Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T02:33:32.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Methods of Colloidal Simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2021

Norman J. Wagner
Affiliation:
University of Delaware
Jan Mewis
Affiliation:
KU Leuven, Belgium
Get access

Summary

Methods to simulate colloid suspension structure, dynamics, and rheology are presented and distinguished by whether the solvent is modeled by a continuum or by meso-scale particles, and whether or not a mesh is used. The unmeshed/continuum solvent methods include various forms of Stokesian Dynamics, while the meshed continuum solvent methods include the Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian method and the Immersed Boundary Method. Mesoscopic particles are used on a mesh in the Lattice–Boltzmann (LB) method and are mesh-free in Dissipative Particle Dynamics (DPD). These and other methods are reviewed and guidance provided on which ones are preferred in various situations. For spherical hard particles at high concentrations, without inertia, when accurate treatment of hydrodynamic interactions is needed, versions of Stokesian dynamics set benchmarks for accuracy and efficiency. Other methods become preferable depending on the speed needed for computation, the numbers of particles to be simulated, how well hydrodynamic interactions need to be modeled, whether Brownian motion or particle inertia is important, the shapes and deformability of the particles, the complexity of the flow domain, and whether the solvent is non-Newtonian. Information in this chapter indicates how well the different methods perform in their present state of development.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Stickel, JJ, Powell, RL. Fluid mechanics and rheology of dense suspensions. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. 2005;37:129149.Google Scholar
Ermak, DL, McCammon, JA. Brownian dynamics with hydrodynamic interaction. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1978;69(4):13521360.Google Scholar
Strating, P. Brownian dynamics simulation of a hard-sphere suspension. Physical Review E. 1999;59(2):21752187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, DM, Melrose, JR. Brownian dynamics simulations of model hard-sphere suspensions. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics. 1993;46(1):128.Google Scholar
Van der Werff, JC, de Kruif, CG. Hard-sphere colloidal disperisons – the scaling of rheolgical properties with particle-size, volume fraction, and shear rate. Journal of Rheology. 1989;33(3):421454.Google Scholar
Foffi, G, De Michele, C, Sciortino, F, Tartaglia, P. Arrested phase separation in a short-ranged attractive colloidal system: A numerical study. Journal of Chemical Physics. 2005;122(22):13.Google Scholar
Zia, RN, Landrum, BJ, Russel, WB. A micro-mechanical study of coarsening and rheology of colloidal gels: Cage building, cage hopping, and Smoluchowski’s ratchet. Journal of Rheology. 2014;58(5):11211157.Google Scholar
Durlofsky, L, Brady, JF, Bossis, G. Dynamic simulation of hydrodynamically interacting particles Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1987;180:2149.Google Scholar
Sierou, A, Brady, JF. Accelerated Stokesian dynamics simulations. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2001;448:115146.Google Scholar
Phung, TN, Brady, JF, Bossis, G. Stokesian Dynamics simulation of Brownian suspensions. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1996;313:181207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, NJ, Brady, JF. Shear thickening in colloidal dispersions. Physics Today. 2009;62(10):2732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swan, JW, Brady, JF, Moore, RS, ChE. Modeling hydrodynamic self-propulsion with Stokesian Dynamics. Or teaching Stokesian dynamics to swim. Physics of Fluids. 2011;23(7):19.Google Scholar
Kopp, M, Hofling, F. GPU-accelerated simulation of colloidal suspensions with direct hydrodynamic interactions. European Physical Journal-Special Topics. 2012;210(1):101117.Google Scholar
Cao, XJ, Cummins, HZ, Morris, JF. Hydrodynamic and interparticle potential effects on aggregation of colloidal particles. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2012;368(1):8696.Google Scholar
Drews, AM, Cartier, CA, Bishop, KJM. Contact charge electrophoresis: Experiment and theory. Langmuir. 2015;31(13):38083814.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, DJ, Onishi, Y. Calculation of the resistance and mobility functions for two unequal rigid spheres in low-Reynolds-number flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1984;139:261290.Google Scholar
Kim, S, Karrila, SJ. Microhydrodynamics: Principles and Selected Applications. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1991. xxiii, 507 p.Google Scholar
Mohammadi, M, Larson, ED, Liu, J, Larson, RG. Brownian dynamics simulations of coagulation of dilute uniform and anisotropic particles under shear flow spanning low to high Peclet numbers. Journal of Chemical Physics. 2015;142(2):16.Google Scholar
Weinbaum, S, Ganatos, P, Yan, ZY. Numerical multipole and boundary integral-equation techniques in stokes-flow. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. 1990;22:275316.Google Scholar
Foss, DR, Brady, JF. Structure, diffusion and rheology of Brownian suspensions by Stokesian Dynamics simulation. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2000;407:167200.Google Scholar
Ladd, AJC. Hydrodynamic transport-coefficients of random dispersions of hard-spheres Journal of Chemical Physics. 1990;93(5):34843494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banchio, AJ, Brady, JF. Accelerated Stokesian dynamics: Brownian motion. Journal of Chemical Physics. 2003;118(22):1032310332.Google Scholar
Hockney, RW, Eastwood, JW. Computer Simulation using Particles. Special student ed. Bristol, UK: A. Hilger; 1988. xxi, 540 p.Google Scholar
Zick, AA, Homsy, GM. Stokes-flow through periodic arrays of spheres. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1982;115:1326.Google Scholar
Wang, M, Brady, JF. Spectral Ewald acceleration of Stokesian Dynamics for polydisperse suspensions. Journal of Computational Physics. 2016;306:443477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kutteh, R. Rigid body dynamics approach to Stokesian dynamics simulations of nonspherical particles. Journal of Chemical Physics. 2010;132(17):18.Google Scholar
Ball, RC, Melrose, JR. A simulation technique for many spheres in quasi-static motion under frame-invariant pair drag and Brownian forces. Physica A. 1997;247(1–4):444472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, A, Higdon, JJL. Origins of the anomalous stress behavior in charged colloidal suspensions under shear. Physical Review E. 2010;82(5):7.Google Scholar
Kumar, A, Higdon, JJL. Particle mesh Ewald Stokesian dynamics simulations for suspensions of non-spherical particles. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2011;675:297335.Google Scholar
Beenakker, CWJ. The effective viscosity of a concentrated suspension of spheres (and its relation to diffusion). Physica A. 1984;128(1–2):4881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolintineanu, DS, Grest, GS, Lechman, JB, Pierce, F, Plimpton, SJ, Schunk, PR. Particle dynamics modeling methods for colloid suspensions. Computational Particle Mechanics. 2014;1(3):321356.Google Scholar
Bybee, MD. Hydrodynamic Simulation of Colloidal Gels: Microstructure, Dynamics and Rheology [PhD]. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champagne; 2009.Google Scholar
Schunk, PR, Pierce, F, Lechman, JB, Grillet, AM, Veld, PJI, Weiss, H, et al. Performance of mesoscale modeling methods for predicting rheological properties of charged polystyrene/water suspensions. Journal of Rheology. 2012;56(2):353384.Google Scholar
Melrose, JR, Ball, RC. The pathological behavior of sheared hard-spheres with hydrodynamic interactions. Europhysics Letters. 1995;32(6):535540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seto, R, Mari, R, Morris, JF, Denn, MM. Discontinuous shear thickening of frictional hard-sphere suspensions. Physical Review Letters. 2013;111(21):5.Google Scholar
Mari, R, Seto, R, Morris, JF, Denn, MM. Shear thickening, frictionless and frictional rheologies in non-Brownian suspensions. Journal of Rheology. 2014;58(6):16931724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youngren, GK, Acrivos, A. Stokes flow past a particle of arbitrary shape – numerical-method of solution. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1975;69(MAY27):377403.Google Scholar
Ramanujan, S, Pozrikidis, C. Deformation of liquid capsules enclosed by elastic membranes in simple shear flow: Large deformations and the effect of fluid viscosities. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1998;361:117143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lac, E, Morel, A, Barthes-Biesel, D. Hydrodynamic interaction between two identical capsules in simple shear flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2007;573:149169.Google Scholar
Pozrikidis, C. Numerical simulation of cell motion in tube flow. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2005;33(2):165178.Google Scholar
Ishikawa, T, Simmonds, MP, Pedley, TJ. Hydrodynamic interaction of two swimming model micro-organisms. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2006;568:119160.Google Scholar
Zhao, H, Shaqfeh, ESG, Narsimhan, V. Shear-induced particle migration and margination in a cellular suspension. Physics of Fluids. 2012;24(1):21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishikawa, T, Pedley, TJ. The rheology of a semi-dilute suspension of swimming model micro-organisms. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2007;588:399435.Google Scholar
Bao, YX, Rachh, M, Keaveny, EE, Greengard, L, Donev, A. A fluctuating boundary integral method for Brownian suspensions. Journal of Computational Physics. 2018;374:10941119.Google Scholar
Swan, JW, Wang, G. Rapid calculation of hydrodynamic and transport properties in concentrated solutions of colloidal particles and macromolecules. Physics of Fluids. 2016;28(1):20.Google Scholar
Maxey, MR, Patel, BK. Localized force representations for particles sedimenting in Stokes flow. International Journal of Multiphase Flow. 2001;27(9):16031626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, HH. Direct simulation of flows of solid-liquid mixtures. International Journal of Multiphase Flow. 1996;22(2):335352.Google Scholar
Hu, HH, Patankar, NA, Zhu, MY. Direct numerical simulations of fluid-solid systems using the arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian technique. Journal of Computational Physics. 2001;169(2):427462.Google Scholar
Trofa, M, Vocciante, M, D’Avino, G, Hulsen, MA, Greco, F, Maffettone, PL. Numerical simulations of the competition between the effects of inertia and viscoelasticity on particle migration in Poiseuille flow. Computers & Fluids. 2015;107:214223.Google Scholar
Choi, YJ, Hulsen, MA, Meijer, HEH. An extended finite element method for the simulation of particulate viscoelastic flows. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics. 2010;165(11–12):607624.Google Scholar
Luo, X, Maxey, MR, Karniadakis, GE. Smoothed profile method for particulate flows: Error analysis and simulations. Journal of Computational Physics. 2009;228(5):17501769.Google Scholar
Lomholt, S, Maxey, MR. Force-coupling method for particulate two-phase flow: Stokes flow. Journal of Computational Physics. 2003;184(2):381405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, D, Maxey, M, Karniadakis, GE. A fast method for particulate microflows. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems. 2002;11(6):691702.Google Scholar
Liu, D, Maxey, M, Karniadakis, GE. FCM-spectral element method for simulating colloidal micro-devices. Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics. 2003;1–2:14131416.Google Scholar
Yeo, K, Maxey, MR. Simulation of concentrated suspensions using the force-coupling method. Journal of Computational Physics. 2010;229(6):24012421.Google Scholar
Dance, SL, Maxey, MR. Particle density stratification in transient sedimentation. Physical Review E. 2003;68(3):11.Google Scholar
Krieger, IM, Dougherty, TJ. A mechanism for non-Newtonian flow in suspensions of rigid spheres. Transactions of the Society of Rheology. 1959;3(1):137152.Google Scholar
Batchelor, GK, Green, JT. Determination of bulk stress in a suspension of spherical-particles to order C-2. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1972;56:401427.Google Scholar
Ladd, AJC, Frenkel, D. Dissipative hydrodynamic interactions via lattice-gas cellular automata Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics. 1990;2(11):19211924.Google Scholar
Glowinski, R, Pan, TW, Hesla, TI, Joseph, DD. A distributed Lagrange multiplier fictitious domain method for particulate flows. International Journal of Multiphase Flow. 1999;25(5):755794.Google Scholar
Glowinski, R, Pan, TW, Hesla, TI, Joseph, DD, Periaux, J. A fictitious domain approach to the direct numerical simulation of incompressible viscous flow past moving rigid bodies: Application to particulate flow. Journal of Computational Physics. 2001;169(2):363426.Google Scholar
Patankar, NA, Singh, P, Joseph, DD, Glowinski, R, Pan, TW. A new formulation of the distributed Lagrange multiplier/fictitious domain method for particulate flows. International Journal of Multiphase Flow. 2000;26(9):15091524.Google Scholar
Gallier, S, Lemaire, E, Lobry, L, Peters, F. A fictitious domain approach for the simulation of dense suspensions. Journal of Computational Physics. 2014;256:367387.Google Scholar
Hao, J, Pan, TW, Glowinski, R, Joseph, DD. A fictitious domain/distributed Lagrange multiplier method for the particulate flow of Oldroyd-B fluids: A positive definiteness preserving approach. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics. 2009;156(1–2):95111.Google Scholar
Wachs, A. A DEM-DLM/FD method for direct numerical simulation of particulate flows: Sedimentation of polygonal isometric particles in a Newtonian fluid with collisions. Computers & Fluids. 2009;38(8):16081628.Google Scholar
Shi, X, Phan-Thien, N. Distributed Lagrange multiplier/fictitious domain method in the framework of lattice Boltzmann method for fluid structure interactions. Journal of Computational Physics. 2005;206:8194.Google Scholar
Peskin, CS. Flow patterns around heart valves–numerical method. Journal of Computational Physics. 1972;10(2):252.Google Scholar
Peskin, CS. Numerical analysis of blood-flow in heart Journal of Computational Physics. 1977;25(3):220252.Google Scholar
Fogelson, AL, Peskin, CS. A fast numerical-method for solving the 3-dimensional Stokes equations in the presence of suspended particles. Journal of Computational Physics. 1988;79(1):5069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyer, RP, Leveque, RJ. Analysis of a one-dimensional model for the immersed boundary method. SIAM Journal of Numerical Analysis. 1992;29(2):332364.Google Scholar
Delong, S, Usabiaga, FB, Delgado-Buscalioni, R, Griffith, BE, Donev, A. Brownian dynamics without Green’s functions. Journal of Chemical Physics. 2014;140(13):23.Google Scholar
Landau, LD, Lifshit︠s︡, EM. Fluid Mechanics, 2nd ed. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1987. xiii, 539 p.Google Scholar
Ladd, AJC, Gang, H, Zhu, JX, Weitz, DA. Temporal and spatial dependence of hydrodynamic correlations–simulation and experiment Physical Review E. 1995;52(6):65506572.Google Scholar
Vowinckel, B, Kempe, T, Frohlich, J. Fluid-particle interaction in turbulent open channel flow with fully-resolved mobile beds. Advances in Water Resources. 2014;72:3244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, ZG, Musong, SG. Direct numerical simulation of heat and mass transfer of spheres in a fluidized bed. Powder Technology. 2014;262:6270.Google Scholar
Zhou, Q, Fan, LS. A second-order accurate immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method for particle-laden flows. Journal of Computational Physics. 2014;268:269301.Google Scholar
Kruger, T, Kaoui, B, Harting, J. Interplay of inertia and deformability on rheological properties of a suspension of capsules. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2014;751:725745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deen, NG, Peters, E, Padding, JT, Kuipers, JAM. Review of direct numerical simulation of fluid–particle mass, momentum and heat transfer in dense gas-solid flows. Chemical Engineering Science. 2014;116:710724.Google Scholar
Tanaka, H, Araki, T. Simulation method of colloidal suspensions with hydrodynamic interactions: Fluid particle dynamics. Physical Review Letters. 2000;85(6):13381341.Google Scholar
Marth, W, Aland, S, Voigt, A. Margination of white blood cells: A computational approach by a hydrodynamic phase field model. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2016;790:18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araki, T, Tanaka, H. Colloidal aggregation in a nematic liquid crystal: Topological arrest of particles by a single-stroke disclination line. Physical Review Letters. 2006;97(12):127801.Google Scholar
Furukawa, A, Marenduzzo, D, Cates, ME. Activity-induced clustering in model dumbbell swimmers: The role of hydrodynamic interactions. Physical Review E. 2014;90(2):16.Google Scholar
Nakayama, Y, Yamamoto, R. Simulation method to resolve hydrodynamic interactions in colloidal dispersions. Physical Review E. 2005;71(3):7.Google Scholar
Nakayama, Y, Kim, K, Yamamoto, R. Simulating (electro) hydrodynamic effects in colloidal dispersions: Smoothed profile method. European Physical Journal E. 2008;26(4):361368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molina, JJ, Otomura, K, Shiba, H, Kobayashi, H, Sano, M, Yamamoto, R. Rheological evaluation of colloidal dispersions using the smoothed profile method: Formulation and applications. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2016;792:590619.Google Scholar
Sharma, N, Patankar, NA. Direct numerical simulation of the Brownian motion of particles by using fluctuating hydrodynamic equations. Journal of Computational Physics. 2004;201(2):466486.Google Scholar
Ladd, AJC. Numerical simulations of particulate suspensions via a discretized Boltzmann-equation. 1. Theoretical foundation. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1994;271:285309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, AJC, Verberg, R. Lattice-Boltzmann simulations of particle-fluid suspensions. Journal of Statistical Physics. 2001;104(5–6):11911251.Google Scholar
Monaghan, JJ. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 1992;30(1):543574.Google Scholar
Monaghan, JJ. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Reports on Progress in Physics. 2005;68(8):17031759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover, WG. Smooth Particle Applied Mechanics: The State of the Art. Singapore: World Scientific; 2006. xiii, 300 p.Google Scholar
Li, S, Liu, WK. Meshfree Particle Methods. Berlin: Springer; 2004. iii, 502 p.Google Scholar
Bian, X, Litvinov, S, Qian, R, Ellero, M, Adams, NA. Multiscale modeling of particle in suspension with smoothed dissipative particle dynamics. Physics of Fluids. 2012;24(1):20.Google Scholar
Vazquez-Quesada, A, Bian, X, Ellero, M. Three-dimensional simulations of dilute and concentrated suspensions using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Computational Particle Mechanics. 2016;3(2):167178.Google Scholar
Harting, J, Frijters, S, Ramaioli, M, Robinson, M, Wolf, DE, Luding, S. Recent advances in the simulation of particle-laden flows. European Physical Journal-Special Topics. 2014;223(11):22532267.Google Scholar
Español, P, Revenga, M. Smoothed dissipative particle dynamics. Physical Review E. 2003;67(2):12.Google Scholar
Bian, X, Litvinov, S, Ellero, M, Wagner, NJ. Hydrodynamic shear thickening of particulate suspension under confinement. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics. 2014;213:3949.Google Scholar
Belytschko, T, Lu, YY, Gu, L. Element-free Galerkin methods. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 1994;37(2):229256.Google Scholar
Liu, WK, Jun, S, Zhang, YF. Reproducing kernel particle methods. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids. 1995;20(8–9):10811106.Google Scholar
Onate, E, Idelsohn, S, Zienkiewicz, OC, Taylor, RL. A finite point method in computational mechanics. Applications to convective transport and fluid flow. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 1996;39(22):38393866.Google Scholar
Hoogerbrugge, PJ, Koelman, J. Simulating microscopic hydrodynamic phenomena with dissipative particle dynamics. Europhysics Letters. 1992;19(3):155160.Google Scholar
Español, P, Warren, P. Statistical-mechanics of dissipative particle dynamics. Europhysics Letters. 1995;30(4):191196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groot, RD, Warren, PB. Dissipative particle dynamics: Bridging the gap between atomistic and mesoscopic simulation. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1997;107(11):44234435.Google Scholar
Liu, MB, Liu, GR, Zhou, LW, Chang, JZ. Dissipative particle dynamics (DPD): An overview and recent developments. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering. 2015;22(4):529556.Google Scholar
Koelman, J, Hoogerbrugge, PJ. Dynamic simulation of hard-sphere suspensions under shear Europhysics Letters. 1993;21(3):363368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mai-Duy, N, Pan, D, Phan-Thien, N, Khoo, BC. Dissipative particle dynamics modeling of low Reynolds number incompressible flows. Journal of Rheology. 2013;57(2):585604.Google Scholar
Huang, Y, Marson, RL, Larson, RG. Inertial migration of a rigid sphere in plane Poiseuille flow as a test of dissipative particle dynamics simulations. Journal of Chemical Physics. 2018;149(16):17.Google Scholar
Marsh, CA, Backx, G, Ernst, MH. Static and dynamic properties of dissipative particle dynamics. Physical Review E. 1997;56(2):16761691.Google Scholar
Pan, WX, Caswell, B, Karniadakis, GE. Rheology, microstructure and migration in Brownian colloidal suspensions. Langmuir. 2010;26(1):133142.Google Scholar
Whittle, M, Travis, KP. Dynamic simulations of colloids by core-modified dissipative particle dynamics. Journal of Chemical Physics. 2010;132(12):16.Google Scholar
Jamali, S, Boromand, A, Wagner, N, Maia, J. Microstructure and rheology of soft to rigid shear-thickening colloidal suspensions. Journal of Rheology. 2015;59(6):13771395.Google Scholar
Boromand, A, Jamali, S, Grove, B, Maia, JM. A generalized frictional and hydrodynamic model of the dynamics and structure of dense colloidal suspensions. Journal of Rheology. 2018;62(4):905918.Google Scholar
Royer, JR, Blair, DL, Hudson, SD. Rheological signature of frictional interactions in shear thickening suspensions. Physical Review Letters. 2016;116(18):5.Google Scholar
Cwalina, CD, Wagner, NJ. Material properties of the shear-thickened state in concentrated near hard-sphere colloidal dispersions. Journal of Rheology. 2014;58(4):949967.Google Scholar
Boek, ES, Coveney, PV, Lekkerkerker, HNW, vanderSchoot, P. Simulating the rheology of dense colloidal suspensions using dissipative particle dynamics. Physical Review E. 1997;55(3):31243133.Google Scholar
Martys, NS. Study of a dissipative particle dynamics based approach for modeling suspensions. Journal of Rheology. 2005;49(2):401424.Google Scholar
Huang, YD, Marson, RL, Larson, RG. Inertial migration of neutrally buoyant prolate and oblate spheroids in plane Poiseuille flow using dissipative particle dynamics simulations. Computational Materials Science. 2019;162:178185.Google Scholar
Marson, RL, Huang, YD, Huang, M, Fu, TT, Larson, RG. Inertio-capillary cross-streamline drift of droplets in Poiseuille flow using dissipative particle dynamics simulations. Soft Matter. 2018;14(12):22672280.Google Scholar
Malevanets, A, Kapral, R. Mesoscopic model for solvent dynamics. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1999;110(17):86058613.Google Scholar
Ihle, T, Kroll, DM. Stochastic rotation dynamics. I. Formalism, Galilean invariance, and Green-–Kubo relations. Physical Review E. 2003;67(6):11.Google Scholar
Gompper, G, Ihle, T, Kroll, DM, Winkler, RG. Multi-particle collision dynamics: A particle-based mesoscale simulation approach to the hydrodynamics of complex fluids. In: Holm, C, Kremer, K (eds.) Advanced Computer Simulation Approaches for Soft Matter Sciences III. Advances in Polymer Science, vol. 221. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2009. pp. 187.Google Scholar
Zhao, TY, Wang, XG, Jiang, L, Larson, RG. Assessment of mesoscopic particle-based methods in microfluidic geometries. Journal of Chemical Physics. 2013;139(8):10.Google Scholar
Padding, JT, Louis, AA. Hydrodynamic interactions and Brownian forces in colloidal suspensions: Coarse-graining over time and length scales. Physical Review E. 2006;74(3):29.Google Scholar
Ripoll, M, Winkler, RG, Mussawisade, K, Gompper, G. Mesoscale hydrodynamics simulations of attractive rod-like colloids in shear flow. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2008;20(40):11.Google Scholar
Padding, JT, Louis, AA. Interplay between hydrodynamic and Brownian fluctuations in sedimenting colloidal suspensions. Physical Review E. 2008;77(1):11.Google Scholar
Frisch, U, Hasslacher, B, Pomeau, Y. Lattice-gas automata for the Navier–Stokes equation. Physical Review Letters. 1986;56(14):15051508.Google Scholar
Dunweg, B, Schiller, UD, Ladd, AJC. Statistical mechanics of the fluctuating lattice Boltzmann equation. Physical Review E. 2007;76(3):10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunweg, B, Ladd, AJC. Lattice Boltzmann simulations of soft matter systems. In Holm, C, Kremer, K (eds.) Advanced Computer Simulation Approaches for Soft Matter Sciences III. Advances in Polymer Science, vol. 221. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2009. pp. 89166.Google Scholar
Succi, S. The Lattice Boltzmann Equation for Fluid Dynamics and Beyond. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 2001. xvi, 288 p.Google Scholar
Li, Q, Luo, KH, Kang, QJ, He, YL, Chen, Q, Liu, Q. Lattice Boltzmann methods for multiphase flow and phase-change heat transfer. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 2016;52:62105.Google Scholar
Lallemand, P, Luo, LS. Theory of the lattice Boltzmann method: Dispersion, dissipation, isotropy, Galilean invariance, and stability. Physical Review E. 2000;61(6):65466562.Google Scholar
Ladd, AJC. Numerical simulations of particulate suspensions via a discretized Boltzmann-equation. 2. Numerical results. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1994;271:311339.Google Scholar
Adhikari, R, Stratford, K, Cates, ME, Wagner, AJ. Fluctuating lattice Boltzmann. Europhysics Letters. 2005;71(3):473479.Google Scholar
Ahlrichs, P, Dunweg, B. Lattice-Boltzmann simulation of polymer-solvent systems. International Journal of Modern Physics C. 1998;9(8):14291438.Google Scholar
Ahlrichs, P, Dunweg, B. Simulation of a single polymer chain in solution by combining lattice Boltzmann and molecular dynamics. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1999;111(17):82258239.Google Scholar
Peskin, CS. The immersed boundary method. Acta Numerica. 2002;11:479517.Google Scholar
Nash, RW, Adhikari, R, Cates, ME. Singular forces and pointlike colloids in lattice Boltzmann hydrodynamics. Physical Review E. 2008;77(2):11.Google Scholar
Phillips, TN, Roberts, GW. Lattice Boltzmann models for non-Newtonian flows. IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics. 2011;76(5):790816.Google Scholar
Papenkort, S, Voigtmann, T. Channel flow of a tensorial shear-thinning Maxwell model: Lattice Boltzmann simulations. Journal of Chemical Physics. 2014;140(16):13.Google Scholar
Ladd, AJC. Lattice-Boltzmann methods for suspensions of solid particles. Molecular Physics. 2015;113(17–18):25312537.Google Scholar
Hashemi, Z, Rahnama, M, Jafari, S. Lattice Boltzmann simulation of healthy and defective red blood cell settling in blood plasma. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering–Transactions of the ASME. 2016;138(5):10.Google Scholar
Sun, DK, Wang, Y, Dong, AP, Sun, BD. A three-dimensional quantitative study on the hydrodynamic focusing of particles with the immersed boundary – Lattice Boltzmann method. International Journal of Heat Mass Transfer. 2016;94:306315.Google Scholar
Leonardi, A, Cabrera, M, Wittel, FK, Kaitna, R, Mendoza, M, Wu, W, et al. Granular-front formation in free-surface flow of concentrated suspensions. Physical Review E. 2015;92(5):13.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×