Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T06:49:00.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 10 - Open Strategy and Information Technology

from Part III - Technological Assemblages for Open Strategy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2019

David Seidl
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
Georg von Krogh
Affiliation:
Swiss Federal University (ETH), Zürich
Richard Whittington
Affiliation:
Saïd Business School, University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Open Strategy has drawn increasing attention in recent years. A growing number of studies have captured greater transparency and heightened inclusion in the strategic practices of contemporary organizations (e.g., Whittington et al., 2011; Hautz et al., 2017). It is often Information Technology (IT) that can facilitate involvement of a wider range of stakeholders in the generation of strategic content and knowledge (Chesbrough & Appleyard, 2007; Wulf & Butel, 2016), and in the practice of strategy (Whittington et al., 2011; Whittington, 2014). However, despite the widely recognized role of such technology as online platforms (Malhotra et al., 2017) and social media (Huang et al., 2013; Baptista et al., 2017) in enabling openness in strategy, literature with an explicit focus on IT has been surprisingly sparse to date (Tavakoli et al., 2015; 2017). Thus far, most papers have been published in Management and Strategic Management outlets (e.g., Whittington et al., 2011; Stieger et al., 2012; Seidl & Werle, 2017), including a special issue on Open Strategy in Long Range Planning (e.g., Hautz et al., 2017).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguilar, F.J. (1967). Scanning the business environment, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Amrollahi, A., & Ghapnchi, A.H. (2016). Open strategic planning in universities: A case study. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Koloa, pp. 386395.Google Scholar
Amrollahi, A., Ghapanchi, A.H., & Talaei-Khoei, A. (2014). Using crowdsourcing tools for implementing open strategy: A case study in education. In Twentieth Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS). Savannah, pp. 17.Google Scholar
Amrollahi, A., & Rowlands, B. (2017). Collaborative open strategic planning: A method and case study. Information Technology & People, 30(4), 832852.Google Scholar
Appleyard, M.M., & Chesbrough, H. (2017). The dynamics of open strategy: From adoption to reversion. Long Range Planning, 50(3), 310321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnaud, N., Mills, C.E., Legrand, C., & Maton, E. (2016). Materializing strategy in mundane tools: The key to coupling global strategy and local strategy practice? British Journal of Management, 27(1), 3857.Google Scholar
Arvidsson, V., Holmstrom, J., & Lyytinen, K. (2014). Information systems use as strategy practice: A multi-dimensional view of strategic information system implementation and use. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(1), 4561.Google Scholar
Aten, K., & Thomas, G.F. (2016). Crowdsourcing strategizing: Communication technology affordances and the communicative constitution of organizational strategy. International Journal of Business Communication, 53(2), 148180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakos, Y., & Treacy, M. (1986). Information technology and corporate strategy. MIS Quarterly, 10 (2), 107119.Google Scholar
Baptista, J., Wilson, A.D., Galliers, R.D., & Bynghall, S. (2017). Social media and the emergence of reflexiveness as a new capability for open strategy. Long Range Planning, 50(3), 322336.Google Scholar
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801831.Google Scholar
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99120.Google Scholar
Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Berman, S.J., & Hagan, J. (2006). How technology-driven business strategy can spur innovation and growth. Strategy & Leadership, 34(2), 2834.Google Scholar
Birkinshaw, J. (2017). Reflections on open strategy. Long Range Planning, 50(3), 423426.Google Scholar
Buhalis, D. (1998). Strategic use of information technologies in the tourism industry. Tourism Management, 19(5), 409421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullinger, A.C., Neyer, A.-K., Rass, M., & Moeslein, K.M. (2010). Community-based innovation contests: Where competition meets cooperation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(3), 290303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. (1988). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519531.Google Scholar
Carpenter, M.A., & Sanders, G. (2002). Top management team compensation: The missing link between CEO pay and firm performance? Strategic Management Journal, 23(4), 367375.Google Scholar
Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., Galliers, R.D., Henfridsson, O., Newell, S., & Vidgen, R. (2014). The sociomateriality of information systems: Current status, future directions. MIS Quarterly, 38(3), 809830.Google Scholar
Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Chesbrough, H., & Appleyard, M.M. (2007). Open innovation and strategy. California Management Review, 50(1), 5776.Google Scholar
Demir, R. (2015). Strategic activity as bundled affordances. British Journal of Management, 26(1), 125141.Google Scholar
Dos Santos, B.L., & Peffers, K. (1995). Rewards to investors in innovative information technology applications: First movers and early followers in ATMs. Organization Science, 6(3), 241259.Google Scholar
Dobusch, L., & Kapeller, J. (2018). Open strategy-making with crowds and communities: Comparing Wikimedia and Creative Commons. Long Range Planning, 51(4), 561579.Google Scholar
Dobusch, L., Dobusch, L., & Muller-Seitz, G. (2019). Closing for the benefit of openness? The case of Wikimedia’s open strategy process. Organization Studies, 40(3), 343370.Google Scholar
Estellés-Arolas, E., & González-Ladrón-de-Guevara, F. (2012). Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition. Journal of Information Science, 38(2), 189200.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Friis, O. (2015). Openness in strategy: Social strategy practices and practitioner interaction, an opportunity and threat in strategy making. In 31st EGOS Colloquium. Athens.Google Scholar
Galliers, R.D. (1987). Information systems planning in the United Kingdom and Australia: A comparison of current practice. In Zorkorczy, P. (Ed.), Oxford surveys in information technology, 4, 223255.Google Scholar
Galliers, R.D. (1991). Strategic information systems planning: Myths, reality and guidelines for successful implementation. European Journal of Information Systems, 1(1), 5564.Google Scholar
Galliers, R.D. (2006). On confronting some of the common myths of Information Systems strategy discourse. In Mansell, R., Avgerou, C., Quah, D., & Silverstone, R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of information and communication technologies (pp. 225243). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Galliers, R.D. (2011). Further developments in Information Systems strategising: Unpacking the concept. In Galliers, R.D. & Currie, W.L. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of management information systems: Critical perspectives and new directions (pp. 329345). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Galliers, R.D., Jackson., M.C., & Mingers, J. (1997). Organization theory and systems thinking: The benefits of partnership. Organization, 4(2), 269278.Google Scholar
Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2010). The future of open innovation. R&D Management, 40(3), 213221.Google Scholar
Gegenhuber, T., & Dobusch, L. (2017). Making an impression through openness: How open strategy-making practices change in the evolution of new ventures. Long Range Planning, 50(3), 337354.Google Scholar
Haefliger, S., Monteiro, E., Foray, D., & von Krogh, G. (2011). Social software and strategy. Long Range Planning, 44(5–6), 297316.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D.C. (1981). Strategic awareness within top management teams. Strategic Management Journal, 2(3), 263279.Google Scholar
Hardy, C., & Thomas, R. (2014). Strategy, discourse and practice: The intensification of power. Journal of Management Studies, 51(2), 320348.Google Scholar
Hardy, C., & Thomas, R. (2015). Discourse in a material world. Journal of Management Studies, 52(5), 680696.Google Scholar
Hautz, J., Seidl, D., & Whittington, R. (2017). Open strategy: Dimensions, dilemmas, dynamics. Long Range Planning, 50(3), 298309.Google Scholar
Henderson, J.C., & Venkatraman, N. (1993). Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 472484.Google Scholar
Henfridsson, O., & Lind, M. (2014). Information systems strategizing, organizational sub-communities, and the emergence of a sustainability strategy. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(1), 1128.Google Scholar
Heracleous, L., Gößwein, J., & Beaudette, P. (2018). Open strategy-making at the Wikimedia Foundation. A dialogic perspective. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 54(1), 535.Google Scholar
Hoskisson, R.E., Hitt, M.A., Wan, W.P., & Yiu, D. (1999). Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum. Journal of Management, 25(3), 417456.Google Scholar
Huang, J., Baptista, J., & Galliers, R.D. (2013). Reconceptualizing rhetorical practices in organizations: The impact of social media on internal communications. Information & Management, 50(2–3), 112124.Google Scholar
Hutter, K., Nketia, B.A., & Fuller, J. (2017). Falling short with participation – Different effects of ideation, commenting, and evaluating behavior on open strategizing. Long Range Planning, 50(3), 355370.Google Scholar
Itami, H., & Numagami, T. (1992). Dynamic interaction between strategy and technology. Strategic Management Journal, 13(2), 119135.Google Scholar
Ives, B. (1992). Editor’s comments: Transformed information systems management. MIS Quarterly, 16(4), lix-lxii.Google Scholar
Jarvenpaa, S.L., & Ives, B. (1990). Information technology and corporate strategy: A view from the top. Information Systems Research, 1(4), 351376.Google Scholar
Jarvenpaa, S.L., & Leidner, D.E. (1998). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(4), JCMC346.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2004). Strategy as practice: Recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use. Organization Studies, 25(4), 529560.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., & Kaplan, S. (2015). Strategy tools-in-use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice. Strategic Management Journal, 36(4), 537558.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., & Wolf, C. (2015). An activity-theory approach to strategy as practice. In Golsorkhi, D. et al. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice (pp. 166185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, G., Melin, L., & Whittington, R. (2003). Micro strategy and strategizing: Towards an activity‐based view. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 322.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P. (1992). The balanced scorecard – Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 7179.Google Scholar
Kaplan, S. (2011). Strategy and PowerPoint: An inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making. Organization Science, 22(2), 320346.Google Scholar
Koch, H., Leidner, D.E., & Gonzalez, E.S. (2013). Digitally enabling social networks: Resolving IT-culture conflict. Information Systems Journal, 23(6), 501523.Google Scholar
Kotabe, M., Sahay, A., & Aulakh, P.S. (1996). Emerging role of technology licensing in the development of global product strategy: Conceptual framework and research propositions. Journal of Marketing, 60(1), 7388.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1986). The Powers of Association. In Law, J. (Ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Leonard, J., & Higson, H. (2014). A strategic activity model of Enterprise System implementation and use: Scaffolding fluidity. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(1), 6286.Google Scholar
Leonardi, P.M. (2012). Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: What do these terms mean? How are they related? Do we need them? In Leonardi, P. M. & Kallinikos, J. (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 2548). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leonardi, P.M., & Barley, S.R. (2010). What’s under construction here? Social action, materiality, and power in constructivist studies of technology and organizing. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 151.Google Scholar
Leonardi, P.M., Huysman, M., & Steinfield, C. (2013). Enterprise social media: Definition, history, and prospects for the study of social technologies in organizations. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 19(1), 119.Google Scholar
Luedicke, M.K., Husemann, K.C., Furnari, S., & Ladstaetter, F. (2017). Radically open strategizing: How the Premium Cola collective takes open strategy to the extreme. Long Range Planning, 50(3), 371384.Google Scholar
Mack, D.Z., & Szulanski, G. (2017). Opening up: How centralization affects participation and inclusion in strategy making. Long Range Planning, 50(3), 385396.Google Scholar
Majchrzak, A. (2009). Where is the theory in Wikis? MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 1820.Google Scholar
Malhotra, A., Majchrzak, A., & Niemiec, R.M. (2017). Using public crowds for open strategy formulation: Mitigating the risks of knowledge gaps. Long Range Planning, 50(3), 397410.Google Scholar
Marabelli, M., & Galliers, R.D. (2017). A reflection on information systems strategizing: The role of power and everyday practices. Information Systems Journal, 27(3), 347366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marabelli, M., Newell, S., & Galliers, R.D. (2016). The materiality of impression management in social media use: A focus on time, space and algorithms. In Proceedings: Thirty-Seventh International Conference on Information Systems. Dublin, pp. 121.Google Scholar
Martinsons, M., Davidson, R., & Tsec, D. (1999). The Balanced Scorecard: A foundation for the strategic management of information systems. Decision Support Systems, 25(1), 7188.Google Scholar
Mata, F. J., Fuerst, W. L., & Barney, J. B. (1995). Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 487505.Google Scholar
Matzler, K., Fuller, J., Hutter, K., Hautz, J., & Stieger, D. (2014a). Open Strategy: Towards a Research Agenda, Available at SSRN 2416937 (2014).Google Scholar
Matzler, K., Fuller, J., Koch, B., Hautz, J., & Hutter, K. (2014b). Open strategy – A new strategy paradigm? In Strategie und Leadership (pp. 3755). Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
Morton, J., Wilson, A.D., & Cooke, L. (2016a). Open Strategy Initiatives: Open, IT-Enabled Episodes of Strategic Practice. In Twentieth Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems. Chiayi, pp. 17.Google Scholar
Morton, J., Wilson, A.D., & Cooke, L. (2016b). Exploring the roles of external facilitators in IT-driven open strategizing. In Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Open Collaboration (OpenSym). Berlin, pp. 14.Google Scholar
Morton, J., Wilson, A.D., & Cooke, L. (2015). Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing in Initiatives, Open Strategy. In iFutures 2015. Sheffield, pp. 17.Google Scholar
Mount, M., & Pandza, K. (2016). Open strategy making and interactive framing: A mechanism for strategic convergence in issue-driven fields. In 32nd EGOS Colloquium. Naples.Google Scholar
Newstead, B., & Lanzerotti, L. (2010). Can you open-source your strategy? Harvard Business Review, 88(10),16.Google Scholar
Nicolini, D. (2009). Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organization Studies, 30(12), 13911418.Google Scholar
Nunamaker, J.F., Chen, M., & Purdin, T. (1990). Systems development in information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(3), 89106.Google Scholar
Orlikowski, W.J. (2006). Material knowing: The scaffolding of human knowledgeability. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(5), 460.Google Scholar
Orlikowski, W.J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 14351448.Google Scholar
Orlikowski, W.J. (2008). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. In Ackerman, M.S., Halverson, C.A., Erickson, Th., & Kellogg, W.A. (Eds.), Resources, co-evolution and artifacts. New York: Springer, pp. 255305.Google Scholar
Orlikowski, W.J. (2010). Practice in research: Phenomenon, perspective and philosophy. In Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., & Vaara, E. (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3343.Google Scholar
Orlikowski, W.J., & Barley, S.R. (2001). Technology and institutions: What can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other? MIS Quarterly, 25(2), 145.Google Scholar
Orlikowski, W.J., & Iacono, C.S. (2001). Research commentary: Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research – A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 121134.Google Scholar
Peppard, J., Galliers, R.D., & Thorogood, A. (2014). Information systems strategy as practice: Micro strategy and strategizing for IS. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(1), 110.Google Scholar
Piller, F.T., & Walcher, D. (2006). Toolkits for idea competitions: A novel method to integrate users in new product development. R&D Management, 36(3), 307318.Google Scholar
Porter, M. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137145.Google Scholar
Porter, M.E., & Millar, V.E. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 63(4), 149160.Google Scholar
Powell, T.C., & Dent-Micallef, A. (1997). Information technology as competitive advantage: The role of human, business, and technology resources. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 375405.Google Scholar
Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 237263.Google Scholar
Santalainen, T.J., & Baliga, R.B. (2014). The Great Promise of Open Strategizing: Evidence from Expert Organizations. In Strategic Management Society Annual Conference. Madrid.Google Scholar
Santhanam, R., & Hartono, E. (2003). Issues in linking information technology capability to firm performance. MIS Quarterly, 125153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzki, T.R. (2001). The practice theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Seidl, D., & Werle, F. (2018). Inter-organizational sensemaking in the face of strategic meta-problems: Requisite variety and dynamics of participation. Strategic Management Journal, 39(3), 630858.Google Scholar
Smith, D.J. (2013). Power-by-the-hour: The role of technology in reshaping business strategy at Rolls-Royce. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 25(8), 9871007.Google Scholar
Somogyi, E. K., & Galliers, R. D. (1987). Applied information technology: From data processing to strategic information systems. Journal of Information Technology, 2(1), 3041.Google Scholar
Stieger, D., Matzler, K., Chatterjee, S., & Ladstaetter-Fussenegger, F. (2012). Democratizing strategy: How crowdsourcing can be used for strategy dialogues. California Management Review, 54(4), 4468.Google Scholar
Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few. London, New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Tavakoli, A., Schlagwein, D., & Schoder, D. (2017). Open strategy: Literature review, re-analysis of cases and conceptualisation as a practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 26(3), 163184.Google Scholar
Tavakoli, A., Schlagwein, D., & Schoder, D. (2015). Open Strategy: Consolidated Definition and Processual Conceptualization. In Thirty-Sixth International Conference on Information Systems. Fort Worth, pp. 112.Google Scholar
Tushman, M.L., & O’ReillyIII, C.A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 829.Google Scholar
Vaara, E., & Whittington, R. (2012). Strategy-as-practice: Taking social practices seriously. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 285336.Google Scholar
von Krogh, G. (2012). How does social software change knowledge management? Toward a strategic research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21(2), 154164.Google Scholar
Wade, M., & Hulland, J. (2004). The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1),107142.Google Scholar
Warner, T. N. (1987). SMR FORUM: Information technology as a competitive burden. Sloan Management Review, 29(1), 55.Google Scholar
Whittington, R. (1996). Strategy as practice. Long Range Planning, 29(5), 731735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2006). Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 27(5), 613634.Google Scholar
Whittington, R. (2014). Information systems strategy and strategy-as-practice: A joint agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(1), 8791.Google Scholar
Whittington, R., Cailluet, L., & Yakis-Douglas, B. (2011). Opening strategy: Evolution of a precarious profession. British Journal of Management, 22(3), 531544.Google Scholar
Whittington, R., Yakis-Douglas, B., & Ahn, K. (2016). Cheap talk? Strategy presentations as a form of chief executive officer impression management. Strategic Management Journal, 37(12), 24132424.Google Scholar
Wulf, A., & Butel, L. (2016). Knowledge sharing and innovative corporate strategies in collaborative relationships: The potential of open strategy in business ecosystems. In Liu, S., Delibasic, B., & Oderanti, F. (Eds.), Decision support systems VI – Addressing sustainability and societal challenges. Cham: Springer Nature, pp. 165181.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×