Book contents
- The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques, Second Edition
- Reviews
- The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Medical Image Perception
- Part I Historical Reflections and Theoretical Foundations
- Part II Science of Image Perception
- Part III Perception Metrology
- 14 Designing Perception Experiments
- 15 Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis: Basic Concepts and Practical Applications
- 16 Multireader ROC Analysis
- 17 Memory Effects and Experimental Design
- 18 Observer Models as a Surrogate to Perception Experiments
- 19 Implementation of Observer Models
- 20 Value and Limitations of Observer Models
- Part IV Clinical Performance Assessment
- Part V Computational Perception
- Part VI Applied Perception
- Index
- References
17 - Memory Effects and Experimental Design
from Part III - Perception Metrology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 December 2018
Book contents
- The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques, Second Edition
- Reviews
- The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Medical Image Perception
- Part I Historical Reflections and Theoretical Foundations
- Part II Science of Image Perception
- Part III Perception Metrology
- 14 Designing Perception Experiments
- 15 Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis: Basic Concepts and Practical Applications
- 16 Multireader ROC Analysis
- 17 Memory Effects and Experimental Design
- 18 Observer Models as a Surrogate to Perception Experiments
- 19 Implementation of Observer Models
- 20 Value and Limitations of Observer Models
- Part IV Clinical Performance Assessment
- Part V Computational Perception
- Part VI Applied Perception
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques , pp. 263 - 275Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Allard, F., Graham, S., Paarsalu, M.E., et al. (1980). Perception in sport: basketball. J Sport Psychol, 2(1), 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alloway, T.P., Alloway, R.G. (2010). Investigating the predictive roles of working memory and IQ in academic attainment. J Exp Child Psychol, 106, 20–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, M.C. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. J Exp Psychol Learn, 20(5), 1063.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A.D. (2007). Working Memory, Thought, and Action (Vol. 45). Oxford, UK: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A.D., Hitch, G.J. (2000). Development of working memory: should the Pascual-Leone and the Baddeley and Hitch models be merged? J Exp Child Psychol, 77(2), 128–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A.D., Hitch, G.J. (2017). Is the levels of processing effect language-limited? J Mem Lang, 92, 1–13.Google Scholar
Balassy, C. (2005). Flat-panel display (LCD) versus high-resolution gray-scale display (CRT) for chest radiography: an observer preference study. Am J Roentgenol, 184(3), 752–756.Google Scholar
Brady, T.F., Konkle, T., Alvarez, G.A. (2008). Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 105, 14325–14329.Google Scholar
Brady, T.F., Konkle, T., Alvarez, G.A., et al. (2011). A review of visual memory capacity: beyond individual items and toward structured representations. J Vision, 11(5), 4, 1–34.Google Scholar
Chase, W.G., Ericsson, K.A. (1982). Skill and working memory. Psychol Learn Motiv, 16, 1–58.Google Scholar
Chase, W.G., Simon, H.A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cogn Psychol, 4(1), 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, M.A., Evans, K.K., Horowitz, T.S., et al. (2011). Auditory and visual memory in musicians and nonmusicians. Psychonom B Rev, 18(3), 586–591.Google Scholar
Daneman, M., Carpenter, P.A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. J Verb Learn Verb B, 19, 450–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Hoop, B., De Boo, D.W., Gieterna, H.A., et al. (2010). Computer-aided detection of lung cancer on chest radiographs: effect on observer performance. Radiology, 257(2), 532–540.Google Scholar
de Smet, A.A., Norris, M.A., Yandow, D.R., et al. (1993). Diagnosis of meniscal tears of the knee with MR imaging: effect of observer variation and sample size on sensitivity and specificity. Am J Roentgenol, 160, 555–559.Google Scholar
de Vries, A.H., Venema, H.W., Florie, J., et al. (2008). Influence of tagged fecal material on detectability of colorectal polyps at CT: phantom study. Am J Roentgenol, 2008, W181–W189.Google Scholar
Evans, K.K., Cohen, M.A., Tambouret, R., et al. (2011). Does visual expertise improve visual recognition memory? Atten Percept Psychophys, 73(1), 30–35.Google Scholar
Evans, K.K., Haygood, T.M., Cooper, J., et al. (2016a). A half-second glimpse often lets radiologists identify breast cancer cases even when viewing the mammogram of the opposite breast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 113(37), 10292–10297.Google Scholar
Evans, K.K., Marom, E.M., Godoy, M.C.B., et al. (2016b). Radiologists remember mountains better than radiographs, or do they? J Med Imag, 3(1), 011005.Google Scholar
Frey, P.W., Adesman, P. (1976). Recall memory for visually presented chess positions. Mem Cognit, 4(5), 541–547.Google Scholar
Fuhrman, C.R., Britton, C.A., Bender, T., et al. (2002). Observer performance studies: detection of single versus multiple abnormalities of the chest. Am J Roentgenol, 179, 1551–1553.Google Scholar
Fukuda, K., Vogel, E.K., Mayr, U., et al. (2010). Quantity not quality: the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory capacity. Psychonom B Rev, 17, 673–679.Google Scholar
Gardiner, J.M. (2001). Episodic memory and autonoetic consciousness: a first–person approach. Philos T R Soc B, 356(1413), 1351–1361.Google Scholar
Good, W.F., Sumkin, J.H., Dash, N., et al. (1999). Observer sensitivity to small differences: a multipoint rank-order experiment. Am J Roentgenol, 175, 275–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardesty, L.A., Ganott, M.A., Hakim, C.M., et al. (2005). “Memory effect” in observer performance studies of mammograms. Acad Radiol, 12(3), 286–290.Google Scholar
Haygood, T.M., Ryan, J., Liu, M.A.Q., et al. (2012). Image recognition and consistency of response. Proc SPIE 8318, Medical Imaging 2012: Image perception, observer performance, and technology assessment.Google Scholar
Haygood, T.M., Liu, M.A.Q., Galvan, E.M., et al. (2013). Memory for previously viewed radiographs and the effect of prior knowledge of memory task. Acad Radiol, 10, 1598–1603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J.M. (2003). Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends Cogn Sci, 7(11), 498–504.Google Scholar
Hillard, A., Myles-Worsley, M., Johnston, W., et al. (1985). The development of radiologic schemata through training and experience: a preliminary communication. Invest Radiol, 18, 422–425.Google Scholar
Hollingworth, A. (2005). The relationship between online visual representation of a scene and long-term scene memory. J Exp Psychol Learn, 31, 396–411.Google Scholar
Hollingworth, A., Henderson, J.M. (2003). Testing a conceptual locus for the inconsistent object change detection advantage in real-world scenes. Mem Cognit, 31, 930–940.Google Scholar
Isola, P., Xiao, J., Parikh, D., et al (2014). What makes a photograph memorable? IEEE T Pattern Anal, 36(7), 1469–1482.Google Scholar
Jolicoeur, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Mem Cognit, 13(4), 289–303.Google Scholar
Kallergi, M., Pianou, N., Georgakopoulos, A., et al (2012). Quantitative evaluation of the memory bias effect in ROC studies with PET/CT. Proc SPIE, 8318, 83180D1-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandel, E.R., Schwartz, J.H., Jessell, T.M., et al. (2000). Principles of Neural Science, Vol. 4. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 1227–1246.Google Scholar
Kane, M.J., Bleckley, M.K., Conway, A.R.A., et al. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. J Exp Psychol Gen, 130, 169–183.Google Scholar
Kim, A.Y., Cho, K.S., Song, K., et al. (2001). Urinary calculi on computed radiography: comparison of observer performance with hard-copy versus soft-copy images on different viewer systems. Am J Roentgenol, 177(2), 331–335.Google Scholar
Konkle, T., Brady, T.F., Alvarez, G.A., et al. (2010). Scene memory is more detailed than you think: the role of categories in visual long-term memory. Psychol Sci, 21, 1551–1556.Google Scholar
Koutstaal, W. (2003). Older adults encode – but do not always use – perceptual details: intentional versus unintentional effects of detail on memory judgments. Psychol Sci, 14(2), 189–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landauer, T.K. (1986). How much do people remember? Some estimates of the quantity of learned information in long-term memory. Cogn Sci, 10(4), 477–493.Google Scholar
Lewandowsky, S. (2014). Implicit Memory: Theoretical Issues. New York, NY: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meisamy, S., Bolan, P.J., Baker, E.H., et al. (2005). Adding in vivo quantitative 1H MR spectroscopy to improve diagnostic accuracy of breast MR imaging: preliminary results of observer performance study at 4.0 T. Radiology, 236, 465–467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mervis, C.B., Rosch, E. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. Annu Rev Psychol, 32(1), 89–115.Google Scholar
Metz, C.E. (1989). Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol, 24, 234–245.Google Scholar
Reiner, B.I., Krupinski, E. (2012). The insidious problem of fatigue in medical imaging practice. J Digit Imag, 25(1), 3–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, J.T., Haygood, T.M., Yamal, J., et al. (2011). The “memory effect” for repeated radiologic observations. Am J Roentgenol, 197, W985–W991.Google Scholar
Schacter, D.L. (1993). Implicit memory: a selective review. Annu Rev Neurosci, 16(1), 159–182.Google Scholar
Schacter, D.L., Tulving, E. (1994). What are the memory systems of 1994? In: Schacter, D.L., Tulving, E. (eds.) Memory Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shepard, R.N. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. J Verb Learn Verb B, 6, 156–163.Google Scholar
Shiffrin, R.M., Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM – retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonom B Rev, 4(2), 145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, L.R. (1989). On the course of forgetting in very long-term memory. J Exp Psychol Learn, 15(2), 241.Google Scholar
Taylor-Phillips, S., Elze, M.D., Krupinski, E.A., et al. (2015). Retrospective review of the drop in observer detection performance over time in lesion-enriched experimental studies. J Digit Imag, 28(1), 32–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tchou, P.M., Haygood, T.M., Atkinson, E.N., et al. (2010). Interpretation time of computer-aided detection at screening mammography. Radiology, 257, 40–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tulving, E. (2000). Concepts of memory. In: The Oxford Handbook of Memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulving, E. (2002). Episodic memory: from mind to brain. Annu Rev Psychol, 53(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Vogt, S., Magnussen, S. (2007). Expertise in pictorial perception: eye-movement patterns and visual memory in artists and laymen. Perception, 36(1), 91–100.Google Scholar
Voss, J.F., Vesonder, G.T., Spilich, G.J., et al. (1980). Text generation and recall by high-knowledge and low-knowledge individuals. J Verb Learn Verb B, 19(6), 651–667.Google Scholar
Wiseman, S., Neisser, U. (1974). Perceptual organization as a determinant of visual recognition memory. Am J Psychol, 87, 675–681.Google Scholar