Book contents
- Assessing the World Trade Organization: Fit for Purpose?
- Assessing the World Trade Organization
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Part I Introduction and Setting the Stage
- Part II New Insight from the Early Times
- Part III General Trends and Patterns in WTO Dispute Settlement
- Part IV Zooming in on Specific Debates
- 9 Twenty Years of Third-Party Participation at the WTO
- 10 Mind the Gap
- 11 The Age of Innocence
- Part V Interactions Within and Across Regimes
- Index
- References
10 - Mind the Gap
Navigating Between the WTO Agreement and Its Accession Protocols
from Part IV - Zooming in on Specific Debates
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 May 2017
By
Book contents
- Assessing the World Trade Organization: Fit for Purpose?
- Assessing the World Trade Organization
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Part I Introduction and Setting the Stage
- Part II New Insight from the Early Times
- Part III General Trends and Patterns in WTO Dispute Settlement
- Part IV Zooming in on Specific Debates
- 9 Twenty Years of Third-Party Participation at the WTO
- 10 Mind the Gap
- 11 The Age of Innocence
- Part V Interactions Within and Across Regimes
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Assessing the World Trade OrganizationFit for Purpose?, pp. 223 - 275Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Arato, Julian. 2013. ‘Treaty Interpretation and Constitutional Transformation: Informal Change in International Organizations’. Yale J. Int’l L. 38: 289–357.Google Scholar
Baroncini, Elisa. 2013. ‘The Applicability of GATT Article XX to China’s WTO Accession Protocol in the Appellate Body Report of the China – Raw Materials Case: Suggestions for a Different Interpretive Approach’. China-EU L.J. 1 (3): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrisch, George M. 1991. ‘The Establishment of New Law Through Subsequent Practice in GATT’. N.C.J. Int’l L. & Com. Reg. 16: 497.Google Scholar
Bronckers, Marco and Maskus, Keith E. 2014. ‘China – Raw Materials: A Controversial Step Towards Evenhanded Exploitation of Natural Resources’. World Trade Review 13 (2): 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartland, Michel, Depayre, Gérard, and Woznowski, Jan. 2012. ‘Is Something Going Wrong in the WTO Dispute Settlement?’ J. World Trade 46 (5): 979–1015, at 1006.Google Scholar
Charnovitz, Steve. 2008. ‘Mapping the Law of WTO Accession’. In The WTO: Governance, Dispute Settlement & Developing Countries, edited by Janow, Merit E., Donaldson, Victoria and Yanovich, Alan, 855–920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Charnovitz, Steve and Hoekman, Bernard. 2013. ‘US – Tyres, Upholding a WTO Accession Contract – Imposing Pain for Little Gain’. World Trade Review 12 (2): 273–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, Richard K. 2007. Treaty Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 204.Google Scholar
Gu, Bin. 2012. ‘Applicability of GATT Article XX in China – Raw Materials: A Clash within the WTO Agreement’. J. Int’l Econ. L. 15 (4) 1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Matthew. 2013. ‘The Integration of Accession Protocols into the WTO Agreement’. J. World Trade 47 (1): 45–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milhaupt, Curtis J. and Zheng, Wentong. 2015. ‘Beyond Ownership: State Capitalism and the Chinese Firm’. Georgetown Law J. 103 (3): 665–722.Google Scholar
Nolte, Georg. 2013. ‘Reports for the ILC Study Group on Treaties Over Time’. In Treaties and Subsequent Practice, edited by Nolte, Georg. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 169.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Bernard. 2015. ‘The EU Does Not Have to Make China a Market Economy in 2016’. www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=c13fe452-8e29-40d5-87d9-bc792daf15a7Google Scholar
Oliver, Christian, Donnan, Shawn and Mitchell, Tom. 2015. ‘US Warns Europe over Granting Market Economy Status to China’. Financial Times 28 December 2015.Google Scholar
Parenti, Antonio. 2000. ‘Accession to the World Trade Organisation: A Legal Analysis’. Legal Issues of Economic Integration 27 (2): 141–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost. 2003. Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law, 356–357. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost. 2010. ‘Case Note, Squaring Free Trade in Culture with Chinese Censorship: The WTO Appellate Body Report on China – Audiovisuals’. Melbourne Journal of International Law 11 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Price, Alan H., Brightbill, Timothy C. and Nance, D. Scott. 2015. ‘China Can Still Be Treated as a Nonmarket Economy After 2016’. www.wileyrein/publication/159_China-Can-Still-Be-Treated-As-A-Nonmarket-Economy-After-2016.pdfGoogle Scholar
Qin, Julia Y. 2003. ‘“WTO-Plus” Obligations and Their Implications for the WTO Legal System: An Appraisal of the China Accession Protocol’. J. World Trade 37 (3): 483–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, Julia Y. 2004. ‘WTO Regulation of Subsidies to State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) – A Critical Appraisal of the China Accession Protocol’. J. Int’l Econ. L. 7 (4): 863–919, at 899–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, Julia Y. 2011. ‘Pushing the Limits of Global Governance: Trading Rights, Censorship and WTO Jurisprudence – A Commentary on the China – Publications Case’. Chinese J. Int’l L. 10 (2): 271–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, Julia Y. 2012a. ‘Reforming WTO Discipline on Export Duties: Sovereignty over Natural Resources, Economic Development and Environmental Protection’. J. World Trade 46 (5): 1147–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, Julia. Y. 2012b. ‘Editorial Comments, The Predicament of China’s “WTO-Plus” Obligation to Eliminate Export Duties: A Commentary on the China – Raw Materials Case’. Chinese J. Int’l L. 11 (2): 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, Julia Y. 2015. ‘The Conundrum of WTO Accession Protocols: In Search of Legality and Legitimacy’. Virginia J. Int’l L. 55 (2) 369–450.Google Scholar
Roessler, Frieder. 2011. ‘Comment, Appellate Body Ruling in China – Publications and Audiovisual Products’. 10 World Trade Review 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyagi, Mitali. 2012. ‘Flesh on a Legal Fiction: Early Practice in the WTO on Accession Protocols’. J. Int’l Econ. L. 15: 391–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Trade Organization. 1999. The Legal Texts: The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by