Abbott, Kenneth W., ‘Strengthening the Transnational Regime Complex for Climate Change’ (2014) 3(1) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 57–88.Google Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth W. & Snidal, Duncan, ‘Hard and Soft Law in International Governance’ (2000) 54(3) International Organization, pp. 421–456.Google Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth W. & Snidal, Duncan, ‘Strengthening International Regulation through Transnational New Governance: Overcoming the Orchestration Deficit’ (2009) 42 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, pp. 501–578.Google Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth W. & Snidal, Duncan, ‘Taking Responsive Regulation Transnational: Strategies for International Organizations’ (2013) 7(1) Regulation & Governance, pp. 95–113.Google Scholar

Abramowicz, Michael & Colby, Thomas B., ‘Notice and Comment Judicial Decision Making’ (2009) 76(3) University of Chicago Law Review, pp. 965–1036.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce A. & Stewart, Richard B., ‘Reforming Environmental Law’ (1985) 37(5) Stanford Law Review, pp. 1333–1365.Google Scholar

Adelman, Sam, ‘Human Rights in the Paris Agreement: Too Little, Too Late?’ (2018) 7(1) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 17–36.Google Scholar

Affolder, Natasha, ‘Transnational Conservation Contracts’ (2012) 25(2) Leiden Journal of International Law, pp. 443–460.Google Scholar

Affolder, Natasha, ‘Transnational Conservation Contracts: A Primer’ (2012) 106 Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), pp. 508–511.Google Scholar

Affolder, Natasha, ‘Looking for Law in Unusual Places: Cross-Border Diffusion of Environmental Norms’ (2018) Transnational Environmental Law, 1–25.doi:10.1017/S2047102518000080.Google Scholar

Albareda, Laura, ‘Corporate Responsibility, Governance and Accountability: From Self‐Regulation to Co‐Regulation’ (2008) 8(4) Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, pp. 430–439.Google Scholar

Alemanno, Alberto, “The Shaping of European Risk Regulation by Community Courts”, Jean Monnet Working Paper No. 18 (2008), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1325770.Google Scholar

Alford, John, ‘The Multiple Facets of Co-Production: Building on the Work of Elinor Ostrom’ (2014) 16(3) Public Management Review, pp. 299–316.Google Scholar

Alm, Alvin L., ‘A Need for New Approaches. Command-and-Control Is No Longer a Cure All’ (1992) 18(2) EPA Journal, pp. 7–11.Google Scholar

Anderson, Christopher, ‘Contrasting Models of EU Administration in Judicial Review of Risk Regulation’ (2014) 51(2) Common Market Law Review, pp. 425–454.Google Scholar

Andonova, Liliana, Betsill, Michele & Bulkeley, Harriet, ‘Transnational Climate Governance’ (2009) 9(2) Global Environmental Politics, pp. 52–73.Google Scholar

Anton, Don & Shelton, Dinah, Environmental Protection and Human Rights (2011, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Armeni, Chiara, ‘Global Experimentalist Governance, International Law and Climate Change Technologies’ (2015) 64(4) International & Comparative Law Quarterly, pp. 875–904.Google Scholar

Arnold, Denis G., ‘Corporations and Human Rights Obligations’ (2016) 1(2) Business and Human Rights Journal, pp. 255–275.Google Scholar

Arup, Christopher & Zhang, Hao, ‘Lessons from Regulating Carbon Offset Markets’ (2015) 4(1) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 69–100.Google Scholar

Auld, Graeme & Gulbrandsen, Lars H., ‘Certification Schemes and the Impacts on Forests and Forestry’ (2008) 33 Annual Review of Environment and Resources, pp. 187–211.Google Scholar

Auld, Graeme & Gulbrandsen, Lars H., ‘Transparency in Non-State Certification: Consequences for Accountability and Legitimacy’ (2010) 10(3) Global Environmental Politics, pp. 97–119.Google Scholar

Ayres, Ian & Braithwaite, John, Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate (1992, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Bäckstrand, Karin, ‘Accountability of Networked Climate Governance: The Rise of Transnational Climate Partnerships’ (2008) 8(3) Global Environmental Politics, pp. 74–102.Google Scholar

Baker, Betsy & Yeager, Brooks, ‘Coordinated Ocean Stewardship in the Arctic: Needs, Challenges and Possible Models for an Arctic Ocean Coordinating Agreement’ (2015) 4(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 359–394.Google Scholar

Baldwin, Robert, ‘Why Rules Don’t Work’ (1990) 53(3) The Modern Law Review, pp. 321–337.Google Scholar

Baldwin, Robert, ‘Regulation: After Command and Control’ in Hawkins, Keith (ed.), The Human Face of Law (1997, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Baldwin, Robert, ‘Regulation Lite: The Rise of Emissions Trading’ (2008) 2(2) Regulation & Governance, pp. 193–215.Google Scholar

Baldwin, Robert & Black, Julia, ‘Really Responsive Regulation’ (2008) 71(1) The Modern Law Review, pp. 59–94.Google Scholar

Baldwin, Robert, Black, Julia & O’Leary, Gerard, ‘Risk Regulation and Transnationality: Institutional Accountability as a Driver of Innovation’ (2014) 3(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 373–390.Google Scholar

Baldwin, Robert, Cave, Martin & Lodge, Martin, Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice, 2nd edn. (2012, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Bansard, Jennifer, Pattberg, Philipp & Widerberg, Oscar, ‘Subnational Climate Networks, Who They Are and What They Do’, paper presented at the 2014 Amsterdam Conference Beyond 2015: Exploring the Future of Global Climate Governance, available at www.indiaeu-climategovernance.org/Reports/Subnational-networks_Bansard.pdf.Google Scholar

Barral, Virginie, ‘Sustainable Development in International Law: Nature and Operation of an Evolutive Legal Norm’ (2012) 23(2) European Journal of International Law, pp. 377–400.Google Scholar

Barrett, Scott, ‘The Political Economy of the Kyoto Protocol’ (1998) 14(4) Oxford Review of Economic Policy, pp. 20–39.Google Scholar

Bartley, Tim, ‘Certifying Forests and Factories: States, Social Movements, and the Rise of Private Regulation in the Apparel and Forest Products Fields’ (2003) 31(3) Politics and Society, pp. 433–464.Google Scholar

Bell, Stuart, McGillivray, Donald & Pedersen, Ole W., Environmental Law, 8th edn. (2013, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal, ‘The Future of International Law Scholarship in Germany: The Tension between Interpretation and Change’ (2007) 67 ZaöRV, pp. 585–598.Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal, ‘The Conception of Law as a Legal System’ (2008) Tel Aviv University Law School Faculty Papers 83.Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal, The Law of Global Governance (2014, Hague Academy of International Law).Google Scholar

Berger, Klaus Peter, The Creeping Codification of the New Lex Mercatoria, 2nd edn. (2010, Center for Transnational Law).Google Scholar

Berman, Paul Schiff, Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law beyond Borders (2014, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Bethlehem, Daniel, ‘The End of Geography: The Changing Nature of the International System and the Challenge to International Law’ (2014) 25(1) European Journal of International Law, pp. 9–24.Google Scholar

Betsill, Michele & Bulkeley, Harriet, ‘Transnational Networks and Global Environmental Governance: The Cities for Climate Protection Program’ (2004) 48(2) International Studies Quarterly, pp. 471–493.Google Scholar

Betsill, Michele & Bulkeley, Harriet, ‘Cities and the Multilevel Governance of Global Climate Change’ (2006) 12(2) Global Governance, pp. 141–159.Google Scholar

Beyerlin, Ulrich & Marauhn, Thilo, International Environmental Law (2011, Hart Publishing).Google Scholar

Biermann, Frank & Pattberg, Philipp, Global Environmental Governance Reconsidered (2012, MIT Press).Google Scholar

Black, Celeste M., ‘Taxation of Cross-Border Transfers of Carbon Emission Allowances under Linked Emissions Trading Schemes’ (2017) 6(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 335–361.Google Scholar

Black, Julia, ‘“Which Arrow?”: Rule Type and Regulatory Policy’ (1995) Public Law, pp. 94–117.Google Scholar

Black, Julia, ‘Constitutionalising Self-Regulation’ (1996) 59(1) The Modern Law Review, pp. 24–55.Google Scholar

Black, Julia, ‘Critical Reflections on Regulation’ (2002) 27(1) Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar

Black, Julia, ‘Constructing and Contesting Legitimacy and Accountability in Polycentric Regulatory Regimes’ (2008) 2(2) Regulation & Governance, pp. 137–164.Google Scholar

Black, Julia, ‘Forms and Paradoxes of Principles-Based Regulation’ (2008) 3(4) Capital Markets Law Journal, pp. 425–457.Google Scholar

Black, Julia, ‘The Role of Risk in Regulatory Processes’ in Baldwin, Robert, Cave, Martin & Lodge, Martin (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Regulation (2010, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Black, Julia, Lodge, Martin & Thatcher, Mark, Regulatory Innovation: A Comparative Analysis (2005, Edward Elgar).Google Scholar

Bleicher, Samuel, ‘An Overview of International Environmental Regulation’ (1972) 2(1) Ecology Law Quarterly, pp. 1–90.Google Scholar

Bodansky, Daniel, ‘Is There an International Environmental Constitution?’ (2009) 16(2) Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, pp. 565–584.Google Scholar

Bodansky, Daniel, The Art and Craft of International Environmental Law (2010, Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Bodansky, Daniel & Lawrence, Jessica C., ‘Trade and Environment’, in Bethlehem, Daniel, Van Damme, Isabelle, McRae, Donald & Neufeld, Rodney (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Trade Law (2009, Oxford Universiy Press).Google Scholar

