Book contents
- Investigation of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
- Diagnostic Pediatric Pathology
- Investigation of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Section 1 The History of SIDS
- Section 2 The Parents
- Section 3 Legal Framework
- Section 4 Best Practices Protocols of Investigation of Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy and Childhood
- Section 5 Autopsy Findings
- Section 6 Epidemiology and Risk Factors
- Section 7 Pathophysiology
- Section 8 SUDI/SUID Which is Not SIDS
- Index
- References
Section 3 - Legal Framework
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 June 2019
Book contents
- Investigation of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
- Diagnostic Pediatric Pathology
- Investigation of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Section 1 The History of SIDS
- Section 2 The Parents
- Section 3 Legal Framework
- Section 4 Best Practices Protocols of Investigation of Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy and Childhood
- Section 5 Autopsy Findings
- Section 6 Epidemiology and Risk Factors
- Section 7 Pathophysiology
- Section 8 SUDI/SUID Which is Not SIDS
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Investigation of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome , pp. 19 - 42Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
References
Officially ‘Custos Placitorum Coronae’ or ‘Keepers of the Pleas of the Crown’.Google Scholar
It was as late as 1846 that coroners lost the power to order forfeiture to the Crown of an object involved in a death, such as a railway locomotive.Google Scholar
A power that was not abolished until 1977.Google Scholar
R (Middleton) v. West Somerset Coroner [2004] United Kingdom House of Lords 10.Google Scholar
Section 41 Births and Deaths Registration Act 1953 as amended by the Still Birth Definition Act, 1992.Google Scholar
R (T) v. HM Senior Coroner for West Yorkshire [2017] England and Wales Court of Appeal (EWCA )Civ 318.Google Scholar
R v. Inner N. London Coroner ex p Touche [2001] EWCA Civ 383.Google Scholar
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/working-together-to-safeguard-children--2 (accessed 30 October 2018).Google Scholar
www.gov.uk/government/publications/child-death-overview-panels-contacts (accessed 4 October 2018).Google Scholar
Worcestershire CC v. Worcestershire LSCB and HM Coroner Worcestershire [2013] England and Wales High Court 1711.Google Scholar
R v. Inner West London Coroner ex p Dallaglio (1994) 4 All ER 139.Google Scholar
R v. HM Coroner for Western District of E. Sussex ex p Homberg (1994) 158 JP 357.Google Scholar
www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/guidance-no-17-conclusions.pdf at para 52 (accessed 4 February 2018).Google Scholar
References
Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy; A Multi-agency Protocol for Care and Investigation. London: Royal College of Pathologists, Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. 2004; https://www.rcpath.org and https://www.rcpch.ac.uk/ (accessed 30 October 2018).Google Scholar
Vaughan, J. Infanticide: The Effects of Miscarriages of Justice. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
ACPO. A Guide to Investigating Child Deaths, 2014; library.college.police.uk/docs/acpo/ACPO-guide-to-investigating-child-deaths-2014.doc (accessed 27 September 2018).Google Scholar
Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy and Childhood: Multi-agency Guidelines for Care and Investigation, 2nd edn. London: The Royal College of Pathologists, 2016.Google Scholar
Mayes, A Brown, Marshall, D, ‘Risk Factors for inter-familial, unlawful, and suspicious child deaths’. Journal of Homicide, and Major Incident Investigation, 2010; 6(1):77–96.Google Scholar
References
New Jersey State Medical Examiner Act, 2009. New Jersey Code Title 52 - State Government, Departments And Officers; 52:17B https://law.justia.com/codes/new-jersey/2009/title-52/52-17b (accessed 30 October 2018).Google Scholar
Jentzen, JM. Death Investigation in America: Coroners, Medical Examiners, and the Pursuit of Medical Certainty. Boston: Harvard University Press, 2009: 10–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohr, JC. Doctors and the Law: Medical Jurisprudence in Nineteenth-Century America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996: 226–36.Google Scholar
The Office of the Medical Examiner of the City of New York: Report by the Committee on Public Health, New York Academy of Medicine. Bull NY Acad Med, 1967; 43(3):241–9; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1806568/pdf/bullnyacadmed00252-0085.pdf (accessed 30 October 2018).Google Scholar
Melinek, J et al. NAME position paper: medical examiner, coroner and forensic pathologist independence. Acad Forensic Pathol, 2013; 3(1):93–8.Google Scholar
www.cdc.gov/sids/index.htm (accessed 30 October 2018).Google Scholar
Gill, JR, Andrew, T, Gilliland, LJ, Matshes, EW, Reichard, R. NAME position paper: Recommendations for the postmortem assessment of suspected head trauma in children and young infants. Acad Forensic Pathol, 2013; 4(2):206–13.Google Scholar
Pinneri, K, Matshes, EWl. Recommendations for the autopsy of an infant who has died suddenly and unexpectedly. Acad Forensic Pathol, 2017; 7(2):171–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Govtrack. S.1745 – An Act to Provide Financial Assistance for Research Activities for the Study of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, and for Other Purposes. 93rd Congress (1973–4) https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/93/s1745 (accessed 30 October 2018).Google Scholar
NAME Position statement in support of repealing certain religious exemption laws 2 March 2001; https://netforum.avectra.com/public/temp/ClientImages/NAME/8aa04f55-b815-4a3f-bfaa-236f571379d3.pdf (accessed 5 November 2018).Google Scholar