Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T04:12:33.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2017

Robert Lane
Robert Lane
Affiliation:
University of West Georgia
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Peirce on Realism and Idealism , pp. 195 - 200
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almeder, R. (1980). The Philosophy of Charles S. Peirce: A Critical Introduction. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Almeder, R. (1985). Peirce’s Thirteen Theories of Truth. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 21(1), 77–94.Google Scholar
Altshuler, B. (1980). Peirce’s Theory of Truth and His Early Idealism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 16(2), 118–140.Google Scholar
Apel, K.-O. (2004). Peirce’s Theory of Reality and Truth. In de Groot, J., ed., Nature in American Philosophy. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, pp. 37–52.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation, Vol. 2. Barnes, J., ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. (2004). How Do Particulars Stand to Universals? In Zimmerman, D., ed., Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 139–154.Google Scholar
Atkin, A. (2016). Peirce. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). Sense and Sensibilia. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. M. and Ladd-Franklin, C. (1902). Truth and Falsity and Error. In Baldwin, J. M., ed., Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology, Vol. 2. New York: The Macmillan Company, p. 720.Google Scholar
Bergman, M. (2011). Peirce’s Philosophy of Communication. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Berkeley, G. ([1710] 1874). A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Krauth, C. P., ed. Philadelphia, PA: J. B. Lippinoctt & Co.Google Scholar
Berkeley, G. ([1710] 1998). A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Dancy, J., ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boler, J. (1963). Charles Peirce and Scholastic Realism: A Study of Peirce’s Relation to John Duns Scotus. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Boler, J. (2004). Peirce and Medieval Thought. In Misak, C., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Peirce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 58–86.Google Scholar
Cooke, E. (2007). Peirce’s Pragmatic Theory of Inquiry: Fallibilism and Indeterminacy. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
David, M. (2016). The Correspondence Theory of Truth. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, fall 2013 edition, Zalta, E., ed. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/truth-correspondence/.Google Scholar
DeGrazia, D. (2005). Human Identity and Bioethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Devitt, M. (1997). Realism and Truth, 2nd edn. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. (1982). Realism. Synthese, 52(1), 55–112.Google Scholar
Englebretsen, G. (2006). Bare Facts and Naked Truths: A New Correspondence Theory of Truth. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Fisch, M. (1986). Peirce, Semeiotic and Pragmatism: Essays by Max H. Fisch. Ketner, K. and Kloesel, C., eds. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Fisch, M. and Turquette, A.. (1966). Peirce’s Triadic Logic. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 2(2), 71–85; reprinted in Peirce, Semeiotic and Pragmatism: Essays by Max H. Fisch. K. Ketner and C. Kloesel, eds. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 171–183.Google Scholar
Flew, A. (1984). A Dictionary of Philosophy, rev. 2nd edn. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Forster, P. (2011). Peirce and the Threat of Nominalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, L. (1997). Peirce’s Reality and Berkeley’s Blunders. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 35(2), 253–268.Google Scholar
Galluzzo, G. and Loux, M., eds. (2015). The Problem of Universals in Contemporary Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glanzberg, M. (2014). Truth. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, fall 2014 edition, E. Zalta, ed. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/truth/.Google Scholar
Guyer, P. and Horstmann, R.-P. (2015). Idealism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, fall 2015 edition, E. Zalta, ed. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/idealism/.Google Scholar
Haack, S. (1976). The Pragmatist Theory of Truth. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 27(3), 231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haack, S. (1978). Philosophy of Logics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haack, S. (1992). Extreme Scholastic Realism: Its Relevance to Philosophy of Science Today. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 28(1), 19–50.Google Scholar
Haack, S. (1994). How the Critical Common-sensist Sees Things. Histoire Épistémologie Langage, 16(1), 9–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haack, S. (1997). The First Rule of Reason. In Brunning, J. and Forster, P., eds., The Rule of Reason. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 241–261.Google Scholar
Haack, S. (2003). Defending Science – Within Reason: Between Scientism and Cynicism. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Haack, S., ed. (2006). Pragmatism, Old and New. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Haack, S. (2013). The Real, the Fictional and the Fake. Spazio Filosofico (8), 209–217.Google Scholar
Haack, S. (2016). The World According to Innocent Realism. In Göhner, J. and Jung, E.-M., eds., Susan Haack: Reintegrating Philosophy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp. 33–55.Google Scholar
