Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T06:22:54.655Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter Ten - The Richelieu Effect

The Khodorkovsky Case and Political Interference with Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2018

Marina Kurkchiyan
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Agnieszka Kubal
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

During his first campaign for president in winter 2000, Vladimir Putin vowed to establish a “dictatorship of law” in Russia. Some observers interpreted that phrase hopefully, as a promise to bring back stability after a decade of social upheaval, state corruption, and private theft. But then, in October 2003, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, Russia’s wealthiest citizen, was arrested for various economic crimes. Many speculated that his fall was meant only to warn his fellow oligarchs that their Yeltsin-era wealth remained safe only so long as they stayed out of politics. Khodorkovsky paid the price for breaching that understanding. Under that interpretation his fate was perhaps unjust, but not broadly replicable. However, the techniques developed in his arrest, incarceration, trial, and sentencing turned out to be the model for an increasing number of subsequent cases. Successive dissidents, regime opponents, activists, and even additional oligarchs have been subject to the same modus operandi. This chapter explores the Khodorkovsky case for what it foretold about the Russian criminal justice system. The case shows that political intervention can and does manipulate the justice system to achieve predetermined outcomes, while nevertheless doing so under a veneer of formal legality.
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon (1744) A Select Collection of Singular and Interesting Histories. London.Google Scholar
Balmforth, T. (2013) ‘Critics of Khodorkovsky verdict in Kremlin crosshairs’, Radio Free Eur/Radio Liberty, 28 March, www.rferl.org/content/khodorkovsky-crime-trial/24940316.html.Google Scholar
BBC News (2007) ‘New fraud charges in Yukos case’, BBC News, 5 February.Google Scholar
Brown, A. (1996) The Gorbachev Factor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dawisha, K. (2014) Putin’s Kleptocracy: Who Owns Russia? New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Der Spiegel (2013b) ‘Bundesregierung verweigert Russland Kooperation im Fall Chodorkowski’, Der Spiegel, 20 October.Google Scholar
Der Spiegel (2013a) ‘Exiled economic advisor: “Putin is afraid of the public”’, Der Spiegel, 13 June.Google Scholar
Fournier, E. (1882) L’Esprit dans l’Histoire: Recherches et Curiosités sur les Mots Historiques. Paris: Dentu (4th edn).Google Scholar
Gel’man, V. (2015) Authoritarian Russia: Analyzing Post-Soviet Regime Changes. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorbachev, M. (1996) Memoirs. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Gridasov, A. and Petelin, H. (2012) ‘Yukos affair to be reconsidered: experts estimate Mikhail Khodorkovsky’s chances to be set free as slim’, Izvestia, 06 March (reproduced on Johnson’s Russia List, # 42).Google Scholar
Gsovski, V. (1948) Soviet Civil Law. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Law School.Google Scholar
Guriev, S. (2013) ‘Why I am not returning to Russia’, New York Times, 05 June.Google Scholar
Hamilton, A. (1788) ‘The Judiciary Department’, The Federalist # 78.Google Scholar
Hand, L. (1921) The Deficiencies of Trials to Reach the Heart of the Matter. New York: Lecture delivered before the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, 17 November.Google Scholar
Hand, L. (1926) 3 Lectures on Legal Topics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (2011) The Constitution of the Russian Federation: A Contextual Analysis. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Hoffman, D. E. (2011) The Oligarchs: Wealth and Power in the New Russia. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Interfax (2012a) ‘Putin says there is no political content in Khodorkovsky case’, Interfax, 07 March (reproduced on Johnson’s Russia List, # 43).Google Scholar
Interfax (2012b) ‘Экспертиза дела “ЮКОСа”’, Interfax, 01 April, www.interfax.ru/russia/238759.Google Scholar
Interfax (2012c) ‘Федотов о заявлении СК РФ по экспертизе дела ЮКОСа: “учите матчасть”’, Interfax, 01 April, www.interfax.ru/news.asp?id=238756.Google Scholar
Jackson, R. H. (1940–1941) ‘The federal prosecutor’, Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology, 31(1): 36.Google Scholar
Kahn, J. (1999) Federalism, Democratization, and the Rule of Law in Russia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, J. (2013a) ‘Freedom of expression in post-Soviet Russia’, Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs, 18.Google Scholar
Kahn, J. (2013b) ‘In Putin’s Russia, shooting the messenger’, New York Times, 25 February.Google Scholar
Kahn, J. (2011) ‘Report on the verdict against M. B. Khodorkovsky and P. L. Lebedev’, Journal of Eurasian Law, 4(3): 321332.Google Scholar
Kahn, J. (2010) ‘The rule-of-law factor’, in Newton, J. and Tompson, W. (eds.) Institutions, Ideas and Leadership in Russian Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 159183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, J. (2006) ‘The search for the rule of law in Russia’, Georgetown Journal of International Law, 37(2): 353409.Google Scholar
Kamisar, Y. (1965) ‘Equal justice in the gatehouses and mansions of American criminal procedure: from Powell to Gideon, from Escobedo to … ’, in Howard, A. E. R. (ed.) Criminal Justice in our Time. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2596.Google Scholar
Katkov, G. (1969) The Trial of Bukharin. New York: Stein and Day.Google Scholar
Kovalev, N. (2010) Criminal Justice Reform in Russia, Ukraine, and the Former Republics of the Soviet Union. Lampeter: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger, S. (Rapporteur) (2009) Document 11993, Report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights, 7 August, para. 99.Google Scholar
Linz, J. J. and Stepan, A. (1996) Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison, J. (aka Publius) (1788) ‘The structure of the government must furnish the proper checks and balances between the different departments’, The Federalist # 51.Google Scholar
Medvedev, R. A. (1971) Let History Judge: The Origins and Consequences of Stalinism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Muižnieks, N. (2013) ‘Report by the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe, following his visit to the Russian Federation from 3 to 12 April 2013’, CommDH(2013)21, 12 November, 42.Google Scholar
Nemtsova, A. (2010) ‘Ella Pamfilova: a “hopeless cause”’, Newsweek (International edition), 16 August.Google Scholar
Price, E. C. (1912) Cardinal de Richelieu. London: Methuen, 287289.Google Scholar
RIA-Novosti (2010) ‘Announcement of Khodorkovsky verdict postponed till Dec. 27’, Sputnik, 15 December.Google Scholar
RIA-Novosti (2012) ‘Kremlin experts deny taking Yukos money’, RIA-Novosti, 01 April, 10.44 pm, http://en.ria.ru/russia/20120401/172538752.html.Google Scholar
Roberts, P. (2011) ‘Does Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights require reasoned verdicts in criminal trials?Human Rights Law Review, 11(2): 213235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakwa, R. (2014) Putin and the Oligarch: The Khodorkovsky – Yukos Affair. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
Schwirtz, M. (2012) ‘Russian leader orders review of oil tycoon’s conviction’, New York Times, 06 March, A10.Google Scholar
Shevtsova, L. (2003) Putin’s Russia. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Sputnik International (2013) ‘Former Russian judge called in for questioning over Yukos’, Sputnik International, 25 June, http://sputniknews.com/russia/20130625/181853411/Former-Russian-Judge-Called-In-for-Questioning-Over-Yukos.html.Google Scholar
Subbotin, M. (2013) ‘Разбитые зеркала’, Gazeta.ru, 8 February.Google Scholar
Trechsel, S. (2005) Human Rights in Criminal Proceedings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Treisman, D. (2013) ‘Can Putin keep his grip on power?’, Current History, 112(756): 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, G. L. (2013) ‘Russia probes experts critical of oil baron trial’, Wall Street Journal, 31 May.Google Scholar
Zheleznova (2013) ‘Экспертов привлекли к делу ЮКОСа’, Ведомости (Vedomosti), 30 May.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×