Book contents
- Animal Ethics in Animal Research
- Animal Ethics in Animal Research
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on the Authors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Research Ethics
- 2 The Ethical Perspective
- 3 The 3Rs and Good Scientific Practice
- 4 Applying Ethical Thinking and Social Relevance
- 5 Regulation and Legislation: Overview and Background
- 6 Public Involvement: How and Why?
- 7 The Future of Animal Research: Guesstimates on Technical and Ethical Developments
- Index
- References
4 - Applying Ethical Thinking and Social Relevance
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 October 2017
Book contents
- Animal Ethics in Animal Research
- Animal Ethics in Animal Research
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on the Authors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Research Ethics
- 2 The Ethical Perspective
- 3 The 3Rs and Good Scientific Practice
- 4 Applying Ethical Thinking and Social Relevance
- 5 Regulation and Legislation: Overview and Background
- 6 Public Involvement: How and Why?
- 7 The Future of Animal Research: Guesstimates on Technical and Ethical Developments
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Animal Ethics in Animal Research , pp. 41 - 67Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Chassaing, B. Koren, O. Goodrich, J.K. Poole, A.C. Srinivasan, S. Ley, R.E. & Gewirtz, A.T. (2015). Dietary emulsifiers impact the mouse gut microbiota promoting colitis and metabolic syndrome. Nature, 519: 92–96.Google Scholar
Dortmans, J.C.F.M. Venema-Kemper, S. Peeters, B.P.H. & Koch, G. (2014). Field vaccinated chickens with low antibody titres show equally insufficient protection against matching and non-matching genotypes of virulent Newcastle disease virus. Veterinary Microbiology, 172: 100–107.Google Scholar
Grimm, H. (2014). Ethics in laboratory animal science. In Jensen-Jarolim, E. (ed.), Comparative medicine (pp. 281–230). Wien: Springer.Google Scholar
Kageyama, S. Hirayama, H. Moriyasu, S. & Minamihashi, A. (2015). Genetic diagnosis of band 3 deficiency using a quenching probe (QProbe)-PCR assay in bovine embryos. Japanese Journal of Veterinary Research, 63: 45–51.Google Scholar
Richer, L.M. Brisson, D. Melo, R. Ostfeld, R.S. Zeidner, N. & Gomes-Solecki, M. (2014). Reservoir targeted vaccine against borrelia burgdorferi: A new strategy to prevent lyme disease transmission. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 209: 1972–1980.Google Scholar
Scarabelot, V.L. Cavagni, J. Medeiros, L.F. Detânico, B. Rozisky, J.R. de Souza, A. Daudt, L.D. Gaio, E.J. Ferreira, M.B.C. Rösing, C.K. Battastini, A.M.O. & Torres, I.L.S. (2014). Periodontal disease and high doses of inhaled corticosteroids alter NTPDase activity in the blood serum of rats. Archives of Oral Biology, 59: 841–847.Google Scholar
Theiss-Suennemann, J. Jörß, K. Messmann, J.J. Reichardt, S.D. Montes-Cobos, E. Lühder, F. Tuckermann, J.P. Awolff, H. Dressel, R. Gröne, H-J. Strauß, G. & Reichardt, H.M. (2015). Glucocorticoids attenuate acute graft-versus-host disease by suppressing the cytotoxic capacity of CD8+ T cells. The Journal of Pathology, 235: 646–655.Google Scholar
van Reenen, C.G. (2009). Assessing the welfare of transgenic farm animals. In Engelhard, M., Hagen, K. & Boysen, M. (eds.), Genetic engineering in livestock. New applications and interdisciplinary perspectives. Ethics of science and technology assessment, vol 34. (pp. 119–143). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Vieira de Castro, A.C. Olsson, I.A. (2015). Does the goal justify the methods? Harm and benefit in neuroscience research using animals. Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, 19: 47–78.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by