Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T01:31:55.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2017

Adam Oliver
Adam Oliver
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Origins of Behavioural Public Policy , pp. 179 - 191
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdellaoui, M. 2000. Parameter-Free Elicitation of Utilities and Probability Weighting Functions. Management Science 46: 1497–1512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akerlof, G. A., and Kranton, R. E.. 2010. Identity Economics: How Our Identities Shape Our Work, Wages, and Well-Being. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allais, M. 1953. Le Comportement de L’Homme Rationnel Devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de L’Ecole Américaine. Econometrica 21: 503–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allais, M. 1990. Allais Paradox. In: Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. (eds.). The New Palgrave: Utility and Probability. New York: Macmillan Press, pp. 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariely, D. 2008. Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Ariely, D., and Carmon, Z.. 2000. Gestalt Characteristics of Experiences: The Defining Features of Summarized Events. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 13: 191–201.3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariely, D., and Loewenstein, G.. 2000. When Does Duration Matter in Judgment and Decision Making? Journal of Experimental Psychology 129: 508–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G. and Prelec, D.. 2003. ‘Coherent Arbitrariness’: Stable Demand Curves without Stable Preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118: 73–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariely, D., Gneezy, U., Loewenstein, G. and Mazar, A.. 2009. Large Stakes and Big Mistakes. Review of Economic Studies 76: 451–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, . 1998 [350BC]. The Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ashraf, N., Camerer, C. F. and Loewenstein, G.. 2005. Adam Smith, Behavioral Economist. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19: 131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, R. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Behavioural Insights Team. 2010. Applying Behavioural Insights to Health. London: Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
Behavioural Insights Team. 2011. Behaviour Change and Energy Use. London: Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
Behavioural Insights Team. 2013. Applying Behavioural Insight to Organ Donation: Preliminary Results from a Randomised Controlled Trial. London: Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
Bell, S., Hindmoor, A. and Mols, F.. 2010. Persuasion as Governance: A State-Centric Relational Perspective. Public Administration 88: 851–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham, J. 1988 [1781]. The Principles of Morals and Legislation. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, M., and Loomes, G.. 1992. Failures of the Reduction Principle in an Ellsberg-Type Problem. Theory and Decision 32: 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernoulli, D. 1738. Specimen Theoriae Novae de Mensura Sortis. Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae 5: 175–192. Translated by Sommer, L. 1954. Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk. Econometrica 22: 23–36.Google Scholar
Besley, T., Bevan, G. and Burchardi, K.. 2009. Naming and Shaming: The Impacts of Different Regimes on Hospital Waiting Times in England and Wales. London: LSE Health Discussion Paper. London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
Bevan, G., and Fasolo, B.. 2013. Models of Governance of Public Services: Empirical and Behavioural Analysis of ‘Econs’ and ‘Humans’. In: Oliver, A (ed.). Behavioural Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 38–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleichrodt, H., and Pinto, J. L.. 2000. A Parameter-Free Elicitation of the Probability Weighting Function in Medical Decision Analysis. Management Science 46: 1485–1496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, J. 1991. Weighing Goods. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Broome, J. 1994. Discounting the Future. Philosophy and Public Affairs 23: 128–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruni, L., and Sugden, R.. 2007. The Road Not Taken: How Psychology Was Removed from Economics, and How It Might Be Brought Back. The Economic Journal 117: 146–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruni, L., and Sugden, R.. 2008. Fraternity: Why the Market Need Not Be a Morally Free Zone. Economics and Philosophy 24: 35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruni, L., and Sugden, R.. 2013. Reclaiming Virtue Ethics for Economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives 27: 141–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabinet Office and Institute for Government. 2010. MINDSPACE: Influencing Behaviour through Public Policy. London: Cabinet Office and Institute for Government.Google Scholar
Cahill, K., and Perera, R.. 2008. Competitions and Incentives for Smoking Cessation. The Cochrane Library 2: 1–31.Google Scholar
Camerer, C. F. 1989. An Experimental Test of Several Generalized Utility Theories. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2: 61–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, C. 1995. Individual Decision Making. In: Kagel, J. H., and Roth, A. E. (eds.). The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 587–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, C. F., and Ho, T.. 1994. Violations of the Betweenness Axiom and Non-Linearity in Probability. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 8: 167–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, C. F., and Loewenstein, G.. 2003. Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, Future. In: Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G. and Rabin, M. (eds.). Advances in Behavioral Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 3–51.Google Scholar
