Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:01:47.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

25 - Birth Order and Evolutionary Psychology

from Part VI - Evolution and Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2020

By
Frank J. Sulloway
Edited by
Lance Workman ,
Will Reader  and
Jerome H. Barkow
Lance Workman
Affiliation:
University of South Wales
Will Reader
Affiliation:
Sheffield Hallam University
Jerome H. Barkow
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia
Get access

Summary

Birth order has long been thought to have a lasting influence on people’s lives through its effects on social customs and by fostering individual differences in personality and social behavior. Historically, birth order has been linked with well-documented differences in professional opportunities and achievement, emigration patterns, likelihood of reproduction, mortality rates, inheritance practices, and the politics of royal succession (Altus, 1966; Boone, 1986; Bu, 2016; Duby, 1977; Galton, 1874; Herlihy, 1977; Hrdy & Judge, 1993; Sulloway, 1996). An analysis of birth order and the social customs in 39 non-Western societies found that firstborns generally receive more extensive birth ceremonies than do their younger siblings, are allotted special privileges, and, even in adulthood, exert authority over their brothers and sisters (Rosenblaat & Skoogberg, 1974). Additionally, firstborns in these 39 societies received a greater share of parental property than did laterborns.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behavior , pp. 299 - 310
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, A. (1927). Understanding Human Nature. New York: Greenberg.Google Scholar
Adler, A. (1928). Characteristics of the first, second, and third child. Children, 3, 14–52.Google Scholar
Altus, W. D. (1966). Birth order and its sequelae. Science, 151, 44–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Argys, L. M., Rees, D. I., Averett, S. L., & Witoonchart, B. (2005). Birth order and risky adolescent behavior. Economic Inquiry, 44, 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barclay, K. J., & Kolk, M. (2015). Birth order and mortality: A population-based cohort study. Demography, 52, 613–639.Google Scholar
Barni, D., Roccato, M., Vieno, A., & Alfieri, S. (2014). Birth order and conservatism: A multilevel test of Sulloway’s “born to rebel” thesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 58–63.Google Scholar
Baskett, L. M. (1985). Sibling status: Adult expectations. Developmental Psychology, 21, 441–445.Google Scholar
Beck, E., Burnet, K. L., & Vosper, J. (2006). Birth-order effects on facets of extraversion. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 953–959.Google Scholar
Beer, J., & Horn, J. M. (2000). The influence of rearing order on personality development within two adoption cohorts. Journal of Personality, 68, 789–819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belmont, L., & Marolla, F. A. (1973). Birth order, family size, and intelligence. Science, 182, 1096–1101.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1997). Birth order and sibling sex ratio in homosexual versus heterosexual males and females. Annual Review of Sex Research, 8, 27–67.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (2004). Quantitative and theoretical analyses of the relation between older brothers and homosexuality in men. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 230, 173–187.Google Scholar
Bleske-Rechek, A., & Kelley, J. A. (2014). Birth order and personality: A within-family test using independent self-reports from both firstborn and laterborn siblings. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 15–18.Google Scholar
Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the Five-Factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boone, J. L. (1986). Parental investment and elite family structure in preindustrial states: A case study of late medieval-early modern Portuguese genealogies. American Anthropologist, 88, 859–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brim, O. G. Jr. (1958). Family structure and sex role learning by children: A further analysis of Helen Koch’s data. Sociometry, 21, 1–16.Google Scholar
Bu, F. (2016). Examining sibling configuration effects on young people’s educational aspiration and attainment. Advances in Life Course Research, 27, 69–79.Google Scholar
Carette, B., Anseel, F., & Van Yperen, N. W. (2011). Born to learn or born to win? Birth order effects on achievement goals. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 500–503.Google Scholar
Clark, C., & Clark, J. (2008). Women at the Polls: The Gender Gap, Cultural Politics, and Contested Constituencies in the United States. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Clark, R. D., & Rice, G. A. (1982). Family constellations and eminence: The birth orders of Nobel Prize winners. Journal of Psychology, 110, 281–287.Google Scholar
