Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 September 2020
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Calcidius on Plato's TimaeusGreek Philosophy, Latin Reception, and Christian Contexts, pp. 221 - 232Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Abbate, M. 2002. “Non-dicibilità del ‘Primo Dio’ e via remotionis nel cap. X del Didaskalikos,” in Calabi, F. (ed.), Arrhetos Theos: L’ineffabilità del primo principio nel medio platonismo (Pisa: ETS), pp. 55–75.Google Scholar
Alessandrelli, M. 2013. “Cleante e Crisippo sul rapporto tra provvidenza e fato a proposito di Calc., in Plat. Tim. 144,” in Masi, F. G. and Maso, S. (eds.), Fate, Chance, and Fortune in Ancient Thought (Amsterdam: Hakkert), pp. 145–157.Google Scholar
Alexandre, M. 1976. “L’exégèse de Gen. 1, 1-2a dans l’In Hexaemeron de Grégoire de Nysse: deux approches du problème de la matière,” in Dörrie, H., Altenburger, M., and Schramm, U. (eds.), Gregor von Nyssa und die Philosophie (Leiden: Brill), pp. 159–192.Google Scholar
Arnim, H. F. A. von. 1903–1924. Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta. 4 vols. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Bakhouche, B. 1990. “Le difficile commentaire du Timée 38D par Calcidius,” Pallas 36: 133–144.Google Scholar
Bakhouche, B. 2003. “Éternité et temps dans le Commentaire au Timée de Calcidius,” Latomus 279: 10–19.Google Scholar
Bakhouche, B. 2006. “La définition aristotélicienne de l’âme dans quelques textes latins: endelecheia ou entelecheia,” Interférences Ars Scribendi 4. http://ars-scribendi.ens-lsh.fr/article.php3?id_article=45&var_affichage=vf.Google Scholar
Bakhouche, B. 2011. (ed., trans., and notes) Calcidius, Commentaire au Timée de Platon, édition critique et traduction. 2 vols. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Bakhouche, B. 2013. “Éléments de cosmologie aristotélicienne dans le Commentaire au Timée de Calcidius (IVe s.),” in Lehmann, Y. (ed.), Aristoteles Romanus: La réception de la science aristotélicienne dans l’empire gréco-romain (Turnhout: Brepols), pp. 371–387.Google Scholar
Bakhouche, B. 2014. “Calcidius (In Tim. chap. 276–278), or scripture in the service of philosophical exegesis,” in Aufrère, S. H., Alexander, P. S., and Pleše, Z., (eds.), On the Fringe of Commentary: Metatextuality in Ancient Near Eastern and Ancient Mediterranean Cultures (Leuven: Peeters), pp. 345–359.Google Scholar
Bakhouche, B. 2015. “Le dualisme en question dans le Commentaire au Timée de Calcidius: Réponse à Gretchen Reydams-Schils,” Chôra: Revue d’études anciennes et médiévales 13: 247–258.Google Scholar
Bakhouche, B. 2018. “Les Hebraica dans le Commentaire au Timée de Calcidius,” in Guillaumin, J.-B. and Lévy, C. (eds.), Plato Latinus. Aspects de la transmission de Platon en latin dans l’Antiquité (Turnhout: Brepols), pp. 207–232.Google Scholar
Baltes, M. 1976–1978. Die Weltentstehung des platonischen Timaios nach den antiken Interpreten. 2 vols. Philosophia Antiqua 30 and 35. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Baltes, M. 1996. “Γέγονεν (Platon, Tim. 28B7): Ist die Welt real entstanden oder nicht?” in Algra, K., van der Horst, P., and Runia, D. (eds.), Polyhistor: Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy (Leiden: Brill), pp. 76–96.Google Scholar
Baltes, M. and Dörrie, H. (eds. and trans.) 1993. Der Platonismus in der Antike. Grundlagen – System – Entwicklung. Band 3: Der Platonismus im 2. und 3. Jahrhundert nach Christus, Bausteine 73–100: Text, Übersetzung, Kommentar. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Baltes, M. and Dörrie, H. 1996. Der Platonismus in der Antike. Grundlagen – System – Entwicklung. Band 4: Die philosophische Lehre des Platonismus. Einige grundlegende Axiome/Platonische Physik (im antiken Verständnis) I, Bausteine 101–124: Text, Übersetzung, Kommentar. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Baltes, M. and Dörrie, H. 1998. Der Platonismus in der Antike. Grundlagen – System – Entwicklung. Band 5: Die philosophische Lehre des Platonismus. Platonische Physik (im antiken Verständnis) II, Bausteine 125–150: Text, Übersetzung, Kommentar. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Baltes, M. and Dörrie, H. 2002. Der Platonismus in der Antike. Grundlagen – System – Entwicklung. Band 6.2: Die philosophische Lehre des Platonismus: von der “Seele” als der Ursache aller sinnvollen Abläufe, Bausteine 169-181: Text, Übersetzung, Kommentar. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Beatrice, P. F. 1999. “Ein Origeneszitat im Timaioskommentar des Calcidius,” in Bienert, W. A. and Kühneweg, U. (eds.), Origeniana Septima: Origenes in den Auseinandersetzungen des 4. Jahrhunderts, BETL 137 (Leuven: University Press-Peeters), pp. 75–90.Google Scholar
Benz, E. 1932. Marius Victorinus und die Entwicklung der abendländischen Willensmetaphysik. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Bergjan, S.-P. 2002. Der fürsorgende Gott: Der Begriff der ΠΡΟΝΟΙΑ Gottes in der apologetischen Literatur der Alten Kirche. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bertolini, M. 1990. “Aspetti letterari del Commentarius di Calcidio al Timeo,” Koinonia 14: 89–112.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. 1998. Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. 1999. “Chrysippus’ theory of causes,” in Ierodiakonou, K. (ed.), Topics in Stoic Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 196–242.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. 2014. “Middle Platonists on fate and human autonomy: A confrontation with the Stoics,” in Destrée, P., Salles, R., and Zingano, M. (eds.), What Is Up to Us? Studies on Agency and Responsibility in Ancient Philosophy (Sankt Augustin: Academia), pp. 283–293.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. R. 2001. Post-Hellenistic Philosophy: A Study of Its Development from the Stoics to Origen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. R. 2007. “Middle Platonists on fate and human autonomy,” in Sharples, R. W. and Sorabji, R. (eds.), Greek and Roman Philosophy 100 BC–200 AD, vol. 2 (London: Institute of Classical Studies), pp. 431–447.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. R. 2016. “Providence and religion in Middle Platonism,” in Eidinow, E., Kindt, J., and Osborne, R. (eds.), Theologies of Ancient Greek Religion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 317–338.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. R. (ed. and trans.) 2018. Platonist Philosophy, 80 BC to AD 250: An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. 2002. “Le démiurge du Timée et le créateur de la Genèse,” in Canto-Sperber, M. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Le style de la pensée. Recueil de textes en hommage à Jacques Brunschwig (Paris: Les Belles Lettres), pp. 25–39.Google Scholar
Broadie, S. 2012. Nature and Divinity in Plato’s Timaeus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bryan, J. 2013. “Chrysippus and Plato on the fragility of the head,” in Long, A. G. (ed.), Plato and the Stoics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 59–79.Google Scholar
Bychkov, O. V. 1995. “Note on Calcidius: Plato, Timaeus 35b1-3,” Mnemosyne 4th ser. 48: 208–210.Google Scholar
Charlton, W. (trans.) 1970. Aristotle’s Physics. Books 1 and 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. 2005. “L’anima et la mistione stoica. Enn. IV 7 [2], 8,” Elenchos 42: 127–147.Google Scholar
Colish, M. 1990. The Stoic Tradition from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages. 2nd edn. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Cornford, F. M. 1937. Plato’s Cosmology: The Timaeus of Plato translated with a running commentary. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Courcelle, P. 1973. “Ambroise de Milan et Calcidius,” in van der Nat, P. G., Sicking, C. M. J., den Boer, W., and van Winden, J. C. M. (eds.), Romanitas et Christianitas: Studia I. H. Waszink … oblata (Amsterdam: North-Holland), pp. 45–53.Google Scholar
Curtius, E. R. 1948. Europäische Literatur und lateinisches Mittelalter. Bern: A. Francke.Google Scholar
DelCogliano, M. 2012. “Tradition and polemic in Basil of Caesarea’s homily on the theophany,” Vigiliae Christianae 66: 30–55.Google Scholar
den Boeft, J. 1970. Calcidius on Fate: His Doctrine and Sources. Philosophia Antiqua 18. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
den Boeft, J. 1977. Calcidius on Demons (Commentarius 127–136). Philosophia Antiqua 33. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
des Places, É. (ed. and trans.) 1973. Numénius, Fragments, texte établi et traduit. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Deuse, W. 1983. Untersuchungen zur mittelplatonischen und neuplatonischen Seelenlehre. Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Mainz. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Deuse, W. 1997. “Der Demiurg bei Porphyrios und Jamblich,” in Zintzen, C. (ed.), Die Philosophie des Neuplatonismus (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft), pp. 238–278.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. 1977. The Middle Platonists, 80 BC to AD 220. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. 1999. “A case-study in commentary: The Neoplatonic exegesis of the Prooimia of Plato’s dialogues,” in Most, G. W. (ed.), Commentaries–Kommentare, Aporemata 4 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht), pp. 206–222.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. 1928. “The Parmenides of Plato and the origins of the Neoplatonic One,” Classical Quarterly 22: 129–143.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. 1960. “Numenius and Ammonius,” in Les sources de Plotin: dix exposés et discussions (Geneva: Fondation Hardt), pp. 3–32.Google Scholar
