Aaron, Jessi Elana. (2015). Lone English-origin nouns in Spanish: The precedence of community norms. International Journal of Bilingualism 19(4):459–480.Google Scholar

Aijón Oliva, Miguel Angel, and Serrano, María José. (2010). El hablante en su discurso: Expresión y omisión del sujeto de creo. Oralia 13:7–38.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (2002). Language contact in Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Akmajian, Adrian, and Heny, Frank. (1980). An introduction to the principles of transformational syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Alfaraz, Gabriela. (2015). Variation of overt and null-subject pronouns in the Spanish of Santo Domingo. In: Carvalho, A. M., Orozco, R., and Shin, N. L. (eds.), Subject pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal perspective. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press. 3–16.Google Scholar

Altarriba, Jeanette, Kroll, Judith F., Sholl, Alexandra, and Rayner, Keith. (1996). The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: Evidence from eye fixations and naming time. Memory & Cognition 24(4):477–492.Google Scholar

Amaral, Patricia Matos, and Schwenter, Scott A. (2005). Contrast and the (non-) occurrence of subject pronouns. In: Eddington, D. (ed.), Selected proceedings of the 7th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville: Cascadilla Press. 116–127.Google Scholar

Ariel, Mira. (1994). Interpreting anaphoric expressions: A cognitive versus a pragmatic approach. Journal of Linguistics 30(1):3–42.Google Scholar

Auer, Peter. (1995). The pragmatics of code-switching: A sequential approach. In: Milroy, L. and Muysken, P. (eds.), One speaker, two languages: Cross disciplinary perspectives on code switching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 115–135.Google Scholar

Ávila Jiménez, Barbara I. (1995). A sociolinguistic analysis of a change in progress: Pronominal overtness in Puerto Rican Spanish. Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 13:25–47.Google Scholar

Backus, Ad. (2005). Codeswitching and language change: One thing leads to another? International Journal of Bilingualism 9(3–4):307–340.Google Scholar

Bailey, Guy, and Tillery, Jan. (2004). Some sources of divergent data in sociolinguistics. In: Fought, C. (ed.), Sociolinguistic variation: Critical reflections. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 11–30.Google Scholar

Balukas, Colleen, and Koops, Christian. (2015). Spanish-English bilingual VOT in spontaneous code-switching. International Journal of Bilingualism 19(4):423–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin, Bolker, Ben, and Walker, Steve. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1):1–48, DOI:10.18637/jss.v18067.i18601.Google Scholar

Bayley, Robert, Cárdenas, Norma L., Treviño Schouten, Belinda, and Vélez Salas, Carlos Martin. (2012). Spanish dialect contact in San Antonio, Texas: An exploratory study. In: Geeslin, K. and Díaz-Campos, M. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 14th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. 48–60.Google Scholar

Bayley, Robert, Greer, Kristen, and Holland, Cory. (2013). Lexical frequency and syntactic variation: A test of a linguistic hypothesis. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 19(2):21–30.Google Scholar

Bayley, Robert, and Pease-Alvarez, Lucinda. (1997). Null pronoun variation in Mexican-descent children’s narrative discourse. Language Variation and Change 9(3):349–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benevento, Nicole, and Dietrich, Amelia. (2015). I think, therefore digo yo: Variable position of the 1sg subject pronoun in New Mexican Spanish-English code-switching. International Journal of Bilingualism 19(4):407–422.Google Scholar

Bentivoglio, Paola. (1987). Los sujetos pronominales de primera persona en el habla de Caracas. Caracas: Universidad Central de Venezuela.Google Scholar

Bhatt, Akesh M., and Bolonyai, Agnes. (2011). Code-switching and the optimal grammar of bilingual language use. International Journal of Bilingualism 14(4):522–546.Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Finegan, Edward, and Conrad, Susan. (1999). The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Bills, Garland D., Hernández Chávez, Eduardo, and Hudson, Alan. (1995). The geography of language shift: Distance from the Mexican border and Spanish language claiming in the Southwestern US. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 114: 9–27.Google Scholar

Bills, Garland D., and Vigil, Neddy A. (1999a). Ashes to ashes: The historical basis for dialect variation in New Mexican Spanish. Romance Philology 53(1):43–66.Google Scholar

Bills, Garland D., and Vigil, Neddy A. (1999b). El cambio lingüístico en el español nuevomexicano: los factores de edad y educación. In: Samper Padilla, J. A. and Troya Déniz, M. (eds.), Actas del XI Congreso Internacional de la Asociación de Lingüística y Filología de la América Latina. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. 877–885.Google Scholar

Bills, Garland D., and Vigil, Neddy A. (2008). The Spanish language of New Mexico and southern Colorado: A linguistic atlas. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar

Bock, J. Kathryn, and Griffin, Zenzi M. (2000). The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129(2):177–192.Google Scholar

Bock, J. Kathryn, and Warren, Richard K. (1985). Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation. Cognition 21:47–67.Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight. (1976). Meaning and memory. Forum Linguisticum 1(1):1–14.Google Scholar

Bowern, Claire. (2010). Fieldwork and the IRB: A snapshot. Language 86(4):897–904.Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan, Dingare, Shipra, and Manning, Christopher D. (2001). Soft constraints mirror hard constraints: Voice and person in English and Lummi. In: Butt, M. and Hollaway, T. (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG01 Conference. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 13–31.Google Scholar

Brown, Esther L. (2005a). New Mexican Spanish: Insight into the variable reduction of “la ehe inihial” (/s-/). Hispania 88(4):813–824.Google Scholar

Brown, Esther L. (2005b). Syllable-initial /s/ in Traditional New Mexican Spanish: Linguistic factors favoring reduction ahina. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 24(1–2):13–30.Google Scholar

Brown, Esther L. (2015). The role of discourse context frequency in phonological variation: A usage-based approach to bilingual speech production. International Journal of Bilingualism 19(4):387–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Esther L., and Raymond, William D. (2012). How discourse context shapes the lexicon: Explaining the distribution of Spanish f- / h- words. Diachronica 92(2):139–161.Google Scholar

Brown, Esther L., and Torres Cacoullos, Rena. (2002). Qué le vamoh aher?: Taking the syllable out of Spanish /s/-reduction. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics (PWPL), Papers from NWAV 30 8(3):17–31.Google Scholar

Bullock, Barbara E., and Toribio, Almeida Jacqueline. (2004). Introduction: Convergence as an emergent property in bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(2):91–94.Google Scholar

Butt, John, and Benjamin, Carmen. (2004). A new reference grammar of modern Spanish, 4th edn. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. (1985). Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. (2002). Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14(3):261–290.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. (2009). Language universals and usage-based theory. In: Christiansen, M. H., Collins, C., and Edelman, S. (eds.), Language universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 17–39.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, Joan. (2015). Language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere, and Pagliuca, William. (1994). The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan, and Torres Cacoullos, Rena. (2009). The role of prefabs in grammaticization: How the particular and the general interact in language change. In: Corrigan, R. L., Moravcsik, E., Ouali, H., and Wheatley, K. (eds.), Formulaic language, Vol. 1: Distribution and historical change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 187–217.Google Scholar

Cameron, Richard. (1992). Pronominal and null subject variation in Spanish: Constraints, dialects, and functional compensation. Doctoral dissertation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Cameron, Richard. (1993). Ambiguous agreement, functional compensation, and nonspecific tú in the Spanish of San Juan, Puerto Rico, and Madrid, Spain. Language Variation and Change 5(3):305–334.Google Scholar

Cameron, Richard. (1994). Switch reference, verb class and priming in a variable syntax. Papers from the Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: Parasession on variation in linguistic theory 30(2):27–45.Google Scholar

Cameron, Richard. (1995). The scope and limits of switch reference as a constraint on pronominal subject expression. Hispanic Linguistics 6–7:1–27.Google Scholar

Cameron, Richard, and Flores-Ferrán, Nydia. (2004). Perseveration of subject expression across regional dialects of Spanish. Spanish in Context 1(1):41–65.Google Scholar

Cárdenas, Daniel N. (1975). Mexican Spanish. In: Hernández Chávez, E., Cohen, A., and Beltramo, A. F. (eds.), El lenguaje de los chicanos. Arlington: Center for Applied Linguistics. 1–5.Google Scholar

Carvalho, Ana M., and Child, Michael. (2011). Subject pronoun expression in a variety of Spanish in contact with Portuguese. In: Michnowicz, J. and Dodsworth, R. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. 14–25.Google Scholar

Carvalho, Ana M., Orozco, Rafael, and Shin, Naomi Lapidus. (2015). Introduction. In: Carvalho, A. M., Orozco, R., and Shin, N. L. (eds.), Subject pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal perspective. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press. xiii–xxvi.Google Scholar

Cedergren, Henrietta. (1973). On the nature of variable constraints. In: Bailey, C.-J. N. and Shuy, R. W. (eds.), New ways of analyzing variation in English. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press. 13–22.Google Scholar

Cedergren, Henrietta, and Sankoff, David. (1974). Variable rules: Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language 50:333–355.Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace. (1988). Linking intonation units in Spoken English. In: Haiman, J. and Thompson, S. A. (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 1–27.Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace. (1994). Discourse, consciousness and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Chociej, Joanna. (2011). Polish null subjects: English influence on heritage Polish in Toronto. Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto. Ms.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. (1981 [1993]). Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa lectures, 7th edn. Holland: Foris Publications.Google Scholar

Christiansen, Morten H., and Chater, Nick. (2016). The Now-or-Never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39: e62; DOI:10.1017/S0140525X1500031X.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Claes, Jeroen. (2011). ¿Constituyen las Antillas y el Caribe continental una sola zona dialectal? Datos de la variable expresión del sujeto pronominal en San Juan de Puerto Rico y Barranquilla, Colombia. Spanish in Context 8(2):191–212.Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clyne, Michael. (1991). Community languages: The Australian experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Comajoan, Llorenc. (2006). Continuity and episodic structure in Spanish subject reference. In: Clements, J. C. and Yoon, J. (eds.), Functional approaches to Spanish syntax: Lexical semantics, discourse and transitivity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 53–79.Google Scholar

Company Company, Concepción. (1995). Old forms for new concepts: The recategorization of possessive duplications in Mexican Spanish. In: Andersen, H. (ed.), Historical Linguistics 1993: Selected papers from the 11th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Los Angeles, 16–20 August 1993. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 77–92.Google Scholar

Company Company, Concepción. (2006). Subjectification of verbs into discourse markers: Semantic-pragmatic change only? In: Cornillie, B. and Delbecque, N. (eds.), Topics in subjectification and modalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 97–121.Google Scholar

Comrie, Benrard. (1976). Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Corrigan, Roberta L., Moravcsik, Edith A., Ouali, Hamid, and Wheatley, Kathleen. (2009). Formulaic language. vol. I: Distribution and historical change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Ono, Tsuyoshi. (2007). “Incrementing” in conversation: A comparison of practices in English, German and Japanese Pragmatics 17(4):513–552.Google Scholar

Croft, William. (1995). Intonation units and grammatical structure. Linguistics 33:839–882.Google Scholar

Croft, William. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Croft, William. (2007). Intonation units and grammatical structure in Wardaman and in cross-linguistic perspective. Australian Journal of Linguistics 27(1):1–39.Google Scholar

Cruttenden, Alan. (1986). Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Crystal, David. (1979). Neglected grammatical factors in conversational English. In: Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., and Svartvik, J. (eds.), Studies in English linguistics. London: Longman. 153–166.Google Scholar

D’Introno, Francesco, and Sosa, Juan M. (1986). La elisión de la /d/ en el español de Caracas: Aspectos sociolingüísticos e implicaciones teóricas. In: Cedeño, R. N., Páez Urdaneta, I., and Guitart, J. M. (eds.), Estudios sobre la fonología del español del Caribe. Caracas: La Casa de Bello. 135–163.Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, Eva. (2012). Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 2(3):219–253.Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen. (2000). Egophoricity in discourse and syntax. Functions of Language 7(1):37–77.Google Scholar

Davidson, Brad. (1996). “Pragmatic weight” and Spanish subject pronouns: The pragmatic and discourse uses of tú and yo in spoken Madrid Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 26(4):543–565.Google Scholar

Delancey, Scott. (1981). An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language 57(3):626–657.Google Scholar

Doğruöz, A. Seza, and Backus, Ad. (2007). Postverbal elements in immigrant Turkish: Evidence of change? International Journal of Bilingualism 11(2):185–220.Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. (2013). Expression of pronominal subjects. In: Dryer, M. S. and Haspelmath, M. (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/101.Google Scholar

Du Bois, John W. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63(4):805–855.Google Scholar

Du Bois, John W., Chafe, Wallace L., Myer, Charles, Thompson, Sandra A., Englebretson, Robert, and Martey, Nii. (2000–2005). Santa Barbara corpus of spoken American English, Parts 1–4. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar

Du Bois, John W., Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan, Cumming, Susanna, and Paolino, Danae. (1993). Outline of discourse transcription. In: Edwards, J. and Lampert, M. (eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 45–89.Google Scholar

Dumont, Jenny. (2010). Testing the cognitive load hypothesis: Repair rates and usage in a bilingual community. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 3(2):329–352.Google Scholar

Dumont, Jenny. (2016). Third person references: Forms and functions in two spoken genres of Spanish. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

England, Nora C. (1992). Doing Mayan linguistics in Guatemala. Language 68(1):29–35.Google Scholar

Englebretson, Robert, and Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. (2014). Discourse participants in interaction: Cross-linguistic perspectives on subject expression and ellipsis. Journal of Pragmatics 63:1–4.Google Scholar

Enríquez, Emilia V. (1984). El pronombre personal sujeto en la lengua española hablada en Madrid. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Instituto Miguel de Cervantes.Google Scholar

Epps, Patience. (2012). On form and function in language contact: A case study from the Amazonian Vaupés region. In: Chamoreau, C. and Léglise, I. (eds.), Dynamics of contact-induced language change. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. 195–230.Google Scholar

Erker, Daniel, and Guy, Gregory R. (2012). The role of lexical frequency in syntactic variability: Variation subject personal pronoun expression in Spanish. Language 88(3):526–557.Google Scholar

Erker, Daniel, and Otheguy, Ricardo. (2016). Contact and coherence: Dialectal leveling and structural convergence in NYC Spanish. Lingua 172–173:131–146.Google Scholar

Erman, Britt, and Warren, Beatrice. (2000). The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text 20:29–62.Google Scholar

Espinosa, Auerlio M. (1911). The Spanish language in New Mexico and Southern Colorado. Santa Fe Historical Society of New Mexico 16.Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas. 2014. The Wellsprings of Linguistic Diversity, www.dynamicsoflanguage.edu.au/the-wellsprings-of-linguistic-diversity/ Australian Research Council funded Laureate Project, 2014–2019, Australian National UniversityGoogle Scholar

Ewing, Michael C. (2014). Motivations for first and second person subject expression and ellipsis in Javanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 63:48–62.Google Scholar

Fernández-Gibert, Arturo. (2010). From voice to print: Language and social change in New Mexico, 1880–1912. In: Rivera-Mills, S. and Villa, D. J. (eds.), Spanish of the US Southwest: A language in transition. Madrid: Iberoamericana. 45–62.Google Scholar

Fernández-Soriano, Olga. (1999). El pronombre personal. Formas y distribuciones. Pronombres átonos y tónicos. In: Demonte, V. and Bosque, I. (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe. 1209–1273.Google Scholar

Ferreira, Victor S. (2008). Ambiguity, accessibility, and a division of labor for communicative success. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 49:209–226.Google Scholar

Fleischman, Suzanne. (1991). Discourse pragmatics and the grammar of Old French: A functional reinterpretation of si and the personal pronouns. Romance Philology 44(3):251–283.Google Scholar

Flores-Ferrán, Nydia. (2002). Subject personal pronouns in Spanish narratives of Puerto Ricans in New York City: A sociolinguistic perspective. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

Flores-Ferrán, Nydia. (2010). ¡Tú no me hables! Pronoun expression in conflict narratives. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 203:61–82.Google Scholar

Ford, Cecilia E., and Fox, Barbara A. (1996). Interactional motivations for reference formulation: He had. This guy had, a beautiful, thirty-two olds. In: Fox, B. A. (ed.), Studies in anaphora. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 145–168.Google Scholar

Ford, Cecilia E., Fox, Barbara A., and Thompson, Sandra A. (2002). Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In: Ford, C. E., Fox, B. A., and Thompson, S. A. (eds.), The language of turn and sequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 14–38.Google Scholar

Ford, Cecilia E., and Thompson, Sandra A. (1996). Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In: Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., and Thompson, S. A. (eds.), Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 134–184.Google Scholar

Fox, Barbara A. (1987). Anaphora in popular written English narratives. In: Tomlin, R. S. (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 157–174.Google Scholar

Fricke, Melinda, Kroll, Judith F., and Dussias, Paola E. (2016). Phonetic variation in bilingual speech: A lens for studying the production–comprehension link. Journal of Memory and Language 89:110–137.Google Scholar

Gara, Tom, and Hercus, Luise. (2005). Oral history: Dr Luise Hercus’ work in the Lake Eyre Basin, 1965–2005: Report to the Native Title Section, Crown Solicitor’s Office.Google Scholar

García, Mary Ellen, and Tallon, Michael. (2000). Estar in Mexican-American Spanish: Phonological or morphological variability? In: Roca, A. (ed.), Research on Spanish in the United States: Linguistic issues and challenges. Somerville: Cascadilla Press. 348–359.Google Scholar

García-Acevedo, María Rosa. (2000). The forgotten diaspora: Mexican immigration to New Mexico. In: Gonzales-Berry, E. and Maciel, D. R. (eds.), The contested homeland: A Chicano history of New Mexico. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press. 215–238.Google Scholar

Gili y Gaya, Samuel. (1964). Curso superior de sintaxis española, 9th edn. Barcelona: Bibliograf.Google Scholar

Givón, T. (1979). On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Givón, T. (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In: Givón, T. (ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-linguistic study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1–41.Google Scholar

Givón, T. (1990). Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Givón, T. (2001). Syntax: An introduction. vol. 2, 2 vols, 2nd edn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Gonzales, María Dolores. (1999). Crossing social and cultural borders: The road to language hybridity. In: Galindo, L. and Gonzales, M. D. (eds.), Speaking Chicana: Voice, power and identity. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. 13–38.Google Scholar

Gonzales-Berry, Erlinda. (2000). Which language will our children speak? The Spanish language and public education policy in New Mexico, 1890–1930. In: Gonzales-Berry, E. and Maciel, D. R. (eds.), The contested homeland: A Chicano history of New Mexico. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press. 169–189.Google Scholar

Gonzales-Berry, Erlinda, and Maciel, David R. (eds.). (2000). The contested homeland: A Chicano history of New Mexico. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. (1980). Restarts, pauses, and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn-beginning. Sociological Inquiry 50(3–4):272–302.Google Scholar

Granda, German de. (1972). Transculturación e interferencia linguistica en el Puerto Rico contemporáneo (1898–1968). Río Piedras, Puerto Rico: Editorial Edil.Google Scholar

Green, David W., and Wei, Li. (2014). A control process model of code-switching. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 29:499–511.Google Scholar

Greenough, J.B., Kittredge, G.L., Howard, A.A., and D’ooge, Benj. L. (1903). Allen and Greenough’s new Latin grammar for schools and colleges. Boston and London: Ginn & Company Publishers.Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. (2005). Syntactic priming: A corpus-based approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34(4):365–399.Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th., and Kootstra, Gerrit Jan. (2017). Structural priming within and across languages: A corpus-based perspective. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20(2):235–250.Google Scholar

Grosjean, François. (1998). Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1(2):131–149.Google Scholar

Grosjean, François. (2001). The bilingual’s language modes. In: Nicol, J. L. (ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers. 1–22.Google Scholar

Grosjean, François. (2015). The complementarity principle and its impact on processing, acquisition, and dominance. In: Silva-Corvalán, C. and Treffers-Daller, J. (eds.), Language dominance in bilinguals: Issues of measurement and operationalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 36–65.Google Scholar

Gudmestad, Aarnes, House, Leanna, and Geeslin, Kimberly. (2013). What a Bayesian analysis can do for SLA: New tools for the sociolinguistic study of subject expression in L2 Spanish. Language Learning 63(3):371–399.Google Scholar

Gullberg, Marianne, Indefrey, Peter, and Muysken, Pieter. (2009). Research techniques for the study of code-switching. In: Bullock, B. E. and Toribio, A. J. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook on linguistic code-switching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 21–39.Google Scholar

Gumperz, John J. (1976/1982). Conversational code-switching. In: Gumperz, J. J. (ed.), Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 59–99.Google Scholar

Gumperz, John J., and Wilson, Robert. (1971). Convergence and creolization: A case from the Indo-Aryan/Dravidian border in India. In: Hymes, D. (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 151–167.Google Scholar

Guy, Gregory R. (1980). Variation in the group and the individual: The case of final stop deletion. In: Labov, W. (ed.), Language in time and space. New York: Academic Press. 1–36.Google Scholar

Guzzardo Tamargo, Rosa. (2012). Linking comprehension costs to production patterns during the processing of mixed language. Doctoral dissertation, Penn State University.Google Scholar

Guzzardo Tamargo, Rosa, Valdés Kroff, Jorge, and Dussias, Paola E. (2016). Examining the relationship between comprehension and production processes in code-switched language. Journal of Memory and Language 89: 138–161.Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane. (1994). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory, 2nd edn. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane. (2013). The syntax of registers: Diary subject omission and the privilege of the root. Lingua 130:88–110.Google Scholar

Haeri, Niloofar. (1989). Overt and non-overt subjects in Persian, IPrA Papers in Pragmatics 3(1):155–166. DOI: 10.1075/iprapip.3.1.05hae.Google Scholar

Haiman, John, and Munro, Pamela. (1983). Introduction. Switch reference and universal grammar: Proceedings of a symposium on switch reference and universal grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K., and Greaves, William S. (2008). Intonation in the grammar of English. London: Equinox Publishers.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K., and Hasan, Ruqaiya. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Harrell, Frank E. Jr, with contributions from Charles Dupont and many others. (2015), Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous. R package version 3.17–0. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Hmisc/index.html.Google Scholar

Harris, Martin. (1978). The evolution of French syntax: A comparative approach. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Hartsuiker, Robert J., Pickering, Martin J., and Veltkamp, Eline. (2004). Is syntax separate or shared between languages. Psychological Science 15(6):409–414.Google Scholar

Harvie, Dawn. (1998). Null subject in English: Wonder if it exists? Cahiers Linguistiques d’ Ottawa 16:15–25.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. (2004). Coordinating constructions: An overview. Typological Studies in Language 58:3–40.Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer, and Foulkes, Paul. (2016). The evolution of medial /t/ over real and remembered time. Language 92(2):298–330.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd, and Kuteva, Tania. (2005). Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd, and Kuteva, Tania. (2011). The areal dimension of grammaticalization. In: Heine, B. and Narrog, H. (eds.), Handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 291–301.Google Scholar

Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. (2014). Searching for motivations for grammatical patternings. Pragmatics 24(3):453–476.Google Scholar

Hernández, José Esteban. (2009). Measuring rates of word-final nasal velarization: The effect of dialect contact on in-group and out-group exchanges. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13(5):583–612.Google Scholar

Hernández, José Esteban. (2011). Measuring rates and constraints of word-final nasal velarization in dialect contact. In: Ortíz-López, L. A. (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 13th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. 54–69.Google Scholar

Hochberg, Judith G. (1986). Functional compensation for /s/ deletion in Puerto Rican Spanish. Language 62(3):609–621.Google Scholar

Hock, Hans Henrich, and Joseph, Brian D. (1996). Language history, language change, and language relationship. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Michol F., and Walker, James A. (2010). Ethnolects and the city: Ethnic orientation and linguistic variation in Toronto English. Language Variation and Change 22(1):37–67.Google Scholar

Holmquist, Jonathan. (2012). Frequency rates and constraints on subject personal pronoun expression: Findings from the Puerto Rican highlands. Language Variation and Change 24(2):203–220.Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. (1979). Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In: Givón, T. (ed.), Discourse and syntax. New York: Academic Press. 213–241.Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J., and Thompson, Sandra A. (2008). Projectability and clause combining in interaction. In: Laury, R. (ed.), Crosslinguistic studies of clause combining: The multifunctionality of conjunctions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 99–123.Google Scholar

Horvath, Barbara, and Sankoff, David. (1987). Delimiting the Sydney speech community. Language in Society 16(2):179–204.Google Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney, and Pullum, Geoffrey K. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Huerta, Ana. (1978). Code-switching among Spanish-English bilinguals: A sociolinguistic perspective. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar

Iwasaki, Shoichi, and Tao, Hongyin. (1993). A comparative study of the structure of the Intonation Unit in English, Japanese, and Mandarin Chinese. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Los Angeles, CA, January 9, 1993.Google Scholar

Izre’el, Shlomo (2005). Intonation Units and the Structure of Spontaneous Spoken Language: A View from Hebrew. In: Auran, C., Bertrand, R., Chanet, C., Colas, A., Di Cristo, A., Portes, C., Reynier, A., and Vion, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the IDP05 International Symposium on Discourse-Prosody Interfaces. CD ROM. Downloadable at: http://aune.lpl.univ-aix.fr/~prodige/idp05/actes/izreel.pdf.Google Scholar

Jaeger, T. Florian. (2010). Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density. Cognitive Psychology 61(1): 23–62.Google Scholar

Jaeger, T. Florian, and Snider, Neal. (2007). Implicit learning and syntactic persistence: Surprisal and cumulativity. In: Wolter, L. and Thorson, J. (eds.), University of Rochester Working Papers in the Language Sciences, vol. 3 (1): 26–44.Google Scholar

Jaffe, Alexandra, and Walton, Shana. (2000). The voices people read: Orthography and the representation of non-standard speech. Journal of Sociolinguistics 4(4):561–587.Google Scholar

Jia, Li, and Bayley, Robert. (2002). Null pronoun variation in Mandarin Chinese. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 8(3):103–116.Google Scholar

Kany, Charles E. (1951). American-Spanish syntax, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kato, Mary Aizawa. (1999). Strong and Weak Pronominals in the Null Subject Parameter. Probus 11:1–37.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul. (1982). Explanation in phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Kootstra, Gerrit Jan, Van Hell, Janet G., and Dijkstra, Ton. (2010). Syntactic alignment and shared word order in code-switched sentence production: Evidence from bilingual monologue and dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language 63:210–231.Google Scholar

Kroll, Judith F., Bobb, Susan C., and Wodniecka, Zofia. (2006). Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 9:119–135.Google Scholar

Kroll, Judith F., Dussias, Paola E., Bice, Kinsey, and Perrotti, Lauren. (2015). Bilingualism, mind, and brain. Annual Review of Linguistics 1:377–394.Google Scholar

Labov, William. (1969). Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45(4):715–762.Google Scholar

Labov, William. (1972a). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William. (1972b). Sociolinguistic patterns. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Labov, William. (1972c). Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society 1(1):97–120.Google Scholar

Labov, William. (1975). Empirical foundations of linguistic theory. In: Austerlitz, R. (ed.), The Scope of American Linguistics. Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press. 77–113.Google Scholar

Labov, William. (1982). Building on empirical foundations. In: Lehmann, W. P. and Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Perspectives on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 17–92.Google Scholar

Labov, William. (1984). Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In: Baugh, J. and Sherzer, J. (eds.), Language in use: Readings in sociolinguistics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. 28–53.Google Scholar

Labov, William. (1989). Exact description of the speech community: Short A in Philadelphia. In: Fasold, R. and Schiffrin, D. (eds.), Language change and variation. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 1–57.Google Scholar

Labov, William. (1994). Principles of linguistic change: Internal factors. vol. 1, 3 vols. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Labov, William. (1996). When intuitions fail. Papers from the Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 32(2):77–105.Google Scholar

Labov, William. (2001). Principles of linguistic change: Social factors. vol. 2, 3 vols. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Labov, William. (2004). Quantitative reasoning in linguistics. In: Ammon, U., Dittmar, N., Mattheier, K. J., and Trudgill, P. (eds.), Sociolinguistics/Soziolinguistik: An international handbook of the science of language and society, vol. 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 6–22.Google Scholar

Labov, William. (2007). Transmission and diffusion. Language 83(2):344–387.Google Scholar

Labov, William. (2010). Principles of linguistic change: Cognitive and cultural factors. vol. 3, 3 vols. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Labov, William. (2014). The role of African Americans in Philadelphia sound change. Language Variation and Change 26(1):1–19.Google Scholar

Labov, William, and Waletzky, Joshua. (1997 [1967]). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7(1/4):3–38.Google Scholar

Lamiroy, Béatrice, and De Mulder, Walter. (2011). Degrees of grammaticalization across languages. In: Narrog, H. and Heine, B. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 302–317.Google Scholar

Lastra, Yolanda, and Butragueño, Pedro Martín. (2015). Subject pronoun expression in oral Mexican Spanish. In: Carvalho, A. M., Orozco, R., and Shin, N. L. (eds.), Subject pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal perspective. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press. 39–57.Google Scholar

Lausberg, Hedda, and Sloetjes, Han. (2009). Coding gestural behavior with the NEUROGES-ELAN system. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers (Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, The Language Archive, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. http://tla.mpi.nl/tools/tla-tools/elan/). 41(3):841–849.Google Scholar

Lee, Duck-Young, and Yonezawa, Yoko. (2008). The role of the overt expression of first and second person subject in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 40(4):733–767.Google Scholar

Leroux, Martine, and Jarmasz, Lidia-Gabriela. (2005). A study about nothing: Null subjects as a diagnostic of the convergence between English and French. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 12(2):1–14.Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. (1987). Pragmatics and the grammar of anaphora: A partial pragmatic reduction of binding and control phenomena. Journal of Linguistics 23(2):379–434.Google Scholar

Li, Charles, and Thompson, Sandra A. (1979). Third-person pronouns and zero-anaphora in Chinese discourse. Syntax and Semantics 12:311–335.Google Scholar

Lipski, John M. (2008). Varieties of Spanish in the United States. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Loebell, Helga, and Bock, Kathryn. (2003). Structural priming across languages. Linguistics 41(5):791–824.Google Scholar

Lope Blanch, Juan M. (1987). El estudio del español hablado en el suroeste de los Estados Unidos. Anuario de Letras 25:201–208.Google Scholar

Lozano, Anthony G. (1977). El español chicano y la dialectología. Aztlán 7:13–18.Google Scholar

Luján, Marta. (1999). Expresión y omisión del pronombre personal. In: Bosque, I. and Demonte, V. (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol. 1. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe. 1275–1315.Google Scholar

Martín Butragueño, Pedro, and Lastra, Yolanda. (2011). Corpus sociolingüístico de la ciudad de México. vol. 1: nivel alto. México: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar

Matras, Yaron, and Sakel, Jeanette. (2007). Investigating the mechanisms of pattern replication in language convergence. Studies in Language 31(4):829–865.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Kazuko. (2003). Intonation units in Japanese conversation: Syntactic, information and functional structures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Mayol, Laia. (2010). Contrastive pronouns in null subject Romance languages. Lingua 120:2497–2514.Google Scholar

McKee, Rachel, Schembri, Adam, McKee, David, and Johnston, Trevor. (2011). Variable “subject” presence in Australian Sign Language and New Zealand Sign Language. Language Variation and Change 23(3):375–398.Google Scholar

Meyerhoff, Miriam. (2009). Replication, transfer, and calquing: Using variation as a tool in the study of language contact. Language Variation and Change 21(3):297–317.Google Scholar

Miller, Jim. (1995). Does spoken language have sentences? In: Palmer, F. R. (ed.), Grammar and meaning: Essays in honour of Sir John Lyons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 116–135.Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. (1988). The grammaticization of coordination. In: Haiman, J. and Thompson, S. A. (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 331–359.Google Scholar

Morales, Amparo. (1986). Gramáticas en contacto: Análisis sintáctico sobre el español de Puerto Rico. San Juan: Editorial Playor.Google Scholar

Munro, Pamela. (1980). Studies of switch-reference. UCLA papers in syntax 8. Stanford: UCLA.Google Scholar

Muysken, Pieter. (2013). Language contact outcomes as the result of bilingual optimization strategies. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16(4):709–730.Google Scholar

Muysken, Pieter. (2015). Déjà voodoo or new trails ahead? Re-evaluating the Mixing Typology Model. In: Torres Cacoullos, R., Dion, N., and Lapierre, A. (eds.), Linguistic variation: Confronting fact and theory New York: Routledge. 242–261.Google Scholar

Muysken, Pieter. (2016). Areal and Universalist Perspectives on Bilingual Compound Verbs. Languages 1(1):2, DOI:10.3390/languages1010002.Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, Carol. (1993). Duelling languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, Carol. (2002). Contact linguistics: Bilingual encounters and grammatical outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Myhill, John. (2005). Quantitative methods of discourse analysis. In: Köhler, R., Altmann, G., and Piotrowski, R. (eds.), Quantitive linguistik: Ein internationales handbuch. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. 471–497.Google Scholar

Myhill, John, and Xing, Zhiqun. (1996). Towards an operational definition of contrast. Studies in Language 20(2):303–360.Google Scholar

Myslín, Mark, and Levy, Roger. (2015). Code-switching and predictability of meaning in discourse. Language 91(4):871–905.Google Scholar

Nagy, Naomi, Aghdasi, Nina, Denis, Derek, and Motut, Alexandra. (2011). Null subjects in heritage languages: Contact effects in a cross-linguistic context. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 17(2): http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1202&context=pwpl.Google Scholar

Nagy, Naomi, and Meyerhoff, Miriam. (2015). Extending ELAN into variationist sociolinguistics (description and tutorial). Linguistic Vanguard ISSN (Online) 2199–174X, DOI: 10.1515/lingvan-2015–0012, October 2015Google Scholar

Napoli, Donna Jo. (1982). Initial material deletion in English. Glossa 16:85–111.Google Scholar

Naro, Anthony J. (1981). Morphological constraints on subject deletion. In: Sankoff, D. and Cedergren, H. (eds.) Variation Omnibus: Edmonton: Linguistic Research. 351–357.Google Scholar

Oh, Sun-Young. (2006). English zero anaphora as an interactional resource II. Discourse Studies 8(6):817.Google Scholar

Oh, Sun-Young. (2007). Overt reference to speaker and recipient in Korean. Discourse Studies 9(4):462–492.Google Scholar

Ono, Tsuyoshi, and Thompson, Sandra A. (1997). Deconstructing “zero anaphora” in Japanese. Berkeley Linguistics Society 23:481–491.Google Scholar

Orozco, Rafael. (2015). Pronominal variation in Colombian Costeño Spanish. In: Carvalho, A. M., Orozco, R., and Shin, N. L. (eds.), Subject pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal perspective. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press. 17–37.Google Scholar

Orozco, Rafael, and Guy, Gregory R. (2008). El uso variable de los pronombres sujetos: ¿qué pasa en la costa caribe colombiana? In: Westmore, M. and Thomas, J. A. (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 4th workshop on Spanish sociolinguistics. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. 70–80.Google Scholar

Otheguy, Ricardo. (2016). The linguistic competence of second-generation bilinguals: A critique of “incomplete acquisition”. In: Tortora, C., den Dikken, M., Montoya, I. L., and O’Neill, T. (eds.), Romance Linguistics 2013: Selected papers from the 43rd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), New York, 17–19 April, 2013. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 301–319Google Scholar

Otheguy, Ricardo, and Stern, Nancy. (2010). On so-called Spanglish. International Journal of Bilingualism 15(1):85–100.Google Scholar

Otheguy, Ricardo, and Zentella, Ana Cecilia. (2012). Spanish in New York: Language contact, dialect levelling, and structural continuity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Otheguy, Ricardo, Zentella, Ana Cecilia, and Livert, David. (2007). Language and dialect contact in Spanish of New York: Toward the formation of a speech community. Language 83(4):770–802.Google Scholar

Owens, Jonathan, Dodsworth, Robin, and Kohn, Mary. (2013). Subject expression and discourse embeddedness in Emirati Arabic. Language Variation and Change 25(2):255–285.Google Scholar

Paredes, Silva, and Vera, Lucia. (1993). Subject omission and functional compensation: Evidence from written Brazilian Portuguese. Language Variation and Change 5(1):35–49.Google Scholar

Parkinson, Dilworth B. (1987). Constraints on the presence/absence of “optional” subject pronouns in Egyptian Arabic. 15th Annual Conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation: 348–360.Google Scholar

Payne, Thomas E. (1997). Describing morphosyntax: A guide to field linguists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Penny, Ralph. (2000). Variation and change in Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Phillips, Betty S. (2001). Lexical diffusion, lexical frequency, and lexical analysis. In: Bybee, J. and Hopper, P. (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 123–136.Google Scholar

Pickering, Martin J., and Branigan, Holly P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language 39(4):633–651.Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, Janet, and Hirschberg, Julia. (1990). The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In: Cohen, P. R., Morgan, J., and Pollack, M. E. (eds.), Intentions in communication. Cambridge: MIT Press. 271–311.Google Scholar

Plaistowe, Jennifer. (2015). Coordinated code-switching? An investigation of language selection in bilingual conversation: Unpublished honours thesis: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana. (1979). Function and process in a variable phonology. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana. (1980a). The notion of the plural in Puerto Rican Spanish: Competing constraints on (s) deletion. In: Labov, W. (ed.), Locating language in time and space. New York: Academic Press. 55–67.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana. (1980b). “Sometimes I’ll start a sentence in Spanish y termino en español”: Toward a typology of code-switching. Linguistics 18(7/8):581–618.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana. (1981). Syntactic structure and social function of code-switching. In: Durán, R. P. (ed.), Latino language and communicative behavior. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation. 169–184.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana. (1983). Bilingual competence: Linguistic interference or grammatical integrity? In: Olivares, E. (ed.), Spanish in the US setting: Beyond the Southwest. Arlington: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education. 107–131.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana. (1989). The care and handling of a mega-corpus: The Ottowa-Hull French project. In: Fasold, R. and Schiffrin, D. (eds.), Language change and variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 411–451.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana. (1993). Variation theory and language contact: Concepts, methods and data. In: Preston, D. R. (ed.), American dialect research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 251–286.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana. (1997). The sociolinguistic dynamics of apparent convergence. In: Guy, G. R., Feagin, C., Schiffrin, D., and Baugh, J. (eds.), Towards a social science of language. Papers in honor of William Labov: Social interaction and discourse structures, vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 285–309.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana. (1998). Contrasting patterns of code-switching in two communities. In: Trudgill, P. and Cheshire, J. (eds.), The sociolinguistics reader: Multilingualism and variation, vol. 1. London: Arnold Publishers. 44–65.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana. (2000 [1980]). Sometimes I’ll start a sentence in Spanish y termino en español: Toward a typology of code-switching. In: Wei, L. (ed.), The bilingualism reader. London/New York: Routledge. 221–256.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana. (2001). Variability, frequency, and productivity in the irrealis domain in French. In: Bybee, J. and Hopper, P. J. (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 405–428.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana. (2015). Code Switching (Linguistic). In: Wright, J. D. (ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (2nd edn.). Oxford: Elsevier. 918–925.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana. (2017). Borrowing: Loanwords in the speech community and in the grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana, and Dion, Nathalie. (2012). Myths and facts about loanword development. Language Variation and Change 24(3):279–315.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana, and Levey, Stephen. (2010). Contact-induced grammatical change: A cautionary tale. In: Auer, P. and Schmidt, J. E. (eds.), Language and space: An international handbook of linguistic variation, vol. 1: Theories and methods. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 391–419.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana, and Meechan, Marjory. (1998). Introduction: How languages fit together in codemixing. International Journal of Bilingualism 2(2):127–138.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana, and Sankoff, David. (1984). Borrowing: The synchrony of integration. Linguistic Inquiry 22(1):99–135.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana, Sankoff, David, and Miller, Christopher. (1988). The social correlates and linguistic processes of lexical borrowing and assimilation. Linguistics 26(1):47–104.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana, and Tagliamonte, Sali. (2001). African American English in the diaspora. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana, Walker, James A., and Malcolmson, Rebecca. (2006). An English “like no other”?: Language contact and change in Quebec. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de Linguistique 51(2):185–213.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana, Zentz, Lauren, and Dion, Nathalie. (2012a). Phrase-final prepositions in Quebec French: An empirical study of contact, code-switching and resistance to convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15(2):203–225.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana, Zentz, Lauren, and Dion, Nathalie. (2012b). What counts as (contact-induced) change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15(2):247–254.Google Scholar

Posio, Pekka. (2012). The functions of postverbal pronominal subjects in spoken Peninsular Spanish and European Portuguese. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 5:149–190.Google Scholar

Posio, Pekka. (2013). The expression of first-person-singular subjects in spoken Peninsular Spanish and European Portuguese: Semantic roles and formulaic sequences. Folia Linguistica 47(1):253–291.Google Scholar

Posio, Pekka. (2015). Subject pronoun usage in formulaic sequences: Evidence from Peninsular Spanish. In: Carvalho, A. M., Orozco, R., and Shin, N. L. (eds.), Subject pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 59–78.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. (1982). Ritin’ Fowklower daun’ Rong: Folklorists’ Failures in Phonology. Journal of American Folklore 95:304–326.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. (1985). The Li’l Abner Syndrome: Written representations of speech. American Speech 60(4):328–336.Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, and Svartvik, Jan. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar

R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, http://www.R-project.orgGoogle Scholar

RAE [Real Academia Española], and AALE [Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española]. (2010). Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Manual. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar

Ramos, Miguel. (2016). Continuity and change: First person singular subject pronoun expression in earlier Spanish. Spanish in Context 13(1):103–127.Google Scholar

Ranson, Diana L. (1991). Person marking in the wake of /s/ deletion in Andalusian Spanish. Language Variation and Change 3(2):133–152.Google Scholar

Ranson, Diana L. (1999). Variable subject expression in Old and Middle French prose texts: The role of verbal ambiguity. Romance Quarterly 56(1):33–45.Google Scholar

Rickford, John R., and McNair-Knox, Faye. (1994). Addressee- and topic-influenced style shift: A quantitative sociolinguistic study. In: Biber, D. and Finegan, E. (eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register. New York: Oxford University Press. 235–276.Google Scholar

Rivas, Javier, and Brown, Esther L. (2009). No sé as a discourse marker in Spanish: A corpus-based approach to a cross-dialectal comparison. In: Sánchez, A. and Cantos, P. (eds.), A survey on corpus-based research: Panorama de investigaciones basadas en corpus. Murcia: AELINCO. 631–645.Google Scholar

Roberts, Ian, and Holmberg, Anders. (2010). Introduction: Parameters in minimalist theory. In: Biberauer, T., Holmberg, A., Roberts, I., and Sheehan, M. (eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1–57.Google Scholar

Roland, Douglas, Elman, Jeffrey L., and Ferreira, Victor S. (2006). Why is that? Structural prediction and ambiguity resolution in a very large corpus of English sentences. Cognition 98:245–272.Google Scholar

Ross, Malcolm. (2001). Contact-induced change in Oceanic languages in North-west Melanesia. In: Aikhenvald, A. Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 134–166.Google Scholar

Sánchez-Ayala, Ivo. (2001). Prosodic integration in Spanish complement constructions. In: Cienki, A., Luka, B. J., and Smith, M. B. (eds.), Conceptual and discourse factors in linguistic structure. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information. 201–213.Google Scholar

Sankoff, David. (1988a). Sociolinguistics and syntactic variation. In: Newmeyer, F. (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey (Vol. 4, Language: The socio-cultural context). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 140–161.Google Scholar

Sankoff, David. (1988b). Variable rules. In: Ammon, U., Dittmar, N., and Mattheier, K. J. (eds.), Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society, vol. 2. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 984–997.Google Scholar

Sankoff, David. (1998). A formal production-based explanation of the facts of code-switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1(1):39–50.Google Scholar

Sankoff, David, Dion, Nathalie, Brandts, Alex, Alvo, Mayer, Balasch, Sonia, and Adams, Jackie. (2015). Comparing variables in different corpora with context-based model-free variant probabilities. In: Torres Cacoullos, R., Dion, N., and Lapierre, A. (eds.), Linguistic variation: Confronting fact and theory. New York: Routledge. 335–346.Google Scholar

Sankoff, David, and Laberge, Suzanne. (1978). Statistical dependence among successive occurrences of a variable in discourse. In: Sankoff, D. (ed.), Linguistic variation: Models and methods. New York: Academic Press. 119–126.Google Scholar

Sankoff, David, and Poplack, Shana. (1981). A formal grammar for code-switching. Papers in Linguistics: International Journal of Human Communication 14(1):3–45.Google Scholar

Sankoff, David, Poplack, Shana, and Vanniarajan, Swathi. (1990). The case of the nonce loan in Tamil. Language Variation and Change 2(1):71–101.Google Scholar

Sankoff, David, Tagliamonte, Sali, and Smith, Eric. (2015). Goldvarb Yosemite: A variable rule application for Macintosh. University of Toronto. http://individual.utoronto.ca/tagliamonte/goldvarb.html.Google Scholar

Sankoff, Gillian. (2002). Linguistic outcomes of language contact. In: Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, P., and Schilling-Estes, N. (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change. Oxford: Blackwell. 638–668.Google Scholar

Scheibman, Joanne. (2000). I dunno: A usage-based account of the phonological reduction of don’t in American English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 32(1):105–124.Google Scholar

Scheibman, Joanne. (2001). Local patterns of subjectivity in person and verb type in American English conversation. In: Bybee, J. and Hopper, P. J. (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 61–89.Google Scholar

Scherre, Maria Marta Pereira, and Naro, Anthony J. (1991). Marking in discourse: “Birds of a feather.” Language Variation and Change 3(1):23–32.Google Scholar

Schoonbaert, Sofie, Hartsuiker, Robert J., and Pickering, Martin J. (2007). The representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilinguals: Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language 56(2):153–171.Google Scholar

Schwenter, Scott A. (1996). Some reflections on o sea: A discourse marker in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 25:855–874.Google Scholar

Serratrice, Ludovica. (2009). Carving up referential space: A priming account of pronoun use in Italian. In: Chandlee, J., Franchini, M., Lord, S., and Rheiner, G.-M. (eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville: Cascadilla Press. 468–479.Google Scholar

Shenk, Petra S. (2006). The interactional and syntactic importance of prosody in Spanish-English bilingual discourse. International Journal of Bilingualism 10(2):179–205.Google Scholar

Shin, Naomi Lapidus. (2014). Grammatical complexification in Spanish in New York: 3sg pronoun expression and verbal ambiguity. Language Variation and Change 26(3):303–330.Google Scholar

Shin, Naomi Lapidus, and Otheguy, Ricardo. (2013). Social class and gender impacting change in bilingual settings: Spanish subject pronoun use in New York. Language in Society 42:429–452.Google Scholar

Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann, and Maling, Joan. (2010). The Empty Left Edge Condition. In Putnam, M. (ed.), Exploring crash-proof grammars. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 59–86.Google Scholar

Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. (1982). Subject expression and placement in Mexican-American Spanish. In: Amastae, J. and Elías Olivares, L. (eds.), Spanish in the United States: Sociolinguistic aspects. New York: Cambridge University Press. 93–120.Google Scholar

Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. (1994). Language contact and change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. (1997). Avances en el estudio de la variación sintáctica: La expresión del sujeto. Cuadernos del Sur 27:35–49.Google Scholar

Silva-Corvalán, Carmen, and Enrique-Arias, Andrés. (2017). Sociolingüística y pragmática del español, 2nd edn. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Silva-Corvalán, Carmen, and Treffers-Daller, Jeanine (eds.). (2015). Language Dominance in bilinguals: Issues of measurement and operationalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Silveira, Agripino S. (2011). Subject expression in Brazilian Portuguese: Construction and frequency effects. Doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico.Google Scholar

Snider, Neal. (2009). Similarity and structural priming. In: Taatgen, N. and van Rijn, H. (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. 815–820.Google Scholar

Sorace, Antonella. (2004). Native language attrition and developmental instability at the syntax–discourse interface: Data, interpretations and methods. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(2):143–145.Google Scholar

Sorace, Antonella, and Serratrice, Ludovica. (2009). Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism 13(2):195–210.Google Scholar

Sorace, Antonella, Serratrice, Ludovica, Fillaci, Francesca, and Baldo, Michaela. (2009). Discourse conditions on subject pronoun realization: Testing the linguistic intuitions of older bilingual children. Lingua 119(3):460–477.Google Scholar

Spencer, Nancy J. (1973). Differences between linguists and nonlinguists in intuitions of grammaticality-acceptability. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2(2):83–98.Google Scholar

Stanford, James. (2008). A sociotonetic analysis of Sui dialect contact. Language Variation and Change 20(3):409–450.Google Scholar

Steuck, Jonathan. (2016). Exploring the syntax-semantics-prosody interface: Complement clauses in conversation. In: Cuza, A., Czerwionka, L., and Olson, D. (eds.), Inquiries in Hispanic linguistics: From theory to empirical evidence. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 73–94.Google Scholar

Steuck, Jonathan, and Torres Cacoullos, Rena. (2016). Code-switching and prosody: English-Spanish bilingual complements. Paper presented at the New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 45, Simon Fraser University/University of Victoria, November 3–6, 2016.Google Scholar

Stirling, Leslie. (2006). Switch-Reference. In: Brown, K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, vol. 12. Oxford: Elsevier. 316–323.Google Scholar

Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. (2005). Language users as creatures of habit: A corpus-based analysis of persistence in spoken English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(1):113–149.Google Scholar

Tamminga, Meredith. (2016). Persistence in phonological and morphological variation. Language Variation and Change 28:335–356.Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah. (1987). Repetition in conversation: Toward a poetics of talk. Language 63(3):574–605.Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah G. (2000). Linguistic areas and language history. In: Gilbers, D., Nerbonne, J., and Schaeken, J. (eds.), Languages in contact. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 311–327.Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah G. (2001). Language contact: An introduction. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah G. (2007). Language contact and deliberate change. Journal of Languages and Contact 1:41–62.Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah G. (2009). How to establish substratum interference. Senri Ethnological Studies 75:319–328.Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah G., and Kaufman, Terrence. (1988). Language contact, creolization and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Thompson, Sandra A. (2002). “Object Complements” and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26(1):125–163.Google Scholar

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. (1982). Double negation and eighteenth-century English grammars. Neophilologus 66(2):278–285.Google Scholar

Toribio, Almeida Jacqueline. (2000). Setting parametric limits on dialectal variation in Spanish. Lingua 110(5):315–341.Google Scholar

Torres Cacoullos, Rena. (2015). Gradual loss of analyzability: Diachronic priming effects. In: Adli, A., Kaufmann, G., and García, M. (eds.), Variation in language: System- and usage-based approaches. Berlin: de Gruyter. 267–289.Google Scholar

Torres Cacoullos, Rena, and Aaron, Jessi Elana. (2003). Bare English-origin nouns in Spanish: Rates, constraints and discourse functions. Language Variation and Change 15(3):289–328.Google Scholar

Torres Cacoullos, Rena, and Berry, Grant M. (2018). Language variation in US Spanish: Social factors. In: Potowski, K. (ed.), Handbook of Spanish as a Minority/Heritage Language. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Torres Cacoullos, Rena, and Ferreira, Fernanda. (2000). Lexical frequency and voiced labiodental-bilabial variation in New Mexican Spanish. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 19(2):1–17.Google Scholar

Torres Cacoullos, Rena, and Poplack, Shana. (2016). Code-switching in spontaneous bilingual speech, National Science Foundation 1624966.Google Scholar

Torres Cacoullos, Rena, and Travis, Catherine E. (2011). Testing convergence via code-switching: Priming and the structure of variable subject expression International Journal of Bilingualism 15(3):241–267.Google Scholar

Torres Cacoullos, Rena, and Travis, Catherine E. (2014). Prosody, priming and particular constructions: The patterning of English first-person singular subject expression in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 63: 19–34.Google Scholar

Torres Cacoullos, Rena, and Travis, Catherine E. (2015). Foundations for the study of subject pronoun expression in Spanish in contact with English: Assessing interlinguistic (dis)similarity via intralinguistic variability. In: Carvalho, A. M., Orozco, R., and Shin, N. L. (eds.), Subject pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal perspective. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press. 83–102.Google Scholar

Torres Cacoullos, Rena, and Travis, Catherine E. (To appear). Variationist typology: Shared probabilistic constraints across (non-)null subject languages. Linguistics.Google Scholar

Torres Cacoullos, Rena, and Walker, James A. (2009). On the persistence of grammar in discourse formulas: A variationist study of that. Linguistics 47(1):1–43.Google Scholar

Torres Cacoullos, Rena, and Walker, James A. (2011). Chapter 18: Collocations in grammaticalization and variation. In: Heine, B. and Narrog, H. (eds.), Handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 225–238.Google Scholar

Travis, Catherine E. (2005). Discourse markers in Colombian Spanish: A study in polysemy. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Travis, Catherine E. (2007). Genre effects on subject expression in Spanish: Priming in narrative and conversation. Language Variation and Change 19(2):101–135.Google Scholar

Travis, Catherine E., and Lindstrom, Amy M. (2016). Different registers, different grammars? Subject expression in English conversation and narrative. Language Variation and Change 28(1):103–128.Google Scholar

Travis, Catherine E., and Torres Cacoullos, Rena. (2012). What do subject pronouns do in discourse? Cognitive, mechanical and constructional factors in variation. Cognitive Linguistics 23(4):711–748.Google Scholar

Travis, Catherine E., and Torres Cacoullos, Rena. (2013). Making voices count: Corpus compilation in bilingual communities. Australian Journal of Linguistics 33(2):170–194.Google Scholar

Travis, Catherine E., and Torres Cacoullos, Rena. (2014). Stress on I: Debunking unitary contrast accounts Studies in Language 38(2):360–392.Google Scholar

Travis, Catherine E., and Torres Cacoullos, Rena. (2018). Discovering structure: Person and accessibility. In: Shin, N. L. and Erker, D. (eds.), First names – How theoretical primitives shape the search for linguistic structure (Festschrift in honor of Ricardo Otheguy). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Travis, Catherine E., Torres Cacoullos, Rena, and Kidd, Evan. (2017). Cross-language priming: A view from bilingual speech Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20(2):283–298.Google Scholar

United States Census Bureau. (2011). 2007–2011 5-Year American Community Survey, http://factfinder2.census.gov.Google Scholar

United States Census Bureau. (2014). 2010–2014 5-Year American Community Survey, http://factfinder2.census.gov.Google Scholar

van der Wel, Robrecht P.R.D., Fleckenstein, Robin M., Jax, Steven A., and Rosenbaum, David A. (2007). Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: Evidence for abstract spatiotemporal forms in human motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 33(5):1117–1126.Google Scholar

Walker, James A. (2010). Variation in Linguistic Systems. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Wasserstein, Ronald L., and Lazar, Nicole A. (2016). The ASA’s statement on p-Values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician 70(2):129–133.Google Scholar

Weiner, E. Judith, and Labov, William. (1983). Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics 19(1):29–58.Google Scholar

Weinreich, Uriel. (1953/1968). Languages in contact: Findings and problems. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William, and Herzog, Marvin I. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In: Lehmann, W. P. and Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium. Austin: University of Texas Press. 95–188.Google Scholar

Weir, Andrew. (2012). Left-edge deletion in English and subject omission in diaries. English Language and Linguistics 16(1):105–129.Google Scholar

Wilson, Damián Vergara, and Dumont, Jenny. (2015). The emergent grammar of bilinguals: The Spanish verb hacer ‘do’ with a bare English infinitive. International Journal of Bilingualism 19(4):444–458.Google Scholar

Winford, Donald. (2005). Contact-induced change: classification and processes. Diachronica 22(2):373–427.Google Scholar