Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T19:27:44.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2018

Jonathan Wallis
Jonathan Wallis
Affiliation:
University of Tasmania
Get access

Summary

This chapter presents an epilogue for the monograph in the form of a brief reading of Propertius 3.22. The epilogue argues that in 3.22 Propertius presents the culmination of a programme in Book 3 to reinvent elegiac amor as a poetic theme with overt social capacity. An address to his former patron Tullus links this poem with Book 1, where love had been a signature point of distinction between elegiac indolence and patriotic duty; now Propertius reworks elegiac amor as married love, and so as the epitome of Augustan patriotism. 3.22 also presents the resolution of Propertius’s engagement in Book 3 with the contemporary poetry of Horace and Virgil: a reinvented elegiac voice seemingly surpasses the ethical tone of Horatian lyric and the celebration of Augustan clemency at the heart of the Aeneid.
Type
Chapter
Information
Introspection and Engagement in Propertius
A Study of Book 3
 , pp. 225 - 235
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J. N. (1982) The Latin Sexual Vocabulary. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Alfonsi, L. (1961) ‘L’Antiope di Pacuvio e Properzio III 15,’ Dioniso 35/2: 5–10.Google Scholar
Austin, R. G. (1977) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Sextus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Baker, R. J. (1968a) ‘Miles annosus: The Military Motif in Propertius,’ Latomus 27: 322–49.Google Scholar
Baker, R. J. (1968b) ‘Propertius III 1, 1–6 Again: Intimations of Immortality?,’ Mnemosyne 21: 35–9.Google Scholar
Baker, R. J. (1969) ‘Propertius’ Lost Bona,’ AJPh 95: 333–7.Google Scholar
Balot, R. K. (1998) ‘Pindar, Virgil, and the Proem to “Georgic” 3,’ Phoenix 52: 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2005) ‘Learned Eyes: Poets, Viewers, Image Makers,’ in Galinksy, K. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus, 281–305. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2007) ‘Carmina: Odes and Carmen Saeculare,’ in S. J. Harrison, (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Horace, 144–61. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Barsby, J. A. (1974) ‘The Composition and Publication of the First Three Books of Propertius,’ G&R 21: 128–37.Google Scholar
Barsby, J. A. (1975) ‘Propertius III.20,’ Mnemosyne 28: 30–9.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. (2006) The Mirror of the Self: Sexuality, Self-Knowledge, and the Gaze in the Early Roman Empire. Chicago.Google Scholar
Batinski, E. E. (1991) ‘Horace’s Rehabilitation of Bacchus,’ CW 84: 361–78.Google Scholar
Becker, C. (1971) ‘Die späten Elegien des Properz,’ Hermes 99: 449–80.Google Scholar
Bennett, A. W. (1968) ‘The Patron and Political Inspiration,’ Hermes 96: 318–40.Google Scholar
Bennett, A. W. (1972) ‘The Elegiac Lie: Propertius 1.15,’ Phoenix 26: 28–39.Google Scholar
Biddau, F. (2005) ‘“Redeamus in orbem”: Nota a Properzio 3, 2, 1–2,’ MD 55: 185–91.Google Scholar
Boucher, J.-P. (1965) Études sur Properce: Problèmes d’inspiration et d’art. Paris.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. (1986) The Chaonian Dove: Studies in the Eclogues, Georgics and Aeneid of Virgil. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, K. R. (1987) Slaves and Masters in the Roman Empire: A Study in Social Control. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bradley, K. R. (1994) Slavery and Society at Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, A. (1978) ‘Horace and the Therapeutic Myth: Odes 3,7; 3,11; and 3,27,’ Hermes 106: 156–76.Google Scholar
Bramble, J. C. (1973) ‘Critical Appreciations 1: Propertius iii.10,’ G&R 20: 155–61.Google Scholar
Breed, B. (2010) ‘Propertius on Not Writing about Civil Wars,’ in Breed, B., Damon, C. & Rossi, A. (eds.) Citizens of Discord: Rome and Its Civil Wars, 233–48. Oxford.Google Scholar
Brouwers, J. H. (2006) ‘On the Summary of the Adventures of Odysseus in Propertius 3.12,’ in Lardinois, A. P. M. H., van der Poel, M. G. M. & Hunink, V. (eds) Land of Dreams: Greek and Latin Studies in Honour of A. H. M. Kessels, 215–28. Leiden.Google Scholar
Buchheit, V. (1972) Der Anspruch des Dichters in Vergils Georgika: Dichtertum und Heilsweg. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Burck, E. (1959) ‘Abschied von der Liebesdichtung (Properz 3, 24 und 3, 25),’ Hermes 87: 191–211.Google Scholar
Burke, P. F. (1979) ‘Roman Rites for the Dead and “Aeneid 6”,’ CJ 74: 220–8.Google Scholar
Butler, H. E. & Barber, E. A. (1933) The Elegies of Propertius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Butrica, J. L. (1983) ‘Propertius 3.6,’ EMC 27: 17–37.Google Scholar
Butrica, J. L. (1994) ‘Myth and Meaning in Propertius 3.15,’ Phoenix 48/2: 135–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butrica, J. L. (1996) ‘The Amores of Propertius: Unity and Structure in Books 2–4,’ ICS 21: 87–158.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (1971) ‘Propertius 3,10 and Roman Birthdays,’ Hermes 99: 149–55.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (1972) Generic Composition in Greek and Roman Poetry. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (1979) Tibullus: A Hellenistic Poet at Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (1995) ‘Horace, Odes 3.7: Elegy, Lyric, Myth, Learning, and Interpretation,’ in Harrison, S. J. (ed.) Homage to Horace: A Bimillenary Celebration, 65–99. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (2006) Sextus Propertius: The Augustan Elegist. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (2010) ‘The Mistress’s Midnight Summons: Propertius 3.16,’ Hermes 138: 70–91.Google Scholar
Camps, W. A. (1966) Propertius, Elegies Book III. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Camps, W. A. (1967) Propertius, Elegies Book II. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Castriota, D. (1995) The Ara Pacis Augustae and the Imagery of Abundance in Later Greek and Early Roman Imperial Art. Princeton.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. (2004) ‘“Goodbye to All That”: Propertius’ magnum iter between Elegies 3.16 and 3.21,’ Mouseion 4: 127–43.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. (2004) ‘Assisi, Roma, Tivoli: I luoghi di Properzio,’ in Santini, C. & Santucci, F. (eds) Properzio tra storia arte mito: Atti del convegno internazionale. Assisi, 24–26 maggio 2002, 99–115. Assisi.Google Scholar
Comber, M. (1998) ‘A Book Made New: Reading Propertius Reading Pound. A Study in Reception,’ JRS 88: 37–55.Google Scholar
Commager, S. (1962) The Odes of Horace: A Critical Study. New Haven.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2000) ‘Asymptotes of Pleasure: Thoughts on the Nature of Roman Erotic Elegy,’ Arethusa 33: 71–98.Google Scholar
Connor, P. J. (1971) ‘Enthusiasm, Poetry, and Politics: A Consideration of Horace, Odes, III.25,’ AJPh 92/2: 266–74.Google Scholar
Conte, G.B. (1992) ‘Proems in the Middle,’ YClS 29: 147–59.Google Scholar
Conte, G.B. (1994a) Genres and Readers. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Conte, G.B. (1994b) Latin Literature: A History. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. (1968) ‘The Structure of Propertius Book 1 and Some Textual Consequences,’ Phoenix 22: 250–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtney, E. (1970) ‘The Structure of Propertius Book 3,’ Phoenix 24: 48–53.Google Scholar
Crowther, N. B. (1979) ‘Water and Wine as Symbols of Inspiration,’ Mnemosyne 32: 1–11.Google Scholar
Davis, G. (1975) ‘The Persona of Licymnia: A Revaluation of Horace, Carm. 2.12,’ Philologus 119: 70–83.Google Scholar
Davis, G. (1991) Polyhymnia: The Rhetoric of Horatian Lyric Discourse. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Davis, G. (2005) ‘From Lyric to Elegy: The Inscription of the Elegiac Subject in Heroides 15 (Sappho to Phaon),’ in Batstone, W. W. & Tissol, G. (eds) Defining Genre and Gender in Latin Literature: Essays Presented to William S. Anderson on His Seventy-Fifth Birthday, 175–91. New York.Google Scholar
DeBrohun, J. B. (2003) Roman Propertius and the Reinvention of Elegy. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Eder, W. (2005) ‘Augustus and the Power of Tradition,’ in Galinsky, K. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus, 13–32. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Falkner, T. M. (1977) ‘Myth, Setting, and Immortality in Propertius 3.18,’ CJ 73: 11–18.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2000) ‘Roman Elegy: Problems of Self-Definition, and Redirection,’ L’Histoire Littéraire Immanente dans la Poésie Latine, Tome 47, 183–211.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2006) ‘The Image of Women in Propertius’ Poetry,’ in Günther, H.-C. (ed.) Brill’s Companion to Propertius, 183–98. Leiden.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. & Hunter, R. (2004) Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (2003) ‘Classical Genre in Theory and Practice,’ New Literary History 34: 383–408.Google Scholar
Fear, T. (2005) ‘Propertian Closure: The Elegiac Inscription of the Liminal Male and Ideological Contestation in Augustan Rome,’ in Ancona, R. & Greene, E. (eds) Gendered Dynamics in Latin Love Poetry, 13–40. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (1984) Propertius. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (1985) Sesto Properzio, Il Libro Terzo delle Elegie. Bari.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (2005) Properzio, Elegie Libro II. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (1986) ‘History and Revelation in Vergil’s Underworld,’ PCPhS 32: 1–24.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. (1995) Catullan Provocations: Lyric Poetry and the Drama of Position. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. (2000) Slavery and the Roman Literary Imagination. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (1989) ‘First Thoughts on Closure: Problems and Prospects,’ MD 22: 75–122.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (1995) ‘Horace and the Aesthetics of Politics,’ in Harrison, S. J. (ed.) Homage to Horace: A Bimillenary Celebration, 248–66. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (2000) Roman Constructions: Readings in Postmodern Latin. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (2002) ‘Masculinity under Threat? The Poetics and Politics of Inspiration in Latin Poetry,’ in Spentzou, E. & Fowler, D. P. (eds) Cultivating the Muse: Struggles for Power and Inspiration in Classical Literature, 141–60. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (1957) Horace. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gale, M. (2000) Virgil on the Nature of Things: The Georgics, Lucretius and the Didactic Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. (1969) ‘The Triumph Theme in the Augustan Elegy,’ WS 82: 75–107.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. (2006) ‘Politics of Moderation in Ars Amatoria 3,’ in Gibson, R. K., Green, S. & Sharrock, A. R. (eds) The Art of Love: Bimillennial Essays on Ovid’s Ars Amatoria and Remedia Amoris, 121–42. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. (2007) Excess and Restraint: Propertius, Horace, and Ovid’s Ars Amatoria. London.Google Scholar
Gold, B. K. (1982) ‘Propertius 3.9: Maecenas as eques, dux, fautor,’ in Gold, B. K. (ed.) Literary and Artistic Patronage in Ancient Rome, 103–17. Austin.Google Scholar
Gold, B. K. (1993) ‘“But Ariadne Was Never There in the First Place”: Finding the Female in Roman Poetry,’ in Rabinowitz, N. S. & Richlin, A. (eds) Feminist Theory and the Classics, 75–101. London.Google Scholar
Gold, B. K. (2007) ‘The Silence of Women in Propertius,’ Antichthon 41: 54–72.Google Scholar
Goold, G. P. (1990) The Elegies of Propertius. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Greene, E. (1995) ‘Elegiac Woman: Fantasy, materia and Male Desire in Propertius 1.3 and 1.11,’ AJPh 116/2: 303–18.Google Scholar
Greene, E. (1998) The Erotics of Domination: Male Desire and the Mistress in Latin Love Poetry. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Greene, E. (2000) ‘Gender Identity and the Elegiac Hero in Propertius 2.1,’ Arethusa 33: 241–61.Google Scholar
Greene, E. (2005) ‘Gender and Genre in Propertius 2.8 and 2.9,’ in Batstone, W. W. & Tissol, G. (eds) Defining Genre and Gender in Latin Literature: Essays Presented to William S. Anderson on His Seventy-Fifth Birthday, 211–38. New York.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. (1977) ‘Propertius and Antony,’ JRS 67: 17–26.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. (1985) Latin Poets and Roman Life. Duckworth.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (2005) ‘Augustus and the Making of the Principate,’ in Galinsky, K. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus, 33–51. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Günther, H.-C. (2006) ‘The Fourth Book,’ in Günther, H.-C. (ed.) Brill’s Companion to Propertius, 353–95. Leiden.Google Scholar
Gurval, R. A. (1995) Actium and Augustus: The Politics and Emotions of Civil War. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. (1998) The Politics of Latin Literature. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallett, J. P. (1973) ‘The Role of Women in Roman Elegy: Counter-Cultural Feminism,’ Arethusa 6: 103–24.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (1988) ‘Horace, Odes 3.7: An Erotic Odyssey?’ CQ 38: 186–92.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2004) ‘Lyric Middles: The Turn at Centre in Horace’s Odes,’ in Kyriakidis, S. & De Martino, F. (eds) Middles in Latin Poetry, 81–102. Bari.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2006) Generic Enrichment in Vergil and Horace. Oxford.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2007) ‘The Primal Voyage and the Ocean of Epos: Two Aspects of Metapoetic Imagery in Catullus, Virgil and Horace,’ Dictynna 4: 1–17.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (1998) Fighting for Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. (1994) ‘Some Allusions to Callimachus in Latin Poetry,’ MD 33: 51–79.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. (1995) ‘Propertius: Division, Transmission, and the Editor’s Task,’ Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 8: 165–85.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. (2007a) Sexti Properti Elegos. Oxford.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. (2007b) Cynthia: A Companion to the Text of Propertius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. (2007c) ‘Propertius, Patronage and Politics,’ BICS 50: 93–128.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. (2010) ‘An Elegist’s Career: From Cynthia to Cornelia,’ in Hardie, P. R. & Moore, H. (eds) Classical Literary Careers and their Literary Reception, 89–104. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. & Morwood, J. H. W. (2011) A Commentary on Propertius: Book 3. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1985) ‘Booking the Return Trip: Ovid and Tristia 1,’ PCPhS 31: 13–32.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1987) The Metamorphosis of Persephone: Ovid and the Self-Conscious Muse. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1998) Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (2000) ‘Essential Epic: Genre and Gender from Macer to Statius,’ in Depew, M. & Obbink, D. (eds) Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons and Society, 221–44. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. M. (1982) ‘The Structure and Purpose of Vergil’s Parade of Heroes,’ AncSoc 12: 12–18.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. M. (1991) ‘Virgil and the Poetry of Explanations,’ G&R 38: 203–11.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. M. (2001) ‘Virgil Reads; Octavia Faints: Grounds for Doubt,’ Proceedings of the Virgil Society 24: 135–37.Google Scholar
Houghton, L. B. T. (2007) ‘The Drowned and the Saved: Shipwrecks and the cursus of Latin Love Elegy,’ CCJ (PCPS) 53: 161–79.Google Scholar
Hubbard, M. (1974) Propertius. Bristol.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2006) The Shadow of Callimachus: Studies in the Reception of Hellenistic Poetry at Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (1984) ‘Propertius and the Unity of the Book,’ JRS 74: 99–106.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2002) ‘The Publication and Individuality of Horace’s Odes Books 1–3,’ CQ 52: 517–37.Google Scholar
Jacobson, H. (1976) ‘Structure and Meaning in Propertius Book 3,’ ICS 1: 160–73.Google Scholar
James, S. L. (1998) ‘Introduction: Constructions of Gender and Genre in Roman Comedy and Elegy,’ Helios 25: 1–16.Google Scholar
James, S. L. (2003a) ‘Her Turn to Cry: The Politics of Weeping in Roman Love Elegy,’ TAPhA 133: 99–122.Google Scholar
James, S. L. (2003b) Learned Girls and Male Persuasion: Gender and Reading in Roman Love Elegy. Berkeley.Google Scholar
James, S. L. (2006) ‘A Courtesan’s Choreography: Female Liberty and Male Anxiety at the Roman Dinner Party,’ in Faraone, C. A. & McClure, L. K. (eds) Prostitutes and Courtesans in the Ancient World, 224–51. Madison.Google Scholar
Janan, M. (2001) The Politics of Desire: Propertius IV. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. R. (1976) Darkness Visible: A Study of Virgil’s Aeneid. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. R. (2009) A Latin Lover in Ancient Rome: Readings in Propertius and His Genre. Columbus.Google Scholar
Karamalengou, H. (2003) ‘Poétique ou poétiques chez les poètes augustéens?,’ REL 81: 133–56.Google Scholar
Keith, A. M. (1994) ‘Corpus Eroticum: Elegiac Poetics and Elegiac Puellae in Ovid’s Amores,’ CW 88: 27–40.Google Scholar
Keith, A. M. (2008) Propertius: Poet of Love and Leisure. London.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (1992) ‘“Augustan” and “Anti-Augustan”: Reflections of Terms of Reference,’ in Powell, A. (ed.) Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus, 26–58. Bristol.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (1993) The Arts of Love: Five Studies in the Discourse of Roman Love Elegy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kirichenko, A. (2013) ‘Virgil’s Augustan Temples: Image and Intertext in the Aeneid,’ JRS 103: 1–23.Google Scholar
Knox, P. E. (1985) ‘Wine, Water, and Callimachean Polemics,’ HSPh 99: 107–19.Google Scholar
Koniaris, G. L. (1971) ‘On Propertius 3.24: A Reply,’ CP 66: 253–8.Google Scholar
Kraggerud, E. (1998) ‘Vergil Announcing the Aeneid: On Georgics 3.1–48,’ in Stahl, H. P. (ed.) Vergil’s Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context, 1–20. London.Google Scholar
Kyriakidis, S. & De Martino, F. (eds) (2004) Middles in Latin Poetry. Bari.Google Scholar
Lardinois, A. P. M. H., van der Poel, M. G. M. & Hunink, V. (eds) (2006) Land of Dreams: Greek and Latin Studies in Honour of A. H. M. Kessels. Leiden.Google Scholar
Lee, G. (1996) Propertius: The Poems. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (1991) ‘Propertius Pindaricus: Der Sinn der Elegie 3,17 und ihr Verhältnis zu 3,18,’ Studi di filologia classica in onore di Giusto Monaco (Palermo), ii: 1001–5.Google Scholar
Lieberg, G. (1999) ‘Formale und inhaltliche Analyse von Properz III,12,’ Latomus 58: 785–98.Google Scholar
Lieberg, G. (2006) ‘Properz’ Elegie III, 20 als Offene Form,’ Latomus 65: 954–60.Google Scholar
Lilja, S. (1965) The Roman Elegists’ Attitude toward Women. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Littlewood, R. J. (1975) ‘Two Elegiac Hymns: Propertius, 3.17 and Ovid, Fasti, 5.663–692,’ Latomus 34: 662–74.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (1997) Horace’s Narrative Odes. Oxford.Google Scholar
Luck, G. (1957) ‘The Cave and the Source,’ CQ 51: 175–9.Google Scholar
Luck, G. (1969) The Latin Love Elegy. London.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1980) The Latin Love Poets: From Catullus to Horace. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1995) Horace: Behind the Public Poetry. New Haven.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1998a) ‘Propertius and Tibullus: Early Exchanges,’ CQ 48/2: 519–44.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1998b) ‘Propertius 2.10 and 11 and the Structure of Books “2A” and “2B”,’ JRS 88: 21–36.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. & Morwood, J. H. W. (1973) ‘Critical Appreciations 1: Propertius iii.10,’ G&R 20: 38–48.Google Scholar
Mader, G. (1993) ‘Architecture, Aemulatio and Elegiac Self-Definition in Propertius 3.2,’ CJ 88/4: 321–40.Google Scholar
Mader, G. (1994) ‘Propertius’ Hymn to Bacchus (3, 17) and the Poetic Design of the Third Book,’ Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 7: 369–85.Google Scholar
Maltby, R. (1981) ‘Love and Marriage in Propertius 4,3,’ in Cairns, F. (ed.) Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar: 3rd Volume, 243–7. Liverpool.Google Scholar
Marr, J. L. (1978) ‘Structure and Sense in Propertius III,’ Mnemosyne 31: 265–73.Google Scholar
McKeown, J. C. (1998) Ovid: Amores III: A Commentary on Book Two. Leeds.Google Scholar
Meban, D. (2008) ‘Temple Building, Primus Language, and the Proem to Virgil’s Third Georgic,’ CP 103/2: 150–74.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. (1983a) ‘Propertius 3.2 and Horace,’ TAPhS 113: 289–99.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. (1983b) ‘Ennius and the Elegists,’ ICS 8: 277–95.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. (1991) ‘Propertius’ Hymn to Bacchus and Contemporary Poetry,’ AJPh 11: 77–86.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. (2009) Apollo, Augustus, and the Poets. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. (2001) ‘Why Propertius Is a Woman: French Feminism and Augustan Elegy,’ CP 96: 127–46.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. (2004) Subjecting Verses: Latin Love Elegy and the Emergence of the Real. Princeton.Google Scholar
Moritz, L. A. (1968) ‘Some “Central” Thoughts on Horace’s Odes,’ CQ 18: 116–31.Google Scholar
Murgia, C. E. (2000) ‘The Division of Propertius 2,’ MD 44: 147–242.Google Scholar
Myerowitz, M. (1985) Ovid’s Games of Love. Detroit.Google Scholar
Mynors, R. A. B. (1990) Virgil, Georgics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nappa, C. (2005) Reading after Actium: Vergil’s Georgics, Octavian, and Rome. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Nethercut, W. R. (1968) ‘Notes on the Structure of Propertius, Book IV,’ AJPh 89: 449–64.Google Scholar
Nethercut, W. R. (1970a) ‘The Ironic Priest. Propertius’ ‘Roman Elegies’, III, 1–5: Imitations of Horace and Vergil,’ AJPh 91: 382–407.Google Scholar
Nethercut, W. R. (1970b) ‘Propertius 3.12–14,’ CP 65: 99–102.Google Scholar
Nethercut, W. R. (1971) ‘Propertius 3.11,’ TAPhS 102: 411–43.Google Scholar
Nethercut, W. R. (1975) ‘Propertius III I, 1–6 again,’ Mnemosyne 28: 73–5.Google Scholar
Neumeister, K. (1983) Die Überwindung der elegischen Liebe bei Properz (Buch I–III). Studien zur klassischen Philologie 7. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Newman, J. K. (1985) ‘Pindar and Callimachus,’ ICS 10: 169–89.Google Scholar
Newman, J. K. (1997) Augustan Propertius: Recapitulation of a Genre. Zürich.Google Scholar
Newman, J. K. (2006) ‘The Third Book: Defining a Poetic Self,’ in Günther, H.-C. (ed.) Brill’s Companion to Propertius, 319–52. Leiden.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. & Hubbard, M. (1970) A Commentary on Horace, Odes, Book I. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. & Hubbard, M. (1978) A Commentary on Horace, Odes, Book II. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. & Rudd, N. (2004) A Commentary on Horace, Odes, Book III. Oxford.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. (1997) ‘The Erotics of Amicitia: Readings in Tibullus, Propertius and Horace,’ in Hallett, J. P. & Skinner, M. B. (eds) Roman Sexualities, 151–71. Princeton.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. (1998) Horace and the Rhetoric of Authority. Cambridge.Google Scholar
O’Neill, K. N. (2000) ‘Propertius 4.2: Slumming with Vertumnus?,’ AJPh 121: 259–77.Google Scholar
O’Neill, K. N. (2005) ‘The Lover’s Gaze and Cynthia’s Glance,’ in Ancona, R. & Greene, E. (eds) Gendered Dynamics in Latin Love Poetry, 243–68. Baltimore.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, D. (2011) ‘The Representation and Misrepresentation of Virgilian Poetry in Propertius 2.34,’ AJPh 132: 457–97.Google Scholar
Otis, B. (1963) Virgil: A Study in Civilized Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar
Otis, B. (1965) ‘Propertius’ Single Book,’ HSPh 70: 1–44.Google Scholar
Owens, W. M. (1992) ‘Nuntius Vafer et Fallax: An Alternative Reading of Horace, C 3.7,’ CW 85: 161–71.Google Scholar
Pasquali, G. (1920) Orazio lirico. Florence.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. (2002) ‘Duplices Tabellae: A Reading – and Rereading – of Propertius 3.23,’ SIFC 20: 171–81.Google Scholar
Perkins, C. (2002) ‘Protest and Paradox in Ovid, Amores 3.11,’ CW 94: 117–25.Google Scholar
Phillips, T. (2011) ‘Propertius and the Poetics of the Book’: 1.18 and 3.15–17,’ CCJ 57: 105–35.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (1973) ‘Horace c3.30: The Lyricist as Hero,’ Ramus 2: 1–17.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (1977) ‘Propertius 22: Tullus’ Return,’ ICS 2: 240–54.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (1980) ‘Propertius’ Third Book: Patterns of Cohesion,’ Arethusa 13: 97–113.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (1998) Virgil’s Epic Designs: Ekphrasis in the Aeneid. New Haven.Google Scholar
Racette-Campbell, M. (2013) ‘Marriage Contracts, Fides and Gender Roles in Propertius 3.20,’ CJ 108: 297–317.Google Scholar
Reed, J. (2001) ‘Anchises Reading Aeneas Reading Marcellus,’ SyllClass 12: 146–68.Google Scholar
Reitzenstein, E. (1931) ‘Zur Stiltheorie des Kallimachos,’ Festschrift Richard Reitzenstein: 49–51.Google Scholar
Richardson, L. (1977) Propertius, Elegies I–IV. Norman.Google Scholar
Rosati, G. (2006) ‘The Art of the Remedia Amoris: Unlearning to Love?,’ in Gibson, R. K, Green, S. & Sharrock, A. R. (eds) The Art of Love: Bimillennial Essays on Ovid’s Ars Amatoria and Remedia Amoris, 143–65. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ross, D. O. (1975) Backgrounds to Augustan Poetry: Gallus, Elegy, and Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rudd, N. (ed.) (1993) Horace 2000: A Celebration. Essays for the Bimillenium. London.Google Scholar
Rutherford, R. (2007) ‘Poetics and Literary Criticism,’ in Harrison, S. J. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Horace, 248–61. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Santirocco, M. S. (1980a) ‘Horace’s Odes and the Ancient Poetry Book,’ Arethusa 13: 43–57.Google Scholar
Santirocco, M. S. (1980b) ‘Strategy and Structure in Horace C. 2.12,’ in Deroux, C. (ed.) Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 2, Collection Latomus 168, 223–36. Brussels.Google Scholar
Santirocco, M. S. (1984) ‘The Maecenas Odes,’ TAPhA 114: 241–53.Google Scholar
Santirocco, M. S. (1986) Unity and Design in Horace’s Odes. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Santirocco, M. S. (1995) ‘Horace and Augustan Ideology,’ Arethusa 28: 225–43.Google Scholar
Schauer, M. (2007) Aeneas Dux: Eine literarische Fiktion in augusteischer Zeit. Munich.Google Scholar
Schmidt, P. L. (1984) ‘Structure and Sources of Horace, Ode 2,12,’ in Evjen, H. (ed.) Mnemai: Classical Studies in Memory of Karl K. Hulley, 139–49. Chico.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1956) Propertiana. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. R. (1994) Seduction and Repetition in Ovid’s Ars Amatoria 2. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. R. (1995) ‘The Drooping Rose: Elegiac Failure in Amores 3.7,’ Ramus 24: 152–80.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. R. (1996) ‘The Art of Deceit: Pseudolus and the Nature of Reading,’ CQ 46/1: 152–74.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. R. (2000) ‘Constructing Characters in Propertius,’ Arethusa 33: 263–84.Google Scholar
Skard, E. (1965) ‘Die Heldenschau in Vergils Aeneis,’ Symbolae Osloenses 40: 53–65.Google Scholar
Stahl, H.-P. (1985) Propertius: ‘Love’ and ‘War’: Individual and State under Augustus. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Sullivan, J. P. (1976) Propertius: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1978) History in Ovid. Oxford.Google Scholar
Syndikus, H. P. (1972–3) Die Lyrik des Horaz. 2 vols. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Syndikus, H. P. (2006) ‘The Second Book,’ in Günther, H.-C. (ed.) Brill’s Companion to Propertius, 245–318. Leiden.Google Scholar
Tatum, J. W. (2000) ‘Aspirations and Divagations: The Poetics of Place in Propertius 2.10,’ TAPhA 130: 393–410.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. (2016) Texts, Editors, and Readers: Methods and Problems in Latin Textual Criticism. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1983) ‘Callimachus, the Victoria Berenices, and Roman Poetry,’ CQ 33: 92–113.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1988) Virgil, Georgics. 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1998) ‘Virgil’s Pindar?,’ in Knox, P. E. & Foss, C. (eds) Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen, 99–120. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1999) Reading Virgil and His Texts: Studies in Intertextuality. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (2001) Virgil and the Augustan Reception. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tissol, G. (2005) ‘Maimed Books and Maimed Authors,’ in Batstone, W. W. & Tissol, G. (eds) Defining Genre and Gender in Latin Literature: Essays Presented to William S. Anderson on His Seventy-Fifth Birthday, 97–112. New York.Google Scholar
Tränkle, H. (1960) Die Sprachkunst des Properz und die Tradition der lateinischen Dichtersprache. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. (2005) ‘Women in the Time of Augustus,’ in Galinsky, K. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus, 130–47. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tronson, A. (1998) ‘Vergil, the Augustans, and the Invention of Cleopatra’s Suicide: One Asp or Two?,’ Vergilius 44: 31–50.Google Scholar
Tronson, A. (1999) ‘What the Poet Saw: Octavian’s Triple Triumph, 29 B.C. Jeremiah Markland’s Conjectures at Propertius 3.11.52–53,’ AClass 42: 171–86.Google Scholar
Troxler-Keller, I. (1964) Die Dichterlandschaft des Horaz. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Valeri-Tomaszuk, P. (1976) ‘A Reconsideration of Propertius, III 10,’ Latomus 35: 827–33.Google Scholar
Valladares, H. (2005) ‘The Lover as a Model Viewer,’ in Ancona, R. & Greene, E. (eds) Gendered Dynamics in Latin Love Poetry, 206–42. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. (1988) Roman Erotic Elegy: Love, Poetry, and the West. Chicago.Google Scholar
Warden, J. (1980) Fallax Opus: Poet and Reader in the Elegies of Propertius. Toronto.Google Scholar
Weinlich, B. P. (2003) ‘Re-Constructing Relationships: The Significance of Name and Place in Propertius 3.22,’ Ramus 32: 102–21.Google Scholar
Weinlich, B. P. (2005) ‘Properz III, 11: Eine Neubetrachtung im Kontext des “Liebesromans”,’ GB 24: 135–50.Google Scholar
Welch, T. S. (2005) The Elegiac Cityscape: Propertius and the Meaning of Roman Monuments. Columbus.Google Scholar
Welch, T. S. (2012) ‘Whose Reading of What Propertius’?, in Greene, E. & Welch, T. S. (eds) Propertius, 1–27. Oxford.Google Scholar
West, D. (2002) Horace Odes III: Dulce Periculum. Oxford.Google Scholar
White, P. (1995) ‘Postumus, Curtius Postumus, and Rabirius Postumus,’ CP 90: 151–61.Google Scholar
White, P. (2007) ‘Friendship, Patronage, and Horatian Sociopoetics,’ in Harrison, S. J. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Horace, 195–206. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wiggers, N. (1977) ‘Reconsideration of Propertius II. 1,’ CJ 72: 334–41.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. P. (1966) ‘The Continuity of Propertius II.13,’ CR 16: 141–4.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. P. (1969) The Georgics of Virgil: A Critical Survey. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. P. (1970) ‘Pindar and the Proem to the Third Georgic,’ in W. Wimmel (ed.) Forschungen zur römischen Literatur: Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Karl Büchner, 286–90. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Williams, G. (1968) Tradition and Originality in Roman Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar
Williams, G. (1974) ‘Horace Odes i.12 and the Succession to Augustus,’ Hermathena 118: 147–55.Google Scholar
Williams, M. F. (1996) ‘Poetic Seacoasts: Mortale’s i Morti and Propertius 3.18, 1.11, 3.5,’ Classical and Modern Literature 17: 149–69.Google Scholar
Williams, R. D. (1964) ‘The Sixth Book of the “Aeneid”,’ G&R 11: 48–63.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. (2009) ‘The Politics of Elegy: Propertius and Tibullus,’ in Dominik, W. S., Garthwaite, J. & Roche, P. A. (eds) Writing Politics in Imperial Rome, 173–202. Leiden.Google Scholar
Wimmel, W. (1960) Kallimachos in Rom: Die Nachfolge seines apologetischen Dichtens in der Augusteerzeit. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Woolley, A. (1967) ‘The Structure of Propertius Book iii,’ BICS 14: 80–3.Google Scholar
Wyke, M. (1987a) ‘The Elegiac Woman at Rome,’ PCPhS 33: 153–78.Google Scholar
Wyke, M. (1987b) ‘Written Women: Propertius’ scripta puella,’ JRS 77: 47–61.Google Scholar
Wyke, M. (1989a) ‘Mistress and Metaphor in Augustan Elegy,’ Helios 16: 25–47.Google Scholar
Wyke, M. (1989b) ‘Reading Female Flesh: Amores 3.1,’ in Cameron, A. (ed.) History as Text: The Writing of Ancient History, 111–43. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Wyke, M. (1994) ‘Taking the Woman’s Part: Engendering Roman Love Elegy,’ Ramus 23: 110–28.Google Scholar
Wyke, M. (2002) The Roman Mistress. Oxford.Google Scholar
Yardley, J. C. (1972) ‘Comic Influences in Propertius,’ Phoenix 26: 134–9.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (1988) The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1982) ‘The Poetics of Patronage in Late First Century B.C.,’ in Gold, B. K. (ed.) Literary and Artistic Patronage in Ancient Rome, 87–102. Austin.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1989) ‘Romane Memento: Justice and Judgment in Aeneid 6,’ TAPhA 119: 263–84.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Jonathan Wallis, University of Tasmania
  • Book: Introspection and Engagement in Propertius
  • Online publication: 14 April 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108265003.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Jonathan Wallis, University of Tasmania
  • Book: Introspection and Engagement in Propertius
  • Online publication: 14 April 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108265003.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Jonathan Wallis, University of Tasmania
  • Book: Introspection and Engagement in Propertius
  • Online publication: 14 April 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108265003.012
Available formats
×