Bogojević, Sanja, ‘Ending the Honeymoon: Deconstructing Emissions Trading Discourses’ (2009) 21(3) Journal of Environmental Law, pp. 443–468.Google Scholar

Bomhoff, Jacco & Meuwese, Anne, ‘The Meta-Regulation of Transnational Private Regulation’ (2011) 38(1) Journal of Law and Society, pp. 138–162.Google Scholar

Börzel, Tanja A. & Risse, Thomas, ‘Governance without a State: Can It Work?’ (2010) 4(1) Regulation & Governance, pp. 113–134.Google Scholar

Bosselmann, Klaus, The Principle of Sustainability: Transforming Law and Governance, 2nd edn. (2016, Routledge).Google Scholar

Braithwaite, John & Drahos, Peter, Global Business Regulation (2000, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Branger, Frédéric, Lecuyer, Oskar & Quirion, Philip, ‘The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: Should We Throw the Flagship out with the Bathwater?’ (2015) 6(1) WIREs Climate Change, pp. 9–16.Google Scholar

Brütsch, Christian & Lehmkuhl, Dirk (eds.), Law and Legalization in Transnational Relations (2007, Routledge).Google Scholar

Brütsch, Christian & Lehmkuhl, Dirk, ‘Complex Legalization and the Many Moves to Law’, in Brütsch, & Lehmkuhl, (eds.), Law and Legalization in Transnational Relations (2007, Routledge).Google Scholar

Cadbury, Adrian, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility’ (2006) 1(1) Twenty-First Century Society: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, pp. 5–21.Google Scholar

Cadman, Timothy, Eastwood, Lauren, Michaelis, Federico Lopez-Casero, Maraseni, Tek Narayan, Pittock, Jamie & Sarker, Tapan (eds.), The Political Economy of Sustainable Development: Policy Instruments and Market Mechanisms (2015, Edward Elgar).Google Scholar

Cafaggi, Fabrizio, ‘New Foundations of Transnational Private Regulation’ (2001) 38(1) Journal of Law and Society, pp. 20–49.Google Scholar

Cafaggi, Fabrizio, ‘Enforcing Transnational Private Regulation: Models and Patterns’ in Cafaggi, Fabrizio (ed.), Enforcement of Transnational Regulation: Ensuring Compliance in a Global World (2012, Edward Elgar), pp. 75–130.Google Scholar

Cafaggi, Fabrizio, ‘Transnational Private Regulation and the Production of Global Public Goods and Private “Bads”’ (2012) 23(3) European Journal of International Law, pp. 695–717.Google Scholar

Cafaggi, Fabrizio, (ed.), Enforcement of Transnational Regulation: Ensuring Compliance in a Global World (2012, Edward Elgar).Google Scholar

Calliess, Gralf-Peter & Renner, Moritz, ‘Between Law and Social Norms: The Evolution of Global Governance’ (2009) 22(2) Ratio Juris, pp. 260–280.Google Scholar

Calliess, Gralf-Peter & Zumbansen, Peer, Rough Consensus and Running Code: A Theory of Transnational Private Law (2010, Bloomsbury Publishing).Google Scholar

Campbell, Denis & Mason, Rowena, ‘Jeremy Hunt Ditches Four-Hour Target as A&E Crisis Deepens’ 9 Jan. 2017, The Guardian, available at www.theguardian.com/society/2017/jan/09/labour-party-jeremy-hunt-nhs-waiting-time.Google Scholar

Carlarne, Cinnamon, Climate Change Law and Policy: EU and US Approaches (2010, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Carothers, Claire, ‘United We Stand: The Interstate Compact as a Tool for Effecting Climate Change’ (2006) 41(1) Georgia Law Review, pp. 229–260.Google Scholar

Cashore, Benjamin, ‘Legitimacy and the Privatization of Environmental Governance: How Non–State Market–Driven (NSMD) Governance Systems Gain Rule–Making Authority’ (2002) 15(4) Governance, pp. 503–529.Google Scholar

Casini, Lorenzo, ‘Down the Rabbit-Hole: The Projection of the Public/Private Distinction beyond the State’ (2014) 12(2) International Journal of Constitutional Law, pp. 402–428.Google Scholar

Casini, Lorenzo, ‘Beyond Drip-Painting? Ten Years of GAL and the Emergence of a Global Administration’ (2015) 13(2) International Journal of Constitutional Law, pp. 473–477.Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, ‘States: Rise and Decline of the Primary Subjects of the International Community’ in Fassbender, Bardo & Peters, Anne, The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law (2012, Oxford University Press), pp. 49–70.Google Scholar

Cassese, Sabino, ‘Administrative Law without the State? The Challenge of Global Regulation’ (2005) 37 NYU Journal of International Law & Politics, pp. 663–694.Google Scholar

Castells, Manuel, The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age, 2nd edn. (2010, Wiley Blackwell).Google Scholar

Castro, Paula, ‘Common but Differentiated Responsibilities beyond the Nation State: How Is Differential Treatment Addressed in Transnational Climate Governance Initiatives?’ (2016) 5(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 379–400.Google Scholar

Čavoški, Aleksandra, ‘Assessment of Compliance Strategies’ (2016) European Law Review, pp. 254–261.Google Scholar

Chalmers, Damian, Davies, Gareth & Monti, Giorgio, European Union Law, 3rd edn. (2014, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Chayes, Abram & Handler Chayes, Antonia, ‘Compliance without Enforcement: State Behavior under Regulatory Treaties’ (1991) 7(3) Negotiation Journal, pp. 311–330.Google Scholar

Cheit, Ross E., Setting Safety Standards: Regulation in the Public and Private Sectors (1990, University of California Press).Google Scholar

Cheremisinoff, Nicholas, Rosenfield, Paul & Davletshin, Anton, Responsible Care: A New Strategy for Pollution Prevention and Waste Reduction Through Environment (2008, Burlington: Elsevier Science).Google Scholar

Chircop, Aldo et al., ‘Governance of Marine Protected Areas in East Africa: A Comparative Study of Mozambique, South Africa, and Tanzania’ (2010) 41(1) Ocean Development & International Law, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar

Chiti, Eduardo, ‘Where Does GAL Find Its Legal Grounding?’ (2015) 13(2) International Journal of Constitutional Law, pp. 486–491.Google Scholar

Christoforou, Theofanis, ‘The Precautionary Principle and Democratizing Expertise: A European Legal Perspective’ (2003) 33(1) Science and Public Policy, pp. 205–211.Google Scholar

Churchill, Robin R. & Ulfstein, Geir, ‘Autonomous Institutional Arrangements in Multilateral Environmental Agreements: A Little-Noticed Phenomenon in International Law’ (2000) 94(4) American Journal of International Law, pp. 623–659.Google Scholar

Coase, Ronald H., ‘The Problem of Social Cost’ (1960) 3(1) The Journal of Law & Economics, pp. 1–44.Google Scholar

Coglianese, Cary, ‘Is Consensus an Appropriate Basis for Regulatory Policy?’ in Orts, Eric W. & Deketelaere, Kurt (eds.), Environmental Contracts: Comparative Approaches to Regulatory Innovation in the United States and Europe (2001, Kluwer Law International).Google Scholar

Coglianese, Cary, ‘Citizen Participation in Rulemaking: Past, Present and Future’ (2006) 55 Duke Law Journal, pp. 943–968.Google Scholar

Coglianese, Cary, (ed.), Achieving Regulatory Excellence (2017, Brookings Institution Press).Google Scholar

Coglianese, Cary & Mendelson, Evan, ‘Meta-Regulation and Self-Regulation’ in Baldwin, Robert, Cave, Martin & Lodge, Martin (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Regulation (2010, Oxford University Press), pp. 146–168.Google Scholar

Cohen, Michael D., March, James G. & Olsen, Johan P., ‘A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice’ (1972) 17(1) Administrative Science Quarterly, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar

Cole, Daniel H. & Grossman, Peter Z., ‘When Is Command-and-Control Efficient? Institutions, Technology, and the Comparative Efficiency of Alternative Regulatory Regimes for Environmental Protection’ (1999) Wisconsin Law Review, pp. 887–983.Google Scholar

Cotterrell, Roger, ‘What Is Transnational Law’ (2012) 37(2) Law & Social Inquiry, pp. 500–524.Google Scholar

Craig, Paul, EU Administrative Law, 2nd edn. (2013, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Croci, Eduardo (ed.), The Handbook of Environmental Voluntary Agreements (2005, Springer).Google Scholar

Cross, Frank B., ‘Paradoxical Perils of the Precautionary Principle’ (1995) 53(3) Washington and Lee Law Review, pp. 851–928.Google Scholar

CSBT Commission, Report of the Fifteenth Meeting of the Scientific Committee, 11 Sept. 2010 (Narita, Japan), available at www.ccsbt.org/userfiles/file/docs_english/meetings/meeting_reports/ccsbt_17/report_of_SC15.pdf.Google Scholar

Curtin, Deirdre, ‘Holding (Quasi-)Autonomous EU Administrative Actors to Public Account’ (2007) 13(4) European Law Journal, pp. 523–541.Google Scholar

Daily, Gretchen C., Polasky, Stephen, Goldstein, Joshua, Kareiva, Peter M., Mooney, Harold A., Pejchar, Liba, Ricketts, Taylor H., Salzman, James & Shallenberger, Robert, ‘Ecosystem Services in Decision Making: Time to Deliver’ (2009) 7 Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, pp. 21–28.Google Scholar

Dashwood, Hevina S., ‘Canadian Mining Companies and Corporate Social Responsibility: Weighing the Impact of Global Norms’ (2007) 40(1) Canadian Journal of Political Science, pp. 129–156.Google Scholar

d’Aspremont, Jean & Aalberts, Tanja (eds.), ‘Symposium on Soft Law’ (2012) 25(2) Leiden Journal of International Law, pp. 309–378.Google Scholar

De Sadeleer, Nicolas, EU Environmental Law and the Internal Market (2014, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

De Schutter, Olivier, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility European Style’ (2008) 14(2) European Law Journal, pp. 203–236.Google Scholar

Deakin, Simon & Hobbs, Richard, ‘False Dawn for CSR? Shifts in Regulatory Policy and the Response of the Corporate and Financial Sectors in Britain’ (2007) 15(1) Corporate Governance: An International Review, pp. 68–76.Google Scholar

de Búrca, Gráinne, ‘The Principle of Proportionality and Its Application in EC Law’ (1993) 13(1) Yearbook of European Law, pp. 105–150.Google Scholar

deLeon, Peter, ‘The Stages Approach to the Policy Process: What Has It Done? Where Is It Going?’ in Sabatier, Paul A. (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (1999, Westview Press).Google Scholar

Delimatsis, Panagiotis, The Law, Economics and Politics of International Standardisation (2015, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Delmas-Marty, Mireille, Ordering Pluralism: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding the Transnational Legal World, translated by Naomi Norberg (2009, Hart Publishing).Google Scholar

Dernbach, John & Cheever, Federico, ‘Sustainable Development and Its Discontents’ (2015) 4(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 247–287.Google Scholar

Desgagné, Richard, ‘Integrating Environmental Values into the European Convention on Human Rights’ (1995) 89(2) American Journal of International Law, pp. 263–294.Google Scholar

Dilling, Olaf, ‘Legitimacy Collisions in 3D: Some Queries with the Third Dimension of Joerges’ Conflicts Law’ in Joerges, Christian & Ralli, Tommi (eds.), After Globalisation: New Patterns of Conflict and Their Sociological and Legal Reconstructions (2011, RECON Report Series).Google Scholar

Dimitrov, Radoslav S., ‘International Coral Reef Initiative’ in Hale, Thomas & Held, David (eds.), Handbook of Transnational Governance: Institutions & Innovations (2011, Polity Press), pp. 182–189.Google Scholar

Domingo, Rafael, The New Global Law (2010, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Drew, Jacqueline M. & Drew, Michael E., ‘Establishing Additionality: Fraud Vulnerabilities in the Clean Development Mechanism’ (2010) 23(3) Accounting Research Journal, pp. 243–253.Google Scholar

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, ‘Formation of Customary International Law and General Principles’ in Bodansky, Daniel, Brunnée, Jutta & Hey, Ellen (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (2008, Oxford University Press), pp. 450–465.Google Scholar

Ebeling, Johannes, ‘Risks and Criticisms of Forestry-Based Climate Change Mitigation and Carbon Trading’ in Streck, Charlotte et al. (eds.), Climate Change and Forests: Emerging Policy and Market Opportunities (2008, Chatham House).Google Scholar

Eberlein, Burkhard, Abbott, Kenneth W., Black, Julia, Meidinger, Errol & Wood, Stepan, ‘Transnational Business Governance Interactions: Conceptualization and Framework for Analysis’ (2014) 8(1) Regulation & Governance, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar

Eberlein, Burkard & Grande, Edgar, ‘Beyond Delegation: Transnational Regulatory Regimes and the EU Regulatory State’ (2005) 12(1) Journal of European Public Policy, pp. 89–112.Google Scholar

Egede, Edwin, ‘Common Heritage of Mankind’, Oxford Index on International Law, see http://oxfordindex.oup.com/view/10.1093/obo/9780199796953–0109.Google Scholar

Eisner, Marc Allen, ‘Private Environmental Governance in Hard Times: Markets for Virtue and the Dynamics of Regulatory Change’ (2011) 12(2) Theoretical Inquiries in Law, pp. 489–515.Google Scholar

Ekins, Paul & Barker, Terry, ‘Carbon Taxes and Carbon Emissions Trading’ (2002) 15(3) Journal of Economic Surveys, pp. 326–376.Google Scholar

Ellinas, Antonis A. & Suleiman, Ezra N., ‘Supranationalism in a Transnational Bureaucracy: The Case of the European Commission’ (2011) 49(5) Journal of Common Market Studies, pp. 923–947.Google Scholar

Eriksen, Erik Oddvar & Erik Fossum, John (eds.), Democracy in the European Union. Integration through Deliberation (Routledge, 2002).Google Scholar

Esty, Daniel C. & Geradin, Damien, ‘Market Access, Competitiveness, and Harmonization: Environmental Protection in Regional Trade Agreements’ (1997) 21(2) Harvard Environmental Law Review, pp. 265–336.Google Scholar

Esty, Daniel C. & Geradin, Damien, Regulatory Competition and Economic Integration: Comparative Perspectives (2001, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Falkner, Robert, ‘The Paris Agreement and the New Logic of International Climate Politics’ (2016) 92(5) International Affairs, pp. 1107–1125.Google Scholar

Farag, Mohamed, ‘Three Companies Win in First Phase of Solar Feed-In Tariff Project’ 27 Feb. 2017, Daily News Egypt, available at https://dailynewsegypt.com/2017/02/27/three-companies-win-first-phase-solar-feed-tariff-project/.Google Scholar

Ferraro, Paul J., ‘Global Habitat Protection: Limitations of Development Interventions and a Role for Conservation Performance Payments’ (2001) 15(4) Conservation Biology, pp. 990–1000.Google Scholar

Few, Roger, Brown, Katrina & Tomkins, Emma L., ‘Public Participation and Climate Change Adaptation: Avoiding the Illusion of Inclusion’ (2007) 7(1) Climate Policy, pp. 46–59.Google Scholar

Finnis, John, Natural Law and Natural Rights, 2nd edn. (2011, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Fiorino, Daniel J., ‘Regulatory Negotiation as a Policy Process’ (1988) 48(4) Public Administration Review, pp. 764–772.Google Scholar

Fisher, Elizabeth, Lange, Bettina & Scotford, Eloise, Environmental Law: Text, Cases and Materials (2013, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Fleurke, Floor, ‘What Use for Article 95(5) EC? An Analysis of Land Oberosterreich and Austria v Commission’ (2008) 20(2) Journal of Environmental Law, pp. 267–278.Google Scholar

Flinders, Matthew & Buller, Jim, ‘Depoliticization, Democracy and Arena Shifting’ in Christensen, Tom & Lægreid, Per (eds.), Autonomy and Regulation: Coping with Agencies in the Modern State (2006, Edward Elgar).Google Scholar

Francioni, Francesco, ‘International Human Rights in an Environmental Horizon’ (2010) 21(1) European Journal of International Law, pp. 41–55.Google Scholar

Fredriksson, Per G. & Millimet, Daniel L., ‘Is There a “California effect” in US Environmental Policymaking?’ (2002) 32(6) Regional Science and Urban Economics, pp. 737–764.Google Scholar

Friedrich, Jürgen, International Environmental ‘Soft Law’ (2013, Springer Verlag).Google Scholar

Fuller, Lon L., ‘Law and Human Interaction’ (1977) 47(3/4) Sociological Inquiry, pp. 59–89.Google Scholar

Galle, Brian, ‘Tax, Command … or Nudge? Evaluating the New Regulation’ (2014) 92(4) Texas Law Review, pp. 837–894.Google Scholar

Gereffi, Gary, Garcia-Johnson, Ronie & Sasser, Erika, ‘The NGO-Industrial Complex’ (2001) 125 Foreign Policy, pp. 56–65.Google Scholar

Gereffi, Gary & Mayer, Frederick, ‘Globalization and the Demand for Governance’, in Gereffi, , The New Offshoring of Jobs and Global Development (2006, IILS).Google Scholar

Giest, Sarah & Howlett, Michael, ‘Comparative Climate Change Governance: Lessons from European Transnational Municipal Network Management Efforts’ (2013) 23 Environmental Policy & Governance, pp. 341–353.Google Scholar

Gilad, Sharon, ‘It Runs in the Family: Meta-Regulation and Its Siblings’ (2010) 4(4) Regulation & Governance, pp. 485–506.Google Scholar

Glicksman, Robert L. & Kaime, Thoko, ‘A Comparative Analysis of Accountability Mechanisms for Ecosystem Services Markets in the United States and the European Union’ (2013) 2(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 259–283.Google Scholar

Gollata, Judith A. M. & Newig, Jens, ‘Policy Implementation through Multi-Level Governance: Analysing Practical Implementation of EU Air Quality Directives in Germany’ (2017) 24(9) Journal of European Public Policy, pp. 1308–1327.Google Scholar

Goulder, Lawrence H. & Schein, Andrew R., ‘Carbon Taxes versus Cap and Trade: A Critical Review’ (2013) 4(3) Climate Change Economics, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar

Gowdy, John M., ‘Progress and Environmental Sustainability’ (1994) 16(1) Environmental Ethics, pp. 41–55.Google Scholar

Gray, Wayne B. & Shimshack, Jay P., ‘The Effectiveness of Environmental Monitoring and Enforcement: A Review of the Empirical Evidence’ (2011) 5(1) Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, pp. 3–24.Google Scholar

Green, Jessica F., ‘Order out of Chaos: Public and Private Rules for Managing Carbon’ (2013) 13(2) Global Environmental Politics, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar

Green, Jessica F., Rethinking Private Authority. Agents and Entrepreneurs in Global Environmental Governance (2014, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Grimm, Dieter, ‘Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence’ (2007) 57(2) University of Toronto Law Journal, pp. 383–397.Google Scholar

Gulbrandsen, Lars H., ‘The Emergence and Effectiveness of the Marine Stewardship Council’ (2009) 33(4) Marine Policy, pp. 654–660.Google Scholar

Gulbrandsen, Lars H., Transnational Environmental Governance. The Emergence and Effects of the Certification of Forests and Fisheries (Edward Elgar, 2010).Google Scholar

Gunningham, Neil, ‘Environmental Law, Regulation and Governance: Shifting Architectures’ (2009) 21(2) Journal of Environmental Law, pp. 179–212.Google Scholar

Gunningham, Neil & Holley, Cameron ‘Next-generation Environment Regulation: Law, Regulation and Governance’ (2016) 12 Annual Review of Law and Social Science, pp 273–293.Google Scholar

Gunningham, Neil & Rees, Joseph, ‘Industry Self‐Regulation: An Institutional Perspective’ (1997) 19(4) Law & Policy, pp. 363–414.Google Scholar

Gunningham, Neil, Grabosky, Peter & Sinclair, Darren, Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy (1998, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, Theorie des kommunikativen Handlens (1981, Surhkamp).Google Scholar

Hahn, Robert W. & Richards, Kenneth R., ‘The Internationalisation of Environmental Regulation’ (1989) 30(2) Harvard International Law Journal, pp. 421–446.Google Scholar

Hahn, Robert W. & Stavins, Robert N., ‘Incentive-Based Environmental Regulation: A New Era from an Old Idea?’ (1991) 18(1) Ecology Law Quarterly, pp. 1–41.Google Scholar

Haites, Eric, ‘Harmonisation between National and International Tradeable Permit Schemes’, in OECD, Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading and Project-Based Mechanisms (OECD, 2004), pp. 105–118.Google Scholar

Halpérin, Jean-Louis, ‘L’Histoire de la Fabrication du Code le Code: Napoléon’ (2003) 4(107) Pouvoirs, pp. 11–21.Google Scholar

Handl, Gunther, ‘Compliance Control Mechanisms and International Environmental Obligations’ (1997) 5 Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law, pp. 29–50.Google Scholar

Harbo, Tor-Inge, ‘The Function of Proportionality in EU Law’ (2010) 16(2) European Law Journal, pp. 158–185.Google Scholar

Hardin, Garrett, ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’ (1968) 162(3859) Science, pp. 1243–1248.Google Scholar

Harrop, Stuart R., ‘The International Regulation of Animal Welfare and Conservation Issues Through Standards Dealing with the Trapping of Wild Mammals’ (2000) 21(3) Journal of Environmental Law, pp. 333–360.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law, 2nd edn. (1994, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Hawkins, Keith, Environment and Enforcement (1984, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Held, David & McGrew, Anthony (eds.), Governing Globalization: Power, Authority and Global Governance (2002, Polity Press).Google Scholar

Herwig, Alexia, ‘The Contribution of Global Administrative Law to Enhancing the Legitimacy of the Codex Alimentarius Commission’ in Dilling, Olaf, Herberg, Martin & Winter, Gerd (eds.), Transnational Administrative Rule-Making. Performance, Legal Effects and Legitimacy (2011, Hart).Google Scholar

Heyen, Dirk A., ‘Influence of the EU Chemicals Regulation on the US Policy Reform Debate: Is a “California Effect” within REACH?’ (2013) 2(1) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 95–115.Google Scholar

Heyes, Anthony, ‘Implementing Environmental Regulation: Enforcement and Compliance’ (2000) 17(2) Journal of Regulatory Economics, pp. 107–129.Google Scholar

Heyvaert, Veerle, ‘Codification and Centralisation of Environmental Law: A UK Perspective’ (2005) 5 Rivista Italiana di Diritto Pubblico Comunitario, pp. 1329–1343.Google Scholar

Heyvaert, Veerle, ‘Facing the Consequences of the Precautionary Principle in European Community Law’ (2006) 31(2) European Law Review, pp. 185–206.Google Scholar

Heyvaert, Veerle, ‘Globalizing Regulation: Reaching beyond the Borders of Chemical Safety’ (2009) 36(1) Journal of Law and Society, pp. 110–128.Google Scholar

Heyvaert, Veerle, ‘Levelling Down, Levelling Up, and Governing Across: Three Responses to Hybridization in International Law’ (2009) 20(3) European Journal of International Law, pp. 647–674.Google Scholar

Heyvaert, Veerle, ‘Governing Climate Change: Towards a New Paradigm for Risk Regulation’ (2011) 74(6) The Modern Law Review, pp. 817–844.Google Scholar

Heyvaert, Veerle, ‘Regulatory Competition: Accounting for the Transnational Dimension of Environmental Regulation’ (2012) 25(1) Journal of Environmental Law, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar

Heyvaert, Veerle, ‘What’s in a Name? The Covenant of Mayors as Transnational Environmental Regulation’ (2013) 22(1) Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, pp. 78–90.Google Scholar

Heyvaert, Veerle & Etty, Thijs, ‘Introducing Transnational Environmental Law’ (2012) 1(1) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar

Hickman, Kristin E. & Thomson, Mark, ‘Open Minds and Harmless Errors: Judicial Review of Postpromulgation Notice and Comment’ (2016) 101(2) Cornell Law Review, pp. 261–324.Google Scholar

Hillman, Kirsten, ‘International Control of Persistent Organic Pollutants: The UN Economic Commission for Europe Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution, and Beyond’ (1999) 8(22) Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, pp. 105–112.Google Scholar

Hobolth, Mogens & Sindbjerg Martinsen, Dorte, ‘Transgovernmental Networks in the European Union: Improving Compliance Effectively?’ (2013) 20(10) Journal of European Public Policy, pp. 1406–1424.Google Scholar

Holzinger, Katharina, Knill, Christoph & Sommerer, Thomas, ‘Environmental Policy Convergence: The Impact of International Harmonization, Transnational Communication, and Regulatory Competition’ (2008) 62(4) International Organization, pp. 553–587.Google Scholar

Honkasalo, Antero, ‘The EMAS Scheme: A Management Tool and Instrument of Environmental Policy’ (1998) 6(2) Journal of Cleaner Production, pp. 119–182.Google Scholar

Hood, Christopher, Explaining Economic Policy Reversals (1984, Open University Press).Google Scholar

Hood, Christopher, Rothstein, Henry & Baldwin, Robert, The Government of Risk: Understanding Risk Regulation Regimes (2001, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Huber, Bruce R., ‘How Did RGGI Do It? Political Economy and Emissions Auctions’ (2013) 40(1) Ecology Law Quarterly, pp. 59–106.Google Scholar

Huggins, Anna, ‘The Desirability of Depoliticization: Compliance in the International Climate Regime’ (2015) 4(1) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 101–124.Google Scholar

Hutter, Bridget M., Compliance: Regulation and Environment (1997, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Innes, Judith E. & Booher, David E., ‘Reframing Public Participation: Strategies for the 21st Century’ (2004) 5(4) Planning Theory & Practice, pp. 419–436.Google Scholar

Ivanova, Antonina & Angeles, Manuel, ‘Trade and Environment Issues in APEC’ (2006) 43(4) The Social Science Journal, pp. 629–642.Google Scholar

Jack, Brian, ‘Article 260(2) TFEU: An Effective Judicial Procedure for the Enforcement of Judgements?’ (2013) 19(3) European Law Journal, pp. 404–421.Google Scholar

Jacoby, Wade & Meunier, Sophie, ‘Europe and the Management of Globalization’ (2010) 17(3) Journal of European Public Policy, pp. 299–317.Google Scholar

Jasanoff, Sheila, ‘The Idiom of Co-Production’ in Jasanoff, Sheila (ed.), States of Knowledge. The Co-Production of Science and Social Order (2004, Routledge).Google Scholar

Jessup, Philip, Transnational Law (1956, Yale University Press).Google Scholar

Job, Jenny, Stout, Andrew & Smith, Rachael, ‘Culture Change in Three Taxation Administrations: From Command-and-Control to Responsive Regulation’ (2007) 29(1) Law & Policy, pp. 84–101.Google Scholar

Jordan, Andrew, ‘The Implementation of EU Environmental Policy: A Policy Problem without a Political Solution?’ (1999) 17 Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, pp. 69–90.Google Scholar

Jordan, Andrew, Wurzel, Rüdiger K.W. & Zito, Anthony R., New Instruments of Environmental Governance?: National Experiences and Prospects (2003, Frank Cass).Google Scholar

Jordan, Andrew, Wurzel, Rüdiger K.W. & Zito, Anthony R., ‘Still the Century of “New” Environmental Policy Instruments? Exploring Patterns of Innovation and Continuity’ (2013) 22(1) Environmental Politics, pp. 155–173.Google Scholar

Kaeding, Michael & Hardacre, Alan, ‘The European Parliament and the Future of Comitology after Lisbon’ (2013) 19(3) European Law Journal, pp. 382–403.Google Scholar

Kähler, Lorenz, ‘Contract-Management Duties as a New Regulatory Device’ (2013) 76(2) Law & Contemporary Problems, pp. 89–103.Google Scholar

Kaime, Thoko, ‘Symposium Foreword: Framing the Law and Policy for Ecosystem Services’ (2013) 2(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 211–216.Google Scholar

Kambhu, John, ‘Regulatory Standards, Noncompliance and Enforcement’ (1989) 6(1) Journal of Regulatory Economics, pp. 103–114.Google Scholar

Kang, Moon Jung & Park, Jihyoun, ‘Analysis of the Partnership Network in the Clean Development Mechanism’ (2013) 52 Energy Policy, pp. 543–553.Google Scholar

Kanie, Norichika & Biermann, Frank (eds.), Governing through Goals: Sustainable Development Goals as Governance Innovation (2017, The MIT Press).Google Scholar

Karavias, Markos, ‘Interactions between International Law and Private Fisheries Certification’, (2018) 7(1) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 165–184.Google Scholar

Kardasheva, Raya, ‘Package Deals in EU Legislative Politics’ (2013) 54(4) American Journal of Political Science, pp. 858–874.Google Scholar

Karkkainen, Bradley C., ‘Information as Environmental Regulation: TRI and Performance Benchmarking, Precursor to a New Paradigm’ (2001) 89(2) Georgetown Law Journal, pp. 257–370.Google Scholar

Kaul, Inge, Grunberg, Isabelle & Stern, Marc A. (eds.), Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century (1999, published for the United Nations Development Programme by Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Kellow, Aynsley & Zito, Anthony R., ‘Steering through Complexity: EU Environmental Regulation in the International Context’ (2002) 50(1) Political Studies, pp. 43–60.Google Scholar

Keohane, Nathaniel O., Revesz, Richard L. & Stavins, Robert O., ‘The Choice of Regulatory Instruments in Environmental Policy’ (1998) 22(2) Harvard Environmental Law Review, pp. 313–367.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O. & Victor, David G., ‘The Regime Complex for Climate Change’ (2011) 9(1) Perspectives on Politics, pp. 7–23.Google Scholar

Ketchen, James C., ‘Revisiting Fuller’s Critique of Hart: Managerial Control and the Pathology of Legal Systems: The Hart-Weber Nexus’ (2003) 53 University of Toronto Law Journal, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar

Kica, Evisa, ‘The Drive towards Nanotechnology Standardization: Shifting Roles in Governance and Key Challenges’, (2012) 3(2) European Journal of Risk Regulation, pp. 227–234.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, ‘The Concept of “Law” in Global Administrative Law’ (2009) 20(1) European Journal of International Law, pp. 23–57.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, Krisch, Nico & Stewart, Richard B., ‘The Emergence of Global Administrative Law’ (2005) 68(3/4) Law and Contemporary Problems, pp. 15–61.Google Scholar

Kingston, Suzanne, Heyvaert, Veerle & Čavoški, Aleksandra, European Environmental Law (2017, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, An Introduction to International Institutional Law, 2nd edn. (2009, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Kleinheisterkamp, Jan, ‘Financial Responsibility in European International Investment Policy’ (2014) 63(2) International & Comparative Law Quarterly, pp. 449–476.Google Scholar

Knappa, Kenneth J., Morris, R. Franklin Jr., Marshall, Thomas E. & Anthony Byrd, Terry, ‘Information Security Policy: An Organizational-Level Process Model’ (2009) 28 Computers & Security, pp. 493–508.Google Scholar

Knill, Christoph & Lehmkuhl, Dirk, ‘Private Actors and the State: Internationalization and Changing Patterns of Governance’ (2002) 15(1) Governance, pp. 41–63.Google Scholar

Knopf, Brigitte et al., ‘The European Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): Ex-Post Analysis, the Market Stability Reserve and Options for a Comprehensive Reform’, 19 Sept. 2014, FEEM Working Paper No. 79.2014. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2499457 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.Google Scholar

Koenig-Archibugi, Matthias, ‘Transnational Corporations and Global Accountability’ (2004) 39(2) Government and Opposition, pp. 234–259.Google Scholar

Koop, Christel & Lodge, Martin, ‘What Is Regulation? An Interdisciplinary Concept Analysis’ (2017) 11(1) Regulation & Governance, pp. 85–101.Google Scholar

Koremenos, Barbara & Betz, Timm, ‘The Design of Dispute Settlement Procedures in International Agreements’ in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. & Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (2012, Cambridge University Press), pp. 371–393.Google Scholar

Korkea-Aho, Emilia, ‘Laws in Progress? Reconceptualizing Accountability Strategies in the Era of Framework Norms’ (2013) 2(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 363–385.Google Scholar

Kosoy, Nicolás & Corbera, Esteve, ‘Payments for Ecosystem Services as Commodity Fetishism’ (2010) 69 Ecological Economics, pp. 1228–1236.Google Scholar

Kotsakis, Andreas, ‘Change and Subjectivity in International Environmental Law: The Micro-Politics of the Transformation of Biodiversity into Genetic Gold’ (2014) 3(1) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 127–147.Google Scholar

Kotzé, Louis, ‘Arguing Global Environmental Constitutionalism’ (2012) 1(1) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 199–233.Google Scholar

Kotzé, Louis, Global Environmental Governance: Law and Regulation for the 21st Century (2012, Edward Elgar).Google Scholar

Krisch, Nico, Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law (2010, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Krisch, Nico, ‘Who Is Afraid of Radical Pluralism? Legal Order and Political Stability in the Postnational Space’ (2011) 24(4) Ratio Juris, pp. 386–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krisch, Nico, ‘The Decay of Consent: International Law in an Age of Global Public Goods’ (2014) 108(1) American Journal of International Law, pp. 1–40.Google Scholar

Kulovesi, Kati, The WTO Dispute Settlement System: Challenges of the Environment, Legitimacy and Fragmentation (2011, Kluwer Law International).Google Scholar

Kulovesi, Kati, Morgera, Elisa & Muñoz, Miquel, ‘Environmental Integration and Multi-Faceted International Dimensions of EU Law: Unpacking the EU’s 2009 Climate and Energy Package’ (2011) 48(3) Common Market Law Review, pp. 829–891.Google Scholar

Kuo, Ming-Sung, ‘From Administrative Law to Administrative Legitimation? Transnational Administrative Law and the Process of European Integration’ (2012) 61(4) International & Comparative Law Quarterly, pp. 855–879.Google Scholar

Kurtzer, Paulette & Cooper, Alice, ‘Consumer Activism, EU Institutions and Global Markets: The Struggle over Biotech Foods’ (2007) 27(2) Journal of Public Policy, pp.103–128.Google Scholar

Kysar, Douglas, ‘Sustainable Development and Private Global Governance’ (2005) 83(7) Texas Law Review, pp. 2109–2166.Google Scholar

Ladeur, Karl-Heinz, ‘The Evolution of General Administrative Law and the Emergence of Postmodern Administrative Law’ (March 21, 2011). Osgoode CLPE Research Paper No. 16/2011. Available at SSRN http://ssrn.com/abstract=1792062 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1792062.Google Scholar

Laing, Timothy, Sato, Misato, Grubb, Michael & Comberti, Claudia, ‘The Effects and Side-Effects of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme’ 2014 5(4) Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, pp. 509–519.Google Scholar

Lanctot, Catherine J., ‘The Good Cause Exceptions: Danger to Notice and Comment Requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act’ (1980) 68(3) Georgetown Law Journal, pp. 765–782.Google Scholar

Lasswell, Harold, The Decision Process: Seven Categories of Functional Analysis (1956, University of Maryland Press).Google Scholar

Latin, Howard, ‘Ideal versus Real Regulatory Efficiency: Implementation of Uniform Standards and “Fine-Tuning” Regulatory Reforms’ (1985) 37(5) Stanford Law Review, pp. 1267–1332.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society (1987, Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Legg, Andrew, The Margin of Appreciation in International Human Rights Law. Deference and Proportionality (2012, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Leino, Päivi, ‘Efficiency, Citizens and Administrative Culture: The Politics of Good Administration in the EU’ (2014) 20(4) European Public Law, pp. 681–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lemos, Maria Carmen & Agrawal, Arun, ‘Environmental Governance’ (2006) 31 Annual Review of Environment and Resources, pp. 297–325.Google Scholar

Levi-Faur, David & Jordana, Jacint, ‘The Rise of Regulatory Capitalism: The Global Diffusion of a New Order’ (2005) 598(1) The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, pp. 200–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, David L., ‘Business and International Environmental Treaties: Ozone Depletion and Climate Change’ (1997) 39(3) California Management Review, pp. 53–71.Google Scholar

Lewis, Tammy L., ‘Transnational Conservation Movement Organizations: Shaping the Protected Area Systems of Less Developed Countries’ (2000) 5(1) Mobilization: An International Journal, pp. 103–121.Google Scholar

Lian, Koh Kheng, ‘Transboundary and Global Environmental Issues: The Role of ASEAN’ (2012) 1(1) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 67–82.Google Scholar

Light, Sarah E. & Orts, Eric, ‘Parallels in Public and Private Environmental Governance’ (2015) 5(1) Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law, pp. 1–72.Google Scholar

Lodge, Michael, Johnson, David, Le Gurun, Gwenaëlle, Wengler, Markus, Weaver, Phil & Gunn, Vikki, ‘Seabed Mining: International Seabed Authority Environmental Management Plan for the Clarion–Clipperton Zone. A Partnership Approach’ (2014) 49 Marine Policy, pp. 66–72.Google Scholar

Lovell, Heather C., ‘Governing the Carbon Offset Market’ 2010(1) WIRES Climate Change, pp. 353–362.Google Scholar

Lowe, Mary Frances, ‘Toward a Globally Harmonized System: Negotiating to Promote Public Health, Environmental Protection, and International Trade’, (2003) 27 Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, pp. 195–208.Google Scholar

Lurie, Jonathan, The Chicago Board of Trade 1895–1905: The Dynamics of Self-Regulation (1979, University of Illinois Press).Google Scholar

Lynch-Wood, Gary & Williamson, David, ‘The Receptive Capacity of Firms – Why Differences Matter’ (2011) 23(3) Journal of Environmental Law, pp. 383–413.Google Scholar

Maduro, Miguel Poiares, ‘The Importance of Being Called a Constitution: Constitutional Authority and the Authority of Constitutionalism’ (2005) 3(2/3) International Journal of Constitutional Law, pp. 332–356.Google Scholar

Maignan, Isabelle & Ralston, David A., ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from Businesses’ Self-Presentations’ (2002) 33(3) Journal of International Business Studies, pp. 497–514.Google Scholar

Maimaris, Joanne, ‘ISEAL Membership Linked to Improved Transparency, Accessibility and Rigour of a Standards Systems’ (14 July 2017), available at www.isealalliance.org/sustainability-news/iseal-membership-linked-improved-transparency-accessibility-and-rigour.Google Scholar

Majone, Giandomenico, ‘The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe’ (1994) 17(3) West European Politics, pp. 77–101.Google Scholar

Marcussen, Martin, ‘OECD Governance through Soft Law’ in Mörth, Ulrika (ed.), Soft Law in Governance and Regulation: An Interdisciplinary Analysis (2004, Edward Elgar), pp. 103–128.Google Scholar

Marmor, Andrei, ‘Legal Conventionalism’ (1998) 4(4) Legal Theory, pp. 509–531.Google Scholar

Marx, Axel & Cuypers, Dieter, ‘Forest Certification as a Global Environmental Governance Tool: What Is the Macro-effectiveness of the Forest Stewardship Council?’ (2010) 4(4) Regulation & Governance, pp. 408–434.Google Scholar

May, James R. & Daly, Erin, Global Environmental Constitutionalism (2014, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

McBarnet, Doreen & Whelan, Christopher, ‘The Elusive Spirit of the Law: Formalism and the Struggle for Legal Control’ (1991) 54(6) The Modern Law Review, pp. 848–873.Google Scholar

Mehling, Michael & Haites, Erik, ‘Mechanisms for Linking Emissions Trading Schemes’ (2009) 9(2) Climate Policy, pp. 169–184.Google Scholar

Meidinger, Errol E., ‘Forest Certification as a Global Civil Society Regulatory Institution’ in Errol Meidinger, Chris Elliot, & Oesten, Gerhard (eds.), The Social and Political Dimensions of Forest Certification (2003, Remagen-Oberwinter).Google Scholar

Meidinger, Errol E., ‘The New Environmental Law: Forest Certification’ (2003) 10 Buffalo Environmental Law Journal, pp. 211–300.Google Scholar

Meidinger, Errol E., ‘Beyond Westphalia: Competitive Legalization in Emerging Transnational Regulatory Systems’, in Brütsch, Christian & Dirk Lehmkuhl, (eds.), Law and Legalization in Transnational Relations (2007, Routledge), pp. 121–143.Google Scholar

Menon, Anand & Weatherill, Stephen, ‘Transnational Legitimacy in a Globalising World: How the European Union Rescues Its States’ (2008) 31(3) West European Politics, pp. 397–416.Google Scholar

Michaels, Ralf, ‘The Re-Statement of Non-State Law: The State, Choice of Law, and the Challenge from Global Legal Pluralism’ (2005) 51(3) The Wayne Law Review, pp. 1209–1258.Google Scholar

Michalopoulos, Sarantis, ‘EU member states still divided over endocrine disruptor regulation’ 22 Dec. 2016, EURACTIV, available at www.euractiv.com/section/health-consumers/news/eu-member-states-still-divided-over-endocrine-disruptor-regulation/.Google Scholar

Miliband, David, ‘The New Politics of Economics’, in Crouch, Colin & Marquand, David, Ethics and Markets: Co-operation and Competition within Capitalist Economies (1993, Oxford Blackwell).Google Scholar

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: The Assessment Series (2005, Washington, DC, Island Press).Google Scholar

Misonne, Delphine, ‘The Importance of Setting a Target: The EU Ambition of a High Level of Protection’ (2015) 4(1) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 11–36.Google Scholar

Mol, Arthur P.J., ‘Environmental Deinstitutionalization in Russia’ (2009) 11(3) Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, pp. 223–241.Google Scholar

Möllers, Christoph, ‘European Governance: Meaning and Value of a Concept’ (2006) 43(2) Common Market Law Review, pp. 313–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Möllers, Christoph, ‘Ten Years of Global Administrative Law’ (2015) 13(2) International Journal of Constitutional Law, pp. 469–472.Google Scholar

Morgan, Bronwen & Yeung, Karen, An Introduction to Law and Regulation (2007, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Morgera, Elisa, ‘Bilateralism at the Service of Community Interests? Non-Judicial Enforcement of Global Public Goods in the Context of Global Environmental Law’ (2012) 23(3) European Journal of International Law, pp. 743–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, David F. & Bendell, Jem, In the Company of Partners: Environmental Groups and Sustainable Development Post-Rio (1997, Polity Press).Google Scholar

Natural Capital Partners (NCP), The Carbon Neutral Protocol: The Global Standard for Carbon Neutral Programmes, Jan. 2017, available at https://assets.naturalcapitalpartners.com/downloads/The-CarbonNeutral-Protocol-Jan2017.pdf.Google Scholar

Nehl, Hanns Peter, Principles of Administrative Procedure in EC Law (1999, Hart Publishing).Google Scholar

Nicolaidis, Kalypso & Shaffer, Gregory, ‘Transnational Mutual Recognition Regimes: Governance without Global Government’ (2005) 68(3/4) Law & Contemporary Problems, pp. 263–317.Google Scholar

Noortmann, Math, Reinisch, August & Ryngaert, Cedric (eds.), Non-State Actors in International Law (2015, Hart Publishing).Google Scholar

Nwapi, Chilenye, ‘Jurisdiction by Necessity and the Regulation of the Transnational Corporate Actor’ (2013) 30(78) Utrecht Journal of International and European Law, pp. 24–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Gorman, Roderic, ‘Environmental Constitutionalism: A Comparative Study’ (2017) 6(3) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 435–463.Google Scholar

Ong, David M., ‘From “International” to “Transnational” Environmental Law? A Legal Assessment of the Contribution of the “Equator Principles” to International Environmental Law’ (2010) 79 Nordic Journal of International Law, pp. 35–74.Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, The Governance of Regulators, OECD Best Practice Principles for Regulatory Policy (2014, OECD Publishing).Google Scholar

Orlitzky, Marc, Schmidt, Frank L. & Rynes, Sara L., ‘Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-analysis’ (2003) 24(3) Organization Studies, pp. 403–441.Google Scholar

Ostrom, Elinor, ‘Polycentric Systems for Coping with Collective Action and Global Environmental Change’ (2010) 20(4) Global Environmental Change, pp. 550–557.Google Scholar

Ostrom, Elinor, Janssen, Marco A. & Anderies, John M., ‘Going beyond Panaceas’ (2007) 104(39) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, pp. 15176–15178.Google Scholar

Osuji, Onyeka K., ‘Corporate Social Responsibility, Juridification and Globalisation: “Inventive Interventionism” for a “Paradox”’ (2015) 11(3) International Journal of Law in Context, pp. 265–298.Google Scholar

Overdevest, Christine & Zeitlin, Jonathan, ‘Assembling an Experimentalist Regime: Transnational Governance Interactions in the Forest Sector’ (2014) 4(1) Regulation & Governance, pp. 22–48.Google Scholar

Parker, Christine, The Open Corporation: Effective Self-regulation and Democracy (2002, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Parker, Christine & Nielsen, Vibeke Lehmann, ‘Compliance: 14 Questions’ in Drahos, Peter (ed.), Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications (2017, The Australian National University Press), pp. 217–232.Google Scholar

Partnership for Market Readiness & International Carbon Action Partnership, Emissions Trading in Practice: A Handbook on Design and Implementation (2006, World Bank).Google Scholar

Patterson, Dennis & Afilalo, Ari, The New Global Trading Order: The Evolving State and the Future of Trade (2008, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses A. & Wouters, Jan, Informal International Lawmaking (2012, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses A. & Wouters, Jan, ‘When Structures Become Shackles: Stagnation and Dynamics in International Lawmaking’ (2014) 25(3) European Journal of International Law, pp. 733–763.Google Scholar

Peel, Jacqueline, Godden, Lee & Keenan, Rodney J., ‘Climate Law in an Era of Multi-Level Governance’ (2012) 1(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 245–280.Google Scholar

Pelkmans, Jacques, ‘The New Approach to Technical Harmonization and Standardization’ (1987) 25(3) Journal of Common Market Studies, pp. 249–269.Google Scholar

Penca, Jerneja, ‘Marketing the Market: The Ideology of Market Mechanisms for Biodiversity Conservation’ (2013) 2(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 235–257.Google Scholar

Peters, Anne, The Constitutionalist Reconstruction of International Law: Pros and Cons (NCCR International Trade Working Paper No. 11(July 2006).Google Scholar

Pirker, Benedikt, ‘Access to Justice in Environmental Matters and the Aarhus Convention’s Effects in the EU Legal Order: No Room for Nuanced Self-Executing Effect?’ (2016) 25(1) RECIEL, pp. 81–91.Google Scholar

Porter, Tony & Ronit, Karsten, ‘Self-Regulation as Policy Process: The Multiple and Criss-Crossing Stages of Private Rule-Making’ (2006) 39(41) Policy Sciences, pp. 41–72.Google Scholar

Power, Michael, ‘The Risk Management of Everything’ (2004) 5(3) The Journal of Risk Finance, pp. 58–65.Google Scholar

Prosser, Tony, ‘Regulation and Social Solidarity’ (2006) 33(3) Journal of Law and Society, pp. 364–387.Google Scholar

Prosser, Tony, The Regulatory Enterprise: Government Regulation and Legitimacy (2010, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Purnhagen, Kai, ‘Mapping Private Regulation – Classification, Market Access and Market Closure Policy and Law’s Response’, (2015) 49(2) Journal of World Trade, pp. 309–324.Google Scholar

Rabson, Mia, ‘Federal Carbon Tax Plan to follow Alberta Program, Include Individual Rebates’, 9 May 2017, The Globe and Mail, available at www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/federal-carbon-tax-plan-to-follow-alberta-program-include-individual-rebates/article34939245/.Google Scholar

Rahim, Mia Mahmudur, ‘Meta-Regulation Approach of Law: A Potential Legal Strategy to Develop Socially Responsible Business Self-Regulation in Least Developed Common Law Countries’ (2011) 40(2) Common Law World Review, pp. 174–206.Google Scholar

Ranson, Matthew & Stavins, Robert N., ‘Linkage of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Systems: Learning from Experience’ (2016) 16(3) Climate Policy, pp. 284–300.Google Scholar

Ratner, Stephen R., ‘Corporations and Human Rights: A Theory of Legal Responsibility’ (2001) 111(3) Yale Law Journal, pp. 443–545.Google Scholar

Raustiala, Kal, ‘The Architecture of International Cooperation: Transgovernmental Networks and the Future of International Law’ (2002) 43(1) Virginia Journal of International Law, pp. 1–92.Google Scholar

Ray, Christopher, ‘Transnational Co-operation between Rural Areas: Elements of a Political Economy of EU Rural Development’ (2001) 43(3) Sociologia Ruralis, pp. 279–295.Google Scholar

Rayfuse, Rosemary, ‘Precaution and the Protection of Marine Biodiversity in Areas beyond National Jurisdiction’ (2012) 27(4) The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, pp. 773–781.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, The Morality of Freedom (1986, Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Razzaque, Jona, ‘Payments for Ecosystem Services in Sustainable Mangrove Forest Management in Bangladesh’ (2017) 6(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 309–333.Google Scholar

Reid, Colin T., ‘Between Priceless and Worthless: Challenges in Using Market Mechanisms for Conserving Biodiversity’ (2013) 2(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 217–233.Google Scholar

Reynard, Pierre Claude, ‘Public Order and Privilege: Eighteenth-Century French Roots of Environmental Regulation’ (2002) 43(1) Technology and Culture, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar

Richardson, Benjamin J., ‘Socially Responsible Investing for Sustainability: Overcoming Its Incomplete and Conflicting Rationales’ (2013) 2(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 311–338.Google Scholar

Roessing Neto, Ernesto, ‘Linking Subnational Climate Change Policies: A Commentary on the California-Acre Process’ (2015) 4(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 425–437.Google Scholar

Rosen, Amanda M., ‘The Wrong Solution at the Right Time: The Failure of the Kyoto Protocol on Climate Change’ (2015) 43(1) Politics & Policy, pp. 30–58.Google Scholar

Rudder, Catherine E., ‘Private Governance as Public Policy: A Paradigmatic Shift’ (2008) 70(4) The Journal of Politics, pp. 899–913.Google Scholar

Ruggie, John Gerard, Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights (2013, W.W. Norton & Company).Google Scholar

Runge, C. Ford, ‘Trade Protectionism and Environmental Regulations: The New Nontariff Barriers’ (1990) 11 Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, pp. 47–61.Google Scholar

Rydin, Yvonne & Pennington, Mark, ‘Public Participation and Local Environmental Planning: The Collective Action Problem and the Potential of Social Capital’ (2000) 5(2) Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, pp. 153–169.Google Scholar

Sabel, Charles F. & Victor, David G., ‘Governing Global Problems under Uncertainty: Making Bottom-up Climate Policy Work’ (2017) 144(1) Climatic Change, pp. 15–27.Google Scholar

Sachs, Noah M., ‘Jumping the Pond: Transnational Law and the Future of Chemical Regulation’, (2009) 62 Vanderbilt Law Review, pp. 1815–1869.Google Scholar

Salzman, James & Thomson, Buzz, ‘Teaching Policy Instrument Choice in Environmental Law: The Five P’s’ (2013) 23(3) Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum, pp. 363–376.Google Scholar

Samaan, Andrew Watson, ‘Enforcement of International Environmental Treaties: An Analysis’ (1993) 5 Fordham Environmental Law Journal, pp. 261–283.Google Scholar

Sands, Philippe & Peel, Jacqueline, Principles of International Environmental Law (2012, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Sato, Hajime, ‘The Advocacy Coalition Framework and the Policy Process Analysis: The Case of Smoking Control in Japan’ (1999) 27(1) Policy Studies Journal, pp. 28–44.Google Scholar

Sauder, Michael & Nelson Espeland, Wendy, ‘The Discipline of Rankings: Tight Coupling and Organizational Change’ (2009) 74(1) American Sociological Review, pp. 62–82.Google Scholar

Savaresi, Annalisa, ‘The Paris Agreement: A New Beginning’ (2016) 34(1) Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, pp. 16–26.Google Scholar

Scharpf, Fritz, ‘Negative and Positive Integration in the Political Economy of European Welfare States’ in Rhodes, Martin & Mény, Yves (eds.), The Future of European Welfare (1996, Springer).Google Scholar

Schepel, Harm, The Constitution of Private Governance: Product Standards in the Regulation of Integrating Markets (2005, Hart Publishing).Google Scholar

Schiffman, Howard S. & Patricia MacPhee, Briony, ‘The Southern Bluefin Tuna Dispute Revisited: How Far Have We Come?’ (2014) 3(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 395–396.Google Scholar

Schlag, Pierre, ‘Rules and Standards’ (1985) 33(2) UCLA Law Review, pp. 379–430.Google Scholar

Schreuer, Christoph, ‘The Waning of the Sovereign State: Towards a New Paradigm for International Law?’ (1993) 6(4) European Journal of International Law, pp. 447–471.Google Scholar

Schultz, Thomas, Transnational Legality: Stateless Law and International Arbitration (2014, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Scott, Colin, ‘Analysing Regulatory Space: Fragmented Resources and Institutional Design’ (2001) Public Law, pp. 329–353.Google Scholar

Scott, Craig, ‘“Transnational Law” as Proto-Concept: Three Conceptions’ (2009) 19(7) German Law Journal, pp. 859–876.Google Scholar

Scott, Joanne, ‘From Brussels with Love: The Transatlantic Travels of European Law and the Chemistry of Regulatory Attraction’ (2009) 57(4) American Journal of Comparative Law, pp. 897–942.Google Scholar

Seidenfeld, Mark, ‘Demystifying Deossification: Rethinking Recent Proposals to Modify Judicial Review of Notice and Comment Rulemaking’ (1997) 75(3) Texas Law Review, pp. 483–524.Google Scholar

Shäfer, Armin, ‘Resolving Deadlock: Why International Organisations Introduce Soft Law’ (2006) 12(2) European Journal of International Law, pp. 194–208.Google Scholar

Shaffer, Gregory (ed.), Transnational Legal Ordering and State Change (2012, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Shaffer, Gregory ‘How the WTO Shapes Regulatory Governance’ (2015) 9(1) Regulation & Governance, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar

Shaffer, Gregory ‘Theorizing Transnational Legal Ordering’ (2016) 12 Annual Review of Law and Social Science, pp. 231–253.Google Scholar

Shaffer, Gregory & Pollack, Mark A., ‘Hard vs. Soft Law: Alternatives, Complements, and Antagonists in International Governance’ (2010) 94 Minnesota Law Review, pp. 706–799.Google Scholar

Sieberson, Stephen C., ‘Inching towards EU Supranationalism? Qualified Majority Voting and Unanimity under the Treaty of Lisbon’ (2010) 50(4) Virginia Journal of International Law, pp. 919–996.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Darren, ‘Self-Regulation versus Command and Control? Beyond False Dichotomies’, (1997) 19(4) Law & Policy, pp. 529–559.Google Scholar

Slager, Rieneke, Gond, Jean-Pascal & Moon, Jeremy, ‘Standardization as Institutional Work: The Regulatory Power of a Responsible Investment Standard’ (2012) 33 (5–6) Organization Studies, pp. 763–790.Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie, ‘International Law in a World of Liberal States’ (1995) 6(3) European Journal of International Law, pp. 503–538.Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie, ‘Disaggregated Sovereignty: Towards the Public Accountability of Global Government Networks’ (2004) 39(2) Government & Opposition, pp. 159–190.Google Scholar

Sofronova, Ekaterina, Holley, Cameron & Nagaran, Vijaya, ‘Environmental Non-governmental Organizations and Russian Environmental Governance: Accountability, Participation and Collaboration’ (2014) 3(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 341–371.Google Scholar

Soltau, Friedrich, ‘Common Concern of Humankind’ in Carlarne, Cinnamon P., Gray, Kevin R. & Tarasofsky, Richard (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Climate Change Law (2016, Oxford University Press), pp. 203–211.Google Scholar

Somek, Alexander, ‘Constituent Power in National and Transnational Contexts’ (2012) 3(1) Transnational Legal Theory, pp. 31–60.Google Scholar

Starr, Randy, Newfrock, Jim & Delurey, Michael, ‘Enterprise Resilience: Managing Risk in the Networked Economy’ (2005) Strategy and Business, pp. 1–11, available at http://theicor.org/art/present/art/ARORRM00030.pdf.Google Scholar

Steiner, Henry J. & Vagts, Detlev F., Transnational Legal Problems, 2nd edn. (1976, Foundation Press).Google Scholar

Steinzor, Rena I., ‘Reinventing Environmental Regulation: The Dangerous Journey from Command to Self-Control’ (1998) 22(1) Harvard Environmental Law Review, pp. 103–202.Google Scholar

Sternberg, Claudia Schrag, The Struggle for EU Legitimacy (2013, Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar

Stewart, Richard B., ‘Controlling Environmental Risks through Economic Incentives’ (1988) 13(2) Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, pp. 153–170.Google Scholar

Stewart, Richard B., ‘Models for Environmental Regulation: Central Planning Versus Market-Based Approaches’ (1992) 19(3) Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, pp. 547–562.Google Scholar

Stewart, Richard B., ‘Remedying Disregard in Global Regulatory Governance: Accountability, Participation, and Responsiveness’ (2014) 108(2) American Journal of International Law, pp. 211–270.Google Scholar

Stewart, Richard B., ‘The Normative Dimensions and Performance of Global Administrative Law’ (2015) 13(2) International Journal of Constitutional Law, pp. 499–506.Google Scholar

Stokes, Elen, ‘The EC Courts’ Contribution to Refining the Parameters of Precaution’ (2008) 11(4) Journal of Risk Research, pp. 491–507.Google Scholar

Streck, Charlotte & Lin, Jolene, ‘Making Markets Work: A Review of CDM Performance and the Need for Reform’ (2008) 19(2) European Journal of International Law, pp. 409–442.Google Scholar

Suder, Gabriele, ‘Regional Trade Agreements and Regionalisation: Motivations and Limits of a Global Phenomenon’ (2013) 4 (1) ANU Centre for European Studies Briefing Paper Series, available at http://ces.anu.edu.au/research/publications/regional-trade-agreements-and-regionalisation-motivations-and-limits-global-ph.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R., Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle (2005, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Sweet, Alec Stone, ‘The New Lex Mercatoria and Transnational Governance’ (2006) 13(5) Journal of European Public Policy, pp. 627–646.Google Scholar

Tallberg, Jonas, ‘Paths to Compliance: Enforcement, Management, and the European Union’ (2002) 56(3) International Organization, pp. 609–643.Google Scholar

Tamm Hallström, Kristina & Boström, Magnus, Transnational Multi-Stakeholder Standardization: Organizing Fragile Non-State Authority (2010, Edward Elgar).Google Scholar

Taylor, Christopher, Pollard, Simon, Rocks, Sophie & Angus, Andy, ‘Selecting Policy Instruments for Better Environmental Regulation: A Critique and Future Research Agenda’ (2012) 22(4) Environmental Policy and Governance, pp. 268–292.Google Scholar

Terpan, Fabien, ‘Soft Law in the European Union – The Changing Nature of EU Law’ (2015) 21(1) European Law Journal, pp. 68–96.Google Scholar

Teubner, Gunther (ed.), Global Law without a State (Ashgate, 1997).Google Scholar

Teubner, Gunther ‘The Project of Constitutional Sociology: Irritating Nation State Constitutionalism’ (2013) 4(1) Transnational Legal Theory, pp. 44–58.Google Scholar

Thornhill, Chris, ‘National Sovereignty and the Constitution of Transnational Law: A Sociological Approach to a Classical Antinomy’ (2013) 3(4) Transnational Legal Theory, pp. 394–460.Google Scholar

Tietenberg, T. H., ‘Economic Instruments for Environmental Regulation’ (1990) 6(1) Oxford Review of Economic Policy, pp. 17–33.Google Scholar

Torres, Pedro Ballesteros & Doubrava, Roman, ‘The Covenant of Mayors: Cities Leading the Fight against the Climate Change’ in Van Staden, Maryke & Musco, Francesco (eds.), Local Governments and Climate Change (2010, Springer), pp. 91–98.Google Scholar

Trubek, David M. & Trubek, Louise G., ‘New Governance & Legal Regulation: Complementarity, Rivalry, and Transformation’ (2007) 13(3) Columbia Journal of European Law, pp. 539–564.Google Scholar

van Asselt, Harro, ‘Pluralism, Informality and Transnational Environmental Law’ (2014) 3(1) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 173–189.Google Scholar

van Asselt, Harro, The Fragmentation of Global Climate Governance: Consequences and Management of Regime Interactions (2014, Edward Elgar).Google Scholar

Van Erp, Judith, Spapens, Toine & van Wingerde, Karin, ‘Legal and Extralegal Enforcement of Pollution by Seagoing Vessels’ in Wyatt, Tanya (ed.), Hazardous Waste and Pollution. Preventing Green Crimes (2016, Springer International).Google Scholar

Vankrunkelsven, P., Merckx, K., De Meyere, M. & Amy, J. J., ‘De Orde van geneesheren op een keerpunt: hervormen of verdwijnen’ (2012) 68(2) Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, pp. 57–65.Google Scholar

Verbruggen, Paul, ‘Gorillas in the Closet? Public and Private Actors in the Enforcement of Transnational Private Regulation’ (2013) 7(4) Regulation & Governance, pp. 512–532.Google Scholar

Verschuuren, Jonathan, ‘Contribution of the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights to Sustainable Development in Europe’ in Scholtz, Werner & Verschuuren, Jonathan (eds.), Regional Integration and Sustainable Development in a Globalised World (2015, Edward Elgar), pp, 363–385.Google Scholar

Vogel, David, ‘The Private Regulation of Global Corporate Conduct’ (2010) 49(1) Business & Society, pp. 68–87.Google Scholar

Vogel, David, Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy (1997, Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

von Benda-Beckmann, Franz & von Benda-Beckmann, Keebet, ‘The Dynamics of Change and Continuity in Plural Legal Orders’ (2006) 53(4) Journal of Legal Pluralism & Unofficial Law, pp. 1–44.Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, Armin, Goldmann, Matthias & Venzke, Ingo, ‘From Public International to International Public Law: Translating World Public Opinion into International Public Authority’ (2017) 28(1) European Journal of International Law, pp. 115–145.Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, Armin & Schill, Stephan, ‘Overcoming Absolute Primacy: Respect for National Identity under the Lisbon Treaty’ (2011) 48(1) Common Market Law Review, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar

von Homeyer, Ingmar, ‘Emerging Experimentalism in EU Environmental Governance’ in Sabel, Charles F. & Zeitlin, Jonathan (eds.), Experimentalist Governance in the European Union (2010, Oxford University Press), pp. 121–150.Google Scholar

Vos, Ellen (ed.), European Risk Governance: Its Science, Its Inclusiveness and Its Effectiveness, Connex Report Series No. 6 (2008).Google Scholar

Vos, Ellen ‘Making Informal International Law Accountable: Lessons from the EU’ in Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses A. & Wouters, Jan (eds.), Informal International Lawmaking (2012, Oxford University Press), pp. 369–381.Google Scholar

Weber, Franziska, ‘European Integration Assessed in the Light of the “Rules vs Standards Debate”’ (2013) 35(2) European Journal of Law & Economics, pp. 187–210.Google Scholar

Weiler, Joseph H. H., ‘The Geology of International Law – Governance, Democracy and Legitimacy,’ (2003) 63 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, pp. 547–562.Google Scholar

Wennerås, Pål, The Enforcement of EC Environmental Law (2007, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Wiener, Jonathan Baert, ‘Global Environmental Regulation: Instrument Choice in Legal Context’ (1999) 108(4) The Yale Law Journal, pp. 677–800.Google Scholar

Windholz, Eric & Hodge, Graeme A., ‘Conceptualising Social and Economic Regulation: Implications for Modern Regulators and Regulatory Activity’ (2012) 38(2) Monash University Law Review, pp. 212–237.Google Scholar

Winter, Gerd, ‘Transnational Administrative Comitology: The Global Harmonisation of Chemicals Classification and Labelling’ in Dilling, Olaf, Herberg, Martin & Winter, Gerd (eds.), Transnational Administrative Rule-Making (2011, Hart Publishing).Google Scholar

World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future (1987, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Wurzel, Rüdiger K. W., Zito, Anthony R. & Jordan, Andrew J., Environmental Governance in Europe (2013, Edward Elgar).Google Scholar

Yoshida, Osamu, ‘Soft Enforcement of Treaties: The Montreal Protocol’s Noncompliance Procedure and the Functions of Internal International Institutions’ (1999) 1 Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy, pp. 95–142.Google Scholar

Zumbansen, Peer, ‘Transnational Legal Pluralism’ (2010) 1(2) Transnational Legal Theory, pp. 141–189.Google Scholar

Zumbansen, Peer, ‘Neither “Public” Nor “Private”, “National” Nor “International”: Transnational Corporate Governance from a Legalist Pluralist Perspective’ (2011) 38(1) Journal of Law and Society, pp. 50–75.Google Scholar

Zumbansen, Peer, ‘Transnational Private Regulatory Governance: Ambiguities of Public Authority and Private Power’ (2013) 76(2) Law & Contemporary Problems, pp. 117–138.Google Scholar

Zúñiga Schroder, Humberto, Harmonization, Equivalence and Mutual Recognition of Standards in WTO Law (2011, Kluwer Law International).Google Scholar