Adams, J. F., Haeberly, J.-P., Jackowski, S., May, J. P., A generalization of the Atiyah–Segal completion theorem. Topology 27 (1988), no. 1, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, J. C., The bordism ring of manifolds with involution. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 31 (1972), 536–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atiyah, M. F., Bott periodicity and the index of elliptic operators. Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 19 (1968), 113–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atiyah, M. F., Bott, R., Shapiro, A., Clifford modules. Topology 3 (1964) suppl. 1, 3–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atiyah, M. F., Segal, G. B., Equivariant K-theory and completion. J. Differential Geom. 3 (1969), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, J. C., Gottlieb, D. H., The transfer map and fiber bundles. Topology 14 (1975), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beem, R. P., Generators for G bordism. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 67 (1977), no. 2, 335–343.Google Scholar

Beem, R. P., The structure of Z/4 bordism. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 27 (1978), no. 6, 1039–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beem, R. B., Rowlett, R. J., The fixed point homomorphism for maps of period 2^k . Indiana Univ. Math. J. 30 (1981), no. 4, 489–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beilinson, A. A., Bernstein, J., Deligne, P., Faisceaux pervers. Analysis and topology on singular spaces, I (Luminy, 1981), 5–171, Astérisque, 100, Soc. Math. France, Paris, 1982.Google Scholar

Beligiannis, A., Reiten, I., Homological and homotopical aspects of torsion theories. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 188 (2007), no. 883, viii+207 pp.Google Scholar

Berger, C., Moerdijk, I., On an extension of the notion of Reedy category. Math. Z. 269 (2011), no. 3–4, 977–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Besse, A. L., Einstein manifolds. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3) 10. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987. xii+510 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blumberg, A. J., Continuous functors as a model for the equivariant stable homotopy category. Algebr. Geom. Topol. 6 (2006), 2257–2295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boardman, J. M., On stable homotopy theory and some applications. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge (1964).Google Scholar

Boardman, J. M., Vogt, R. M., Homotopy-everything H-spaces. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 74 (1968), 1117–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

J. Boardman, M., Vogt, R. M., Homotopy invariant algebraic structures on topological spaces. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 347. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1973. x+257 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohmann, A. M., Topics in equivariant stable homotopy theory. PhD thesis, University of Chicago, 2011.Google Scholar

Bohmann, A. M., Global orthogonal spectra. Homology Homotopy Appl. 16 (2014), no. 1, 313–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boltje, R., A canonical Brauer induction formula. Astérisque No. 181–182 (1990) 5, 31–59.Google Scholar

Boltje, R., Snaith, V., Symonds, P., Algebraicisation of explicit Brauer induction. J. Algebra 148 (1992), no. 2, 504–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bousfield, A. K., Friedlander, E. M., Homotopy theory of Γ-spaces, spectra, and bisimplicial sets. Geometric applications of homotopy theory (Proc. Conf., Evanston, Ill., 1977), II, pp. 80–130, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 658, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bott, R., The stable homotopy of the classical groups. Ann. of Math. (2) 70 (1959), 313–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brauer, R., On Artin’s L-series with general group characters. Ann. of Math. (2) 48 (1947), 502–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bredon, G. E., Equivariant cohomology theories. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 34, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1967. vi+64 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bredon, G. E., Introduction to compact transformation groups. Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 46. Academic Press, New York-London, 1972. xiii+459 pp.Google Scholar

Bröcker, T., Hook, E. C., Stable equivariant bordism. Math. Z. 129 (1972), 269–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bröcker, T., tom Dieck, T., Representations of compact Lie groups. Graduate Texts in Math., Vol. 98, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985. x+313 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, K. S., Abstract homotopy theory and generalized sheaf cohomology. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 186 (1974), 419–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, R., Function spaces and product topologies. Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 15 (1964), 238–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brun, M., Witt vectors and equivariant ring spectra applied to cobordism. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 94 (2007), 351–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brun, M., Dundas, B. I., Stolz, M., Equivariant structure on smash powers. arXiv:1604.05939Google Scholar

Bruner, R., Greenlees, J., The connective K-theory of finite groups. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 165 (2003), no. 785, viii+127 pp.Google Scholar

