Ackrill, J. L. 1963. Aristotle’s Categories and De Interpretatione: Translated with Notes, Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anagnostopoulos, A. 2013. ‘Aristotle’s Parmenidean Dilemma’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 95: 245–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aquinas, T. 1963. Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics, trans. Blackwell, R. J., Spath, R. J. and Thirkel, W. E., New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Aquinas, T. 1985. Sentencia libri De sensu et sensato, cuius secundus tractatus est De memoria et reminiscencia (Sancti Thomae de Aquino Opera Omnia 45, 2), Rome and Paris: VrinGoogle Scholar

Averroes, . 1962. Commentarium Magnum in Aristotelis De Physico Audito libri octo, in Aristotelis Opera cum Averrois Commentariis, Frankfurt am Main: Minerva, 14 vols. [Venetiis: Junctas, 1562–74], vol. IVGoogle Scholar

Badawī, A. (ed.) 1964–5. Arisṭūṭālīs. Al-Ṭabī‘a. Tarǧamat Isḥāq Ibn Ḥunayn ma‘a šurūḥ Ibn al-Samḥ wa Ibn ‘Adī wa Mattā Ibn Yūnus wa Abū al-Faraǧ Ibn al-Ṭayyib, Cairo: al-Dār al-Qawmiyya li al-Ṭibā‘a wa al-Našr, 2 vols.Google Scholar

Baltussen, H., Mueller, I., Atkinson, M. and Share, M. 2012. Simplicius on Aristotle Physics I. 5–9, London: BloomsburyGoogle Scholar

Barnes, J. 1979. ‘Parmenides and the Eleatic One’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 61: 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, J. 1994. Aristotle, Posterior Analytics, 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Barnes, J. 1995. ‘Metaphysics’, in The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle, ed. Barnes, J., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 66–108Google Scholar

Barney, R. 2012. ‘History and dialectic (Metaphysics A 3, 983a24–984b8)’, in Aristotle’s Metaphysics Alpha: Symposium Aristotelicum, ed. Steel, C., Oxford: Oxford University Press: 69–104Google Scholar

Berti, E. 1969. ‘Physique et métaphysique selon Aristote: Phys. I 2, 184b25–185a5’, in Naturphilosophie bei Aristoteles und Theophrast, ed. Düring, I., Heidelberg: Lothar Stiehm Verlag: 18–31Google Scholar

Bogen, J. 1991. ‘Aristotelian contrariety’, Topoi 10: 53–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bogen, J. 1992. ‘Contrariety and change in Aristotle’, Phronesis 37: 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bogen, J. and McGuire, J. E. 2006. ‘Aristotle on motion, change, and predication’, in Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, eds. Bosley, R. N. and Panayides, C. Y., Nicosia: University of Nicosia Press: 1–32Google Scholar

Bolton, R. 1991. ‘Aristotle’s method in natural science: Physics I’, in Aristotle’s Physics: A Collection of Essays, ed. Judson, L., Oxford: Clarendon Press: 1–29Google Scholar

Bostock, D. 1982. ‘Aristotle on the principles of change’, in Language and Logos: Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy Presented to G. E. L. Owen, eds. Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M. C., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 179–96Google Scholar

Bostock, D. 2006a. ‘Aristotle on the principles of change in Physics I’, in Space, Time, Matter and Form: Essays on Aristotle’s Physics, ed. Bostock, D., Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bostock, D. 2006b. ‘Aristotle on the Eleatics in Physics I.2–3’, in Space, Time, Matter, and Form: Essays on Aristotle’s Physics, ed. Bostock, D., Oxford: Oxford University Press: 103–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broadie, S. (forthcoming). ‘Physics I.9’, in Aristotle’s Physics I, Symposium Aristotelicum, eds. Ierodiakonou, K., Kalligas, P. and Karasmanis, V., Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Brunschwig, J. 2004. ‘On Generation and Corruption I.1: a false start?’, in Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption, Book I: Symposium Aristotelicum, eds. De Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J., Oxford: Oxford University Press: 25–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burnyeat, M. 2001. A Map of Metaphysics Zeta, Pittsburgh: Mathesis PublicationsGoogle Scholar

Burnyeat, M. 2011. ‘Episteme’, in Episteme etc.: Essays in Honour of Jonathan Barnes, eds. Morison, B. and Ierodiakonou, K., Oxford: Oxford University Press: 3–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castelli, L. M. 2010. Problems and Paradigms of Unity: Aristotle’s Accounts of the One, Sankt Augustin: Academia VerlagGoogle Scholar