Camerer, C., Issacharoff, S., Loewenstein, G., O’Donoghue, T. and Rabin, M.. 2003. Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the Case for ‘Asymmetric Paternalism’. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1151: 1211–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L. 1999. Raising the Stakes in the Ultimatum Game: Experimental Evidence from Indonesia. Economic Inquiry 37: 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, S. M., Reeves, D., Kontopantelis, E., Sibbald, B. and Roland, M.. 2009. Effects of Pay for Performance on the Quality of Primary Care in England. New England Journal of Medicine 361: 368–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chew, S. H. 1983. A Generalisation of the Quasilinear Mean with Applications to the Measurement of Income Inequality and Decision Theory Resolving the Allais Paradox. Econometrica 51: 1065–1092.Google Scholar
Chew, S. H., and Waller, W. S.. 1986. Empirical Tests of Weighted Utility Theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 30: 55–72.Google Scholar
Conlisk, J. 1989. Three Variants on the Allais Example. American Economic Review 79: 392–407.Google Scholar
Conly, S. 2013. Against Autonomy: Justifying Coercive Paternalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Curley, S. P., and Yates, F. J.. 1989. An Empirical Evaluation of Descriptive Models of Ambiguity Reactions in Choice Situations. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 33: 397–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. 2004 [1879]. The Descent of Man. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M.. 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. and Ryan, R.. 2000. The ‘What’ and ‘Why’ of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Enquiry 11: 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R. and Ryan, R. M.. 1999. A Meta-Analytical Review of Experiments Examining the Effects of Extrinsic Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation. Psychological Bulletin 125: 627–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekel, E. 1986. An Axiomatic Characterization of Preferences under Uncertainty: Weakening the Independence Axiom. Journal of Economic Theory 40: 304–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Health and Human Services. 2008. Premier Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration: Rewarding Superior Quality Health Care. Washington DC: HSS.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. 2010. The Age of Empathy: Nature’s Lessons for a Kinder Society. London: Souvenir Press.Google Scholar
Diecidue, E., and Wakker, P. P.. 2001. On the Intuition of Rank-Dependent Utility. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 23: 281–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diener, E., Wirtz, D. and Oishi, S.. 2001. End Effects of Rated Life Quality: The James Dean Effect. Psychological Science 12: 124–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilnot Report. 2011. Fairer Care Funding: The Report of the Commission on Funding of Care and Support. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Disney, K., Le Grand, J. and Atkinson, G.. 2013. From Irresponsible Knaves to Responsible Knights for Just 5p: Behavioural Public Policy and the Environment. In: Oliver, A. (ed.). Behavioural Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, P., and Kahneman, D.. 2008. Interpretations of Utility and Their Implications for the Valuation of Health. Economic Journal 118: 215–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doran, T., Fullwood, C., Gravelle, H., Reeves, D., Kontopantelis, E., Hiroeh, U. and Roland, M.. 2006. Pay-for-Performance Programs in Family Practices in the United Kingdom. New England Journal of Medicine 355: 375–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Economist. 2012. Nudge Nudge, Think Think. 24 March 24.Google Scholar
Edwards, W. 1955. The Prediction of Decisions among Bets. Journal of Experimental Psychology 50: 201–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Einhorn, H. J., and Hogarth, R. M.. 1986. Decision Making under Ambiguity. Journal of Business 59: S225–S250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellsberg, D. 1961. Risk, Ambiguity and the Savage Axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics 75: 643–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E., and Gächter, S.. 2000. Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments. American Economic Review 90: 980–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E., and Fischbacher, U.. 2005. The Economics of Strong Reciprocity. In: Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R. and Fehr, E. (eds.). Moral Sentiments and Material Interest: The Foundation of Cooperation in Economic Life. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, pp. 151–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E., Gächter, S. and Kirchsteiger, G.. 1997. Reciprocity as a Contract Enforcement Device: Experimental Evidence. Econometrica 65: 833–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, B. 2010. Ending on a High Note: Adding a Better End to Effortful Study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 36: 1548–1553.Google ScholarPubMed
Fong, C. M., Bowles, S. and Gintis, H.. 2005. Reciprocity and the Welfare State. In: Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., and Fehr, E. (eds.). Moral Sentiments and Material Interest: The Foundation of Cooperation in Economic Life. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, pp. 277–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, P. 1967. The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect. Oxford Review 5: 1–7.Google Scholar
Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J., Savin, E. and Sefton, M.. 1994. Replicability, Fairness and Pay in Experiments with Simple Bargaining Games. Games and Economic Behavior 6: 347–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G. and O’Donoghue, T.. 2002. Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review. Journal of Economic Literature 40: 351–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L. 2000. Extracting Meaning From Past Affective Experiences: The Importance of Peaks, Ends, and Specific Emotions. Cognition and Emotion 14: 577–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L., and Kahneman, D.. 1993. Duration Neglect in Retrospective Evaluations of Affective Episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65: 44–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frey, B. S. 2001. Inspiring Economics: Human Motivation in Political Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, B. S., and Oberholzer-Gee, F.. 1997. The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out. American Economic Review 87: 746–55.Google Scholar
Friedman, M., and Savage, L. J.. 1948. The Utility of Choices Involving Risk. Journal of Political Economy 56: 279–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genovesi, A. 2005 [1765–67]. Delle Lezioni di Commercio o sia di Economia Civile. Napoli: Instituto Italiano per gli Studi Filofící.Google Scholar
Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R. and Fehr, E. (eds.). 2005. Moral Sentiments and Material Interest: The Foundation of Cooperation in Economic Life. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gneezy, U., and Rustichini, A.. 2000. A Fine is a Price. The Journal of Legal Studies 29: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gneezy, U., and Rustichini, A.. 2000b. Pay Enough or Don’t Pay at All. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115: 791–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez, R., and Wu, G.. 1999. On the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function. Cognitive Psychology 38: 129–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, L. W., Wilson, A. L. and Lavato, C. Y.. 1986. What Changes Can Health Promotion Achieve and How Long Do These Changes Last? The Trade-Offs Between Expediency and Durability. Preventive Medicine 15: 508–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grether, D. M., and Plott, C. R.. 1979. Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon. American Economic Review 69: 623–638.Google Scholar
Guthrie, C. 2003. Prospect Theory, Risk Preference, and the Law. Northwestern University Law Review 97: 1115–1163.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Halpern, D. 2015. Inside the Nudge Unit: How Small Changes Can Make a Big Difference. London: WH Allen.Google Scholar
Hausman, D. M. 2015. Valuing Health: Well-Being, Freedom and Suffering. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 114.Google Scholar
Henrich, J. 2000. Does Culture Matter in Economic Behaviour: Ultimatum Game Bargaining Among the Machiguenga of the Peruvian Amazon. American Economic Review 90: 973–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, N., and Henrich, J.. 2007. Why Humans Cooperate: A Cultural and Evolutionary Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Héritier, A., and Lehmkuhl, D.. 2008 The Shadow of Hierarchy and New Modes of Governance. Journal of Public Policy 28: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershey, J. C., and Schoemaker, P. J. H.. 1980. Prospect Theory’s Reflection Hypothesis: A Critical Examination. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 25: 395–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershey, J. C., and Schoemaker, P. J. H.. 1985. Probability Versus Certainty Equivalence Methods in Utility Measurement: Are They Equivalent? Management Science 31: 1213–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heukelom, F. 2012. A Sense of Mission: The Alfred P. Sloan and Russell Sage Foundations’ Behavioral Economics Program, 1984–1992. Science in Context 25: 263–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House of Lords. 2011. Behaviour Change. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Hsee, C. K., and Abelson, R. P.. 1991. Velocity Relation: Satisfaction as a Function of the First Derivative of Outcome Over Time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60: 341–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsee, C. K., Abelson, R. P. and Salovey, P.. 1991. The Relative Weighting of Position and Velocity in Satisfaction. Psychological Science 2: 263–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, J., Payne, J. W. and Puto, C.. 1982. Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research 9: 90–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. 2004 [1739]. A Treatise of Human Nature. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1975 [1742]. Of the Independency of Parliament. In: Green, T. H., and Gross, T. H. (eds.). Essays, Moral, Political and Literary, Volume 1. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1983 [1777]. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Institute of Medicine. 1999. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health Care System. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Institute of Medicine. 2001. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Johannesson, M., Pliskin, J. S. and Weinstein, M. C.. 1994. A Note on QALYs, Time Tradeoff, and Discounting. Medical Decision Making 14: 188–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
John, P., Cotterill, S., Moseley, A., Richardson, L., Smith, G., Stoker, G. and Wales, C.. 2011. Nudge, Nudge, Think, Think: Experimenting with Ways to Change Civic Behaviour. London: Bloomsbury Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, E. J., and Schkade, D. A.. 1989. Bias in Utility Assessments: Further Evidence and Explanations. Management Science 35: 406–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kacelnik, A. 1998. Normative and Descriptive Models of Decision Making: Time Discounting and Risk Sensitivity. In: Oaksford, M., and Chater, N. (eds.). Rational Models of Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 54–70.Google Scholar