Claxton, R. (1994). Empirical relationships between birth order and two types of parental feedback. Psychological Record, 44, 475–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Courtiol, A., Raymond, M., & Faurie, C. (2009). Birth order affects behaviour in the investment game: Firstborns are less trustful and reciprocate less. Animal Behaviour, 78, 1405–1411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Damian, R. I., & Roberts, B. W. (2015). The associations of birth order with personality and intelligence in a representative sample of U.S. high school students. Journal of Research in Personality, 58, 96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. (1859). On The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Dixon, M. M., Reyes, C. J., Leppert, M. F., & Pappas, L. M. (2008). Personality and birth order in large families. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 119–128.Google Scholar
Downey, D. (2001). Number of sibling and intellectual development: The resource dilution explanation. American Psychologist, 56, 497–504.Google Scholar
Drummond, H., & García-Chevelas, C. (1989). Food shortage influences sibling aggression in the blue-footed booby. Animal Behavior, 37, 806–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duby, G. (1977). The Chivalrous Society, trans. by C. Poston. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ernst, C., & Angst, J. (1983). Birth Order: Its Influence on Personality. Berlin/New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429–456.Google Scholar
Førland, T. E., Korsvik, T. R., & Christophersen, K-A. (2012). Brought up to rebel in the sixties: Birth order irrelevant, parental worldview decisive. Political Psychology, 33, 825–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freese, J., Powell, B., & Steelman, L. C. (1999). Rebel without a cause or effect: Birth order and social attitudes. American Sociological Review, 64, 207–231.Google Scholar
Galton, F. (1874). English Men of Science. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior. Parts 1 and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–16; 17–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. R. (1998). The Nurture Assumption: Why Children Turn Out the Way They Do. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Harris, J. R. (2000). Context-specific learning, personality, and birth order. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 174–177.Google Scholar
Healey, M., & Ellis, B. (2007). Birth order, conscientiousness, and openness to experience: Tests of the family-niche model of personality using a within-family methodology. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 55–59.Google Scholar
Herlihy, D. (1977). Family and property in Renaissance Florence. In Herlihy, D & Udovitch, A. L, eds., The Medieval City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
Herrera, N. C., Zajonc, R. B., Wieczorkowska, G., & Cichomski, B. (2003). Beliefs about birth rank and their reflection in reality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 142–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hertwig, R., Davis, J. N., & Sulloway, F. J. (2002). Parental investment: How an equity motive can produce inequality. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 728–745.Google Scholar
Hilton, I. (1967). Differences in the behavior of mothers toward first- and later-born children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 282–290.Google Scholar
Horton, S. (1988). Birth order and child nutritional status: evidence from the Philippines. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 36, 341–354.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S., & Judge, D. S. (1993). Darwin and the puzzle of primogeniture. Human Nature, 4, 1–45.Google Scholar
Jang, K. L., Livesley, W. J., Angeleitner, A., Riemann, R., & Vernon, P. A. (2002). Genetic and environmental influences on the covariance of facets defining the domains of the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, T., Herbst, J. H., & McCrae, R. R. (1998). Associations between birth order and personality traits: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 498–509.Google Scholar
Kidwell, J. S. (1982). The neglected birth order: Middleborns. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 225–235.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T., Hasegawa, T., Hiraiwa-Hasegawa, M., & Kurashima, O. (2001). The effect of birth order on personality and familial sentiment in Japan. Poster presented at the 13th conference of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, University College of London, London.Google Scholar
Koch, H. (1955). Some personality correlates of sex, sibling position, and sex of sibling among five- and six-year-old children. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 52, 3–50.Google Scholar
Koch, H. (1956). Attitudes of young children toward their peers as related to certain characteristics of their siblings. Psychological Monographs, 70, 1–41.Google Scholar
Krishnamurthy, K. S., Shaanker, R. U., & Ganeshaiah, K. N. (1997). Seed abortion in an animal dispersed species, Syzgium cuminii (L.). Skeels (Myrtaceae): The chemical basis. Current Science, 73, 869–873.Google Scholar
Kristensen, P., & Bjerkedal, T. (2007). Explaining the relation between birth order and intelligence. Science, 316, 1717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kulik, L. (2004). The impact of birth order on intergenerational transmission of attitudes from parents to adolescent sons: The Israeli case. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 149–157.Google Scholar
Lehmann, J.-Y. K., Nuevo-Chiquero, A., & Vidal-Fernandez, M. (2018). The early origins of birth order differences in children’s outcomes and parental behavior. Journal of Human Resources, 53, 123–156.Google Scholar
Lindert, P. H. (1977). Sibling position and achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 12, 198–219.Google Scholar
Loehlin, J. C. (1992). Genes and Environment in Personality Development. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
MacAndrew, F. T., King, J. C., & Honoroff, L. R. (2002). A sociological analysis of namesaking patterns in 322 American families. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 851–864.Google Scholar
Manaster, G. J., Rhodes, C., Marcus, M. B., & Chan, J. C. (1998). The role of birth order in the acculturation of Japanese Americans. Psychologia, 41, 155–170.Google Scholar
Marini, V. A., & Kurtz, J. E. (2011). Birth order differences in normal personality traits: Perspectives from within and outside the family. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 910–914.Google Scholar
Michalski, R. L., & Shackelford, T. K. (2002). An attempted replication of the relationship between birth order and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 182–186.Google Scholar
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive–affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–268.Google Scholar
Mock, D. W., Drummond, H., & Stinson, C. H. (1990). Avian siblicide. American Scientist, 78, 438–449.Google Scholar
Modin, B. (2002). Birth order and mortality: A life-long follow-up of 14,200 boys and girls born in early 20th century Sweden. Social Science & Medicine, 54, 1051–1064.Google Scholar
Musun-Miller, L. (1993). Sibling status effects: Parents’ perceptions of their own children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 154, 189–198.Google Scholar
Numbers, R. L. (1998). Darwinism Comes to America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nyman, L. (1995). The identification of birth order personality attributes. Journal of Psychology, 129, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulhus, D. L., Chen, D., & Trapnell, P. D. (1999). Birth order and personality within families. Psychological Science, 10, 482–488.Google Scholar
Price, J. (2008). Parent–child quality time: Does birth order matter? Journal of Human Resources, 43, 240–265.Google Scholar
Rodgers, J. L., Cleveland, H. H., van den Oord, E., & Rowe, D. C. (2000). Resolving the debate over birth order, family size, and intelligence. American Psychologist, 55, 599–612.Google Scholar
Rohde, P. A., Atzwanger, K., Butovskaya, M., et al. (2003). Perceived parental favoritism, closeness to kin, and the rebel of the family: The effects of birth order and sex. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 261–276.Google Scholar
Rohrer, J. M., Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. (2015). Examining the effects of birth order on personality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 14224–14229.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, P. C., & Skoogberg, E. L. (1974). Birth order in cross-cultural perspective. Developmental Psychology, 10, 48–54.Google Scholar
Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The Person and the Situation: Perspectives on Social Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Saad, G., Gill, T., & Nataraajan, R. (2005). Are laterborns more nonconforming and open to innovation than firstborns? A Darwinian perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58, 902–909.Google Scholar
Salmon, C. A. (1998). The evocative nature of kin terminology in political rhetoric. Politics and the Life Sciences, 17, 51–57.Google Scholar
Salmon, C. A. (1999). On the impact of sex and birth order on contact with kin. Human Nature, 10, 183–197.Google Scholar
Salmon, C. A. (2003). Birth order and relationships. Human Nature, 14, 73–88.Google Scholar
Salmon, C. A., & Daly, M. (1998). Birth order and familial sentiment: Middleborns are different. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 299–312.Google Scholar
Salmon, C. A., Shackelford, T. K., & Michalski, R. L. (2012). Birth order, sex of child, and perceptions of parental favoritism. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 357–362.Google Scholar
Saroglou, V., & Fiasse, L. (2003). Birth order, personality, and religion: A study among young adults from a three-sibling family. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 19–29.Google Scholar
Schachter, F. F. (1982). Sibling deidentification and split-parent identifications: A family tetrad. In Lamb, M. E. & Sutton-Smith, B., eds., Sibling Relationships: Their Nature and Significance across the Lifespan. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 123–152.Google Scholar
Schachter, F. F., Gilutz, G., Shore, E., & Adler, M. (1978). Sibling deidentification judged by mothers: Cross-validation and developmental studies. Child Development, 49, 543–546.Google Scholar
Schooler, C. (1972). Birth order effects: Not here, not now! Psychological Bulletin, 78, 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, G. W. (1992). Seek a loyal subject in a filial son: Family roots of political orientation in Chinese society. In Institute of Modern History, Academia Sinica, ed., Family Process and Political Process in Modern Chinese History, Vol. 2. Taipei: Chiang Ching-kou Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange, pp. 943–993.Google Scholar
Skinner, N. F., & Fox-Francoeur, C. A. (2010). Personality implications of adaption-innovation: V. Birth order as a determinant of cognitive style. Social Behavior and Personality, 38, 237–240.Google Scholar
Suitor, J. J., & Pillemer, K. (2007). Mother’s favoritism in later life: The role of children’s birth order. Research on Aging, 29, 32–55.Google Scholar
Sulloway, F. J. (1995). Birth order and evolutionary psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 75–80.Google Scholar
Sulloway, F. J. (1996). Born to Rebel: Birth Order, Family Dynamics, and Creative Lives. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Sulloway, F. J. (2001). Birth order, sibling competition, and human behavior. In Holcomb, H. R. III, ed., Conceptual Challenges in Evolutionary Psychology: Innovative Research Strategies. Dordrecht/Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 39–83.Google Scholar
Sulloway, F. J. (2007). Birth order and intelligence. Science, 317, 1711–1712.Google Scholar
Sulloway, F. J. (2009). Sources of scientific innovation: A meta-analytic approach. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 455–459.Google Scholar
Sulloway, F. J. (2010). Why siblings are like Darwin’s Finches: Birth order, sibling competition, and adaptive divergence within the family. In Buss, D. M. & Hawley, P. H., eds., The Evolution of Personality and Individual Differences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 86–119.Google Scholar
Sulloway, F. J. (2014). Openness to scientific innovation. In Simonton, D. K., ed., The Handbook of Genius. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 546–563.Google Scholar
Sulloway, F. J., & Zweigenhaft, R. L. (2010). Birth order and risk taking in athletics: A meta-analysis and study of major league baseball players. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 402–416.Google Scholar
Surbey, M. K. (1998). Parent and offspring strategies in the transition at adolescence. Human Nature, 9, 67–94.Google Scholar
Sutton-Smith, B., & Rosenberg, B. G. (1970). The Sibling. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Theroux, N. L. (1993). Birth order and its relationship to academic achievement and selected personality traits. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B., ed., Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971. Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton, pp. 136–170.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1974). Parent–offspring conflict. American Zoologist, 14, 249–264.Google Scholar
Turner, F. M. (1990). The Victorian crisis of faith and the faith that was lost. In Helmstadter, R. J. & Lightman, B., eds., Victorian Faith in Crisis: Essays on Continuity and Change in Nineteenth-Century Religious Belief. London: Macmillan, pp. 9–38.Google Scholar
Voland, E. (1988). Differential infant and child mortality in evolutionary perspective: Data from the late 17th to 19th century Ostfriesland (Germany). In Betzig, L., Borgerhoff Mulder, M., & Turke, P., eds., Human Reproduction Behaviour: A Darwinian Perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 253–262.Google Scholar
Voland, E. (1990). Differential reproductive success within the Krummhorn population (Germany, 18th and 19th centuries). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 26, 54–72.Google Scholar
Wichman, A. L., Rodgers, J. L., & MacCallum, R. C. (2006). A multilevel approach to the relationship between birth order and intelligence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 117–127.Google Scholar
Zajonc, R. B. (1976). Family configuration and intelligence. Science, 192, 227–236.Google Scholar
Zajonc, R. B., & Mullally, P. R. (1997). Birth order: Reconciling conflicting effects. American Psychologist, 52, 685–699.Google Scholar
Zajonc, R. B., & Sulloway, F. J. (2007). The confluence model: Birth order as a within-family or between-family dynamic? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1187–1194.Google Scholar
Ziv, I., & Hermel, O. (2011). Birth order effects on the separation process in young adults: An evolutionary and dynamic approach. American Journal of Psychology, 124, 261–273.Google Scholar
Zweigenhaft, R. L. (2002). Birth order effects and rebelliousness: Political activism and involvement with marijuana. Political Psychology, 23, 219–233.Google Scholar
Zweigenhaft, R. L., & Von Ammon, J. (2000). Birth order and civil disobedience: A test of Sulloway’s “born to rebel” hypothesis. Journal of Social Psychology, 140, 624–627.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×