Bruner, R., May, J. P., McClure, J., Steinberger, M., H_∞ ring spectra and their applications. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1176. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986. viii+388 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlsson, G., Equivariant stable homotopy and Segal’s Burnside ring conjecture. Ann. of Math. (2) 120 (1984), no. 2, 189–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christensen, J. D., Hovey, M., Quillen model structures for relative homological algebra. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 133 (2002), no. 2, 261–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, D. E., Spaces with weak topology. Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 5, (1954), 77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, M., Mixing model structures. Topology Appl. 153 (2006), no. 7, 1016– 1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conner, P. E., Floyd, E. E., Differentiable periodic maps. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, N. F., Band 33, Academic Press Inc., Publishers, New York; Springer-Verlag, 1964. vii+148 pp.Google Scholar

Costenoble, S. R., Equivariant cobordism and K-theory. PhD thesis, University of Chicago, 1985.Google Scholar

Curtis, E. B., Simplicial homotopy theory. Advances in Math. 6 (1971), 107–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Day, B., On closed categories of functors. Reports of the Midwest Category Seminar, IV pp. 1–38. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 137. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dowker, C. H., Topology of metric complexes. Amer. J. Math. 74 (1952), 555–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dress, A., Notes on the theory of representations of finite groups. Duplicated notes, Bielefeld, 1971.Google Scholar

Dugger, D., An Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence for KR-theory. K-theory 35 (2005), 213–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dugger, D., Isaksen, D. C., Topological hypercovers and A¹ -realizations. Math. Z. 246 (2004), no. 4, 667–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dundas, B., Goodwillie, T. G., McCarthy, R., The local structure of algebraic K-theory. Algebra and Applications, 18. Springer-Verlag London, Ltd., London, 2013. xvi+435 pp.Google Scholar

Dwyer, W. G., Spalinski, J., Homotopy theories and model categories. In: Handbook of algebraic topology, ed. I. M. James, Elsevier (1995), 73–126.Google Scholar

Eilenberg, S., Zilber, J. A., Semi-simplicial complexes and singular homology. Ann. of Math. (2) 51 (1950), 499–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elmendorf, A. D., Kriz, I., Mandell, M. A., May, J. P., Rings, modules, and algebras in stable homotopy theory. With an appendix by M. Cole. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 47, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1997, xii+249 pp.Google Scholar

Elmendorf, A. D., Mandell, M. A., Rings, modules, and algebras in infinite loop space theory. Adv. Math. 205 (2006), no. 1, 163–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fausk, H., Equivariant homotopy theory for pro-spectra. Geom. Topol. 12 (2008), 103–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feshbach, M., The transfer and compact Lie groups. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 251 (1979), 139–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Firsching, M., Real equivariant bordism for elementary abelian 2-groups. Homology Homotopy Appl. 15 (2013), no. 1, 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fresse, B., Modules over operads and functors. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1967. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2009. x+308 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedlander, E. M., Mazur, B., Filtrations on the homology of algebraic varieties. With an appendix by Daniel Quillen. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 110 (1994), no. 529, x+110 pp.Google Scholar

Fritsch, R., Piccinini, R., Cellular structures in topology. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 19. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990. xii+326 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gabriel, P., Zisman, M., Calculus of fractions and homotopy theory. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, Band 35. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, 1967. x+168 pp.Google Scholar

Galatius, S., Tillmann, U., Madsen, I., Weiss, M., The homotopy type of the cobordism category. Acta Math. 202 (2009), no. 2, 195–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ganter, N., Global Mackey functors with operations and n-special lambda rings. arXiv:1301.4616Google Scholar

Gepner, D., Henriques, A., Homotopy theory of orbispaces. arXiv:math.AT/0701916Google Scholar

Goerss, P., Hopkins, M., Moduli spaces of commutative ring spectra. Structured ring spectra, 151–200, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., 315, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goerss, P. G., Jardine, J. F., Simplicial homotopy theory. Progress in Mathematics, 174. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 1999. xvi+510 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gorchinskiy, S., Guletskiĭ, V., Symmetric powers in abstract homotopy categories. Adv. Math. 292 (2016), 707–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, J. A., Axiomatic representation theory for finite groups. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 1 (1971), 41–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenlees, J. P. C., Equivariant connective K-theory for compact Lie groups. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 187 (2004), 129–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenlees, J. P. C., May, J. P., Generalized Tate cohomology. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 113 (1995), no. 543, viii+178 pp.Google Scholar