Hausman, C. R. (1993). Charles S. Peirce’s Evolutionary Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Havenel, J. (2008). Peirce’s Clarifications of Continuity. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 44(1), 86–133.Google Scholar
Hirst, R. J. (1967). Realism. In Edwards, P., ed., The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 7. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co. and the Free Press, pp. 77–83.Google Scholar
Hookway, C. (1985). Peirce. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hookway, C. (2000). Truth, Rationality and Pragmatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hookway, C. (2012). The Pragmatic Maxim: Essays on Peirce and Pragmatism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jardine, N. (1986). The Fortunes of Inquiry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. ([1783] 2004). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. Zöller, G., ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. ([1787] 1998). Critique of Pure Reason. Guyer, P. and Wood, A., eds. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Khlentzos, D. (2004). Naturalistic Realism and the Antirealist Challenge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Khlentzos, D. (2016). Challenges to Metaphysical Realism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, winter 2016 edition, Zalta, E., ed. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/realism-sem-challenge/.Google Scholar
Lane, R. (1997). Peirce’s “Entanglement” with the Principles of Excluded Middle and Contradiction. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 33(3), 680–703.Google Scholar
Lane, R. (1999). Peirce’s Triadic Logic Revisited. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 35(2), 284–311.Google Scholar
Lane, R. (2004). On Peirce’s Early Realism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 40(4), 575–605.Google Scholar
Lane, R. (2007a). Peirception: Haack’s Critical Common-sensism about Perception. In de Waal, C., ed., Susan Haack: A Lady of Distinctions – The Philosopher Responds to Her Critics. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, pp. 109–122.Google Scholar
Lane, R. (2007b). Peirce’s Modal Shift: From Set Theory to Pragmaticism. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 45(4), 551–576.Google Scholar
Lane, R. (2009). Persons, Signs, Animals: A Peircean Account of Personhood. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 45(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
Lane, R. (2011a). The Final Incapacity: Peirce on Intuition and the Continuity of Mind and Matter, Part I. Cognitio, 12(1), 105–119.Google Scholar
Lane, R. (2011b). The Final Incapacity: Peirce on Intuition and the Continuity of Mind and Matter, Part II. Cognitio, 12(2), 237–256.Google Scholar
Legg, C. (2014). Charles Peirce’s Limit Concept of Truth. Philosophy Compass, 9(3), 204–213.Google Scholar
Loux, M. (2001). Realism and Anti-Realism. In Loux, M., ed., Metaphysics: Contemporary Readings. New York: Routledge, pp. 449–458.Google Scholar
Mayorga, R. M. (2007). From Realism to “Realicism”: The Metaphysics of Charles Sanders Peirce. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Mayorga, R. M. (2012). Peirce’s Moral “Realicism.” In de Waal, C. and Skowronski, K., eds., The Normative Thought of Charles S. Peirce. New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 101–124.Google Scholar
Meyers, R. (1985). Peirce’s Doubts about Idealism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 21(2), 223–239.Google Scholar
Meyers, R. (2005). Peirce’s “Cheerful Hope” and the Varieties of Realism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 41(2), 321–341.Google Scholar
Michael, F. (1988). Two Forms of Scholastic Realism in Peirce’s Philosophy. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 24(3), 317–348.Google Scholar
Migotti, M. (1998). Peirce’s Double Aspect Theory of Truth. In Misak, C., ed., Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 24: Pragmatism, pp. 75–108.Google Scholar
Misak, C. (1991/2004). Truth and the End of Inquiry: A Peircean Account of Truth, expanded paperback edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Misak, C. (2013). The American Pragmatists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, M. (2010). Peirce’s Cantor. In Moore, M., ed., New Essays on Peirce’s Mathematical Philosophy. Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court, pp. 323–362.Google Scholar
Morgan, C. (1979). Modality, Analogy, and Ideal Experiments According to C. S. Peirce. Synthese, 41(1), 65–83.Google Scholar
Morgan, C. (1981). Peirce-Semantics for Modal Logics. In Ketner, K., Ransdell, J., Eisele, C., Fisch, M., and Hardwick, C., eds., Proceedings of the C. S. Peirce Bicentennial International Congress. Lubbock: Texas Tech Press, pp. 207–215.Google Scholar
Murphey, M. (1961). The Development of Peirce’s Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Murphey, M. (1968). Kant’s Children the Cambridge Pragmatists. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 4(1), 3–33.Google Scholar
Myrvold, W. (1995). Peirce on Cantor’s Paradox and the Continuum. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 31(3), 508–541.Google Scholar
Ney, A. (2014). Metaphysics: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, B. (1989). Peirce’s Definitions of Continuity and the Concept of Possibility. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 25(2), 149–174.Google Scholar
Parks, R. Z. (1971). The Mystery of Phi and Psi. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 7(3), 176–177.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (2000). Indeterminate Identity: Metaphysics and Semantics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce Edition Project (2001). “Scientific Fallibilism”: Peirce’s Forgotten Lecture of 1893. Peirce Project Newsletter, 4(1). www.iupui.edu/~peirce/news/4_1/4.1.htm.Google Scholar
Potter, V. (1996). Peirce on Continuity. In Potter, V. and Colapietro, V., eds., Peirce’s Philosophical Perspectives. New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 117–123.Google Scholar
Potter, V. and Shields, P. (1977). Peirce’s Definitions of Continuity. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 13(1), 20–34.Google Scholar
Price, H. (2003). Truth as Convenient Friction. Journal of Philosophy, 100(4), 167–190.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, Truth and History. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1995). Peirce’s Continuum. In Ketner, K., ed., Peirce and Contemporary Thought: Philosophical Inquiries. New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Riley, G. (1974). Peirce’s Theory of Individuals. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 10(3), 135–165.Google Scholar
Robin, R. (1967). Annotated Catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Robin, R. (1971). The Peirce Papers: A Supplementary Catalogue. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 7(1): 37–57.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, S. (2004). Peirce’s Pragmatic Account of Perception: Issues and Implications. In Misak, C., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Peirce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 193–213.Google Scholar
Savan, D. (1995). Peirce and Idealism. In Ketner, K., ed., Peirce and Contemporary Thought. New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 315–328.Google Scholar
Scheffler, I. ([1974] 2011). Four Pragmatists: A Critical Introduction to Peirce, James, Mead and Dewey. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sfendoni-Mentzou, D. (1995). Reply to Savan. In Ketner, K., ed., Peirce and Contemporary Thought. New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 329–337.Google Scholar
Short, T. L. (1996). Review Essay. Synthese, 106(3), 409–430.Google Scholar
Short, T. L. (2000). Peirce on the Aim of Inquiry: Another Reading of “Fixation.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 31(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
Short, T. L. (2007a). Peirce’s Theory of Signs. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Short, T. L. (2007b). Response [part of a symposium on Short 2007a]. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 43(4), 663–693.Google Scholar
Short, T. L. (2010). Did Peirce Have a Cosmology? Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 46(4), 521–543.Google Scholar
Short, T. L. (2015). Empiricism Expanded. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 51(1), 1–33.Google Scholar
Skagestad, P. (1981). The Road of Inquiry. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Skow, B. (2010). Deep Metaphysical Indeterminacy. Philosophical Quarterly, 60(240), 851–858.Google Scholar
Smart, J. (1986). Realism v. Idealism. Philosophy, 61(237), 295–312.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. (1953). The Pragmatic Philosophy of C. S. Peirce. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Turquette, A. (1967). Peirce’s Phi and Psi Operators for Triadic Logic. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 3(2), 66–73.Google Scholar
Turquette, A. (1969). Peirce’s Complete Systems of Triadic Logic. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 5(4), 199–210.Google Scholar
Turquette, A. (1972). Dualism and Trimorphism in Peirce’s Triadic Logic. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 8(3), 131–140.Google Scholar
Turquette, A. (1976). Minimal Axioms for Peirce’s Triadic Logic. Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, 22(1), 169–176.Google Scholar
Turquette, A. (1978). Alternative Axioms for Peirce’s Triadic Logic. Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, 24(25–30), 443–444.Google Scholar
Turquette, A. (1981/4). Quantification for Peirce’s Preferred System of Triadic Logic. Studia Logica, 40(4), 373–382.Google Scholar
Turquette, A. (1983). Defining Peirce’s Verum. In Cauchy, V., ed., Philosophy and Culture: Actes du XVIIe Con’gres mondial de Philosophie, Vol. 2. Montreal: Editions Montmorency, pp. 842–845.Google Scholar
Whately, R. (1848). Easy Lessons on Reasoning, 5th revised edn. London: John W. Parker.Google Scholar
Wiggins, D. (2004). Reflections on Inquiry and Truth Arising from Peirce’s Method for the Fixation of Belief. In Misak, C., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Peirce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 87–126.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, P. R. (2013). Concise Thesaurus of Traditional English Metaphors. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (1990). Descartes: The Project of Pure Inquiry. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. (2012). The Perception of Generals. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 48(2), 169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Robert Lane, University of West Georgia
  • Book: Peirce on Realism and Idealism
  • Online publication: 18 December 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108231657.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Robert Lane, University of West Georgia
  • Book: Peirce on Realism and Idealism
  • Online publication: 18 December 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108231657.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Robert Lane, University of West Georgia
  • Book: Peirce on Realism and Idealism
  • Online publication: 18 December 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108231657.009
Available formats
×