Donini, P. 1988. “La Connaissance de dieu et la hiérarchie divine chez Albinos,” in van den Broek, R., Baarda, T., and Mansfeld, J. (eds.), Knowledge of God in the Graeco-Roman World (Leiden: Brill), pp. 118–131.Google Scholar
Dorfbauer, L. J. 2011. “Favonius Eulogius, der früheste Leser des Calcidius?” Hermes 139: 376–394.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. 1957. “Kontroversen um die Seelenwanderung im kaiserzeitlichen Platonismus,” Hermes 85: 414–435.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. 1959. Porphyrios’ “Symmikta zetemata”: ihre Stellung in System und Geschichte des Neuplatonismus, nebst einem Kommentar zu den Fragmenten. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. 1975. “Logos-Religion? Oder Noûs-Theologie? Die hauptsächlichen Aspekte des kaiserzeitlichen Platonismus,” in Mansfeld, J. and De Rijk, L. M. (eds.), Kephalaion: Studies in Greek Philosophy and Its Continuation Offered to Professor C.J. De Vogel (Assen: Van Gorcum), pp. 115–136.Google Scholar
Dragona-Monachou, M. 1973. “Providence and fate in Stoicism and Pre-Neoplatonism: Calcidius as an authority on Cleanthes’ theodicy,” Philosophia 3: 262–306.Google Scholar
Dronke, P. 2008. The Spell of Calcidius: Platonic Concepts and Images in the Medieval West. Florence: SISMEL, Edizioni del Galluzo.Google Scholar
Dutton, P. 2003. “Medieval approaches to Calcidius,” in Reydams-Schils, G. (ed.), Plato’s Timaeus as Cultural Icon (University of Notre Dame Press), pp. 183–205.Google Scholar
Eastwood, B. S. 2007. Ordering the Heavens: Roman Astronomy and Cosmology in the Carolingian Renaissance. History of Science and Medicine Library 4. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. J. 1990. “Atticizing Moses? Numenius, the Fathers and the Jews,” Vigiliae Christianae 44: 64–75.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. J. 2015. Religions of the Constantinian Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Emilsson, E. K. 1994. “Platonic soul-body dualism in the early centuries of the Empire to Plotinus,” in Haase, W. and Temporini, H. (eds.), ANRW II.36.7 (Berlin: de Gruyter), pp. 5331–5362.Google Scholar
Erismann, C. 2016. “Aristoteles Latinus: The reception of Aristotle in the Latin world,” in Falcon, A. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity (Leiden: Brill), pp. 439–459.Google Scholar
Falcon, A. (ed.) 2016. Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. and Baldi, L.. (ed. and trans.) 2002. Plutarco. La generazione dell’anima nel Timeo. Introduzione, testo critico, traduzione e commento. Naples: D’Auria.Google Scholar
Festugière, A. J. 1966–1968 (trans.). Proclus, Commentaire sur le Timée, traduction et notes. 5 vols. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Festugière, A. J. 1971. “L’ordre de lecture des dialogues de Platon aux Ve/VIe siècles,” in Études de philosophie grecque (Paris: Vrin), pp. 535–550 (=1969. Museum Helveticum 26: 281–296).Google Scholar
Finamore, J. F. and Dillon, J. M. (ed. and trans.) 2002. Iamblichus, De anima: Text, Translation, and Commentary. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Frede, M. 1987. “Numenius,” in Haase, W. and Temporini, H. (eds.), ANRW II.36.2 (Berlin: de Gruyter), pp. 1034–1075.Google Scholar
Galonnier, A. 2009. “Cosmogenèse et chronocentrisme chez Calcidius,” Philosophie Antique 9: 189–207.Google Scholar
Gersh, S. 1986. Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism, the Latin Tradition. 2 vols. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Gersh, S. 2010. “Ancient philosophy becomes medieval philosophy,” in Gerson, L. P. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 894–914.Google Scholar
Goulet, R. 1977. “Porphyre, Ammonius, les deux Origène et les autres,” Revue d’histoire et de philosophie religieuse 57: 471–496.Google Scholar
Graver, M. 2012. “Cicero and the perverse: The origins of error in De Legibus 1 and Tusculan Disputations 3,” in Nicgorski, W. (ed.), Cicero’s Practical Philosophy (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press), pp. 113–132.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. J. 2015. Aristotle’s Categories in the Early Roman Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Groisard, J. 2016. Mixis: le problème du mélange dans la philosophie grecque d’Aristote à Simplicius. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Grube, G. M. A. 1932. “The composition of the World-Soul in Timaeus 35 A–B,” Classical Philology 27: 80–82.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. 1991. “The role of the commentaries on Aristotle in the teaching of philosophy according to the Prefaces of the Neoplatonic commentaries on the Categories,” in Blumenthal, H. J. and Robinson, H. (eds.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy (Suppl.), (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 175–189.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. 1996. Simplicius, Commentaire sur le Manuel d’Épictète: Introduction et édition critique du texte grec. Philosophia Antiqua 66. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. 2005. Arts libéraux et philosophie dans la pensée antique: contribution à l’histoire de l’éducation et de la culture dans l’antiquité. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Hadot, I., Hoffmann, Ph., and Hadot, P. 1990. Simplicius: Commentaire sur les Catégories 1. Philosophia Antiqua 50. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. 1979. “Les divisions des parties de la philosophie dans l’Antiquité,” Museum Helveticum 36: 201–223.Google Scholar
Heine, R. E. 2005. “The testimonia and fragments related to Origen’s Commentary on Genesis,” Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum 9: 122–142.Google Scholar
Hoenig, C. 2013. “Εἰκὼς λόγος. Plato in Translation(s),” Methodos. Savoirs et Textes 13. http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/2994.Google Scholar
Hoenig, C. 2014. “Timaeus Latinus: Calcidius and the creation of the universe,” Rhizomata 2: 80–110.Google Scholar
Hoenig, C. 2018a. “Calcidius,” in Tarrant, H., Baltzly, D., et al. (eds.), A Companion to the Reception of Plato in Antiquity (Leiden: Brill), pp. 433–447.Google Scholar
Hoenig, C. 2018b. Plato’s Timaeus and the Latin Tradition. Cambridge Classical Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoenig, C.. Forthcoming a. “Calcidius on cosmic harmony,” in Petrucci, F. and Pelosi, F. (eds.), Music and Philosophy in the Roman Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Hoenig, C.. Forthcoming b. “Philosophical methods in Calcidius: notes on Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus 302–304,”Google Scholar
Jeauneau, É. 1975. “L’héritage de la philosophie antique durant le haut Moyen Âge,” in La cultura antica nell’ Occidente latino dal VII all’ XI secolo (Spoleto: Presso la sede del Centro), pp. 19–54.Google Scholar
Ju, A. E. 2007. “Chrysippus on nature and souls in animals,” Classical Quarterly 57: 97–108.Google Scholar
Kahlos, M. 2007. Debate and Dialogue, Christian and Pagan Cultures c. 360–430. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Karamanolis, G. 2006. Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Karamanolis, G. Forthcoming. “Calcidius on Aristotle,” [Delivered at a seminar on Calcidius organized by the Notre Dame Workshop on Ancient Philosophy in March of 2015.]Google Scholar
Kobusch, T. 2005. “Der Timaios in Chartres,” in Leinkauf, T. and Steel, C. (eds.), Plato’s Timaeus and the Foundations of Cosmology in Late Antiquity, the Middle Ages, and Renaissance (Leuven: Leuven University Press), pp. 235–251.Google Scholar
Köckert, C. 2009. Christliche Kosmologie und kaiserzeitliche Philosophie: Die Auslegung des Schöpfungsberichtes bei Origenes, Basilius und Gregor von Nyssa vor dem Hintergrund kaiserzeitlicher Timaeus-Interpretationen. Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum/Studies and Texts in Antiquity and Christianity 56. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Köckert, C. 2010. “Mose oder Platon: Grundzüge christlicher und platonischer Kosmologie in der Kaiserzeit und der Spätantike,” Jahrbuch der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen: 315–323.Google Scholar
Kritikos, A. 2007. “Platonism and principles in Origen,” in Sharples, R. W. and Sorabji, R. (eds.), Greek and Roman Philosophy 100 BC–200 AD, vol. 2. (London: Institute of Classical Studies), pp. 403–417.Google Scholar
Kurdzialek, M. 1971. “Der Mensch als Abbild des Kosmos,” in Zimmerman, A. (ed.), Der Begriff der Repraesentatio im Mittelalter (Berlin: de Gruyter), pp. 35–75.Google Scholar
Lemoine, M. 1997. “Le Timée latin en dehors de Calcidius,” in de Libera, A., Elamrani-Jamal, A., and Galonnier, A. (eds.), Langages et philosophie: hommage à Jean Jolivet (Paris: Vrin), pp. 63–78.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. 2003. “Cicero and the Timaeus,” in Reydams-Schils, G. (ed.), Plato’s Timaeus as Cultural Icon (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press), pp. 95–110.Google Scholar
Lilla, S. R. C. 1971. Clement of Alexandria: A Study in Christian Platonism and Gnosticism. Oxford Theological Monographs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. (eds.). 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Macías Villalobos, C. 2015. “Calcidio, traductor y comentarista del Timeo platónico,” Ágora. Estudos Clássicos em Debate 17: 11–57.Google Scholar
Magee, J. (ed. and trans.) 2016. Calcidius, On Plato’s Timaeus. Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library 41. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Männlein-Robert, I. (ed.) 2017. Die Christen als Bedrohung? Text, Kontext und Wirkung von Porphyrios’ Contra Christianos. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1979. “Providence and the destruction of the universe in Early Stoic thought,” in Vermaseren, M. (ed.), Studies in Hellenistic Religions (Leiden: Brill), pp. 129–188.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1988. “Compatible alternatives: Middle Platonist theology and the Xenophanes reception,” in van den Broek, R., Baarda, T., and Mansfeld, J. (eds.), Knowledge of God in the Graeco-Roman World (Leiden: Brill), pp. 92–117.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1990. “Doxography and dialectic: The Sitz im Leben of the ‘Placita,’” in Haase, W. and Temporini, H. (eds.), ANRW II.36.4 (Berlin: de Gruyter), pp. 3056–3229.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1992. Heresiography in Context: Hippolytus’ Elenchos as a Source for Greek Philosophy. Philosophia Antiqua 56. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1994. Prolegomena: Questions to Be Settled before the Study of an Author, or a Text. Philosophia Antiqua 61. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1999. “Alcinous on fate and Providence,” in Cleary, J. J. (ed.), Traditions of Platonism: Essays in Honour of John Dillon (Aldershot: Ashgate), pp. 139–149.Google Scholar
May, G. 1994. Creatio ex nihilo: The Doctrine of “Creation out of Nothing” in Early Christian Thought. Translated by A. S. Worrall. London: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Metzler, K. 2005. “Weitere Testimonien und Fragmente zum Genesis-Kommentar des Origenes,” Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum 9: 143–148.Google Scholar
Metzler, K. (ed. and trans.) 2010. Origenes: Werke mit deutscher Übersetzung, Band 1/1. Die Kommentierung des Buches Genesis. Berlin: de Gruyter/Herder.Google Scholar
Michalewski, A. 2014. La puissance de l’intelligible: la théorie plotinienne des Formes au miroir de l’héritage médioplatonicien. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Michalewski, A. 2016. “The reception of Aristotle in Middle Platonism: From Eudorus of Alexandria to Ammonius Saccas,” in Falcon, A. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity (Leiden: Brill), pp. 218–237.Google Scholar
Michalewski, A. 2017. “Faut-il préférer Épicure à Aristote? Quelques réflexions sur la providence,” in Baghdassarian, F. and Guyomarc’h, G. (eds.), Réceptions de la théologie aristotélicienne: d’Aristote à Michel d’Ephèse (Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters), pp. 123–142.Google Scholar
Militello, C. 2008. “Il divino nella traduzione Calcidiana del Timeo,” in Martello, C., Militello, C., and Vella, A. (eds.), Cosmogonie e cosmologie nel medievo (Louvain-la-Neuve: FIDEM), pp. 253–268.Google Scholar
Moraux, P. 1971–2001. Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen. 3 vols. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Moreschini, C. 2002. “Il Commento al Timeo di Calcidio tra platonismo e cristianesimo,” in Barbanti, M., Giardina, G. R., and Manganaro, P. (eds.), Henôsis kai philia, unione e amicizia. Omaggio a Francesco Romano (Catania: CUECM), pp. 433–440.Google Scholar
Moreschini, C. (trans.) 2003. Calcidio, Commentario al Timeo di Platone: testo latino a fronte. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Moreschini, C. 2017. “Calcidius between creatio ex nihilo and Platonism,” in Roskam, G. and Verheyden, J. (eds.), Light on Creation: Ancient Commentators in Dialogue and Debate on the Origin of the World (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), pp. 259–276.Google Scholar
O’Brien, C. S. 2015. The Demiurge in Ancient Thought: Secondary Gods and Divine Mediators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. J. 2003. Platonopolis: Platonic Political Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. 2001. “Neoplatonist criticisms of Plutarch,” in Pérez Jiménez, A. and Casadesús, F. (eds.), Estudios sobre Plutarco: misticismo y religiones mistéricas en la obra de Plutarco (Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas), pp. 187–200.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. 2005. “Demiurges in Early Imperial Platonism,” in Hirsch-Luipold, R. (ed.), Gott und die Götter bei Plutarch: Götterbilder – Gottesbilder – Weltbilder (Berlin: de Gruyter), pp. 51–99.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. 2012. “In defence of geometric atomism: Explaining elemental properties,” in Wilberding, J. and Horn, C. (eds.), Neoplatonism and the Philosophy of Nature (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 147–173.Google Scholar
Pépin, J. 1964. Théologie cosmique et théologie chrétienne (Ambroise, Exam. I 1, 1–4). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Petrucci, F. 2012a. “Il Commento al Timeo di Adrasto di Afrodisia,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 23: 1–33.Google Scholar
Petrucci, F. (ed. and trans.) 2012b. Teone di Smirne: Expositio rerum mathematicarum ad legendum Platonem utilium. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
Petrucci, F. 2018. Taurus of Beirut and the Other Side of Middle Platonism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Powers, N. 2012. “The Stoic argument for the rationality of the cosmos,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43: 245–269.Google Scholar
Praechter, K. 1990. “Review of the Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca,” in Sorabji, R. (ed.), Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence (Ithaca: Cornell University Press), pp. 31–54.Google Scholar
Ratkowitsch, C. 1996. “Die Timaios-Übersetzung des Chalcidius, Ein Plato Christianus,” Philologus 140: 139–162.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. 1997. “Plato’s World Soul: Grasping sensibles without sense-perception,” in Brisson, L. and Calvo, T. (eds.), Interpreting the Timaeus-Critias: Proceedings of the IV Symposium Platonicum; Selected Papers (Sankt Augustin: Academia), pp. 261–265.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. 1999. Demiurge and Providence: Stoic and Platonist Readings of Plato’s Timaeus. Monothéismes et Philosophie. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. 2002a. “Calcidius Christianus? God, body, and matter,” in Kobusch, T., Erler, M., and Männlein-Robert, I. (eds.), Metaphysik und Religion: Zur Signatur des spätantiken Denkens (München and Leipzig: Saur), pp. 193–211.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. 2002b. “Philo of Alexandria on Stoic and Platonist psycho-physiology: The Socratic higher ground,” Ancient Philosophy 22: 125–147.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. 2004. “Review of T. Tieleman, Galen and Chrysippus on the Soul: Argument and Refutation in the De Placitis, Books II–III (Leiden: Brill, 1996),” Ancient Philosophy 24: 510–519.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. 2006. “Calcidius on the human and the World-Soul, and Middle-Platonist Psychology,” Apeiron 39: 197–220.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. 2007a. “Calcidius on God,” in Bonazzi, M. and Helmig, C. (eds.), Platonic Stoicism – Stoic Platonism: The Dialogue between Platonism and Stoicism in Antiquity (Leuven: Leuven University Press), pp. 243–258.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. 2007b. “Meta-discourse: Plato’s Timaeus according to Calcidius,” Phronesis 52: 301–327.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. 2009. “Review of David Sedley, Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007),” Philosophie Antique 9: 211–215.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. 2010. “Calcidius,” in Gerson, L. P. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, vol. 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 498–508.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. 2012. “Review of C. Köckert, Christliche Kosmologie und kaiserzeitliche Philosophie (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2009),” Gnomon 84: 163–164.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. 2013. “The Academy, the Stoics and Cicero on Plato’s Timaeus,” in Long, A. G. (ed.), Plato and the Stoics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 29–58.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. 2015. “Calcidius on matter: A minimalist dualism (summary of presentation),” Chôra: Revue d’études anciennes et médiévales 13: 241–245.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. 2017a. “‘Becoming like God’ in Platonism and Stoicism,” in Engberg-Pedersen, T. (ed.), From Stoicism to Platonism: The Development of Philosophy, 100 BCE–100 CE (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 142–158.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. 2017b. “Maximus of Tyre on God and Providence,” in Seaford, R., Wilkins, J., and Wright, M. (eds.), Selfhood and the Soul: Essays on Ancient Thought and Literature in Honour of Christopher Gill (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 125–138.Google Scholar
Rudolph, E. 2000. “Der neue Timaios ‘nach’ Calcidius,” in Neschke-Hentschke, A. (ed.), Le Timée de Platon: Contributions à l’histoire de sa réception (Leuven: Peeters), pp. 97–108.Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. 1986. Philo of Alexandria and the Timaeus of Plato. Philosophia Antiqua 44. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. 1993. Philo in Early Christian Literature: A Survey. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2007. Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. 1983. “Nemesius of Emesa and some theories of divine Providence,” Vigiliae Christianae 37: 141–156.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. 2002. “Aristotelian theology after Aristotle,” in Frede, M. and Laks, A. (eds.), Traditions of Theology: Studies in Hellenistic Theology, Its Background and Aftermath (Leiden: Brill), pp. 1–40.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. 2003. “Threefold Providence: The history and background of a doctrine,” in Sharples, R. W. and Sheppard, A. (eds.), Ancient Approaches to Plato’s Timaeus (London: Institute of Classical Studies), pp. 107–127.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. 2007. “The Stoic background to the Middle Platonist discussion of fate,” in Bonazzi, M. and Helmig, C. (eds.), Platonic Stoicism – Stoic Platonism: The Dialogue between Platonism and Stoicism in Antiquity (Leuven: Leuven University Press), pp. 169–188.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. and van der Eijk, P. J. (ed., trans., and notes) 2008. Nemesius, On the Nature of Man. Translated with an Introduction and Notes. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1984. “Did Porphyry reject the transmigration of human souls into animals?” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 127: 276–284.Google Scholar
Sodano, A. R. (ed.) 1964. Porphyrii In Platonis Timaeum commentariorum fragmenta. Naples: s.n.Google Scholar
Somfai, A. 2002. “The eleventh-century shift in the reception of Plato’s Timaeus and Calcidius’ Commentary,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 65: 1–21.Google Scholar
Somfai, A. 2003. “The nature of daemons: A theological application of the concept of geometrical proportion in Calcidius’ Commentary to Plato’s Timaeus (40d–41a),” in Sharples, R. W. and Sheppard, A. (eds.), Ancient Approaches to Plato’s Timaeus (London: Institute of Classical Studies), pp. 129–142.Google Scholar
Somfai, A. 2004. “Calcidius’ Commentary to Plato’s Timaeus and its place in the commentary tradition: The concept of analogia in text and diagrams,” in Adamson, P., Baltussen, H., and Stone, M. W. F. (eds.), Philosophy, Science and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentaries (London: Institute of Classical Studies), pp. 203–330.Google Scholar
Somfai, A. 2005. “The Brussels Gloss: A tenth-century reading of the geometrical and arithmetical passages of Calcidius’s Commentary (ca. 400 AD) to Plato’s Timaeus,” in Jacquart, D. and Burnett, C. (eds.), Scientia in margine. Études sur les marginalia dans les manuscrits scientifiques du Moyen Âge à la Renaissance (Geneva: Droz), pp. 139–169.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 2006. Time, Creation, and the Continuum: Theories in Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Speer, A. 2005. “Lectio physica: Anmerkungen zur Timaios-Rezeption im Mittelalter,” in Leinkauf, T. and Steel, C. (eds.), Plato’s Timaeus and the Foundations of Cosmology in Late Antiquity, the Middle Ages, and Renaissance (Leuven: Leuven University Press), pp. 213–234.Google Scholar
Steinheimer, E. 1912. Untersuchungen über die Quellen des Chalcidius. Aschaffenburg: Werbrun.Google Scholar
Stover, J. A. (ed. and trans.) 2016. A New Work by Apuleius: The Lost Third Book of the De Platone. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Switalski, B. W. 1902. Des Chalcidius Kommentar zu Plato’s Timaeus: eine historisch-kritische Untersuchung. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters 3.6. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Tanaseanu-Döbler, I. 2008. Konversion zur Philosophie in der Spätantike: Kaiser Julian und Senesios von Kyrene. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Tanaseanu-Döbler, I. 2017. “Porphyrios und die Christen in De philosophia ex oraculis haurienda,” in Männlein-Robert, I. (ed.), Die Christen als Bedrohung? Text, Kontext und Wirkung von Porphyrios’ Contra Christianos (Stuttgart: Steiner), pp. 137–175.Google Scholar
Theiler, W. 1973. “Vitalis vigor bei Calcidius,” in van der Nat, P. G., Sicking, C. M. J., den Boer, W., and van Winden, J. C. M. (eds.), Romanitas et Christianitas: Studia I. H. Waszink … oblata (Amsterdam: North-Holland), pp. 311–316.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. 1996. Galen and Chrysippus on the Soul: Argument and Refutation in the De Placitis, Books II–III. Philosophia Antiqua 68. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Trabattoni, F. 1993. “Il problema dell’anima individuale in Calcidio,” in Conca, F., Gualandri, I., and Lozza, G. (eds.), Politica, cultura e religione nell’impero romano (secoli IV–VI) tra Oriente e Occidente (Naples: D’Auria), pp. 289–304.Google Scholar
Ulacco, A. and Opsomer, J.. 2014. “Elements and elemental properties in Timaeus Locrus,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 157: 154–206.Google Scholar
van der Tak, J. G. 1972. “Calcidius’ illustration of the astronomy of Heracleides of Pontos,” Mnemosyne 25: 148–156.Google Scholar
van Hoof, L. 2010. Plutarch’s Practical Ethics: The Social Dynamics of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van Hoof, L. and van Nuffelen, P.. 2014. Literature and Society in the Fourth Century AD: Performing Paideia, Constructing the Present, Presenting the Self. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
van Nuffelen, P. 2011. Rethinking the Gods: Philosophical Readings of Religion in the Post-Hellenistic Period. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Winden, J. C. M. 1959. Calcidius on Matter: His Doctrine and Sources. A Chapter in the History of Platonism. Philosophia Antiqua 9. Leiden: Brill. [reprinted in 1965 with additions]Google Scholar
van Winden, J. C. M. 1981. “‘Terra autem stupida quadam erat admiratione.’ Reflections on a remarkable translation of Genesis 1:2a,” in van den Broek, R. and Vermaseren, M. J. (eds.), Studies in Gnosticism and Hellenistic Religions (Leiden: Brill), pp. 458–466.Google Scholar
Vimercati, E. 2020. “Middle Platonists on Fate and Providence. God, creation, and the governance of the world,” in R. Brouwer and E. Vimercati (eds.), Fate, Providence and Free Will. Philosophy and Religion in Dialogue in the Early Imperial Age (Leiden: Brill), pp. 116–136.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1965. “Creation in the Timaeus: Is it a fiction?” in Allen, R. E. (ed.), Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul), pp. 401–419.Google Scholar
Waszink, J. H. 1962. Timaeus a Calcidio translatus commentarioque instructus, Corpus Platonicum Medii Aevi, Plato Latinus 4. London and Leiden: Brill. [reprinted in 1975 with additions]Google Scholar
Waszink, J. H. 1964. Studien zum Timaioskommentar des Calcidius: I. Die erste Hälfte des Kommentars (mit Ausnahme der Kapitel über die Weltseele). Philosophia Antiqua 12. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Waszink, J. H. 1966. “Porphyrios und Numenios,” in Porphyre (Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique 12) (Geneva: Fondation Hardt), pp. 35–78.Google Scholar
Waszink, J. H. 1969. “Calcidius’ Erklärug von Tim. 41e2–42a4,” Museum Helveticum 26: 271–280.Google Scholar
Waszink, J. H. 1972. “Nachträge zum Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum,” Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum 15: 236–244.Google Scholar
Waszink, J. H. 1984. “La conception du temps dans le Commentaire sur le Timée de Calcidius,” in Le temps chrétien de la fin de l’antiquité au moyen age, IIIe–XIIIe siècles (Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), pp. 363–368.Google Scholar
Westerink, L. G. 1990. “The Alexandrian commentators and the introductions to their commentaries,” in Sorabji, R. (ed.), Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), pp. 325–349.Google Scholar
Winston, D. 1985. Logos and Mystical Theology in Philo of Alexandria. Cincinnati, OH: Hebrew Union College Press.Google Scholar
Zambon, M. 2002. Porphyre et le moyen-platonisme. Histoire des doctrines de l’Antiquité classique 27. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Zeyl, D. J. 2000. Plato, Timaeus. Translated with Introduction. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Ziebritzki, H. 1994. Heiliger Geist und Weltseele: Das Problem der dritten Hypostase bei Origenes, Plotin und ihren Vorläufern. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar