Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T13:48:49.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2019

Agnieszka Kubal
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Immigration and Refugee Law in Russia
Socio-Legal Perspectives
, pp. 179 - 196
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aas, K. F. (2011). ‘“Crimmigrant” bodies and bona fide travelers: Surveillance, citizenship and global governance’. Theoretical Criminology 15(3): 331346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abashin, S. (2017). ‘Migration policies in Russia: Laws and debates’. In Migrant Workers in Russia: Global Challenges of the Shadow Economy in Societal Transformation, eds Heusala, A.-L. and Aitamurto, K.. London, Routledge: 1634.Google Scholar
Abrego, L. (2008). ‘Legitimacy, social identity, and the mobilization of law: The effects of Assembly Bill 540 on undocumented students in California’. Law and Social Inquiry 33(3): 709734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afshar, A. (2005). ‘Refugees in Russia: The Law on Refugees and its implementation’. Journal of Refugee Studies 18(4): 468491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agadjanian, V., Menjívar, C. and Zotova, N. (2017). ‘Legality, racialization, and immigrants’ experience of ethnoracial harassment in Russia’. Social Problems 64(4): 558576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aitieva, M. (2015). ‘Materialities and moralities of remittances: The case of livestock and barn building’. In Russia’s Migration Regulatory Regime: Migration Policy, Laws, Enforcement and Effects. London, SOAS, University of London.Google Scholar
Alba, R. and Nee, V. (1997). ‘Rethinking assimilation theory for a new era of immigration’. International Migration Review 31(4): 826874.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aleinikoff, T. A., Martin, D. A., Motomura, H. and Fullerton, M. (2015). Immigration and Citizenship: Process and Policy. 8th edition. St. Paul, MN, West Tomson Reuters Publishers.Google Scholar
Aliverti, A. (2012). ‘Making people criminal: The role of the criminal law in immigration enforcement’. Theoretical Criminology 16(4): 417434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amnesty International (2013). Return to Torture: Extradition, Forcible Returns and Removals to Central Asia. London, Amnesty International. Accessed from: www.amnesty.org/en/documents/EUR04/001/2013/en/.Google Scholar
Amnesty International (2015). Secrets and Lies: Forced Confessions under Torture in Uzbekistan. London, Amnesty International. Accessed from www.amnestyusa.org/…/eur_62_1086_2015_uzbekistantorture_fullreport.pdf.Google Scholar
Amnesty International (2016a). Asylum-seeker returned from Russia to Uzbekistan in blatant violation of international law. AI index number: EUR 62/4488/2016.Google Scholar
Amnesty International (2016b). Fast-Track to Torture: Abductions and Forcible Returns from Russia to Uzbekistan. London, Amnesty International. Accessed from: www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/EUR6237402016ENGLISH.PDF.Google Scholar
Anderson, J., Hollaus, J., Lindsay, A. and Williamson, C. (2014). ‘The culture of disbelief: An ethnographic approach to understanding an under-theorised concept in the UK asylum system’. Refugee Studies Centre working paper 102.Google Scholar
Andrianova, V. (2018). ‘The everyday experiences of Russian citizens in justice of the peace courts’. In Sociology of Justice in Russia, eds Kurkchiyan, M. and Kubal, A.. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 6891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appelqvist, M. (2000). ‘Refugee law and cause lawyering: A Swedish study of the legal profession’. International Journal of Refugee Law 12(1): 7189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aranda, E., Menjívar, C. and Donato, K. M. (2014). ‘The spillover consequences of an enforcement-first U.S. immigration regime’. American Behavioral Scientist 58(13): 16871695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagenstos, S. R. (2009). Law and the Contradictions of the Disability Rights Movement. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahovadinova, M. (2016). ‘Tajikistan’s bureaucratic management of exclusion: Responses to the Russian reentry ban database’. Central Asian Affairs 3(3): 226248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, J. (1998). Early Novels and Stories New York: Library of America.Google Scholar
Baron, J. B. (1993). ‘Resistance to stories’. Southern California Law Review 67: 255.Google Scholar
Baxi, U. (2011). ‘Afterword: The struggle for sans-papiers human rights’. In Are Human Rights for Migrants? Critical Reflections on the Status of Irregular Migrants in Europe and the United States, eds Dembour, M.-B. and Kelly, T.. London, Routledge: 222232.Google Scholar
BBC (2012). Prisoners will not get the vote, says David Cameron. Accessed from www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-20053244, 21 April 2018.Google Scholar
Bear, L. (2007). Lines of the Nation: Indian Railway Workers, Bureaucracy, and the Intimate Historical Self. New York, Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedek, W. (2017). ‘Russia and the European Court of Human Rights: Some general conclusions’. In Russia and the European Court of Human Rights: The Strasbourg Effect, eds Mälksoo, L. and Benedek, W.. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 385399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, K. (2017). ‘What exactly is neoliberalism?’. The Conversation, 2 November.Google Scholar
Bisharat, G. (1998). ‘Attorneys for the people, attorneys for the land: The emergence of cause lawyering in the Israeli-occupied territories’. In Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities, eds Sarat, A. and Scheingold, S. A.. New York, Oxford University Press: 453486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blok, A. and Jensen, T. E. (2011). Bruno Latour: Hybrid Thoughts in a Hybrid World. London, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bocharov, T. and Titaev, K. (2018). ‘When business goes to court: Arbitrazh courts in Russia’. In Sociology of Justice in Russia, eds Kurkchiyan, M. and Kubal, A.. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 118140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boon, A. (2004). ‘Cause lawyers and the alternative ethical paradigm: Ideology and transgression’. Legal Ethics 7(2): 250268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, D. and Cammack, D. (2013). Governance for Development in Africa: Solving Collective Action Problems. London, Zed Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosworth, M. and Guild, M. (2008). ‘Governing through migration control: Security and citizenship in Britain’. British Journal of Criminology 48(6): 703719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosworth, M. and Kaufman, E. (2011). ‘Foreigners in a carceral age: Immigration and imprisonment in the United States’. Stanford Law & Policy Review 22: 429.Google Scholar
Boukalas, C. (2013). ‘Politics as legal action/lawyers as political actors’. Social & Legal Studies 22(3): 395420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyes-Watson, C. (2013). Crime and Justice: Learning Through Cases. Lanham, MD, Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Brouwer, J., van der Woude, M. and van der Leun, J. (2018). ‘(Cr)immigrant framing in border areas: Decision-making processes of Dutch border police officers’. Policing and Society 28(4): 448463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, C. and Hofmann, E. T. (2012). ‘Are remittances an effective mechanism for development? Evidence from Tajikistan, 1999–2007’. Journal of Development Studies 48(8): 11211138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, C., Ruble, B. A. and Hofmann, E. T. (2008). Migration, Homeland and Belonging in Eurasia. Washington, DC, Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
Buckley, M. (2018a). ‘Policy and legislation on labour migrants’. In The Politics of Unfree Labour in Russia: Human Trafficking and Labour Migration. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 218242.Google Scholar
Buckley, M. (2018b). The Politics of Unfree Labour in Russia: Human Trafficking and Labour Migration. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burkov, A. (2017). ‘The use of European human rights law in Russian courts’. In Russia and the European Court of Human Rights: The Strasbourg Effect, eds Mälksoo, L. and Benedek, W.. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 5992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, W., Maggs, P. R. and Danilenko, G. M. (2012). Law and Legal System of the Russian Federation. 5th edition. New York, Juris.Google Scholar
Burtina, E. (2018a). ‘Court practice regarding the release of stateless persons from detention following the decision of the Russian Constitutional Court from 23 May 2017 in Mskhiladze case’. In Stateless Persons in the Temporary detention Centers for Foreign Nationals of the Ministry of the Interior: Statistics, Legislation, Law Enforcement, eds Burtina, E. and Tseytlina, O.. Moscow, Human Rights Centre Memorial: 4356.Google Scholar
Burtina, E. (2018b). ‘Stateless persons in detention centres in Russia: Analysis of statistical data’. In Stateless Persons in the Temporary Detention Centers for Foreign Nationals of the Ministry of the Interior: Statistics, Legislation, Law Enforcement, eds Burtina, E. and Tseytlina, O.. Moscow, Human Rights Centre Memorial: 1122.Google Scholar
Burtina, E. and Tseytlina, O., eds (2018). Stateless Persons in the Temporary Detention Centres for Foreign Nationals of the Ministry of the Interior: Statistics, Legislation, Law Enforcement. Moscow, Human Rights Centre Memorial.Google Scholar
Burtina, E., Korosteleva, E. and Simonov, V. (2015). Russia as a Country of Asylum. Report on the Implementation of the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees by the Russian Federation. Moscow: Civic Assistance Committee. Accessed from: http://refugee.ru/en/news/russia-as-a-country-of-asylum, 3 June 2016 (English translation).Google Scholar
Campbell, J. R. (2017). Bureaucracy, Law and Dystopia in the United Kingdom’s Asylum System. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Caple James, E. (2004). ‘The political economy of “trauma” in Haiti in the democratic era of insecurity’. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 28(2): 127149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, S. (2010). ‘Understanding global migration: A social transformation perspective’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36(10): 15651586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, S. (2015). ‘International human mobility: Key issues and challenges to social theory’. In Social Transformation and Migration: National and Local Experiences in South Korea, Turkey, Mexico and Australia, eds Ozkul, D.. Castles, S. and Cubas, M.. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, S., De Haas, H. and Miller, M. J. (2014). The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chacón, J. M. (2009). ‘Managing migration through crime’. Columbia Law Review Sidebar 109: 135148.Google Scholar
Chacón, J. M. (2012). ‘Overcriminalizing migration’. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 102(3): 613652.Google Scholar
Chacón, J. M. (2018). ‘Narrowing asylum grounds, family separations and supreme indifference at the U.S. border’. Border Criminologies Blog. Available at: www.law.ox.ac.uk/research-subject-groups/centre-criminology/centreborder-criminologies/blog/2018/07/narrowing-asylum (accessed 9 July 2018).Google Scholar
Chon, M. (1995). ‘On the need for Asian American narratives in law: Ethnic specimens, native informants, storytelling and silences’. UCLA Asian Pacific American Law Journal 3: 432.Google Scholar
Chupik, V. (2015). ‘Laws as roots of corruption and xenophobia: Migrants’ daily encounters with law and order authorities’. In Russia’s Migration Regulatory Regime: Migration Policy, Laws, Enforcement and Effects workshop, SOAS, London, 19 June.Google Scholar
Cienski, J. (1994). ‘Chilly reception for refugees in Russia’. Refugees Magazine 98. Available at: www.unhcr.org/uk/publications/refugeemag/3b54109e4/refugees-magazine-issue-98-soviet-union-chilly-reception-refugees-russia.html (accessed 7 June 2018).Google Scholar
Cody, F. (2009). ‘Inscribing subjects to citizenship: Petitions, literacy activism, and the performativity of signature in rural Tamil India’. Cultural Anthropology 24(3): 347380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, R. (1995). The Cambridge Survey of World Migration, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comaroff, J. and Comaroff, J. (2007). ‘Law and disorder in the postcolony’. Social Anthropology 15(2): 133152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights (2014). ‘Urgent need to deal with new failures to co-operate with the European Court of Human Rights’. Strasbourg, Parliamentary Assembly Council of Europe. Available at: http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-DocDetails-EN.asp?fileid=20348 (accessed 26 May 2018).Google Scholar
Costello, C. (2016). The Human Rights of Migrants in European Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Council of Europe – Committee of Ministers. (2017). ‘H46-23 Garabayev group v. Russian Federation (Application No. 38411/02): Supervision of the execution of the European Court’s judgments’. Available at: https://search.coe.int/cm/pages/result_details.aspx?objectid=09000016806e43fb (accessed 28 May 2018).Google Scholar
Coutin, S. B. (1998). ‘From refugees to immigrants: The legalization strategies of Salvadoran immigrants and activists’. International Migration Review 32(4): 901925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coutin, S. B. (2000). Legalizing Moves: Salvadoran Immigrants’ Struggle for US Residency. Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Coutin, S. B. (2001). ‘Cause lawyering in the shadow of the state: A US immigration example’. In Cause Lawyering and the State in a Global Era, eds Sarat, A. and Scheingold, S. A.. New York, Oxford University Press: 117140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coutin, S. B. (2002). ‘Questionable transactions as grounds for legalization: Immigration, illegality, and law’. Crime Law and Social Change 37(1): 1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coutin, S. B. (2006). ‘Cause lawyering and political advocacy: Moving law on behalf of Central American refugees’. In Cause Lawyers and Social Movements., eds Sarat, A. and Scheingold, S. A.. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press: 101119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coutin, S. B., Maurer, B. and Yngvesson, B. (2002). ‘In the mirror: The legitimation work of globalization’. Law & Social Inquiry 27(4): 801843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davé, B. (2014). ‘Becoming “legal” through “illegal” procedures: The precarious status of migrant workers in Russia’. Russian Analytical Digest 159: 26.Google Scholar
Davis, M. (1993). Brutal Need. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
de Certeau, M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. London, University of California Press.Google Scholar
de Genova, N. P. (2002). ‘Migrant “illegality” and deportability in everyday life’. Annual Review of Anthropology 31: 419447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Genova, N. P. (2004). ‘The legal production of Mexican/migrant “illegality”’. Latino Studies 2(2): 160185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Genova, N. P. and Peutz, N., eds (2010). The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement. Durham, Durham University Press.Google Scholar
de Haas, H. (2010). ‘The internal dynamics of migration processes: A theoretical inquiry’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36(10): 15871617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Haas, H. (2012). ‘The migration and development pendulum: A critical view on research and policy’. International Migration 50(3): 825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dedov, D. (2017). ‘Dissenting Opinion of Judge Dedov: Z.A. and Others v Russia Judgment, Separate Opinion’. European Court of Human Rights. Judgment of 28 March 2017. Available at: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-172107 (accessed 28 May 2018): 26–28.Google Scholar
Delgado, R. (1989). ‘Storytelling for oppositionists and others: A plea for narrative’. Michigan Law Review 87(8): 24112441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delgado, R. (1993). ‘On telling stories in school: A reply to Farber and Sherry’. Vanderbilt Law Review 46: 665.Google Scholar
Delgado, R. (1996). The Rodrigo Chronicles: Conversations about America and Race. New York, New York University Press.Google Scholar
Dembour, M.-B. (2015). When Humans Become Migrants: Study of the European Court of Human Rights with an Inter-American Counterpoint. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dembour, M.-B. and Kelly, T. (2011). Are Human Rights for Migrants? Critical Reflections on the Status of Irregular Migrants in Europe and the United States. London, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denisenko, M. and Varshavskaya, Y. (2013). ‘Migrants at the Russian labour market: Characteristics, status, mobility’. WP3/21 Search Working Paper. Moscow, Higher School of Economics. Available at: www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/WP_3_21.pdf (accessed 11 June 2018): 25.Google Scholar
Di Donato, F. (2011). ‘Constructing legal narratives: Client-lawyers’ stories’. In Exploring Courtroom Discourse: The Language of Power and Control, ed. Cheng, L.. London, Routledge: 129146.Google Scholar
Doolotkeldieva, A. (2008). ‘Conducting interviews with labour migrants in Moscow’. CESR 7(2): 3134.Google Scholar
Espinoza, L. G. (1997). ‘Legal narratives, therapeutic narratives: The invisibility and omnipresence of race and gender’. Michigan Law Review 95(4): 901937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Court of Human Rights (2018). Annual Report 2017: European Court of Human Rights. Strasbourg, Council of Europe. Available at: www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Annual_report_2017_ENG.pdf (accessed 1 June 2018).Google Scholar
European Court of Human Rights Registrar (2009). The pilot-judgment procedure. Information note issued by the Registrar. Available at: www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Pilot_judgment_procedure_ENG.pdf (accessed 28 May 2018).Google Scholar
Ewick, P. and Silbey, S. (1995). ‘Subversive stories and hegemonic tales: Toward a sociology of narrative’. Law and Society Review 29(2): 197226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewick, P. and Silbey, S. (2003). ‘Narrating social structure: Stories of resistance to legal authority’. American Journal of Sociology 108(6): 13281372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farber, D. A. and Sherry, S. (1993). ‘Telling stories out of school: An essay on legal narratives’. Stanford Law Review 45(4): 807855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federal Migration Service (2014). Статистические сведения по миграционной ситуации в Российской Федерации. (Statisticheskiye svedeniya po migratsionnoy situatsii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii/Statistical information on the migration situation in the Russian Federation). Available at: www.fms.gov.ru/about/statistics/data/ (accessed 19 August 2014).Google Scholar
Feenan, D. (2013). ‘Exploring the “socio” of socio-legal studies’. In Exploring the ‘Socio’ of Socio-Legal Studies, ed. Feenan, D.. London, Palgrave Macmillan: 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feifer, G. (1964). Justice in Moscow. New York, Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Fielding, N. G. (2013). ‘Lay people in court: The experience of defendants, eyewitnesses and victims’. The British Journal of Sociology 64(2): 287307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fomina, E. (2015a). ‘We were recognized as terrorists?’. Novaya Gazeta, 19 November. Available at: www.novayagazeta.ru/articles/2015/11/19/66441-171-nas-chto-za-terroristov-priznali-187 (accessed 2 March 2018).Google Scholar
Fomina, E. (2015b). ‘Today I’m so happy, we were released’. Novaya Gazeta, 23 November. Available at: www.novayagazeta.ru/articles/2015/11/23/66487-171-ya-segodnya-takaya-schastlivaya-nas-vypustili-187 (accessed 2 March 2018).Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York, Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1982). ‘The subject and power’. Critical Inquiry 8: 777795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedland, J. (2018). The great divide of our times is not left v right, but true v false. Guardian. 20 April. Available at: www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/apr/20/trump-us-syria-truth-tribal-robert-mueller-white-helmets-factse, accessed 16 November 2018.Google Scholar
Frohmann, B. (2008). ‘Documentary ethics, ontology, and politics’. Archival Science 8(3): 165180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, H. and Cullen, R. (2008). ‘Weiquan (rights protection) lawyering in an authoritarian state: Building a culture of public-interest lawyering’. The China Journal 59: 111127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fura, E. and Maruste, R. (2017). ‘Russia’s impact on the Strasbourg system, as seen by two former judges of the European Court of Human Rights’. In Russia and the European Court of Human Rights: The Strasbourg Effect, eds Mälksoo, L. and Benedek, W.. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 222251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gambino, L. (2018). ‘Trump policy of detaining children “may amount to torture”, UN says – as it happened’. Guardian. 22 June. Available at: www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2018/jun/22/trump-family-separation-crisis-immigration-border?page=with:block-5b2d5ce2e4b0385b28421e90#block-5b2d5ce2e4b0385b28421e90 (accessed 2 July 2018).Google Scholar
Gannushkina, S. A. (2014). ‘The most important changes in migration law of 2013 in Russia’. In Migration and Law seminar. Moscow, 24 May.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1975). Interpretations of Culture. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1983). Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. (2008). Nations and Nationalism. New York, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gibney, M. J. (2004). The Ethics and Politics of Asylum: Liberal Democracy and the Response to Refugees. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golash-Boza, T. (2010). ‘The criminalization of undocumented migrants: Legalities and realities’. Societies Without Borders 5(1): 8190.Google Scholar
Golubok, S. (2018). The challenges of the defence attorney. In British Association for Slavonic and East European Studies Annual Conference. Cambridge, 13–15 April.Google Scholar
Greenberg, I. (2007). Central Asians chase jobs and endure exploitation. New York Times, 15 May.Google Scholar
Guardian (2016). ‘UK must leave European convention on human rights, says Theresa May’. Available at: www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/apr/25/uk-must-leave-european-convention-on-human-rights-theresa-may-eu-referendum (accessed 18 April 2018).Google Scholar
Hagan, J. M. (1994). Deciding to be Legal. Philadelphia, PA, Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Hagan, J. M. (1998). ‘Networks, gender and immigrant incorporation: Resources and constraints’. American Sociological Review 63(1): 5567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajjar, L. (2001). ‘From the fight for legal rights to the promotion of human rights: Israeli and Palestinian cause lawyers in the trenches of globalization’. In Cause Lawyering and the State in a Global Era, eds Sarat, A. and Scheingold, S. A.. New York, Oxford University Press: 6895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. and Weicherding, M. (2014). ‘The “broken word”: Central Asia’s unreliable diplomatic assurances’. In Shelter from the Storm? The Asylum, Refugee and Extradition Situation Facing Activists from the Former Soviet Union in the CIS and Europe, ed. Hug, A.. London, Foreign Policy Centre: 2326.Google Scholar
Halliday, S. and Morgan, B. (2013). ‘I fought the law and the law won? Legal consciousness and the critical imagination’. Current Legal Problems 66(1): 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heathershaw, J. and Montgomery, D. W. (2014). The Myth of Post-Soviet Muslim Radicalization in the Central Asian Republics. London, Chatham House. Available at: www.chathamhouse.org/publication/myth-post-soviet-muslim-radicalization-central-asian-republics, accessed 22 May 2018.Google Scholar
Heimer, C. A. (2006). ‘Conceiving children: How documents support case versus biographical analyses’. In Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge, ed. Riles, A.. Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press: 95126.Google Scholar
Hein, J. and Beger, R. R. (2001a). ‘Immigrants, culture and American courts: A typology of legal strategies and issues in cases involving Vietnamese and Hmong litigants’. Criminal Justice Review 26(1): 3861.Google Scholar
Hein, J. and Beger, R. R. (2001b). ‘Legal adaptation among Vietnamese refugees in the United States: How international migrants litigate civil grievances during the resettlement process’. International Migration Review 35(2): 420448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendley, K. (2011). ‘Varieties of legal dualism: Making sense of the role of law in contemporary Russia’. Wisconsin International Law Journal 29(2): 233262.Google Scholar
Hendley, K. (2017). Everyday Law in Russia. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hetherington, K. (2008). ‘Populist transparency: The documentation of reality in rural Paraguay’. Journal of Legal Anthropology 1(1): 4569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilbink, T. M. (2004). ‘You know the type: Categories of cause lawyering’. Law & Social Inquiry 29(3): 657698.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld Davis, J. (2018). ‘Trump calls some unauthorized immigrants ‘animals’ in rant’. New York Times. 15 May. Available at: www.nytimes.com/2018/05/16/us/politics/trump-undocumented-immigrants-animals.html (accessed 1 June 2018).Google Scholar
Hobson, J. (2012). Body as Evidence: Mediating Race, Globalizing Gender. New York, SUNY Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollifield, J., Martin, P. L. and Orrenius, P. (2014). Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoshi, B. (2014). ‘Immigration Act 2014: Removals and nationality provisions’. Free Movement. Updates and commentary on immigration and asylum law. Available at: www.freemovement.org.uk/immigration-act-2014-removals-and-nationality-provisions (accessed 18 August 2014).Google Scholar
Hull, M. S. (2003). ‘The file: Agency, authority, and autography in an Islamabad bureaucracy’. Language & Communication 23(3): 287314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, M. S. (2012). ‘Documents and bureaucracy’. Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 251267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human Rights Watch (2009). Are you Happy to Cheat Us? Exploitation of Migration Construction Workers in Russia. New York, Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch (2013). Uzbekistan: Forced labor widespread in cotton harvest. Available at: www.hrw.org/news/2013/01/25/uzbekistan-forced-labor-widespread-cotton-harvest, accessed 22 May 2018.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch (2017). Central Asia: Make improving rights a priority. End torture; respect basic freedoms. Available at: www.hrw.org/news/2017/01/12/central-asia-make-improving-rights-priority, accessed 22 May 2018.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch (2018). Human Rights World Report: Kyrgyzstan. Washington, DC: Human Rights Watch. Available at: www.hrw.org/world-report/2018/country-chapters/kyrgyzstan, accessed on 11 July 2018.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2006). ‘Narratives of domestic violence’. Sydney Law Review 28(4): 733776.Google Scholar
International Commission of Jurists (2017). Transnational Injustices: National Security Transfers and International Law. Geneva, International Commission of Jurists.Google Scholar
Ivakhnyuk, I. (2009). The Russian Migration Policy and Its Impact on Human Development: The Historical Perspective. Geneva, United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
Ivakhniuk, I. (2014). ‘Eurasian migration system: Origins, vectors and trends’. In International Summer School: International Migration in the Post-Soviet Space – Reflections, Patterns and Implications. Koc University, Istanbul, 29 June–11 July.Google Scholar
Ivakhniuk, I. (2015). ‘Russian legislation on labour migration from 2007 to 2015: Trends and effects’. In Russia’s Migration Regulatory Regime: Migration Policy, Laws, Enforcement and Effects workshop, SOAS, London, 19 June.Google Scholar
Kahn, J. (2001). ‘Russian compliance with Articles Five and Six of the European Convention of Human Rights as a barometer of legal reform and human rights in Russia’. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 35(3): 641694.Google Scholar
Kahn, J. (2002). Federalism, Democratization, and the Rule of Law in Russia. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, J. (2004). ‘Russia’s “dictatorship of law” and the European Court of Human Rights’. Review of Central and East European Law 29(1): 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, J. (2006). ‘In Search for the rule of law in Russia’. Georgetown Journal of International Law 37: 353409.Google Scholar
Kahn, J. (2008). ‘Vladimir Putin and the rule of law in Russia’. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 36(3): 511558.Google Scholar
Kahn, J. (2010). ‘Adversarial principles and the case file in Russian criminal procedure’. In Russia and the Council of Europe: Ten Years After, eds Malfliet, K. and Parmentier, S.. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan: 107133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, J. (2018a). ‘After 20 years: Russia and the European Convention on Human Rights’. Lecture given at the Russian and Eurasian Studies Centre, St Anthony’s College, 12 February.Google Scholar
Kahn, J. (2018b). ‘The Richelieu effect: The Khodorkovsky case and political interference with justice’. In Sociology of Justice in Russia, eds Kurkchiyan, M. and Kubal, A.. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 231258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanstroom, D. (2000). ‘Deportation, social control, and punishment: Some thoughts about why hard laws make bad cases’. Harvard Law Review 113: 18901935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karatani, R. (2005). ‘How history separated refugee and migrant regimes: In search of their institutional origins’. International Journal of Refugee Law 17(3): 517541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, D. and Miles, R. (1988). ‘Refugees or migrant workers? The case of the European volunteer workers in Britain (1946–1951)’. Journal of Refugee Studies 1(3–4): 214236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, T. (2006). ‘Documented lives: Fear and the uncertainties of law during the second Palestinian intifada’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 12(1): 89107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsall, T. (2008). ‘Going with the grain in African development?Development Policy Review 26(6): 627655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondakov, A. (2017). ‘Queer coalitions: An examination of political resistance to the Russian migration law’. Europe-Asia Studies 69(8): 12221241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kononenko, V. and Moshes, A. (2011). Russia as a Network State: What Works in Russia When State Institutions Do Not? Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnan, J. K. (2006). ‘Lawyering for a cause and experiences from abroad’. California Law Review 94(2): 575615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubal, A. (2009). ‘Why semi-legal? Polish post-2004 EU enlargement migrants in the United Kingdom’. Journal of Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Law 23(2): 148164.Google Scholar
Kubal, A. (2012). Socio-Legal Integration: Polish Post-2004 EU Enlargement Migrants in the UK. Abingdon, Ashgate/Routledge.Google Scholar
Kubal, A. (2013). ‘Conceptualizing semi-legality in migration research’. Law & Society Review 47(3): 555587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubal, A. (2014). ‘Struggles against subjection: Implications of criminalization of migration for migrants’ everyday lives in Europe’. Crime Law and Social Change 62(2): 91111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubal, A. (2016a). ‘Refugees or migrant workers? A case study of undocumented Syrians in Russia – L.M. and Others v Russia (ECtHR 14 March 2016)’. Journal of Immigration Asylum and Nationality Law 30(4): 265282.Google Scholar
Kubal, A. (2016b). ‘Spiral effect of the law: Migrants’ experiences of the state law in Russia – a comparative perspective’. International Journal of Law in Context 12(4): 453468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubal, A. (2017). ‘Entry bar as surreptitious deportation? Zapret na v’ezd in Russian immigration law and practice: A comparative perspective’. Law & Social Inquiry 42(3): 744768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubal, A. (2018). ‘In search of justice: Migrants’ experiences of appeal in Moscow City Court’. In Sociology of Justice in Russia, eds Kurkchiyan, M. and Kubal, A.. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 92117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudaibergenova, D. T. and Shin, B. (2018). ‘Authors and authoritarianism in Central Asia: Failed agency and nationalising authoritarianism in Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan’. Asian Studies Review 42(2): 304322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurkchiyan, M. (2003). ‘The illegitimacy of law in post-Soviet societies’. In Law and Informal Practices: The Post-Communist Experience, eds Galligan, D. J. and Kurkchiyan, M.. Oxford, Oxford University Press: 2547.Google Scholar
Kurkchiyan, M. (2005). ‘Researching Russian legal culture’. In Theory and Method in Socio-Legal Research, eds Banakar, R. and Travers, M.. London, Hart: 259278.Google Scholar
Kurkchiyan, M. (2009). ‘Russian legal culture: An analysis of adaptive response to an institutional transplant’. Law & Social Inquiry 34(2): 337364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurkchiyan, M. (2018). ‘The professionalisation of law in the context of the Russian legal tradition’. In Sociology of Justice in Russia, eds Kurkchiyan, M. and Kubal, A.. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurchiyan, M. and Kubal, A. (2018a). ‘Administerial justice: Concluding remarks on the Russian legal tradition’. In Sociology of Justice in Russia, eds Kurkchiyan, M. and Kubal, A.. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 259277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurchiyan, M. and Kubal, A. (2018b). ‘Introduction: Exploring the diversity of experiences of justice in Russia’. In Sociology of Justice in Russia, eds Kurkchiyan, M. and Kubal, A.. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Toward a Radical Democratic Politics. London, Verso.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2009). The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil d’Etat. London, Polity.Google Scholar
Lavrysen, L. and Poppelwell-Scevak, C. (2018). ‘Poll: Best and Worst ECtHR Judgment of 2017’. Strasbourg Observers. Available at: https://strasbourgobservers.com/2018/01/11/poll-best-and-worst-ecthr-judgment-of-2017 (accessed 23 April 2018).Google Scholar
Ledeneva, A. (1998). Russia’s Economy of Favours: Blat, Networking and Informal Exchange. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ledeneva, A. (2006). ‘Behind the facade: “Telephone justice” in Putin’s Russia’. In Dictatorship or Reform? The Rule of Law in Russia, eds McAulley, M., Ledeneva, A. and Barnes, H.. London, Foreign Policy Centre: 2436.Google Scholar
Ledeneva, A. (2008). ‘Telephone justice in Russia’. Post-Soviet Affairs 24(4): 324350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledeneva, A. (2013). Can Russia Modernize? Sistema, Power Networks and Informal Governance. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legomsky, S. H. (2007). ‘The new path of immigration law: Asymmetric incorporation of criminal justice norms’. Washington & Lee Law Review 64(2): 469528.Google Scholar
Levi, R. and Valverde, M. (2008). ‘Studying law by association: Bruno Latour goes to the Conseil d’etat’. Law & Social Inquiry 33(3): 805825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levit, N. (2010). ‘Reshaping the narrative debate’. Seattle University Law Review 34: 751.Google Scholar
Lezaun, J. (2017). ‘Actor–network theory’. In Social Theory Now, eds Benzecry, C., Krause, M. and Reed, I. A.. Chicago, Chicago University Press: 305336.Google Scholar
Light, M. (2010). ‘Policing migration in Soviet and post-Soviet Moscow’. Post-Soviet Affairs 26(4): 275313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Light, M. (2012). ‘What does it mean to control migration? Soviet mobility policies in comparative perspective’. Law & Social Inquiry 37(2): 395429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Light, M. (2016). Fragile Migration Rights: Freedom of Movement in Post-Soviet Russia. London, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loescher, G. (2001). ‘The UNHCR and world politics: State interests vs. institutional autonomy’. International Migration Review 35(1): 3356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, K. (2013). ‘When refugees stopped being migrants: Movement, labour and humanitarian protection’. Migration Studies 1: 426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luban, D. (1988). Lawyers and Justice: An Ethical Study. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Maier, A. (2014). Tajik Migrants with Re-Entry Bans to the Russian Federation. Dushanbe, International Organization for Migration (IOM) – Mission in the Republic of Tajikistan. Available at: https://auca.kg/uploads/Migration_Database/Publications/Tajik_Migrants_Report_15Jan.pdf (accessed 19 June 2018).Google Scholar
Malakhov, V. S. (2014). ‘Russia as a new immigration country: Policy response and public debate’. Europe-Asia Studies 66(7): 10621079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mälksoo, L. (2014). ‘Concluding observations: Russia and European human-rights law – margins of the margin of appreciation’. In Russia and European Human-Rights Law: The Rise of the Civilizational Argument, ed. Mälksoo, L.. Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: 217227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mälksoo, L. and Benedek, W., eds (2017). Russia and the European Court of Human Rights: The Strasbourg Effect. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamouri, A. (2015). ‘Explainer: What is Hizb ut-Tahrir?’. The Conversation Available at: http://theconversation.com/explainer-what-is-hizb-ut-tahrir-37963 (accessed 1 June 2018).Google Scholar
Marochkin, S. (2017). ‘ECtHR and the Russian Constitutional Court: Duet or duel?’ In Russia and the European Court of Human Rights: The Strasbourg Effect, eds Mälksoo, L. and Benedek, W.. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 93124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massaro, T. M. (1989). ‘Empathy, legal storytelling, and the rule of law: New words, old wounds?Michigan Law Review 87(8): 20992127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuda, M. J. (1989). ‘Public response to racist speech: Considering the victim’s story’. Michigan Law Review 87(8): 23202381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matusevich, Y. (2018) ‘Russia’s catch-22 asylum system’. Refugees Deeply. Available at: www.newsdeeply.com/refugees/community/2018/01/29/russias-catch-22-asylum-system (accessed 2 June 2018).Google Scholar
McAulley, M., Ledeneva, A. and Barnes, H. (2006). Dictatorship or Reform? The Rule of Law in Russia. London, Foreign Policy Centre.Google Scholar
McCall, L. (2005). ‘The complexity of intersectionality’. Signs 30(3): 17711800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, L. (2018). ‘Decision-making in the Russian criminal justice system: Investigators, procurators, judges and human trafficking cases’. In Sociology of Justice in Russia, eds Kurkchiyan, M. and Kubal, A.. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 205230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEvoy, K. (2017). ‘Lawyering, professionalism & struggle in conflict & transition’. Annual Socio-Legal Lecture, University of Oxford, 4 May.Google Scholar
Menjívar, C. (2000). Fragmented Ties: Salvadoran Immigrant Networks in America. Berkeley, CA, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Menjívar, C. (2006). ‘Liminal legality: Salvadoran and Guatemalan immigrants’ lives in the United States’. American Journal of Sociology 111(4): 9991037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menjívar, C. (2014a). ‘Immigration law beyond borders: Externalizing and internalizing border controls in an era of securitization’. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 10: 353369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menjívar, C. (2014b). ‘The “poli-migra”: Multilayered legislation, enforcement practices, and what we can learn about and from today’s approaches’. American Behavioral Scientist 58(13): 18051819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menjívar, C. and Abrego, L. J. (2012). ‘Legal violence: Immigration law and the lives of Central American immigrants’. American Journal of Sociology 117(5): 13801421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, C. (1998). ‘The causes of cause lawyering: Toward an understanding of the motivation and commitment of social justice lawyers’. In Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities, eds Sarat, A. and Scheingold, S. A.. New York, Oxford University Press: 3168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, C. (2002). ‘When litigation is not the only way: Consensus building and mediation as public interest lawyering’. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy 10: 37.Google Scholar
Messina, C. and Shamshur, O. (1997). ‘Regional conference to address the problems of refugees, displaced persons, other forms of involuntary displacement and returnees in the countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States and relevant neighboring states’. The International Migration Review 31(2): 461467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morawetz, N. (1998). ‘Rethinking retroactive deportation laws and the due process clause’. New York University Law Review 73: 97161.Google Scholar
Munger, F. W. (2015). ‘Trafficking in law: Cause lawyer, bureaucratic state and rights of human trafficking victims in Thailand’. Asian Studies Review 39(1): 6987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natapoff, A. (2005). ‘Speechless: The silencing of criminal defendants’. New York University Law Review 80: 14491504.Google Scholar
Nelken, D. (2004). ‘Comparing legal cultures’. In The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society, ed. Sarat, A.. London, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nikiforova, E. and Brednikova, O. (2018). ‘On labor migration to Russia: Central Asian migrants and migrant families in the matrix of Russia’s bordering policies’. Political Geography 66: 142150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Barr, W. M. and Conley, J. M. (1985). ‘Litigant satisfaction versus legal adequacy in small claims court narratives’. Law and Society Review 19(4): 661702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Open Society Institute (2006). Ethnic Profiling in the Moscow Metro. New York, Open Society Institute.Google Scholar
Ortiz Maddali, A. (2011). ‘Padilla v Kentucky: A new chapter in Supreme Court jurisprudence on whether deportation constitutes punishment for lawful permanent residents?American University Law Review 61(1): 158.Google Scholar
Pastukhov, V. (2002). ‘Law under administrative pressure in post-Soviet Russia’. East European Constitutional Review 11(3): 6674.Google Scholar
Pels, D., Hetherington, K. and Vandenberghe, F. (2002). ‘The status of the object’. Theory, Culture & Society 19(5–6): 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perelman, J. (2005). ‘The way ahead-access-to-justice, public interest lawyering, and the right to legal aid in South Africa: The Nkuzi case’. Stanford Journal of International Law 41: 357.Google Scholar
Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the United Nations (2015). ‘Statement by the Representative of the Russian Federation at the 13th Coordination Meeting on International Migration’, 12 February. Available at: http://russiaun.ru/en/news/ga_intmgr (accessed 1 June 2018).Google Scholar
Pilkington, H. (1998). Migration, Displacement, and Identity in Post-Soviet Russia. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Polyanina, M. (2015). ‘The labour rights of migrant workers in Russia’. In Russia’s Migration Regulatory Regime: Migration Policy, Laws, Enforcement and Effects workshop, SOAS, London, 19 June.Google Scholar
Pomorski, S. (1998). ‘Reflections on the first criminal code of post-Communist Russia’. American Journal of Comparative Law 46: 375393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, A. (1998). ‘Norris, Schmidt, Green, Harris, Higginbotham, and Associates: The sociolegal import of Philadelphia cause lawyers’. In Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities, eds Sarat, A. and Scheingold, S. A.. New York, Oxford University Press: 151180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portes, A. and Bach, R. (1985). Latin Journey: Cuban and Mexican Immigrants in the United States. Berkeley, CA, University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portes, A. and Zhou, M. (1993). The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants. Berkeley, CA, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pound, R. (1910). ‘Law in books and law in action’. American Law Review 44: 1236.Google Scholar
Preclik, P. (2014). ‘Culture re-introduced: Contestation of human rights in contemporary Russia’. In Russia and European Human-Rights Law: The Rise of the Civilizational Argument, eds Mälksoo, L.. Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: 3189.Google Scholar
Press Unit ECtHR (2017). ‘Prisoners’ right to vote’. Factsheet of the European Court of Human Rights. Available at: www.echr.coe.int/Documents/FS_Prisoners_vote_ENG.pdf (accessed 5 April 2018): 1–6.Google Scholar
Press Unit ECtHR (2018). ‘Interim measures’. Factsheet of the European Court of Human Rights. Available at: www.echr.coe.int/Documents/FS_Interim_measures_ENG.pdf (accessed 5 April 2018).Google Scholar
Putin, V. (2005). ‘Introductory remarks at Security Council Meeting on immigration policy on 17 March 2005’. Available at: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/22861 (accessed 11 June 2018).Google Scholar
Rainsford, S. (2015). ‘Syrian migrant family in limbo at Moscow’s Sheremetyevo airport’. BBC News. Available at: www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-34657582 (accessed 1 March 2018).Google Scholar
Rasanayagam, J. (2014). ‘The politics of culture and the space for Islam: Soviet and post-Soviet imaginaries in Uzbekistan’. Central Asian Survey 33(1): 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, A. (2006). ‘Documents unfolding’. In Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge, ed. Riles, A.. Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press: 158177.Google Scholar
Reeves, M. (2013). ‘Clean fake: Authenticating documents and persons in migrant Moscow’. American Ethnologist 40(3): 508524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, M. (2015). ‘Living from the nerves: Deportability, indeterminacy, and the “feel of law” in migrant Moscow’. Social Analysis 59(4): 119136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, M. (2016). ‘The black list: On infrastructural indeterminacy and its reverberations’. In Infrastructures and Social Complexity: A Companion, eds Harvey, P., Jensen, C. P. and Morita, A. A.. Oxford, Routledge: 296308.Google Scholar
Rhodes, L. A. (2004). Total Confinement: Madness and Reason in the Maximum Security Prison. Berkeley, CA, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Riazantsev, S. V. (2007). Trudovaya migratsiya v stranakh SNG i Baltt: tendentsii, posledstviya, regulirovaniye [Labor migration in the CIS and Baltic States: Trends, consequences, regulation]. Moscow, Formula Prava (in Russian).Google Scholar
Riles, A. (1999). ‘Wigmore’s treasure box: Comparative law in the era of information’. Harvard International Law Journal 40(1): 221284.Google Scholar
Riles, A. (2000). The Network Inside Out. Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riva, S. (2018). ‘Encounters of US state violence at the border: Separation, confinement, and punishment of Central American asylum-seeking nuclear families’. Border Criminologies Blog. Available at: www.law.ox.ac.uk/research-subject-groups/centre-criminology/centreborder-criminologies/blog/2018/05/encounters-us (accessed 9 July 2018).Google Scholar
Roberts, D. (2017). ‘Donald Trump and the rise of tribal epistemology’. Vox. Available at: www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/3/22/14762030/donald-trump-tribal-epistemology (accessed 11 June 2018).Google Scholar
Romero, V. (2010). ‘Decriminializing border crossings’. Fordham Urban Law Review 38: 273302.Google Scholar
Rosstat – Federal State Statistics Service (2018). Social and Economic Situation of Russia. Moscow, Rosstat [Federal’na sluzhba gosudarstvennoy statistiki]. Available at: www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/publications/catalog/doc_1140086922125 (accessed 1 June 2018).Google Scholar
Round, J. and Kuznetsova, I. (2016). ‘Necropolitics and the migrant as a political subject of disgust: The precarious everyday of Russia’s labour migrants’. Critical Sociology. DOI: 10.1177/0896920516645934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruget, V. and Usmanalieva, B. (2008). ‘Citizenship, migration and loyalty towards the state: A case study of the Kyrgyzstani migrants working in Russia and Kazakhstan’. Central Asian Survey 27(2): 129141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruget, V. and Usmanalieva, B. (2010). ‘How much is citizenship worth? The case of Kyrgyzstani migrants in Kazakhstan and Russia’. Citizenship Studies 14(4): 445459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakwa, R. (2009). The Quality of Freedom: Khodorkovsky, Putin, and the Yukos Affair. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakwa, R. (2010). ‘The dual state in Russia’. Post-Soviet Affairs 26(3): 185206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salcido, O. and Menjívar, C. (2012). ‘Gendered paths to legal citizenship: The case of Latin-American immigrants in Phoenix, Arizona’. Law & Society Review 46(2): 335368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, A. (1998). ‘Between (the presence of) violence and (the possibility of) justice: Lawyering against capital punishment’. In Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities, eds Sarat, A. and Scheingold, S. A.. New York, Oxford University Press: 317346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, A. and Kearns, T. R. (1995). Law in Everyday Life. Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, A. and Scheingold, S. A. (1998a). ‘Cause lawyering and the reproduction of professional authority: An introduction’. In Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities, eds Sarat, A. and Scheingold, S. A.. New York, Oxford University Press: 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, A. and Scheingold, S. A., eds (1998b). Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities. New York, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, A. and Scheingold, S. A., eds (2001a). Cause Lawyering and the State in a Global Era. New York, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, A. and Scheingold, S. A. (2001b). ‘State transformation, globalisation, and the possibilities of cause lawyering: An introduction’. In Cause Lawyering and the State in a Global Era, eds Sarat, A. and Scheingold, S. A.. New York, Oxford University Press: 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, A. and Scheingold, S. A. (2006). Cause Lawyers and Social Movements. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, A., Douglas, L. and Umphrey, M. M., eds (2011a). Law as Punishment/Law as Regulation. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, A., Douglas, L. and Umphrey, M. M. (2011b). ‘On the blurred boundary between regulation and punishment’. In Law as Punishment/Law as Regulation, eds Sarat, A., Douglas, L. and Umphrey, M. M.. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press: 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkorova, A. (2015). ‘Zarina Yunusova: “I will never forgive what was done to me”’. BBC Russian Service Dushanbe. Translated by ‘The Russian Reader’. Available at: https://therussianreader.com/tag/umarali-nazarov (accessed 9 July 2018).Google Scholar
Sayeed, S. (2014). ‘Appeals provisions of the Immigration Act 2014’. Free Movement. Updates and commentary on immigration and asylum law. Available at: www.freemovement.org.uk/appeals-provisions-of-the-immigration-act-2014 (accessed 19 August 2014).Google Scholar
Scheffer, T. (2007). ‘File work, legal care, and professional habitus: An ethnographic reflection on different styles of advocacy’. International Journal of the Legal Profession 14(1): 5780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheingold, S. (2001). ‘Cause lawyering and democracy in transnational perspective’. In Cause Lawyering and the State in a Global Era, eds Sarat, A. and Scheingold, S. A.. New York, Oxford University Press: 382405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheingold, S. and Bloom, A. (1998). ‘Transgressive cause lawyering: Practice sites and the politicization of the professional’. International Journal of the Legal Profession 5(2–3): 209253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheingold, S. and Sarat, A. (2004). Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism and Cause Lawyering. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Schenk, C. (2018). Why Control Immigration? Strategic Uses of Migration Management in Russia. Toronto, University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheppele, K. L. (1989). ‘Foreword: Telling stories’. Michigan Law Review 87(8): 20732098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuck, P. (1984). ‘The transformation of American immigration law’. Columbia Law Review 84(1): 2527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J. (1985). Weapons of the Weak. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Serov, V. (2003), Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ krylatykh slov i vyrazheniy. Moscow, Lokid Press. Available at: https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/dic_wingwords/141/%D0%91%D0%B5%D0%B7 (accessed 16 October 2017).Google Scholar
Shamir, R. and Chinski, S. (1998). ‘Destruction of houses and construction of a cause: Lawyers and Bedouins in Israeli courts’. In Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities, eds Sarat, A. and Scheingold, S. A.. New York, Oxford University Press: 227260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shevel, O. (2011a). Migration, Refugee Policy, and State Building in Postcommunist Europe. New York, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shevel, O. (2011b). ‘The Russian Federation’. In Migration, Refugee Policy, and State Building in Postcommunist Europe. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 73133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegelbaum, L. H. and Moch, L. P. (2014). Broad is my Native Land: Repertoires and Regimes of Migration in Russia’s Twentieth Century. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sigona, N. (2012). ‘“I’ve got too much baggage”: The impact of legal status on the social worlds of irregular migrants’. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale 20(1): 5065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silbey, S. (2010). ‘J. Locke, op. cit.: Invocations of law on snowy streets’. Journal of Comparative Law 5(2): 66.Google Scholar
Silvestri, A. and Tchernishova, O. (1998). ‘The legal framework regulating asylum in the Russian Federation’. International Journal of Refugee Law 10(1–2): 184198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmel, G. (1994). ‘Bridge and door’. Theory, Culture & Society 11(1): 510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. B. (1996). Reforming the Russian Legal System. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, P. (2005). ‘Informal practices in Russian governance: Courts and law enforcement’. In Europe - Our Common Home? ICEEES VII World Congress, Berlin, 29–31 October.Google Scholar
Starzhenetskii, V. (2014). ‘Assessing human rights in Russia: Not to miss the forest for the trees – a response to Preclik, Schönfeld and Hallinan’. In Russia and European Human-Rights Law: The Rise of the Civilizational Argument, ed. Mälksoo, L.. Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: 207215.Google Scholar
Steiker, C. (1997). ‘Punishment and procedure: Punishment theory and the criminal-civil procedural divide’. Georgetown Law Journal 85(4): 775819.Google Scholar
Sterett, S. (1998). ‘Caring about individual cases: Immigration lawyering in Britain’. In Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities, eds Sarat, A. and Scheingold, S. A.. New York, Oxford University Press: 3168.Google Scholar
Stumpf, J. (2006). ‘The crimmigration crisis: Immigrants, crime, and sovereign power’. American University Law Review 56(2): 367419.Google Scholar
Tam, W. (2010). ‘Political transition and the rise of cause lawyering: The case of Hong Kong’. Law & Social Inquiry 35(3): 663687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G. H. (2007). ‘Derrick Bell’s narratives as parables’. New York University Review of Law and Social Change 31: 255271.Google Scholar
Ticktin, M. (2006). ‘Where ethics and politics meet’. American Ethnologist 33(1): 3349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Transparency International (2007). Global Corruption Report 2007: Corruption in Judicial Systems. New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Travers, M. (1999). British Immigration Courts: A Study of Law and Politics. Bristol, The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Trenina, D. (2014). ‘Extradition and expulsion of persons from Russia to countries of Central Asia’. In Shelter from the Storm? The Asylum, Refugee and Extradition Situation Facing Activists from the Former Soviet Union in the CIS and Europe, ed. Hug, A.. London, Foreign Policy Centre: 1722.Google Scholar
Trenina, D. and Zharinov, K. (2017). ‘From Russia to torture: Lack of or deficient remedies against prohibited treatment in extradition and other types of removal proceedings’. In Closing the Door: The Challenge Facing Activists from the Former Soviet Union Seeking Asylum or Refuge, ed. Hug, A.. London, Foreign Policy Centre: 3842.Google Scholar
Trochev, A. (2012). ‘Suing Russia at Home’. Problems of Post-Communism 59(5): 1834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troitskiy, K. (2017). ‘39 persons granted refugee status in 2016: Russian anti-records and why Malta is stronger than Russia?’ [39 priznannykh bezhentsev v 2016 godu. Rossiyskiye antirekordy i pochemu Mal’ta sil’neye Rossii]. Civic Assistance Committee. Available at: https://refugee.ru/publications/39-priznannyh-bezhentsev-v-2016-godu-rossijskie-antirekordy-i-pochemu-malta-silnee-rossii (accessed 1 June 2018).Google Scholar
Troitskiy, K. (2018). ‘The degradation of the institution of asylum in Russia and the new anti-record of migration services: Statistics for 2017 and brief analysis’ [Degradatsiya instituta ubezhishcha v Rossii i novyye antirekordy migratsionnykh sluzhb: statistika za 2017 god i yeye kratkaya analitika]. Civic Assistance Committee. Available at: https://refugee.ru/publications/degradatsiya-instituta-ubezhishha-v-rossii (accessed 20 June 2018).Google Scholar
Trubek, L. and Kransberger, E. M. (1998). ‘Critical lawyers: Social justice and the structures of private practice’. In Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities, eds Sarat, A. and Scheingold, S. A.. New York, Oxford University Press: 201226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tseytlina, O. (2018). ‘The problem of restricting the freedom of foreign citizens and stateless persons in the light of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation’. In Stateless Persons in the Temporary Detention Centers for Foreign Nationals of the Ministry of the Interior: Statistics, Legislation, Law Enforcement, eds Burtina, E. and Tseytlina, O.. Moscow, Human Rights Centre Memorial: 2343.Google Scholar
Tuitt, P. (2005). ‘Legal practice and modes of dying: Bruno Latour, technology and the critical legal instance’. Law and Critique 16(1): 113129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Population Divison (UNPD) (2017). ‘International migration stock 2017’. Available at: www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/data/estimates2/estimates17.shtml (accessed on 6 November 2018).Google Scholar
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) (no date). ‘UNHCR’s mandate for refugees, stateless persons and IDPs.’ In UNHCR Emergency Handbook. Geneva: UNHCR. Available at: https://emergency.unhcr.org/entry/113370/unhcrs-mandate-for-refugees-stateless-persons-and-idps (accessed 1 November 2018).Google Scholar
United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) (2008). ‘Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development: Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights of Migrants. Addendum mission to the United States of America. J. Bustamante’. United Nations Human Rights Council.Google Scholar
Urinboyev, R. (2016). ‘Migration and transnational informality in post-Soviet societies: Ethnographic study of po rukam (“handshake”) experiences of Uzbek migrant workers in Moscow’. In Migrant Workers in Russia, eds Heusala, A.-L. and Aitamurto, K.. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Vakulenko, E. and Leukhin, R. (2017). ‘Wage discrimination against foreign workers in Russia’. Russian Journal of Economics 3(1): 83100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Woude, M. (2016). ‘Starting to decipher Dutch border practices’. Border Criminologies Blog. Available at: www.law.ox.ac.uk/research-subject-groups/centre-criminology/centreborder-criminologies/blog/2016/02/starting-decipher (accessed 12 June 2018).Google Scholar
Van Hear, N. (2004). ‘I went as far as my money would take me: Conflict, forced migration and class’. COMPAS Working Paper Series WP-04–06.Google Scholar
Van Hear, N., Brubaker, R. and Bessa, T. (2009). ‘Managing mobility for human development: The growing salience of mixed migration’. Human Development Research Paper 2009/20.Google Scholar
van Oorschot, I. (2014). ‘Seeing the case clearly: File-work, material mediation, and visualizing practices in a Dutch criminal court’. Symbolic Interaction 37(4): 439457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Oorschot, I. and Schinkel, W. (2015). ‘The legal case file as border object: On self-reference and other-reference in criminal law’. Journal of Law and Society 42(4): 499527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vismann, C. (2008). Files: Law and Media Technology. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Woolgar, S. (2002). ‘After word? On some dynamics of duality interrogation’. Theory, Culture & Society 19(5–6): 261270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2016). ‘Personal remittances, received (% of GDP)’. In World Bank Staff Estimates Based on IMF Balance of Payments Data, and World Bank and OECD GDP Estimates. New York, World Bank. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.TRF.PWKR.DT.GD.ZS?end=2016&start=1970 (accessed 14 June 2018).Google Scholar
Yeo, C. (2014). ‘Serious and irreversible harm and deportation appeals’. Free Movement. Updates and commentary on immigration and asylum law. Available at: www.freemovement.org.uk/serious-and-irreversible-harm-and-deportation-appeals (accessed 18 August 2014).Google Scholar
Yudina, T. N. (2005). ‘Labour migration into Russia: The response of state and society’. Current Sociology 53(4): 583606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yusupova, G. and Ponarin, E. (2016). ‘Social remittances in religion’. Problems of Post-Communism 65: 188200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Agnieszka Kubal, University College London
  • Book: Immigration and Refugee Law in Russia
  • Online publication: 25 March 2019
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Agnieszka Kubal, University College London
  • Book: Immigration and Refugee Law in Russia
  • Online publication: 25 March 2019
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Agnieszka Kubal, University College London
  • Book: Immigration and Refugee Law in Russia
  • Online publication: 25 March 2019
Available formats
×