Greenlees, J. P. C., May, J. P., Localization and completion theorems for MU-module spectra. Ann. of Math. (2) 146 (1997), 509–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haag, U., Some algebraic features of Z₂ -graded KK-theory. K-Theory 13 (1998), no. 1, 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, B., Bott periodicity via simplicial spaces. J. Algebra 62 (1980), no. 2, 450–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hatcher, A., Algebraic topology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002. xii+544 pp.Google Scholar

Hausmann, M., Global equivariant homotopy theory of symmetric spectra. Master thesis, Universität Bonn, 2013.Google Scholar

Hausmann, M., Symmetric spectra model global homotopy theory of finite groups. arXiv:1509.09270Google Scholar

Hausmann, M., Ostermayr, D., Filtrations of global equivariant K-theory. arXiv:1510.04011Google Scholar

Higson, N., Kasparov, G., Trout, J., A Bott periodicity theorem for infinite-dimensional Euclidean space. Adv. Math. 135 (1998), no. 1, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Higson, N., Guentner, E., Group C ^∗ -algebras and K-theory. Noncommutative geometry, 137–251, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1831, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, M., Hopkins, M., Ravenel, D., On the nonexistence of elements of Kervaire invariant one. Ann. of Math. (2) 184 (2016), 1–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirschhorn, P. S., Model categories and their localizations. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 99. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2003. xvi+457 pp.Google Scholar

Hohnhold, H., Stolz, S., Teichner, P., From minimal geodesics to supersymmetric field theories. A celebration of the mathematical legacy of Raoul Bott, 207–274, CRM Proc. Lecture Notes 50, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hovey, M., Model categories. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 63. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1999, xii+209 pp.Google Scholar

Hovey, M., Shipley, B., Smith, J., Symmetric spectra. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 13 (2000), 149–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurewicz, W., Beiträge zur Topologie der Deformationen. IV. Asphärische Räume. Proc. Kon. Akad. Wet. Amsterdam 39 (1936), 215–224.Google Scholar

Illman, S., Smooth equivariant triangulations of G-manifolds for G a finite group. Math. Ann. 233 (1978), no. 3, 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Illman, S., The equivariant triangulation theorem for actions of compact Lie groups. Math. Ann. 262 (1983), 487–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Illman, S., Restricting the transformation group in equivariant CW complexes. Osaka J. Math. 27 (1990), no. 1, 191–206.Google Scholar

Joachim, M., Higher coherences for equivariant K-theory. Structured ring spectra, 87–114, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., 315, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kan, D. M., On c. s. s. complexes. Amer. J. Math. 79 (1957), 449–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karoubi, M., Sur la K-théorie équivariante. Séminaire Heidelberg-Saarbrücken-Strasbourg sur la K-théorie (1967/68), 187–253. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 136. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1970.Google Scholar

Kelley, J. L., General topology. D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., Toronto-New York-London, 1955. xiv+298 pp.Google Scholar

Kelly, G. M., Basic concepts of enriched category theory. Reprint of the 1982 original. Repr. Theory Appl. Categ. No. 10 (2005), vi+137 pp.Google Scholar

Kirillov, A. A., Elements of the theory of representations. Translated from the Russian by E. Hewitt. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 220. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1976. xi+315 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krause, H., A Brown representability theorem via coherent functors. Topology 41 (2002), no. 4, 853–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kriz, I., The Z/p-equivariant complex cobordism ring. Homotopy invariant algebraic structures (Baltimore, MD, 1998), 217–223, Contemp. Math., 239, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lashof, R. K., Equivariant bundles. Illinois J. Math. 26 (1982), no. 2, 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lashof, R. K., May, J. P., Segal, G. B., Equivariant bundles with abelian structural group. Proceedings of the Northwestern Homotopy Theory Conference (Evanston, Ill., 1982), 167–176, Contemp. Math., 19, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, L. G., Jr., The stable category and generalized Thom spectra. Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago, 1978.Google Scholar