Castelli, L. M. 2018. Aristotle, Metaphysics Ι: A Translation and Commentary, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Cerami, C. 2005. ‘La sostanza sensibile e la nozione di tode toionde in Metafisica VII 8’, in Eidos-Idea: Platone, Aristotele e la tradizione platonica, eds. Fronterotta, F. and Leszl, W., Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag: 211–32Google Scholar

Cerami, C. 2009. ‘Thomas D’Aquin lecteur critique du Grand Commentaire d’Averroès à Phys. I,1’, Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 19: 189–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cerami, C. 2012. ‘Mélange: Minima Naturalia et croissance animale dans le Commentaire moyen d’Averroès à De Generatione et Corruption I,5, in La nature et le vide dans la physique médiévale, eds. Biard, J. and Rommevaux, S., Turnhout: Brepols: 137–64Google Scholar

Cerami, C., 2015. Génération et substance: Aristote et Averroès entre physique et métaphysique, Berlin: W. de GruyterGoogle Scholar

Charles, D. 2003. ‘Prime matter and elemental change’, in Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption, Book I: Symposium Aristotelicum, eds. de Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J., Oxford: Oxford University Press: 151–69Google Scholar

Charles, D. 2008. ‘Aristotle’s psychological theory’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium 24: 1–30Google Scholar

Charles, D. 2010. ‘Metaphysics Θ. 7 and 8: some issues concerning actuality and potentiality’, in Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle, eds. Lennox, J. G. and Bolton, R., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 168–97Google Scholar

Charlton, W. 1970. Aristotle: Physics Books I and II, Translated with Introduction and Notes, Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Charlton, W. 1992. Aristotle: Physics Books I and II, Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Cherniss, H. 1935. Aristotle’s Criticism of Presocratic Philosophy, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar

Cherniss, H. 1944. Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato and the Academy, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar

Clarke, T. 2015. ‘Aristotle and the ancient puzzle about coming to be’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 49: 129–50Google Scholar

Code, A. 1976a. ‘The persistence of Aristotelian matter’, Philosophical Studies 93: 357–67Google Scholar

Code, A. 1976b. ‘Aristotle’s response to Quine’s objections to modal logic’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 5: 159–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coxon, A. H. 2009. The Fragments of Parmenides: A Critical Text with Introduction, Translation, the Ancient Testimonia and a Commentary, rev. and expanded edn., Las Vegas: Parmenides PublishingGoogle Scholar

Crubellier, M. (forthcoming). ‘Physics I.2’, in Aristotle’s Physics I, Symposium Aristotelicum, eds. Ierodiakonou, K., Kalligas, P. and Karasmanis, V., Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Curd, P. 2004. The Legacy of Parmenides: Eleatic Monism and Later Presocratic Thought, rev. paperback edn, Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing [Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998]Google Scholar

de Haas, F. 1998. ‘Philoponus on Theophrastus on composition in nature’, in Theophrastus: Reappraising the Sources, eds. van Ophuijsen, J. M. and van Raalte, M. (Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities), New Brunswick, NJ, and London: Transaction: 171–89.Google Scholar

Diels, H. 1912. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, griechisch und deutsch, Berlin: WeidmannGoogle Scholar

Dillon, J. M. 2003. The Heirs of Plato: A Study of the Old Academy, Oxford: Clarendon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, M. J. 1994. Philoponus on Aristotle’s Physics 3, Ithaca: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar

Falcon, A. 2005. Aristotle and the Science of Nature: Unity without Uniformity, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falcon, A. 2012. ‘The reception of Aristotle’s study of animal motion in the Latin world’, Documenti e Studi sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 22: 521–39Google Scholar

Falcon, A. 2016. ‘The subject matter of Aristotle’s Physics’, in Soma: Körperkonzepte und körperliche Existenz in der antiken Philosophie und Literatur, eds. Buchheim, T., Meissner, D. and Wachsmann, N., Hamburg: Felix Mainer Verlag: 423–36Google Scholar

Ferguson, J. 1969. ‘The opposites’, Apeiron 3: 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frede, M. 1987. ‘The unity of general and special metaphysics: Aristotle’s conception of metaphysics’, in Frede, M., Essays in Ancient Philosophy, Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press: 81–95Google Scholar