Kacelnik, A., and El Mouden, C.. 2013. Triumphs and Trials of the Risk Paradigm. Animal Behaviour 86: 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, D. M. 2005. The Logic of Reciprocity: Trust, Collective Action, and Law. In: Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R. and Fehr, E. (eds.). Moral Sentiments and Material Interest: The Foundation of Cooperation in Economic Life. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, pp. 339–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A.. 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica 47: 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A. (eds.). 1982. Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L. and Thaler, R. H.. 1986. Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics. Journal of Business 59: s285–s300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L. and Thaler, R.. 1990. Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coarse Theorem. Journal of Political Economy 98: 1325–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., Fredrickson, B. L., Schreiber, C. A. and Redelmeier, D. A.. 1993. When More Pain is Preferred to Less: Adding a Better End. Psychological Science 4: 401–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P. and Sarin, R.. 1997. Back to Bentham? Explorations of Expected Utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 375–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, R. L., Johnson, P. E., Town, R. J. and Butler, M.. 2004. A Structured Review of the Effect of Economic Incentives on Consumers’ Preventive Behavior. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 27: 327–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelman, M. 2005. Hedonic Psychology and the Ambiguities of ‘Welfare’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 33: 391–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan, pp. 161–162.Google Scholar
Layard, R. 2005. Happiness: Lessons From a New Science. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Le Grand, J. 1997. Knights, Knaves or Pawns? Human Behaviour and Social Policy. Journal of Social Policy 26: 149–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Grand, J. 2003. Motivation, Agency, and Public Policy: Of Knights & Knaves, Pawns & Queens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenstein, S., and Slovic, P.. 1971. Reversals of Preference Between Bids and Choices in Gambling Decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 89: 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenstein, S., and Slovic, P.. 1973. Response-Induced Reversals of Preference in Gambling: An Extended Replication in Las Vegas. Journal of Experimental Psychology 101: 16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindman, H. R. 1971. Inconsistent Preferences among Gambles. Journal of Experimental Psychology 89: 390–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewenstein, G., and Prelec, D.. 1993. Preferences for Sequences of Outcomes. Psychological Review 100: 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewenstein, G., Asch, D. A., Friedman, J. Y., Melichar, L. A. and Volpp, K. G.. 2012. Can Behavioral Economics Make Us Healthier? BMJ 344: e3482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loomes, G. C., and Sugden, R.. 1982. Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty. Economic Journal 92: 805–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loomes, G. C., and Sugden, R.. 1986. Disappointment and Dynamic Consistency in Choice under Uncertainty. Review of Economic Studies 53: 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loomes, G. C., Starmer, C. and Sugden, R.. 1989. Preference Reversal: Information Processing Effect or Rational Nontransitive Choice? Economic Journal 99: 140–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loomes, G. C., Starmer, C. and Sugden, R.. 1991. Observing Violations of Transitivity by Experimental Methods. Econometrica 59: 425–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowndes, V., and Skelcher, C.. 1998. The Dynamics of Multi-Organizational Partnerships: An Analysis of Changing Modes of Governance. Public Administration 76: 313–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCrimmon, K. R., and Larsson, S.. 1979. Utility Theory: Axioms Versus Paradoxes. In: Allais, M. and Hagen, O. (eds.). Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 27–145.Google Scholar
Machina, M. J. 1989. Choice Under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved. In: Hey, J. D. (ed.). Current Issues in Microeconomics. Basingstoke: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Malotte, C. K., Ledsky, R., Hogben, M., Larro, M., Middlestadt, S., St. Lawrence, J. S., Olthoff, G., Settlage, R. H., Van Devanter, N. L. and the GCAP Study Group. 2004. Comparison of Methods to Increase Repeat Testing in Persons Treated for Gonorrhea and/or Chlamydia at Public Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinics. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 31: 637–642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marglin, S. A. 1963. The Social Rate of Discount and the Optimal Rate of Investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 77: 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowitz, H. 1952. The Utility of Wealth. Journal of Political Economy 60: 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marschak, J. 1950. Rational Behaviour, Uncertain Prospects, and Measurable Utility. Econometrica 18: 111–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marteau, T. M., Ogilvie, D., Roland, M., Suhrcke, M. and Kelly, M. P.. 2011. Judging Nudging: Can Nudging Improve Population Health? BMJ 342: d228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mauss, M. 1954. The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
McDaid, D., Oliver, A. and Merkur, S.. 2014. What Do We Know About the Strengths and Weakness of Different Policy Mechanisms to Influence Health Behaviour in the Population? Policy summary, 15. WHO Regional Office for Europe. Copenhagen: Denmark.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1873. Autobiography. London: Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer.Google Scholar
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. 2011. Towards Better Health. The Hague: Klutworks.Google Scholar
Oullier, O., and Sauneron, S. (eds.). 2010. Improving Public Health Prevention with Behavioural, Cognitive and Neuroscience. Paris: Centre D’Analyse Strategique.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. 1971. Manual of Political Economy. Translated by Schwier, A. S. New York: August Kelley.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Paul-Ebhohimhen, V., and Avenell, A.. 2007. Systematic Review of the Use of Financial Incentives in Treatments for Obesity and Overweight. Obesity Reviews 9: 355–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pigou, A. C. 1932. The Economics of Welfare. 4th Edition. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pikkety, T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, R. 2006. From Gift Relationships to Quasi-markets: An Odyssey along the Policy Paths of Altruism and Egoism. Social Policy & Administration 40: 10–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. 2002 [1957]. The Poverty of Historicism. New York: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. 1963. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Preston, M. G., and Baratta, P.. 1948. An Experimental Study of the Auction-Value of an Uncertain Outcome. The American Journal of Psychology 61: 183–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabin, M. 2013. Healthy Habits: Some Thoughts on the Role of Public Policy in Healthful Eating and Exercise Under Limited Rationality. In: Oliver, A. (ed.). Behavioural Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 115–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rae, J. 1895. Life of Adam Smith. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Raiffa, H. 1961. Risk, Ambiguity and the Savage Axioms: Comment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 75: 690–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. 1928. A Mathematical Theory of Saving. The Economic Journal 38: 543–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rand, A. 2007. The Fountainhead. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Read, D., and van Leeuwen, B.. 1998. Predicting Hunger: The Effects of Appetite and Delay on Choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76: 189–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Read, D., Loewenstein, G. and Kalyanaraman, S.. 1999. Mixing Virtue and Vice: Combining the Immediacy Effect and the Diversification Heuristic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 12: 257–273.3.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redelmeier, D. A., and Kahneman, D.. 1996. Patient’s Memories of Painful Medical Treatments – Real-Time and Retrospective Evaluations of Two Minimally Invasive Procedures. Pain 66: 3–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redelmeier, D. A., Katz, J. and Kahneman, D.. 2003. Memories of Colonoscopy: A Randomized Trial. Pain 104: 187–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenthal, M. B., and Frank, R. G.. 2006. What Is the Empirical Basis for Paying for Quality in Health Care? Medical Care Research and Review 63: 135–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samuelson, P. 1937. A Note on Measurement of Utility. Review of Economic Studies 4: 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P. 1952. Probability, Utility, and the Independence Axiom. Econometrica 20: 670–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, L. J. 1954. The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Schmeidler, D., and Wakker, P.. 1990. Expected Utility and Mathematical Expectation. In: Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. (eds.). The New Palgrave. Utility and Probability. New York: Macmillan Press, pp. 70–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreiber, C. A., and Kahneman, D.. 2000. Determinants of the Remembered Utility of Aversive Sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129: 27–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seal, K. H., Kral, A. H., Lorvick, J., McNees, A., Gee, L. and Edlin, B. R.. 2003. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Monetary Incentives versus Outreach to Enhance Adherence to the Hepatitis B Vaccine Series among Injection Drug Users. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 71: 127–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Sethi, R., and Somanathan, E.. 2005. Norm Compliance and Strong Reciprocity. In: Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R. and Fehr, E. (eds.). Moral Sentiments and Material Interest: The Foundation of Cooperation in Economic Life. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, pp. 242–243.Google Scholar
Shaw, J. 2007. Is It Acceptable for People to be Paid to Adhere to Medication? No. BMJ 335: 233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, H. A. 1956. Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment. Psychological Review 63: 129–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silk, J. B. 2005. The Evolution of Cooperation in Primate Groups. In: Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R. and Fehr, E. (eds.). Moral Sentiments and Material Interest: The Foundation of Cooperation in Economic Life. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, pp. 43–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, J. S., Henly, G. A., Ha, C. N., Malone, M. E., Nyman, J. A., Diaz, S. and McGovern, P. G.. 2005. Effect of Direct Mail as a Population-Based Strategy to Increase Mammography Use among Low-Income Underinsured Women Ages 40 to 64 Years. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers, and Prevention 14: 2346–2352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slovic, P., and Lichtenstein, S.. 1968. Relative Importance of Probabilities and Payoffs in Risk Taking. Journal of Experimental Psychology 78: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slovic, P., and Lichtenstein, S.. 1983. Preference Reversals: A Broader Perspective. American Economic Review 73: 596–605.Google Scholar
Slovic, P., and Tversky, A.. 1974. Who Accepts Savage’s Axiom? Behavioral Science 19: 368–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. 2009 [1759]. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1999 [1776]. The Wealth of Nations, Book 1. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Solow, R. M. 1974. The Economics of Resources or the Resources of Economics. American Economic Review 64: 1–14.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., and West, R. F.. 2000. Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23: 645–726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, N. 2007. The Economics of Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugden, R. 1992. How People Choose. In: Hargreaves Heap, S., Hollis, M., Lyons, B., Sugden, R. and Weale, A. (eds.). The Theory of Choice: A Critical Guide. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 36–50.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. 2009. On Nudging. A Review of Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness by Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein. International Journal of the Economics of Business 16: 365–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. 2013. Simpler: The Future of Government. London: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Tanenbaum, S. J. 2009. Pay-for-Performance in Medicare: Evidentiary Irony and the Politics of Value. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 34: 717–746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thaler, R. H. 1994. The Winner’s Curse: Paradoxes and Anomalies of Economic Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. 2015. Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioural Economics. New York: Penguin Random House.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H., and Sunstein, C. R.. 2003. Libertarian Paternalism. The American Economic Review 93: 175–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H., and Sunstein, C. R.. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Titmuss, R. 1970. The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. London: New Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. 2009. Why We Cooperate. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T. and Moll, H.. 2005. Understanding and Sharing Intentions: The Origins of Cultural Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28: 675–691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D.. 1974. Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Biases in Judgments Reveal Some Heuristics of Thinking under Uncertainty. Science 185: 1124–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D.. 1981. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science 211: 453–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D.. 1992. Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5: 297–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., Sattath, S. and Slovic, P.. 1988. Contingent Weighting in Judgement and Choice. Psychological Review 95: 371–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., Slovic, P. and Kahneman, D.. 1990. The Causes of Preference Reversals. American Economic Review 80: 204–217.Google Scholar
UK Treasury. 2003. The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government. London: TSO.Google Scholar
Volpp, K. G., Troxel, A. B., Pauly, M. V., Glick, H. A., Puig, A., Asch, D. A., Galvin, R., Zhu, J., Wan, F., DeGuzman, J., Corbett, E., Weiner, J. and Audrain-McGovern, J.. 2009. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Financial Incentives for Smoking Cessation. New England Journal of Medicine 360: 699–709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Volpp, K. G., John, L. K., Troxel, A. B., Norton, L., Fassbender, J. and Loewenstein, G.. 2008. Financial Incentive-Based Approaches for Weight Loss. A Randomized Trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 300: 2631–2637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O.. 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wehrung, D. A. 1989. Risk Taking over Gains and Losses: A Study of Oil Executives. Annals of Operations Research 19: 115–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, G.S. 1984. Reciprocal Food Sharing in the Vampire Bat. Nature 308: 181–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 2015. World Development Report 2015: Mind, Society and Behavior. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Zabell, S.L. 1990. Daniel Bernoulli. In: Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. (eds.). The New Palgrave. Utility and Probability. New York: Macmillan Press, pp. 12–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Adam Oliver, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Book: The Origins of Behavioural Public Policy
  • Online publication: 24 May 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108225120.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Adam Oliver, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Book: The Origins of Behavioural Public Policy
  • Online publication: 24 May 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108225120.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Adam Oliver, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Book: The Origins of Behavioural Public Policy
  • Online publication: 24 May 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108225120.012
Available formats
×