Lewis, L. G., Jr., When is the natural map X −→ ΩΣX a cofibration? Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 273 (1982), no. 1, 147–155.Google Scholar

Lewis, L. G., Jr., When projective does not imply flat, and other homological anomalies. Theory Appl. Categ. 5 (1999), no. 9, 202–250.Google Scholar

Lewis, L. G., Jr., May, J. P., McClure, J. E., Classifying G-spaces and the Segal conjecture. Current trends in algebraic topology, Part 2 (London, Ont., 1981), pp. 165–179, CMS Conf. Proc., 2, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1982.Google Scholar

Lewis, L. G., Jr., May, J. P., Steinberger, M., Equivariant stable homotopy theory. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1213, Springer-Verlag, 1986. x+538 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lillig, J., A union theorem for cofibrations. Arch. Math. (Basel) 24 (1973), 410–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lind, J. A., Diagram spaces, diagram spectra and spectra of units. Algeb. Geom. Topol. 13 (2013), 1857–1935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindner, H., A remark on Mackey-functors. Manuscripta Math. 18 (1976), no. 3, 273–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Löffler, P., Equivariant unitary cobordism and classifying spaces. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Topology and its Applications (Budva, 1972), pp. 158–160. Savez Društava Mat. Fiz. i Astronom., Belgrade, 1973.Google Scholar

Mac Lane, S., Categories for the working mathematician. Second edition. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 5. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998. xii+314 pp.Google Scholar

Mandell, M. A., Algebraization of E_∞ ring spectra. Preprint, 1998.Google Scholar

Mandell, M. A., May, J. P., Schwede, S., Shipley, B., Model categories of diagram spectra. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 82 (2001), no. 2, 441–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mandell, M. A., May, J. P., Equivariant orthogonal spectra and S -modules. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 159 (2002), no. 755, x+108 pp.Google Scholar

Matumoto, T., On G-CW complexes and a theorem of J. H. C. Whitehead. J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. IA Math. 18 (1971), 363–374.Google Scholar

May, J. P., The geometry of iterated loop spaces. Lectures Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 271. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1972. viii+175 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

May, J. P., E _∞ spaces, group completions, and permutative categories. New developments in topology (Proc. Sympos. Algebraic Topology, Oxford, 1972), pp. 61–93. London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., No. 11, Cambridge University Press, London, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

May, J. P., E _∞ ring spaces and E _∞ ring spectra. With contributions by F. Quinn, N. Ray, and J. Tornehave. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 77. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1977. 268 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

May, J. P., Equivariant homotopy and cohomology theory. With contributions by M. Cole, G. Comezaña, S. Costenoble, A. D. Elmendorf, J. P. C. Greenlees, L. G. Lewis, Jr., R. J. Piacenza, G. Triantafillou, and S. Waner. CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, 91. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1996. xiv+366 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

May, J. P., A concise course in algebraic topology. Chicago Lectures in Mathematics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1999. x+243 pp.Google Scholar

May, J. P., Merling, M., Osorno, A. M., Equivariant infinite loop space theory, I. The space level story. arXiv:1704.03413Google Scholar

May, J. P., Sigurdsson, J., Parametrized homotopy theory. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 132. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2006. x+441 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McClure, J., Schwänzl, R., Vogt, R., THH(R) ≅ R⊗S ¹ for E _∞ ring spectra. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 121 (1997), no. 2, 137–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCord, M. C., Classifying spaces and infinite symmetric products. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 146 (1969), 273–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer, R., Equivariant Kasparov theory and generalized homomorphisms. K-Theory 21 (2000), no. 3, 201–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milnor, J., Construction of universal bundles. II. Ann. of Math. (2) 63 (1956), 430–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milnor, J., The geometric realization of a semi-simplicial complex. Ann. of Math. (2) 65 (1957), 357–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montgomery, D., Zippin, L., A theorem on Lie groups. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 48 (1942), 448–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morel, F., Voevodsky, V., A¹ -homotopy theory of schemes. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 90 (1999), 45–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mostow, G. D., Equivariant embeddings in Euclidean space. Ann. of Math. (2) 65 (1957), 432–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murayama, M., On G-ANRs and their G-homotopy types. Osaka J. Math. 20 (1983), no. 3, 479–512.Google Scholar

Murphy, G. J., C ^∗ -algebras and operator theory. Academic Press, Inc., Boston, MA, 1990. x+286 pp.Google Scholar

Neeman, A., The Grothendieck duality theorem via Bousfield’s techniques and Brown representability. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 9 (1996), 205–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neeman, A., Triangulated categories. Annals of Mathematics Studies, 148. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2001. viii+449 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ostermayr, D., Equivariant Γ-spaces. Homology Homotopy Appl. 18 (2016), no. 1, 295–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palais, R. S., Imbedding of compact, differentiable transformation groups in orthogonal representations. J. Math. Mech. 6 (1957), 673–678.Google Scholar

Palais, R. S., The classification of G-spaces. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 36 (1960), iv+72 pp.Google Scholar

Puppe, D., Homotopiemengen und ihre induzierten Abbildungen. I. Math. Z. 69 (1958), 299–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Puppe, D., Bemerkungen über die Erweiterung von Homotopien. Arch. Math. (Basel) 18 (1967), 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quillen, D., Homotopical algebra. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 43, Springer-Verlag, 1967. iv+156 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quillen, D., Higher algebraic K-theory. I. Algebraic K-theory, I: Higher K-theories (Proc. Conf., Battelle Memorial Inst., Seattle, Wash., 1972), pp. 85–147. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 341, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reedy, C. L. Homotopy theory of model categories. Unpublished manuscript, 1974.Google Scholar

Rezk, C., Spaces of algebra structures and cohomology of operads. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1996.Google Scholar

Rezk, C., Classifying spaces for 1-truncated compact Lie groups. Algebr. Geom. Topol. 18 (2018), 525–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rotman, J. J., An introduction to algebraic topology. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 119. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1988. xiv+433 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rotman, J. J., An introduction to homological algebra. Second edition. Universi-text. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2009. xiv+709 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sagave, S., Schlichtkrull, C., Diagram spaces and symmetric spectra. Adv. Math. 231 (2012), no. 3–4, 2116–2193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

dos Santos, P., A note on the equivariant Dold-Thom theorem. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 183 (2003), 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwede, S., The p-order of topological triangulated categories. J. Topol. 6 (2013), no. 4, 868–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwede, S., Equivariant properties of symmetric products. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 30 (2017), 673–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwede, S., Orbispaces, orthogonal spaces, and the universal compact Lie group. arXiv:1711.06019Google Scholar

Schwede, S., Shipley, B., Algebras and modules in monoidal model categories. Proc. London Math. Soc. 80 (2000), 491–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwede, S., Shipley, B., A uniqueness theorem for stable homotopy theory. Math. Z. 239 (2002), 803–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwede, S., Shipley, B., Stable model categories are categories of modules. Topology 42 (2003), no. 1, 103–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, G., Classifying spaces and spectral sequences. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 34 (1968), 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, G., The representation ring of a compact Lie group. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 34 (1968), 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, G., Equivariant K-theory. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 34 (1968), 129–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, G., Equivariant stable homotopy theory. Actes du Congrès International des Mathématiciens (Nice, 1970), Tome 2, pp. 59–63, 1971.Google Scholar

Segal, G., Categories and cohomology theories. Topology 13 (1974), 293– 312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, G., K-homology theory and algebraic K-theory. K-theory and operator algebras (Proc. Conf., Univ. Georgia, Athens, Ga., 1975), pp. 113–127. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 575, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, G., Some results in equivariant homotopy theory. Preprint, 1978.Google Scholar

de Seguins Pazzis, C., The geometric realization of a simplicial Hausdorff space is Hausdorff. Topology Appl. 160 (2013), no. 13, 1621–1632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shimakawa, K., Infinite loop G-spaces associated with monoidal G-graded categories. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 25 (1989), 239–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shimakawa, K., A note on Γ_G -spaces. Osaka J. Math. 28 (1991), no. 2, 223– 228.Google Scholar

Singer, J., Äquivariante λ-Ringe und kommutative Multiplikationen auf Moore-Spektren. Dissertation, Universität Bonn, 2007. http://hss.ulb.uni-bonn.de/2008/1400/1400.pdfGoogle Scholar

Snaith, V. P., Explicit Brauer induction. Invent. Math. 94 (1988), no. 3, 455– 478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steenrod, N. E., A convenient category of topological spaces. Michigan Math. J. 14 (1967), 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stenström, B., Rings of quotients. An introduction to methods of ring theory. Die Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 217. Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg, 1975. viii+309 pp.Google Scholar

Stolz, M., Equivariant structure on smash powers of commutative ring spectra. PhD thesis, University of Bergen, 2011.Google Scholar

Stong, R. E., Unoriented bordism and actions of finite groups. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 103 (1970), 80 pp.Google Scholar

Strickland, N. P., Complex cobordism of involutions. Geom. Topol. 5 (2001), 335–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strickland, N. P., Realising formal groups. Algebr. Geom. Topol. 3 (2003), 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strickland, N. P., The category of CGWH spaces. Preprint, available from the author’s homepage. http://neil-strickland.staff.shef.ac.ukGoogle Scholar

Sullivan, D. P., Geometric topology: localization, periodicity and Galois symmetry. The 1970 MIT notes. Edited and with a preface by A. Ranicki. K-Monographs in Mathematics, 8. Springer-Verlag, Dordrecht, 2005. xiv+283 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suslin, A. A., The Beilinson spectral sequence for the K-theory of the field of real numbers. Mat. Metody i Fiz.-Mekh. Polya No. 28 (1988), 51–52, 105; translation in J. Soviet Math. 63 (1993), no. 1, 57–58.Google Scholar

Symonds, P., A splitting principle for group representations. Comment. Math. Helv. 66 (1991), no. 2, 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tambara, D., On multiplicative transfer. Comm. Algebra 21 (1993), no. 4, 1393–1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thévenaz, J., Some remarks on G-functors and the Brauer morphism. J. Reine Angew. Math. 384 (1988), 24–56.Google Scholar

Thom, R., Quelques propriétés globales des variétés différentiables. Comment. Math. Helv. 28 (1954), 17–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

tom Dieck, T., Faserbündel mit Gruppenoperation. Arch. Math. (Basel) 20 (1969), 136–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

tom Dieck, T., Bordism of G-manifolds and integrality theorems. Topology 9 (1970), 345–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

tom Dieck, T., Orbittypen und äquivariante Homologie. I. Arch. Math. (Basel) 23 (1972), no. 1, 307–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

tom Dieck, T., Orbittypen und äquivariante Homologie. II. Arch. Math. (Basel) 26 (1975), no. 6, 650–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

tom Dieck, T., Transformation groups and representation theory. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 766. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1979. viii+309 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

tom Dieck, T., Transformation groups. De Gruyter Studies in Mathematics, 8. Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 1987. x+312 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

tom Dieck, T., Algebraic topology. EMS Textbooks in Mathematics. European Mathematical Society (EMS), Zürich, 2008. xii+567 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ullman, J., Tambara functors and commutative ring spectra. arXiv:1304.4912Google Scholar

Verona, A., Triangulation of stratified fibre bundles. Manuscripta Math. 30 (1979/80), no. 4, 425–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waner, S., Equivariant classifying spaces and fibrations. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 258 (1980), 385–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wasserman, A. G., Equivariant differential topology. Topology 8 (1969), 127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Webb, P., Two classifications of simple Mackey functors with applications to group cohomology and the decomposition of classifying spaces. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 88 (1993), no. 1–3, 265–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wegge-Olsen, N. E., K-theory and C^∗ -algebras. A friendly approach. Oxford Science Publications. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 1993. xii+370 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weibel, C. A., An introduction to homological algebra. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 38. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994. xiv+450 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, D., Model structures on commutative monoids in general model categories. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 221 (2017), no. 12, 3124–3168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitehead, J. H. C., Note on a theorem due to Borsuk. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 54 (1948), 1125–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitehead, J. H. C., Combinatorial homotopy. I. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 55, (1949). 213–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wirthmüller, K., Equivariant homology and duality. Manuscripta Math. 11 (1974), 373–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woolfson, R., Hyper-Γ-spaces and hyperspectra. Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 30 (1979), no. 118, 229–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yang, Ch.-T., On a problem of Montgomery. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 8 (1957), 255–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar