Book contents
- Operating Room Leadership and Perioperative Practice Management
- Operating Room Leadership and Perioperative Practice Management
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword 1
- Foreword 2
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Section 1 Leadership and Strategy
- Section 2 Economic Considerations, Efficiency, and Design
- Section 3 Surgical and Anesthesia Practice Management
- Section 4 Nursing
- Section 5 Safety, Standards, and Information Technology
- 30 The Joint The Joint Commission, CMS, and Other Standards
- 31 Procedural Sedation
- 32 Medical Informatics in the Perioperative Period
- 33 Simulation as a Tool to Improve Patient Safety
- 34 Education in Operating Room Management
- 35 Organizations Dedicated to and Current Overview of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
- 36 Checklist Utility in the Perioperative Care Environment
- 37 Anesthesiology Disaster Management and Emergency Preparedness
- 38 Novel Technology for Patient Engagement
- Index
- References
36 - Checklist Utility in the Perioperative Care Environment
from Section 5 - Safety, Standards, and Information Technology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 November 2018
Book contents
- Operating Room Leadership and Perioperative Practice Management
- Operating Room Leadership and Perioperative Practice Management
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword 1
- Foreword 2
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Section 1 Leadership and Strategy
- Section 2 Economic Considerations, Efficiency, and Design
- Section 3 Surgical and Anesthesia Practice Management
- Section 4 Nursing
- Section 5 Safety, Standards, and Information Technology
- 30 The Joint The Joint Commission, CMS, and Other Standards
- 31 Procedural Sedation
- 32 Medical Informatics in the Perioperative Period
- 33 Simulation as a Tool to Improve Patient Safety
- 34 Education in Operating Room Management
- 35 Organizations Dedicated to and Current Overview of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
- 36 Checklist Utility in the Perioperative Care Environment
- 37 Anesthesiology Disaster Management and Emergency Preparedness
- 38 Novel Technology for Patient Engagement
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Operating Room Leadership and Perioperative Practice Management , pp. 341 - 347Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Catchpole, KR, et al. (2007). Patient handover from surgery to intensive care: Using Formula 1 pit-stop and aviation models to improve safety and quality. Paediatr Anaesth, 17 (5), 470–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, BM, et al. (2007). Six Sigma methodology can be used to improve adherence for antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Anesth Analg, 104 (1), 140–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillespie, BM, et al. (2014). Effect of using a safety checklist on patient complications after surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesthesiology, 120 (6), 1380–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
www.jointcommission.org/standards_information/up.aspx (accessed November 25, 2016).Google Scholar
www.who.int/patientsafety/safesurgery/ss_checklist/en/ (accessed November 25, 2016).Google Scholar
World Alliance for Patient Safety. (2009). WHO Surgical Safety Checklist. World Health Organization. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44186/2/9789241598590_eng_Checklist.pdf (accessed November 25, 2016).Google Scholar
de Vries, EN, et al. (2009). Development and validation of the SURgical PAtient Safety System (SURPASS) checklist. Qual Saf Health Care, 18(2), 121–6.Google Scholar
de Vries, EN, et al. (2010). The SURgical PAtient Safety System (SURPASS) checklist optimizes timing of antibiotic prophylaxis. Patient Saf Surg, 4(1), 6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
deVries, EN, et al. (2011). Prevention of surgical malpractice claims by use of a surgical safety checklist. Ann Surg, 253(3), 624–8.Google Scholar
Treadwell, JR, Lucas, S. Preoperative checklists and anesthesia checklists. In: Making Health Care Safer II: An Updated Critical Analysis of the Evidence for Patient Safety Practices. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2013. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK133353/ (accessed November 25, 2016).Google Scholar
de Vries, EN, et al. (2012). Nature and timing of incidents intercepted by the SURPASS checklist in surgical patients. BMJ Qual Saf., 21(6), 503–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ASA Committee on Equipment and Facilities. 2008 Recommendations for Pre-anesthesia Checkout Procedures. Park Ridge, IL: American Society of Anesthesiologists, 2008. www.asahq.org/resources/clinical-information/2008-asa-recommendations-for-pre-anesthesia-checkout (accessed November 25, 2016).Google Scholar
American Society of Anesthesiologists. Standards for basic anesthetic monitoring. October 25, 2005. www.asahq.org/publicationsAndServices/standards/02.pdf (accessed November 25, 2016).Google Scholar
Piekarski, F, et al. (2015). Quality of handover in a pediatric postanesthesia care unit. Paediatr Anaesth, 25(7), 746–52.Google Scholar
Pucher, PH, et al. (2015). Effectiveness of interventions to improve patient handover in surgery: A systematic review. Surgery, 158(1), 85–95.Google Scholar
Greenberg, CC, et al. (2007). Patterns of communication breakdowns resulting in injury to surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg, 204(4), 533–40.Google Scholar
Milby, A, et al. (2014). Quality of post-operative patient handover in the post-anaesthesia care unit: A prospective analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 58(2), 192–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Segall, N, et al. (2012). Can we make postoperative patient handovers safer? A systematic review of the literature. Anesth Analg, 115(1), 102–15.Google Scholar
Boat, AC, et al. (2013). Handoff checklists improve the reliability of patient handoffs in the operating room and postanesthesia care unit. Paediatr Anaesth, 23(7), 647–54.Google Scholar
Salzwedel, C, et al. (2013). The effect of a checklist on the quality of post-anaesthesia patient handover: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Qual Health Care, 25(2), 176–81.Google Scholar
Byrnes, MC, et al. (2009). Implementation of a mandatory checklist of protocols and objectives improves compliance with a wide range of evidence-based intensive care unit practices. Crit Care Med, 37(10), 2775–81.Google Scholar
Petrovic, MA, et al. (2012). Pilot implementation of a perioperative protocol to guide operating room-to-intensive care unit patient handoffs. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 26(1), 11–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Urbach, DR, et al. (2014). Introduction of surgical safety checklists in Ontario, Canada. N Engl J Med, 370(11), 1029–38.Google Scholar
Borchard, A, et al. (2012). A systematic review of the effectiveness, compliance, and critical factors for implementation of safety checklists in surgery. Ann Surg, 256(6), 925–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manser, T, et al. (2010). Assessing the quality of patient handoffs at care transitions. Qual Saf Health Care, 19(6), e44.Google Scholar
van Rensen, EL, et al. (2012). Multitasking during patient handover in the recovery room. Anesth Analg, 115(5), 1183–7.Google Scholar
Nagpal, K, et al. (2010). Postoperative handover: Problems, pitfalls, and prevention of error. Ann Surg, 252(2), 171–6.Google Scholar
de Vries, EN, et al. (2010). Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes. N Enl J Med, 363(20), 1928–37.Google Scholar
Agawala, AV, et al. (2015). An electronic checklist improves transfer and retention of critical information at intraoperative handoff of care. Anesth Analg, 120(1), 96–104.Google Scholar