Book contents
- Distributive Justice and World Trade Law
- Cambridge International Trade and Economic Law
- Distributive Justice and World Trade Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Table of Cases
- Table of Treaties, Instruments, and Official Documents
- Abbreviations
- Part I Foundations
- Part II Justice
- Part III Law
- Part IV Progress
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 September 2017
Book contents
- Distributive Justice and World Trade Law
- Cambridge International Trade and Economic Law
- Distributive Justice and World Trade Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Table of Cases
- Table of Treaties, Instruments, and Official Documents
- Abbreviations
- Part I Foundations
- Part II Justice
- Part III Law
- Part IV Progress
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Distributive Justice and World Trade LawA Political Theory of International Trade Regulation, pp. 323 - 335Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Abbott, K. W. (1996). “Defensive Unfairness: The Normative Structure of Section 301,” in Bhagwati, J. & Hudec, R. E. (Eds.), Fair Trade and Harmonization: Prerequisites for Free Trade? Volume 2 Legal Analysis: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Abdallah, H. (2005). “Oil Exports under GATT and the WTO,” OPEC Review, 29(4), 267–294.Google Scholar
Abizadeh, A. (2007). “Cooperation, Pervasive Impact, and Coercion: On the Scope (not Site) of Distributive Justice,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 35(4), 318–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abizadeh, A. (2008). “Democratic Theory and Border Coercion,” Political Theory, 36(1), 37–65.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J. A., & Yared, P. (2008). “Income and Democracy,” The American Economic Review, 98(3), 808–842.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2012). Why Nations Fail: Origins of Power, Poverty and Prosperity: Crown Publishers (Random House).Google Scholar
Ahn, D., & Lee, J. (2011). “Countervailing Duty against China: Opening a Pandora’s Box in the WTO System?” Journal of International Economic Law, 14(2), 329–368.Google Scholar
Ahn, D., & Messerlin, P. (2014). “United States–Anti-Dumping Measures on Certain Shrimp and Diamond Sawblades from China: Never Ending Zeroing in the WTO?” World Trade Review, 13(02), 267–279.Google Scholar
Ahn, D., & Moon, W. J. (2010). “Alternative Approach to Causation Analysis in Trade Remedy Investigations: ‘Cost of Production’ Test,” Journal of World Trade, 44, 1032.Google Scholar
Albin, C. (2001). Justice and Fairness in International Negotiation: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, L. A. (1983). “Zimmerman on Coercive Wage Offers,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 12(2), 160–164.Google Scholar
Alford, R. P. (2006). “Reflections on US-Zeroing: A Study in Judicial Overreaching by the WTO Appellate Body,” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 45, 196.Google Scholar
Alston, P. (2002). “Resisting the Merger and Acquisition of Human Rights by Trade Law: A Reply to Petersmann,” European Journal of International Law, 13(4), 815–844.Google Scholar
Andemariam, S. W. (2006) “Can (Should) Article XX (b) GATT Be a Defense against Inconsistencies with the SPS and TBT Agreements,” Journal of World Investment and Trade, 7(4), 519–544.Google Scholar
Anderson, S. (2011). “Coercion,” in Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2011 ed.): Stanford University.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1963). “War and Murder,” in Stein, W. (Ed.), Nuclear Weapons: A Catholic Response: Burns & Oates/Cardinal Books.Google Scholar
Armingeon, K., Milewicz, K., Peter, S., & Peters, A. (2011). “The Constitutionalisation of International Trade Law,” in Cottier, T. & Delimatsis, P. (Eds.), The Prospects of International Trade Regulation: From Fragmentation to Coherence: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, C. (2009). “Coercion, Reciprocity, and Equality beyond the State,” Journal of Social Philosophy, 40(3), 297–316.Google Scholar
Armstrong, C. (2013). “Resources, Rights and Global Justice: A Response to Kolers,” Political Studies, 62(1), 216–222.Google Scholar
Arneson, R. J. (2005). “Do Patriotic Ties Limit Global Justice Duties?” The Journal of Ethics, 9(1–2), 127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atik, J. (1996). “Science and International Regulatory Convergence,” Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 17, 736.Google Scholar
Atik, J. (1998). “Identifying Antidemocratic Outcomes: Authenticity, Self-Sacrifice, and International Trade,” University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law, 19, 229.Google Scholar
Augier, P., Gasiorek, M., & Lai Tong, C. (2005). “The Impact of Rules of Origin on Trade Flows,” Economic Policy, 20(43), 567–624.Google Scholar
Bacchus, J. (2014). “A Common Gauge: Harmonization and International Law,” Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 37, 1.Google Scholar
Bagnoli, C. (2011). “Constructivism in Metaethics,” in Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2014 ed.): Stanford University.Google Scholar
Bagwell, K., Mavroidis, P. C., & Staiger, R. W. (2002). “It’s a Question of Market Access,” The American Journal of International Law, 96(1), 56–76.Google Scholar
Bagwell, K., & Staiger, R. W. (1990). “A Theory of Managed Trade,” The American Economic Review, 80(4), 779–795.Google Scholar
Bagwell, K., & Staiger, R. W. (2001). “Strategic Trade, Competitive Industries and Agricultural Trade Disputes,” Economics & Politics, 13(2), 113–128.Google Scholar
Bagwell, K., & Staiger, R. W. (2002). The Economics of the World Trading System: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bagwell, K., & Staiger, R. W. (2006). “Will International Rules on Subsidies Disrupt the World Trading System?” The American Economic Review, 96(3), 877–895.Google Scholar
Bagwell, K., & Staiger, R. W. (2010). “Backward Stealing and Forward Manipulation in the WTO,” Journal of International Economics, 82(1), 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagwell, K., & Staiger, R. W. (2011a). Can the Doha Round be a Development Round? Setting a Place at the Table: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Bagwell, K., & Staiger, R. W. (2011b). “What Do Trade Negotiators Negotiate About? Empirical Evidence from the World Trade Organization,” The American Economic Review, 101, 1238–1273.Google Scholar
Bagwell, K., Staiger, R. W., & Sykes, A. O. (2013). “Border Instruments,” in Horn, H. & Mavroidis, P. C. (Eds.), Legal and Economic Principles of World Trade Law: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R. E. (2012). “The Case for a Multilateral Trade Organization,” in Narlikar, A., Daunton, M., & Stern, R. M. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook on the World Trade Organization: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barceló, J. J. (1991). “A History of GATT Unfair Trade Remedy Law – Confusion of Purposes,” World Economy, 14(3), 311–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, R. E. (1991). “Some Problems with Contract as Promise,” Cornell Law Review, 77, 1022.Google Scholar
Barry, B. (1973). The Liberal Theory of Justice: A Critical Examination of the Principal Doctrines in A Theory of Justice by John Rawls: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Barry, B. (1982). “Humanity and Justice in Global Perspective,” in Pennock, J. R. & Chapman, J. W. (Eds.), Nomox XXIV: Ethics, Economics and the Law: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Barry, B. (1989). Theories of Justice (Vol. 1): University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, C., & Valentini, L. (2009). “Egalitarian Challenges to Global Egalitarianism: A Critique,” Review of International Studies, 35(03), 485–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, L. (2002). “Article XX of GATT and the Problem of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: The Case of Trade Measures for the Protection of Human Rights,” Journal of World Trade, 36(2), 353–403.Google Scholar
Bartels, L. (2003). “The WTO Enabling Clause and Positive Conditionality in the European Community’s GSP Program,” Journal of International Economic Law, 6(2), 507–532.Google Scholar
Bartels, L. (2004). “The Separation of Powers in the WTO: How to Avoid Judicial Activism,” International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 53(04), 861–895.Google Scholar
Bartels, L. (2007). “The WTO Legality of the EU’s GSP+ Arrangement,” Journal of International Economic Law, 10(4), 869–886.Google Scholar
Bartels, L., & Häberli, C. (2010). “Binding Tariff Preferences for Developing Countries under Article II GATT,” Journal of International Economic Law, 13(4), 969–995.Google Scholar
Bartels, L., & Ortino, F. (2006). Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beckett, J. A. (2001). “Behind Relative Normativity: Rules and Process as Prerequisites of Law,” European Journal of International Law, 12(4), 627–650.Google Scholar
Beitz, C. R. (1979). Political Theory and International Relations: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Beitz, C. R. (1983). “Cosmopolitan Ideals and National Sentiment,” The Journal of Philosophy, 80(10), 591–600.Google Scholar
Beitz, C. R. (1999). Political Theory and International Relations (Revised ed.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Benvenisti, E. (2013). “Sovereigns as Trustees of Humanity: On the Accountability of States to Foreign Stakeholders,” The American Journal of International Law, 107(2), 295–333.Google Scholar
Berlin, I. (1997). The Proper Study of Mankind: An Anthology of Essays: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Besson, S. (2013). “The Allocation of Anti-poverty Rights Duties: Our Rights, but Whose Duties?” in Schefer, K. N. (Ed.), Poverty and the International Economic Legal System: Duties to the World’s Poor: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, J. (2002). “Afterword: The Question of Linkage,” The American Journal of International Law, 96(1), 126–134.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, J., Greenaway, D., & Panagariya, A. (1998). “Trading Preferentially: Theory and Policy,” The Economic Journal, 108(449), 1128–1148.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, J., & Ramaswami, V. K. (1963). “Domestic Distortions, Tariffs and the Theory of Optimum Subsidy,” Journal of Political Economy, 71(1), 44–50.Google Scholar
Bhala, R., & Keating, S. B. (2014). “Diversity within Unity: Import Laws of Islamic Countries on Haram (Forbidden) Products,” 47(3), The International Lawyer, 343.Google Scholar
Biber-Klemm, S., Burkard, M., Cottier, T., Jusoh, S., & Temmerman, M. (2011). “Challenges of Biotechnology in International Trade Regulation,” in Cottier, T. & Delimatsis, P. (Eds.), The Prospects of International Trade Regulation: From Fragmentation to Coherence: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bienen, D., & Mihretu, M. E. (2010). The Principle of Fairness and WTO Accession – An Appraisal and Assessment of Consequences. Paper presented at the Society of International Economic Law (SIEL), Second Biennial Global Conference, University of Barcelona.Google Scholar
Bigdeli, S. Z. (2011). “Resurrecting the Dead – The Expired Non-Actionable Subsidies and the Lingering Question of Green Space,” Manchester Journal of International Economic Law, 8, 2.Google Scholar
Bird, F., Vance, T., & Woolstencroft, P. (2009). “Fairness in International Trade and Investment: North American Perspectives,” Journal of Business Ethics, 84(3), 405–425.Google Scholar
Blake, M. (2001). “Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 30(3), 257–296.Google Scholar
Blake, M., & Smith, P. T. (2015). “International Distributive Justice,” in Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2015 ed.): Stanford University.Google Scholar
Borgen, C. J. (2009). “The Language of Law and the Practice of Politics: Great Powers and the Rhetoric of Self-Determination in the Cases of Kosovo and South Ossetia,” Chicago Journal of International Law, 10, 1.Google Scholar
Bown, C. P. (2011). “Developing Countries and Monitoring WTO Commitments in Response to the Global Economic Crisis,” in Cottier, T. & Elsig, M. (Eds.), Governing the World Trade Organization: Past, Present and Beyond Doha: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bown, C. P., & Prusa, T. J. (2011). “US Anti-Dumping: Much Ado about Zeroing,” in Martin, M. & Mattoo, A. (Eds.), Unfinished Business? The WTO’s Doha Agenda: Centre for Economic Policy Research/World Bank.Google Scholar
Bown, C. P., & Sykes, A. O. (2008). “The Zeroing Issue: A Critical Analysis of Softwood V,” in Horn, H. & Mavroidis, P. C. (Eds.), The WTO Case Law of 2004–5: Legal and Economic Analysis: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bown, C. P., & Trachtman, J. P. (2009). “Brazil – Measures Affecting Imports of Retreaded Tyres: A Balancing Act,” World Trade Review, 8(01), 85–135.Google Scholar
Brenton, P., & Manchin, M. (2003). “Making EU Trade Agreements Work: The Role of Rules of Origin,” World Economy, 26(5), 755–769.Google Scholar
Brock, G. (2015). “Global Justice,” in Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2015 ed.): Stanford University.Google Scholar
Broda, C., Limão, N., & Weinstein, D. E. (2008). “Optimal Tariffs and Market Power: The Evidence,” The American Economic Review, 98(5), 2032–2065.Google Scholar
Bronckers, M. C. (1996). “Rehabilitating Antidumping and Other Trade Remedies through Cost-Benefit Analyses,” Journal of World Trade, 30(2), 5–37.Google Scholar
Brou, D., & Ruta, M. (2012). “A Commitment Theory of Subsidy Agreements,” The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 13(1), 239–270.Google Scholar
Broude, T. (2003). “An Anti-Dumping ‘To Be or Not To Be’ in Five Acts: A New Agenda for Research and Reform,” Journal of World Trade, 37(2), 305–328.Google Scholar
Broude, T. (2010). “The WTO/GATS Mode 4, International Labor Migration Regimes and Global Justice,” in Pierik, R. & Werner, W. (Eds.), Cosmopolitanism in Context: Perspectives from International Law and Political Theory: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, A., & Stern, R. M. (2011). “Fairness in the WTO Trading System,” Goldman School of Public Policy Working Paper No. GSPP11–001.Google Scholar
Brownlie, I. (2008). Principles of Public International Law (7th ed.): Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, A. (1990). “Justice as Reciprocity versus Subject-Centered Justice,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 19(3), 227–252.Google Scholar
Buchanan, A. (2000). “Rawls’s Law of Peoples: Rules for a Vanished Westphalian World,” Ethics, 110(4), 697–721.Google Scholar
Buchanan, A. (2004). Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-determination: Moral Foundations for International Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bull, H. (1977). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Buthe, T. (2008). “The Globalization of Health and Safety Standards: Delegation of Regulatory Authority in the SPS Agreement of the 1994 Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization,” Law and Contemporary Problems, 71, 219.Google Scholar
Butt, D. (2012). “Global Equality of Opportunity as an Institutional Standard of Distributive Justice,” in Carmody, C., Garcia, F., & Linarelli, J. (Eds.), Global Justice and International Economic Law: Opportunities and Prospects: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Çali, B. (2009). “On Interpretivism and International Law,” European Journal of International Law, 20(3), 805–822.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. E., & Kelly, J. S. (2002). “Chapter 1 Impossibility Theorems in the Arrovian Framework,” in Arrow, K. J., Sen, A. K. & Kotaro, S. (Eds.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Caney, S. (2005). Justice beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caney, S. (2008). “Global Distributive Justice and the State,” Political Studies, 56(3), 487–518.Google Scholar
Caney, S. (2011). “Humanity, Associations and Global Justice: A Defence of Humanity-centred Cosmopolitan Egalitarianism,” The Monist, 94(4), 506–534.Google Scholar
Cappelen, A. W., Hagen, R. J., & Tungodden, B. (2007). “National Responsibility and the Just Distribution of Debt Relief,” Ethics & International Affairs, 21(1), 69–83.Google Scholar
Carmody, C. (2008). “A Theory of WTO Law,” Journal of International Economic Law, 11(3), 527–557.Google Scholar
Carmody, C., Garcia, F., & Linarelli, J. (Eds.). (2012). Global Justice and International Economic Law: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carr, E. H. (1946). The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations (2nd ed.): Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cass, D. Z. (2001). “The ‘Constitutionalization’ of International Trade Law: Judicial Norm-Generation as the Engine of Constitutional Development in International Trade,” European Journal of International Law, 12(1), 39–75.Google Scholar
Cass, D. Z. (2005). The Constitutionalization of the World Trade Organization: Legitimacy, Democracy, and Community in the International Trading System: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cass, R. A., & Boltuck, R. D. (1996). “Antidumping and Countervailing-Duty Law: The Mirage of Equitable International Competition,” in Bhagwati, J. & Hudec, R. E. (Eds.), Fair Trade and Harmonization: Prerequisites for Free Trade? Volume 2 Legal Analysis: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cassese, A. (1995). Self-Determination of Peoples: A Legal Reappraisal: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cavallero, E. (2010). “Coercion, Inequality and the International Property Regime,” Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(1), 16–31.Google Scholar
Cedro, R. R., & Vieira, B. F. (2010). “John Rawls’ Justice as Fairness and the WTO: A Critical Analysis on the Initial Position of the Multilateral Agricultural Negotiation,” The Law and Development Review, 3(2), 122–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, D. (2006). “Administrative Globalisation and Curbing the Excesses of the State,” in Joerges, C. & Petersmann, E.-U. (Eds.), Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation: Hart.Google Scholar
Chang, H. F. (2003). “Risk Regulation, Endogenous Public Concerns, and the Hormones Dispute: Nothing to Fear but Fear Itself,” Southern California Law Review, 77, 743.Google Scholar
Chang, H.-J. (2005). Why Developing Countries Need Tariffs?: How WTO NAMA Negotiations Could Deny Developing Countries’ Right to a Future: South Centre.Google Scholar
Charnovitz, S. (1991). “Exploring the Environmental Exceptions in GATT Article XX,” Journal of World Trade, 25(5), 37–55.Google Scholar
Charnovitz, S. (1997). “The Moral Exception in Trade Policy,” Virginia Journal of International Law, 38, 689.Google Scholar
Charnovitz, S. (1999). “The Supervision of Health and Biosafety Regulation by World Trade Rules,” Tulane Environmental Law Journal, 13, 271.Google Scholar
Charnovitz, S. (2002a). “The Law of Environmental PPMs in the WTO: Debunking the Myth of Illegality,” Yale Journal of International Law, 27, 59.Google Scholar
Charnovitz, S. (2002b). “Triangulating the World Trade Organization,” The American Journal of International Law, 96(1), 28–55.Google Scholar
Charnovitz, S. (2008). “Mapping the Law of WTO Accession,” in Janow, M. E., Donaldson, V., & Yanovich, A. (Eds.), WTO at Ten: Governance, Dispute Settlement and Developing Countries: Juris Publishing.Google Scholar
Charnovitz, S., & Fischer, C. (2015). “Canada – Renewable Energy: Implications for WTO Law on Green and Not-So-Green Subsidies,” World Trade Review, 14(2), 177–210.Google Scholar
Chayes, A., & Chayes, A. H. (1995). The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chayes, A., & Chayes, A. H. (2005). “The New Sovereignty,” in Hathaway, O. A. & Koh, H. H. (Eds.), Foundations of International Law: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Cheyne, I. (2006). “Risk and Precaution in World Trade Organization Law,” Journal of World Trade, 40(5), 837–864.Google Scholar
Cho, S. (2009). “The Demise of Development in the Doha Round Negotiations,” Texas International Law Journal, 45, 573.Google Scholar
Cho, S. (2012). “No More Zeroing?: The United States Changes Its Antidumping Policy to Comply with the WTO,” American Society of International Law Insights, 16(8) (March 9, 2012), 1.Google Scholar
Cho, S. (2015). The Social Foundations of World Trade: Norms, Community and Constitution: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Choi, W.-M. (2003). “Like Products” in International Trade Law: Towards a Consistent GATT/WTO Jurisprudence: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Choudhury, B., Gehne, K., Heri, S., Humbert, F., Kaufmann, C., & Schefer, K. N. (2011). “A Call for a WTO Ministerial Decision on Trade and Human Rights,” in Cottier, T. & Delimatsis, P. (Eds.), The Prospects of International Trade Regulation: From Fragmentation to Coherence: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Christiano, T. (2015). “Democracy,” in Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2015 ed.): Stanford University.Google Scholar
Clements, P. (2013). “Multilateral Development Banks and the International Monetary Fund,” in Linarelli, J. (Ed.), Research Handbook on Global Justice and International Economic Law: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (1997). “Where the Action Is: On the Site of Distributive Justice,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 26(1), 3–30.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (2006). “Casting the First Stone: Who Can, and Who Can’t, Condemn the Terrorists?” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 58, 113–136.Google Scholar
Cohen, J., & Sabel, C. (2006). “Extra Rempublicam Nulla Justitia?” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 34(2), 147–175.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. (1979). “Efficiency, Utility, and Wealth Maximization,” Hofstra Law Review, 8, 509.Google Scholar
Coleman, J., & Mendlow, G. (2010). “Theories of Tort Law,” in Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2010 ed.): Stanford University.Google Scholar
Collier, P., & Rohner, D. (2008). “Democracy, Development, and Conflict,” Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(2–3), 531–540.Google Scholar
Collier, P., & Venables, A. J. (2007). “Rethinking Trade Preferences: How Africa Can Diversify Its Exports,” World Economy, 30(8), 1326–1345.Google Scholar
Conrad, C. R. (2011). Processes and Production Methods (PPMs) in WTO Law: Interfacing Trade and Social Goals: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Copp, D. (1997). “Democracy and Communal Self-Determination,” in McKim, R. & McMahan, J. (Eds.), The Morality of Nationalism: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cottier, T. (2002). “Trade and Human Rights: A Relationship to Discover,” Journal of International Economic Law, 5(1), 111–132.Google Scholar
Cottier, T. (2013). “Poverty, Redistribution, and International Trade Regulation,” in Schefer, K. N. (Ed.), Poverty and the International Economic Legal System: Duties to the World’s Poor: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cottier, T., & Jackson, J. H. (2000). “Limits to International Trade: The Constitutional Challenge,” American Society of International Law Proceedings of the Annual Meeting, 94, 220–224.Google Scholar
Cottier, T., Pauwelyn, J., & Bürgi Bonanomi, E. (2005). Human Rights and International Trade: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, N. (2002). Argument and Change in World Politics Ethics, Decolonization, and Humanitarian Intervention: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crosby, D. C. (2009). “Tilting at Conventional WTO Wisdom,” in Cottier, T., Nartova, O., & Bigdeli, S. Z. (Eds.), International Trade Regulation and the Mitigation of Climate Change: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crowley, M. A. (2008). “Comment,” in Horn, H. & Mavroidis, P. C. (Eds.), The WTO Case Law of 2004–5: Legal and Economic Analysis: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crowley, M. A. (2010). “Why are Safeguards Needed in a Trade Agreement,” in Bagwell, K., Bermann, G. A., & Mavroidis, P. C. (Eds.), Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in International Trade: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cudd, A. (2012). “Contractarianism,” in Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2012 ed.): Stanford University.Google Scholar
Daunton, M. (2012). “The Inconsistent Quartet: Free Trade versus Competing Goals,” in Narlikar, A., Daunton, M., & Stern, R. M. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the World Trade Organization: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davey, W. J. (2006). “Reflections on the Appellate Body Decision in the Hormones Case and the Meaning of the SPS Agreement,” in Bermann, G. A. & Mavroidis, P. C. (Eds.), Trade and Human Health and Safety: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, A. (2009). “Interpreting the Chapeau of GATT Article XX in Light of the ‘New’ Approach in Brazil-Tyres,” Journal of World Trade, 43(3), 507–539.Google Scholar
Davies, G. (2007). “Morality Clauses and Decision Making in Situations of Scientific Uncertainty: The Case of GMOs,” World Trade Review, 6(2), 249–263.Google Scholar
Davis, L. (2009). “Anti-Dumping Investigation in the EU: How Does It Work?” European Centre for International Political Economy, 4, 23.Google Scholar
Deardoff, A. V. (2001). “Market Access for Developing Countries,” in Porter, R. B., Sauve, P., Subramanian, A., & Zampetti, A. B. (Eds.), Efficiency, Equity and Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium: Brookings.Google Scholar
Desmedt, A. (2001). “Proportionality in WTO Law,” Journal of International Economic Law, 4(3), 441–480.Google Scholar
Diamond, R. (1988). “Economic Foundations of Countervailing Duty Law,” Virginia Journal of International Law, 29, 767.Google Scholar
Diamond, R. (2008). “Privatization and The Definition of Subsidy: A Critical Study of Appellate Body Texturalism,” Journal of International Economic Law, 11(3), 649–678.Google Scholar
Dietsch, P. (2011). “Rethinking Sovereignty in International Fiscal Policy,” Review of International Studies, 37(05), 2107–2120.Google Scholar
Donahue, A. M. (2000). “Equivalence: Not Quite Close Enough for the International Harmonization of Environmental Standards,” Environmental Law, 30, 363.Google Scholar
Donnelly, J. (2008). “The Ethics of Realism,” in Reus-Smit, C. & Snidal, D. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, A. I., Mavroidis, P. C., & Sykes, A. O. (2008). The Genesis of the GATT: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drezner, D. W. (2007). All Politics is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Du, M. M. (2007). “Domestic Regulatory Autonomy under the TBT Agreement: From Non-Discrimination to Harmonization,” Chinese Journal of International Law, 6(2), 269–306.Google Scholar
Du, M. M. (2010). “Reducing Product Standards Heterogeneity through International Standards in the WTO: How Far across the River?” Journal of World Trade, 44(2), 295–318.Google Scholar
Du, M. M. (2011). “The Rise of National Regulatory Autonomy in the GATT/WTO Regime,” Journal of International Economic Law, 14(3), 639–675.Google Scholar
Dufek, P. (2013). “Why Strong Moral Cosmopolitanism Requires a World-State,” International Theory, 5(2), 177–212.Google Scholar
Dunne, T., Kurki, M., & Smith, S. (2007). International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dunoff, J. L. (1999). “The Death of the Trade Regime,” European Journal of International Law, 10(4), 733–762.Google Scholar
Dunoff, J. L. (2006a). “Constitutional Conceits: The WTO’s ‘Constitution’ and the Discipline of International Law,” European Journal of International Law, 17(3), 647–675.Google Scholar
Dunoff, J. L. (2006b). “Lotus Eaters: Reflections on the Varietals Dispute, the SPS Agreement, and WTO Dispute Resolution,” in Bermann, G. A. & Mavroidis, P. C. (Eds.), Health Trade and Human Health and Safety: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dunoff, J. L. (2010). “How Not to Think about Safeguards,” in Bagwell, K. W., Bermann, G. A., & Mavroidis, P. C. (Eds.), Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in International Trade: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dunoff, J. L., & Trachtman, J. P. (1999). “Economic Analysis of International Law,” Yale Journal of International Law, 24, 1.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (2002). Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (2013). “A New Philosophy for International Law,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 41(1), 2–30.Google Scholar
Eagleton-Pierce, M. (2013). Symbolic Power in the World Trade Organization: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Echols, M. A. (2001). Food Safety and the WTO: The Interplay of Culture, Science and Technology: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Emerton, P. (2009). “International Economic Justice: Is a Principled Liberalism Possible,” in Joseph, S., Kinley, D., & Waincymer, J. (Eds.), The World Trade Organization and Human Rights: Interdisciplinary Perspectives: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Endicott, T. (2010). “The Logic of Freedom and Power,” in Besson, S. & Tasioulas, J. (Eds.), The Philosophy of International Law: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Epps, T. (2008). “Reconciling Public Opinion and WTO Rules under the SPS Agreement,” World Trade Review, 7(2), 359–392.Google Scholar
Epps, T., & Green, A. (2010). Reconciling Trade and Climate: How the WTO Can Help Address Climate Change: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Eskelinen, T. (2011). “Global Basic Structure and Institutions: The WTO as a Practical Example,” Journal of Global Ethics, 7(1), 47–58.Google Scholar
Ethier, W. J. (2004). “Political Externalities, Nondiscrimination, and a Multilateral World,” Review of International Economics, 12(3), 303–320.Google Scholar
Evenett, S. J., & Hoekman, B. M. (2006). Economic Development and Multilateral Trade Cooperation: Palgrave Macmillan/World Bank.Google Scholar
Finger, J. M. (1992). “Dumping and Antidumping: The Rhetoric and the Reality of Protection in Industrial Countries,” The World Bank Research Observer, 7(2), 121–144.Google Scholar
Finger, J. M. (2001). “Implementing the Uruguay Round Agreements: Problems for Developing Countries,” The World Economy, 24(9), 1097–1108.Google Scholar
Finger, J. M. (2005). “A Diplomat’s Economics: Reciprocity in the Uruguay Round Negotiations,” World Trade Review, 4(01), 27–40.Google Scholar
Finger, J. M., & Artis, N. T. (1993). Antidumping: How It Works and Who Gets Hurt: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Finger, J. M., Ng, F., & Wangchuk, S. (2001). Antidumping as Safeguard Policy (Vol. 2730): World Bank Development Research Group.Google Scholar
Fischer, J. M., Ravizza, M., & Copp, D. (1993). “Quinn on Double Effect: The Problem of “Closeness’,” Ethics, 103(4), 707–725.Google Scholar
Fisher, E. (2006). “Beyond the Science/Democracy Dichotomy: The World Trade Organisaton Santiary and Phytosanitary Agreement and Administrative Constitutionalism,” in Joerges, C. & Petersmann, E.-U. (Eds.), Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation: Hart.Google Scholar
FitzPatrick, W. J. (2003). “Acts, Intentions, and Moral Permissibility: In Defence of the Doctrine of Double Effect,” Analysis, 63(280), 317–321.Google Scholar
Flett, J. (2010). “If in Doubt, Leave It Out – EU Precaution in WTO Regulatory Space,” European Journal of Risk Regulation, 1, 20.Google Scholar
Flett, J. (2013). “WTO Space for National Regulation: Requiem for a Diagonal Vector Test,” Journal of International Economic Law, 16(1), 37–90.Google Scholar
Follesdal, A. (2011). “The Distributive Justice of a Global Basic Structure: A Category Mistake?” Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 10(1), 46–65.Google Scholar
Foot, P. (1994). “The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect,” in Steinbock, B. & Norcross, A. (Eds.), Killing and Letting Die: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Footer, M. E. (2007). “Post-Normal Science in the Multilateral Trading System: Social Science Expertise and the EC-Biotech Panel,” World Trade Review, 6(2), 281–297.Google Scholar
Foster, C. E. (2009). “Public Opinion and the Interpretation of the World Trade Organisation’s Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures,” in Joseph, S., Kinley, D., & Waincymer, J. (Eds.), The World Trade Organization and Human Rights: Interdisciplinary Perspectives: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Franck, T. M. (1995). Fairness in International Law and Institutions: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Francois, J., Hoekman, B., & Manchin, M. (2006). “Preference Erosion and Multilateral Trade Liberalization,” The World Bank Economic Review, 20(2), 197–216.Google Scholar
Freeman, S. (2001). “Illiberal Libertarians: Why Libertarianism Is Not a Liberal View,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 30(2), 105–151.Google Scholar
Freeman, S. (2007). Justice and the Social Contract: Essays on Rawlsian Political Philosophy: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fried, C. (1981). Contract as Promise: A Theory of Contractual Obligation: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gaines, S. (2001). “The WTO’s Reading of the GATT Article XX Chapeau: A Disguised Restriction on Environmental Measures,” University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law, 22, 739.Google Scholar
Galeotti, M., & Kemfert, C. (2004). “Interactions between Climate and Trade Policies: A Survey,” Journal of World Trade, 38(4), 701–724.Google Scholar
Gallagher, K. P. (2007). “Understanding Developing Country Resistance to the Doha Round,” Review of International Political Economy, 15(1), 62–85.Google Scholar
Garcia, F. (2000). “Trade and Inequality: Economic Justice and the Developing World,” Michigan Journal of International Law, 21, 975–1049.Google Scholar
Garcia, F. (2003). Trade, Inequality, and Justice: Towards a Liberal Theory of Just Trade: Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar
Garcia, F. (2004). “Beyond Special and Differential Treatment,” Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 27, 291.Google Scholar
Garcia, F. (2006). “Why Trade Law Needs a Theory of Justice,” American Society of International Law Proceedings of the Annual Meeting, 100, 376–380.Google Scholar
Garcia, F. (2013). Global Justice and International Economic Law: Three Takes: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gaus, G. (2010). “Coercion, Ownership and the Redistributive State: Justificatory Liberalism’s Classical Tilt,” Social Philosophy and Policy, 27(01), 233–275.Google Scholar
Gian, W. (2014). “How General Should the General Exceptions Be?: A Critique of the ‘Common Intention’ Approach of Treaty Interpretation,” Journal of World Trade, 48(2), 219.Google Scholar
Gilpin, R. (1971). “The Politics of Transnational Economic Relations,” International Organization, 25(03), 398–419.Google Scholar
Goetz, C. J., Granet, L., & Schwartz, W. F. (1986). “The Meaning of ‘Subsidy’ and ‘Injury’ in the Countervailing Duty Law,” International Review of Law and Economics, 6(1), 17–32.Google Scholar
Goh, G. (2006). “Tipping the Apple Cart: The Limits of Science and Law in the SPS Agreement after Japan – Apples,” Journal of World Trade, 40(4), 655–686.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. L., & Posner, E. A. (2005). The Limits of International Law: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodin, R. E. (1988). “What Is So Special about Our Fellow Countrymen?” Ethics, 98(4), 663–686.Google Scholar
Gosepath, S. (2011). “Equality,” in Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2011 ed.): Stanford University.Google Scholar
Green, A., & Epps, T. (2007). “The WTO, Science, and the Environment: Moving towards Consistency,” Journal of International Economic Law, 10(2), 285–316.Google Scholar
Green, A., & Trebilcock, M. (2010). “The Enduring Problem of World Trade Organization Export Subsidies Rules,” in Bagwell, K., Bermann, G. A., & Mavroidis, P. C. (Eds.), Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in International Trade: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1995). “Trade Wars and Trade Talks,” Journal of Political Economy, 103(4), 675–708.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M., & Mavroidis, P. C. (2003). “US-Lead and Bismuth II United States – Imposition of Countervailing Duties on Certain Hot-Rolled Lead and Bismuth Carbon Steel Products Originating in the United Kingdom: Here Today, Gone Tomorrow? Privatization and the Injury Caused by Non-Recurring Subsidies,” in Horn, H. & Mavroidis, P. C. (Eds.), The WTO Case Law of 2001: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M., & Mavroidis, P. C. (2005a). “United States – Countervailing Measures concerning Certain Products from the European communities (WTO Doc. WT/DS212/AB/R): Recurring Misunderstanding of Non-Recurring Subsidies,” in Horn, H. & Mavroidis, P. C. (Eds.), The WTO Case Law of 2002: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M., & Mavroidis, P. C. (2005b). “United States – Definitive Safeguard Measures on Imports of Circular Welded Carbon Quality Line Pipe from Korea (WT/DS202; DSR 2002:IV, 1403; DSR 2002:IV, 1473; DSR 2002:V, 2061) Not for Attribution,” in Horn, H. & Mavroidis, P. C. (Eds.), The WTO Case Law of 2002: The American Law Institute Reporters’ Studies: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M., & Sykes, A. O. (2005). “A Preference for Development: The Law and Economics of GSP,” World Trade Review, 4(1), 41–67.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M., & Sykes, A. O. (2007). “WTO Case Law: The American Law Institute Reporter’s Studies United States – Definitive Safeguard Measures on Imports of Certain Steel Products,” World Trade Review, 6(01), 89–122.Google Scholar
Gruszczynski, L. (2006). “Science in the Process of Risk Regulation under the WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures,” German Law Journal, 7, 371.Google Scholar
Gruszczynski, L. (2010). Regulating Health and Environmental Risks under WTO Law: A Critical Analysis of the SPS Agreement: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gruszczynski, L. (2011). “How Deep Should We Go? Searching for an Appropriate Standard of Review in the SPS Cases,” European Journal of Risk Regulation, 1, 111.Google Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, A., & Jones Luong, P. (2006). “Democratization: Post-Communist Implications,” in Weingast, B. R. & Wittman, D. A. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guy, K. M. (2007). When Champagne Became French: Wine and the Making of a National Identity: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Guzman, A. T. (2004a). “Food Fears: Health and Safety at the WTO,” Virginia Journal of International Law, 45, 1.Google Scholar
Guzman, A. T. (2004b). “Global Governance and the WTO,” Harvard International Law Journal, 45, 303.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1955). “Are There Any Natural Rights?” The Philosophical Review, 64(2), 175–191.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1958). “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals,” Harvard Law Review, 71(4), 593–629.Google Scholar
Hasenclever, A., Mayer, P., & Rittberger, V. (1997). Theories of International Regimes: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hathaway, C. M., Horlick, G., Stewart, T., Ellard, A., & Mastel, G. (2003). “Antidumping, Countervailing Duties and Trade Remedies: Let’s Make a Deal?” The International Lawyer, 37, 821.Google Scholar
Heiskanen Veijo, A. (2004). “The Regulatory Philosophy of International Trade Law,” Journal of World Trade, 38, 1–36.Google Scholar
Hizon, E. M. (1994). “The Safeguard Measure/VER Dilemma: The Jekyll and Hyde of Trade Protection,” Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 15, 105.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1996). Leviathan (1651) (Rev. ed., Tuck, R. ed.): Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoekman, B. (2005). “Operationalizing the Concept of Policy Space in the WTO: Beyond Special and Differential Treatment,” Journal of International Economic Law, 8(2), 405–424.Google Scholar
Hoekman, B., & Kostecki, M. M. (2009). The Political Economy of the World Trading System: The WTO and Beyond (3rd ed.): Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoekman, B., & Prowse, S. (2005). “Economic Policy Responses to Preference Erosion: From Trade as Aid to Aid for Trade,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 3721.Google Scholar
Hoekman, B., & Trachtman, J. (2010). “Continued Suspense: EC – Hormones and WTO Disciplines on Discrimination and Domestic Regulation Appellate Body Reports: Canada/United States – Continued Suspension of Obligations in the EC – Hormones Dispute, WT/DS320/AB/R, WT/DS321/AB/R, adopted 14 November 2008,” World Trade Review, 9(1), 151.Google Scholar
Hollis, M., & Smith, S. (1990). Explaining and Understanding International Relations: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Holtug, N. (2011). “The Cosmopolitan Strikes Back: A Critical Discussion of Miller on Nationality and Global Equality,” Ethics and Global Politics, 4(3), 147–163.Google Scholar
Horn, H., Maggi, G., & Staiger, R. W. (2010). “Trade Agreements as Endogenously Incomplete Contracts,” The American Economic Review, 100(1), 394–419.Google Scholar
Horn, H., & Mavroidis, P. C. (2003). “US – Lamb United States – Safeguard Measures on Imports of Fresh, Chilled or Frozen Lamb Meat from New Zealand and Australia: What Should Be Required of a Safeguard Investigation?” World Trade Review, 2(03), 395–430.Google Scholar
Horn, H., & Mavroidis, P. C. (2004). “Still Hazy after All These Years: The Interpretation of National Treatment in the GATT/WTO Case-Law on Tax Discrimination,” European Journal of International Law, 15(1), 39–69.Google Scholar
Horn, H., & Mavroidis, P. C. (2005). “United States – Preliminary Determination with Respect to Certain Softwood Lumber from Canada – What Is a Subsidy?” in Horn, H. & Mavroidis, P. C. (Eds.), The WTO Case Law of 2002: The American Law Institute Reporters’ Studies: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Horn, H., & Weiler, J. H. H. (2005). “European Communities – Trade Description of Sardines: Textualism and Its Discontent,” in Horn, H. & Mavroidis, P. C. (Eds.), The WTO Case Law of 2002: The American Law Institute Reporters’ Studies: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Howse, R. (1999). “The World Trade Organization and the Protection of Workers’ Rights,” Journal of Small and Emerging Business Law, 3, 131.Google Scholar
Howse, R. (2000). “Democracy, Science, and Free Trade: Risk Regulation on Trial at the World Trade Organization,” Michigan Law Review, 98(7), 2329–2357.Google Scholar
Howse, R. (2001). “Adjudicative Legitimacy and Treaty Interpretation in International Trade Law: The Early Years of WTO Jurisprudence,” in Weiler, J. H. H. (Ed.), The EU, the WTO, and the NAFTA: Towards a Common Law of International Trade: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Howse, R. (2002a). “Back to Court after Shrimp/Turtle – Almost but Not Quite Yet: India’s Short Lived Challenge to Labor and Environmental Exceptions in the European Union’s Generalized System of Preferences,” American University International Law Review, 18, 1333.Google Scholar
Howse, R. (2002b). “From Politics to Technocracy – and Back Again: The Fate of the Multilateral Trading Regime,” The American Journal of International Law, 96, 94–117.Google Scholar
Howse, R. (2002c). “How to Begin to Think about the ‘Democratic Deficit’ at the WTO,” in Griller, S. (Ed.), International Economic Governance and Non Economic Concerns: Springer.Google Scholar
Howse, R. (2002d). “Human Rights in the WTO: Whose Rights, What Humanity? Comment on Petersmann,” European Journal of International Law, 13(3), 651–659.Google Scholar
Howse, R. (2002e). “The Sardines Panel and AB Rulings – Some Preliminary Reactions,” Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 29(3), 247–254.Google Scholar
Howse, R. (2003). “India’s WTO Challenge to Drug Enforcement Conditions in the European Community Generalized System of Preferences: A Little Known Case with Major Repercussions for Political Conditionality in US Trade Policy,” Chicago Journal of International Law, 4, 385.Google Scholar
Howse, R. (2006). “A New Device for Creating International Legal Normativity: The WTO Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement and ‘International Standards’,” in Petersmann, E.-U. & Joerges, C. (Eds.), Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation: Hart.Google Scholar
Howse, R. (2008). “Human Rights, International Economic Law and Constitutional Justice: A Reply,” European Journal of International Law, 19(5), 945–953.Google Scholar
Howse, R. (2010). “Do World Trade Organization Disciplines on Domestic Subsidies Make Sense? The Case for Legalizing Some Subsidies,” in Bagwell, K., Bermann, G. A., & Mavroidis, P. C. (Eds.), Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in International Trade: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Howse, R., & Horn, H. (2009). “European Communities – Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products,” World Trade Review, 8(1), 49–83.Google Scholar
Howse, R., & Langille, J. (2012). “The Seal Products Dispute and Why the WTO Should Accept Trade Restrictions Justified by Noninstrumental Moral Values,” Yale Journal of International Law, 37, 367.Google Scholar
Howse, R., Langille, J., & Sykes, K. (2015). “Pluralism in Practice: Moral Legislation and the Law of the WTO after Seal Products,” George Washington International Law Review, 48, 81–150.Google Scholar
Howse, R., & Levy, P. I. (2013). “The TBT Panels: US–Cloves, US–Tuna, US–Cool,” World Trade Review, 12(02), 327–375.Google Scholar
Howse, R., & Neven, D. (2003). “Argentina – Ceramic Tiles Argentina – Definitive Anti-Dumping Measures on Imports of Ceramic Floor Tiles from Italy,” in Horn, H. & Mavroidis, P. C. (Eds.), The WTO Case Law of 2001: The American Law Institute Reporters’ Studies: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Howse, R., & Nicolaidis, K. (2001). “Legitimacy and Global Governance: Why Constitutionalizing the WTO Is a Step Too Far,” in Porter, R. B., Sauve, P., Subramanian, A., & Zampetti, A. B. (Eds.), Efficiency, Equity and Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Howse, R., & Nicolaidis, K. (2003). “Enhancing WTO Legitimacy: Constitutionalization or Global Subsidiarity?” Governance, 16(1), 73–94.Google Scholar
Howse, R., & Regan, D. H. (2000). “The Product/Process Distinction – An Illusory Basis for Disciplining ‘Unilateralism’ in Trade Policy,” European Journal of International Law, 11(2), 249–289.Google Scholar
Howse, R., & Teitel, R. (2009). “Beyond the Divide: The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the World Trade Organization,” in Joseph, S., Kinley, D., & Waincymer, J. (Eds.), The World Trade Organization and Human Rights: Interdisciplinary Perspectives: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Howse, R., & Teitel, R. (2011). “Global Justice, Poverty and the International Economic Order,” in Besson, S. & Tasioulas, J. (Eds.), The Philosophy of International Law: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hudec, R. E. (1992). “Circumventing Democracy: The Political Morality of Trade Negotiations,” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 25, 311.Google Scholar
Hudec, R. E. (1996). “Introduction to the Legal Studies,” in Bhagwati, J. & Hudec, R. E. (Eds.), Fair Trade and Harmonization: Prerequisites for Free Trade? Volume 2 Legal Analysis: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hudec, R. E. (1998). “GATT/WTO Constraints on National Regulation: Requiem for an Aim and Effects Test,” The International Lawyer, 32(3), 619–649.Google Scholar
Hudec, R. E. (2003). “Science and Post-Discriminatory WTO Law,” Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 26, 185.Google Scholar
Hudec, R. E. (2011). Developing Countries in the GATT Legal System (New ed.): Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hudec, R. E., & Bhagwati, J. (1996). Fair Trade and Harmonization: Prerequisites for Free Trade?: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hufbauer, G. C., & Erb, J. S. (1984). Subsidies in International Trade: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (2000). Treatise on Human Nature (1738) (Norton, David F. & Norton, Mary J. eds.): Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hurka, T. (1997). “The Justification of National Partiality,” in McKim, R. & McMahan, J. (Eds.), The Morality of Nationalism: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hurrell, A. (2007). On Global Order: Power, Values, and the Constitution of International Society: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inayatullah, N., & Blaney, D. L. (1995). “Realizing Sovereignty,” Review of International Studies, 21(1), 3–20.Google Scholar
Irish, M. (2007). “GSP Tariffs and Conditionality: A Comment on EC – Preferences,” Journal of World Trade, 41(4), 683–698.Google Scholar
Irwin, D. A., Mavroidis, P. C., & Sykes, A. O. (2008). The Genesis of the GATT: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Isaac, G. E., & Kerr, W. A. (2003). “Genetically Modified Organisms at the World Trade Organization: A Harvest of Trouble,” Journal of World Trade, 37(6), 1083–1095.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. H. (1989a). “Perspectives on Countervailing Duties,” Law and Policy in International Business, 21, 739.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. H. (1989b). The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. H. (1997). The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations (2nd ed.): MIT press.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. H. (2002). “Afterword: The Linkage Problem – Comments on Five Texts,” The American Journal of International Law, 96(1), 118–125.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. H. (2003). “Sovereignty-Modern: A New Approach to an Outdated Concept,” The American Journal of International Law, 97(4), 782–802.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. H. (2006). Sovereignty, the WTO and Changing Fundamentals of International Law: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jaiswal, A. K. (2003). “WTO Agreement on SPS: Strategic Implications,” Economic and Political Weekly, 38(45), 4737–4742.Google Scholar
James, A. (2005). “Constructing Justice for Existing Practice: Rawls and the Status Quo,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 33(3), 281–316.Google Scholar
James, A. (2012a). Fairness in Practice: A Social Contract for a Global Economy: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
James, A. (2012b). “Global Economic Fairness: Internal Principles,” in Carmody, C., Garcia, F., & Linarelli, J. (Eds.), Global Justice and International Economic Law: Opportunities and Challenges.Google Scholar
Joerges, C., & Petersmann, E.-U. (Eds.). (2006). Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation: Hart.Google Scholar
Johnson, H. G. (1953). “Optimum Tariffs and Retaliation,” The Review of Economic Studies, 21(2), 142–153.Google Scholar
Johnstone, I. (2003). “Security Council Deliberations: The Power of the Better Argument,” European Journal of International Law, 14(3), 437–480.Google Scholar
Jonas, D. S., & Saunders, T. N. (2010). “The Object and Purpose of a Treaty: Three Interpretive Methods,” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 43, 565.Google Scholar
Jones, K. (2004). “The Safeguards Mess Revisited: The Fundamental Problem,” World Trade Review, 3(01), 83–91.Google Scholar
Jörke, D. (2013). “The Power of Reason in International Negotiations: Notes on Risse, Müller, and Deitelhoff,” Critical Policy Studies, 7(3), 350–363.Google Scholar
Joseph, S. (2009). “Democratic Deficit, Participation and the WTO,” in Joseph, S., Kinley, D., & Waincymer, J. (Eds.), The World Trade Organization and Human Rights: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Ju, J., & Wei, S.-J. (2011). “When Is Quality of Financial System a Source of Comparative Advantage?” Journal of International Economics, 84(2), 178–187.Google Scholar
Julius, A. J. (2003). “Basic Structure and the Value of Equality,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 31(4), 321–355.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M., Slovic, P., Braman, D., & Castil, J. (2006). “Fear of Democracy: A Cultural Evaluation of Sunstein of Risk,” Harvard Law Review, 119, 1071–1109.Google Scholar
Kamm, F. M. (1989). “Harming Some to Save Others,” Philosophical Studies, 57(3), 227–260.Google Scholar
Kamm, F. M. (1992). “Non-Consequentialism, the Person as an End-in-Itself, and the Significance of Status,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 21(4), 354–389.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1991). Kant: Political Writings (2nd ed.) (Reiss, H. S. ed., Nisbet, H. B. trans.): Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1996). Practical Philosophy. (Gregor, M. J. ed. and trans.): Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kapstein, E. B. (2006). Economic Justice in an Unfair World: Toward a Level Playing Field: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kapterian, G. (2010). “A Critique of the WTO Jurisprudence on ‘Necessity’,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 59(01), 89–127.Google Scholar
Karapinar, B. (2011). “China’s Export Restriction Policies: Complying with ‘WTO plus’ or Undermining Multilateralism,” World Trade Review, 10(03), 389–408.Google Scholar
Kawaharu, A. (2006). “Principles of Non-Discrimination in Tarrif Preferences Schemes: The WTO Appellate Body’s Decision in EC-Preferences and the Policy Impact on the European Union,” New Zealand Year Book of International Law, 3, 43–67.Google Scholar
Keene, E. (2002). Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, C. (2006). “Power, Linkage and Accommodation: The WTO as an International Actor and Its Influence on Other Actors and Regimes,” Berkeley Journal of International Law, 24, 79–128.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P. M. (1987). The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000: Random House.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2001). “The Club Model of Multilateral Cooperation and Problems of Democratic Legitimacy,” in Porter, B., Sauve, P., Subramanian, A., & Zampetti, A. B. (Eds.), Efficiency, Equity and Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Khan, M. H. (2005). “Markets, States and Democracy: Patron–Client Networks and the Case for Democracy in Developing Countries,” Democratization, 12(5), 704–724.Google Scholar
Kim, J. B. (2002). “Fair Price Comparison in the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement Recent WTO Panel Decisions against the ‘Zeroing’ Method,” Journal of World Trade, 36(1), 39–56.Google Scholar
Kirgis, F. L. (1994). “The Degrees of Self-Determination in the United Nations Era,” The American Journal of International Law, 88(2), 304–310.Google Scholar
Kirshner, J. (2012). “The Tragedy of Offensive Realism: Classical Realism and the Rise of China,” European Journal of International Relations, 18(1), 53–75.Google Scholar
Kishore, P. (2011). “Conditionalities in the Generalized System of Preference as Instruments of Global Economic Governance,” The International Lawyer, 45(3), 895–902.Google Scholar
Klabbers, J. (2006). “The Right to Be Taken Seriously: Self-Determination in International Law,” Human Rights Quarterly, 28(1), 186–206.Google Scholar
Kolers, A. (2009). Land, Conflict, and Justice: A Political Theory of Territory: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kolers, A. (2012). “Justice, Territory and Natural Resources,” Political Studies, 60(2), 269–286.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. (2005). From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (Reissue with a New Epilogue): Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kovavic, W. E. (2010). “Price Differentiation in Antitrust and Trade Instruments,” in Bagwell, K., Bermann, G. A., & Mavroidis, P. C. (Eds.), Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in International Trade: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krajewski, M. (2011). “Legitimising Global Economic Governance through Transnational Parliamentarisation: How Far Have We Come? How Much Further Must We Go?” in Cottier, T. & Elsig, M. (Eds.), Governing the World Trade Organization: Past, Present and Beyond Doha: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, S. D. (1985). Structural Conflict: The Third World against Global Liberalism: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, F. (1986). “Of Systems, Boundaries, and Territoriality: An Inquiry into the Formation of the State System,” World Politics, 39(1), 27–52.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. R. (1992). “Does the New Trade Theory Require a New Trade Policy?” World Economy, 15(4), 423–442.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. R. (1997). “What Should Trade Negotiators Negotiate About?” Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 113–120.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. R., Obstfeld, M., & Melitz, M. J. (2012). International Economics: Theory and Policy (9th ed.): Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Kumm, M. (2013). “The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: An Integrated Conception of Public Law,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20(2), 605–628.Google Scholar
Kuper, A. (2000). “Rawlsian Global Justice: Beyond the Law of Peoples to a Cosmopolitan Law of Persons,” Political Theory, 28(5), 640–674.Google Scholar
Kurjanska, M., & Risse, M. (2008). “Fairness in Trade II: Export Subsidies and the Fair Trade Movement,” Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 7(1), 29–56.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W. (1996). Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W. (2002). Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction (2nd ed.): Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, D. A. (2008). “The State and International Relations,” in Reus-Smit, C. & Snidal, D. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lamond, G. (2000). “The Coerciveness of Law,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 20(1), 39–62.Google Scholar
Lamy, P. (2013). “China Should Be More Active in Global Economic Governance, Lamy Tells Beijing Forum,” Speech to the China Development Forum, Beijing, 24 March 2013: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
Lamy, P., & Goldin, I. (2014). “Addressing the Global Governance Deficit,” Huffington Post, 22 March 2014 (Retrieved 16 December 2016)Google Scholar
Lang, A. (2006). “Reconstructing Embedded Liberalism: John Gerard Ruggie and Constructivist Approaches to the Study of the International Trade Regime,” Journal of International Economic Law, 9(1), 81–116.Google Scholar
Lang, A. (2007). “Reflecting on ‘Linkage’: Cognitive and Institutional Change in the International Trading System,” The Modern Law Review, 70(4), 523–549.Google Scholar
Lang, A. (2011). World Trade Law after Neoliberalism: Reimagining the Global Economic Order: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lang, A. (2014). “Governing ‘As If’: Global Subsidies Regulation and the Benchmark Problem,” Current Legal Problems, 67(1), 135–168.Google Scholar
Lang, A., & Scott, J. (2009a). “The Hidden World of WTO Governance,” European Journal of International Law, 20(3), 575–614.Google Scholar
Lang, A., & Scott, J. (2009b). “The Hidden World of WTO Governance: A Rejoinder to Richard H. Steinberg,” European Journal of International Law, 20(4), 1073–1076.Google Scholar
Langland, E. (2008). “United States-Final Anti-Dumping Measures on Stainless Steel from Mexico: Row over Zoning Reveals Judicial Quagmire,” Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law, 17, 555.Google Scholar
Lee, Y.-S. (2001). “Destabilization of the Discipline on Safeguards? Inherent Problems with the Continuing Application of Article XIX after the Settlement of the Agreement on Safeguards,” Journal of World Trade, 35(6), 1235–1246.Google Scholar
Lee, Y.-S. (2006a). “Comments on the Recent Debate on Safeguards – Difference in Perspectives, Not a Failure of Appreciation,” Journal of World Trade, 40(6), 1145–1147.Google Scholar
Lee, Y.-S. (2006b). “Not Without a Clue: Commentary on ‘the Persistent Puzzles of Safeguards’,” Journal of World Trade, 40(2), 385–404.Google Scholar
Leitner, K., & Lester, S. (2016). “WTO Dispute Settlement 1995–2015 – A Statistical Analysis,” Journal of International Economic Law, 19(1), 289–300.Google Scholar
Lerner, A. P. (1936). “The Symmetry between Import and Export Taxes,” Economica, 3(11), 306–313.Google Scholar
Lester, S. (2008). “United States: Final Anti-Dumping Measures on Stainless Steel from Mexico,” The American Journal of International Law, 102(4), 834–841.Google Scholar
Lester, S. (2011). “The Problem of Subsidies as a Means of Protectionism: Lessons from the WTO EC – Aircraft Case,” Melbourne Journal of International Law, 12, 345.Google Scholar
Lester, S., Mercurio, B., & Davies, A. (2012). World Trade Law: Texts, Materials and Commentary (2nd ed.): Hart.Google Scholar
Lim, C. L. (2012). “The Conventional Morality of Trade,” in Carmody, C., Garcia, F., & Linarelli, J. (Eds.), Global Justice and International Economic Law: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Linarelli, J. (2006). “What Do We Owe Each Other in the Global Economic Order?: Constructivist and Contractualist Accounts,” Journal of Transnational Law and Policy, 15, 181–218.Google Scholar
Lindauer, D. L., Pritchett, L., Rodrik, D., & Eckhaus, R. S. (2002). “What’s the Big Idea? The Third Generation of Policies for Economic Growth,” Economia, 3(1), 1–36.Google Scholar
Lindsey, B. (1999). The U.S. Antidumping Law: Rhetoric versus Reality: Trade Policy Analysis No. 7: Cato Institute Center for Trade Policy Studies.Google Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2008). “Inequality, Incentives and the Interpersonal Test,” Ratio, 21(4), 421–439.Google Scholar
Lipson, C. (1984). “International Cooperation in Economic and Security Affairs,” World Politics, 37(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
Livermore, M. A. (2006). “Authority and Legitimacy in Global Governance: Deliberation, Institutional Differentiation, and the Codex Alimentarius,” New York University Law Review, 81, 766.Google Scholar
Loriaux, S. (2012). “Fairness in International Economic Cooperation: Moving beyond Rawls’s Duty of Assistance,” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 15(1), 19–39.Google Scholar
Lovett, F. (2014). “Republicanism,” in Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2014 ed.): Stanford University.Google Scholar
Lowenfeld, A. F. (1980). “Fair or Unfair Trade: Does it Matter,” Cornell International Law Journal, 13, 205.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. (1984). Is Patriotism a Virtue? (The Lindley Lecture, 26 March 1984): University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Macleod, A. M. (2008). “Rawls’s Narrow Doctrine of Human Rights” in Martin, R. and Reidy, D. A. (Eds.), Rawls’s Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia?: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Maduro, M. P. (2001). “Is There Any such Thing as Free or Fair Trade? A Constitutional Analysis of the Impact of International Trade on the European Social Model,” in De Búrca, Gráinne & Scott, Joanne (Eds.), The EU and the WTO: Legal and Constitutional Issues: Hart, 257–282.Google Scholar
Maffettone, P. (2009). “The WTO and the Limits of Distributive Justice,” Philosophy & Social Criticism, 35(3), 243–267.Google Scholar
Maggi, G., & Rodriguez-Clare, A. (1998). “The Value of Trade Agreements in the Presence of Political Pressures,” Journal of Political Economy, 106(3), 574–601.Google Scholar
Marceau, G. (2002). “WTO Dispute Settlement and Human Rights,” European Journal of International Law, 13(4), 753–814.Google Scholar
Marceau, G. (2013). “The New TBT Jurisprudence in US-Clove Cigarettes, WTO US-Tuna II, and US-Cool,” Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy, 8(1), 1.Google Scholar
Marceau, G., & Trachtman, J. P. (2002). “The Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade: A Map of the World Trade Organization Law of Domestic Regulation of Goods,” Journal of World Trade, 36(5), 811–882.Google Scholar
Margalit, A., & Raz, J. (1990). “National Self-Determination,” Journal of Philosophy, 87(9), 439–461.Google Scholar
Markus, K. (2001). “Democratic Legitimacy and Constitutional Perspectives of WTO Law,” Journal of World Trade, 35(1), 167–186.Google Scholar
Martin, R. (2006). “Rawls on International Distributive Economic Justice: Taking a Closer Look,” in Martin, R. & Reidy, D. A. (Eds.), Rawls’s Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia?: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Martin, W., Mattoo, A., & Winkler, D. (2011). “Introduction,” in Martin, W. & Mattoo, A. (Eds.), Unfinished Business? The WTO’s Doha Agenda: World Bank / Centre for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar
Maruyama, W. H. (1998). “A New Pillar of the WTO: Sound Science,” The International Lawyer, 32(3), 651–677.Google Scholar
Maskus, K. E., Otsuki, T., & Wilson, J. S. (2005). “The Cost of Compliance with Product Standards for Firms in Developing Countries: An Econometric Study,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 3590.Google Scholar
Mathis, J. (2002). “WTO Panel Report, European Communities – Trade Description of Sardines, WT/DS231/R, 29 May 2002,” Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 29(3), 335–347.Google Scholar
Mathis, J. (2006). “Regional Trade Agreements and Domestic Regulation: What Reach for ‘Other Restrictive Regulations of Commerce’,” in Bartels, L. & Ortino, F. (Eds.), Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mattoo, A., & Subramanian, A. (1998). “Regulatory Autonomy and Multilateral Disciplines: The Dilemma and a Possible Resolution,” Journal of International Economic Law, 1, 303.Google Scholar
Mavroidis, P. C. (2007). Trade in Goods: The GATT and the Other Agreements Regulating Trade in Goods: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mavroidis, P. C. (2012). Trade in Goods: The GATT and the Other Agreements Regulating Trade in Goods (2nd ed.): Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mavroidis, P. C. (2013). “Driftin’ too Far from Shore–Why the Test for Compliance with the TBT Agreement Developed by the WTO Appellate Body Is Wrong, and What Should the AB Have Done Instead,” World Trade Review, 12(3), 509–531.Google Scholar
Mavroidis, P. C., Messerlin, P. A., & Wauters, J. (2008). The Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in the WTO: Edward Elgar Pub.Google Scholar
Mavroidis, P. C., & Saggi, K. (2014). “What Is Not So Cool about US–COOL Regulations? A Critical Analysis of the Appellate Body’s Ruling on US–COOL,” World Trade Review, 13(02), 299–320.Google Scholar
Mayeda, G. (2004). “Developing Disharmony? The SPS and TBT Agreements and the Impact of Harmonization on Developing Countries,” Journal of International Economic Law, 7(4), 737–764.Google Scholar
McCallum, J. (1995). “National Borders Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns,” The American Economic Review, 85(3), 615–623.Google Scholar
McCorquodale, R. (1994). “Self-Determination: A Human Rights Approach,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 43(4), 857–885.Google Scholar
McDonald, J. (2005). “Domestic Regulation, International Standards, and Technical Barriers to Trade,” World Trade Review, 4(2), 249–274.Google Scholar
McGrady, B. (2009). “Necessity Exceptions in WTO Law: Retreaded Tyres, Regulatory Purpose and Cumulative Regulatory Measures,” Journal of International Economic Law, 12(1), 153–173.Google Scholar
McGrew, T. (2011). “After Globalisation? WTO Reform and the New Global Political Economy,” in Cottier, T. & Elsig, M. (Eds.), Governing the World Trade Organization: Past, Present and Beyond Doha: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McIntyre, A. (2011). “Doctrine of Double Effect,” in Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011 ed.): Stanford University.Google Scholar
McMahan, J. (1997). “The Limits of National Partiality,” in McKim, R. and McMahan, J. (Eds.), The Morality of Nationalism: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2014). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (Updated edition.): Norton.Google Scholar
Meckled-Garcia, S. (2008). “On the Very Idea of Cosmopolitan Justice: Constructivism and International Agency,” Journal of Political Philosophy, 16(3), 245–271.Google Scholar
Meckled-Garcia, S. (2014). “Does the WTO Violate Human Rights (and Do I Help It)? Beyond the Metaphor of Culpability for Systemic Global Poverty,” Political Studies, 62(2), 435–451.Google Scholar
Messenger, G. (2013). Economic Analysis in WTO Law. Paper presented at the BIICL 13th Annual WTO Conference, London, 15 May 2013.Google Scholar
Messenger, G. (2016). The Development of World Trade Organization Law: Examining Change in International Law: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1989). On Liberty and Other Writings (Collini, S. ed.): Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (1999a). “Justice and Global Inequality,” in Hurrell, A. & Woods, N. (Eds.), Inequality, Globalization and World Politics: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2007). National Responsibility and Global Justice: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2009). “Justice and Boundaries,” Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 8(3), 291–309.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2010). “Why Immigration Controls Are Not Coercive: A Reply to Arash Abizadeh,” Political Theory, 38(1), 111–120.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2011). “On Nationality and Global Equality: A Reply to Holtug,” Ethics and Global Politics, 4(3), 165–171.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2012). “Territorial Rights: Concept and Justification,” Political Studies, 60(2), 252–268.Google Scholar
Miller, R. W. (2010). Globalizing Justice: The Ethics of Poverty and Power: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miscevic, N. (2010). “Nationalism,” in Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2010 ed.): Stanford University.Google Scholar
Moellendorf, D. (2005). “The World Trade Organization and Egalitarian Justice,” Metaphilosophy, 36(1–2), 145–162.Google Scholar
Moellendorf, D. (2013). “Fairness in Practice: A Social Contract for a Global Economy, by Aaron James,” Mind, 122(486), 548–553.Google Scholar
Moon, G. (2011). “Fair in Form, But Discriminatory in Operation – WTO Law’s Discriminatory Effects on Human Rights in Developing Countries,” Journal of International Economic Law, 14(3), 553–592.Google Scholar
Moore, M. (1998). National Self-Determination and Secession: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, M. (2012). “Natural Resources, Territorial Right, and Global Distributive Justice,” Political Theory, 40(1), 84–107.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, H. J., & Thompson, K. W. (1985). Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (6th ed.): McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mosoti, V. (2006). “Africa in the First Decade of WTO Dispute Settlement,” Journal of International Economic Law, 9(2), 427–453.Google Scholar
Moss, K. (2005). “The Consequences of the WTO Appellate Body Decision in EC-Tariff Preferences for the African Growth Opportunity Act and Sub-Saharan Africa,” New York University Journal of International Law & Politics, 38, 665.Google Scholar
Motaal, D. A. (2004). “The ‘Multilateral Scientific Consensus’ and the World Trade Organization,” Journal of World Trade, 38(5), 855–876.Google Scholar
Mueller, F. (2003). “Is the GATT Article XIX ‘Unforeseen Developments Clause’ Still Effective under the Agreement on Safeguards,” Journal of World Trade, 37(6), 1119–1151.Google Scholar
Muller, H. (2004). “Arguing, Bargaining and All That: Communicative Action, Rationalist Theory and the Logic of Appropriateness in International Relations,” European Journal of International Relations, 10(3), 395–435.Google Scholar
Murphy, L. B. (1998). “Institutions and the Demands of Justice,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 27(4), 251–291.Google Scholar
Musgrave, T. D. (1997). Self-Determination and National Minorities: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. (2005). “The Problem of Global Justice,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 33(2), 113–147.Google Scholar
Naiki, Y. (2009). “Accountability and Legitimacy in Global Health and Safety Governance: The World Trade Organization, the SPS Committee, and International Standard-Setting Organizations,” Journal of World Trade, 43(6), 1255–1279.Google Scholar
Nanz, P. (2006). “Democratic Legitimacy and Constitutionalisation of Transnational Trade Governance: A View from Political Theory,” in Joerges, C. & Petersmann, E.-U. (Eds.), Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation: Hart.Google Scholar
Narlikar, A. (2003). International Trade and Developing Countries: Bargaining Coalitions in GATT and WTO. Routledge.Google Scholar
Neumann, J., & Turk, E. (2003). “Necessity Revisited: Proportionality in World Trade Organization Law after Korea-Beef, EC-Asbestos and EC-Sardines,” Journal of World Trade, 37(1), 199.Google Scholar
Neven, D. J. (2001). “How Should ‘Protection’ Be Evaluated in Article III GATT Disputes?” European Journal of Political Economy, 17(2), 421–444.Google Scholar
Nickel, J. W. (2008). “Are Human Rights Mainly Implemented by Intervention?” in Martin, R. & Reidy, D. A. (Eds.), Rawls’s Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia?: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Niels, G. (2000). “What Is Antidumping Policy Really About?” Journal of Economic Surveys, 14(4), 467–492.Google Scholar
Nielsen, K. (1997). “Liberal Nationalism and Secession,” in Moore, M. (Ed.), National Self-Determination and Secession: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (2004). “Beyond the Social Contract: Capabilities and Global Justice,” Oxford Development Studies, 32(1), 3–18.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). “Perfectionist Liberalism and Political Liberalism,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 39(1), 3–45.Google Scholar
O’Neill, O. (1997). “Environmental Values, Anthropocentrism and Speciesism,” Environmental Values, 6(2), 127.Google Scholar
Odell, J. S. (2006). Negotiating Trade: Developing Countries in the WTO and NAFTA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Odell, J. S. (2010). “Negotiating from Weakness in International Trade Relations,” Journal of World Trade, 44(3), 545.Google Scholar
Odell, J. S., & Kell, S. K. (2006). “Reframing the Issue: The WTO Coalition on Intellectual Property and Public Health, 2001,” in Odell, J. S. (Ed.), Negotiating Trade: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oloka-Onyango, J. (1999). “Heretical Reflections on the Right to Self-Determination: Prospects and Problems for a Democratic Global Future in the New Millennium,” American University International Law Review, 15, 151.Google Scholar
Onyejekwe, K. (1994). “International Law of Trade Preferences: Emanations from the European Union and the United States,” St. Mary’s Law Journal, 26, 425.Google Scholar
Orford, A. (2013). “Moral Internationalism and the Responsibility to Protect,” European Journal of International Law, 24(1), 83–108.Google Scholar
Ormonde Driscoll, C. (2005). “Unforeseen Developments – An Unforeseeable Future? The Relationship between GATT Article XIX and the Agreement on Safeguards,” Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 32(3), 249–258.Google Scholar
Osiro, D. A. (2002). “GATT/WTO Necessity Analysis: Evolutionary Interpretation and Its Impact on the Authority of Domestic Regulation,” Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 29(2), 123–141.Google Scholar
Özden, Ç., & Reinhardt, E. (2005). “The Perversity of Preferences: GSP and Developing Country Trade Policies, 1976–2000,” Journal of Development Economics, 78(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
Page, S., & Hewitt, A. (2002). “The New European Trade Preferences: Does ‘Everything But Arms’(EBA) Help the Poor?” Development Policy Review, 20(1), 91–102.Google Scholar
Pal, R. (2014). “Has the Appellate Body’s Decision in Canada – Renewable Energy / Canada – Feed-in Tariff Program Opened the Door for Production Subsidies?” Journal of International Economic Law, 17(1), 125–137.Google Scholar
Paliwal, S. (2011). “Strengthening the Link in Linkage: Defining Development Needs in WTO Law,” American University International Law Review, 27, 37.Google Scholar
Panagariya, A. (2000). “Evaluating the Case for Export Subsidies,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2276.Google Scholar
Panagariya, A. (2002). “EU Preferential Trade Arrangements and Developing Countries,” World Economy, 25(10), 1415–1432.Google Scholar
Peel, J. (2010). Science and Risk Regulation in International Law: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peel, J. (2012). “Of Apples and Oranges (and Hormones in Beef): Science and the Standard of Review in WTO Disputes under the SPS Agreement,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 61(02), 427–458.Google Scholar
Perdikis, N., Shelburne, W. A. K., & Hobbs, J. E. (2001). “Reforming the WTO to Defuse Potential Trade Conflicts in Genetically Modified Goods,” The World Economy, 24(3), 379–398.Google Scholar
Perez, O. (2007). “Anomalies at the Precautionary Kingdom: Reflections on the GMO Panel’s Decision,” World Trade Review, 6(2), 265–280.Google Scholar
Petersmann, E.-U. (1992). “National Constitutions, Foreign Trade Policy and European Community Law,” European Journal of International Law, 3(1), 1–35.Google Scholar
Petersmann, E.-U. (2002). “Time for a United Nations ‘Global Compact’ for Integrating Human Rights into the Law of Worldwide Organizations: Lessons from European Integration,” European Journal of International Law, 13(3), 621–650.Google Scholar
Petersmann, E.-U. (2008a). “Constitutionalism and WTO Law: From a State-Centred Approach towards a Human Rights Approach in International Economic Law,” in Kennedy, D. L. M. & Southwick, J. D. (Eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Petersmann, E.-U. (2008b). “Human Rights, International Economic Law and ‘Constitutional Justice’,” European Journal of International Law, 19(4), 769–798.Google Scholar
Petersmann, E.-U. (2012). International Economic Law in the 21st Century: Constitutional Pluralism and Multilevel Governance of Interdependent Public Goods: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Philpott, D. (1998). “Self-Determination in Practice,” in Moore, M. (Ed.), National Self-Determination and Secession: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. W. (1994). “An Egalitarian Law of Peoples,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 23(3), 195–224.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. W. (1997). “The Bounds of Nationalism,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 26(Sup. 1), 463–504.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. W. (2000). “On the Site of Distributive Justice: Reflections on Cohen and Murphy,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 29(2), 137–169.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. W. (2002). World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms: Polity.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. W. (2011a). “Are We Violating the Human Rights of the World’s Poor,” Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal, 14, 1.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. W. (2011b). “The Role of International Law in Reproducing Massive Poverty,” in Besson, S. & Tasioulas, J. (Eds.), The Philosophy of International Law: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. (2001). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (1944) (2nd Beacon Paperback ed.): Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Porges, A., & Trachtman, J. P. (2003). “Robert Hudec and Domestic Regulation: The Resurrection of Aim and Effects,” Journal of World Trade, 37(4), 783–799.Google Scholar
Porter, D. L., & Bidlingmaier, R. (2013). “Targeted Dumping: The Next Frontier in Trade Remedy Litigation,” Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law, 21(2), 485.Google Scholar
Porter, T. (2009). “The Division of Moral Labour and the Basic Structure Restriction,” Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 8(2), 173–199.Google Scholar
Posner, E. A., & Sykes, A. O. (2011). “Efficient Breach of International Law: Optimal Remedies, Legalized Noncompliance, and Related Issues,” Michigan Law Review, 110, 243.Google Scholar
Posner, E. A., & Sykes, A. O. (2013). Economic Foundations of International Law: Belknap.Google Scholar
Posner, R. A. (1979). “Utilitarianism, Economics, and Legal Theory,” The Journal of Legal Studies, 8(1), 103–140.Google Scholar
Prebisch, R. (1964). Towards a New Trade Policy for Development: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.Google Scholar
Prevost, D. (2005). “‘Operationalising’ Special and Differential Treatment of Developing Countries under the SPS Agreement,” South African Yearbook of International Law, 30, 82–111.Google Scholar
Price, R. M. (Ed.). (2008). Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Primoratz, I. (2008). “Patriotism and Morality: Mapping the Terrain,” Journal of Moral Philosophy, 5(2), 204–226.Google Scholar
Prusa, T. J. (2005). “Anti-Dumping: A Growing Problem in International Trade,” World Economy, 28(5), 683–700.Google Scholar
Qin, J. Y. (2003). “‘WTO-Plus’ Obligations and Their Implications for the World Trade Organization Legal System,” Journal of World Trade, 37(3), 483–522.Google Scholar
Qin, J. Y. (2010). “The Challenge of Interpreting ‘WTO-PLUS’ Provisions,” Journal of World Trade, 44(1), 127–172.Google Scholar
Qin, J. Y. (2012). “Reforming WTO Discipline on Export Duties: Sovereignty over Natural Resources, Economic Development and Environmental Protection,” Journal of World Trade, 46(5), 1147–1190.Google Scholar
Quane, H. (1998). “The United Nations and the Evolving Right to Self-Determination,” The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 47(3), 537–572.Google Scholar
Quick, R., & Blüthner, A. (1999). “Has the Appellate Body Erred? An Appraisal and Criticism of the Ruling in the WTO Hormones Case,” Journal of International Economic Law, 2(4), 603–639.Google Scholar
Quinn, W. S. (1989). “Actions, Intentions, and Consequences: The Doctrine of Double Effect,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 18(4), 334–351.Google Scholar
Quintillhn, S. P. (1999). “Free Trade, Public Health Protection and Consumer Information in the European and WTO Context – Hormone-Treated Beef and Genetically Modified, Organisms,” Journal of World Trade, 33(6), 147–197.Google Scholar
Quong, J. (2007). “Contractualism, Reciprocity, and Egalitarian Justice,” Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 6(1), 75–105.Google Scholar
Rauscher, F. (2012). “Kant’s Social and Political Philosophy,” In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2012 ed.): Stanford University.Google Scholar
Raustiala, K. (2003). “Rethinking the Sovereignty Debate in International Economic Law,” Journal of International Economic Law, 6(4), 841–878.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1980). “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory,” The Journal of Philosophy, 77(9), 515–572.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1988). “The Priority of Right and Ideas of the Good,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 17(4), 251–276.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1999). The Law of Peoples: With, The Idea of Public Reason Revisited: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (Kelly, E. ed.): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (2006). “The Problem of Authority: Revisiting the Service Conception,” Minnesota Law Review, 90, 1003–1044.Google Scholar
Razavi, S. (2013). “Theory of Justice and Asymmetric Trade Liberalization: Limited Reciprocity as a Rule,” Manchester Journal of International Economic Law, 10, 108.Google Scholar
Regan, D. H. (2002). “Regulatory Purpose and ‘Like Products’ in Article III: 4 of the GATT (With Additional Remarks on Article II: 2),” Journal of World Trade, 36(3), 443–478.Google Scholar
Regan, D. H. (2003). “Further Thoughts on the Role of Regulatory Purpose under Article III of the GATT,” Journal of World Trade, 37(4), 737–760.Google Scholar
Regan, D. H. (2006). “What Are Trade Agreements For? Two Conflicting Stories Told by Economists, with a Lesson for Lawyers,” Journal of International Economic Law, 9(4), 951–988.Google Scholar
Regan, D. H. (2007). “The Meaning of ‘Necessary’ in GATT Article XX and GATS Article XIV: The Myth of Cost–Benefit Balancing,” World Trade Review, 6(3), 347–369.Google Scholar
Regan, D. H. (2009). “How to Think about PPMs (and Climate Change)” in Cottier, T., Nartova, O., & Bigdeli, S. Z. (Eds.), International Trade Regulation and the Mitigation of Climate Change: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Regan, D. H. (2014). “Explaining Trade Agreements: The Practitioners’ Story and the Standard Model,” World Trade Review, 14(3), 391–417.Google Scholar
Regan, D. H. (2015). “Explaining Trade Agreements: The Practitioner’s Story and the Standard Model” World Trade Review, 14(3), 391–417.Google Scholar
Reid, E. (2010). “Regulatory Autonomy in the EU and WTO: Defining and Defending Its Limits,” Journal of World Trade, 44(4), 877–901.Google Scholar
Reid, E. (2012). “Risk Assessment, Science and Deliberation: Managing Regulatory Diversity under the SPS Agreement?” European Journal of Risk Regulation, 3(4), 535.Google Scholar
Reidy, D. A. (2007). “A Just Global Economy: In Defense of Rawls,” The Journal of Ethics, 11(2), 193–236.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, C. (1999). The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rigod, B. (2013). “The Purpose of the WTO Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS),” European Journal of International Law, 24(2), 503–532.Google Scholar
Risse, M. (2006). “What to Say about the State,” Social Theory and Practice, 32(4), 671–698.Google Scholar
Risse, M. (2007). “Fairness in Trade I: Obligations from Trading and the Pauper-Labor Argument,” Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 6(3), 355–377.Google Scholar
Risse, M. and Wollner, G. (2014). “Three Images of Trade: On the Place of Trade in a Theory of Global Justice,” Moral Philosophy and Politics, 1(2), 201–225.Google Scholar
Risse, T. (2000). “‘Let’s Argue!’: Communicative Action in World Politics,” International Organization, 54(01), 1–39.Google Scholar
Roberts, D. (1998). “Preliminary Assessment of the Effects of the WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Trade Regulations,” Journal of International Economic Law, 1(3), 377–405.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, F., & Rodrik, D. (1999). “Trade Policy and Economic Growth: A Skeptic’s Guide to Cross-National Evidence,” in Bernanke, B. & Rogoff, K. S. (Eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000 (Vol. 15): MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (1995). “Political Economy of Trade Policy,” in Gene, M. G. & Kenneth, R. (Eds.), Handbook of International Economics (Vol. 3): Elsevier.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (1997). Has Globalization Gone Too Far?: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (2000). Trade Policy Reform as Institutional Reform: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (2001). The Global Governance of Trade as if Development Really Mattered: United Nations Development Programme Background Paper.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (2006). “Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion? A Review of the World Bank’s ‘Economic Growth in the 1990s: Learning from a Decade of Reform’,” Journal of Economic Literature, 44(4), 973–987.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (2011). The Globalization Paradox: Why Global Markets, States, and Democracy Can’t Coexist: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roessler, F. (1997). “Diverging Domestic Policies and Multilateral Trade Integration,” in Bhagwati, J. & Hudec, R. E. (Eds.), Fair Trade and Harmonization, Vol. 2: Legal Analysis: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rogowski, R. (2006). “Trade, Immigration and Cross-Border Investment,” in Weingast, B. R. & Wittman, D. A. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rolland, S. E. (2012). Development at the World Trade Organization (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ronzoni, M. (2009). “The Global Order: A Case of Background Injustice? A Practice-Dependent Account,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 37(3), 229–256.Google Scholar
Ronzoni, M. (2012). “Two Conceptions of State Sovereignty and Their Implications for Global Institutional Design,” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 15(5), 573–591.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. (1997). “The Social Contract” and Other Later Political Writings (Gourevitch, V. ed.): Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rubini, L. (2009). The Definition of Subsidy and State Aid: WTO and EC Law in Comparative Perspective: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rubini, L. (2012). “Ain’t Wastin’ Time No More: Subsidies for Renewable Energy, the SCM Agreement, Policy Space, and Law Reform,” Journal of International Economic Law, 15(2), 525–579.Google Scholar
Rubini, L. (2014). “‘The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.’ Lessons on Methodology in Legal Analysis from the Recent WTO Litigation on Renewable Energy Subsidies,” Journal of World Trade, 48(5), 895–938.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. G. (1982). “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order,” International Organization, 36(02), 379–415.Google Scholar
Saggi, K. (2010). “The Agreement on Safeguards: Does It Raise More Questions than It Answers?” in Bagwell, K., Bermann, G. A., & Mavroidis, P. C. (Eds.), Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in International Trade: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Salas, M., & Jackson, J. H. (2000). “Procedural Overview of the WTO EC – Banana Dispute,” Journal of International Economic Law, 3(1), 145–166.Google Scholar
Sangiovanni, A. (2007). “Global Justice, Reciprocity, and the State,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 35(1), 3–39.Google Scholar
Sangiovanni, A. (2008). “Justice and the Priority of Politics to Morality,” Journal of Political Philosophy, 16(2), 137–164.Google Scholar
Sangiovanni, A. (2011). “Global Justice and the Moral Arbitrariness of Birth,” Monist, 94(4), 571–583.Google Scholar
Sangiovanni, A. (2012). “The Irrelevance of Coercion, Imposition, and Framing to Distributive Justice,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 40(2), 79–110.Google Scholar
Sapir, A. (2001). “Who’s Afraid of Globalization? Domestic Adjustment in Europe and America,” in Porter, R. B., Sauve, P., Subramanian, A., & Zampetti, A. B. (Eds.), Efficiency, Equity, Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium: Harvard University Press/Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. (1972–1973). “Rawls’ Theory of Justice,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 121, 1020.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. (1998). What We Owe to Each Other: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schefer, K. N. (Ed.). (2013). Poverty and the International Economic Legal System: Duties to the World’s Poor: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scheffler, S. (1997). “Relationships and Responsibilities,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 26(3), 189–209.Google Scholar
Scheffler, S. (2001). Boundaries and Allegiances: Problems of Justice and Responsibility in Liberal Thought: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheuerman, W. E. (2006). “Critical Theory beyond Habermas,” in Dryzek, J. S., Honig, B., & Phillips, A. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, G., & Clements, B. (1999). “Government Subsidies,” Journal of Economic Surveys, 13(2), 119–148.Google Scholar
Scott, J. (2000). “On Kith and Kine (and Crustaceans): Trade and Environment in the EU and WTO,” in Weiler, J. H. H. (Ed.), The EU, The WTO and the NAFTA: Towards a Common Law of International Trade: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, J. (2002). “Intergrating Environmental Concerns in International Economic Law,” in Griller, S. (Ed.), International Economic Governance and Non Economic Concerns: Springer.Google Scholar
Scott, J. (2004a). “European Regulation of GMOs: Thinking about Judicial Review in the WTO,” Current Legal Problems, 57(1), 117–147.Google Scholar
Scott, J. (2004b). “International Trade and Environmental Governance: Relating Rules (and Standards) in the EU and the WTO,” European Journal of International Law, 15(2), 307–354.Google Scholar
Scott, J. (2007). The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1985). “The Moral Standing of the Market,” Social Philosophy and Policy, 2(2), 1–19.Google Scholar
Shadikhodjaev, S. (2014). “Renewable Energy and Government Support: Time to ‘Green’ the SCM Agreement?” World Trade Review, 14(3), 479–506.Google Scholar
Shaffer, G. (2008). “A Structural Theory of WTO Dispute Settlement: Why Institutional Choice Lies at the Center of the GMO Case,” New York University Journal of International Law & Politics, 41, 1.Google Scholar
Shaffer, G. (2010). “Risk, Science, and Law in the WTO: The Centrality of Institutional Choice,” American Society of International Law Proceedings of the Annual Meeting, 104, 19–23.Google Scholar
Shaffer, G. (2016). “Will the US Undermine the World Trade Organization?” Huffington Post/WorldPost (23 May 2016).Google Scholar
Shaffer, G., & Apea, Y. (2005). “Institutional Choice in the Generalized System of Preferences Case: Who Decides the Conditions for Trade Preferences? The Law and Politics of Rights,” Journal of World Trade, 39(6), 977–1008.Google Scholar
Shaffer, G., & Trachtman, J. P. (2011). “Interpretation and Institutional Choice at the WTO,” Virginia Journal of International Law, 52, 1.Google Scholar
Shapiro, H. S. (2007). “The Rules That Swallowed the Exceptions: The WTO SPS Agreement and Its Relationship to GATT Articles XX and XXI – The Threat of the EU-GMO Dispute” Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, 24, 199.Google Scholar
Sharp, B. (2010). “Responding Internationally to a Resource Crisis: Interpreting the GATT Article XX (j) Short Supply Exception,” Drake Journal of Agricultural Law, 15, 259.Google Scholar
Shue, H. (1996). Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy (2nd ed.): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Simmonds, N. E. (2008). Central Issues in Jurisprudence: Justice, Law and Rights (3rd ed.): Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. J. (1979). Moral Principles and Political Obligations: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, P. (1972). “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(3), 229–243.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C., & Williams, B. (1973). Utilitarianism: For and Against: London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Snidal, D. (1985). “The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory,” International Organization, 39(4), 579–614.Google Scholar
Spaulding, J. W. (2006). “Do International Fences Really Make Good Neighbors? The Zeroing Conflict between Antidumping Law and International Obligations,” New England Law Review, 41, 379.Google Scholar
Spence, M. (2001). “Which Intellectual Property Rights Are Trade Related?” in Francioni, F. (Ed.), Environment, Human Rights and International Trade: Hart.Google Scholar
Srinavasan, T. N. (2005). “Nondiscrimination in GATT/WTO: Was There Anything to Begin with and Is There Anything Left?” World Trade Review, 4(1), 69–95.Google Scholar
Staiger, R. W., & Sykes, A. O. (2010). “‘Currency Manipulation’ and World Trade,” World Trade Review, 9(4), 583–627.Google Scholar
Staiger, R. W., & Sykes, A. O. (2011). “International Trade, National Treatment, and Domestic Regulation,” The Journal of Legal Studies, 40(1), 149–203.Google Scholar
Staiger, R. W., & Tabellini, G. (1987). “Discretionary Trade Policy and Excessive Protection,” The American Economic Review, 77(5), 823–837.Google Scholar
Stamberger, J. L. (2003). “The Legality of Conditional Preferences to Developing Countries under the GATT Enabling Clause,” Chicago Journal of International Law, 4, 607.Google Scholar
Stegemann, K. (1991). “The International Regulation of Dumping: Protection Made Too Easy,” World Economy, 14(4), 375–405.Google Scholar
Steger, D. P. (2002). “Afterword: The ‘Trade and …’ Conundrum – A Commentary,” The American Journal of International Law, 96(1), 135–145.Google Scholar
Stein, A. A. (2008). “Neoliberal Institutionalism,” in Reus-Smit, C. & Snidal, D. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steinberg, R. H. (2009). “The Hidden World of WTO Governance: A Reply to Andrew Lang and Joanne Scott,” European Journal of International Law, 20(4), 1063–1071.Google Scholar
Stevens, C., Bird, K., Keane, J., Kennan, J., te Velde, D. W., & Higgins, K. (2011). The Poverty Impact of the Proposed Graduation Threshold in the Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) Trade Scheme: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Stewart, T. P., & Johanson, D. S. (1998). “The SPS Agreement of the World Trade Organization and International Organizations: The Roles of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, the International Plant Protection Convention, and the International Office of Epizootics,” Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, 26, 27.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E., & Charlton, A. (2005). Fair Trade for All: How Trade Can Promote Development: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Summers, J. (2013). “The Internal and External Aspects of Self-Determination Reconsidered,” in French, D. (Ed.), Statehood and Self-Determination: Reconciling Tradition and Modernity in International Law: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suttle, O. (2014a). “Book Review Essay: Poverty and Justice: Competing Lenses on International Economic Law,” The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 15(5–6), 1071–1086.Google Scholar
Suttle, O. (2014b). “Equality in Global Commerce: Towards a Political Theory of International Economic Law,” European Journal of International Law, 25(4) 1043–1070.Google Scholar
Suttle, O. (2016). “Debt, Default and Two Liberal Theories of Justice,” German Law Journal, 17(5), 799–834.Google Scholar
Suttle, O. (2017). “What Sorts of Things Are Public Morals? A Liberal Cosmopolitan Approach to Article XX GATT,” Modern Law Review 80(4) 569–599.Google Scholar
Switzer, S. (2008). “Environmental Protection and the Generalized System of Preferences: A Legal and Appropriate Linkage?” International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 57(1), 113–147.Google Scholar
Sykes, A. O. (1989). “Countervailing Duty Law: An Economic Perspective,” Columbia Law Review, 89(2), 199–263.Google Scholar
Sykes, A. O. (1991). “Protectionism as a ‘Safeguard’: A Positive Analysis of the GATT ‘Escape Clause’ with Normative Speculations,” The University of Chicago Law Review, 58(1) 255–305.Google Scholar
Sykes, A. O. (1999a). “The (limited) Role of Regulatory Harmonization in International Goods and Services Markets,” Journal of International Economic Law, 2(1), 49–70.Google Scholar
Sykes, A. O. (1999b). “Regulatory Protectionism and the Law of International Trade,” University of Chicago Law Review, 66(1), 1.Google Scholar
Sykes, A. O. (2000). “Regulatory Competition or Regulatory Harmonization? A Silly Question?” Journal of International Economic Law, 3(2), 257–264.Google Scholar
Sykes, A. O. (2002). “Domestic Regulation, Sovereignty, and Scientific Evidence Requirements: A Pessimistic View,” Chicago Journal of International Law, 3, 353.Google Scholar
Sykes, A. O. (2003a). “The Economics of WTO Rules on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures,” U Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper (No. 186).Google Scholar
Sykes, A. O. (2003b). “The Safeguards Mess: A Critique of WTO Jurisprudence,” World Trade Review, 2(3), 261–295.Google Scholar
Sykes, A. O. (2004). “The Persistent Puzzles of Safeguards: Lessons from the Steel Dispute,” Journal of International Economic Law, 7(3), 523–564.Google Scholar
Sykes, A. O. (2006a). “The Fundamental Deficiencies of the Agreement on Safeguards: A Reply to Professor Lee,” Journal of World Trade, 40(5), 979–996.Google Scholar
Sykes, A. O. (2006b). “International Trade and Human Rights: An Economic Perspective,” in Abbott, F. M., Breining-Kaufmann, C., & Cottier, T. (Eds.), International Trade and Human Rights: Foundations and Conceptual Issues: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sykes, A. O. (2010). “The Questionable Case for Subsidies Regulation: A Comparative Perspective,” Journal of Legal Analysis, 2(2), 473–523.Google Scholar
Tan, K.-C. (2000). Toleration, Diversity, and Global Justice: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Tan, K.-C. (2004). Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, and Patriotism: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tan, K.-C. (2012). Justice, Institutions and Luck: The Site, Ground and Scope of Equality: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tannenwald, N. (2007). The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Non-Use of Nuclear Weapons since 1945: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarullo, D. K. (2002). “The Hidden Costs of International Dispute Settlement: WTO Review of Domestic Anti-Dumping Decisions,” Law and Policy in International Business, 34, 109.Google Scholar
Tasioulas, J. (1996). “In Defence of Relative Normativity: Communitarian Values and the Nicaragua Case,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 16(1), 85–128.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. D. (1999). “Where’s the Beef–Mad Cows and the Blight of the SPS Agreement,” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 32, 487.Google Scholar
Trachtman, J. P. (1998). “Trade and … Problems, Cost-Benefit Analysis and Subsidiarity,” European Journal of International Law, 9(1), 32–85.Google Scholar
Trachtman, J. P. (2002). “Institutional Linkage: Transcending ‘Trade and …’,” The American Journal of International Law, 96(1), 77–93.Google Scholar
Trachtman, J. P. (2003). “Legal Aspects of a Poverty Agenda at the WTO: Trade Law and ‘Global Apartheid’,” Journal of International Economic Law, 6(1), 3–21.Google Scholar
Trachtman, J. P. (2006). “The Constitutions of the WTO,” European Journal of International Law, 17(3), 623–646.Google Scholar
Trachtman, J. P. (2007). “Regulatory Jurisdiction and the WTO,” Journal of International Economic Law, 10(3), 631–651.Google Scholar
Trachtman, J. P. (2008). The Economic Structure of International Law: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Trebilcock, M. J., & Howse, R. (1999). The Regulation of International Trade (2nd ed.): Routledge.Google Scholar
Trebilcock, M. J., & Howse, R. (2005). The Regulation of International Trade (3rd ed.): Routledge.Google Scholar
Trebilcock, M. J., Howse, R., & Eliason, A. (2013). The Regulation of International Trade (4th ed.): Routledge.Google Scholar
Trebilcock, M. J., & Soloway, J. (2002). “International Trade Policy and Domestic Food Safety Regulation: The Case for Substantial Deference by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body under the SPS Agreement,” in Kennedy, D. L. M. & Southwick, J. D. (Eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade: Essays in Honor of Robert Hudec: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trombetta, M. J. (2008). “Environmental Security and Climate Change: Analysing the Discourse,” Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 21(4), 585–602.Google Scholar
Turksen, U. (2009). “The WTO Law and the EC’S GSP+ Arrangement,” Journal of World Trade, 43(5), 927–968.Google Scholar
Tyagi, M. (2012). “Flesh on a Legal Fiction: Early Practice in the WTO on Accession Protocols,” Journal of International Economic Law, 15(2), 391–441.Google Scholar
Valentini, L. (2011a). “Coercion and (Global) Justice,” American Political Science Review, 105(01), 205–220.Google Scholar
Valentini, L. (2011b). “Global Justice and Practice-Dependence: Conventionalism, Institutionalism, Functionalism,” Journal of Political Philosophy, 19(4), 399–418.Google Scholar
Valentini, L. (2011c). Justice in a Globalized World: A Normative Framework: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van den Bossche, P. & Zdouc, W. (2013). The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization: Text, Cases and Materials (3rd ed.): Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Parijs, P. (2003). “Difference Principles,” in Freeman, S. R. (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Verhoosel, G. (2002). National Treatment and WTO Dispute Settlement: Adjudicating the Boundaries of Regulatory Autonomy: Hart.Google Scholar
Victor, D. G. (1999). “The Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement of the World Trade Organization: An Assessment after Five Years,” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 32, 865.Google Scholar
Voon, T. (2007). “The End of Zeroing? Reflections Following the WTO Appellate Body’s Latest Missive,” Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 34(3), 211–230.Google Scholar
Voon, T. (2010). “Eliminating Trade Remedies from the WTO: Lessons from Regional Trade Agreements,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 59(03), 625–667.Google Scholar
Waincymer, J. (2009). “The Trade and Human Rights Debate: Introduction to an Interdisciplinary Analysis,” in Joseph, S., Kinley, D., & Waincymer, J. (Eds.), The World Trade Organization and Human Rights: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (2006). “The Rule of International Law,” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 30(1), 15–30.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (1987). “Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism,” The Philosophical Quarterly, 37(147), 127–150.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (2004). “Property and Ownership,” in Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2012 ed.): Stanford University.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (2010). “Two Conceptions of Self-Determination,” in Besson, S. & Tasioulas, J. (Eds.), The Philosophy of International Law: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. (1994). Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Wauters, J. (2010). “The Safeguards Agreement: An Overview,” in Bagwell, K., Bermann, G. A., & Mavroidis, P. C. (Eds.), Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in International Trade: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H. (2009). “Brazil – Measures Affecting Imports of Retreaded Tyres (DS322),” World Trade Review, 8(Special Issue 01), 137–144.Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H., & Neven, D. J. (2005). “One Bad Apple? A Comment on Japan – Measures Affecting the Importation of Apples,” in Horn, H. & Mavroidis, P. C. (Eds.), The WTO Case Law of 2003: The American Law Institute Reporters’ Studies: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wenar, L. (2006). “Why Rawls Is Not a Cosmopolitan Egalitarian,” in Martin, R. & Reidy, D. A. (Eds.), Rawls’s Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia?: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Wenar, L. (2008). “Property Rights and the Resource Curse,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 36(1), 2–32.Google Scholar
Wenar, L. (2011). “Clean Trade in Natural Resources,” Ethics & International Affairs, 25(1), 27–39.Google Scholar
Wendt, A. (1992). “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics,” International Organization, 46(2), 391–425.Google Scholar
Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wight, M. (1996). International Theory: The Three Traditions (Wight, G. and Porter, B. eds.): Leicester University Press for the Royal Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
Wijkström, E., & McDaniels, D. (2013). “Improving Regulatory Governance: International Standards and the WTO TBT Agreement,” Journal of World Trade, 47(5), 1013.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R., & Scott, J. (2008). “Developing Country Participation in the GATT: A Reassessment,” World Trade Review, 7(3), 473–510.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (2005). In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Winickoff, D. E., & Bushey, D. M. (2010). “Science and Power in Global Food Regulation: The Rise of the Codex Alimentarius,” Science, Technology & Human Values, 35(3), 356–381.Google Scholar
Wohlforth, W. C. (2008). “Realism,” in Reus-Smit, C. & Snidal, D. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. (2015). World Bank Development Indicators Database, http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicatorsGoogle Scholar
World Bank. (2016). World Bank International Comparison Program Database. www.worldbank.org/en/programs/icpGoogle Scholar
World Trade Organization. (2007). WTO Analytical Index: Guide to WTO Law and Practice (2nd ed.): Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization. (2012b). WTO Analytical Index: Guide to WTO Law and Practice (3rd ed.): Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization, International Trade Centre, & United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2012). World Tariff Profiles.Google Scholar
Wouters, J., & Coppens, D. (2009). “An Overview of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures,” in Bagwell, K., Bermann, G. A., & Mavroidis, P. C. (Eds.), Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in International Trade: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wren, A. (2006). “Comparative Perspectives on the Role of the State in the Economy,” in Weingast, B. R. & Wittman, D. A. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, J. (1999). “Minority Groups, Autonomy, and Self-Determination,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 19(4), 605–629.Google Scholar
Wu, M. (2008). “Free Trade and the Protection of Public Morals: An Analysis of the Newly Emerging Public Morals Clause Doctrine,” Yale Journal of International Law, 33, 215.Google Scholar
Zampetti, A. B. (2001). “A Rough Map of Challenges to the Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium,” in Porter, R. B., Sauve, P., Subramanian, A., & Zampetti, A. B. (Eds.), Efficiency, Equity and Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Zampetti, A. B. (2006). Fairness in the World Economy: US Perspectives on International Trade Relations: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Zanardi, M. (2004). “Anti-Dumping: What Are the Numbers to Discuss at Doha?” World Economy, 27(3), 403–433.Google Scholar
Zheng, W. (2012). “Reforming Trade Remedies,” Michigan Journal of International Law, 34, 151–207.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D. (1981). “Coercive Wage Offers,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 10(2), 121–145.Google Scholar