Furley, D. J. 1967. Two Studies in the Greek Atomists, Princeton: Princeton University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furley, D. J. 1989. ‘Anaxagoras in Response to Parmenides’, in Furley, D. J., Cosmic Problems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 47–65Google Scholar

Furley, D. J. 1992. ‘From Anaxagoras to Socrates’, in The Philosophy of Socrates, vol. II: Elenchus, Ethics, and Truth, ed. Boudouris, K., Athens: International Center for Greek Philosophy and Culture: 74–80Google Scholar

Furley, D. J. 2002. ‘Anaxagoras, Plato, and the Naming of Parts’, in Presocratic Philosophy: Festschrift for A. P. D. Mourelatos, eds. Caston, V. and Graham, D., Aldershot: Ashgate: 119–26Google Scholar

Gershenson, D. and Greenberg, D. 1962. ‘Aristotle confronts the Eleatics: two arguments on “the One”’, Phronesis 7: 137–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giardina, G. 2002. I fondamenti della fisica: analisi critica di Aristotele, Phys. I, Catania: CUEMGoogle Scholar

Gill, M. L. 2012. Philosophos: Plato’s Missing Dialogue, Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gotthelf, A. 2012. Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology, Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graham, D. W. 1994. ‘The postulates of Anaxagoras’, Apeiron 27: 77–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gregoric, P. 2006. ‘Quantities and contraries: Aristotle’s Categories 6, 5b11–6a18’, Apeiron 39: 341–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haack, S. 1978. Philosophy of Logics, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hackforth, R. 1972. Plato’s Philebus, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Hardie, R. P. and Gaye, R. K. 1930. ‘Physica’, in The Works of Aristotle Translated into English, ed. Ross, W. D., vol. II, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Harriman, B. 2015. ‘The beginning of Melissus’ On Nature, Or On What-Is: a reconstruction’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 135: 19–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horstschäfer, T. M. 1998. ‘Über Prinzipien’: Eine Untersuchung zur methodischen und inhaltlichen Geschlossenheit des ersten Buches der Physik des Aristoteles, Berlin and New York: W. de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Husik, I. 1952. Philosophical Essays: Ancient, Medieval and Modern, eds. Nahm, M. C. and Strauss, L., Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar

Ibn al-Nadīm, , 1871–2. Kitāb al-Fihrist, mit Anmerkungen herausgegeben von G. Flügel, nach dessen Tode besorgt von J. Roediger und A. Müller, Leipzig: Vogel, 2 vols.Google Scholar

Ibn al-Nadīm, , 1970. The Fihrist of al-Nadīm: A Tenth-Century Survey of Muslim Culture, trans. Dodge, B., New York and London: Columbia University Press, 2 vols.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. and Wolf, R. 2013. Aristotle: Eudemian Ethics (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy), Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Irwin, T. H. 1988. Aristotle’s First Principles, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Jones, B. 1974. ‘Aristotle’s introduction of matter’, Philosophical Review 83: 474–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judson, L. (forthcoming). Aristotle: Metaphysics Λ: A Translation and Commentary, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Katz, E. C. 2008. ‘A Question of Numbers: Aristotle’s Critique of Platonic Mathematical Objects, Form-Numbers, and First Principles in “Metaphysics” M-N’, available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global: Order No. 3303019Google Scholar

Kelsey, S. 2006. ‘Aristotle Physics I 8’, Phronesis 51: 330–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelsey, S. 2008. ‘The place of I 7 in the argument of Physics I’, Phronesis 53: 180–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelsey, S. 2010. ‘Hylomorphism in Aristotle’s Physics’, Ancient Philosophy 30: 107–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelsey, S. 2015. ‘Aristotle on interpreting nature’, in Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide, ed. Leunissen, M., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 31–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenny, A. 2011. Aristotle, The Eudemian Ethics: A New Translation, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Keynes, J. N. 1894. Studies and Exercises in Formal Logic, 3rd edn, London and New York: MacmillanGoogle Scholar

Laas, E. 1836. Aristotelische Textes-Studien, Berlin: ReimerGoogle Scholar

Laks, A. 1998. ‘Le début d’une physique: ordre, extension et nature des fragments 142/144 A/B de Théophraste’, in Theophrastus: Reappraising the Sources, eds. van Ophuijsen, J. M. and van Raalte, M. (Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities), New Brunswick, NJ, and London: Transaction: 143–63Google Scholar

Lederman, H. 2014. ‘ho pote on esti and coupled entities: a form of explanation in Aristotle’s natural philosophy’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 46: 109–64Google Scholar

Lefebvre, D. 2008. ‘L’usage de la série des contraires en Métaphysique Γ 2, 1004b27–1005a6’, in Aristote: Métaphysique Gamma, eds. Hecquet-Devienne, M. and Stevens, A., Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters: 287–321Google Scholar

Lemmon, E. J. 1965. Beginning Logic, London: NelsonGoogle Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2008. ‘“As if we were investigating snubness”: Aristotle on the prospects for a single science of Nature’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 35: 149–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lettinck, P. 1994. ‘Problems in Aristotle’s Physics I, 1 and their discussion by Arab commentators’, Journal for the History of Arabic Sciences 10: 89–109Google Scholar

Lewis, F. A. 2008. ‘What’s the matter with prime matter?’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 34: 123–46Google Scholar

Lewis, F. A. 2013. How Aristotle Gets By in Metaphysics Zeta, Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 1966. Polarity and Analogy: Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Loux, M. J. 1992. ‘Aristotle and Parmenides: an interpretation of Physics A8’, Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 8: 281–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansfeld, J. 1986. ‘Aristotle, Plato, and the Preplatonic doxography and chronology’, in Storiografia e dossografia nella filosofia antica, ed. Cambiano, G., Turin: Tirrenia: 1–59Google Scholar

Mansion, A. 1945. Introduction à la Physique aristotélicienne, 2nd edn, Louvain: Éditions de l’institut supérieurGoogle Scholar

Mansion, S. 1953. ‘Aristote, critique des Éléates’, Revue philosophique de Louvain 51: 165–86Google Scholar

Mansion, S., ed. 1961. Aristotle et les problèmes de méthode, Louvain and Paris: Publications universitaires de Louvain et éditions Béatrice–NeuwelaertsGoogle Scholar

Mansion, S. 1984. ‘Le role de l’exposé et de la critique des philosophies antèrieures chez Aristote’, in Études aristotéliciennes, ed. Mansion, S., Louvain: Éditions de l’institut supérieur: 55–76Google Scholar

Mates, B. 1965. Elementary Logic, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Matthews, G. B. 1972. ‘Senses and kinds’, Journal of Philosophy 69: 149–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menn, S. 1995. ‘Metaphysics, dialectic and the Categories’, Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 100: 311–37Google Scholar

Menn, S. (n.d.) ‘Physics II and its relation to Physics I–IV’, unpublished paperGoogle Scholar

Menn, S. (forthcoming). ‘Physics I.1’, in Aristotle’s Physics I, Symposium Aristotelicum, eds. Ierodiakonou, K., Kalligas, P. and Karasmanis, V., Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Mignucci, M. 2007. ‘Aristotle on the existential import of propositions’, Phronesis 52: 121–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mourelatos, A. P. D. 2008. The Route of Parmenides, rev. and expanded edn, Las Vegas: Parmenides PublishingGoogle Scholar

Osborne, C. 2009. Philoponus on Aristotle’s Physics I. 4–9, London: DuckworthGoogle Scholar

Owen, G. E. L. 1960. ‘Eleatic questions’, Classical Quarterly 10: 84–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palmer, J. 2003. ‘On the alleged incorporeality of what is in Melissus’, Ancient Philosophy 23: 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palmer, J. 2004. ‘Melissus and Parmenides’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 26: 19–54Google Scholar

Palmer, J. 2009. Parmenides and Presocratic Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pellegrin, P. 1994. ‘Aristote et la physique éléate’, in Passion des formes: dynamique qualitative, sémiophysique et intelligibilité, ed. Thom, R., Fontenay-St. Cloud: ENS Éditions: 121–37Google Scholar

Pellegrin, P. 2002. Aristote, Physique, 2nd edn, Paris: FlammarionGoogle Scholar

Peramatzis, M. 2011. Priority in Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peters, F. E. 1968. Aristoteles Arabus, Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar

Quarantotto, D. 2005. Causa finale, sostanza, essenza in Aristotele, Naples: BibliopolisGoogle Scholar

Quarantotto, D. 2016. ‘Aristotle’s way away from Parmenides’ way: a case of scientific controversy and ancient humour’, Elenchos 36: 209–28Google Scholar

Quarantotto, D. 2017. L’Universo senza spazio. Aristotele e la teoria del luogo, Naples: BibliopolisGoogle Scholar

Quarantotto, D. (forthcoming). ‘Physics I 3’, in Aristotle’s Physics I, Symposium Aristotelicum, eds. Ierodiakonou, K., Kalligas, P. and Karasmanis, V., Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Rashed, M. 2005. Aristote: De la génération et la corruption, Paris: Les Belles LettresGoogle Scholar

Ross, W. D. 1936. Aristotle. Physics: A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary, Oxford: Clarendon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, W. D. 1951. Plato’s Theory of Ideas, Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Rossi, G. 2006. ‘Desanuadando argomentos: las aplicaciones filosoficas de la dialéctica segùn las Refutaciones Sofìsticas’, Méthexis 19: 79–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rossi, G. 2014. ‘Aristotle on untying arguments’, in Zur modernen Deutung der aristotelischen Logik, eds. Öffenberger, N. and Vigo, A., Hildesheim: Olms, vol. XI: 105–40Google Scholar

Rowe, C. J. 1999. Plato: Statesman, Indianapolis and Cambridge, MA: HackettGoogle Scholar

Sayre, K. 2005. Plato’s Late Ontology: A Riddle Resolved, Las Vegas: Parmenides PublishingGoogle Scholar

Schofield, M. 1980. An Essay on Anaxagoras, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Schramm, M. 1962. Die Bedeutung der Bewegungslehre des Aristoteles für seine beiden Lösungen der zenonischen Paradoxie, Frankfurt am Main: KlostermannGoogle Scholar

Sharples, R. W. 1992. Alexander of Aphrodisias, Quaestiones 1.1–2.15, London: DuckworthGoogle Scholar

Sharples, R. W. 1998. Theophrastus of Eresus, Commentary, Vol. 3.1: Sources on Physics, Leiden and New York: BrillGoogle Scholar

Simplicius, , 1882. In Aristotelis Physica, ed. Diels, H., Berlin: ReimerGoogle Scholar

Simpson, P. L. P. 2013. The Eudemian Ethics of Aristotle, New Brunswick, NJ, and London: TransactionGoogle Scholar

Sorabji, R. 2012. ‘Introduction’, in Simplicius: On Aristotle Physics 1.5–9, trans. Baltussen, H., Atkinson, M., Share, M. and Mueller, I., London: BloomsburyGoogle Scholar

Stevens, A. 2012. Aristote, La physique, Nouvelle traduction annotée, Paris: VrinGoogle Scholar

Stokes, M. C. 1971. One and Many in Presocratic Philosophy, Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic StudiesGoogle Scholar

Tannery, P. 1930. Pour l’histoire de la science hellène, 2nd edn, Paris: Gauthier-VillarsGoogle Scholar

Tarán, L. 1965. Parmenides: A Text with Translation, Commentary, and Critical Essays, Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Taylor, A. E. 1928. A Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Todd, R. B. 2012. Themistius on Aristotle Physics 1–3, London: Bristol Classical PressGoogle Scholar

Van Melsen, A. G. 1960. From Atomos to Atom, New York: Harper & BrothersGoogle Scholar

Vitelli, H. 1887–8. Philoponus in Aristotelis Physica Commentaria, Berlin: ReimerGoogle Scholar

Vlastos, G. 1950. ‘The physical theory of Anaxagoras’, Philosophical Review 59: 31–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wagner, H. 1967. Aristoteles: Physikvorlesung, Berlin: Akademie VerlagGoogle Scholar

Waterlow, S. 1982. Nature, Change, and Agency in Aristotle’s Physics: A Philosophical Study, Oxford: Clarendon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wicksteed, P. and Cornford, F. M. 1934. Aristotle: The Physics, Books I–V, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Wieland, W. 1970. Die aristotelische Physik, 2nd edn, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht; trans. into Italian as La fisica di Aristotele, Bologna: Il Mulino, 1993Google Scholar

Wieland, W. 1975. ‘Aristotle’s Physics and the problem of inquiry into principles’, in Articles on Aristotle, vol. I: Science, eds. Barnes, J., Schofield, M. and Sorabji, R., London: Duckworth: 127–40; also ed., ‘Das Problem der Prinzipienforschung und die aristotelische Physik’, Kant-Studien 52 (1960–1): 206–19Google Scholar

Wieland, W. 1992. Die aristotelische Physik, 3rd edn, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Williams, C. J. F. 1982. Aristotle’s De Generatione et Corruptione: Translated with Notes, Oxford: Clarendon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar