial testing a mobile application intervention aimed at lowering stillbirth rates. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017; 17 (Suppl. 1): 35.Google Scholar
Eichbaum, M, Gast, AS, Sohn, C. Doppler sonography of the fetal middle cerebral artery in the management of massive fetomaternal hemorrhage. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2006; 21: 334–8.Google Scholar
Samadi, R, Greenspoon, JS, Gviazda, I, Settlage, RH, Goodwin, TM. Massive fetomaternal hemorrhage and fetal death: are they predictable? J Perinatol. 1999; 19: 227–9.Google Scholar
Wylie, BJ, D’Alton, ME. Fetomaternal hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 115: 1039–51.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, O, Stephen, G, Martindale, E, Heazell, AE. Predicting poor perinatal outcome in women who present with decreased fetal movements. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009; 29: 705–10.Google Scholar
Scala, C, Bhide, A, Familiari, A, Pagani, G, Khalil, A, Papageorghiou, A, Thilaganathan, B. Number of episodes of reduced fetal movement at term: association with adverse perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213: 678. e1–6.Google Scholar
Warland, J, Dorrian, J, Morrison, JL, O’Brien, LM. Maternal sleep during pregnancy and poor fetal outcomes: A scoping review of the literature with meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev. 2018; 41: 197219.Google Scholar
Stacey, T, Thompson, JMD, Mitchell, EA, Ekeroma, AJ, Zuccollo, JM, McCowan, LME. Association between maternal sleep practices and risk of late stillbirth: a case-control study. BMJ. 2011; 342: d3403.Google Scholar
Humphries, A, Mirjalili, SA, Tarr, GP, Thompson, JMD, Stone, P. The effect of supine positioning on maternal hemodynamics during late pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018: 1–8.Google Scholar
Heazell, A, Li, M, Budd, J, Thompson, J, Stacey, T, Cronin, RS, et al. Association between maternal sleep practices and late stillbirth – findings from a stillbirth case-control study. BJOG. 2018; 125: 254–62.Google Scholar
McCowan, LME, Thompson, JMD, Cronin, RS, Li, M, Stacey, T, Stone, PR, et al. Going to sleep in the supine position is a modifiable risk factor for late pregnancy stillbirth; Findings from the New Zealand multicentre stillbirth case-control study. PloS One. 2017; 12: e0179396.Google Scholar
Tommy’s. (2017). Sleep On Side – a pregnancy campaign https://www.tommys.org/pregnancy-information/sleep-side-pregnancy-campaign.Google Scholar
Sleep on Side (2018). Sleep on side when baby’s inside. Website. https://www.sleeponside.org.nz/.Google Scholar
Tommy’s (22 June 2018). Umamanita DormirDeLado. Online video clip. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLTO1qGp_I0.Google Scholar
Zdravkovic, T, Genbacev, O, McMaster, MT, Fisher, SJ. The adverse effects of maternal smoking on the human placenta: a review. Placenta. 2005; 26 (Suppl. A): S81–6.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, C, O’Mara-Eves, A, Porter, J, Coleman, T, Perlen, SM, Thomas, J, McKenzie, JE. Psychosocial interventions for supporting women to stop smoking in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 2: CD001055.Google Scholar
Mund, M, Louwen, F, Klingelhoefer, D, Gerber, A. Smoking and pregnancy – A review on the first major environmental risk factor of the unborn. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013; 10: 6485–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karumanchi, SA, Levine, RJ. How Does Smoking Reduce the Risk of Preeclampsia? Hypertension. 2010; 55: 1100–1.Google Scholar
Zhang, K, Wang, X. Maternal smoking and increased risk of sudden infant death syndrome: a meta-analysis. Legal Med (Tokyo, Japan). 2013; 15: 115–21.Google Scholar
Hofhuis, W, de Jongste, JC, Merkus, PJFM. Adverse health effects of prenatal and postnatal tobacco smoke exposure on children. Arch Dis Child. 2003; 88: 1086–90.Google Scholar
Khader, M, Bresgen, N, Eckl, PM. Antimutagenic effects of ethanolic extracts from selected Palestinian medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 2010; 127: 319–24.Google Scholar
Tobacco Use and Dependence Guideline Panel. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, 2008.Google Scholar
Coleman, T, Chamberlain, C, Davey, MA, Cooper, SE, Leonardi-Bee, J. Pharmacological interventions for promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 12: Cd010078.Google Scholar
Hunt, R, Davey, M, Anil, S, Kenny, S, Wills, G, Simon, D, Wallace, E. on behalf of the Perinatal Safety and Quality Committee. Victorian Perinatal Services Performance Indicators Report 2016–17. Melbourne: Safer Care Victoria, Victorian Government, 2018.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, CP, Gould, GS, Oncken, C. Management of smoking in pregnant women. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health. 2014; 43: 4651.Google Scholar
Flenady, V, New, K, MacPhail, J. Clinical Practice Guideline Working Party on Smoking Cessation in Pregnancy. Brisbane: Centre for Clinical Studies, Mater Health Services, 2005.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2011). Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy: A Clinician’s Guide to Helping Pregnant Women Quit Smoking. https://www.acog.org/~/media/Departments/Tobacco%20Alcohol%20and%20Substance%20Abuse/SCDP.pdf.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2010). Smoking: stopping in pregnancy and after childbirth. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/PH26.Google Scholar
Widdows, K, Reid, HE, Roberts, SA, Camacho, EM, Heazell, AEP. Saving babies’ lives project impact and results evaluation (SPiRE): a mixed methodology study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018; 18: 43.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×